Issuu on Google+

INTERVENTIONS


Envelope Composition


Envelope Composition Environment


Envelope Composition Environment Condition


Envelope Composition Environment Condition Treatment Approach


Envelope Composition Environment Condition Treatment Approach Design Intent


UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Music Building 1892 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1923-1928 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Carl A. Fields Center 1895


UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Music Building 1892


KEY CHARACTERISTICS Wood Sash Brick, Terra Cotta, Bluestone Slate and Copper Roof Wood Framing


existing brown

more recent pale grays and off-whites

later grays and dark greens

original red-brown

Music Building, North Elevation. Sample MUSI.N.4 removed from a window surround.

original red-brown

Music Building, West Elevation. Sample MUSI.W.11 removed from a porch column. BUILDING CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES INC


UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1923-1928


KEY CHARACTERISTICS Three construction Systems Guastavino Tile Steel Frame Masonry Bearing Walls Monumental Spaces 500 Windows


ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞͬ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌͬůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵ ^ŚĂƌĞĚWƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ &/ĂŶĚĸůŝĂƚĞĚWƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐĂŶĚhŶĚĞƌŐƌĂĚƵĂƚĞWƌŽŐƌĂŵKĸĐĞƐ 'ƌĂĚƵĂƚĞ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ

FICE

EĞǁDĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů ŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚůƵƐƚĞƌƐ

dŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂůůŽĐĂƚĞƐĮǀĞůĞǀĞůƐƚŽĨĂĐƵůƚLJĂŶĚƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ǁŝƚŚĂŶĞǁ ĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵĂŶĚŶĞǁŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůƐƉĂĐĞƐƐĞƚďĞůŽǁƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚƚĞƌƌĂĐĞƐ͘

H A SE II NAR / CLASSROOM CONFERENCE / SEMI SHARED PROGRAMS BFI AND AFFILIATED

PROGRAMS

OFFICE RGRADUATE PROGRAM ECONOMICS AND UNDE AND GRADUATE STUDENTS

RESEARCH

NEW MECHANICAL CIRCULATION LTY RESEARCH AND FACU

dŚĞĂĚĚŝƟŽŶŝƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĞĚĨŽƌƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚĨĂĐƵůƚLJŽĸĐĞƐ͕ŽŶƚŚƌĞĞůĞǀĞůƐ͕ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚƚŽƚǁŽƌŽǁŚŽƵƐĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĞƌ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌLJ͘ AnnBehaArchitects

AnnBehaArchitects

9


PropertiesofWindowOptions 2.5

2

1.5

1

0.5

0 ExistingWindow

RestoredFramewithVacuum RestoredFramewithInterior Glass StormPanel

InfiltrationTestResult (cfm/ft2)

WinterThermalPerformance (U factor)

FullReplacementVendor1

FullReplacementVendor2

SummerThermalPerformance(ShadingCoef)


Window Restoration Technical Comparison Updated 11/11/11

Approach

Detail

Existing  Window

Leaded Glass 

Frame 

Crittall Detroit  1924

Restored  1 Frame with  Vacuum Glass Restored  Frame with  2 Interior Storm  Panel Full  3 Replacement  Vendor 1

Full  4 Replacement  Vendor 2

Vendor

TBD

Summer  Projected Cost  Winter  Thermal  Savings  for AHU‐ Infiltration Test*  Thermal  performanc E1 (Savings over  result (cfm/ft2) performance  e (Shading  Existing  (U‐factor) Coef) Windows)

2.42

1.35

0.926

Restoration  Works Inc.

Simulated leading over  new glass panel. Leading  is applied to one  surface. 

Original Frame. 

0.13

0.6

0.75

10.3%

Restoration  Works Inc.

Original Leading is Original Leading is  restored.  Glass has  faceted appearance  identical to original  windows. 

Original Frame. 

0.01

0.8

0.5

11.1%

Hopes

Simulated leading on  both surfaces of  insulated glass.  

Reduced sightlines.  Frame is 1/2" wider than  original. 

0.02

0.41

0.3

17.9%

Crittall

Simulated leading. 

Frame is the same size 

0.70**

0.48

0.3

TBD**


PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Carl A. Fields Center 1895


KEY CHARACTERISTICS Three Coat Stucco Balloon Framing Fire and Pest Damage Wood Sash and Trim Missing Roof Structure Internal Drainage



Facadesplus 2013 nyc ann beha