The War on California’s “Mom and Pop” Housing Providers

BY RODERICK WRIGHT CALIFORNIA STATE SENATOR (RET.)

Consider the story of the Norman Johnson family, a 70+ year-old retired probation officer and his wife. He retired from Los Angeles County as a supervisor after over 40 years on the job. He married his college sweetheart, who became a school teacher, and later promoted to elementary school principal before she retired. The Johnsons have two grown children, who have moved out of the house and live happy lives.

The Johnsons initially lived in a small apartment when they first married. Their plan was to save up for a down payment in order to buy a house. They drove a modest car, and kept their other expenses down. Their friends often teased them about being cheap. They wore simple clothes and made frugal financial choices.

After three years, the Johnsons had saved enough to begin considering the purchase of a single-family home. However, they choose instead to purchase a duplex which after taking into consideration the rental income and tax deductions, they had a lower monthly out of pocket cost than they had living in their old apartment. After purchasing the duplex, they continued saving and after five years had saved enough to make a second real estate purchase.

This time the Johnsons decided to purchase a four-unit apartment building, which qualified under the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) finance regulations. So, in a period of just eight years, the Johnsons owned a total of six units with positive cash flow. In 1978, the State of California passed Proposition 13, which lowered property taxes, but exposed the Johnsons to more income taxes. So, they decided to purchase a home with the additional income and rent out their unit in the duplex, giving them both more income and tax deductions.

At that point, the Johnsons had officially become “mom and pop” rental property owners. Now the effects of the Wall Street war on property owners was beginning to take effect. In the late 1970’s Wall Street began its assault on the real estate market, particularly, the rental housing business. Their goal was to shift investments from rental property into 401(k) type investments. One of their first salvos was the elimination of accelerated depreciation on rental property. By extending the time period for depreciation, rental property owners lost valuable tax deductions. This cost the Johnsons thousands of dollars per year.

Without much fanfare, the government then eliminated the tax deductions for owning more than two properties. So, once again, this change in the tax code cost the Johnsons thousands of dollars as they lost the deduction for their third property.

Then, the City of Los Angeles along with other cities enacted rent regulations in an attempt to “stabilize” rents and protect tenants from increasing rents while private housing investment had started to decline, due in part to the Wall Street’s manipulation. Now, at this point, we had begun seeing housing shortages and homelessness. Rent regulations such as rent control created new costs and limited incomes, so again the Johnsons lost thousands of dollars. Most members of the public don’t understand, or care about these losses incurred by rental property owners, particularly when it comes to the “moms and pops.”

The Johnsons have made investments in real estate and other areas as

Serving multi-family owners since 1983 Apartment Financing

• 2–4 units • 5+ units

“Depend on us” Nick Lieberman Owner/President AAOC Board Member Author, Pulse on the Marketplace

nlieberman@cox.net www.bonafidemortgage.com

part of planning for their retirement. Many “mom and pop” rental owners actually purchased their property to supplement to their retirements. These owners have retired and depend on the rental income generated by these investments to survive and pay for things such as food, medical care and even their own housing costs. Now many of the “moms and pops” are considering selling their property because they are no longer realizing the cash flow they had planned for in their retirement years. Moreover, the new, very complicated tenant’s rights and protection laws are proving more than the average independent rental property owner can handle without professional help and a great deal of additional cost.

The current system of rental housing has become highly unbalanced and it is unfair to owners, particularly smaller owners. When the government can enact eviction moratoriums, and tenants don’t have to pay rent despite owners still having to pay the taxes, mortgages, insurance and maintenance and other costs that continue unabated, this situation is just terribly wrong.

If that’s not enough, there is a movement afoot to provide free attorneys for tenants in unlawful detainer (eviction) court that is paid for by all of us taxpayers. There should a similar service for “mom and pop” property owners because many of them too are of limited financial means. The current onesided legal system is totally unfair to property owners, particularly small owners. Even before the eviction moratoriums, the cost of evicting a tenant could easily run an owner over $30,000 and take many months to adjudicate! We should create an arbitration system where both sides are represented by an arbitrator, as opposed to one-sided legal help.

Given that the government doesn’t seem to believe small rental property owners are in business, the government should offer buy their properties at market rate, and the sellers should not be required to pay capital gains taxes. This is what we do when property is taken by eminent domain. Then they could allow tenants to remain in units for whatever rent they can afford to pay. Los Angeles is losing nearly 6 units of rent controlled housing every day due to this Wall Street manipulation and one-sided regulatory environment.

