VISION2030
© The American School in Japan, 2024
© The American School in Japan, 2024
Chapter One
What is ASIJ’s purpose, and who do we serve?
Chapter Two
How are the needs of modern learners evolving, and how are our perceptions of success changing?
Chapter Three
How is ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework built to navigate the changing landscape of education?
Chapter Four
How does ASIJ’s future vision for its Chofu campus inspire and deepen opportunities to advance the Strategic Design Framework?
Chapter Five
How does ASIJ benchmark against global and local standards to ensure we are meeting the evolving needs of our students and community?
Chapter Six
How have we advanced ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework, and what initiatives are we planning for the next few years?
Chapter Seven
What literature or research informs our Strategic Design Framework?
The American School in Japan (ASIJ) was founded in 1902, which speaks not only to the school’s stability and continuity but also to our capacity to evolve over time. ASIJ’s ability to promote itself as a premiere international school in Tokyo and one of the leading international schools in the world, has been grounded in our willingness to negotiate the turmoil, challenges, and opportunities of each generation for over 120 years.
After nearly three decades of incremental reform in schools, the landscape of education is now evolving at an accelerating pace. A confluence of powerful social, economic, scientific, and technological drivers is compelling schools to interrogate not only what they teach, but also how and why. Schools must either choose to engage these disruptive challenges or remain instead anchored to familiar systems, practices, and pedagogies that are comfortable, yet poorly equipped to meet the challenges of our time. If schools like ASIJ share a common imperative in today’s changing landscape, it is that we must lean in, urgently, otherwise we risk failing a generation of students destined to enter adulthood in an increasingly complex, diverse, and rapidly changing world.
This ebook frames a coherent vision of where ASIJ is going, why, and how we plan to get there, while ensuring we have the perspective and agility to adapt. It envisions the strategic commitments ASIJ’s faculty, school leaders, Board of Directors, and community must embrace to advance and operationalize our shared vision, which we call our Strategic Design Framework (SDF). Seven questions frame the chapters of this ebook:
1. What is ASIJ’s purpose, and who do we serve?
2. How are the needs of modern learners evolving, and how are our perceptions of success changing?
3. How is ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework built to navigate the changing landscape in education?
4. How does ASIJ’s future vision for its Chofu campus inspire and deepen opportunities to advance our Strategic Design Framework?
5. How does ASIJ benchmark against global and local standards to ensure we are meeting the evolving needs of our students and community?
6. How have we advanced ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework, and what initiatives are we planning for the next few years?
7. What literature and research informs our Strategic Design Framework?
ASIJ has refined these questions and our SDF through numerous iterations of a confidential white paper over the last few years. This ebook marks a departure from that practice. By sharing our journey openly in this ebook, we intend to explore the purpose, goals, and strategy behind our work. ASIJ recognizes that as a wellresourced, independent, international school, we have an onus of responsibility to share our efforts and strategies with any school that is similarly holding themselves accountable to their students. In this spirit of collaboration and mutual growth, we hope to learn from other like-minded schools that are also striving to think differently about how they can better serve the needs of the students we are privileged to serve, now and in the future.
Dr Jim Hardin Head of School
What is ASIJ’s purpose, and who do we serve?
During the 2017-18 school year, ASIJ embarked on a comprehensive strategic design process to refresh our mission and craft a forwardlooking strategic vision. This initiative, enriched by insights from hundreds of stakeholders—including trustees, students, alumni, parents, and faculty—demonstrated our commitment to inclusivity and collaborative decision-making. In partnership with Greenwich Leadership Partners, known for their expertise in board governance and strategic planning, we renewed our mission, vision, and core values. This collaboration led our Board of Directors to articulate our purpose through the development of Policy #20001, establishing the ASIJ School Profile, among other key policies. These actions codify our dedication to serving ASIJ’s diverse, equitable, and inclusive community, as well as to ensuring we are actively working to meet the evolving needs of our students, both now and in the future.
Originally established as the Tokyo School for Foreign Children in 1902, ASIJ proudly stands as one of the oldest international schools in the world. ASIJ first operated in rented facilities at the Kanda YMCA and primarily catered to children associated with the Episcopal Mission. Possessing a rich history that now stretches over 120 years, we believe our ability to remain relevant has been grounded in our willingness to negotiate the turmoil, challenges, and opportunities of each generation. ASIJ’s enduring legacy of excellence, recognized in Japan, within the global international school community, and by colleges and universities around the world, stem from our commitment to remain forward-facing and willing to adapt to the evolving needs of our students.
1. Policy #2000 – School Profile, approved by ASIJ Board of Directors in November 2017.
ASIJ holds accreditation from the Western Association of Schools & Colleges (WASC)2, the premier authority for English-medium schools in Asia, and maintains affiliation with the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS)3, a leader in defining governance principles for independent, not-for-profit schools. These affiliations underscore our commitment to being ‘Mission-driven, Vision-led,’ aligning with the highest standards of good governance as outlined in The International Trustee Handbook (2019)4. This alignment ensures ASIJ adheres to best practices in understanding our purpose, serving our community, and developing strategies to realize our vision.
2. Western Association of Schools and Colleges, or WASC, is the most reputable accreditation commission for schools in western North America and Asia. ASIJ’s accreditation through WASC allows our diploma or transcript to be recognized by schools, colleges, universities, or other authorities around the world.
3. National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) provides ASIJ with insights into trends and strategies specifically among US independent schools, enhancing our perspective on trends in US-based schools.
4. Chojnacki, D. and R.M. Detwiler (2019). International Trustee Handbook – A guide to effective governance for international independent school boards (Second Edition). National Association of Independent Schools.
“Learning is a personal, lifelong process that leads to change, including the ability and willingness to adapt. It is driven by curiosity and motivation, occurring in supportive environments rich in engagement, social interaction and feedback. Learning is constructed in authentic contexts and results in the development of new understandings and skills for all learners.”
-Definition of learning, approved in Policy #2100
ASIJ’s purpose is to help all students thrive and become accountable leaders and positive difference-makers in an increasingly complex, diverse, and rapidly changing world.
We do this by knowing each learner and developing their capacities to learn through six transdisciplinary competencies that they apply in responding to authentic, real-world problems.
with others, thereby transforming themselves and the world in the process.
Professional Standards for Growth & Excellence
Learning that engages and applies six global competencies— Mindset, Global Citizenship, Communication, Collaboration, Creativity, and Critical Thinking—often through addressing authentic, real-world challenges, both individually and as members of a team.
This approach emphasizes the development of students' metacognitive skills, empowering them to assume agency in monitoring, assessing, and adapting their learning strategies.
By fostering these competencies, students achieve deeper, more durable learning, preparing them to navigate a complex, ever-changing world and contribute meaningfully to society.
Approach is as dynamic and diverse as our students
Guided by our Board of Directors, ASIJ has implemented important policies to articulate our purpose and direction. Policy #21005 renews our Mission, Vision, and Core Values, introducing our Definition of Learning, while Policy #22006 presents our N-12 Portrait of a Learner. These policies, integral to our Strategic Design Framework (SDF), lay the groundwork for a strategic plan inspired by the work of the leading authority on school change, Michael Fullan7, whose work is explored further in Chapter 3. Our SDF confirms ASIJ’s commitment to maintaining a focused, coherent, and adaptable strategic plan that is sensitive to the evolving needs of our students and their families.
Recent board policies further clarify ASIJ’s purpose and values. Policy #22108 focuses on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, cementing our dedication to recognizing the inherent value of every individual and fostering a culture of belonging. Policy #22159 provides ASIJ’s definition of sustainability and expresses ASIJ’s commitment to teaching students to deeply appreciate and understand their obligations to others, including future generations. These policies reflect ASIJ’s deep commitment to creating an inclusive, sustainable community that aligns with our strategic vision and educational mission.
5. Policy #2100 – Mission, Vision, Definition of Learning, approved by ASIJ Board of Directors in February 2020.
6. Policy #2200 – Portrait of a Learner, approved by ASIJ Board of Directors in May 2020.
7. Fullan, M. & Quinn, J. (2015). Coherence. A joint publication of The Ontario Principals’ Council and Corwin: SAGE Company. Fullan presents research to support a comprehensive model with four interdependent drivers to lead school reform. Fullan’s Coherence Framework is the inspiration for ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework.
8. Policy #2210 – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, approved by ASIJ Board of Directors in April 2021.
9. Policy #2215 – Sustainability, approved by ASIJ Board of Directors in April 2022. Policy #2215 borrows from the Brundtland Commission’s 1987 definition of sustainable development, which frames sustainability as “[meeting] the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” and proposes the twin concepts of intergenerational justice and intergenerational sustainability.
Policy #2000 underlines ASIJ’s dedication to delivering rigorous academic and intellectual experiences not just in our High School, but across all divisions, ensuring a strong academic foundation from the earliest grades. In our High School, this commitment manifests through the selection of Advanced Placement (AP) courses and other advanced courses, offering the ability to critically assess and evolve our programming to meet the changing needs of modern learners. By allowing students to choose AP courses à la carte, we provide them with the flexibility to tailor their learning journeys, explore their interests, and engage in deep, meaningful studies. This approach not only facilitates self-directed learning and the pursuit of passions but also distinguishes ASIJ in a market largely dominated by schools offering the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. It supports the development of signature experiences that extend beyond traditional academics, including advanced research, real-world internships, high-quality advisory experiences, learning partnerships, and service learning opportunities. This holistic and flexible educational strategy across all school divisions reaffirms our commitment to preparing students to succeed and thrive in a rapidly evolving global landscape, marking ASIJ as a forward-thinking, adaptable educational institution committed to fostering intellectual growth from the youngest learners to those on the cusp of graduation.
Policy #2000 commits ASIJ to offering an American-style college preparatory education, underpinned by a liberal arts curriculum that aligns with the expectations of colleges and universities our students aspire to attend. This commitment includes providing AP and concurrent enrollment courses recognized by higher education institutions worldwide. Notably, while 75% of our students continue their education in North American universities, 25% choose prestigious universities in Europe, Japan, and other regions, showcasing ASIJ’s exceptional support for students applying to top universities globally. In response to the evolving college admissions landscape, ASIJ is proactive in adapting our strategies to support our students effectively. In addition to the outstanding counselors who support our students, we recognize signature experiences, well-integrated into our curriculum, play a crucial role in distinguishing our students, highlighting their unique potentials and capabilities to admissions committees.
In a world increasingly defined by Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA), as described by Dr Ulcca Joshi Hansen10, ASIJ recognizes the imperative to prepare students for the challenges and changes they are facing and will face in the future. Policy #2000 commits ASIJ to a holistic education that meets the needs of the whole child, integrating physical, social, and emotional well-being into our programming. This approach, rooted in the tradition of American-style education, advocates for a broad spectrum of co-curricular experiences—from fine arts and athletics to service-related clubs—ensuring students not only achieve academic excellence but also develop character, leadership skills, and integrity. The ASIJ Board of Directors mandates a balanced educational experience that encourages students to explore their passions, engage in their communities, and compete with honor. Reflecting this commitment, ASIJ has significantly invested in support services including counseling, safeguarding, advisory, and co-curricular activities, underlining our dedication to student well-being and the development of wellrounded individuals poised to navigate and contribute to a rapidly evolving world.
Many students and alumni report that their most indelible memories of ASIJ concerned a patient, caring teacher who took time to know them as individuals, value what was unique or different about them, and care about their wellbeing and success.
ASIJ students learn to respect and appreciate Japan by engaging with our host country’s language and rich cultural heritage.
Japan provides ASIJ with a remarkably rich tapestry of culture and history. Reflecting on their time at ASIJ, many alumni credit their deep respect and appreciation for Japanese culture, alongside invaluable cross-cultural competencies, as key outcomes of their ASIJ education—skills that have proven invaluable throughout their lives and professional careers. Policy #2000 underscores this by committing ASIJ to draw upon our distinctive presence in Japan, weaving the language and cultural studies of our host country into the fabric of an ASIJ education. We actively invest in resources and initiatives to honor this commitment, ensuring that the culture and language of Japan are celebrated through our students’ learning experiences. This includes fostering partnerships that provide our students with meaningful interactions through service learning, and engagements with visiting artists, writers, politicians, and cultural experts. Our Japan-based learning partnerships and comprehensive language program, catering to both native and non-native Japanese speakers, are pivotal in bringing Japan’s culture and language to our learners. The priority to immerse students in their host country’s environment, a cornerstone of ASIJ’s mission, enriches their education and underscores a continuous commitment that has been a hallmark of the school’s legacy.
ASIJ is ultimately committed to serving families attracted to our mission, values, and the sense of purpose articulated in this chapter. We do not believe that the experiences and programming ASIJ provides will be the right fit for every family. Fortunately, there are other fine international schools in the Tokyo market, and families should choose the school that offers the values and priorities that resonate most powerfully with them.
Per Policy #2000, ASIJ is defined as ‘an independent, co-educational day school’ catering to ‘children of international families,’ including both those on temporary assignments and those who call Tokyo their permanent home. Our community is enriched by students who join us for varying lengths of time—some for their entire N-12 education and others for shorter periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of our international community. Particularly in our ELC, ES, and MS programs, we strive to serve these families effectively, ensuring a smooth transition for expatriate families through a curriculum designed to foster the skills and competencies essential for success in future academic pursuits, whether in the US or elsewhere.
The 2019 review of Policy #240011, which revises our Admissions Policy, marked an important shift in our approach to inclusivity. Historically, ASIJ’s admissions were heavily influenced by academic performance or potential, often limiting access for applicants with learning or language differences. The revision aims to broaden our admissions criteria to include ‘mission-aligned’ families, reflecting a deeper commitment to diversity and equal opportunity. Policy #2400 now articulates our dedication to non-discrimination and our pursuit of a diverse school community, embracing cultural, linguistic, experiential, and intellectual diversity as core to our identity.
This policy revision underscores ASIJ’s commitment to the principles of diversity and equal opportunity, as outlined in Policy #2210, signaling our readiness to allocate resources and adapt our student support programs to better align with our mission and strategic goals. Through these changes, ASIJ affirms its dedication to shaping an inclusive, engaged community that reflects the broad spectrum of human experience and thought.
11. Policy #2400 – Admissions Policy, approved by ASIJ Board of Directors in March 2020.
Through our exploration of ASIJ’s purpose, alongside our mission, vision and understanding of whom we serve, this chapter aims to reaffirm our steadfast commitment to delivering a holistic, rigorous, and inclusive education, finely attuned to the evolving needs of our students and the complex global landscape they will inhabit. Anchored in a rich historical legacy and driven by a mission-focused and vision-led philosophy, ASIJ wholeheartedly embraces diversity, equity, and innovation within every facet of our educational programs. By capitalizing on our unique position in Japan, we aim to deepen our community’s cultural and linguistic connections, while our revised admissions policy reflects our intent to embrace a wider array of learners, showcasing our commitment to being a forward-thinking and adaptable institution. As we forge ahead, our unwavering dedication to cultivating well-rounded, intellectually engaged, and globally aware learners stands at the forefront of our mission, ensuring ASIJ not only readies students for today’s challenges but also empowers them to seize tomorrow’s opportunities.
Our students learn in a community that’s diverse in many different ways. They learn to recognize the value of learning with and from peers who have different life experiences and backgrounds.
Chapter Two
How are the needs of modern learners evolving, and how are our perceptions of success changing?
Aconfluence of factors is catalyzing a paradigm shift in education. Thought leaders like Ken Robinson, Michael Fullan, and Tony Wagner have long advocated for school reform. And yet, most schools have approached deep change with caution if not timidity. In recent years, however, a consensus has grown that the needs of modern learners are evolving more rapidly, which has necessitated a bolder rethinking of how schools can best serve their students. This chapter focuses on the challenges modern learners face, how their needs are evolving, and how schools like ASIJ need to reenvision how we think about success.
Part 1 examines the evolving needs of modern learners by presenting a list of ten challenges our students face. Powerful social, economic, scientific, and technological challenges are changing the ways human beings find meaning and purpose, how we organize our societies, what we believe, and how we connect and communicate with one another. Recent developments in Artificial Intelligence and the integration of new digital technologies in our personal and professional lives demand that schools actively interrogate not only what they teach, but also how and why. By highlighting these ten challenges, we aim to hold ourselves accountable to our current generation of ASIJ students by understanding the context in which they are coming of age.
Part 2 scrutinizes changing perceptions of success, examining how attitudes and beliefs have shifted since the early 2000s and how the challenges outlined in Part 1 demand a continued rethinking of what is needed to be successful. Reflecting the unique needs of learners at different developmental ages, this section includes division-specific assessments of how attributes, mindsets, and priorities have shifted over time and how views on success might further evolve moving forward. Rather than providing an answer, each division is sharing their thinking as a provocation to stimulate discussion about the shifting needs of their students. Similarly, our cross-divisional student support team has explored evolving values, attitudes, and mindsets about what it means to be “smart” and the unique talents each child brings into the world.
As we navigate a world distinct from what previous generations experienced, understanding the unique challenges faced by Generation Z (1996-2009) and Generation Alpha (2010-2024) is critical. At ASIJ, we have identified ten challenges through insights from a diverse group of stakeholders, including educational thought leaders, our faculty, students, parents, and the Board of Directors. This list aims to illuminate the specific hurdles our students will encounter and to initiate discussions on how ASIJ can evolve its curriculum, programs, and teaching methods to best serve this generation and future generations. While this list is presented in a sequential order, we discourage readers from placing too much importance on our ranking. Our list is fluid, with the challenges we have identified rising and falling.
While ASIJ teachers frame learning experiences, students often collaborate and direct their own learning through student-led projects.
Stress, pressure, and evolving social norms are contributing to what many experts see as an emerging mental health crisis. Exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, schools like ASIJ must assume increased responsibility for helping students find purpose, meaning, and belonging in a rapidly changing world. In order to adapt and find their place in the world, modern learners need to deeply understand their own identities, cultures, and values, while learning in contexts where they are permitted to assume greater agency over their learning.
