annulment with Aljur Abrenica ongoing, AJ Raval not ‘kabit’

MANILA — Kapuso actress Kylie Padilla defended exhusband Aljur Abrenica’s current girlfriend AJ Raval. In a recent live video on social media, Kylie said she’s happy with Aljur and AJ’s relationship.

“Tapos na po e. I mean, siyempre ‘di pa tapos ‘yung pagaayos ng papeles but everything else tapos na po talaga siya. So kung meron mang magtanong ngayon, I will answer but that’s the last time I’m going to talk about this kasi happy na po ako,” Kylie said.

“I am really happy po. Basta… kasi kapag mahal n’yo po ‘yung isang tao, ayaw n’yo pong makitang malungkot ‘yung taong ‘yun. And after po nu’ng nangyari sa amin, after ng pandemic, ayoko na po ever maramdaman namin ‘yun and siya rin

“So kung saan po siya masaya at kung sino po ang magpapasaya sa kanila, I want them to take care of it and be happy. Kasi siya po ang kahati ko sa mga anak ko e. So dapat masaya rin ‘yung tatay nila para buo ‘yung mga anak ko. Kasi masaya na rin naman ako and ang ganda po ng mga nangyayari sa akin. So ‘di ba, wala pong halong ka-echosan?” she added.

Kylie clarified that AJ is not the reason of her breakup with Aljur, so she’s not the third party in their relationship. “Hindi po talaga si AJ ‘yung reason. And that’s the truth. Hindi po talaga siya. Kung meron man, hindi po siya. So please... Naawa na rin po ako sa kaniya,” she said.

“As someone with struggles with mental health, ang hirap po na gigising ka sa umaga ta’s puro hate ‘yung makikita mo. Please guys, woman to woman na, hindi ako okay, it makes me emotional too, tigilan na po natin, please.

Kasi it’s not fair to her – naiiyak ako… Hindi po talaga. Tama na, tama na. Hindi po talaga siya. I mean, si AJ Raval, she’s not lying. We’re really okay. Kaya tigilan n’yo po please. Tama na guys, kasi hindi talaga siya. Hindi siya and hindi ko ever sasabihin kung sino kasi ayoko na ng ganyan –nu’ng nag-a-ano tayo ng hate, ano na lang guys – kindness, love. We need more energy na ganu’n,” she added.

IN spite of the radical leftist media, especially social platforms, widely tearing down and mocking everyone who had suggested that the COVID-19 originated from a leak in the Wuhan laboratory, and all covered up by China, epidemiologists and political leaders remained convinced, and now the U.S. Department of Energy and the FBI have concluded that the origin was, in fact, a lab leak caused by human error or accident in the Wuhan lab. Since there is still no evidence of zoonotic carrier (bats, snakes, pangolin, etc.) from December 2019 to the present, it is obvious that a lab leak in Wuhan caused the COVID-19 pandemic. Plain common sense.

As of Tuesday, February 28, 2023, there were 679,912,028 COVID cases, with 6,799,783 deaths worldwide; 105,266,332 cases, with 1,145,415 deaths in the United States; and 4,076,307, with 66,111 deaths in the Philippines.

Had Communist China locked down the entire Wuhan City, after its discovery of the first case of the novel corona virus infection on December 19, 2019, the infection could have been limited to Wuhan and not even spread to the rest of China, much less around the world, saving at least 668 million lives globally.

Why the Biden administration is not willing to accept this strong consensus in the scientific community and among political leaders, and not blaming and holding China responsible for this preventable global catastrophe, is, indeed, very puzzling.

COVID and diabetes

New studies reveal that among the unvaccinated, the incidence of developing a new-onset diabetes mellitus was significantly higher following COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 vaccines appear to offer some protection for those who received the vaccines from developing new-onset diabetes.

“In a cohort of nearly 24,000 adults at a large California health system, adjusted models showed that having a history of a treated COVID infection was tied with a 58% higher likelihood of developing new-onset diabetes compared with a new diagnosis of a benchmark condition,” reported Alan Kwan, MD, MSc, of Cedars-Sinai Health System in Los Angeles and colleagues in JAMA Network. He added, “This risk appeared to be mostly driven by unvaccinated individuals; unvaccinated