6 minute read

References

Severe COVID-19 | 447

provement), optimal setting (hierarchic approach to operative location, enhanced PPE), optimal procedure and management after tracheostomy (McGrath 2020).

Lung Transplantation

As in other terminal lung diseases, lung transplantation (LTX) can be a potential therapeutic option. Of course, the indication needs to be considered especially careful. In an editorial published in August 2020, the authors list ten considerations that they believe should be carefully weighed when assessing a patient with COVID-19-associated ARDS regarding potential candidacy for lung transplantation (< 65 years, only single-organ dysfunction, sufficient time for lung recovery, radiological evidence of irreversible lung disease, such as severe bullous destruction or established fibrosis, etc) (Cypel 2020). Up to now, only case reports have been published. After 52 days of critical COVID-19, ECMO and several complications, a comprehensive interdisciplinary discussion on the direction of treatment resulted in a consensus that the lungs of the otherwise healthy 44-year-old woman from Klagenfurt, Austria had no potential for recovery. On day 58, a suitable donor organ became available, and a sequential bilateral lung transplant was performed. At day 144, the patient remained well. Despite the success of this case, the authors emphasize that lung transplantation is an option for only a small proportion of patients (Lang 2020).

Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Shumaker AH, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 27:ciaa478. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32338708. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa478 | Version 3.3.0, last updated 25.09.2020. Full-text: https://www.idsociety.org/COVID19guidelines Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early Self-Proning in Awake, Non-intubated Patients in the

Emergency Department: A Single ED´s Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 22. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32320506. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13994 Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020 May 19:S0140-6736(20)31189-2. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32442528. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2 Cypel M, Keshavjee S. When to consider lung transplantation for COVID-19. Lancet Resp Med,

August 25, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30393-3 Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with

covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective obser-

vational cohort study. BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1985. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32444460. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1985

448 | CovidReference.com

Elharrar X, Trigui Y, Dols AM, et al. Use of Prone Positioning in Nonintubated Patients With

COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure. JAMA. May 15, 2020. Full-text: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766292 Gattinoni L, Chiumell D, Caironi P, et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for diffrent phenotypes? Intensive Care Med April, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2 Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, et al. Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive

Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med July 15, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539 Griffiths MJD, McAuley DF, Perkins GD, et al. Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. BMJ Open Resp Res 2019;6:e000420. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000420 Gupta S, Hayek SS, Wang W, et al. Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With

Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med July 15, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596 Karagiannidis C, Mostert C, Hentschker C, et al. Case characteristics, resource use, and out-

comes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an obser-

vational study. Lancet Respir Med 2020, published 28 July. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30316-7 Kon ZN, Smith DE, Chang SH, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Severe

COVID-19. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul 17:S0003-4975(20)31152-8. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32687823. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.002 Lang C, Jaksch P, Hoda MA, et al. Lung transplantation for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome in a PCR-positive patient. Lancet Resp Med, August 25, 2020.

Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30361-1 Lyons C, Callaghan M. The use of high-flow nasal oxygen in COVID-19. Anaesthesia. 2020 Apr 4. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32246843. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15073 Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress. JAMA. 2020 Apr 24.

PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32329799. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6825 McGrath BA, Brenner MJ, Warrillow SJ, et al. Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 Era: Global and

Multidisciplinary Guidance. Lancet Respir Med 2020 May 15. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30230-7 Pfeifer M, Ewig S, Voshaar T, et al. Position Paper for the State-of-the-Art Application of Respiratory Support in Patients with COVID-19. Respiration. 2020 Jun 19:1-21. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32564028. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1159/000509104 Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and

Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Ar-

ea. JAMA. 2020 Apr 22. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32320003. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775) Schultz MJ, Teng MS, Brenner MJ. Timing of Tracheostomy for Patients With COVID-19 in the

ICU—Setting Precedent in Unprecedented Times. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

September 3, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2630 Smereka J, Puslecki M, Ruetzler K, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19. Cardiol J. 2020 Apr 14. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32285929. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0053 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critally ill Aduts with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (CoVID-19). 28 March 2020 .https://www.sccm.org/SurvivingSepsisCampaign/Guidelines/COVID-19 (accessed 30 August 2020) Tay JK, Koo ML, Loh WS. Surgical Considerations for Tracheostomy During the COVID-19

PandemicLessons Learned From the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online March 31, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0764

Severe COVID-19 | 449

Telias I, Katira BH, Brochard L, et al. Is the Prone Position Helpful During Spontaneous

Breathing in Patients With COVID-19? JAMA. Published online May 15, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.8539 Thompson AE, Ranard BL, Wei Y. Prone Positioning in Awake, Nonintubated Patients With

COVID-19 Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. JAMA Intern Med June 17, 2020. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3030 Wang Y, Lu X, Chen H, et al. Clinical Course and Outcomes of 344 Intensive Care Patients with

COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 8. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32267160.

Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202003-0736LE Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease

2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases From the

Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Feb 24. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32091533. Fulltext: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648 Ziehr DR, Alladina J, Petri CR, et al. Respiratory Pathophysiology of Mechanically Ventilated

Patients with COVID-19: A Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 15;201(12):1560-1564. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202004-1163LE

450 | CovidReference.com

12. Co-morbidities

Christian Hoffmann Published 20 January 2021

Hundreds of articles have been published over the last twelve months, making well-meaning attempts to determine whether patients with different comorbidities are more susceptible for SARS-CoV-2 infection or at higher risk for severe disease. This deluge of scientific publications has resulted in worldwide uncertainty. For a number of reasons, many studies must be interpreted with extreme caution. First, in many articles, the number of patients with specific co-morbidities is low. Small sample sizes preclude accurate comparison of COVID-19 risk between these patients and the general population. They may also overestimate mortality, especially if the observations were made in-hospital (reporting bias). Moreover, the clinical manifestation and the relevance of a condition may be heterogeneous. Is the hypertension treated or untreated? What is the stage of the COPD, only mild or very severe with low blood oxygen levels? Is the “cancer” cured, untreated or actively being treated? Are we talking about a seminoma cured by surgical orchiectomy years ago or about palliative care for pancreatic cancer? What is a “former” smoker: someone who decided to quit 20 years ago after a few months puffing during adolescence or someone with 40 package-years who stopped the day before his lung transplantation? Does “HIV” mean a well controlled infection while on long-lasting, successful antiretroviral therapy or an untreated case of AIDS? Unfortunately, many researchers tend to combine these cases, in order to get larger numbers and to get their paper published. Second, there are numerous confounding factors to consider. In some case series, only symptomatic patients are described, in others only those who were hospitalized (and who have per se a higher risk for severe disease). In some countries, every patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection will be hospitalized, in others only those with risk factors or with severe COVID-19. Testing policies vary widely between countries. The control group (with or without comorbidities) is not always well-defined. Samples may not be representative, risk factors not correctly taken into account. Sometimes, there is incomplete information about age distribution, ethnicity, co-morbidities, smoking, drug use and gender (there is some evidence that, in female patients, comorbidities have no or less impact on the course of the disease, compared to

Co-morbidities | 451