4Q AUSTIN
MARKET REPORT 2015
2
AQUILA KNOWS AUSTIN
KEEPING YOU INFORMED AQUILA Commercial is dedicated to
DISCLAIMER This report utilizes various
providing quality service to our clients. We
real estate and economic data sources. The
understand that real time market data helps
information contained herein is confidential
our clients make smart, informed real estate
and proprietary in nature. No warranties or
decisions. This report is produced and
guarantees are made as to the accuracy of
distributed quarterly. To receive our
the information contained herein.
updates, opt in at aquilacommercial.com.
VIEW FROM THE
EAGLE'S NEST Welcome to 2016, Austin! 2015 was a year of strong commercial real estate growth in the state’s capital. A number of records across individual submarkets and micromarkets were broken over the course of the year with regard to vacancy rates and asking full service rental rates. In 2015, Austin as a whole absorbed 2,806,508 sf of space in both direct and subleasable space. This year also had 2,671,968 sf of office space delivered as new product. At the end of 2014, the citywide vacancy rate
Ryan Parzick Market Research Director AQUILA Commercial parzick@aquilacommercial.com
was 10.56% and now it is at 9.64%. Those two sets of numbers illustrate the continuous strength of the office market in Austin. More space was absorbed than delivered and the vacancy rate went down even with an extraordinary amount of new product coming online. Asking full service rental rates also increased by $1.03/sf from $34.78/sf in 4Q 2014 to $35.81/sf. There is more to come, too. Oracle announced that it will be breaking ground on a three building 560,000 sf campus just outside of downtown while increasing their already large Austin workforce by more than 50% over the next couple of years. Multiple buildings are currently under construction downtown that will deliver within the next two years that have already been 40% pre-leased.
4
Forbes recently tabbed Austin as the No. 1 Boom-
academic departments. In addition to the creation
town in the U.S., which ranks the cities most likely
of the Innovation District, the University Medical
to prosper in the next ten years.¹ They used eight
Center Brackenridge, Austin’s primary trauma hos-
metrics, equally weighted: the percentage of chil-
pital, will be decommissioned and have its func-
dren in the population aged 5 to 14 (families with
tions absorbed into the new teaching hospital. After
younger children often move when school looms or
the transition is complete, UMC Brackenridge is to
more space is need-
be torn down and
ed); the birth rate
redeveloped
from 2010-14; net
a
domestic
migra-
tion
2010-
from
14; the percentage of the population aged 25-44 with a
2015 WAS A YEAR OF STRONG COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE GROWTH IN THE STATE'S CAPITAL.
health-focused
mixed use project incorporating housing, offices, hospitality, and retail.
bachelor’s degree;
With
income
growth
grandiose informa-
from 2010-15; the
tion regarding the
all
of
this
unemployment rate; and population growth from
vibrancy of the Austin market, there are some mark-
2010-14. Austin came out on top “in terms of
ers to keep an eye on. In the Special Report section
population growth, up 13.2% between 2010 and
of this quarter’s Market Report (see pages 7 – 10),
2014, in large part driven by the strongest rate of
we are focusing on the role property taxes play in
net domestic in-migration of the 53 largest metro-
the operating expenses of Austin’s office buildings.
politan areas over the same span: 16.4 per 1,000
Changes in the way Travis County has conducted its
residents. The educated proportion of its population
tax assessments on commercial properties has led
between 25 and 44 is 43.7%, well ahead of the
to higher valuations and therefore higher operating
national average of 33.6%.” Forbes wasn’t the only
expenses. In 2015, our sample data showed prop-
publication to pay attention to Austin. Throughout
erty taxes comprised 45.81% (up from 31.36% in
2015, Austin was ranked highly on a number of
2011) of the overall operating expense value. Large
publications’ lists for top cities.
jumps in operating expenses have the potential to
The addition of the soon-to-be completed University of Texas Dell Medical School should increase the presence of the biotech and medtech industries due to 600,000 sf of education, care, and research space opening in 2016. The area around the new medical school has been designated as an Innovation District with the intent of attracting research facilities, startups, and other innovators in the life sciences field to not only work with the medical school,
depress some of the office growth Austin has seen recently (two buildings in the CBD have operating expenses of $21.75 for 2016). Additionally, the perennial issues of traffic/mobility and affordability for housing have the ability to undermine the strong economic growth of the city. Again, the positive indicators are very strong for Austin as we head into 2016, so we are continuing to anticipate more upbeat news in future Market Reports.
but with the University of Texas’s other world-class
¹ Kotkin, Joel. “America's Next Boom Towns.” Forbes, 14 January 2016. Web. 14 January 2016.
5
into
AUSTIN
TOPS THE CHARTS In 2015, Austin came out on top of a number of lists ranking quality of life, education, jobs and housing. Here is a sampling of Austin’s notable accolades:
1
2
RANKED NO. 1 IN:
• • • • • • • • • • • •
Best Large City to Live In (WalletHub) Best Place for Startup Activity (Kauffman Foundation) Top Cities for Tech Businesses (Savills World Research) Highest Job Creation Index Score (Gallup) Tech Job Leaders (Business Facilities) Top Cities for Startups (Business Facilities) Startup Activity (Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation) Cities Building the Most Housing (Forbes) Cities with the Largest Net Migration Growth (Forbes) U.S. Markets to Watch: Development (Urban Land Institute) Best Public University - University of Texas - Austin (Niche) Healthiest Housing Markets for Cities Over 300,000 Residents (WalletHub)
RANKED NO. 2 IN:
• • • •
Top Cities with Economic Growth Potential (Business Facilities) Multi-Indicator Market Index Score (Top Cities for Stable Housing Market) (Freddie Mac) U.S. Markets to Watch: Overall Real Estate Prospects (Urban Land Institute) U.S. Markets to Watch: Homebuilding (Urban Land Institute)
OTHER TOP TEN RANKINGS: 3rd Best Cities to Start a Career (WalletHub) 4th Most Competitive Cities for the Electronic Industry (Site Selection Magazine) 4th Top Best-Performing Large Cities (Milken Institute) 4th U.S. Markets to Watch: Investment (Urban Land Institute) 5th Most Competitive Cities for the Energy Industry (Site Selection Magazine) 6th Best Cities for Job Seekers (nerdwallet)
6
"In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and [op/ex]." -Ben Franklin
7
SPECIAL REPORT
WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH
ALL THE OP/EX?
The beginning of the calendar year generally is the time landlords adjust their properties’ budgets. Operating expenses (op/ex) are a key component of this fine-tuning, which includes variables such as property taxes, utility costs, janitorial costs, etc. When looking at the appendix of this report (pages 46 – 62), you will notice an almost universal increase in each building’s operating expenses when compared to their previous quarters’ values (84 up arrows, 7 down arrows), which makes sense because utility rates have been raised over the years, labor rates have increased for maintenance and services, and inflation, in general, makes things cost more. What’s staggering, however, is the amount by which these operating expenses have increased. When analyzing all of our competitive set buildings¹ since 2007, the average operating expenses per building increased more this year than any other by a long-shot: an astounding $1.18 more than their 2015 values.
$1.25
$20.00
$1.00
$15.00
$0.75
$10.00
$0.50
$5.00
$0.25
$0.00
$0.00
-$5.00
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Average Year Over Year Change in Op/Ex per Building
2015
2016
-$0.25
Average YOY Change in OpEx
Average Operating Expenses
Changes in Operating Expenses $25.00
So, why is there this suddenly drastic spike in operating expenses? For this quarter’s special report, we delve deeper into one of the primary underlying components of operating expenses: property taxes.
Average Op/Ex
The Travis County Appraisal District (TCAD) has been under some scrutiny lately in regards to its appraisal methods of commercial properties. The City of Austin filed a lawsuit against the appraisal district in the Fall of 2015 stating that they value commercial and vacant land properties well below market values, thereby placing the majority of the tax burden on homeowners². In a 2015 study done by The University of Texas at Austin, it was found in a sample of 417 transactions done between 2012 and 2014 that the average undervaluation by TCAD of the commercial properties sold was 47% of their fair market value³. One of the primary causes of this discrepancy is the fact that Texas is one of only five states to not mandate the disclosure of sales price data for commercial properties. This has undoubtedly caused some eyebrows to raise—including our own—to observe how TCAD sought to alleviate this problem in 2015 and 2016, and the effects it has on property owners as well as tenants.
Ben Franklin Statue; Photo by Mara Buchi
8
SPECIAL REPORT METHODOLOGY: For our study, we took a random sample of thirty buildings across the three primary Austin submarkets (CBD, Northwest and Southwest) whose op/ex numbers we track each quarter, and whose op/ex values changed from the previous quarter, to ensure that the op/ex values are updated and currently reflective of their 2016 values. For these thirty buildings, we then found their appraised values and tax rate for each year from 2011-2015 (TCAD only lists appraisals going back five years, and has not yet released 2016 appraised values). From these values,
Appraised Value × Tax Rate
we were able to calculate the percentage of
Net Rentable Area
Taxes as % of Op/Ex =
operating expenses that is comprised of property taxes for that year using the following formula:
Op/Ex
Where “Op/Ex” is the value charged by landlords for operating expenses per square foot of rentable area. We then averaged the following values for each year across all thirty buildings: Op/Ex ($/sf), Assessed Value ($/sf), and Taxes as % of Op/Ex. We were left with the following summary (see Table 1). To compare these values against one another, we plotted them as percent changes over time with 2011 being the reference point (see Graph 1). Table 1
RESULTS: From Graph 1 the most notable takeaways are:
Year
Average Op/Ex
Average Assessed Value ($/SF)
Average Tax Rate
Average Taxes as % of Op/Ex
2011
$11.79
$158.45
2.36%
31.36%
2012
$11.78
$180.41
2.39%
36.34%
• Dramatic increases in both the
2013
$12.15
$193.54
2.45%
38.74%
Average
and
2014
$12.88
$219.65
2.36%
40.11%
Average Taxes as % of Op/Ex
2015
$13.89
$278.26
2.30%
45.81%
from 2014 to 2015 relative to
2016
$15.71
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assessed
Value
previous years, despite the fact that the actual tax rates decreased over this same time period • Dramatic increase in Average
Graph 1 Percent Changes - Since 2011 80%
Op/Ex from 2015 to 2016 relative to previous years
60%
What does this mean? Primarily, it shows that TCAD has indeed
40%
stepped up their appraisal values of commercial properties drastically since coming under pressure
20%
by the city of Austin, as seen in the 0%
9
2011 Average Op/Ex
2012 2013 2014 Average Assessed Value $/SF
2015 2016 Average Taxes as % of Op/Ex
SPECIAL REPORT
nearly 80% increase in appraised value per square foot over four years, with nearly half of that increase occurring in the last year. Secondly, Average Taxes as % of Op/Ex increased drastically in 2015, whereas Average Op/Ex remained on a relatively steady incline over the same. This shows that landlords were not quite prepared to pass the cost of the higher property taxes onto their tenants. They seem to have made up for this discrepancy in the new op/ex figures, though, as the dramatic spike in Average Op/Ex occurs in 2016.