The acronym VUCA emerged in the mid-1980s to describe a world that was increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous. Thought leaders in education have recently borrowed the acronym to describe the context in which modern learners are coming of age. In order to allay the challenges associated with VUCA, Dr Hansen contends schools must deliberately construct human-centered environments that prioritize three elements: Relationships (recognizing our interdependence and mutuality); Relevance (how individual learners discover meaning); and Reintegration (choosing to deliberately engage in community, resist fragmentation, and embrace connections between all things).
After decades with only incremental shifts to our understanding of human cognition, research is beginning to reveal new perspectives about how human beings learn during different developmental periods of their lives. Given how much our knowledge of human cognition is changing12, schools must recognize that their pedagogies and programs must adapt to the evolving needs of modern learners. During her January 2024 visit with ASIJ third graders, Dr Hansen encouraged children to avoid the question “Are you smart?” and to instead ask others, “How are you smart, and how will you bring that into the world?”
According to a variety of reputable sources (World Bank, IDC, Pew Research Center, Statista, Wired magazine), new knowledge is proliferating at an exponential rate. Modern learners are coming of age in a world where developments in digital technologies and social media are altering the ways and pace at which content is created, disseminated, and consumed. The overwhelming volume of information, increase in misinformation, and common use of algorithms that reinforce biases and sow conflict make it more important than ever for schools to develop students’ capacities to think critically and discern what is reliable, evidence-based, and true. We believe our students’ capacities for better discernment make them more informed decision-makers and problem-solvers who will engage with the world and act upon it with integrity.
12. Dr Hansen, presentation on the evolution of human cognition and learning in the past decade, Professional Development Exercise for ASIJ Teachers and Faculty, The American School in Japan, Tokyo, Japan, January 15-17, 2024. Hansen discussed how advances in neuroscience have led to a more sophisticated understanding of memory formation, storage, and retrieval, and how the hemispheres of the brain work interdependently. She shared research into embodied cognition, situated cognition, and distributed cognition have demonstrated the variety of ways human beings make sense of the world and learn. Hansen reviewed the extensive body of research that has elevated the impact of empathy and other social-emotional competencies on learning. She discussed the groundbreaking research that asserts that learning is seldom linear and almost always jagged, a finding that raises hard questions about how schools are organized. Finally, Hansen discussed how research is mounting about the power of metacognition and the importance of students learning to direct, manage, and adjust their own cognitive processes.
Technological change is accelerating with shifts that previously occurred over years now happening in months. These changes in technology impact most of the challenges presented in this list and create a new sense of urgency for schools that are trying to help modern learners prepare for this rapidly changing world. The quickening pace of change underscores the priority schools must give to cultivating the adaptability and flexibility of our students, ensuring they are equipped to navigate and thrive in a perpetually evolving landscape.
Advancements in A.I. have accelerated since late 2022, with ChatGPT and other A.I. developments signaling how dramatically different the world will be in the near future. These rapid advancements necessitate a fundamental rethinking of school curricula and pedagogy. Historically, what is taught has been far more influential than why or how. Schools that stubbornly refuse to reconsider their priorities, systems, and programs or that focus narrowly on how to prevent cheating will underserve their students in the very near future. Schools must guide students in ethically, responsibly, and purposefully using generative A.I. tools, while also teaching them to critically evaluate the information provided by these tools. It’s essential for students to be aware of each A.I. tool’s limitations and implications, ensuring these technologies enhance learning rather than circumvent it.
Modern learners are coming of age in an era of considerable instability and strife. International schools like ASIJ need to redouble their efforts to develop globallyminded students who are willing to be accountable leaders and problem-solvers committed to human equity, peace, and sustainable political systems that meet the needs of both this and future generations. We live in a time of increased political polarization, where democratic institutions and the rule of law have been threatened in many regions of the world. The influence of international institutions has weakened, and several dangerous conflicts now rage in different parts of the world. Despite global strides in reducing extreme poverty, improving life expectancy in less affluent countries, and lowering global child mortality rates, disparities between the world’s wealthiest and poorest continue to widen, with the middle class diminishing. This increasing economic inequality underscores the challenges modern learners face in an interconnected world.
Climate change is leading to rising temperatures, shifting and more extreme weather patterns, rising sea levels, and the loss of biodiversity, profoundly affecting governments, economies, and human societies worldwide. These environmental changes, coupled with their significant human impact, are shaping the worldviews of the generation of students we now serve. The adverse effects of climate change are disproportionately burdening poorer regions, exacerbating existing vulnerabilities and inequalities. This reality underscores the urgency for modern learners to comprehend not only the science behind climate change but also its uneven human consequences. Consequently, schools like ASIJ must actively embrace sustainability, recognizing our responsibility to understand these disparities. It is imperative to embed principles of intergenerational sustainability and intergenerational justice within our educational practices, preparing students to confront and mitigate the inequities amplified by climate change, and fostering a commitment to a just and sustainable future for all.
Western educational traditions employ a liberal arts framework where learning is siloed in different subject areas, thereby creating conditions where learning is fragmented into discrete and predetermined sets of content knowledge and skills. If they are inclined to rethink disciplinarity at all, Dr Hansen observes that most schools employ one of three models, either Additive (multidisciplinary learning–observing a problem from different perspectives), Interactive (interdisciplinary learning–solving a problem following some interaction between two or three disciplines), or Holistic (transdisciplinary learning–residing inside individuals and groups and bringing people together across disciplines to solve complex problems). Modern learners are entering a world where it is more important to explore and understand complex relationships and connections between ideas or phenomena.
Little is certain about the future of work except for the recognition that modern learners will need different skills than those required by previous generations. Organizations such as the WEF, OECD, McKinsey, Deloitte, PwC, and the Rand Corporation are forecasting that the future of work will look very different from what it looks like today. The recent global pandemic led to significant changes in when, where, and how people work. The pandemic accelerated trends toward globalization, asynchronous work, and preferencing digital to in-person work. A.I. is beginning to impact how and by whom work is done in many fields, leading to further uncertainty about what humans will be doing and the nature of work in the future. The skills and competencies modern learners need to thrive in the future, simply put, will be different from those that have benefitted previous generations.
As we reflect on the myriad challenges our current generation of students faces, it becomes increasingly evident that the traditional paradigms of education no longer suffice. The ten challenges outlined in this section paint a picture of the complex landscape our students at ASIJ navigate daily and will increasingly experience in the very near future. These challenges are not isolated issues; they are interconnected facets of a rapidly evolving global society.
In response, it becomes our imperative as educators, leaders, and community members to not just acknowledge these challenges, but to actively and innovatively address them. Our curriculum, pedagogies, and institutional philosophies must be dynamically re-evaluated and adapted to prepare our students not just to survive, but to thrive in this new world. The task ahead is not trivial – it requires a fundamental shift in how we view education and success.
At the heart of ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework is the recognition that we must foster curiosity and a leaner’s mindset in our students in order to empower them to explore and question the world around them.
Children in our ELC experience the joy and independence of a play-based philosophy. As students grow and mature we aim to continue nurturing their curiosity through inquiry and self-directed learning experiences.
Since its founding in 1902, ASIJ has witnessed each generation infusing their unique experiences, values, and perspectives into perceptions of what it means to be successful, both in academics and life. This section explores our evolving ideas about student success, examining the shifts over time, the constants, and the changes we anticipate over the coming decade.
As highlighted in Chapter 1, preparing students for college remains a core aspect of ASIJ’s mission. Our Policy #2000 affirms our dedication to offering an ‘American-style college preparatory education,’ culminating in a high school diploma, and ensuring the intellectual and academic rigor necessary to support students’ higher education aspirations.
For generations, including Baby Boomers (1945-1965) and Generation X (1966-1980), the value of a college degree was clear-cut, often representing a gateway to a promising career in a professional field. Millennials (19811996) entered adulthood with similar expectations, though they often faced increasing pressure to secure admission to selective institutions. This landscape was further complicated by the emergence of influential rankings by entities like U.S. News & World Report along with two separate factors that led to increased applications at selective colleges: (1) the common application and (2) efforts by selective universities to increase the volume of applications from around the world, which lead to a more competitive college admissions environment in the 1990s and early 2000s. This competition has intensified, particularly for Generations Z (1996-2009) and Alpha (2010-2024), creating new levels of pressure on students and families who define success as acceptance into a highly selective university. Such an environment has spurred ASIJ to reflect on what it means to be successful in each of our divisions and how that has changed over time.
Links to five original provocations appear on the next page. Each ASIJ division has developed a one-page provocation that explores the qualities and skills a student has needed in the past, needs in our contemporary context, and will need in the future to be successful in that particular developmental period of their life. Additionally, our cross-divisional student support team offers its own unique provocation that explores how our attitudes and beliefs about intelligence, learning, inclusion, and equity are evolving. The five provocations critically examine the attributes, values, and dispositions prevalent in the early 2000s, how they have transformed or endured, and how we anticipate our perceptions of success evolving over the next 5-10 years.
Success Provocations — Each division and our student support team created visualizations that invite us to question our assumptions, values, and beliefs about
Our success provocations offer essential perspectives on the rapidly evolving landscape of education and how we perceive success. These provocations, rich in diversity and deputy, are designed to stimulate discussion, challenge, and expand our understanding of our obligations to our students. They highlight the pressing need to reimagine our priorities and systems, emphasizing that updating our beliefs and practices is an urgent necessity, not just a choice. These provocations make us question our assumptions, values, and beliefs about success. As we redefine what it means for students to succeed, we must reimagine how to meet these evolving needs. The journey of transforming ASIJ requires that we navigate these shifting paradigms. The next chapter will introduce three transformative frameworks that inform how we navigate this complex educational terrain.
The ten challenges identified in this chapter, along with the success provocations we have shared, underscore the rapidly evolving needs of modern learners and highlight the critical need for a deeper reevaluation of our current systems, practices, and priorities. By highlighting these challenges and inviting discussion on our evolving perceptions of success, we recognize the complex, interconnected world our students will soon navigate. It is imperative for ASIJ to evolve, ensuring our educational practices foster resilience, purpose, and a deep sense of belonging in a rapidly changing global society. Meeting these challenges will necessitate the collective efforts of our divisional faculties, acknowledging that our existing systems, curriculum, and practices may no longer be adequate. Indeed, our entire community must come together, embracing change with a willingness to reimagine how we can better serve this generation of students and those to come. This commitment sets the stage for Chapter 6, where divisions and teams will outline their key initiatives, goals, and changes for the upcoming years, demonstrating our dedication to adapt, innovate, and thrive in response to the future needs of our learners.
Our students join a vibrant community where they engage, form meaningful friendships, and grow into passionate, purposeful individuals.
At ASIJ, we believe cross-divisional mentorships often lead to transformative learning opportunities, where older students guide younger ones, enriching their journeys and fostering a community of engaged, empathetic learners.
This chapter explores the origins and priorities of our Strategic Design Framework (SDF) and elaborates on why we are confident that this framework equips ASIJ with the direction and adaptability required to navigate the evolving landscape of education described in Chapter 2.
In partnership with Stephanie Rogen of Greenwich Leadership Partners, the ASIJ Board of Directors initiated a strategic planning process during the 2017-18 school year that crafted our SDF. Board members recognized that our creation of a compelling, future-focused vision of learning needed to precede the development of a new master plan that renovated or replaced existing facilities on our Chofu campus. The result was the SDF, which has since evolved into a dynamic and responsive blueprint for ASIJ’s future.
The SDF’s development was significantly influenced by the work of distinguished educational figures such as Ken Robinson, Carol Dweck, and John Hattie, among many others. These contributions are detailed in Chapter 7 through a comprehensive annotated bibliography that details the extensive research informing our strategic choices.
In this chapter, we focus on three of the greatest influences on our SDF:
Michael Fullan’s pioneering work on school change and pedagogy
Fullan, a leading voice in school reform for over four decades, alongside Joanne Quinn, has profoundly influenced our SDF through their books Coherence (2016) and Deep Learning (2018). Their Coherence Framework, with its four interdependent dimensions, and their competency-based Deep Learning model, are cornerstones of ASIJ’s SDF.
Heifetz, Grashow, and Linsky’s Adaptive Leadership model
The Practice of Adaptive Leadership (2009) identifies a common pitfall in organizational change: the reliance on technical solutions for complex, adaptive challenges. In line with the challenges outlined in Chapter 2, our SDF adopts an agile, responsive, and opportunity-based approach, embodying the principles of adaptive leadership as described by Heifetz, Grashow, and Linsky.
Dr Hansen’s vision for a human-centered education
In The Future of Smart (2021), Dr Hansen critiques the prevailing western educational paradigm for its inadequacy in addressing the rapidly evolving needs of modern learners. Her human-centered model offers a critical lens through which ASIJ is re-thinking how we can best prepare our students for the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) that characterizes the rapidly changing world around us.
The impact of these authors’ work on the SDF is explored in greater detail in this chapter and our extensive annotated bibliography in Chapter 7 provides additional information.
Fullan and Quinn’s Coherence Framework is based on their extensive research on school reform spanning four decades. The authors contend that many schools mistakenly depend on the wrong drivers for school improvement. Examples of wrong drivers include pursuing technology as a panacea, chasing ‘best practice’ in outdated pedagogical models, and following assessment-driven models that are inflexible and insensitive to the evolving needs of modern learners.
In Coherence (2016), Fullan and Quinn share the research behind the four drivers that most powerfully leverage systemic change in schools. The authors emphasize these drivers are interdependent and that schools must develop a clear understanding of each driver in their unique context. The table below illustrates how ASIJ has adapted these drivers into our own context.
Coherence Framework Drivers Strategic Design Framework Dimensions
Focusing Direction
Cultivating Collaborative Cultures
Deepening Learning
Securing Accountability
Focusing Direction
Cultivating Adaptive Cultures
Designing Deep Learning
Measuring Success
Fullan and Quinn stress that effective schools provide a clear, compelling vision for where the school is going and why. The authors contend this involves being purpose-driven, setting meaningful goals, ensuring strategic clarity, and managing the change process effectively. The Focusing Direction dimension of our SDF draws inspiration from Simon Sinek’s “golden circle” concept, as outlined in his influential book, Start With Why (2011)13. At the heart of our vision is ASIJ’s Commitment to Know, Value, and Care for each student14 Our WHY centers on empowering students to thrive as responsible leaders and proactive contributors in a world that is increasingly complex and rapidly changing. Our HOW is inspired by Fullan and Quinn’s competency-based Deep Learning model. This model emphasizes the importance of enhancing students’ metacognitive abilities and engaging them with real-world, often transdisciplinary challenges that make learning relevant and meaningful. Our WHAT envisions the transformational experiences we hope to design and program for students over time. These experiences will be designed to develop students’ empathy, compassion, and respect for others; encourage learners to actively engage in their communities and assume responsibility for problems they did not create; inspire students to become proactive changemakers; and empower students to explore their interests and develop their passions.
See our Focusing Direction dimension here
13. Sinek, S. (2011). Start with why. New York City: Portfolio. Sinek argues that many companies and leaders focus on “what” they do, rather than “why” they do it, and that this leads to a lack of inspiration and direction. He suggests that by starting with the “why,” individuals and organizations can better understand their purpose and mission, and ultimately achieve greater success.
14. At the center of the ASIJ crest is our Commitment to “Know, Value, Care” (KVC). This emerged from surveys and interviews with students, alumni, and parents who explained that their most indelible memories of ASIJ concerned a patient, caring teacher or coach who took time to know them as individuals, value what was unique or different about them, and care about their wellbeing and success. Our Commitment flows into our Mission. When a student feels known, valued, and cared for in a safe community that emphasizes learning, curiosity, and originality, they are inspired to be “their best selves, empowered to make a difference.” Students and alumni reported that because an ASIJ teacher patiently knew, valued, and cared for them, they were motivated to give their best effort in all endeavors. Giving their best effort created an awareness of their own capacity and potential, which in turn strengthened their integrity and internal drive to achieve. Alumni reported that knowing “their best selves” reinforced their sense of responsibility to others, which resulted in feeling “empowered to make a difference.”
See our Designing Deep Learning dimension here
Fullan and Quinn’s collaboration in Deep Learning (2018) introduced the competency-based Deep Learning framework as one of the four dimensions on ASIJ’s SDF15. This model orients ASIJ away from a traditional model of teaching and learning toward a learning-progressive model sensitive to the needs of modern learners. Our journey toward Deep Learning began in the 2017-18 school year when our faculty collectively developed a Definition of Learning16 grounded in constructivist principles. In our effort to shape a nuanced N-12 learner profile that promoted student agency and higher-order cognitive skills, ASIJ became one of the first international schools in the world to join New Pedagogies for Deep Learning (NPDL)17, the global network of schools founded by Fullan and Quinn. ASIJ’s partnership with NPDL resulted in the development of our N-12 Portrait of a Learner. Explicit teaching of these competencies, in contexts where students engage in the study of authentic, real-world problems, is what ASIJ means when it refers to Deep Learning. We also provide a side-by-side comparison of teaching and learning models in which we stress the phrase “teacher-framed, student-led” and elaborate on what it means for ASIJ.
