Facadesplus 2013 nyc ann beha

INTERVENTIONS

Envelope Composition

Envelope Composition Environment

Envelope Composition Environment Condition

Envelope Composition Environment Condition Treatment Approach

Envelope Composition Environment Condition Treatment Approach Design Intent

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Music Building 1892 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1923-1928 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Carl A. Fields Center 1895

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Music Building 1892

KEY CHARACTERISTICS Wood Sash Brick, Terra Cotta, Bluestone Slate and Copper Roof Wood Framing

existing brown

more recent pale grays and off-whites

later grays and dark greens

original red-brown

Music Building, North Elevation. Sample MUSI.N.4 removed from a window surround.

original red-brown

Music Building, West Elevation. Sample MUSI.W.11 removed from a porch column.

BUILDING CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES INC

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1923-1928

KEY CHARACTERISTICS Three construction Systems Guastavino Tile Steel Frame Masonry Bearing Walls Monumental Spaces 500 Windows

ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ ͬ ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌ ͬ ůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵ ^ŚĂƌĞĚ WƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ &/ ĂŶĚ ĸůŝĂƚĞĚ WƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐ ĂŶĚ hŶĚĞƌŐƌĂĚƵĂƚĞ WƌŽŐƌĂŵ KĸĐĞƐ 'ƌĂĚƵĂƚĞ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ

FICE

EĞǁ DĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů ŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ ůƵƐƚĞƌƐ

dŚĞ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ĂůůŽĐĂƚĞƐ ĮǀĞ ůĞǀĞůƐ ƚŽ ĨĂĐƵůƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚ ƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ŶĞǁ ĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵ ĂŶĚ ŶĞǁ ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů ƐƉĂĐĞƐ ƐĞƚ ďĞůŽǁ ƚŚĞ ĨƌŽŶƚ ƚĞƌƌĂĐĞƐ͘

H A SE II NAR / CLASSROOM CONFERENCE / SEMI SHARED PROGRAMS BFI AND AFFILIATED

PROGRAMS

OFFICE RGRADUATE PROGRAM ECONOMICS AND UNDE AND GRADUATE STUDENTS

RESEARCH

NEW MECHANICAL CIRCULATION LTY RESEARCH AND FACU

dŚĞ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ŝƐ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĞĚ ĨŽƌ ƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ ĂŶĚ ĨĂĐƵůƚLJ ŽĸĐĞƐ͕ ŽŶ ƚŚƌĞĞ ůĞǀĞůƐ͕ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚǁŽ ƌŽǁ ŚŽƵƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĨŽƌŵĞƌ ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌLJ͘ AnnBehaArchitects

AnnBehaArchitects

9

Properties of Window Options 2.5

2

1.5

1

0.5

0 Existing Window

Restored Frame with Vacuum Restored Frame with Interior Glass Storm Panel

Infiltration Test Result (cfm/ft2)

Winter Thermal Performance (U factor)

Full Replacement Vendor 1

Full Replacement Vendor 2

Summer Thermal Performance (Shading Coef)

Window Restoration Technical Comparison Updated 11/11/11

Approach

Detail

Existing Window

Leaded Glass

Frame

Crittall Detroit 1924

Restored 1 Frame with Vacuum Glass Restored Frame with 2 Interior Storm Panel Full 3 Replacement Vendor 1

Full 4 Replacement Vendor 2

Vendor

TBD

Summer Projected Cost Winter Thermal Savings for AHU‐ Infiltration Test* Thermal performanc E1 (Savings over result (cfm/ft2) performance e (Shading Existing (U‐factor) Coef) Windows)

2.42

1.35

0.926

‐

Restoration Works Inc.

Simulated leading over new glass panel. Leading is applied to one surface.

Original Frame.

0.13

0.6

0.75

10.3%

Restoration Works Inc.

Original Leading is Original Leading is restored. Glass has faceted appearance identical to original windows.

Original Frame.

0.01

0.8

0.5

11.1%

Hopes

Simulated leading on both surfaces of insulated glass.

Reduced sightlines.

Frame is 1/2" wider than original.

0.02

0.41

0.3

17.9%

Crittall

Simulated leading.

Frame is the same size

0.70**

0.48

0.3

TBD**

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Carl A. Fields Center 1895

KEY CHARACTERISTICS Three Coat Stucco Balloon Framing Fire and Pest Damage Wood Sash and Trim Missing Roof Structure Internal Drainage