Rev. Cecil Williams dies
13
The Stud's return
ARTS
Sacto studies queer history
ARTS
07
06
13
Stephen Mark Lukas
The
www.ebar.com
Serving the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer communities since 1971
Vol. 54 • No. 17 • April 25-May 1, 2024
Courtesy Horizons Foundation
Horizons Foundation President Roger Doughty
Screen capture AP/YouTube
U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona
Foundations lag in giving to LGBTQ causes by Matthew S. Bajko
L
GBTQ issues in recent years have increasingly become a political flashpoint in school districts and statehouses across the country. Marriage equality is even making a return to the California ballot this November, 16 years after Golden State voters banned samesex marriage via a ballot measure later overturned by federal courts but whose language remains embedded in the state constitution. Yet, over the last decade, giving by the country’s philanthropic foundations to LGBTQ causes has remained wanting. Reports have documented a spike in the amount of funds going toward LGBTQ nonprofits since 2015, but the starting point was so low that the figures can paint a misleading picture, contend philanthropic leaders from the LGBTQ community. In 2021, for instance, foundational giving to LGBTQ causes reached $251 million, according to the most recent LGBTQ grantmaking by U.S. foundations tracking report released by Funders for LGBTQ Issues. But it represented just 0.13% of total charitable support doled out that year. “It is an unbelievably small number. It speaks volumes to how relatively underfunded we are,” said Roger Doughty, a gay man who is president of Horizons Foundation, the LGBTQ philanthropic organization that supports Bay Area nonprofits and service providers. The one positive, noted Doughty, is the trajectory in foundational giving to LGBTQ causes has been trending upward. Between 2015 and 2019 it grew by 46%. “At least it is going up, not down,” he told the Bay Area Reporter during a recent interview. Katie Carter, who is queer and CEO of the Pride Foundation (https://pridefoundation. org/) that supports LGBTQ groups throughout the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, agreed with Doughty that the rising trend lines, while heartening to see, can give a false impression about the state of foundational giving. As the tracking report noted, for every $100 awarded by U.S. foundations in 2021, only 28 cents specifically supported LGBTQ communities and issues. See page 2 >>
John Ferrannini
Biden admin finalizes protections for LGBTQ students
Castro Theatre blade gets makeover
by Christopher Kane, Washington Blade
A
N
nother Planet Entertainment has begun renovation of the neon blade and marquee for the Castro Theatre. Workers erected scaffolding outside the historic movie palace in mid-April. Asked how long restoration of the lighted signage will take, gay spokesperson David Perry told the Bay
Area Reporter April 19 that it was “hard to tell at this stage. Once it’s all up and a thorough investigation takes place, we’ll have a better idea.” For now, one of the most iconic sites in San Francisco – and a beacon for the LGBTQ community globally – is going to look a bit different.
ational LGBTQ organizations praised the Biden administration Friday after the U.S. Department of Education issued its final rule that revises Title IX, a federal civil rights law, and addresses trans students. See page 10 >>
CA judge agrees with Bonta that ballot measure attacks rights of transgender youth by John Ferrannini
A
judge has sided with the state of California in the matter of a conservative group that sued over the title and summary Attorney General Rob Bonta assigned to its ballot measure that would strip rights from transgender minors. As the Bay Area Reporter previously reported, Protect Kids California is gathering signatures for a ballot measure that would ban trans minors from receiving gender-affirming care; ban trans girls from female competitive sports, locker rooms and bathrooms; and require public schools to disclose students’ gender identities to parents if they say they are different than their sex at birth. Protect Kids California has until May 28 to collect some 550,000 valid signatures in order to place the measure before state voters on the November 5 ballot. Most LGBTQ leaders doubt they will be successful in reaching that threshold. In preparing a ballot title and summary for the measure, Bonta titled it “Restricts Rights of Transgender Youth.” It prompted the Liberty Justice Center to file a lawsuit February 13 in Sacramento County Superior Court on behalf of Protect Kids California that alleged Bonta’s personal beliefs led to a biased title and summary. Therefore, the center contended the ballot measure proponents should be given 180 additional days for signature gathering without discounting signatures already collected.
Courtesy AG’s office
California Attorney General Rob Bonta
“Respondent [Bonta] has demonstrated that he personally, and in his official capacity, is opposed to any kind of notification by a public school to a parent or guardian that his or her child is exhibiting signs of gender dysphoria when the child asks the school to publicly treat him or her as the opposite sex with a new name or pronouns, and to allow the child to use the sex-segregated facilities of the opposite sex,” claimed the groups in their lawsuit.
But a Sacramento Superior Court judge sided with Bonta in a ruling that was first issued tentatively April 19 and was made final April 22. Judge Stephen Acquisto ruled that Bonta’s title and summary are accurate. “Under current law, minor students have express statutory rights with respect to their gender identity,” Acquisto stated. “A substantial portion of the proposed measure is dedicated to eliminating or restricting these statutory rights. … The proposed measure would eliminate express statutory rights and place a condition of parental consent on accommodations that are currently available without such condition. “The proposed measure objectively ‘restricts rights’ of transgender youth by preventing the exercise of their existing rights. ‘Restricts rights of transgender youth’ is an accurate and impartial description of the proposed measure,” Acquisto added. The attorney general’s office has some leeway when it comes to determining ballot titles, the judge noted. Bonta is “afforded ‘considerable latitude’ in preparing a title and summary,” Acquisto ruled. He found, “The court’s task is not to decide what language best captures the essence of the proposed measure, but to decide whether the language chosen by the Attorney General is ‘untrue, misleading, or argumentative.’ The Court finds that the Attorney See page 10 >>