University Park
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU? Landlords: While we do not expect 2016 appraisal values to decrease from their 2015 values by any means, we believe that the spike experienced in 2015 will help curb the increases in 2016 values as TCAD’s appraisal methods bring commercial properties’ appraisal values nearer to actual fair market values. However, you might drive prospective tenants away with too high of operating expenses in the future if nothing is done to lower the non-tax portion of your op/ex. If money is invested now in equipment that require less maintenance and consume less energy, you will be able to dampen the rate of increase for your operating expenses, thereby making your properties more competitive and attractive to prospective tenants.
Tenants: Don’t let the sticker shock of drastically higher 2016 operating expenses scare you! This spike likely represents a very short-term trend, and while operating expenses will probably not get any cheaper in the near future, they should not continue to grow at the rate they did this year as TCAD’s commercial property appraisals approach true fair market values. Therefore, it would behoove you to factor in these increases into your 2017 budget. Furthermore, if you are a tenant out in the market looking for new space, you can use this year’s high operating expenses as a tool to negotiate for a lower base rental rate. For example, being that operating expenses jumped several dollars per square foot for buildings downtown, that submarket may be an unviable option now. Point to this spike in operating expenses as what has made the space out of your budget, and negotiate the base rental rate down to an affordable level.
¹Competitive set buildings are considered Class A office buildings located in, or near the core of downtown, and newer suburban office buildings that typically have structured parking and amenities such as conference rooms, workout facilities and/or delis. ²City of Austin v. Travis Central Appraisal District Et Al. 126th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. 18 Sept. 2015. ³Gau, George W., Ph.D. An Analysis of TCAD's Commercial Valuations For City of Austin. 11 Mar. 2015.
10
AUSTIN CITYWIDE 4Q UPDATE 4Q 2015 was another great quarter for the Austin market, building on a very healthy 2015. 4Q 2015 added another 581,073 sf of new office space, bringing 2015’s total of new product to 2,671,968 sf. Outpacing the new deliveries was absorption, as this metric cracked the 1 million sf mark this quarter, with 1,070,732 sf of space absorbed. For the year, a hefty 2,806,508 sf was absorbed, bringing down the overall vacancy rate to 9.64% from 4Q 2014’s 10.56%. The overall Class A full service asking rate did decline this quarter to $35.81/sf, but is still $1.03/sf higher than it was at the close of 2014.
Inside 7700 Parmer; Photo by: Third Eye Photography
1,070,732 SF Net Absorption
9.64%
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$35.81
Avg. Class A Full Service Rental Rate
12
SNAPSHOT:
CAPITAL MARKETS MAJOR SALES TRANSACTIONS 301
7700 PARMER
SOLD CONGRESS
SOLD LANE
Market
CBD
Market
NW
Market
South
Class
A
Class
A
Class
B
Size (SF)
428,419
Size (SF)
1,023,000
Size (SF)
68,058
Buyer
Prudential Real Estate
Buyer
Accesso Partners
Buyer
OakPoint Real Estate
Seller
Commonwealth Partners
Seller
Spear Street Capital
Seller
Braun Enterprises
Price
N/A
Price
N/A
Price
$7,705,000
Price/SF
N/A
Price/SF
N/A
Price/SF
$113.21
ENCINO TRACE
SOLD I & II
301 Congress
13
PARK PLACE
SOLD I & II
ENTERPRISE
SOLD PLAZA
Market
SW
Market
North
Class
A
Class
B
Size (SF)
320,000
Size (SF)
64,155
Buyer
Brandywine Realty Trust and DRA Advisors
Buyer
OPRE
Seller
Brandywine Realty Trust
Seller
Farahani Family
Price
$91,300,000
Price
$5,950,000
Price/SF
$285.31
Price/SF
$92.74
Notes
Brandywine retained 50% interest in the deal
MAJOR LEASES SIGNED Leases signed this quarter over 20,000 sf:
CBD
• Main Street Hub increased their office space by moving to 46,960 sf in One Congress Plaza. They are currently subleasing their previous space in the Perry Brooks Tower.
• Outbound Engine signed a 40,207 sf lease in San Jacinto Center.
CENTRAL
• WeWork continued their expansion into Austin by signing a lease for a whole floor at University Park, occupying 24,747 sf.
• Kendra Scott expanded their recently signed lease at Lamar Central for another 20,000 sf of office space.
NORTHWEST
• LDR Spine renewed and expanded their lease at Aspen Lake One to occupy a total of 88,000 sf. • BancVue renewed their lease at Lakeview Plaza for 62,193 sf. • Planview was the first tenant to sign at the newly delivered Research Park Plaza V by leasing 51,624 sf of space.
AUSTIN SUBMARKET MAP CBD Central East/Northeast North Northwest Round Rock South/Southeast Southwest
14
AUSTIN OFFICE
DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE This timeline shows office projects over 30,000 SF that have either broken ground or will be breaking ground soon and the estimated year and quarter of delivery.
2016
2017
1Q
1Q
5th + Colorado
179,000 SF
CBD
Domain 1
124,571 SF
Northwest
Eastside Village
94,500 SF
East
Lakes at TechRidge Building C
39,400 SF
East
NorthShore
23,592 SF
CBD
905 & 906 Broadmoor*
345,000 SF
Northwest
La Frontera Plaza
97,941 SF
Round Rock
Domain 5
74,787 SF
Northwest
*Already existing-coming to market 2Q 2016
3Q
Braker Point III†
195,230 SF
Northwest
Pioneer Bank Building
46,000 SF
Central
The Diamond Building at Mueller
35,015 SF
East
†Already existing-coming to market 3Q 2016 4Q
15
489,404 SF
CBD
2Q
801 Barton Springs
90,500
South
3Q
2Q
Domain 8
500 W 2nd
255,000 SF
Northwest
Shoal Creek Walk
218,432 SF
CBD
îƒĄ PLANNED Future Developments
Future Developments
10721 Domain Dr.
308,000 SF
Northwest
310 Comal
37,500 SF
East
405 Colorado
TBD SF
CBD
604 W 6th Street
31,035 SF
CBD
Amber Oaks Phase I
90,300 SF
Amber Oaks Phase II Amber Oaks Phase III
The Backyard Buildings B, J, & H
171,450 SF
Southwest
The Lakes at TechRidge Building A
48,800 SF
East
Northwest
The Lakes at TechRidge Building B
48,800 SF
East
90,300 SF
Northwest
The Park @ Mueller
116,000 SF
East
45,000 SF
Northwest
The Terrace 3
203,130 SF
Southwest
Aspen Lake Three
128,700 SF
Northwest
The Terrace 4
285,663 SF
Southwest
Austin American Statesman
TBD SF
CBD
The Terrace 5
218,809 SF
Southwest
Cityline at MLK
150,000 SF
East
The Waterfront
625,000 SF
South
Four Points Centre Building 3
250,000 SF
Northwest
Third + Shoal
338,279 SF
CBD
Four Points Centre Building 4
80,000 SF
Northwest
Waller Creek Center
325,000 SF
CBD
Frontera Ridge
400,000 SF
Round Rock
Lantana Ridge I
87,500 SF
Southwest
Lantana Ridge II
87,500 SF
Southwest
Mueller Market District
2,000,000 SF
East
Novare/Post Office
TBD SF
CBD
Paloma Ridge C
112,500 SF
Northwest
Plaza Saltillo
125,000 SF
East
Rainey Gateway
355,000 SF
CBD
Regency Park
90,000 SF
Southwest
Rollingwood Center III
107,000 SF
Southwest
St. Elmo
225,000 SF
South
16
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 4Q UPDATE Another quarter of vacancy rate decline occurred this quarter across the CBD for all office building classes. The rate dropped 76 basis points from an already low 7.83% to 7.07% for all direct and subleasable space. Our competitive set of downtown office buildings (the list of Class A buildings located in, or near, the core of downtown can be found on page 50), moved to a shockingly low 4.53%. Next quarter, the competitive set of buildings will grow larger with the delivery of the NorthShore office building (23,592 sf) and 5th + Colorado (179,000 sf).
Interior of 301 Congress; Photo by: Scott Mason Photography
3,066 SF Net Absorption
7.07%
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$43.64
Avg. Class A Full Service Rental Rate
18
CBD UPDATE As of the end of 4Q 2015, NorthShore is 100% pre-leased and 5th + Colorado is 31% pre-leased with some other deals reportedly in the works. There will not be another new office building delivered until 1Q 2017, when the already 42% pre-leased 500 W 2nd will bring 489,404 sf to the downtown skyline. With that being noted, vacancy rates should remain low for the foreseeable future. For the year, vacancy
19 Hartland Plaza Lobby; Photo by: Scott Mason Photography
rates in the competitive set of buildings dropped almost three whole percentage points from 7.52% in 1Q 2015 to 4.53% in 4Q 2015. This drop occurred even with the addition of 143,151 sf of office space that came with the delivery of the Seaholm Power Plant redevelopment. Even more impressive was the lowering of the vacancy rate across all class types during 2015, plummeting from 12.81% to the 7.07% of this quarter.
Class A asking full service rental rates are showing a decline for the overall CBD market this quarter, falling from $44.17/sf last quarter to $43.64/sf in 4Q 2015. Conversely, the competitive set has spiked upward by $3.33/sf this quarter, surging from a previous record of $48.70/sf to a new all-time high of $52.03/sf. The competitive set of buildings include the new operating expense values for the upcoming year, whereas it appears this is not the case for the CBRE dataset (please see the Special Report found on pages 7 – 10 of this report to see why operating expenses have climbed so quickly for 2016). The large upswing in operating expenses plays a major role in the large jump in full service rates for the CBD.
There were not any new deliveries this quarter in the CBD, but there are four buildings currently under construction. The previously mentioned buildings under construction (NorthShore, 5th + Colorado, and 500 W 2nd St) are joined by Shoal Creek Walk, which will deliver 218,432 sf of leasable office space in 3Q 2017 and is already 39% preleased to Cirrus Logic. Like last quarter, only two existing buildings have blocks of available space above 20,000 sf this quarter. The low vacancy rates and limited large blocks are continuing to limit companies looking to grow downtown or move into the CBD.