15. Definition of Learning – Approved by ASIJ Board of Directors as Policy #2100 in February 2020.
16. New Pedagogies for Deep Learning – Access to public website is available in the annotated bibliography.
17. N-12 Portrait of a Learner – Approved by ASIJ Board of Directors as Policy #2200 in May 2020.
Teacher-directed
Teacher decides what’s important to know; transmits knowledge to students
Student receives knowledge; remembers
Risk-taking is discouraged as students pursue moment-intime grades; students are conditioned to avoid failure
Learning is compliance-oriented, driven by grades
Learning focuses on product or outcome, not on process
Teacher is a passionate subject area specialist
Learning is siloed in traditional subject areas
Portrait of a Learner competencies are considered soft skills that students practice generally without explicit instruction or guidance
Learning is impersonal
Intelligence viewed as the ability to learn and remember
Student-led; teacher-framed
Teacher engages students through opportunities to explore authentic, real-world issues and challenges
Student constructs understanding through inquiry, problemsolving, and experimentation
Risk-taking is incentivized as students are rewarded for developing novel ideas; students embrace failure as learning
Learning prioritizes curiosity and rewards student agency
Learning focuses on process, confident that product or outcome will follow
Teacher combines passion for subject area with deep interest in metacognition and how human beings learn
Learning embraces transdisciplinary opportunities
Portrait of a Learner competencies are prioritized through experiences and explicit instruction that allow students to develop skills embedded in each learning progression
Learning connects meaningfully to student interest
Intelligence viewed as the ability to rethink, iterate, and even unlearn
See our Models of Teaching and Learning here
Fullan and Quinn emphasize the critical role of nurturing cultures of engagement in schools, where shared goals, commitments, and responsibilities bring stakeholders together, which is why Cultivating Adaptive Cultures appears as one of our SDF dimensions. This principle is infused across ASIJ through the professional standards frameworks created and tailored for various roles. These frameworks, which are custom-built to advance SDF priorities, articulate the professional culture we aspire to at ASIJ. All frameworks are grounded in our Commitment to Know, Value, and Care, our willingness and effectiveness as collaborators, and our responsibility to implement Deep Learning in our work with students. The addition of “adaptive” into this SDF dimension is a response to the accelerated pace of change, as discussed in Chapter 2. In this age of rapid change, maintaining an agile culture that proactively embraces new challenges is essential. This agility necessitates a continuous reevaluation of our norms, values, assumptions, and beliefs to ensure they align with and effectively respond to the changing needs of our students, fostering an environment where both students and educators thrive amidst ongoing transformation.
Fullan and Quinn underscore the importance of fostering cultures of accountability in schools, where all stakeholders are united in advancing institutional priorities. This involves embracing both internal and external measures to demonstrate progress and success effectively. At ASIJ, our approach to measuring success draws inspiration from Todd Rose’s insights18 on individual variability and Adam Grant’s recent work on uncovering and nurturing human potential19. Measuring Success appears as one of the dimensions of our SDF. We are committed to developing innovative methods that accurately capture and celebrate each student’s unique journey and accomplishments. Moving beyond the constraints of a one-size-fitsall educational model, we aim for a nuanced understanding of each student’s growth and development over time. Leveraging new A.I. technologies, we see groundbreaking opportunities to enhance our measurement tools, offering a more personalized and holistic view of success. This approach aligns with our dedication to Knowing, Valuing, and Caring for each student who attends ASIJ, ensuring our efforts to measure success are as diverse and dynamic as our students themselves.
Michael Fullan’s seminal work on educational change and his Coherence Framework have been instrumental in shaping ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework, providing a robust foundation for systemic transformation towards a more engaging, competency-based model of learning. By integrating Fullan’s insights on our four dimensions – Focusing Direction, Cultivating Adaptive Cultures, Designing Deep Learning, and Measuring Success–ASIJ has reoriented its pedagogical approach to provide students with greater agency by developing the skills they will need to navigate the complexities of the 21st century. This alignment with Fullan’s work supports ASIJ’s commitment to fostering an adaptive and innovative educational environment that prioritizes Deep Learning, student agency, and community engagement, ensuring the school remains at the forefront of educational excellence and innovation.
See our Measuring Success dimension here
18. Rose, T. (2016). The End of Average: Unlocking our potential by embracing what makes us different. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. A 2022 ASIJ summer read, Rose uses stories and science to show that in fact nobody is “average” and identifies how to help each unique individual meet their potential through a more individualized approach to problem-solving and systems.
19. Grant, A. (2023). Hidden Potential. New York: Penguin Random House LLC. Grant advocates for a shift towards more personalized, strengths-based approaches to education, highlighting the importance of recognizing and nurturing the unique potential of individuals, especially those who are frequently overlooked or marginalized.
We recognize ASIJ students need to become more adaptable and resilient in order to face challenges with resolves and courage.
In recent years, schools have been challenged to confront an array of crises, most notably the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing them into a continual state of adaptation and change. Against this backdrop, the principles of Adaptive Leadership, developed at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government by Ronald Heifetz and Marty Linsky, have found a new and urgent relevance in schools. Traditionally applied in business and organizational contexts, Adaptive Leadership fosters agility and encourages a proactive, opportunity-based mindset, which is a departure from the rigid, goal-based school improvement plans featured in most schools since the 1990s. The approach complements Michael Fullan’s research on the right drivers of change and empowers schools to navigate the complexities of today’s world with increased resilience and creativity, transforming challenges into catalysts for growth and innovation. As schools worldwide strive to adapt to the rapidly evolving demands of the 21st century, Adaptive Leadership provides a valuable framework for developing a more adjustable and contextsensitive strategy.
In The Practice of Adaptive Leadership (2009)20, Heifetz, Linsky, and their coauthor Alexander Grashow differentiate between technical problems and adaptive challenges. Solutions to technical problems are mostly additive, involving the adoption of approaches based on existing knowledge. The authors define adaptive challenges, on the other hand, as those requiring the transformation of stakeholders’ values, behaviors, roles, and default practices. As we outlined in Chapter 2, the external forces with which schools must grapple are many, and most of these involve adaptive challenges, not technical problems that can be addressed by adopting a new pre-packaged curriculum or program. At ASIJ, we are embracing principles of Adaptive Leadership to cultivate an organizational culture that is more resilient, dynamic, and inclusive to the rapidly changing educational landscape we are experiencing. In our Strategic Design Framework, we call this Cultivating Adaptive Cultures.
20. Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. The authors provide a guide on leading transformative change, focusing on diagnosing the complex challenges at hand, intervening skillfully, and mobilizing people to tackle complex problems while withstanding the pressures that accompany change.
Once a challenge is recognized as adaptive, Heifetz, Grashow, and Linsky (2009) contend that an organization must have the courage to ‘name elephants’. This metaphor concerns the willingness to identify and openly discuss unspoken assumptions; priorities or values that may be outdated; ways of working that are adult-centric; disparate understandings of professional roles or purposes; and unquestioned systemic defaults and cultural norms. Every organization has elephants; healthy schools are willing to engage in candid, reflective dialogues that identify when ‘elephants’ are significant barriers to change. This work fosters cultures of transparency and respectful candor that is often uncomfortable for those invested personally in the organization’s status quo. It also demands that individuals are willing to hold themselves accountable for engaging in the work and collectively owning the change process. In an era marked by rapid change and uncertainty, the ability to name and address our underlying challenges is not just a strategic decision—it’s an imperative for ensuring that ASIJ remains a dynamic, forward-thinking leader in education, focused unapologetically on making sure we are understanding and adapting to the evolving needs of our students.
Embracing Adaptive Leadership at ASIJ has meant cultivating adaptive cultures where change is not only anticipated but embraced as an opportunity for growth and innovation. This approach requires a shift from top-down strategic initiatives to a more collaborative, engaging process where faculty, students, and the wider community–parents, alumni, and our valued learning partnerships–are active participants in shaping ASIJ’s future. By valuing diverse perspectives and fostering a sense of collective ownership, ASIJ is cultivating adaptive cultures capable of navigating the challenges and seizing the opportunities presented by a rapidly evolving educational paradigm. Key aspects of such adaptive cultures include our shared commitment to learning, our willingness to place our students’ evolving needs over our own preferred ways of working, and our willingness to be accountable and hold others accountable.
The integration of Adaptive Leadership principles into ASIJ’s professional culture promises to significantly enhance our understanding of the adaptive challenges we are facing. The approach encourages cultures of innovation and shared accountability, develops leadership capacity across all levels of the school, and strengthens our collective resilience. As we confront the shifting paradigms of education, Adaptive Leadership not only positions ASIJ to navigate these changes effectively but also to emerge as a leader of progressive, impactful education in the 21st century.
Our Strategic Design Framework aims to empower students to thrive as accountable leaders and positive difference-makers, willing to embrace the world’s complexities with joy and purpose.
Video: “What we learned from Dr Hansen’s visit”
Dr Hansen’s The Future of Smart (2021), her appearances on our virtual parent engagement series ASIJ 2030, and her week-long visit in January 2024 have created considerable reflection within our community. Dr Hansen’s work resonates powerfully with ASIJ’s desire to re-think success through a liberatory lens informed by the evolving needs of modern learners. Her advocacy for a human-centered education model, which prioritizes the holistic development of learners and honors the diversity of each learner’s strengths, interests, and identities, echoes ASIJ’s commitment to fostering an inclusive, empathetic, and adaptable learning environment. Her approach, advocating for a shift away from traditional, narrow perspectives on academic achievement towards a model that embraces the complexity and diversity of human potential, has inspired ASIJ to deepen our commitment to the vision captured by our SDF. ASIJ recognizes our duty extends beyond preparing students academically and we resolve to help them become the compassionate, accountable leaders the world urgently needs.
At the heart of ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework lies our WHY: a deeplyrooted purpose to help all ASIJ students thrive and become accountable leaders and positive difference-makers in an increasingly complex, diverse, and rapidly changing world. This purpose resonates unmistakably with the humancentered educational model advocated by Dr Hansen. Her work makes clear that ensuring all students thrive requires that a school recognize, nurture, and cultivate each student’s unique strengths, interests, and potential. Further, in order to thrive in the VUCA world described in Chapter 2 it is imperative that all students have a deep understanding of their own identities, including how their life experiences influence their learning, values, and developing worldviews. Dr Hansen reinforces the importance of resisting traditional educational paradigms. She champions student-directed learning experiences that foster agency, permit risk-taking and independence, and develop complex metacognitive and pro-social skills that allow students to negotiate their places in the world, even as that world continues to change.
In his influential book Start With Why (2011), Simon Sinek explains that an organization’s WHY illuminates its purpose, cause, or belief, while its HOW outlines the actions that bring the WHY to life. ASIJ’s HOW involves knowing each learner (KVC) and developing their capacities to learn through six transdisciplinary competencies that they apply to authentic, real-world learning challenges (Deep Learning). This student-centered approach aligns closely with the core of Dr Hansen’s human-centered model, which prioritizes Relationships, Relevance, and Reintegration. Deep Learning moves beyond traditional educational models that focus narrowly on academic achievement. It compels students to forge meaningful connections, discover personal relevance in their learning, integrate their diverse insights into a unified worldview, and apply their learning in real-world contexts. This methodology complements Dr Hansen’s vision, mirroring the conviction ASIJ shares with the author that our programs and pedagogy must meet the evolving needs of modern learners and prepare them to face the future with empathy, resilience, and accountability.
Our WHAT—that students will experience a transformative education at ASIJ where they change over time and learn to act upon the world—mirrors the liberatory journey Dr Hansen describes in The Future of Smart. Our WHAT also reflects Brazilian educator Paulo Freire’s vision of education as a dynamic process where learners are not merely passive receptacles of knowledge but active agents of change. In challenging conventional learning paradigms and embracing the spectrum of human identity and development, ASIJ has embraced a vision of education that is inclusive, equitable, and profoundly humanizing. This vision commits to preparing students not solely for academic success but to cultivating well-rounded individuals who lead with integrity, empathy, and a deep-seated sense of social responsibility. Our WHAT, which is the tangible outcome of WHY and HOW, stands as a testament to our commitment to fostering an educational environment that empowers students to both transform themselves and the world around them, resonating with the perspectives of both Dr Hansen and Freire.
The alignment between Dr Hansen’s human-centered model and ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework is both profound and reaffirming. We share with Dr Hansen a commitment to reimagine the future of education. As ASIJ continues to integrate Dr Hansen’s research into our strategic planning and everyday practices, we act upon our dedication to an educational model that is inclusive, innovative, and responsive to the needs of every learner and the future they will face. In embracing Dr Hansen’s liberatory approach, ASIJ is not just preparing students for the challenges and opportunities of the future; we are actively participating in shaping that future, ensuring our students emerge as leaders capable of envisioning and creating a more equitable, compassionate world.
Our Strategic Design Framework reimagines the priorities of a 21st-century education and challenges ASIJ to accept its role as a leading international school choosing to lean courageously into change. Grounded in the research and expertise of figures like Michael Fullan and Dr Hansen, we have crafted an adaptable strategic vision that embraces and does not shy away from the challenges we know our students will face. Our intent in this chapter is to show how ASIJ is thinking about its own evolution during these dynamic, fast-moving times. Our goal has been to share the most important underpinnings of our SDF and demonstrate unequivocally how much informed, intentional thought supports this vision. We hope readers who are stakeholders of our community–alumni, faculty, parents, and students–will take pride in knowing how committed ASIJ is to serving our students and community well and to adapting to their evolving needs.
One feature of an ASIJ education is the priority we place on learning partnerships. We want our students frequently interacting with and learning from professional mentors working in different fields.
Dr Hansen, speaking to ASIJ High School students during a January 2024 visit.
Chapter Four
How does
future vision for its Chofu campus inspire and deepen opportunities to advance the Strategic Design Framework?
Envisioning a future of excellence: ASIJ at dusk with
Offering potential transformative opportunities for generations, heralding a future rich with potential.
ASIJ has maintained a reputation as one of the leading international schools in both Japan and the world for over 120 years. Our work with Ennead Architects signals a leap towards marrying our heritage with our attention to the evolving landscape of education. The vision is not merely a renovation; it’s a bold reimagining of an ASIJ education designed to spark innovation, foster community, and produce a thriving, well-balanced student body. It is driven by our Strategic Design Framework, which equips ASIJ to navigate the confluence of factors now catalyzing a paradigm shift in education.
The transformative journey of ASIJ’s Chofu campus is rooted in our strategic partnership with Ennead Architects, whom we selected for their experience and success designing transformative spaces that realize schools’ learning aspirations. This collaboration, initiated during the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, began with deliberate consideration of ASIJ’s need to align its future facilities with a modern educational vision. Ennead sought to deeply understand the principles of our Strategic Design Framework before developing a plan for a campus that will not only meet the evolving needs of our students but will also inspire creativity and interconnected learning. We believe Ennead’s inspired work sets a new benchmark for educational environments, marking a significant milestone in ASIJ’s history and paving the way for an era of unprecedented educational excellence and innovation.
Central to our vision is the decision to reimagine our future campus as academic or athletic neighborhoods, a strategic design choice sensitive to our obligation to provide a holistic education. The academic neighborhoods Ennead proposes are poised to become vibrant intellectual hubs, equipped with flexible classrooms and collaborative spaces designed to foster creativity and Deep Learning. Simultaneously, the athletic neighborhood will emphasize physical well-being and teamwork through state-of-the-art facilities. This division not only optimizes our campus for a holistic educational experience but also aligns seamlessly with our commitment to nurturing well-rounded individuals ready to navigate the complexities of the modern world.
Together with Ennead Architects, we picture a campus with a strong emphasis on sustainability and community, integrating green design principles to envision a campus that respects the environment and fosters connection with the natural world. Ennead has planned extensive green areas and communal learning spaces that encourage outdoor learning and interaction. These areas serve as the heart of campus life, promoting a sense of belonging within the ASIJ community. This thoughtful integration of environmental stewardship and communal values underpins ASIJ’s mission to prepare students as accountable leaders and positive difference-makers who will strive to be their best selves.
Video: Ennead Architects’ vision for A River of Learning
Classroom spaces redefine and inspire learning. Natural light and flexible design promote collaboration, innovation, and self-directed learning.
Our master plan has six phases and is designed to develop modern, purposebuilt facilities over time with minimal disruption to daily operations. In every way possible, Ennead has endeavored to minimize the impact of construction. Significantly, the initial phases promise to enrich the educational journey of our youngest learners—those students currently in the Early Learning Center or our Elementary School. These students will benefit profoundly when they one day walk the corridors of ASIJ’s new High School and learn in its classrooms. It should be noted that Phase 1 will include the development of state-of-the-art performing, visual, and digital arts facilities, which we anticipate will open new programs, opportunities, and experiences for our students. With Phase 2 and the completion of our new athletic neighborhood, students from all divisions will benefit from facilities that we anticipate few schools in the world will match. Each phase of our master plan will deepen and amplify the vision of our Strategic Design Framework, providing transformative experiences for every ASIJ student—in the classroom, the playing field or court, on the stage, or in the recording studio.
Ennead Architects’ meticulous design of new classrooms, arts, and athletics spaces supports ASIJ’s vision of modern learning. These facilities are imagined as catalysts for Deep Learning and collaboration, outfitted with the latest technology and adaptable spaces to support diverse learning styles and teaching methods. This blend of innovation and flexibility manifests our Strategic Design Framework, setting the stage for a future where ASIJ students are well-prepared for the complexities and opportunities of the modern world. The redevelopment of ASIJ’s campus is poised to profoundly impact our programming and community. We envision enhanced opportunities for transdisciplinary learning and personalized education, supported by cutting-edge technology and flexible classrooms. Moreover, the creation of communal spaces and green areas will fortify our community, fostering collaboration and a shared sense of belonging that is pivotal to our vision of a future-focused education.
Transforming learning: Campus architecture itself becomes a dynamic tool for sustainability education, providing students with the opportunity to study and explore.
Our Strategic Design Framework reimagines the priorities of a 21st-century education and challenges ASIJ to accept its role as a leading international school choosing to lean courageously into change. Grounded in the research and expertise of figures like Michael Fullan and Dr Hansen, we have crafted an adaptable strategic vision that embraces and does not shy away from the challenges we know our students will face. Our intent in this chapter is to show how ASIJ is thinking about its own evolution during these dynamic, fast-moving times. Our goal has been to share the most important underpinnings of our SDF and demonstrate unequivocally how much informed, intentional thought supports this vision. We hope readers who are stakeholders of our community–alumni, faculty, parents, and students–will take pride in knowing how committed ASIJ is to serving our students and community well and to adapting to their evolving needs.
ASIJ’s new athletics neighborhood promises world-class facilities for the next generation of student-athletes at ASIJ.
Chapter
Five
How does ASIJ benchmark against global and local standards to ensure we are meeting the evolving needs of our students and community?
For more than a century, ASIJ has been a premier international school in Japan and has earned a reputation as one of the leading international schools in the world. This acclaim is a testament to ASIJ’s enduring commitment to adapt to meet our students’ evolving needs. As we embark on a master plan to upgrade or replace facilities on our Chofu campus, our commitment to excellence through adaptation is more critical than ever. It is not enough for ASIJ to rest on past achievements or accolades; instead, we are focused on the future, recognizing our responsibility to both present and future generations of ASIJ students.
