De Lima acquitted of...

consideration.

“The rare exception is when there is no evidence sustaining the judgment of conviction other than the testimony of a witness or witnesses who are shown to have made contradictory statements as to material facts under which circumstances the court may be led to a different conclusion,” the decision read.

Ragos executed an affidavit in April 2022 saying “there is no truth whatsoever” to the allegations against De Lima which he said he was forced to say by former Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II and other government lawyers.

“All of my allegations to the contrary in my affidavits and House and court testimonies are all fiction, false and fabricated,” he said then.

Ragos had testified that he received P5 million on Nov. 24, 2012 and another P5 million on Dec. 15, 2012, from Bilibid inmates involved in illegal drug trading, which he later handed to Dayan.

But in his affidavit, Ragos said: “As far as I know and based on my professional relationship with Sec. De Lima, she is incapable of doing anything illegal, much less engage in the illegal drug trade or accept money from Bilibid inmates.” conclusive evidence,” the court said.

With the court giving weight to Ragos’ recantation, it said that the prosecution failed to establish that De Lima and Dayan were direct participants in illegal drug trading.

Drug trade exists

Despite this, the court said the prosecution was able to prove the existence of rampant illegal drug trading in Bilibid.

“The prosecution successfully proved the complex network of transactions wherein highprofile inmates at the NBP controlled and managed the illegal trafficking of drugs through the use of electronic mobile devices,” it said.

It continued, “Moreover, the prosecution witnesses testified on how these inmates were able to broker drug transactions from within NBP.”

The court noted the Dec. 15, 2014 raid on Bilibid where luxury kubols within its maximum security compound were discovered and illegal drugs, cash, firearms, ammunition and mobile phones used in the drug trade were confiscated.

It also gave weight to the testimony of a financial investigator from the AntiMoney Laundering Council who examined bank accounts that were later traced to high-profile Bilibid inmates where millions of pesos were deposited from across the country.

“Here, the prosecution competently established the existence of illegal drug trading at the NBP. However, the retraction of witness Ragos casts reasonable doubt on the participation of herein accused as conspirators therein,” the court said. 