20
CBD
BY THE NUMBERS CBD SUBMARKET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
9,084,414
1,032,112
17,164
11.81%
$41.45
2014 Q2
9,084,414
1,021,461
(13,728)
11.96%
$40.88
2014 Q3
9,252,285
1,041,014
153,098
11.90%
$41.39
2014 Q4
9,252,285
802,517
227,661
9.44%
$43.13
2015 Q1
9,768,770
1,135,835
139,236
12.81%
$43.83
2015 Q2
9,809,755
870,240
291,638
10.20%
$41.90
2015 Q3
9,809,755
672,222
232,375
7.83%
$44.17
2015 Q4
9,732,884
631,228
3,066
7.07%
*Absorption includes sublease space
15%
1,200
12%
900
9%
600
6%
300
3%
0
0% 2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
$45
20%
$44
16%
$43
12%
$42
8%
$41
4%
0% 2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
21
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY RATES VS. RENTAL RATES
2014 Q1
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
95%
250
93%
200
91%
150
89%
100
87%
50
85%
0
83%
(50)
81% 2014 Q1
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$40
300
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
1,500
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
2014 Q1
$43.64 Numbers based on CBRE statistics.
AUSTIN CBD OFFICE RENTAL RATE PROJECTIONS $55 3% Job Growth
$50
1% Job Growth
Full Service Rental Rates ($)
$45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15
Historic Rental Rate
AQUILA Model
3% Job Growth
1% Job Growth
AUSTIN CBD OFFICE VACANCY RATE PROJECTIONS 35%
11.0 Shoal Creek Walk
30%
10.5 500 W 2nd
10.0
5th + Colorado NorthShore
20%
9.5
15%
9.0
10%
1% Job Growth
5%
3% Job Growth
0%
Market Size
8.5 8.0
Market Size (Millions of SF)
Total Vacancy Rate (%)
25%
7.5
Historic Vacancy Rate
AQUILA Model
3% Job Growth
1% Job Growth
22
CBD DEVELOPMENT & LARGE AVAILABILITY Stre
et
SHO CRE AL E WA K LK
Lam
604 W. SIX TH
5TH WES & T
ar B
lvd.
5th
NO POS VARE/ TO FFIC E HOT ZAZ EL 5 GAB A/ COL TH + LES ORA DO
TH EPE E NDE
N.
IND
NT T HIR THE D AUS S HOA + TIN L PRO G PER RES REEN W 500 IDEN W. TIAL ATER 2ND TOW ER NO RTH SHO RE
PER R BRO Y O TOW KS ER ALO F ELEM T & ENT
4 COL 05 ORA D
O
801 BA SPR RTON ING S
23
Con g
Rd.
et
ings
tre
Spr
S. 1st S
ton
Ces ar
Cha
vez
St.
WA LL CRE CEN EK TER
ress
Ave .
O CON NE G PLA RESS ZA
Bar
6
AU AM STIN E STA RICAN TESM AN
RAI
LARGE BLOCKS OF CONTIGUOUS AVAILABILITY Building OFFICE UNDER CONSTRUCTION HOTEL/RESIDENTIAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION One Congress Plaza FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Perry Brooks Tower EXISTING AVAILABILITIES 20,000 SF + of available space
Max. Contiguous
44,055 SF
31,037 SF
1,409 (direct) + 28,000 SF (sublease)
22,400 SF (sublease)
OFFICE PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Building
H HOU YATT SE H OTE L HOL & H IDAY OTE I L IN NN DIG O
11th
Stree
t
treet
Est. Delivery
% Preleased
Total SF
500 W 2nd
42%
489,404 SF
1Q 2017
5th + Colorado
28%
179,000 SF
1Q 2016
100%
23,592 SF
1Q 2016
0%
90,500 SF
2Q 2017
42%
218,432 SF
3Q 2017
NorthShore 801 Barton Springs Shoal Creek Walk
OTHER PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Units/Rooms
6th S
.
Available SF
5th & West
Est. Delivery
Max. Contiguous
154 Units
4Q 2017
422 Rooms
3Q 2017
1,066 Rooms
3Q 2017
Hotel Indigo/Holiday Inn Express
300 Rooms
2Q 2016
Hyatt House Hotel
190 Rooms
4Q 2016
436 Units
1Q 2017
The Austin Proper
250 Rooms, 120 Units
2Q 2017
The Independent
370 Units
3Q 2018
Aloft & Element Fairmont
NorthShore
FUTURE/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
FAIR M HOT ONT EL
LER RAI K GAT NEY R EWA Y
70 INE Y
Units/Rooms
405 Colorado 604 W 6th Street
Est. Delivery
Max. Contiguous
TBD
Office
31,035 SF
Office
Austin American Statesman
TBD
Office
Novare/Post Office
TBD
Office
Rainey Gateway
355,000 SF
Office
Third + Shoal
338,279 SF
Office
Waller Creek Center
325,000 SF
Office
164 Units
Multifamily
TBD
Multifamily
226 Units, 160 Rooms
Hotel/Multifamily
70 Rainey Green Water Residential Tower Hotel Zaza/Gables
24
AVAILABILITY SUMMARY
CBD CLASS A SUBLEASE SPACE AVAILABLE SPACE
3
3
3 29
2
28
2
27
23
2,177 SF
2
25
25
2
24
24
2
23
23
2
22
2
22
22
31,051 SF
22
21
21
21
32,603 SF
21
21
2
20
20
20
32,603 SF
20
20
2
33,931 SF
19
19
1
1,421 SF
7,165 SF
19
19
18
18
18
33,931 SF
18
17
17
17
17
31,822 SF
17
16
16
16
16
31,822 SF
16
15
15
15
15
31,530 SF
14
14
14
14
23,798 SF
13
13
12
12
11
11
10 9
2,502 SF
1,648 SF
1,414 SF
18
19,000 SF
18
17
19,000 SF
17
1
2,960 SF
16
19,000 SF
16
1
15
2,018 SF
15
6,500 SF
15
1
14
4,136 SF
14
19,000 SF
14
1
1,455 SF
782 SF
1
13
13
13
13
19,000 SF
13
1
12
12
12
12
19,000 SF
12
1
11
11
11
11
11
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
8
7,254 SF
3,000 SF
8
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
1,620 SF
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6,593 SF
2
2
4,669 SF
2
6,432 SF 2,358 SF
2
2
2
2
2
7,887 SF
1
1
1
2,195 SF
1
1
1
1
1
2,893 SF
25
26
22
19
2,809 SF
2
26
17,218 SF
18,922 SF
2 12,405 SF
100 Congress 100 Congress Ave.
300 W 6th 300 W 6th St.
301 Congress 301 Congress Ave.
400 W 15th 400 W 15th St.
500 W 2nd 500 W 2nd St.
501 Congress 501 Congress Ave.
515 Congress 515 Congress Ave.
5th + Colorado 201 W 5th St.
600 Congress 600 Congress Ave.
411,536 SF 22 Floors 95% Leased $36.50 - $37.00 NNN 20.84 Op/Ex $57.34 - $57.84 Gross
454,225 SF 23 Floors 99% Leased $36.00 NNN $21.75 Op/Ex $57.75 Gross
418,338 SF 22 Floors 96% Leased $33.00 - $35.00 NNN $17.95 Op/Ex $50.95 - $52.95 Gross
281,196 SF 17 Floors 97% Leased $24.50 NNN $15.92 Op/Ex $40.42 Gross
489,404 SF 29 Floors 42% Pre-Leased $36.50 NNN $15.50 Op/Ex $52.00 Gross
122,747 SF 5 Floors 85% Leased $20.00 - $32.00 NNN $21.27 Op/Ex $41.27 - $53.27 Gross
258,176 SF 26 Floors 97% Leased $32.00 NNN $18.05 Op/Ex $50.05 Gross
179,000 SF 18 Floors 31% Pre-Leased $34.00 - $35.00 NNN $15.20 Op/Ex $49.20 - $50.20 Gross
503,951 SF 32 Floors 97% Leased $33.00 NNN $15.80 Op/Ex $48.80 Gross
1
33 32
32
31
31
30
30
30
30
29
29
29
29
28
28
28
28
27
27
27
27
26
26
26
26
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
22
22
22
22
21
21
21
21
21
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
21
16,711
18
18
17
17
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
21,218 SF
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
21,218 SF
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
21,218 SF
11
11
7,332 SF
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
21,218 SF
10
10
5,638 SF
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
21,218 SF
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
21,218 SF
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
3,715 SF
7
7
7
6
6
1,881 SF
6
6
5
5
8,022 SF
4
3
5,275 SF
2
1
10,821 SF
5
4,900 SF
9
1,761 SF
8
8
23,142 SF
8
8
7
7
5,818 SF
7
7
6
6
6
2,118 SF
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
693 SF 3,520 SF
4
4
4
4
4
11,216 SF
4
4
3
850 SF 1,716 SF
3
3
3
3
3
3,113 SF
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
816 Congress 816 Congress Ave.
Austin Centre 701 Brazos St.
Chase Tower 221 W 6th St.
Colorado Tower 303 Colorado St.
Frost Bank Tower 401 Congress Ave.
IBC Bank Plaza 500 W 5th St.
One Congress Plaza 111 Congress Ave.
San Jacinto Center 98 San Jacinto Blvd.
Shoal Creek Walk 835 W 6th St.
434,081 SF 20 Floors 94% Leased $27.00 - $29.00 NNN $17.59 Op/Ex $44.59 - 46.59 Gross
326,335 SF 16 Floors 96% Leased $28.00 NNN $17.65 Op/Ex $45.65 Gross
389,503 SF 21 Floors 96% Leased $31.00 NNN $19.84 Op/Ex $50.84 Gross
373,334 SF 30 Floors 100% Leased $34.00 NNN $16.83 Op/Ex $50.83 Gross
535,078 SF 33 Floors 100% Leased $38.00 NNN $21.75 Op/Ex $59.75 Gross
194,749 SF 13 Floors 100% Leased $30.00 NNN $21.00 Op/Ex $51.00 Gross
518,385 SF 30 Floors 92% Leased $38.00 - $40.00 NNN $17.77 Op/Ex $55.77 - $57.77 Gross
406,279 SF 21 Floors 100% Leased $38.00 - $40.00 NNN $18.75 Op/Ex $56.75 - $58.75 Gross
218,432 SF 14 Floors 42% Pre-Leased $31.00 - $35.00 NNN $16.50 Op/Ex $47.50 - $51.50 Gross
26
AUSTIN, TX
UFCU Plaza; Photo of: by Name Scott Mason Photography Photo Name; Photo Courtesy
NORTHWEST SUBMARKET 4Q UPDATE The vacancy rate for all classes of buildings in the Northwest (NW) submarket fell from 9.96% to 8.99%. The competitive set of buildings (the list of newer suburban office buildings that typically have structured parking, amenities such as conference rooms, workout facilities and/or delis can be found on page 55) also saw a drop in the vacancy rate, dipping down to 9.91% from last quarter’s 10.64%.