This chapter explores how ASIJ systematically navigates the complex landscape of international education, identifying key trends, challenges, and opportunities that shape our strategy. ASIJ benchmarks annually against top international schools globally and those located in Japan. Through this work, we align our educational programs with the latest global trends and ensure our financial and operational systems are robust. Our commitment to transparency and continuous improvement underscores our fiduciary duty to ASIJ’s community, reinforcing our mission to nurture empathetic leaders equipped for the dynamic challenges of tomorrow. By steadfastly focusing on both educational excellence and financial sustainability, ASIJ is poised to embrace new opportunities and adapt to an everchanging global environment.
ASIJ is committed to excellence through a continuous process of benchmarking against the highest local and global standards. To ensure our educational programs and financial strategies are aligned with industry best practices, we rely on a diverse set of highly-respected resources. These organizations provide ASIJ with the latest trends, data, and insights influencing international schools in Japan and worldwide. Our strategic planning benefits from this wealth of information, guiding our decisions to maintain and enhance our leadership position in local, regional, and global networks.
ISC Research is the leading organization collecting and analyzing data and trends from K-12 English-medium international schools worldwide. ISC identifies global, regional, and local trends and generates a market intelligence report for Japan.
Japan Market Expansion Competition (JMEC) is a Tokyo-based nonprofit offering market analyses across industries. ASIJ commissioned JMEC to provide competitive analyses for our ELC (2022) and Chofu campuses (2023), which help us understand our position.
The International Baccalaureate Organization is a well-respected authority among international schools. ASIJ monitors IBO developments even while we are not an IBDP school.
East Asia Regional Council of Schools (EARCOS) connects international schools across Asia. ASIJ’s association with EARCOS allows us to stay abreast of educational trends and benchmark our tuition, salary, and benefits against the sixteen other EARCOS Large Schools Group schools.
Search Associates and ISS are two of the leading recruitment agencies worldwide. Through both agencies, ASIJ is able to gain insights into global recruiting trends.
Japan Council of International Schools (JCIS) is the premier association for Englishmedium international schools in Japan. ASIJ benchmarks its tuition, salary, and benefits against JCIS schools that participate in annual surveys, which helps us stay abreast of trends in Japan.
The OECD, World Economic Forum (WEF), and McKinsey & Company are sources of global educational intelligence, offering insights into evolving school practices and market trends.
The College Board administers Advanced Placement, SAT, and PSAT exams. ASIJ is also able to track college admissions trends reported through the College Board.
The Enrollment Management Association (EMA) provides admissions insights and SSAT administration, supporting ASIJ and other schools in optimizing enrollment their admissions strategies
The Association for the Advancement of International Education (AAIE) promotes best practice across international schools. AAIE provides a global network for benchmarking, connecting heads of school.
The National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) provides ASIJ with insights into trends and strategies specifically among US independent schools, enhancing our perspective on trends in US-based schools.
The Western Association of Schools & Colleges (WASC) provides ASIJ’s accreditation. This recognition validates our diploma, signaling to colleges that an ASIJ education adheres to the highest educational standards.
ASIJ engages in rigorous benchmarking with leading international schools worldwide and select independent schools in the United States to ensure we are meeting the highest international standards. This strategic comparison serves several critical purposes:
To recruit and retain outstanding teachers, ASIJ needs a compensation package that is competitive with those offered by peer institutions globally. By closely monitoring the salaries and benefits of these schools, we adjust our package to ensure we remain highly competitive.
ASIJ is committed to delivering an outstanding education without becoming elitist and prohibitively expensive. We carefully observe tuition trends among top international schools. This vigilance helps us balance the drive for financial sustainability with the desire to remain accessible and equitable.
ASIJ evaluates our programs, resources, and facilities against other top schools, including those offering the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. This helps us guide our investments in ASIJ’s curricular and co-curricular offerings. This benchmarking informs our strategic decisions, ensuring our programs are informed by the best in global education.
In recent years ASIJ has participated in benchmarking analysis that involved the exchange of detailed salary and benefits data with the schools below. Conducted under strict confidentiality, financial benchmarking information, which is shared openly with ASIJ’s Board of Directors and Finance Committee, this plays a crucial role in our financial strategy and decision-making process.
International School of Beijing
International School of Amsterdam
American School of London
School
International
EARCOS Large Schools Group
International School of Kuala Lumpur
International Schools (not EARCOS LSG)
Independent Schools in US and Australia
United Nations International School
NIST International School
International School of Bangkok Singapore American School
Jakarta Intercultural School UWCSEA (Singapore)
Western Academy Beijing
Nanjing International School
Seoul Foreign School
Shanghai American School
Concordia International School (Shanghai)
Hangzhou International School
Taipei American School
American International School of Guangzhou
Canadian
International School of Hong Kong
Chinese International School (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Academy
International School
Manila
Hong Kong International School
Independent Schools Foundation Academy Cranbrook School Sydney
Melbourne Grammar School
Within Japan, ASIJ engages in a targeted benchmarking process with top Englishmedium international schools, specifically those affiliated with the Japan Council of International Schools (JCIS). This focused benchmarking serves several important purposes:
Central to maintaining the high standard of an ASIJ education is our commitment to offering highly competitive salaries. ASIJ aims to provide the highest compensation among premium international schools in Japan. This ensures we can attract and retain the highest caliber teachers.
Navigating Japan’s regulatory landscape, especially regarding the national pension and health care system (Shigaku Kyosai), is critical. With other JCIS schools, we explore innovative solutions to finance these obligations and enhance our benefits package, in an effort to fulfill our obligation to serve ASIJ’s faculty well.
By monitoring the fee structures of other JCIS member schools, ASIJ ensures our tuition does not become financially inaccessible and that we continue to provide families with a great value for the exceptional education we provide our students.
Recognizing the important role of our support staff in our success, ASIJ benchmarks compensation for these positions against local international school peers to ensure our offers are among the most attractive in Tokyo.
To maintain and enhance our extensive co-curricular programs, competitive stipends for roles such as coaching and club supervision are crucial. Benchmarking with JCIS schools helps us to guarantee our stipends reflect the value we place on these positions.
In Spring 2023, ASIJ engaged in a benchmarking survey with 23 of the 27 schools in the Japan Council of International Schools (JCIS) network. This confidential exchange of detailed financial data was critical to our benchmarking efforts within Japan. It equipped our Board of Directors and Finance Committee with the critical insights needed to navigate the delicate balance of recruiting and retaining outstanding educators with competitive compensation, while concurrently crafting a long-range tuition strategy that remains sensitive to market tolerances. Our goal is to sustain ASIJ’s excellence in teaching without becoming prohibitively expensive, ensuring we continue to welcome a diverse community of families, not only the most affluent.
ASIJ’s welcoming environment, our outstanding students, and the competitive salary we offer are among the reasons why top educators worldwide are drawn to the school.
ASIJ follows trends influencing international schools worldwide. The drivers listed on the right highlight why many families choose an international education for their children. The sequence of these trends is fluid, largely dependent on the local or national market in which a school operates. This list speaks to global trends, but all items are relevant to our Japan context. This list draws from the trusted sources outlined previously.
English as a Language of Instruction
Access to Higher Education
Parents choose English-medium international schools for immersive language learning, recognizing the pathway it creates to global higher education and career opportunities.
The demand for international schools stems from their globally recognized curricula and superior college counseling, which offer families a gateway to higher education opportunities, locally or globally.
Teacher Quality
Holistic Priorities & Wellbeing
Class Sizes & Student-teacher Ratios
Inclusive Education
Cross-cultural Fluency
Quality of Facilities
STEM, Innovation, & the Future of Work
Community
Well-regarded international schools recruit expatriate teachers with qualifications, skills, and experience aligned with the school’s curriculum and pedagogical model.
The holistic educational approach of international schools, which typically prioritizes student wellbeing and co-curricular involvement, resonates with families seeking a well-rounded education.
Smaller class sizes and favorable student-teacher ratios at most international schools are prized for enabling personalized attention and enhanced learning support.
Many families are drawn to the inclusive environment of international schools, where diverse learning needs are met with tailored support, fostering a community where every learner has greater opportunity to thrive.
International schools emphasize cross-cultural competencies and global mindedness, which prepares students with the perspectives and skills necessary to succeed in a diverse global landscape.
Top international schools typically boast modern facilities that inspire teaching excellence and support specialized programs, from STEM to the arts and athletics.
By offering STEM opportunities, international schools equip students for the future of work, addressing parents’ desires for education that keeps pace with technological advancements.
The strong sense of community and active parent engagement at most international schools make them a preferred choice for expatriate and multicultural families seeking community, sometimes far from their home country.
Currency Exchange Rates
ASIJ closely follows trends unique to international schools based in Japan, including regulatory challenges, enrollment and tuition, and other financial considerations. The trends below highlight the challenges and opportunities many Japan-based international schools are experiencing. This list also draws from the trusted sources outlined previously.
The devalued JPY since early 2022 has made contract offers from Japan-based international schools less competitive internationally, which has negatively affected schools’ recruitment and retention of expatriate teachers. Further, the devalued JPY has increased our operational budget, specifically for items ordered from overseas.
• Tuition rates are climbing in Japan, reflecting the fact that tuition levels have not kept pace with other international schools outside Japan or independent schools in the United States over the last twenty years.
Rising Tuition Rates & SelfPaying Families
• Enrollment trends have shifted over the last 15 years with less turnover of families than schools experienced in the 1990s and early 2000s. As a result, schools report more long-term families and less space for international families posted to Japan for shorter terms.
• More families seeking an international school are likely to be self-payers. The traditional image of an American expatriate on a company-sponsored, short-term assignment represents a smaller proportion of the overall market. The result is a more price-sensitive consumer.
National Health & Pension Compliance
Compliance with Shigaku Kyosai, Japan’s national pension and health care system for independent schools, has created new pressures on Japan-based international schools to finance the transition and provide supplemental benefits commensurate with those offered at top international schools in the region and globally.
Labor Law Changes
Increased Early Childhood Competition
New
International School Openings
Boarding Demand Increase
Increasing Competition
Independent schools in Japan are adjusting to labor law reforms that originated in other industries. These well-intentioned reforms often focus on workplace equity, but can create financial or cultural challenges for not-for-profit schools.
Many parents can no longer rely on benefits from their employers for early childhood tuition and offerings for early years are increasing in the Tokyo market. This increased competition means families are more attuned to comparing program offerings and flexibility.
Growing interest in international schools has led to more competition, with new schools opening in a variety of locations across Japan.
Many schools report inquiries from families seeking a boarding option at a Japan-based international school. These families typically live in the region, but do not work in Japan.
Tokyo-based families have an increasing number of international school choices, especially for Elementary-aged students, which offer a broader range of program and curriculum offerings (IBDP, Montessori/Waldorf, IGCSE, STEM, etc.), locations, and price points. ASIJ is aware of at least 22 international schools in Tokyo, 14 of which offer K-12 placement, with new players coming into the market regularly.
ASIJ is keenly attuned to the evolving landscape of international education, particularly within the context of Japan. This awareness enables us to identify and leverage our unique strengths and opportunities, ensuring we continue to meet the high expectations of our community and position the school as a leader among international schools globally. The following list reflects the strengths and opportunities we aim to leverage in order to serve our students to the best of our ability.
Teacher Quality
History, Tradition, and Reputation
University Admissions
ASIJ’s commitment to excellence begins with our faculty. Beyond competitive compensation, we attract and retain educators who are not only passionate but also deeply committed to our innovative educational approach, as embodied in our Strategic Design Framework (SDF).
ASIJ has a rich history and reputation, both locally and internationally, which allows ASIJ to maintain our reputation as a leading international school.
Our longstanding relationships with universities worldwide underscore the recognized value of an ASIJ education, supported by our proactive engagement with college admissions officials each school year.
Test Scores
SDF & Focus on the Future
World-Class Facilities for Learning
ASIJ students’ exceptional performance on AP exams and standardized tests like the MAP, SAT, and ACT serves as a testament to our educational quality and reputation.
Years of thoughtful development have culminated in ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework, a bold and adaptable blueprint for school change that anticipates the future needs of our students and prepares ASIJ to be a leading school in navigating the current paradigm shift in education.
Our master plan envisions state-of-the-art, purpose-built facilities that will place ASIJ at the forefront of global education, inspiring innovative programming and new opportunities for what we can offer ASIJ students.
• Arts: New spaces for fine and performing arts will broaden opportunities in dance, filmmaking, music production, podcasting, fashion, design, woodworking, and metalworking.
• Athletics: Our new athletics complex will enhance our athletics programs, solidifying our status as a school with outstanding sports offerings.
• Design: While our CAD Center already stands out, the addition of new facilities will allow us to repurpose existing spaces to expand design and STEM opportunities for all students.
Size and Programming
Flexibility & New Signature Programs
As the largest JCIS school, ASIJ’s diverse, co-educational, non-denominational environment offers an extensive variety of curricular and co-curricular opportunities, attracting a broad spectrum of families.
Choosing to continue offering AP courses allows ASIJ unique flexibility and underscores our commitment to providing distinctive, personalized learning experiences that align with our educational ethos. In particular, we are proud of our developing signature programs that promise to differentiate students in the college admissions process.
Extensive Co-curricular Programs
An Inclusive Environment & Student Support
Early Learning Center (ELC)
Health & Safety
Safeguarding
Financial Stability
Demand from Japanese Families & Regulatory Environment
Enrollment & Admissions
Advancement, Endowment, Annual Fund
Technology
ASIJ offers a variety of co-curricular programs that enrich student life beyond the classroom. Our comprehensive offerings include athletics, dynamic fine and performing arts opportunities, and an array of clubs and service-related activities.
ASIJ’s journey toward greater inclusivity has resulted in our investment in resources and programs that support all learners. ASIJ prides itself on offering personalized learning support for students with different learning needs, maximizing the potential of each child within our capabilities.
Our ELC’s proximity to ASIJ families and purpose-built design make it an ideal starting point for students’ educational journeys at ASIJ.
ASIJ’s effective and swift response to the COVID pandemic exemplifies our dedication to health and safety, and our ability to face crises decisively. Our robust Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) systems enhance safety oversights and assessments.
ASIJ’s Safeguarding Program sets a global standard for child protection with thorough policies and staff training. This dedication ensures a secure, nurturing environment for every student.
ASIJ maintains a solid financial foundation with sound fiscal oversight and practices. This stability enables us to navigate challenges and seize opportunities for growth and impact.
More Japanese families may be seeking an international school education for their children, according to applications received across many schools. However, the distinction between Article 1 schools and Kakushu Gakko, and the specific regulations affecting eligibility of Japanese families for international schools, present unique challenges.
Our enrollment is strong and stable across both campuses, ELC and Chofu. We typically have 300 open seats each year across all grade levels. We typically have over 1,200 applications each year across all grade levels.
ASIJ enjoys donor support marked by growth in individual contributions and corporate sponsorships. We anticipate this support will be critical when we begin a capital campaign.
Our technological infrastructure is state-of-the-art and progressive, incorporating the latest advancements that support students and staff.
ASIJ’s comprehensive and strategic approach to benchmarking is more than a process—it’s a commitment to excellence and relevance in a rapidly changing world. Through rigorous comparison with top international and independent schools globally and within Japan, ASIJ not only meets but anticipates the evolving needs of our students and our community. By drawing upon a wide spectrum of highly-respected sources for the latest trends and insights, we ensure our educational programs and financial strategies are not only aligned with but often exceed best practices. This dedication to continuous improvement and strategic foresight positions ASIJ as a leader among international schools, ready to embrace the opportunities and navigate the challenges of the future.
ASIJ attracts educators who bring creativity and passion to their teaching, who are eager to work in a deeply student-centered school where we Know, Value, and Care for each on of our students.
Chapter Six
How have we advanced
and
what initiatives are we planning for the next few years?
Insights from Chapters 2 and 3 highlighted the evolving needs of modern learners and the forces driving our Strategic Design Framework (SDF) forward. We are inspired by the notion that we are shaping ASIJ’s future, which will in turn shape us. This chapter is a testament to our adaptive capabilities and our collective imagination, pushing us beyond the conventional to explore, experiment, and codesign a future state that reflects the deepest values and aspirations of our SDF.
This chapter contains infographics crafted by division leaders that showcase our strategic work over the last few years (2017-24) and dashboards that reflect our current and future initiatives over the next two years (2024-26). These infographics are dynamic and are intended to be updated periodically to accurately reflect our strategic evolution and achievements. They demonstrate our commitment to resilience, our capacity to handle uncertainty with a proactive stance, and our unwavering dedication to creating equitable and just futures for our students.
Our “Where We’ve Been” infographics celebrate the substantial groundwork laid in recent years and showcase the journey ASIJ has undertaken. These visuals not only document our adaptability and learning but also chart our strategic path forward. Our strategic dashboards forecast our priorities and plans for the coming year and are designed to be iterative and participatory. These documents invite ongoing dialogue and collaboration from our entire school community, allowing for updates and revisions throughout the academic year.
Early Learning Center Elementary School
Learning Office Partnerships Where
Middle School High School
Student Support Technology
ASIJ’s ability to promote itself as a premiere international school is grounded in our willingness to negotiate the turmoil, challenges, and opportunities of each generation for over 120 years.
Chapter 6 charts ASIJ’s journey from 2017, offering both reflection and foresight. Our “Where We’ve Been” infographics celebrate important initiatives across divisions and teams over time, illustrating our shared commitment to ASIJ’s SDF and willingness to adapt to the needs of our students. These efforts are foundational to our future work. Our strategy dashboards are dynamic, live documents that capture our future-focused strategic planning, embodying an adaptive approach informed by earlier chapters. Both sets of infographics, which are accessible via links provided, are co-constructed by our faculty and school leaders and capture how we are planning to meet the evolving needs of our students over the next few years.
Creativity: Student Designers Crafting Creativity for Clients.
Collaboration: Collaboration at the ELC
Communication: Kyogen: Respecting Tradition
Mindset: Finding Courage and Belonging Through Music
Sophomore Theo ‘26 and Sixth grader Ruilin ‘30 explore the strides and boundaries of designing for their elementary student clients. Theo’s Product Design class and Ruilin’s Design Technology class pushed them to find both the imagination and simplicity required to make clients happy, while also providing effective and high quality products.