Currently the Johnsons are owed over $85,000 dollars and counting because two of their tenants have not paid any rent for some time. With the moratorium in the City of Los Angeles still in place, they can’t evict these nonpaying tenants and because the tenants didn’t have real losses, they wouldn’t sign the rent assistance forms which required them to declare they had lost income due to COVID-19, which they had not. Moreover, the law forbids the Johnsons from inquiring about their

Mom and Pop — continued on page 20

1. Publication Title: Orange County Multihousing Service Corporation/

Orange County/Apartment News 2. Publication No: 410000 3. Filing Date: 09/26/2022 4. Issue Frequency: Monthly 5. No. of Issues Published Annually: 12 6. Annual Subscription Price: $25.00 7. Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication: 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Suite 125, Santa Ana, Orange County,

California 92701-5076. Contact Person: David Cordero,

Telephone: 714-245-9500 8. Complete Mailing Address of the Headquarters of General Business

Offices of the Publisher: 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Suite 125, Santa

Ana, CA 92701-5076 9. Full Names and Complete Mailing Addresses of Publisher, Editor, and Managing Editor: Publisher: Orange County Multi-Housing

Service Corporation, 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Suite 125, Santa Ana, CA 92701-5076. Editor: David Cordero. Managing Editor: David Cordero, 525 Cabrillo Park Drive, Suite 125, Santa Ana, CA 92701-5076 10. Owner (If owned by a corporation, its name and address must be stated and also immediately there under the names and addresses of stockholders owning or holding 1 percent or more of total amount of stock. If not owned by a corporation, the names and addresses of the individual owners must be given. If owned by a partnership or other unincorporated firm, its name and address as well as that of each individual must be given. If the publication is published by a nonprofit organization, its name and address must be stated.) Orange

County Multi-Housing Service Corporation, 525 Cabrillo Park Drive,

Suite 125, Santa Ana, CA 92701-5076. 11. Known Bondholders, Mortgages and Other Security Holders Owning or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount of Bonds, Mortgages, or Other Securities: None. 13. Publication Title: Orange County Apartment News. 14. Issue Date for Circulation Data Below: 09/26/2022 15. Extent and Avg. No. Copies Single Issue

Nature of Each Issue Nearest to

Circulation Preceding 12 Mo. Filing Date a. Total No. Copies (Net press run) 2045 1959 b. Paid and/or Requested Circulation: (1) Paid/Requested Outside County Mail Subscriptions 473 437 (2) Paid In-County Subscriptions 1572 1522 (3) Sales Through Dealers & Carriers, Street Vendors, Counter Sales and Other NonUSPS Paid Distribution 0 0 (4) Other Classes Mailed Through USPS 0 0 c. Total Paid and/or Requested Circulation 2045 1959 d. Free Distribution by Mail (1) Outside County 0 0 (2) Inside County 0 0 (3) Other Classes Mailed Through USPS 0 0 e. Free Distribution Outside the Mail 0 0 f. Total Free Distribution 0 0 g. Total Distribution 2045 1959 h. Copies Not Distributed 0 0 i. Total 2045 1959 j. Percent Paid and/or Requested Circulation 100.00% 100.00% 16. Published Issue Date 10/1/2022 I certify that the statements made by me above are correct and complete. s/DAVID CORDERO

tenant’s financial condition and obtaining proof of their alleged COVID-19 impacts. So, the Johnsons also lost out of state rent relief funds under the Housing is Key program. Nevertheless, as you might expect, the Johnsons are still responsible for ALL the expenses for the property including the taxes and maintenance on the building!

The Johnsons are seriously considering selling their properties to one of the real estate investment trusts (REIT) or private equity firms. Some owners are actually selling their property and carrying back the paper to avoid taxes. Rental property owners have been vilified by government and the political process. The reality is the government is being unwittingly manipulated by the Wall Street folks. Soon homeownership will be a thing of the past. Real Estate was once considered a sound investment. Changes in tax policy and the burden of student loans have driven it down as a good investment for the small investor. Families like the Johnsons have been the clear losers in all of this.

Both progressives and conservatives fall short on housing issues. What were the programs that worked before? We created opportunities for regular people to invest in housing. Apart from FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC, we wrote tax laws to encourage private investment, creating wealth on a broad spectrum. Now we see a widening of the wealth gap.

The last 40 years have been a direct assault on rental property owners, more particularly the “mom and pop” rental property owners like the Johnsons. This assault has come from all levels of government, local, state and federal, manipulated by Wall Street. In order to repair the private housing marketplace, it will take changes at these same levels.

This war on rental property owners by Wall Street is in part responsible for the housing shortage we see across America today. Real estate was once considered a way of achieving generational wealth. Soon we will revert to the old feudal system where the wealthy, Wall Street, own all the land, and as a result, they will become the landlords while the rest of us become Serfs, the tenants. May God help us?

About the Author: Roderick Wright is a retired member of the California Legislature, having represented the 35th Senate district from 2012-2014, the 25th Senate district from 2008 until 2012, and the 48th Assembly district from 1996 until he was term limited in 2002. Prior to holding elected office, Wright served as the District Director for Congresswoman Maxine Waters, was involved in the development of affordable housing with the Inner-City Housing Corporation, worked in the Planning Department at the City of Los Angeles, and worked at the Southern California Association of Governments. Mr. Wright is an author, speaker, and has been a rental property owner for over 40 years. He is a member of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles and the Coalition of Small Rental Property Owners.

Must present card at time of estimate Ask about our Senior & Millitary Discounts

• 4-Point Roof Inspection • Re-Roof • Repair Roofing • New Roof • Roof Certifications • Free Estimates • Roofing Specialist • All Phone Calls Returned the Same Day • Competitive Pricing • Quality Craftmanship • Neat, Clean, Professional