410,012 SF Net Absorption
8.99%
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$34.14
Avg. Class A Full Service Rental Rate
28
NORTHWEST
SUBMARKET UPDATE One item of note that was mentioned in last quarter’s report, the overall market net rentable area tracked by CBRE for both 3Q 2015 and 4Q 2015 does not include Paloma Ridge A & B, two Class A buildings combining for 212,400 sf that delivered in 3Q 2015. These two buildings are 100% vacant and their exclusion from the overall office vacancy rate significantly deflates its value. The Paloma Ridge buildings are included in the competitive set, though. Impressively, the competitive set vacancy rate still dropped even with the delivery of three new buildings (Research Park Plaza V, Quarry Oaks III, and Aspen Lake Two). As 2015 came to a close, all-time records were set across each of the three micromarkets. Records were broken in the NW submarket’s full service asking rental rates in 4Q 2015, as well. Across all Class A buildings, full service asking rental rates increased for the eighth straight quar-
Aspen Lake Rendering
29
ter, jumping from $33.26/sf to $34.14/sf. The competitive set rates also increased this quarter, climbing to $34.30/sf from $33.55/sf. In our competitive set, 36% of the buildings we track raised their base asking rates, whereas only 1.5% lowered their rate. As mentioned previously, there were three deliveries this quarter in the NW submarket. Both Research Park Plaza V (172,854 sf – 30% pre-leased to Planview) and Aspen Lake Two (129,000 sf – 100% pre-leased to Q2) are located in the Far Northwest micromarket and Quarry Oaks III (137,615 sf – 100% pre-leased to Bazaarvoice) is located in the Arboretum/Domain micromarket. As 2015 closes, there are only three projects currently under construction in the NW submarket, all located in the Domain and 0% pre-leased (Domain 1 – 1Q 2016 delivery – 124,571 sf, Domain 5 – 2Q 2016 delivery – 74,787 sf, and Domain 8 – 4Q 2016 delivery – 255,000 sf).
NORTHWEST MICRO MARKETS Arboretum/Domain Far Northwest Shepherd Mountain
The Arboretum/Domain $35.16/sf asking rental micromarket’s vacancy rate is the highest value rate went down and of the three NW microasking rental rate went markets. AS 2015 CAME TO A CLOSE, up from last quarter, ALL-TIME RECORDS WERE The Far Northwest saw rebounding from a SET ACROSS EACH OF THE a large net absorption quarter that saw oppoTHREE MICROMARKETS. this quarter, yet still had site movement for each vacancy rates increase metric. Both the 5.99% to 16.70% from last vacancy rate and the quarter’s 15.48%. Palo$34.82/sf average asking full service rental rate ma Ridge A & B still sits vacant and the newly are all-time records for this micromarket. The three delivered Research Park Plaza V added 121,229 Domain projects will be entering the market at a sf of vacant space to the micromarket. The 100% time when new product is warranted. pre-leased Aspen Lake Two delivery helped mitiThe Shepherd Mountain micromarket continues gate the vacancy rate increase, though. The asking to strengthen as it decreased vacancy rates for full service rental rate did rise, though, to a record the fourth straight quarter (now at 9.42%) and $32.77 for this micromarket. Prior to last quarter’s increased asking full service rental rates for a decline in asking rental rates, the Far Northwest staggering fifteenth straight quarter. Just like the micromarket had fourteen straight quarters of inArboretum/Domain micromarket, both of these creasing rental rates. measurements are all-time records. Additionally, the
30
NORTHWEST
BY THE NUMBERS NORTHWEST OVERALL SUBMARKET PERFORMANCE Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
16,747,039
1,635,834
102,128
10.21%
$29.20
2014 Q2
16,697,337
1,493,813
(12,658)
10.02%
$29.89
2014 Q3
16,697,337
1,566,544
(103,939)
10.64%
$30.65
2014 Q4
16,817,337
1,540,054
137,486
10.46%
$30.83
2015 Q1
17,154,310
1,879,975
98,887
11.65%
$32.06
2015 Q2
17,269,310
1,819,734
116,457
11.56%
$32.74
2015 Q3
17,269,310
1,665,124
276,295
9.96%
$33.26
2015 Q4
17,535,625
1,283,335
410,012
8.99%
$34.14
*Absorption includes sublease space
Numbers based on CBRE statistics.
15%
600
95%
2,000
12%
450
93%
1,500
9%
300
91%
1,000
6%
150
89%
500
3%
0
87%
0
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
(150)
2015 Q4
$36
16%
$34
13%
$32
10%
$30
7%
4% 2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
31
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY RATES VS. RENTAL RATES
2014 Q1
85% 2014 Q1
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$28
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
2,500
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
NORTHWEST SUBMARKET OFFICE RENTAL RATE PROJECTIONS $40
Full Service Rental Rates ($)
$35
3% Job Growth
1% Job Growth
$30
$25
$20
$15
Historic Rental Rate
AQUILA Model
3% Job Growth
1% Job Growth
NORTHWEST SUBMARKET OFFICE VACANCY RATE PROJECTIONS Braker Pointe III 905 & 906 Broadmoor Domain 5
25%
16.7 1% Job Growth
15%
20.0
18.3
Domain 1
20% Total Vacancy Rate (%)
Domain 8
15.0
3% Job Growth
10%
13.3
5%
11.7
0%
10.0
Market Size
Historic Vacancy Rate
AQUILA Model
3% Job Growth
Market Size (Millions of SF)
30%
1% Job Growth 32
CEDAR PARK
ROUND ROCK 9 8
PFLUGERVILLE
21
4 3 1 2
1413 16 151718
10
6
LAKE TRAVIS
ARBORETUM
19
12
DOMAIN
11
SHEPHERD MOUNTAIN
5 7
22 20
NORTHWEST AUSTIN LARGE OFFICE AVAILABILITY 20,000 SF + of available space Building
33
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Total Available SF
1
7700 Parmer - Bldg B
31,500
-
31,500
2
7700 Parmer - Bldg C
23,693
-
23,693
3
Amber Oaks F
79,732
-
79,732
4
Amber Oaks J
6,245
33,147
39,392
5
Atrium Office Centre
20,340
-
20,340
6
Domain 3
-
20,816
20,816
7
Lakewood Center I
-
45,020
45,020
8
Paloma Ridge A
106,200
-
106,200
9
Paloma Ridge B
106,200
-
106,200
10
Park Central I
15,375
23,326
38,701
11
Park Centre Bldg. 3
57,562
-
57,562
12
Prominent Pointe I
28,979
-
28,979
13
Research Park Number Five
39,237
-
39,237
14
Research Park Place 8
33,518
-
15
Research Park Plaza V
121,229
121,229
16
Research Tech Center Bldg 2
22,295
22,295
17
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 4
93,737
-
93,737
18
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 5
23,783
-
23,783
19
River Place Corp Park Bldg VII
-
21,477
21,477
20
The Park at 8300 N. MoPac
6,911
31,958
38,869
21
Travesia Corporate Park 1-3
33,555
33,945
67,500
22
UFCU Plaza
28,695
-
28,695
33,518
NORTHWEST AUSTIN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT Building
Total SF
Percent Preleased
Estimated Delivery
Status
1
Domain 1
124,571
0%
1Q 2016
Under Construction
2
Domain 5
74,787
0%
2Q 2016
Under Construction
3
905 & 906 Broadmoor*
345,000
0%
2Q 2016
Coming to Market
4
Braker Point III†
195,230
0%
3Q 2016
Coming to Market
5
Domain 8
291,000
0%
4Q 2016
Under Construction
6
10721 Domain Dr.
308,000
0%
Planned
Planned
7
Amber Oaks Phase I
90,300
0%
Planned
Planned
8
Amber Oaks Phase II
90,300
0%
Planned
Planned
9
Amber Oaks Phase III
45,000
0%
Planned
Planned
10
Aspen Lake Three
128,700
0%
Planned
Planned
11
Four Points Centre Bldg 3
250,000
0%
Planned
Planned
12
Four Points Centre Bldg 4
80,000
0%
Planned
Planned
13
Paloma Ridge C
112,500
0%
Planned
Planned
*Already existing - Coming to market 2Q 2016 †Already existing - Coming to market 3Q 2016
Under Construction
Planned
ROUND ROCK
CEDAR PARK
13
10
LAKE TRAVIS
PFLUGERVILLE
7 8 9
11 12
ARBORETUM
15 4 6 2
3
DOMAIN SHEPHERD MOUNTAIN 34
SOUTHWEST SUBMARKET 4Q UPDATE Across all classes of buildings, the Southwest (SW) submarket had a vacancy rate drop of 349 basis points from last quarter to 9.80%. Juxtaposing that large drop with the rise in competitive set vacancy rates (moving from 7.77% to 10.80%) can be somewhat confusing. This can be explained by the methodology CBRE employs when collecting vacancy data. They count leased space that has not been moved into as vacant, hence “available.” Since we use CBRE’s data for the overall market, this contradicts the dataset for the competitive set buildings (the list of newer suburban office buildings that typically have structured parking, amenities such as conference rooms, workout facilities and/ or delis can be found on page 61).
460,460 SF Net Absorption
9.80%
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$35.85
Avg. Class A Full Service Rental Rate
SOUTHWEST
SUBMARKET UPDATE In 2Q 2015, three buildings delivered, bringing a total of 680,968 sf to the SW submarket. As the tenants have been moving into these buildings, the CBRE availabilities are going down. In the competitive set, we had already counted those leases, so we had a drop in vacancy last quarter. This quarter, Encino Trace II has delivered with only 17.8% of the 158,137 sf leased, while
Bazaarvoice has moved out of 3900 San Clemente building to go into their new space in Quarry Oaks III in the NW submarket. These two events have brought 265,436 sf to the market and has pushed the competitive set vacancy rate upwards, to be more in line with the CBRE value for this quarter (9.80% vs 10.80%).
SOUTHWEST MICRO MARKETS Far Southwest Near Southwest
37
Last quarter, the asking full service rental rates for all Class A buildings in the SW submarket climbed to a record high $35.03/sf. This quarter pushed the record even higher to $35.85/sf. The competitive set moved even higher to $38.15/ sf, escalating $0.54/sf over the course of the last quarter. This was the sixteenth consecutive quarter that the competitive set grew in asking rental rates. With Encino Trace II delivering this quarter, no additional major projects are currently under construction in SW Austin. Last quarter, we predicted a bump up in the competitive set’s vacancy rate with Encino Trace II’s delivery and the Bazaarvoice departure, but also noted that we felt vacancy rates would start to drop again. We are not budging from that stance as the SW submarket remains a big draw for tenants due to its unique views, access and proximity to downtown, desirable neighborhoods and a rich talent pool. The Near Southwest micromarket saw its overall vacancy rate climb again from 9.61% to 10.76%, after last quarter’s 235 basis point increase. Both The Park on Barton Creek 2 and Barton Skyway II had over 20,000 sf come available. The Near
Southwest micromarket has continued the trend of increasing asking rental rates every quarter for 19 consecutive quarters. The 4Q 2015 full service asking rate is another record for this micromarket, crossing over the $40/sf threshold for the first time at $40.59/sf. After last quarter’s large drop in vacancy rates for the Far Southwest micromarket, this quarter swung the other way with an increase in 410 basis points in the total vacancy rate. The 10.81% vacancy rate is the highest this micromarket has seen since 2Q 2012. The two primary causes for this rapid increase are the Bazaarvoice departure from the submarket to the NW submarket and the delivery of the partially leased Encino Trace II. Otherwise, there has been normal movement of tenants within this micromarket that should not be cause for much alarm. Landlords continue to take advantage of the strong market by increasing the asking full service rental rates, as illustrated by the increase to $36.75/sf from last quarter’s $36.31/sf.