The students at the ELC can teach us all a thing or two about collaboration. Josh Miles, one of the ELC’s Kindergarten teachers, helps us understand the process teachers have taken to develop programming around collaboration with and for their students.
Critical Thinking: What happens to our E-waste?
Ray ‘24 explores how his experience with Kyogen has shown him the importance of verbal and physical communication. The Ōkura Style of the art form has been taught at ASIJ for 46 years. Ray shares the impact of this on his own understanding of respect, and highlights the value of working with Masters steeped in these centuries old traditions.
The fifth graders are learning that being a global citizen can start with small choices in our everyday spaces. A year into students’ daily cleaning of the cafeteria, we hear from Piper ‘31 who shares about the perspective she’s gained in this practice, and her appreciation of the hard work of the kitchen staff which keeps the ‘heart of the school’ running.
Middle School choir students Myiesha ‘28 and Sena ‘29 share what it looks like in Ms Callender’s class to push past mental blocks in order to find the grit it takes to share your voice with the world. They help us understand that with the right safe-space and peer-support, choir is so much more that just singing. It becomes an opportunity to find courage, belonging, and personal resilience in order to thrive in middle school and beyond.
Have you ever wondered what happens to our technology once we’re done with it? MS Fighters for the Future members Christina ‘30 and Gile ‘30, spoke with our technology experts to break down the process. What decisions are impacted by environmental considerations? And where could we continue to grow as e-waste becomes an increasingly present issue in our world?
Framed by ten guiding questions, this annotated bibliography presents the extensive research that has informed important aspects of ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework (SDF).
1. What seminal texts have had the most profound influence on ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework?
2. How are schools like ASIJ beginning to rethink their purpose and how to meet the needs of modern learners?
3. How are developments in Artificial Intelligence influencing the priorities and programs of schools like ASIJ?
4. What new research on literacy and mathematics education is being investigated by schools like ASIJ?
5. What new research on human cognition and learning influences ASIJ’s philosophy and approach to student support?
6. Why are schools like ASIJ drawn to a human-centered model of education?
7. What research and literature informs ASIJ’s decision to adopt Deep Learning?
8. How is the landscape of college admissions changing?
9. What research on change leadership has informed ASIJ’s approach to strategic planning?
10. What sources inform ASIJ’s thinking about school governance?
Each citation includes a brief annotation that succinctly explains the value or importance of the resource, often with explicit reference to the SDF.
1. What seminal texts have had the most profound influence on ASIJ’s Strategic Design Framework?
Dr Hansen’s The Future of Smart provides a critical evaluation of a traditional model of education and emphasizes the need for a new approach. She argues that the current education system is poorly suited to the complexities of today’s world, including the challenges and opportunities posed by Artificial Intelligence. Dr Hansen believes that the traditional system’s fixation with a narrow interpretation of intelligence, standardized testing, and a one-size-fitsall approach has created a flattened and dehumanized idea of human capability. To address these issues, Dr Hansen advocates for a model that values the diversity of cognitive abilities and backgrounds students bring to their learning experiences. She suggests that a Human-Centered/Liberatory (HCL) model is the way forward, which promotes emotional intelligence, creativity, problem-solving skills, and neurodiversity. Dr Hansen believes that this approach is crucial to fostering a resilient and adaptive society. She underlines the importance of personalized learning pathways and suggests that truly liberatory approaches to education embrace the idea that each learner arrives at a different outcome and finds different ways to contribute to the world. This aligns with ASIJ’s SDF, which urges an educational paradigm that is inclusive, adaptable, and forward-looking. By adopting a human-centered model of education that values diversity and recognizes the potential of each student, ASIJ is committed to preparing learners for a rapidly evolving global landscape.
Fullan, Quinn, and McEachen advocate for an educational revolution that highlights essential global competencies, preparing students to significantly impact their surroundings. They challenge the status quo of education by promoting critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and communication—key skills for navigating the intricacies of a global community. This evolution from conventional teaching to a dynamic, learner-focused approach is defined by their six global competencies model: character, citizenship, collaboration, communication, creativity, and critical thinking. They assert the immediate need for action: “To thrive, not merely survive, students must become active participants in their education” (p. 89), calling on educators to cultivate settings where learners are encouraged to direct their educational paths. This strategy mirrors ASIJ’s SDF, focusing on crafting learning opportunities that equip students for the future and forge thoughtful global citizens eager to contribute positively to the world. Fullan and colleagues insist that this Deep Learning framework positions students to address complex global issues effectively, mirroring ASIJ’s dedication to developing individuals ready to make meaningful impacts in an interconnected, swiftly evolving global scene. Their blueprint emphasizes the importance of valuing diverse perspectives, fostering student agency, and realizing every student’s unique talents and potential to influence the future.
Fullan and Quinn outline a strategic vision for reimagining education through a unified and integrated approach to reform. They argue for the adoption of the Coherence Framework, a model designed to achieve profound and lasting change by prioritizing essential elements such as fostering collaborative cultures, building accountability through empowerment, and emphasizing the mutual growth of teachers and students. This framework advocates moving beyond isolated efforts to achieve systemic synergy, ensuring all aspects of the educational landscape align towards common goals. This framework inspires ASIJ’s SDF, underscoring the critical need for strategic clarity and coherence to fulfill our aspirations. Fullan and Quinn’s focus on cultivating collaborative environments and Deep Learning experiences aligns with ASIJ’s endeavors to nurture a culture of innovation, creativity, and collective responsibility. Their insights into effective leadership when navigating change reinforce the significance of concerted educational practices, where every member of the community contributes to a continual process of enhancement and learning. This guidance on achieving systemic coherence through shared vision and purpose mirrors ASIJ’s commitment to delivering comprehensive, learning-progressive education, highlighting the book’s pivotal influence on shaping an education system that anticipates and adapts to the needs of the future.
Robinson champions a vital shift in educational priorities, emphasizing the essential role of creativity and innovation in student learning. He critiques the prevailing status quo in education, which tends to prioritize standardized assessments and uniformity, arguing that such an approach suppresses the creative capacities of students, hindering their ability to engage in divergent thinking and address complex challenges. This perspective resonates deeply with ASIJ’s SDF, which places a high value on nurturing students’ abilities to think creatively, solve problems innovatively, and approach tasks with critical insight. Robinson advocates for an educational paradigm that positions creativity at the core of academic and personal success, reflecting ASIJ’s commitment to equip students for a future where inventive and analytical skills are paramount. He encourages educators to transform their pedagogy to unlock students’ creative potential, preparing them to meet the demands of the contemporary world with unique ideas and inventive solutions. In the context of a swiftly changing global environment, where conventional abilities are quickly outpaced, Robinson’s focus on fostering a creatively driven education aligns with ASIJ’s mission to cultivate a learning atmosphere that empowers students to pursue their interests and transcend traditional academic limits. His urgent call for educational systems to embrace creative learning reaffirms ASIJ’s dedication to an educational model that celebrates the individual.
2. How are schools like ASIJ beginning to rethink their purpose and how to meet the needs of modern learners?
Harari explores the pressing challenges and transformations shaping our world, from technology and politics to identity and education. His insights encourage ASIJ to foster a curriculum that not only addresses the immediate academic needs but also equips students with the critical thinking and adaptability required to navigate and influence an increasingly interconnected and rapidly changing global society. This approach ensures students are not only prepared for the future but are also capable of contributing positively to it, reflecting ASIJ’s commitment to developing informed, engaged, and accountable leaders and positive difference-makers.
Borba illuminates the crucial characteristics — resilience, empathy, and self-control — that distinguish students who flourish from those who merely strive in our complex, rapidly-evolving world. She argues that these traits are more predictive of future success than traditional academic achievements, urging a shift in educational focus toward fostering these skills. Borba’s research supports ASIJ’s holistic approach to education, where attention to student well-being and character development is foundational. Beyond supporting students as they gain admission into selective colleges, we see our purpose as helping them thrive in the future.
Dweck, C.S.
Dweck’s seminal work on growth mindset underscores the importance of embracing challenges, persisting through setbacks, and seeing effort as essential to mastering new skills. This perspective aligns seamlessly with ASIJ’s SDF, particularly in the value of fostering metacognitive reflection among students. It encourages learners to reflect on their thinking and understand that their abilities are not fixed but can be developed through practice and perseverance. We believe Dweck’s concept of a growth mindset, which permeates our constructivist, competency-based Portrait of a Learner framework, is a cornerstone of ASIJ’s SDF.
What other publications do we recommend?
Brown, B. (2019). Braving the wilderness: The quest for true belonging and the courage to stand alone. Random House Trade Paperbacks. Brown’s insights support ASIJ’s emphasis on authenticity and community, encouraging students to embrace their individuality while fostering a sense of belonging.
Christensen, C.M., Horn, M.B., & Johnson, C.W. (2017). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill Education. Christensen and colleagues apply the theory of disruptive innovation to education, proposing that technology will personalize and revolutionize learning.
Claxton, G. (2017). What’s the point of school?: Rediscovering the heart of education. Oneworld Publications. Claxton’s advocacy for cultivating learning agility and critical thinking in students speaks directly to the evolving needs of modern learners.
Damour, L. (2024). The emotional lives of teenagers: Raising connected, capable, and compassionate adolescents. Allen & Unwin. Damour’s insights into the emotional dynamics of adolescence provide a roadmap for nurturing connected, capable, and compassionate individuals.
Dintersmith, T. (2018). What school could be: Insights and inspiration from teachers across America. Princeton University Press. Dintersmith’s vision for educational transformation aligns with ASIJ’s efforts to engage and prepare students for their futures through Deep Learning.
Goodall, J., Abrams, D. C., & Hudson, G. (2022). The book of hope: A survival guide for trying times. Penguin. Goodall’s message of hope and resilience inspires ASIJ’s commitment to nurturing global responsibility, accountability, and optimism among ASIJ’s students.
Haidt, J. (2024). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Allen Lane, an imprint of Penguin Books. Haidt’s exploration of the rising mental health challenges among youth underscores the importance of proactive and compassionate support systems in schools.
Kolbert, E. (2022). Under a white sky: The nature of the future. VINTAGE. Kolbert’s exploration of technological solutions to environmental problems enriches ASIJ’s sustainability education, highlighting the ethical dilemmas of human intervention in nature.
Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2019). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Books. Lukianoff and Haidt critique the effects of overprotection and echo chambers in education, advocating for resilience and exposure to diverse viewpoints.
Mack, O., Khare, A., Kramer, A., & Burgartz, T. (2016). Managing in a VUCA World. Springer. This collection provides insights into navigating complexity and uncertainty, paralleling ASIJ’s focus on preparing students to think critically and adapt in a rapidly changing world.
O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J.O. (2022). The misinformation age: How false beliefs spread. Yale University Press. This work’s exploration of misinformation dynamics aligns with ASIJ’s commitment to teaching students how to evaluate information, discern, and think critically about its impact.
Raworth, K. (2022). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Penguin. Raworth’s sustainable economic model offers a compelling framework, which emphasizes economic justice and environmental sustainability.
Richardson, W. (2023). One foot in the future. Big Questions Institute. https:// bigquestions.institute/onefootebook/. Richardson urges schools to anticipate and prepare for future shifts by integrating future thinking and regenerative design into education.
Ripley, A. (2018). The smartest kids in the world. Simon & Schuster. Ripley’s investigative journey into the education systems of countries with high-performing students provides actionable insights for ASIJ, highlighting the importance of rigorous learning, teacher quality, and student agency.
Sachs, J.D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press. Sachs’ comprehensive overview supports ASIJ’s integration of the UN Sustainable Development Goals into our curriculum, addressing not only environmental issues but also societal inequity.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Portfolio Penguin. Schwab’s examination of emerging technologies’ societal and economic impacts aligns with ASIJ’s focus on preparing students with the skills to thrive in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Stixrud, W. R., & Johnson, N. (2019). The self-driven child: The science and sense of giving your kids more control over their lives. Penguin Books. This book’s emphasis on autonomy and purpose aligns with ASIJ’s focus on empowering students to take charge of their learning and well-being.
Susskind, R.E., & Susskind, D. (2022). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press. The Susskinds’ insights into the digital transformation of professions guide ASIJ in adapting its curriculum to prepare students for future professional competencies and demands.
Thunberg, G. (2021). No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin. Thunberg’s speeches inspire ASIJ to empower students to advocate for the planet, reflecting the school’s commitment to environmental education.
Wagner, T., & Dintersmith, T. (2016). Most likely to succeed: Preparing our kids for the innovation era. Simon & Schuster. The authors challenge traditional educational models, urging schools to adapt teaching methods for a rapidly changing world.
Westover, T. (2022). Educated. Penguin Books. Westover’s compelling narrative highlights the transformative power of education as a journey of self-discovery and resonates with ASIJ’s commitment to empowering students to take ownership of their educational journeys.
Zhao, Y. (2018). Reach for Greatness: Personalizable Education for All Children. Corwin. Zhao’s advocacy for personalized education aligns with ASIJ’s desire to shift from standardization to a learning environment that celebrates individuality and cultivates unique strengths.
Stewart, A., Raz, G., & Zomorodi, M. (Hosts). (2012-Present). TED Radio Hour NPR
Listen
Dubner, S. J. (Host). (2009-Present). Freakonomics Freakonomics Radio
Listen
Edelman, C. R., & Lush, E. (Hosts). (2016-present). Global GoalsCast. How To Academy
Listen
Abdelfatah, R., & Arablouei, R. (Hosts). (2019-present). Throughline. NPR
This podcast series explores ideas, inventions, and new ways to think and create, featuring episodes based on TED Talks that cover a range of subjects from education to technology, aligning with ASIJ’s emphasis on innovation and creativity.
This podcast delves into topics related to economics, social sciences, public policy, and education, offering unique perspectives that complement ASIJ’s focus on critical thinking and problem-solving.
This podcast series highlights inspiring stories and efforts to advance the UN Sustainable Development Goals, featuring interviews with leaders and activists in fields such as climate change and gender equality.
This podcast delves into historical events to shed light on current global issues such as political instability and economic inequality, offering insights into the complexities of our modern, interconnected world.
Robinson, K. (2006, Feb). Do schools kill creativity? TED Conferences.
Gore, A., Bulus, G. K., Firman, N., Loría, X., & Guinee, T. (2020, Oct). Climate change is our reality. Here’s how we’re taking action. TED Countdown.
Robinson’s compelling case for valuing diverse intelligences and fostering an environment where children can express their creativity aligns with the need for schools to adapt to the evolving needs of modern learners. This talk challenges educators to consider how schools can nurture rather than inhibit creativity.
Al Gore and other environmental activists address climate change, describing grassroots initiatives taken around the world. The talk emphasizes the importance of collective action in combating climate change and the role education can play in fostering agency and accountability.
Liu, E. (2019, Apr). How to revive your belief in democracy.
Liu underscores the importance of active participation in democracy and the power of individuals to effect change. His message supports ASIJ’s mission to develop informed, accountable citizens who are engaged and ready to contribute positively to democratic processes and global solutions.
Ali shares potent insights on maintaining hope during adversity, emphasizing resilience, community, and action as pillars for navigating challenges. His talk echoes ASIJ’s emphasis on fostering resilience, optimism, and perseverance when we are facing obstacles or other challenges.
3.
are
influencing the priorities and programs of schools like ASIJ?
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. Washington, DC.
This government publication underscores the importance of human oversight in the ethical and impactful use of A.I. in teaching and learning, aligning with ASIJ’s commitment to balance technology integration with human-centric education. This informs ASIJ’s strategy for adopting A.I. tools responsibly, ensuring they complement the school’s educational objectives and prepare students for a technologically advanced future where ethical considerations are paramount.
Kai-Fu Lee, the former president of Google China, and science fiction novelist Chen Qiufan offer imaginative and insightful explorations of A.I.’s potential impact over the next two decades, including education. This narrative drives critical reflection among ASIJ educators on how A.I. will shape teaching and learning, encouraging proactive engagement with emerging technologies to design future-ready educational programs that address A.I. integration’s ethical, social, and practical aspects.
Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. [Book]
One useful thing
https://www.oneusefulthing.org/ [Newsletter] More useful things. https://www.moreusefulthings.com/ [Website].
Mollick studies innovation and Artificial Intelligence. He shares his researchbased insights on the implications of A.I. in an email newsletter to subscribers. Many of his articles directly address the challenges, opportunities, and changes that A.I. brings to educational settings. Further, it is important to note Mollick’s strategies and ideas are not just theoretical but are backed by empirical data, which can be more effectively applied in educational contexts.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton & Company. This work underscores the need for creativity and empathy in a tech-driven future, resonating with ASIJ’s focus on preparing students with futureready skills.
Fengchun, M. & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. The guidance aims to support institutions implementing immediate actions and developing long-term policies to foster a human-centered vision of new AI technologies.
Fengchun, M. & Holmes, W. & Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/pcsp7350
Released long before the first public version of ChatGPT, this advice from UNESCO remains relevant, focusing on ensuring ethical, inclusive, and equitable use of AI in education, preparing humans to live and work with AI, and applying AI to enhance educational experiences.
Future Today Institute. (2024). 2024 tech trends report. This annual report identifies emerging trends in technology, including those relevant to education. School leaders can use these insights to anticipate and prepare for future changes in educational technology, as well as understanding the technological landscape our students will enter as adults, allowing them to prepare students better for future careers and societal challenges.
Hudson, E. Learning on purpose. https://erichudson.substack.com/ [Newsletter]. Educational consultant Eric Hudson publishes this email newsletter summarizing his work and research into usable, helpful insights for schools. His writing on A.I. and schools has been useful to ASIJ teachers as we work to keep humans in the loop and to teach children discernment.
Klopfer, E., Reich, J., Abelson, H., & Breazeal, C. (2024). Generative AI and K-12 education: An MIT perspective. In An MIT Exploration of Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.81164b06 The authors explore the transformative potential and challenges of integrating Generative A.I. into K-12 education, providing insights that align with ASIJ’s commitment to Leveraging Digital.