38
SOUTHWEST
BY THE NUMBERS SOUTHWEST OVERALL SUBMARKET PERFORMANCE Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
9,382,293
703,789
(22,457)
8.66%
$31.19
2014 Q2
9,382,293
853,812
(150,296)
10.26%
$30.72
2014 Q3
9,458,793
653,880
164,619
9.24%
$31.38
2014 Q4
9,418,793
640,998
42,081
8.41%
$34.87
2015 Q1
9,446,430
589,875
66,172
7.98%
$34.35
2015 Q2
10,109,725
1,070,609
182,561
12.21%
$33.76
2015 Q3
10,257,625
1,192,565
121,673
12.29%
$35.03
2015 Q4
10,484,922
769,552
460,460
9.80%
$35.85
*Absorption includes sublease space
Numbers based on CBRE statistics.
15%
1,200
12%
900
9%
600
6%
300
3%
0
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$36
12%
$34
8%
$32
4%
$30
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
39
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY RATES VS. RENTAL RATES 16%
94%
400
92%
200
90%
0
88%
(200)
2015 Q4
$38
600
86% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
1,500
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
SOUTHWEST SUBMARKET OFFICE RENTAL RATE PROJECTIONS $40
3% Job Growth
$35
Full Service Rental Rates ($)
1% Job Growth
$30
$25
$20
$15
Historic Rental Rate
AQUILA Model
3% Job Growth
1% Job Growth
25%
12.0
20%
10.6
15%
1% Job Growth
3% Job Growth
10%
9.2
7.8
5%
6.4
0%
5.0
Market Size
Historic Vacancy Rate
AQUILA Model
3% Job Growth
Market Size (Millions of SF)
Total Vacancy Rate (%)
SOUTHWEST SUBMARKET OFFICE VACANCY RATE PROJECTIONS
1% Job Growth
40
5
1
WEST LAKE HILLS BEE CAVE
9
BARTON CREEK TH SOU TP ES W
3
K
W
12
Y
4 8
11 2
7
10
6
SOUTHWEST AUSTIN LARGE OFFICE AVAILABILITY 20,000 SF + of available space Building
41
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Total Available SF
1
3900 San Clemente
135,366
135,366
2
Encino Trace II
130,070
-
130,070
3
Rollingwood Center I & II
7,878
110,108
117,986
4
The Summit 1-5
52,939
-
52,939
5
3700 San Clemente
51,934
6
The Park on Barton Creek 1
-
7
The Park on Barton Creek 2
38,900
8
Rialto II
9
CityView Center
10
Parkway at Oak Hill 1 & II
23,644
11
The Terrace 6
22,771
-
22,771
12
Barton Skyway II
21,435
-
21,435
51,934 42,527
42,527 38,900
1,588
36,421
38,009
-
24,478
24,478 23,644
SOUTHWEST AUSTIN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT Building
Total SF
Percent Preleased
Estimated Delivery
Status
171,450
0%
Planned
Planned
1
The Backyard - Buildings B, J, & H
2
Lantana Ridge I
87,500
0%
Planned
Planned
3
Lantana Ridge II
87,500
0%
Planned
Planned
4
Regency Park
90,000
0%
Planned
Planned
5
Rollingwood Center III
107,000
0%
Planned
Planned
6
The Terrace 3
203,130
0%
Planned
Planned
7
The Terrace 4
285,663
0%
Planned
Planned
8
The Terrace 5
218,809
0%
Planned
Planned
Planned
WEST LAKE HILLS
1
BEE CAVE
BARTON CREEK TH SOU TP ES W
5
K
W
Y
2
6 8 7
3
4
42
AVAILABILITY SUMMARY SOUTHWEST CLASS A 4,901 SF
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
NSW
11,073 SF
NSW
7,237 SF
NSW
NSW
6,026 SF
4 3,596 SF
2
1
1
NSW
NSW
Barton Oaks Plaza I 901 S Mopac Expy
Barton Oaks Plaza II 901 S Mopac Expy
Barton Oaks Plaza III 901 S Mopac Expy
Barton Oaks Plaza IV 901 S Mopac Expy
Barton Oaks Plaza V 901 S Mopac Expy
One Barton Skyway 1501 S Mopac Expy
5 Floors 99,404 SF 95% Leased $27.00 NNN $15.98 Op/Ex $42.98 Gross
5 Floors 116,368 SF 90% Leased $26.50 NNN $15.56 Op/Ex $42.06 Gross
5 Floors 121,467 SF 94% Leased $26.50 NNN $14.59 Op/Ex $41.09 Gross
5 Floors 112,000 SF 100% Leased
5 Floors 119,549 SF 95% Leased $26.00 NNN $14.47 Op/Ex $40.47 Gross
4 Floors 195,324 SF 98% Leased $25.50 - $26.00 NNN $13.40 Op/Ex $38.90 - $39.40 Gross
$41.00 Gross
3
2
5 42,671 SF
4
3
42,369 SF
3
3
3
3
3
2
12,782 SF
2
2
2
2
2
1
33,214 SF
1
1
1
1
1
FSW
FSW
7,048 SF
6,726 SF
FSW
FSW
FSW
1,590 SF
FSW
Encino Trace I 5707 Southwest Pkwy
Encino Trace II 5707 Southwest Pkwy
Las Cimas I 804 Las Cimas Pkwy
Las Cimas II 807 Las Cimas Pkwy
Las Cimas III 805 Las Cimas Pkwy
Las Cimas IV 900 S Capital of Tx Hwy
4 floors 161,606 SF 100% Leased $23.50 NNN $11.00 Op/Ex $34.50 Gross
4 floors 158,137 SF 18% Leased $23.50 NNN $11.00 Op/Ex $34.50 Gross
3 Floors 85,000 SF 92% Leased $24.50 NNN $14.29 Op/Ex $38.79 Gross
4 Floors 156,069 SF 100% Leased $26.00 NNN $13.83 Op/Ex $39.83 Gross
4 Floors 157,418 SF 96% Leased $26.00 NNN $13.93 Op/Ex $39.93 Gross
5 Floors 138,008 SF 100% Leased $26.75 NNN $14.58 Op/Ex $41.33 Gross
51,534 SF 37,883 SF
4
37,883 SF
3
27,276 SF
NSW
43
4
4
5
5
4
11,874 SF
4
3
3
3
50,798 SF
3
2
7,704 SF
2
2
2
50,798 SF
2
1
7,878 SF
1
1
1
21,896 SF
1
NSW
Rollingwood Center I 2500 Bee Caves Rd
Rollingwood Center II 2500 Bee Caves Rd
4 Floors 145,437 SF 100% Leased $29.00 NNN $12.00 Op/Ex $41.00 Gross
2 Floors 69,150 SF 89% Leased $29.00 NNN $12.00 Op/Ex $41.00 Gross
FSW
3600 San Clemente B 3600 N Capital of Tx Hwy 3 Floors 90,267 Sf 100% Leased $26.50 NNN $15.63 Op/Ex $42.13 Gross
FSW
3700 San Clemente 3700 N Capital of Tx Hwy 5 Floors 249,870 SF 79% Leased $29.50 NNN $13.27 Op/Ex $42.77 Gross
FSW
3900 San Clemente 3900 N Capital of Tx Hwy 5 Floors 251,146 SF 46% Leased $25.00 NNN $13.81 Op/Ex $38.81 Gross
52,939 SF
FSW
The Summit at Lantana Bldg 300 7171 Southwest Pkwy 4 Floors 217,077 SF 76% Leased $24.00 NNN $13.06 Op/Ex $37.06 Gross
Southwest Submark
7 6
4
3
4 15,796 SF
2
1
5,639 SF
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
2,429 SF
3
3
3
3
2
4,901 SF
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
NSW
NSW
NSW
FSW
FSW
FSW
Two Barton Skyway 1601 S Mopac Expy
Three Barton Skyway 1221 S Mopac Expy
Four Barton Skyway 1301 S Mopac Expy
Capital Ridge 320 Capital of Tx Hwy
Dimensional Place 1 6304 Bee Caves Rd
Dimensional Place 2 6300 Bee Caves Rd
4 Floors 195,639 SF 89% Leased $25.50 - $26.00 NNN $13.79 Op/Ex $39.29 - $39.79 Gross
4 Floors 173,302 SF 96% Leased $25.50 - $26.00 NNN $13.70 Op/Ex $39.20 - $39.70 Gross
5 Floors 222,580 SF 100% Leased $25.50 - $26.00 NNN $12.86 Op/Ex $38.36 - $38.86 Gross
7 floors 216,511 SF 100% Leased $27.00 - $30.00 NNN $10.56 Op/Ex $37.56 - $40.56 Gross
7 Floors 220,000 SF 100% Leased $24.00 NNN $12.42 Op/Ex $36.42 Gross
5 Floors 156,000 SF 100% Leased $24.00 NNN $12.42 Op/Ex $36.42 Gross
5
21,265 SF
5
4
21,262 SF
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
20,228 SF
2
1
1
1
18,762 SF
1
NSW
NSW
Mira Vista 2705 Bee Caves Rd
NSW
The Park on Barton Creek One 3711 S Mopac Expy 5 floors 102,608 SF 100% Leased $24.50 NNN $13.33 Op/Ex $37.83 Gross
3 Floors 121,147 SF 100% Leased $27.50 NNN $14.02 Op/Ex $41.52 Gross
5
3
FSW
5,725 SF
6
9,716 SF
5
2,974 SF
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
2,559 SF
2
2
1
1
2,042 SF
1
1
NSW
FSW
Plaza on the Lake II 4801 Plaza on the Lake Dr. 3 Floors 111,166 SF 100% Leased $26.50 NNN $14.96 Op/Ex $41.85 Gross
2,052 SF
3 2 4,356 SF
NSW
1
NSW
The Terrace I 2600 Via Fortuna
The Terrace II 2700 Via Fortuna
The Terrace VI 2901 Via Fortuna
The Terrace VII 2801 Via Fortuna
5 Floors 115,460 SF 89% Leased $24.50 NNN $15.99 Op/Ex $40.49 Gross
5 Floors 114,635 SF 100% Leased $24.50 NNN $15.65 Op/Ex $40.15 Gross
6 Floors 197,909 SF 88% Leased $27.50 - $28.00 NNN $15.92 Op/Ex $43.42 - $43.92 Gross
6 Floors 192,214 SF 99% Leased $27.50 - $28.00 NNN $15.99 Op/Ex $43.49 - $43.99 Gross
AUSTIN, TX Q4 2015 CLASS A AVAILABILITY SUMMARY
2 1
Plaza on the Lake I 5001 Plaza on the Lake Dr. 3 Floors 122,530 SF 93% Leased $26.50 NNN $15.35 Op/Ex $41.85 Gross
5
6,354 SF
3 8,936 SF
1
6
3
ket
3,406 SF
5
4
The Summit at Lantana Bldg 400 7171 Southwest Pkwy 4 Floors 220,218 SF 100% Leased $24.00 NNN $13.06 Op/Ex $37.06 Gross
2
5000 Plaza on the Lake 5000 Plaza on the Lake Dr. 3 Floors 118,063 SF 100% Leased $26.75 NNN $15.57 Op/Ex $42.32 Gross
3
NSW
3
FSW
The Park on Barton Creek Two 3711 S Mopac Expy 5 floors 102,587 SF 62% Leased $24.50 NNN $13.33 Op/Ex $37.83 Gross
4
FSW
9,980 SF
SUBLEASE SPACE AVAILABLE SPACE
44
TheAppendix Long Term Performance of Submarkets
47
Long Term Performance: CBD vs. Suburban
48
Central Business District Competitive Set Performance
49
Competitive Set Buildings
50
Northwest Submarket Competitive Set Performance
51
Micromarket Performance
52
Competitive Set Buildings by Micromarket
55
Southwest Submarket Competitive Set Performance
58
Micromarket Performance
59
Competitive Set Buildings by Micromarket
61
University Park Conference Room; Photo by Third Eye Photography
LONG TERM PERFORMANCE OF SUBMARKETS Numbers based on CBRE statistics.