O’Gieblyn, M. (2022). God, human, animal, machine: Technology, metaphor, and the search for meaning. Anchor Books. O’Gieblyn delves into the philosophical and existential questions raised by the advancement of technology, particularly artificial intelligence, and how these developments challenge our understanding of consciousness, identity, and the essence of life itself.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Artificial Intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/digital/artificial-intelligence/. [Website]. The OECD contends that Artificial intelligence will transform every aspect of human life. The website curates articles and videos that explore how A.I. influences how human beings live while also exploring the tradeoffs for governments and citizens alike.
Roose, K. (2022). Futureproof: 9 rules for humans in the age of automation. Random House, an imprint and division of Penguin Random House LLC. Roose, a technology columnist for The New York Times, shares insights and strategies for individuals and organizations to succeed in this new landscape. The book emphasizes the importance of retaining human qualities and values in the face of technological advancements rather than trying to outcompete machines by being more like them.
Tegmark, M. (2018). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Alfred A. Knopf. Tegmark’s discussion on A.I. offers insights for ASIJ on integrating technology to enhance learning, ensuring students are prepared for a future intertwined with A.I.
World Digital School Project (2023). From continuity of instruction to continuity of innovation. WDSP. The WDSP, a project supported by the US State Department, publishes annual playbooks that give helpful advice to schools. The August 2023 paper outlines the history and purpose of the project and guides schools on mitigating risks from cybersecurity and handling the challenges of A.I. in education.
World Economic Forum. Artificial Intelligence. https://www.weforum.org/topics/ artificial-intelligence-and-robotics/. [Website]. The WEF curates valuable resources on this website, allowing readers to explore A.I.’s far-reaching influence in educational and work contexts.
Roose, K. & Newton, C. (Hosts). (2022-present). Hard Fork. New York Times.
Klein, E. (Host). (2021-present). The Ezra Klein Show. New York Times.
This podcast series provides timely discussions on A.I.’s role in society, including education, making it a valuable resource for ASIJ to stay informed on the latest developments and their implications.
In addition to interviews with politicians and authors, Klein’s podcast frequently discusses Artificial Intelligence covering more than just technical aspects but also ethical, social, and political implications of A.I.
Safi, M.
This podcast series explores the ethical issues surrounding the use of algorithms and Artificial Intelligence systems, which are increasingly pervasive in the digital world.
This podcast series details the interdisciplinary research and innovation that propelled A.I. from theoretical concepts to practical applications and provides context for understanding A.I.’s capabilities and potential.
Khan, S. (2023, April). How AI could save (not destroy) education. TED.
SXSW. (2024, March 11). Amy Webb Launches 2024 Emerging Tech Trend Report at SXSW 2024. YouTube.
Khan contends in the TED Talk that A.I. could spark the most significant positive transformation education has ever experienced. He argues that students and educators will soon be able to use personalized A.I. tools effectively, including the potential of personal A.I. tutors for every student, while teachers will be able to have an A.I. teaching assistant. Khan demonstrates features for his educational chatbot, which is called Khanmigo.
Webb, CEO of the Future Today Institute and professor at NYU Stern School of Business, delivers a data-driven analysis of emerging tech trends, focusing on cutting-edge developments in Artificial Intelligence, robotics, the metaverse, and bioengineering. Her comprehensive overview offers critical insights that echo ASIJ’s conviction to leverage digital innovations responsibly and creatively.
Wolfram, S. (2023, October). How to think computationally about AI, the universe and everything. TED.
Bell, G. (2020, Oct). 6 big ethical questions about the future of AI.
TED Salon: Dell Technologies.
Drawing on his decades-long mission to formulate the world in computational terms, Wolfram delivers a profound vision of computation and its role in the future of A.I. WIth mesmerizing visuals depicting the underlying structure of the universe, he provides a sweeping survey of his life’s work, offering a new perspective on the applications — and consequences — of A.I. powered by computational language.
Bell delves into the ethical landscape of A.I.’s future, posing six critical questions that challenge us to think deeply about the integration of A.I. in society. Her insightful analysis resonates with ASIJ’s commitment to fostering ethical digital citizens, emphasizing the importance of preparing students to navigate and influence the ethical considerations of emerging technologies thoughtfully and responsibly.
4. What
research
literacy and mathematics education is being investigated by schools like ASIJ?
What books have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
Boaler, J., (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Tierney, R.J., & Pearson, P.D. (2024). Fact-Checking the Science of Reading: Opening up the conversation. Literacy Research Commons. https://literacyresearchcommons.org/
Stanford research and math educator Jo Boaler offers insights and practices to help all children learn, and see themselves as capable, in mathematics. She challenges the pervasive belief that math ability is innate and fixed and offers concrete approaches to move math beyond rote learning to make math learning deeper, more lasting, and more enjoyable so that each child unlocks their math potential and sees themselves as a mathematician.
The authors examine claims concerning the science of reading. They emphasize the complexity of reading instruction and scrutinize the limits of explicit systematic phonics instruction, balancing it against research that supports a multifaceted approach to reading that includes phonics as one component among many. They call for a nuanced understanding of reading education that respects the varied needs of learners and uses a broad spectrum of strategies.
Burkins and Yates offer a practical framework for integrating the science of reading with balanced literacy practices. They outline six key shifts aimed at revising common instructional strategies through the lens of scientific research and classroom application. This resource is designed to enhance educators’ understanding and implementation of quality literacy instruction by blending the research and concrete, evidencebased pedagogical practices.
Boaler, J. (2015, January 15). Fluency without fear: Research evidence on the best way to learn math facts. youcubed. https://www.youcubed.org/ evidence/fluency-without-fear/ Boaler’s article dismantles the myth that speed and memorization are key to math fluency, arguing for understanding and flexibility in learning math facts. It supports nurturing a love for math through engagement, inquiry, and constructivist approaches in alignment with Deep Learning at ASIJ. Bowers, J. S., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Beyond Phonics: The Case for Teaching Children the Logic of the English Spelling System. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 124-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1288571 The authors challenge the conventional phonics-based approach to literacy education, advocating instead for a comprehensive understanding of the English spelling system’s logic. They argue that effective literacy instruction should encompass not just phonics but also the intricate relationships between morphology, etymology, and phonology that underpin English spelling.
Calkins, L. (2019). No one gets to own the term Science of Reading. Teachers College Reading and Writing Project, Columbia University. https:// advancingliteracy.tc.columbia.edu/ Calkins argues for a balanced and inclusive approach to reading education, critiquing the monopolization of the term “Science of Reading.” Her perspective encourages a multifaceted literacy strategy. Though Caulkins has been criticized recently, a valuable perspective in ongoing discussions about “best practices” around literacy learning.
Dehaene, S. (2010). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. Penguin Books. Dehaene explores the cognitive neuroscience of reading, offering insights into how the brain processes language and suggesting pedagogical strategies that align with these natural learning pathways.
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Akhavan, N. L. (2019a). This is balanced literacy. Corwin. The authors present a framework for balanced literacy that integrates skill instruction with meaningful reading and writing experiences, advocating for a comprehensive literacy education.
Hanover Research (2017). best practices in math course sequencing and integrated math. This report examines traditional versus integrated math sequencing in mathematics and offers evidence-based recommendations for supporting diverse learners through an integrated approach.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2017). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding, engagement, and building knowledge, grades K-8. Stenhouse Publishers, Pembroke Publishers. Harvey and Goudvis provide practical strategies for enhancing comprehension across subjects, emphasizing critical thinking and knowledge-building.
Hegland, S. S. (2021, December 7). Beneath the Surface of Words Learning About Spelling. Retrieved from https://learningaboutspelling.com/2021/12/07/ beneath-the-surface-of-words/ Hegland embarks on a detailed exploration of the English spelling system and dissects the complex interplay of history, phonology, and morphology that shapes English orthography, aiming to demystify its perceived irregularities. She argues for an educational approach that transcends rote memorization, advocating for a methodology that encourages learners to question and understand the foundational principles behind word formation.
Kilpatrick, D.A. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Wiley. Kilpatrick offers detailed guidance on diagnosing and addressing reading difficulties, underscoring the importance of evidence-based interventions in reading education.
Liljedahl, P. (2019). Building thinking classrooms in mathematics, grades K-12: 14 teaching practices for enhancing learning. Corwin. Liljedahl introduces 14 teaching practices aimed at fostering active learning and deep understanding of mathematics through student-centered instructional practices.
National Research Council (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822 A foundational book on learning mathematics, of particular importance at ASIJ is the chapter focused on the 5 strands of mathematical proficiency that mathematical fluency, the focus of much tutoring, are adaptive reasoning, strategic competence, conceptual understanding, and productive disposition.
Principles to Actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. (2014). NCTM, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. This publication from NCTM provides actionable strategies for improving math education, advocating for equity and the development of each student in their mathematical thinking and abilities.
Scarborough, H.S. (2023). The reading rope: Key ideas behind the metaphor. The Reading League. https://www.thereadingleague.org/wp-content/ uploads/2023/11/TRLC-Educators-and-Specialists-The-Reading-Rope-Key-IdeasBehind-the-Metaphor.pdf Scarborough’s metaphor of the reading rope provides a powerful metaphor for the complexity of reading development, highlighting the intertwined skills necessary for literacy development in students.
WordWorks Kingston. (n.d.). Structured Word Inquiry. https://www. wordworkskingston.com/WordWorks/Structured_Word_Inquiry.html This page from the WordWorks Kingston website offers an in-depth look at the principles and practices of Structured Word Inquiry (SWI). This approach emphasizes the investigation of word structures, etymology, and morphology to enhance literacy teaching and learning.
Zager, T. (2017a). Becoming the math teacher you wish you’d had: Ideas and strategies from vibrant classrooms. Stenhouse Publishers. Zager offers inspiration and practical advice for teaching math with enthusiasm and depth, advocating for a student-centered, inquiry-based approach where each student develops both mathematical proficiency and belief in themselves as competent mathematicians.
Hanford, E.(Host). (2022, Oct–Nov). Sold a story. APM Reports. American Public Media. 1
This podcast series renewed debates about the “Science of Reading.” Hanford investigates the contentious debate over reading instruction, providing a platform for critical analysis, while shedding light on the impact of entrenched educational philosophies on student literacy outcomes. She offers listeners a comprehensive investigation of challenges and opportunities related to adopting evidence-based reading instruction.
Lambert, S. (Host). (2019-present). Science of Reading. Amplify Education.
Levitt, S. (Host). (2019, October 3). Freakonomics Radio, 391.
America’s Math Curriculum Doesn’t Add Up. Freakonomics Radio.
Lambert interviews experts on what the research says and how literacy is best taught in schools. Through engaging discussions, this podcast series sheds light on evidence-based practices in reading instruction, aiming to bridge the gap between research findings and classroom application, making it an essential resource for educators striving to enhance their literacy teaching methods in alignment with the latest scientific insights.
Levitt interviews Jo Boaler to interrogate the traditional “layer cake” approach to mathematics education following the Algebra, Geometry, Algebra II sequence. This episode examines conventional approaches to math education, exploring innovative methods that may change how students understand and engage with math. Boaler discusses the need for a curriculum that embraces real-world applications and fosters a growth mindset.
Hamilton, B. (2021, March). A Conversation with Dr. Jo Boaler: Stanford Professor. The Hamilton Review.
Hamilton interviews Boaler about the nuances of teaching and learning mathematics. Boaler challenges the prevalent belief that speed in learning and processing math equates to better understanding, advocating instead for depth over velocity. Highlighting her extensive experience and contributions, this interview offers insights for parents and educators alike, emphasizing the transformative power of thoughtful math instruction.
Seidenberg, M. S. (2023a, Dec 4). Where does the “Science of Reading” go from here? Presentation at the Yale Child Study Center.
Bedley, S. (2017). Discernment in the Era of Fake News. TED Conferences.
A well-researched and thoughtful examination of the science behind reading instruction and the gaps between what the research says and how educators (mis)interpret and (mis) implement the research.
Bedley tells the story of how he moved beyond checklists to establish the reliability of sources to identify “fake news” in order to help his students become “discerners of information rather than unconscious consumers.”
Meyer, D. (2010). Math class needs a makeover. TED Talk.
Meyer gives examples of how “paint-by-numbers’’ math learning keeps kids from developing the most important mathematical thinking skills, such as their ability to formulate problems and think deeply about math.
SERP Media. (2014). Phil Daro- Against “Answer-Getting.”
Daro, one of the primary authors of CCSS for Math, discusses math education around the world and reflects on the importance of students learning to reason mathematically, not merely “get the answers” quickly.
5. What new research on human cognition and learning influences ASIJ’s philosophy and approach to student support?
What books have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
Tucker and Novak address the challenges educators face, offering a new perspective on teaching that combines UDL with blended learning to alleviate pressures and enhance sustainability in the profession. The book deconstructs traditional teacher-led workflows, advocating for student-centered approaches that foster self-awareness, motivation, and self-regulation, aiming to transform students into expert learners.
Chardin and Novak contend teacher collaboration has the power to drive transformative change in schools. They further argue that by combining social justice and UDL, a vision for how to create equitable learning environments emerges where each student is known, valued, and cared for and where they develop the knowledge, skills, and dispositions needed to be changemakers both within and beyond school.
Jung emphasizes the core principle of UDL: to effectively educate all, educators must focus on the individual needs of each student. She highlights how UDL facilitates success by promoting engagement, providing accessible instruction, and offering diverse methods for students to show their learning. Jung champions the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique learning journey each student takes.
Boaler, J. (2022). Limitless mind: Learn, lead, and live without barriers. HarperOne, an imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers. Boaler advocates for a growth mindset and challenges the notion of fixed intelligence, supporting ASIJ’s efforts to cultivate an environment where students view challenges as opportunities for growth and discovery.
Carl, K. (2024). How learning happens seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. ROUTLEDGE. The authors translate pivotal educational psychology research into actionable strategies, offering ASIJ valuable insights into evidence-based teaching and learning enhancements.
Cohen, G.L. (2023). Belonging: The science of creating connection and bridging divides. W.W. Norton & Company. Cohen’s research offers evidence-based strategies for fostering inclusive educational environments, supporting ASIJ’s goal of ensuring all students feel valued and connected.
Doyle, T., & Zakrajsek, T. (2019). The new science of learning: How to learn in harmony with your brain. Stylus. This book presents research on optimizing learning processes through an understanding of brain science, advocating for educational strategies that align with natural learning rhythms, beneficial for ASIJ’s focus on student-centered, research-informed teaching practices.
Flemming, S. (2021). Know thyself: The science of self-awareness. Basic Books. Fleming shows how metacognition is the most powerful tool we have to understand our own mind and also helps us better understand those around us.
Hall, T.E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal Design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. London. This book offers practical applications of UDL principles in the classroom, focusing on effectively implementing UDL strategies across various subjects and grade levels.
Hari, J. (2023a). Stolen focus: Why you can’t pay attention. Bloomsbury Publishing. Hari’s investigation into the crisis of attention in modern society sheds light on the need for educational environments that foster deep focus and engagement.
Meyer, A., Rose, D.H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing, an imprint of Cast, Inc. Meyer, Rose, and Gordon provide a comprehensive overview of UDL principles backed by research and practice from the field.
Novak, K., & Couros, G. (2022). UDL NOW!: A teacher’s guide to applying Universal Design for Learning. CAST Professional Publishing. Novak’s guide addresses the critical aspects of UDL within modern educational systems, including equity and multi-tiered support. It’s a practical resource for ASIJ educators looking to deepen student engagement through inclusive, differentiated instructional strategies.
Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Palgrave Macmillan. Oliver, a key proponent of the social model of disability, argues against the medical model’s pathologization of disability, advocating for societal changes to accommodate diverse learning needs.
Paul, A.M. (2022). The extended mind: The power of thinking outside the brain. Mariner Books. Paul’s work illuminates the concept of “the extended mind,” advocating for the utilization of tools, environments, and collaboration to enhance cognitive processes.
Ralabate, P. (2016). Your UDL lesson planner: The step-by-step guide for teaching all learners. Brookes Publishing. Ralabate presents a hands-on approach to lesson planning with UDL, providing educators with concrete steps to design lessons that meet the needs of all learners.
Rose, T. (2023). Collective illusions conformity, complicity, and the science of why we make bad decisions. Hachette Go. Rose explores how our brains work and lead us to misunderstand those around us, how this can lead to poor decisionmaking, and how our wiring and social norms are a barrier to individuals meeting their unique potential.
Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. Routledge. Slee critiques the exclusionary practices in education that arise from adherence to a medical model of disability, promoting instead an inclusive educational framework that recognizes all students’ right to belong.
Sousa, D.A., & Tomlinson, C.A. (2018). Differentiation and the brain: How neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom. Solution Tree. This book explores the intersection of neuroscience and differentiated instruction, supporting ASIJ’s dedication to meeting the diverse needs of learners through tailored educational approaches.
Willingham, D.T. (2021). Why don’t students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Jossey-Bass. Willingham combines cognitive science with practical classroom strategies to enhance learning, suggesting that understanding how students think and learn can transform educational practices.
EdSurge. Young, J. (Host). (2011-Present) The edsurge podcast - edsurge guides. Self-published.
Ted. (2014-Present). TED talks education on Apple Podcasts. Apple Podcasts.
Young explores the future of education with discussions on innovative teaching methods, classroom technologies, and groundbreaking research. He offers insights on future trends, including episodes related to cognitive science and supporting diverse learners.
This podcast series navigates the future of education, including the intricacies of knowledge acquisition. Experts share transformative insights on where education is headed, illuminating the evolving methodologies and cognitive processes critical for learning and meeting the diverse needs of students.
Gonzalez, J. (Host). (2014-Present). The Cult of Pedagogy. Self-published.
Nelson, L. L. (Host).(2019-Present). UDL in 15 minutes. Self-published.
Gonzalez studies a variety of educational topics in her podcast, including how to create inclusive learning environments. Her insights align with ASIJ’s dedication to a holistic, human-centered approach to education, offering practical guidance for fostering dynamic classrooms that meet diverse student needs.