8
20%
6
15%
4
10%
2
5%
0
0%
Citywide Sublease Availability
5
40%
4
32%
3
24%
2
16%
1
8%
0
0%
Northwest Direct Availability
Northwest Sublease Availability
Northwest Vacancy Rate
Citywide Vacancy Rate
CITYWIDE AVERAGE CLASS A ASKING RATES
$45 Full Service Rental Rate
1,500
18%
1,000
12%
$40 $35 $30 $25 $20
CBD
Northwest
Southwest
500
6%
0
0%
Citywide
CBD Direct Availability
CBD Sublease Availability
CBD Vacancy Rate
Citywide Vacancy Rate
SOUTHWEST AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE 2,500
30%
2,000
24%
1,500
18%
1,000
12%
500
6%
0
0%
Southwest Direct Availability
Southwest Sublease Availability
Southwest Vacancy Rate
Citywide Vacancy Rate
ABSORPTION & OCCUPANCY RATE *Absorption includes sublease space. Year Over Year Direct & Sublease Absorption (Millions of SF)
$50
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Availability (Millions of SF)
NORTHWEST AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
47
24%
Citywide Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
Citywide Direct Availability
2,000
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
25%
30%
4
95%
3
90%
2
85%
1
80%
0
75%
-1
70%
-2
65%
CBD
Northwest
Southwest
Citywide Occupancy Rate
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
10
2,500
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
30% Availability (Thousands of SF)
12
CBD AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Availability (Millions of SF)
CITYWIDE AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
LONG TERM PERFORMANCE CBD VS. SUBURBAN Numbers based on CBRE statistics.
AVERAGE CLASS A ASKING RATES
DIRECT & SUBLEASE VACANCY RATES
$50
30% 25%
Vacancy Rate
Full Service Rental Rate
$40
$30
$20
$10
15% 10% 5%
$0
0%
Suburban
CBD Vacancy Rate
Citywide
DIRECT & SUBLEASE AVAILABILITY 30%
10
25%
8
20%
6
15%
4
10%
2
5%
0
0%
Suburban
Citywide Vacancy Rate
Citywide Vacancy Rate
4 Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
12
CBD
Suburban Vacancy Rate
SF UNDER CONSTRUCTION Area Under Construction (Millions of SF)
CBD
Direct & Sublease Availability (Millions of SF)
20%
3
2
1
0
CBD
Northwest
Southwest
48
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT COMPETITIVE SET PERFORMANCE CBD COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
5,637,136
2014 Q2
5,637,136
618,961
4,210
86,100
11.05%
$44.03
576,465
25,189
21,517
10.67%
$44.81
2014 Q3 2014 Q4
5,827,916
483,868
81,356
227,210
9.70%
$45.13
5,827,916
503,540
69,160
(7,476)
9.83%
$46.49
2015 Q1
6,344,401
421,858
55,200
612,127
7.52%
$47.28
2015 Q2
6,466,952
479,092
40,409
80,108
8.03%
$47.74
2015 Q3
6,466,952
370,193
38,822
110,486
6.32%
$48.70
2015 Q4
6,471,834
237,718
55,748
120,431
4.53%
$52.03
*Absorption includes sublease space
16%
600
12%
400
8%
200
4%
0
2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Direct Available SF Sublease Available SF
0% 2015 2015 2015 Q2 Q3 Q4 Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$53
14%
$51
12%
$49
10%
$47
8%
$45
6%
$43
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
49
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
4%
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES
700
96%
600
95%
500
94%
400
93%
300
92%
200
91%
100
90%
0 (100)
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
89% 88%
Occupancy Rate
800
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
CBD COMPETITIVE SET BUILDINGS Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
100 Congress
411,536
20,182 ↓
2,177 ↑
$37.00
$20.84 ↑
300 West 6th
454,225
1,421
0↓
$36.00
$21.75 ↑
301 Congress
418,338
17,934 ↓
0
$35.00 ↑
$17.95
400 West 15th
281,196
8,627
21,224 ↑
$24.50
$15.92
501 Congress
122,551
18,922
0
$32.00
$21.27 ↑
515 Congress
263,058
7,568 ↓
4,415 ↑
$32.00
$18.05 ↑
600 Congress Ave.
503,951
13,187 ↓
0
$33.00
$15.80
816 Congress
434,081
24,118 ↑
0
$29.00
$17.59 ↑
Austin Centre
326,335
14,471 ↓
10,874 ↑
$28.00
$17.65 ↑
Capitol Center
164,044
7,920 ↓
7,245 ↑
$28.00
$19.51 ↑
Capitol Tower
172,837
0
0
$29.00
$16.52 ↑
Chase Tower
389,503
16,711
0
$31.00
$19.84 ↑
Colorado Tower
373,334
0
0
$34.00
$16.83 ↑
Frost Bank Tower
535,078
0↓
0
$38.00
$21.75 ↑
IBC Bank Plaza
194,749
0
4,900 ↑
$30.00
$21.00 ↑
Lavaca Plaza
118,635
0
0
$32.50 ↑
$21.74 ↑
Littlefield Building
109,779
30,424
1,800 ↑
$29.00
$15.96 ↑
One Congress Plaza
518,385
44,055 ↓
3,113 ↑
$40.00 ↑
$17.77 ↑
San Jacinto Center
406,279
0↓
0
$40.00 ↑
$18.75 ↑
Scarbrough Building
130,789
12,178
0
$32.00 ↑
$17.96 ↑
Seaholm
143,151
0
0
$28.00
$12.00
Building Name
50
NORTHWEST SUBMARKET COMPETITIVE SET PERFORMANCE NORTHWEST COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
12,293,184
1,050,027
135,810
2014 Q2
12,242,690
1,030,332
246,257
56,257
9.65%
$31.21
(141,246)
10.43%
$31.61
2014 Q3
12,389,252
911,833
321,739
2014 Q4
12,845,611
1,197,426
320,587
189,579
9.96%
$32.12
171,918
11.82%
$32.93
2015 Q1
12,931,909
992,203
292,334
319,774
9.93%
$33.39
2015 Q2
13,120,924
2015 Q3
13,310,232
897,208
284,035
292,309
9.00%
$33.83
1,129,335
287,248
(46,032)
10.64%
$33.55
2015 Q4
13,831,583
1,135,749
235,206
566,979
9.91%
$34.30
Net Absorption*
*Absorption includes sublease space
16%
1,200
12%
800
8%
400
0
4%
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
$34
13%
$33
11%
$32
9%
$31
7%
$30
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
51
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
5%
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES 15%
92%
600
91%
400
90%
200
89%
0
88%
(200)
0%
$35
800
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
87%
Occupancy Rate
1,600
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
ARBORETUM/DOMAIN MICROMARKET PERFORMANCE ARBORETUM/DOMAIN COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
6,106,452
433,079
55,206
(18,356)
8.00%
$32.55
2014 Q2
6,106,452
476,360
109,332
(97,407)
9.59%
$33.04
2014 Q3
6,253,014
401,651
157,535
173,068
8.94%
$33.66
2014 Q4
6,474,987
445,544
121,157
214,458
8.75%
$34.38
2015 Q1
6,553,774
447,850
71,595
126,043
7.93%
$34.46
2015 Q2
6,742,789
389,248
63,891
255,321
6.72%
$34.77
2015 Q3
6,719,697
407,169
76,078
(53,200)
7.19%
$34.38
2015 Q4
6,938,611
322,314
93,200
286,647
5.99%
$34.82
*Absorption includes sublease space
12%
600
9%
400
6%
200
3%
0
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
400
95%
300
93%
200
91%
100
89%
0
87%
(100)
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
800
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
85% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
$36
11%
$35
9%
$34
7%
$33
5%
$32
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES
3% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
52
SHEPHERD MOUNTAIN/2222 MICROMARKET PERFORMANCE SHEPHERD MOUNTAIN/2222 COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
2,453,857
276,447
2014 Q2
2,453,857
241,923
29,559
8,688
12.47%
$31.43
46,956
17,127
11.77%
$31.95
2014 Q3
2,453,857
2014 Q4
2,688,442
211,437
92,007
(14,565)
12.37%
$32.28
389,788
127,233
21,008
19.23%
$33.10
2015 Q1
2,690,750
207,238
179,538
132,553
14.37%
$34.17
2015 Q2
2,690,750
181,807
152,245
52,724
12.41%
$34.45
2015 Q3
2,690,750
193,874
135,899
4,279
12.26%
$34.55
2015 Q4
2,690,835
173,907
79,703
76,248
9.42%
$35.16
*Absorption includes sublease space
24%
525
18%
350
12%
175
6%
0 2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
16%
$32
8%
Rental Rate
$34
$30
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
53
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Vacancy Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES 24%
120
91%
80
87%
40
83%
0
79%
75% 2014 Q1
2015 Q4
$36
95%
(40)
0% 2014 Q1
160
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
Net Absorption*
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
700
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
FAR NORTHWEST MICROMARKET PERFORMANCE FAR NORTHWEST COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
3,732,875
340,501
51,045
65,925
10.49%
$28.88
2014 Q2
3,682,381
312,049
89,969
(60,966)
10.92%
$29.02
2014 Q3
3,682,381
298,745
72,197
31,076
10.07%
$29.40
2014 Q4
3,682,182
362,094
72,197
(63,548)
11.79%
$30.26
2015 Q1
3,687,385
337,115
41,201
61,178
10.26%
$30.93
2015 Q2
3,687,385
326,153
67,899
(15,736)
10.69%
$31.66
2015 Q3
3,899,785
528,292
75,271
2,889
15.48%
$31.42
2015 Q4
4,202,137
639,528
62,303
204,084
16.70%
$32.77
*Absorption includes sublease space
24%
600
18%
400
12%
200
6%
0 2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
96%
200
92%
100
88%
0
84%
(100)
0% 2014 Q1
300
80% 2014 Q1
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
800
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
$34
24%
$32
18%
$30
12%
$28
6%
$26
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
54
ARBORETUM/DOMAIN MICROMARKET COMPETITIVE SET BUILDINGS Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
3307 Northland
98,888
552 ↓
0
$17.50 ↑
$11.05 ↑
9500 Arboretum
182,331
0
18,319
$22.00
$13.00
Arboretum Atrium
90,280
2,515
0
$21.00
$14.38 ↑
Arboretum Plaza One
146,347
0
0
$27.00
$15.72 ↑
Arboretum Plaza Two
98,828
0
0
$27.00
$15.72 ↑
Arboretum Point
150,033
0
0
$23.00
$13.44
Atrium Office Centre
199,858
20,340 ↓
0
$17.50
$7.89
Austin Oaks
445,240
13,254
3,981
$18.00
$10.90
Balcones Centre
74,876
3,919
0
$24.00
$9.86
Braker Pointe I
77,454
15,370
0
$22.50 ↑
$13.16
Braker Pointe II
103,114
1,953
5,162 ↓
$22.50 ↑
$12.89
Braker Pointe III
196,380
0
0
$25.00
$12.84
Colina West
69,299
203 ↑
1,150 ↑
$21.00 ↑
$10.71
Domain 2
143,331
0
0
$29.00
$11.00
Domain 3
179,006
0
20,816
$25.50
$10.34
Domain 4
152,012
0
0
$24.00
$11.16
Domain 7
221,973
13,000 ↓
0
$28.00
$11.33
Domain Gateway
173,962
0
0
$21.00
$14.95
Great Hills Corporate Center I
59,228
3,601 ↑
0
$18.50 ↑
$11.52 ↑
Great Hills Corporate Center II
60,429
3,593 ↑
0
$18.50 ↑
$11.52 ↑
Great Hills Corporate Center III
56,422
8,164 ↓
0
$18.50 ↑
$11.52 ↑
Great Hills Plaza
139,252
19,458 ↑
0
$20.00
$12.93 ↑
Greystone Plaza
78,248
8,095 ↓
0
$18.00 ↑
$12.63
Heritage Plaza
74,736
11,798
0
$28.00
$11.29
Kaleido I & II
73,149
7,522 ↓
0
$16.50 ↑
$9.93 ↓
Lakeview Plaza
120,956
6,266
0
$20.00
$13.10 ↑
Northpoint Centre I & II
151,126
1,527 ↓
0
$22.00
$11.22
Offices at the Domain Bldg 1
92,955
7,428
0
$26.50
$15.49 ↑
Offices at the Domain Bldg 2
75,509
0
0
$26.50
$14.75 ↑
Building Name
55
One Far West Plaza
70,642
4,123 ↓
0
$18.00 ↑
$12.87 ↑
Park North I & II
133,568
8,696 ↑
0
$18.00
$11.83
Plaza 7000
155,076
17,983 ↓
0
$26.00 ↑
$13.82 ↑
Prominent Pointe I
150,376
28,979 ↑
0
$24.50
$13.65
Prominent Pointe II
102,567
0
0↓
$24.50
$14.70
Quarry Lake Business Center
117,512
5,048
0
$20.00
$13.75 ↑
Quarry Oaks I
165,435
7,155
0
$24.00
$11.82
Quarry Oaks II
126,000
0
0
$25.00
$11.48
Quarry Oaks III
137,615
0
11,814
N/A
TBD
Reunion Park
118,142
15,903 ↑
0
$19.00 ↓
$11.16
Stone Creek I
76,860
0
0
$22.00
$0.00
Stone Creek II
162,723
5,077 ↓
0
$22.00
$12.60
Stone Creek Park
77,185
0
0
$20.00
$13.45
Stonebridge Plaza I
193,200
3,794
0
$26.00
$14.97 ↑
Stonebridge Plaza II
192,864
10,898 ↑
0
$26.00
$15.04 ↑
Stratum Executive Center Bldg A
61,000
4,055 ↓
0↓
$21.00 ↑
$14.12 ↑
Stratum Executive Center Bldg B
61,000
0
0↓
$21.00 ↑
$14.12 ↑
Building Name
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
Stratum Executive Center Bldg C
61,000
6,175 ↓
0
$21.00 ↑
$14.12 ↑
Stratum Executive Center Bldg D
61,000
0
0
$21.00 ↑
$14.12 ↑
The Campus at Arboretum 1
60,059
2,733 ↓
0
$23.00 ↑
$14.13 ↑
The Campus at Arboretum 2
33,135
0↓
0
$23.00 ↑
$13.60 ↓
The Campus at Arboretum 3
32,765
0
0
$23.00 ↑
$14.53
The Campus at Arboretum 4
85,916
6,852 ↑
0
$23.00 ↑
$14.17
The Campus at Arboretum 5
105,000
0↓
0
$23.00 ↑
$13.94 ↓
The Park at 8300 N. MoPac
93,317
6,911
31,958 ↑
$23.00
$13.40
UFCU Plaza
246,869
28,695 ↑
0
$20.00
$12.15
Westech 360 Bldgs 1-4
175,529
8,579 ↓
0
$20.00
$13.60 ↑
Westpark Office 1-4
97,034
2,100 ↓
0
$18.50 ↓
$10.89 ↑
SHEPHERD MOUNTAIN/2222 MICROMARKET COMPETITIVE SET BUILDINGS Building Name
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
Bridgepoint Plaza I
105,333
0
0
$23.50
$12.81
Bridgepoint Plaza II
72,640
10,082 ↑
0
$23.50
$13.54 ↑
Bridgepoint Square 1
84,692
6,636
0
$23.00
$13.54 ↑
Bridgepoint Square 2
92,459
9,359 ↓
0
$23.75 ↑
$12.43
Bridgepoint Square 3
78,352
0
0
$23.75 ↑
$12.43
Bridgepoint Square 4
109,175
0
0
$23.75 ↑
$12.43
Bridgepoint Square 5
76,793
0
0
$23.75 ↑
$12.43
Champion Office Park I & II
230,000
0
0
$26.50
$11.00
Four Points Centre I & II
192,396
0
0
$23.50
$12.62
Ladera Bend 1
56,466
0
0
$21.50
$16.34
Ladera Bend 2
45,732
0↓
0
$21.50
$13.88
Ladera Bend 3
56,196
0
0↓
$21.50
$13.83
Lakewood Center I
47,389
0
45,020
$22.00
$13.20
Lakewood Center II
44,611
0
13,206
$22.00
$13.20
102,086
16,556 ↑
0
$19.50
$9.60
Lakewood on the Park C
78,596
12,808
0
$19.50
$11.80
Millennium Building
125,612
0
0
$24.00 ↑
$12.58 ↑
Park Centre Bldg 1
89,822
3,970 ↓
0
$18.00
$12.60 ↑
Park Centre Bldg 2
35,095
18,730
0
$18.00
$12.60 ↑
Park Centre Bldg 3
78,270
57,562
0
$18.00
$12.60 ↑
Reserve at Bull Creek A
43,867
6,694 ↓
0
$18.00
$12.28
Reserve at Bull Creek B
43,713
0
0
$20.00
$10.86
Reserve at Bull Creek C
43,695
0
0
$20.00
$11.44
Lakewood on the Park B
River Place Corporate Park I
76,529
0
0
$22.00 ↑
$12.79
River Place Corporate Park II
114,491
4,695 ↓
0
$22.00 ↑
$12.43
River Place Corporate Park III
113,465
4,339
0
$22.00 ↑
$12.50
River Place Corporate Park IV
87,639
10,538 ↑
0
$22.00 ↑
$13.53
River Place Corporate Park V
67,601
0↓
0
$22.00 ↑
$12.01
River Place Corporate Park VI
62,037
0
0
$22.00 ↑
$13.33
River Place Corporate Park VII
69,119
0
21,477
$22.00 ↑
$14.15
Shepherd Mountain Plaza
100,937
0
0
$33.00
$12.49 ↑
Stone Cliff
66,027
11,938
0
$18.00
$12.73 56
FAR NORTHWEST MICROMARKET COMPETITIVE SET BUILDINGS Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
Amber Oaks A
78,164
0
0↓
$19.50 ↑
$10.94
Amber Oaks B
44,184
0
0
$19.50 ↑
$8.30
Amber Oaks C
44,184
0
0
$19.50 ↑
$8.60
Amber Oaks D
28,733
0
0
$19.50 ↑
$10.45
Amber Oaks E
63,111
0
0
$19.50 ↑
$8.03
Amber Oaks F
78,034
79,732 ↑
0
$19.50 ↑
$10.09
Amber Oaks G
106,455
4,572 ↓
0↓
$19.50 ↑
$10.01
Amber Oaks H
101,045
0
0
$19.50 ↑
$10.93
Amber Oaks I
50,313
10,828
0
$19.50 ↑
$11.63
Building Name
Amber Oaks J
57
50,111
6,245
33,147
$19.50 ↑
$10.90
Aspen Lake One
204,940
0
0
$18.50
$13.26
Aspen Lake Two
129,000
0
0
$24.50
$10.00
Crossings at Lakeline I
114,726
4,078
10,445 ↑
$21.50
$10.98
Crossings at Lakeline II
118,046
10,652 ↑
2,189 ↑
$21.50
$11.10
Paloma Ridge A
106,200
106,200
0
$18.00
$9.50
Paloma Ridge B
106,200
106,200
0
$18.00
$9.50
Parmer Business Park 7, 8, 9
123,731
0
0
$18.50
$5.60
Parmer Business Park D, E, F
107,283
0
0
$18.50
$5.60
Pecan Park I
136,444
0
0
$21.50
$10.72
Pecan Park II
136,245
0
0
$19.50
$9.45
Research Park Place 7
125,701
3,790
0
$22.00
$11.55
Research Park Place 8
125,700
33,518
0
$22.00
$11.55
Research Park Plaza I
136,068
11,747
0
$23.00 ↑
$14.98 ↑
Research Park Plaza II
135,813
0
0
$23.00 ↑
$14.98 ↑
Research Park Plaza III
173,530
0
0
$23.00
$13.08
Research Park Plaza IV
184,114
11,342
0
$23.00
$13.08
Research Park Plaza V
172,854
121,229
0
$24.00
$11.06
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 2
63,372
7,054 ↓
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 3
63,849
0
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 4
93,737
93,737
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 5
93,828
23,783
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 6