Nelson explores UDL principles and offers insights into the UDL framework. Her purpose is to make education accessible and engaging for all learners. Nelson’s experience provides actionable guidance for educators seeking to transform classrooms through greater inclusivity and adaptability.
Grandin, T. (2010, Feb.). The world needs all kinds of minds. TED Conferences.
Moore, S. (2020, February 20). Bringing support to the students just let them eat cake! YouTube.
Grandin emphasizes the value of neurodiverse minds in society, describing her unique “think in pictures” cognitive process. Her insights align with ASIJ’s commitment to embracing diverse learning styles, underscoring our mission to support all students. Grandin’s advocacy for cognitive diversity resonates with ASIJ’s ambition to foster inclusive learning environments that accommodate children’s varied abilities.
Moore advocates for schools to move beyond the traditional medical model of disability. This shift toward embracing a broader understanding of student needs underscores ASIJ’s commitment to fostering an educational environment where every student’s abilities are recognized and nurtured. Moore’s insights offer a perspective on the importance of adapting educational practices to ensure inclusivity and support for every learner.
YouTube. (2024, February 10). A strengthbased approach to learner variability and neurodiversity. YouTube.
YouTube. (2024b, February 15). A crash course in UDL (inclusive learning) with Katie Novak. YouTube.
Pape studies concepts such as learner variability, whole child, and UDL. Her presentation aligns with ASIJ’s vision for student support by promoting a strength-based perspective towards neurodiversity and individual learning strengths. Pape’s insights into embracing the full spectrum of student capabilities underscore ASIJ’s dedication to an inclusive and adaptable learning environment.
Novak provides an overview of UDL principles, showcasing how they can revolutionize teaching strategies to ensure inclusivity and engagement for all students. Novak’s expertise in UDL offers practical insights into creating a flexible and supportive learning environment, which aligns well with ASIJ’s commitment to meet the diverse needs of every learner.
6. Why are schools like ASIJ drawn to a humancentered model of education?
What books have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
Rose challenges the notion of designing systems based on average metrics, advocating for an approach that recognizes individual diversity in talents and learning. Through compelling examples like the Air Force cockpit design, Rose illustrates how systems tailored to the “average” often fit no one, making a strong case for personalization. This concept extends beyond physical dimensions to cognitive abilities, emphasizing recognizing the “jagged” nature of talent and learning. Rose’s critique aligns with ASIJ’s focus on Measuring Success by nurturing individual strengths.
Robinson’s passionate argument for education that celebrates creativity and individuality over standardization directly supports ASIJ’s holistic approach to learning. Through engaging narratives and practical insights, this book encourages educational environments that recognize and cultivate each student’s unique strengths and passions. Robinson’s vision for transforming schools into vibrant, learner-centered communities aligns with ASIJ’s dedication to preparing students academically and as innovative and empathetic thinkers ready to face the world’s challenges.
Hammond bridges neuroscience with culturally responsive pedagogy to outline an educational approach that is as inclusive as it is effective. Her book provides ASIJ with a research-based framework for understanding how culturally and linguistically diverse students learn, advocating for teaching practices responsive to students’ backgrounds and experiences. This methodology enhances student engagement and achievement and fosters a learning environment where every student feels valued and understood, reinforcing ASIJ’s drive towards greater equity, inclusion, and personalization.
What other publications do we recommend?
Bandura, A. (2012). Self-efficacy the exercise of control. Freeman. Bandura explores the concept of self-efficacy and its profound impact on individuals’ ability to achieve goals and overcome challenges. This work reinforces ASIJ’s focus on fostering student confidence and resilience, highlighting the importance of believing in one’s capabilities as a cornerstone of educational success.
Cain, S. (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. Random House. Cain’s exploration of the strengths of introverts provides a crucial perspective that enriches ASIJ’s SDF by highlighting the need for diverse learning environments that accommodate all students, including those who are more reflective and less outspoken.
Duckworth, A. (2018). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Collins. Duckworth’s insights into the role of grit and perseverance in success complement ASIJ’s focus on developing resilient and motivated learners, echoing the value of persistence and passion in educational outcomes.
Eisner, E.W. (2011). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale Univ. Press. Eisner advocates for the integral role of the arts in education, arguing that artistic experiences foster critical thinking, empathy, and creativity. His work supports the human-centered educational model at ASIJ by illustrating how the arts contribute to the whole child’s development, nurturing intellectual, emotional, and aesthetic growth.
Grant, A. (2023). Hidden potential: The science of achieving greater things. Viking. Grant advocates for a shift towards more personalized, strengths-based approaches to education, highlighting the importance of recognizing and nurturing a student’s unique potential, especially those who are overlooked or marginalized.
Grant, A. (2016). Originals: How nonconformists move the world. Penguin Random House LLC. Grant’s exploration of how individuals champion new ideas and drive creativity aligns with ASIJ’s encouragement of innovative thinking and the courage to challenge conventional wisdom.
Kendi, I.X. (2023). How to be an antiracist. Vintage. Kendi’s exploration of antiracism practices offers ASIJ valuable perspectives on fostering an inclusive school culture that actively works against racial biases and promotes equity and justice within the community.
Mattingly, V., Grice, S., & Goldstein, A. (2022). Inclusalytics: How diversity, equity, and inclusion leaders use data to drive their work. Mattingly Solutions. This book’s focus on using data to inform DEI efforts complements ASIJ’s strategies for creating a more inclusive environment, emphasizing accountability and continuous improvement.
Pink, D.H. (2018). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Canongate Books. Pink’s insights into motivation and the changing nature of work inform ASIJ’s efforts to cultivate intrinsic motivation and adaptability among students for future careers.
Project Zero. Harvard University. Retrieved April 3, 2024, from https:// pz.harvard.edu/. Project Zero’s research supports ASIJ’s educational strategies by providing insights into learning processes and effective classroom practices, enriching the school’s approach to fostering deep and meaningful learning.
Ritchhart, R. (2021). Creating cultures of thinking: The 8 forces we must master to truly transform our schools. Langara College. Ritchhart’s framework for cultivating a culture of thinking aligns with ASIJ’s efforts to create a learning environment where critical thinking and inquiry are central, supporting the school’s human-centered educational model.
Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2010). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. Penguin Books. This book explores how personal passion and creativity are crucial to learning and success. Robinson’s insights align with the push for educational systems to cultivate creativity and individual strengths, catering to modern learners’ diverse interests and evolving needs.
Talusan, L. (2023). The identity-conscious educator: Building habits and skills for a more inclusive school. Hawker Brownlow Education. Talusan equips educators with strategies to become more aware of their identities and the identities of their students, supporting ASIJ’s commitment to inclusivity within its educational practices.
Tanu, D. (2020). Growing up in transit: The politics of belonging at an international school. Berghahn Books. Tanu’s exploration of third-culture kids’ experiences in international schools provides ASIJ with insights into fostering a sense of belonging and identity among its diverse student body.
Vedantam, S. (Host). (2015-present).
Hidden Brain. NPR
Listen
Brown, B. (Host). (2020-present). Unlocking Us. VoxMedia
Listen
Anderson, J. (host). (2015-Present).
Harvard EdCast. Harvard Graduate School of Education
This podcast series explores unconscious patterns that dictate human behavior, shedding light on psychological, cognitive, and social processes. Episodes often examine the complexities of learning and decision-making in our modern world.
This podcast series explores the human experience, highlighting the crucial role of empathy, belonging, and vulnerability in education, underscoring the importance of fostering inclusive and human-centered learning environments.
This podcast series explores educational discourse, offering listeners insights into cutting-edge research, transformative education reform, and innovative best practices that support attention to human-centered environments.
Spencer, J. (Host). (2016-Present). The Creative Classroom. John Spencer
This podcast series explores methods for nurturing creativity and innovation in human-centered settings, focusing on project-based learning, design thinking, and student choice — approaches fundamental to human-centered learning environments.
Hansen, U. J. (2022, Sep). ASIJ 2030 | The
Dr Hansen joins ASIJ 2030 in a conversation moderated by Clive Watkins to discuss the transformative potential of adopting a human-centered educational approach. Drawing on her extensive research into pioneering schools, Dr Hansen’s presentation advocates for a reimagined education system that prioritizes the development of each child’s unique human potential, aiming to foster a more equitable, just, and humane society. This recording is available only to families currently enrolled at ASIJ.
Borba joins ASIJ 2030 in a conversation moderated by Marc Vermeire to discuss her book Thrivers and the seven character traits essential for success. Highlighting not grades or test scores, but confidence, empathy, self-control, integrity, curiosity, perseverance, and optimism, Borba offers strategies for developing these traits from preschool through high school. This conversation aligns with ASIJ’s commitment to holistic education. This recording is available only to families currently enrolled at ASIJ.
Adichie, C. N. (2009, July).
The danger of a single story. TEDGlobal 2009. TED Conferences.
Adichie explores the power and peril of reducing individuals or cultures to a single narrative. She illustrates how such simplification can foster stereotypes and prevent genuine understanding across diverse groups. She urges listeners to seek out and appreciate the complex, multifaceted stories of people and places around them. This talk illuminates the profound importance of nurturing diverse, inclusive learning environments where learners exercise empathy and engage with others openly.
Grant, A. (2016, February).
The
Grant explores the characteristics that distinguish original thinkers, highlighting the importance of embracing failure and questioning the status quo. Grant’s talk underscores the value of fostering a school culture that encourages innovation, critical questioning, and the freedom to fail, aligning with ASIJ’s emphasis on developing forward-thinking and adaptable learners. Grant’s perspective on originality provides an important foundation for ASIJ’s efforts to challenge our perceptions of success.
7. What research and literature informs ASIJ’s decision to adopt Deep Learning?
What books have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
Mehta and Fine explore the intricacies of fostering learning environments conducive to deep learning. They argue that such learning is characterized by high levels of engagement, creativity, and community awareness. This perspective is deeply aligned with ASIJ’s educational approach, which emphasizes the creation of spaces where students are empowered to pursue their interests, apply their learning, engage in work that holds real-world significance, and develop a strong sense of personal agency.
Freire critiques a traditional “banking” model of education and emphasizes the power of education to transform societies. His advocacy for a participatory approach embraces collaborative inquiry and reflective practice. This approach seeks to reduce barriers between teachers and students, fostering an educational environment where learning catalyzes personal growth and social justice. Freire’s work is an important inspiration to Michael Fullan’s conception of Deep Learning.
Hattie and Yates delve into the mechanics of learning, offering a thorough analysis that aligns closely with ASIJ’s Definition of Learning and our Portrait of a Learner. They highlight the significance of metacognitive strategies in deepening and extending learning. Their work underscores the importance of evidence-based teaching practices and the need for teachers to adapt methods to more intentionally personalize each student’s unique learning journey.
What other publications do we recommend?
Berger, R., Rugen, L., & Woodfin, L. (2014). Leaders of their own learning: Transforming schools through student-engaged assessment. Jossey-Bass Publishers. This book presents student-engaged assessment as a strategy for fostering independence and critical thinking, aligning with ASIJ’s focus on empowering students to take ownership of their learning in the Deep Learning context.
Kaye, C.B. (2010). The complete guide to service learning: Proven, practical ways to engage students in civic responsibility, academic curriculum, & social action. Free Spirit Pub. Berger Kaye outlines practical strategies for integrating service learning into education, supporting ASIJ’s mission to provide meaningful learning experiences that extend beyond the classroom and foster global citizenship.
Brown, T. (2019). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperCollins. Brown explores design thinking as a method for solving complex problems and fostering innovation and provides a framework that aligns with ASIJ’s SDF, particularly in its emphasis on creative problem-solving and adaptability.
Burns, N. (2023). Inspiring deep learning with metacognition: A guide for secondary teaching. SAGE Publications. Burns advocates for embedding metacognitive strategies in teaching, a practice that fosters self-awareness and deeper learning among students.
Dewey, J. (2024). Experience and education. Nation Press. Dewey’s seminal work emphasizes experiential learning and critiques traditional education models, advocating for education that prepares students for democratic participation. This aligns with ASIJ’s focus on real-world learning experiences that foster critical thinking and personal growth.
Drummy, M., & Fullan, M. (2020). Dive into deep learning: Tools for engagement. Corwin. This comprehensive guide offers actionable strategies for creating deeply engaging, inquiry-based learning environments, perfectly aligning with ASIJ’s commitment to nurturing a culture of meaningful education.
Grant, A. (2023b). Think again: The power of knowing what you don’t know.
W.H. Allen. Grant’s emphasis on rethinking and being open to changing one’s mind resonates with ASIJ’s focus on critical thinking and adaptability.
Hattie, J., Masters, D., & Birch, K. (2016). Visible learning into action: International case studies of impact. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business. The authors provide evidence-based educational practices and a collection of case studies that align to ASIJ’s efforts to implement Deep Learning.
Lemov, D., Lewis, H., Williams, D., & Frazier, D. (2023). Reconnect: Building school culture for meaning, purpose, and belonging. Jossey-Bass. Lemov et al. discuss the significance of cultivating a school culture anchored in meaning, purpose, and belonging, principles that are essential to ASIJ’s mission.
Marschall, C., & Crawford, E. O. (2022). Worldwise learning: A teacher’s guide to shaping a just, sustainable future. Corwin. Aligning with ASIJ’s global citizenship goals, this guide provides educators with strategies to integrate sustainability and social justice themes into the curriculum, fostering a more equitable and sustainable future.
Pink, D.H. (2012). A whole new mind why right-brainers will rule the future. Riverhead Books. Pink’s exploration of the increasing value of right-brain qualities such as creativity, empathy, and big-picture thinking in the new global economy dovetails with ASIJ’s emphasis on fostering diverse cognitive skills in students.
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., Morrison, K., & Perkins, D. (2011). Making thinking visible how to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. Jossey-Bass. This book’s focus on visible thinking routines aligns with ASIJ’s commitment to Deep Learning by encouraging students to actively engage with their thought processes, enhancing understanding and critical thinking skills.
Perkins, D.N. (2014). Future wise: Educating our children for a changing world. Jossey-Bass, a Wiley brand. Perkins advocates for education that prepares students for the complexities of the future, stressing the importance of “lifeworthy” learning— knowledge and skills relevant to the lives students will lead.
Stern, J.H., Ferraro, K.F., Duncan, K., & Aleo, T. (2021). Learning that transfers: Designing curriculum for a changing world. Corwin. Stern et al. highlight the necessity of designing curriculum that fosters transferable skills and knowledge, preparing students for a rapidly evolving world. This principle is central to ASIJ’s curriculum development, which aims to equip students with adaptable and enduring competencies for lifelong success.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. This book outlines Vygotsky’s theories on the social roots of individual cognition and the crucial role of cultural and interpersonal interaction in learning.
Wheatley, M.J. (2023). Who do we choose to be?: Facing reality, claiming leadership, restoring sanity. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Wheatley challenges leaders to confront the complexities of the current era with integrity and compassion, advocating for a leadership model that prioritizes humanity and ethical engagement.
Wormeli, R. (2018). Fair isn’t always equal: Assessment and grading in the differentiated classroom. Hawker Brownlow. Advocating for equitable assessment strategies, Wormeli informs ASIJ’s efforts to tailor assessments to reflect deep learning, ensuring all students are assessed in meaningful, supportive ways.
Zhao, Y. (2018). Reach for greatness: Personalizable education for all children. Corwin, a SAGE Publishing Company. Zhao advocates for personalized education systems that recognize and develop individual student strengths, challenging the one-size-fits-all approach.
Sung, K., & Gobir, N. (Hosts). (2016-present). MindShift. KQED
This podcast series delves into the forefront of educational innovation, emphasizing Deep Learning, project-based learning, and effective strategies for equipping students with essential skills for thriving in the 21st century.
Vander Ark, T., & Getting Smart Team (Hosts). (2011-present). Getting Smart. Getting Smart
Campus Compact. (Host). (2016-present). The Compact Nation Podcast. Campus Compact
This podcast series investigates transformative educational trends and innovative teaching methods, providing insight into how schools might reshape learning environments and rethink pedagogy in ways that resonate with Deep Learning.
Utecht, J. & Friedman, T. (Hosts). (2006-present). Shifting Our Schools. Shifting Schools
This podcast series explores service learning and community engagement in education, aligning with ASIJ’s dedication to cultivating globally-minded, accountable students keen to explore learning partnerships and to apply learning in the real world.
This podcast series provides teachers with the tools, ideas, and inspiration for shifting from a traditional pedagogical model to a more learning-progressive model that emphasizes the application of 21st-century skills and Deep Learning.
Cahen-Salvador, C. (2020, May). A global movement to solve global problems. TED Conferences.
Dziko, T.M. (2021, Nov). How schools can nurture every student’s genius. TEDxSeattle.
Cahen-Salvador outlines an inspiring vision for tackling the world’s most daunting challenges through global collaboration and grassroots activism. She emphasizes the power of collective action and shared responsibility in creating sustainable solutions, highlighting the urgent need for a unified approach that will address issues related to climate change and human rights.
Dziko explores innovative strategies for schools to identify and foster the unique talents of every student, emphasizing the importance of creating an engaging and supportive educational environment. It aligns with ASIJ’s dedication to personalize learning and our belief that all students possess unique potential that, when nurtured, can lead to remarkable learning and the discovery of one’s passions.
Zhang, L. (2017, Dec). Why schools should teach entrepreneurship. TED@Westpac.
Shahidi, Y. (2023, April). Let curiosity lead. TED2023.
Zhang argues that entrepreneurship should be more intentionally taught in schools. She contends that doing so allows students to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and resilience skills. ASIJ’s N-12 Portrait of a Learner, and specifically our Mindset and Creativity progressions, highlight the critical importance of innovation and adaptability to our students.
Shahidi explores the transformative power of curiosity and empathy. Her discussion resonates deeply with ASIJ’s attention to cultivating student agency. She advocates for an education that encourages learners to remain endlessly inquisitive and compassionate. Shahidi’s message emphasizes the critical role of curiosity in driving meaningful change across diverse communities.