93,835
0
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 7
92,719
0
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 8
93,718
0
16,522
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Corporate Park Bldg 9
92,973
0
0
$22.00
$13.30 ↑
Riata Crossing Bldg 1
81,775
0
0
N/A
N/A
Riata Crossing Bldg 2
114,906
0
0
N/A
N/A
Riata Crossing Bldg 3
81,229
0
0
N/A
N/A
Riata Crossing Bldg 4
79,465
0
0
N/A
N/A
Tower of the Hills/Tower Point
175,802
4,821 ↓
0
$25.00 ↑
$12.85 ↑
SOUTHWEST COMPETITIVE SET PERFORMANCE SOUTHWEST COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
7,102,874
480,177
202,095
(37,795)
9.61%
$34.71
2014 Q2
7,102,874
387,913
208,978
85,381
8.40%
$35.06
2014 Q3
7,102,874
294,587
169,604
132,700
6.54%
$35.47
2014 Q4
7,102,547
386,333
182,477
(104,946)
8.01%
$36.07
2015 Q1
7,100,750
399,919
188,613
(21,519)
8.29%
$36.98
2015 Q2
7,782,464
428,605
213,812
627,829
8.25%
$37.55
2015 Q3
7,949,325
353,625
264,345
191,308
7.77%
$37.61
2015 Q4
8,158,872
634,326
246,492
(53,301)
10.80%
$38.15
*Absorption includes sublease space
15%
800
95%
800
12%
600
93%
600
9%
400
91%
400
6%
200
89%
200
3%
0
87%
0
(200)
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
1,000
85% 2014 Q1
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
$40
12%
$38
10%
$36
8%
$34
6%
$32
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES
4% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
58
NEAR SOUTHWEST MICROMARKET PERFORMANCE NEAR SOUTHWEST COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
2,712,851
209,356
143,888
(89,075)
13.02%
$37.18
2014 Q2
2,712,851
191,624
165,931
(4,311)
13.18%
$37.40
2014 Q3
2,712,851
174,207
126,557
56,791
11.09%
$37.59
2014 Q4
2,713,137
158,703
124,248
18,099
10.43%
$38.03
2015 Q1
2,711,340
143,863
125,110
12,181
9.92%
$39.26
2015 Q2
2,925,937
110,815
101,710
271,045
7.26%
$39.49
2015 Q3
2,925,937
105,532
175,528
(68,535)
9.61%
$39.84
2015 Q4
2,925,937
149,170
165,733
(33,843)
10.76%
$40.59
*Absorption includes sublease space
16%
300
12%
200
8%
100
4%
0
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
18%
$41
15%
$39
12%
$37
9%
6% 2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
59
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
$43
2014 Q2
200
96%
100
92%
0
88%
84% 2014 Q1
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES
2014 Q1
100%
(100)
2015 Q4
$35
300
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
400
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
FAR SOUTHWEST MICROMARKET PERFORMANCE FAR SOUTHWEST COMPETITIVE SET Quarter
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Net Absorption*
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2014 Q1
4,390,023
270,821
58,207
51,280
7.49%
$33.19
2014 Q2
4,390,023
196,289
43,047
89,692
5.45%
$33.62
2014 Q3
4,390,023
120,380
43,047
75,909
3.72%
$34.16
2014 Q4
4,389,410
227,630
58,229
(123,045)
6.51%
$34.86
2015 Q1
4,389,410
256,056
63,503
(33,700)
7.28%
$35.57
2015 Q2
4,856,527
317,790
112,102
356,784
8.85%
$36.39
2015 Q3
5,023,388
248,093
88,817
259,843
6.71%
$36.31
2015 Q4
5,232,935
485,156
80,759
(19,458)
10.81%
$36.75
*Absorption includes sublease space
12%
450
9%
300
6%
150
3%
0
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
Direct Available SF
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
Sublease Available SF
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
450
100%
300
97%
150
94%
0
91%
(150)
2015 Q4
88% 2014 Q1
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
Occupancy Rate
600
Absorption (Thousands of SF)
NET ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate
Availability (Thousands of SF)
AVAILABLE SF VS. VACANCY RATE
2014 Q2
Net Absorption*
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Occupancy Rate
$38
16%
$36
12%
$34
8%
$32
4%
$30
Vacancy Rate
Rental Rate
VACANCY VS. RENTAL RATES
0% 2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
Average Class A Full Service Rental Rate
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
Direct & Sublease Vacancy Rate
60
NEAR SOUTHWEST MICROMARKET COMPETITIVE SET BUILDINGS Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
Barton Creek Plaza I
72,974
9,617 ↓
0
$23.00 ↑
$13.65 ↑
Barton Creek Plaza II
64,718
0↓
0
$23.00
$11.69
Barton Creek Plaza III
64,842
0↓
0
$23.00
$11.83
Barton Oaks Plaza I
99,404
4,901 ↓
0
$27.00
$15.98 ↑
Barton Oaks Plaza II
116,368
11,073
0
$26.50 ↑
$15.56 ↑
Barton Oaks Plaza III
121,467
7,237
0
$26.50 ↑
$14.59 ↑
Barton Oaks Plaza IV
112,000
0
0
$41.00 ↑
$14.73 ↑
Barton Oaks Plaza V
119,549
6,026 ↑
0↓
$26.00
$14.47 ↑
Barton Skyway I
195,324
3,596 ↑
3,596 ↑
$26.00 ↑
$13.40
Barton Skyway II
195,639
21,435 ↑
0
$26.00 ↑
$13.79
Barton Skyway III
173,302
7,330 ↑
4,901 ↑
$26.00 ↑
$13.70
Barton Skyway IV
222,580
0
0
$26.00 ↑
$12.86
Centre I
39,903
0
0
$21.00
$12.50
Centre II
54,610
0
0
$19.50
$11.82
Mira Vista
121,147
0
0
$27.50 ↑
$14.02 ↓
Overlook at Gaines Ranch
50,725
0
0
$26.50
$14.17
Rollingwood Center I & II
214,587
7,878
110,108 ↑
$29.00
$12.00
Spyglass Point
58,576
0
0
$22.00 ↑
$13.45
The Park on Barton Creek 1
102,608
0
42,527
$24.50
$13.33
The Park on Barton Creek 2
102,587
38,900 ↑
0
$24.50
$13.33
The Terrace 1
115,460
6,354
4,601 ↑
$24.50 ↑
$15.99 ↑
The Terrace 2
114,635
0
0
$24.50 ↑
$15.65 ↑
The Terrace 6
196,717
22,771
0
$28.00 ↑
$15.92 ↑
The Terrace 7
196,215
2,052 ↑
0↓
$28.00 ↑
$15.99 ↑
Building Name
61
FAR SOUTHWEST MICROMARKET COMPETITIVE SET BUILDINGS Building Name
Net Rentable Area
Direct Available SF
Sublease Available SF
Asking Rental Rate
Estimated OpEx
3600 San Clemente Bldg B
90,267
0
0
$26.50
$15.63 ↑
3700 San Clemente
249,870
51,934
0
$29.50
$13.27 ↑
3900 San Clemente
251,146
135,366 ↑
0
$25.00
$13.81 ↓
5000 Plaza on the Lake
118,063
0↓
13,388 ↑
$26.75 ↑
$15.57 ↑
7000 West at Lantana 1 & 2
136,075
0
0
DND
$13.14 ↑
Canyon at Wild Basin
74,580
8,034 ↓
0↓
$24.00
$11.60
Capital Ridge
216,511
0
0
$30.00
$10.56
Cielo Center
270,711
0↓
1,320 ↓
$19.50
$12.55
CityView 1
46,702
0
0
$21.00 ↑
$13.55 ↑
CityView 2
47,809
922 ↑
0
$21.00 ↑
$13.55 ↑
CityView 3
48,044
0↓
2,015 ↑
$21.00 ↑
$13.55 ↑
CityView Center
137,763
0
24,478
$26.00 ↑
$11.79
Crystal Mountain 1, 2 & 3
61,762
11,322 ↑
0↓
$26.00 ↑
$9.41
Dimensional Place I
220,000
0
0
$24.00
$12.42
Dimensional Place II
156,000
0
0
$24.00
$12.42
Encino Trace I
161,606
0
0
$23.50
$11.00
Encino Trace II
158,137
130,070
0
$23.50
$11.00
Escalade Bldg A
56,701
9,440
0
$19.50
$13.46 ↑
Escalade Bldg B
56,701
2,083
0
$19.50
$13.46 ↑
Lake Pointe II
42,933
5,489 ↑
0
$24.00
$8.42
Las Cimas I
85,000
6,726 ↑
0
$24.50
$14.29 ↑
Las Cimas II
156,069
0↓
0
$26.00
$13.83
Las Cimas III
157,418
7,048 ↑
0↓
$26.00
$13.93
Las Cimas IV
138,008
0↓
1,590
$26.75 ↑
$14.58 ↑
Lost Creek Point
73,026
6,800 ↑
0
$18.00
$12.29 ↓
Parkway at Oak Hill I & II
145,475
23,644 ↑
0
$24.00 ↑
$13.07
Plaza 290
63,163
1,633 ↓
0↓
$18.50 ↑
$12.50 ↑
Plaza on the Lake I
122,530
8,936
0
$26.50
$15.35 ↑
Plaza on the Lake II
111,166
0
0
$26.50
$14.96
Rialto I
77,872
2,213 ↓
0
$23.00
$13.64 ↑
Rialto II
77,508
1,588
36,421
$23.00
$13.64 ↑
The Enclave Bldgs 1-4
44,704
0
0
$17.00
$8.37
The Summit at Lantana Bldgs 1-5
865,832
52,939
0
$24.00 ↓
$13.06 ↑
Travis Oaks
123,434
5,078 ↓
0↓
$23.50 ↑
$13.30 ↑
Vista Ridge I
75,131
2,199 ↓
0
$19.00 ↑
$11.33
Westlake Place
61,184
8,836
1,547 ↑
$20.00 ↑
$12.98 ↑
Wild Basin Atrium Bldg A & B
118,910
0
0
$17.00
$9.31
Wild Basin I
60,498
2,856 ↑
0
$19.00
$11.81 ↑
Wild Basin II
74,626
0
0
$19.00
$10.87 ↓
62
YOUR
NOTES:
63
64
1717 W. SIXTH STREET, SUITE 400 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 512.684.3800 AQUILACOMMERCIAL.COM
1
Stevie Ray Vaughn Statue; Photo by: Katie Haugland