What books have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
Selingo’s insights into the college admissions process offer ASIJ students a clear understanding of what admissions officers are looking for and the complex interplay between institutional needs and student diversity. His exploration encourages ASIJ to continue fostering an environment where students are empowered to present their true selves in college applications, emphasizing the value of authenticity over strategic maneuvering in the admissions process.
A refreshing take on the college admissions frenzy, Bruni challenges the notion that prestigious institutions are the only path to success. His book aligns with ASIJ’s emphasis on helping students find the right-fit college that genuinely meets the student’s needs and aspirations. Bruni’s insights are valuable to students and their families, encouraging them to approach the college admissions process with confidence and open minds, focusing on personal growth and long-term fulfillment.
Sabky offers a compassionate guide for students navigating the stressful terrain of college admissions. Drawing from her experience as a Dartmouth College admissions director, Sabky provides actionable advice for standing out in the application process while maintaining well-being. Her insights align with ASIJ’s approach to supporting students through their college admissions journeys, emphasizing authenticity and mental health alongside academic excellence.
Abrams, A. (2023). Shortchanged: How advanced placement cheats students. Johns Hopkins University Press. Abrams critically evaluates the Advanced Placement program, asserting that its focus on testing detracts from its original educational goals.
Antonoff, S.R. (2022). College match: A blueprint for choosing the best school for you. EDUconsultingMedia. Antonoff’s guide emphasizes a personalized approach to college selection, aligning with ASIJ’s dedication to supporting students in making informed choices that reflect their unique aspirations.
Archibald, R.B., & Feldman, D.H. (2017). The road ahead for America’s colleges and universities. Oxford University Press. Archibald and Feldman examine the future of higher education in America, addressing challenges such as demographic shifts, technological advancements, and institutions’ financial sustainability.
Barnard, B., & Clark, R. (2023). The truth about college admission: A family guide to getting in and staying together. Johns Hopkins University Press. Clark and Barnard’s demystification of the college admissions process aligns with ASIJ’s efforts to prepare families for navigating post-secondary pathways with clarity and confidence.
Deresiewicz, W. (2015). Excellent Sheep: The miseducation of the American elite and the way to a meaningful life. Free Press. Deresiewicz critiques the education system, emphasizing our need to rethink our priorities to ensure we are valuing critical thinking and creativity over conformity. This book inspires ASIJ’s drive toward agency, personalization, and inquiry, as opposed to offering learning that is compliance-oriented
Fischman, W., & Gardner, H. (2022). The real world of college: What higher education is and what it can be. The MIT Press. Fischman and Gardner’s exploration of innovative educational institutions offers insights that resonate with ASIJ’s mission to equip students for success in life beyond college.
Furda, E., & Steinberg, J. (2021). The college conversation: A practical companion for parents to guide their children along the path to higher education. Penguin Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House. This guide’s emphasis on meaningful conversations around college planning supports ASIJ’s holistic approach to student development and college preparedness.
Horn, M.B., & Moesta, B. (2019). Choosing college: How to make better learning decisions throughout your life. Jossey-Bass. Horn and Moesta’s framework for making informed college decisions underscores the importance of self-discovery and alignment with personal goals, mirroring ASIJ’s student-centered advising philosophy.
Lieber, R. (2021). The price you pay for college. Harper. Lieber’s guide to navigating the economic complexities of college planning provides ASIJ families with critical insights into making informed educational investments.
Princeton Review. (2024). Paying for College, 2024 Edition: Everything You Need to Maximize Financial Aid and Afford College. This resource is invaluable for ASIJ families navigating the financial aspects of college planning, providing up-to-date information on financial aid and affordability.
Tanabe, G., & Tanabe, K. (2023). The ultimate scholarship book 2024: Billions of dollars in scholarships, grants and prizes. SuperCollege. The Tanabes’ comprehensive guide to scholarships is a vital tool for ASIJ students, aligning with the school’s efforts to support students in securing financial aid and scholarships and making higher education more accessible.
Coffin, L. (Host). (2021-present). The Admissions Beat. Dartmouth College.
Selingo, J., & Horn, M. (Hosts). (2018-present). Future U. Future U Podcast.
This podcast, hosted by Dartmouth’s VP and Dean of Admissions, offers in-depth insights into the Ivy League admissions process, providing valuable guidance from experts and a behind-thescenes look at selective admissions.
Lederman, D. (Host). (2020-present). The Key with Inside Higher Ed. Inside Higher Ed.
This podcast series examines the landscape of higher education, focusing on innovation and the future of college admissions, providing insights for schools like ASIJ monitoring trends and preparing students for their educational futures.
This podcast series navigates the intricacies of higher education, including the college admissions and the changing landscape of higher education. Episodes offer valuable insights supporting students with college admissions.
Abraham, L. (Host). (2012-present). Admission Straight Talk. Accepted
This podcast series provides interviews with admissions officers, successful applicants, and admissions experts, offering a comprehensive look at college admissions, from application strategies to understanding what admissions officials seek.
Nov).
Jan).
In this ASIJ 2030 event, moderated by Clive Watkins, Jeff Selingo shares his valuable strategies for students to become futureready, focusing on the skills, experiences, and attributes that will benefit them in the college admissions process. Drawing from his extensive research, Selingo offers actionable insights for ASIJ students navigating the college admissions process. This recording is available only to families currently enrolled at ASIJ.
Moderated by Christy Carrillo, this ASIJ 2030 event features Jeff Selingo’s post-pandemic return to the series. Selingo delves into the complexities of college admissions, outlining the critical shifts in the admissions landscape, providing essential insights for students and parents. Selingo is invited to share his views on SCOTUS decisions and other changes to the college admissions landscape. This recording is also available only to families currently enrolled at ASIJ.
C. M. (2022, April). What makes a “good college” — and why it matters. TEDxMileHigh.
Orphan challenges the notion of “good colleges” being those that are highly selective and expensive. She advocates for a shift in perspective towards valuing regional public universities that offer accessible education to a broader student base. Orphan’s discussion urges a reevaluation of what constitutes prestige in higher education, emphasizing the need for institutions to create opportunities rather than restrict them, calling for a more inclusive approach to evaluating colleges.
Coleman delivers a passionate call for a radical rethinking of liberal arts education, advocating for a curriculum that combines breadth of knowledge with practical, real-world applications. While Coleman’s interests are primarily with higher education, we think her message about breadth vs. specialization is important for ASIJ students to consider as they evaluate what they’re looking for, what they need to know about colleges, and what will bring them happiness.
9. What research on change leadership has informed ASIJ’s approach to strategic planning?
What books have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
An updated edition of their seminal work on adaptive leadership, Heifetz, Linsky, and Grashow provide a compendium of strategies for leadership in the face of complex, evolving challenges. This edition enriches the adaptive leadership framework presented in the authors’ earlier work with case studies and actionable advice. The principles and tools associated with adaptive leadership provide ASIJ a valuable toolkit for navigating complex organizational change.
Fullan discusses the importance of adaptability and culturebased accountability in leadership, advocating for a flexible, opportunity-based approach to strategic planning. Fullan’s advocacy for a leadership style that is responsive to opportunities rather than constrained by rigid plans reinforces ASIJ’s strategies for embracing educational innovations and preparing students to excel in an unpredictable environment.
As she was retiring as NAIS president in 2023, Donna Orem wrote this powerful series on adaptive leadership. Describing our modern context as a polycrisis, Orem distinguishes between technical challenges, which are solvable with existing knowledge and processes, and adaptive ones that require deep cultural renewal. She elaborates on the behaviors that define adaptive leaders—highlighting their role fostering cultures that thrive amidst change.
Orem, D. (2023). Adaptive Leadership Series. National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS). https://www.nais.org/learn/independent-ideas/ april-2023/adaptive-leadership-part-1-technical-oradaptive-challenge/ What other books do we recommend?
Brown, B. (2023). Dare to lead: Brave work, tough conversations, whole hearts. Bookshare. Brown’s work on leadership emphasizes vulnerability, courage, and empathy as strengths. Her principles can inspire ASIJ’s leadership and community to embrace change with openness, fostering an environment where innovation and growth are nurtured.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great. New York, NY: HarperBusiness. Collins explores what differentiates great companies from good ones and how they can sustain longterm success. Insights from this book could inform ASIJ’s approach to achieving excellence through continuous improvement and strategic leadership.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Routledge. Hargreaves and Fullan’s “professional capital” concept emphasizes the importance of investing in teacher expertise, collaboration, and decision-making, aligning with ASIJ’s focus on professional development and collaborative teaching practices for educational innovation.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass. Fullan discusses the challenges of leading in times of change, offering strategies for fostering a culture that embraces innovation and learning. His perspectives on change management could complement ASIJ’s efforts to cultivate a forward-thinking educational environment.
Fullan, M. (2016). The six secrets of change: What the best leaders do to help their organizations survive and thrive. Jossey-Bass. Fullan’s insights into the dynamics of organizational change offer valuable strategies for sustaining improvement and innovation in schools. His focus on purpose, respect, and intelligence in change processes reflects ASIJ’s commitment to research-informed strategic planning that engages the whole school community.
Kegan, R., & Lahey, L.L. (2016). An everyone culture: Becoming a deliberately developmental organization. Harvard Business Review Press. Kegan and Lahey present a model for organizational culture that emphasizes personal development as a continuous process intertwined with the organization’s success. This concept could offer ASIJ valuable strategies for fostering a culture where ongoing learning and adaptation are part of the school’s DNA.
Kerr, J. (2013, 2020). Legacy: 15 lessons in leadership. London, UK: Constable & Robinson Ltd. Kerr’s lessons from the New Zealand All Blacks highlight the significance of team culture and leadership in achieving excellence. ASIJ draws on these principles to enhance its governance model, focusing on teamwork, respect, and learning from failure, reflecting the school’s continuous improvement and excellence ethos.
Kotter, J.P. (2012). Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Kotter’s Eight-Stage Process for Creating Major Change offers a roadmap for transformative leadership that ASIJ incorporates into its strategic planning processes. This methodology emphasizes empowering employees and navigating inertia, critical components of ASIJ’s approach to fostering an innovative and adaptive educational environment.
Tushman, M.L. (2016). Lead and disrupt: How to solve the innovator’s dilemma. Stanford Business Books. This book addresses how organizations can lead in their current markets and disrupt new ones by mastering ambidexterity—balancing exploitation and exploration. Its principles can guide ASIJ in balancing traditional educational excellence with the need to innovate and adapt to future learning paradigms.
Safir, S. & Dugan, J. (2021). Street data: A next-generation model for equity, pedagogy, and school transformation. SAGE Publishing. This book’s critique of overreliance on standardized test scores and advocacy for a humanizing approach to data informs ASIJ’s educational strategies, promoting equity and learning that values each student’s unique potential and contributions.
Sinek, S. (2019). The infinite game. Portfolio. Sinek’s concept of playing the “infinite game” in business and life provides a helpful metaphor for ASIJ’s educational philosophy, emphasizing long-term thinking, adaptability, and the continuous pursuit of improvement and growth in learning.
Sinek, S. (2011). Start with why. Portfolio. Sinek’s concept of starting with “why” underscores the importance of purpose in leadership, which influences ASIJ’s commitment – Know, Value, Care – embodies ASIJ’s core purpose, differentiating the school and guiding its strategic decisions, reflecting a straightforward, purposedriven approach to education.
This podcast series delves into courageous leadership, blending Brown’s research with practical advice to inspire leaders to lead with vulnerability and resilience. Episodes often focus on how to foster an environment of openness, empathy, and innovation in their organization or school.
This podcast series explores the science of work and leadership in contemporary times. Through interviews with a variety of leaders who have unconventional approaches, Grant uncovers insights into creativity, leadership, and motivation. Conversations often resonate with Grant’s book Think Again
This podcast series brings together experts in leadership, offering insights into change leadership, strategic planning, and the skills necessary to lead complex organizations through change in a rapidly evolving era. This podcast series often shares research from the HBR articles on leadership.
This podcast offers a deep dive into the minds of top leaders, sharing their strategies and stories of navigating complex challenges and spearheading change, making it a valuable resource for those interested in understanding the nuances of leadership and innovation
Brown, B. (2010, June). The power of vulnerability. TEDxHouston.
Heffernan, M. (2012, Aug). Dare to disagree. YouTube.
Fullan, M. (2022). Michael Fullan: Leading Through Change in 2022. YouTube.
Brown explores the importance of vulnerability, empathy, and connection, asserting that embracing our vulnerabilities is crucial to forming meaningful relationships. This discussion underpins ASIJ’s commitment to creating an inclusive, supportive educational environment where every student feels valued and connected.
Heffernan argues that many leaders avoid conflict and seek false harmony. She claims constructive disagreement often drives progress. Hefferman reveals how a willingness to embrace diverse perspectives and allow room for dissent can lead to breakthroughs on teams and foster a culture of open dialogue, creativity, and critical thinking.
Fullan shares his expertise on leading through change and discusses the strategies for achieving meaningful change in schools, focusing on the moral purpose of ensuring all children learn. Fullan’s approach to school leadership emphasizes the importance of embracing Deep Learning initiatives that are essential to meeting modern learners’ evolving needs.
Heifetz, R. (2021, Dec). Adaptive Leadership. YouTube.
Heifetz, the Director of the Center for Leadership at Harvard University, explains the principles behind adaptive leadership. Heifetz distinguishes between technical and adaptive challenges, formal and informal authority, and strategies for embracing change. His insights are invaluable for schools navigating complex change processes.
What publications have had the greatest influence on our thinking about this question?
This handbook is essential for international schools like ASIJ, offering guidance on navigating global governance best practice. Chojnacki and Detwiler emphasize aligning governance with strategic goals to effectively support the school’s mission and vision. It highlights the board’s role in maintaining governance excellence, which is crucial for ASIJ’s commitment to educational leadership and accountability. It provides the Board of Directors - Head authority matrix that clarifies roles and responsibilities. The handbook aids ASIJ in integrating global governance perspectives, enhancing its ability to implement its SDF effectively.
BoardSource (2005). The source: Twelve principles of governance that power exceptional boards. https:// boardsource.org/product/source-twelve-principlesgovernance-power-exceptional-boards/.
This publication sheds light on school governance. Through its exploration of NAIS governance principles, The Source is a blueprint for boards to transcend conventional oversight and actively propel the organization forward. This publication underscores the symbiotic relationship between effective governance and the strategic advancement of the school’s mission and vision. It emphasizes a governance model that balances oversight with dynamic support for the organization’s leadership and aligns seamlessly with ASIJ’s dedication to upholding the highest standards.
Rogen, S., & Owen, T. (2019, June). The adaptive school board: Governance and leading in a new era. Greenwich Leadership Partners. https://www.greenwichleadershippartners.com/ governance-white-paper.
Rogen and Owen address the evolving landscape of school governance amidst rapid societal and technological changes. This white paper argues for a paradigm shift from traditional governance models to adaptive boards that are agile, forwardthinking, and equipped to navigate complex challenges. Emphasizing the importance of continuous learning, strategic thinking, and a culture of inquiry, Rogen and Owen present a compelling vision for boards that are not just stewards of resources but also catalysts for educational innovation and excellence, which is precisely what ASIJ needs.
What other books do we recommend?
Axelrod, N.R. (2020). Board leadership and development. BoardSource. Focuses on developing board leadership and engagement strategies. This work supports ASIJ’s drive for a proactive and learning-oriented board culture, aligning with strategic objectives outlined in its governance framework.
Bryk, A.S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation. Bryk and Schneider explore the critical role of trust in educational improvement, presenting trust-building as essential to effective governance. This research supports ASIJ’s focus on cultivating strong relationships within its community, highlighting how trust between stakeholders can underpin successful governance and school improvement efforts.
Carlson, M., & Donohoe, M. (2010). The executive director’s guide to thriving as a nonprofit leader. Jossey-Bass. The authors highlight collaborative dynamics between nonprofit leaders and boards, providing insights into ASIJ’s strategic collaboration and leadership practices that support the school’s governance and strategic objectives.
Chait, R.P., Ryan, W.P., & Taylor, B.E. (2005). Governance as leadership: Reframing the work of nonprofit boards. John Wiley & Sons. The authors introduce a governance model designed to enhance board engagement, which has been crucial for ASIJ’s aspirations towards strategic innovation and effectiveness. Chait’s vision of governance as leadership has been an underlying priority for ASIJ’s Board of Directors between 2017 and the present as the school has partnered with them to create the SDF.
DeKuyper, H., & Taylor, K. (2023). The committee handbook. National Association of Independent Schools. Explores influential committee roles in governance, guiding ASIJ towards aligning its governance structure with strategic priorities, directly supporting the school’s strategic objectives and design.
Eadie, D. (2009). Extraordinary board leadership: The keys to high impact governing. Jones & Bartlett Learning. Eadie outlines the principles of high-impact board leadership, providing strategies for boards to enhance their effectiveness and influence.
Hotchkiss, D. (2016). Governance and ministry: Rethinking board leadership. An Alban Institute Book, Rowman & Littlefield. Hotchkiss offers strategies for aligning governance with educational missions, assisting ASIJ in refining governance practices to support strategic objectives and enhance academic excellence.
Midanek, D.H. (2018). The governance revolution what every board member needs to know, now! Walter de Gruyter. Midanek offers a comprehensive guide to modern governance challenges and opportunities, emphasizing the need for boards to adapt to changing environments and stakeholders’ expectations.
Orem, D., & Wilson, D.P. (2017). Trustee handbook (10th ed.). National Association of Independent Schools. Acts as a guide on board roles and responsibilities, offering a foundation for strategic and engaged leadership crucial to achieving ASIJ’s mission and strategic plan goals.
Trower, C.A. (2013). The practitioner’s guide to governance as leadership: Building high-performing nonprofit boards. Jossey-Bass. Trower advocates for a shift in nonprofit management from oversight to strategic leadership, a concept vital for ASIJ as it seeks to elevate board performance.
Wallestad, A. (2021). The four principles of purpose-driven board leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.48558/ S4ZJ-Q994. Wallestad outlines four fundamental principles for transformative board leadership to align nonprofit governance with organizational mission and social impact. These principles emphasize purpose, respect for the ecosystem, equity, and empowered decision-making.
© The American School in Japan, 2024