
14 minute read
RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROCESSES
Risk management is not a stand-alone discipline. In order to maximise risk management benefits and opportunities, it needs to be integrated with related existing business processes. Some of the key business processes with which risk alignment is necessary are:
• Internal Audit – Group Internal Audit reviews the effectiveness of controls. Alignment between the Internal Audit function and that of the controls within the Risk Management process is critical.
• Business Planning (including budget) – Identifying risk during the business planning process allows the Group to set realistic delivery timelines for strategies/ activities or to choose to remove a strategy/ activity if the associated risks are too high or unmanageable. The impact of changing risk levels over the year can then be mapped to the relevant objective, enabling the Group to conduct more timely feedback with key stakeholders.
• Performance Management - All risk responsibilities, whether a general responsibility to use the risk management process or specific responsibilities such as risk ownership or implementation of risk treatments should be included within the relevant individuals’ performance plans.

Key Process Steps
Risk management is a continual process that involves the following key steps:
• Communicate and consult
• Establish the context
• Identify risks
• Analyse risks
• Evaluate risks
• Treat risks
• Monitor, surveil and review. Following this approach ensures that risk management is both comprehensive and consistent. This process should be conducted across the entire organisation on a continuous basis or as the rating of the risks identified warrants (e.g. Very High and High rated risks). This occurs in conjunction with the corporate and business planning process and involves the review and update of risk profiles for the enterprise as a whole and also includes a review for each individual division. This illustrates a “top-down” and a ”bottom-up” approach to risk management. Risk Management should be occurring at all times and in relation to all business activities. Therefore, everyone has a responsibility to continually apply this process when making business decisions and when conducting day-to-day management.
To assist you in completing the risk management process, each process step is described in further detail.
Communication and consultation with internal and external stakeholders is important throughout the risk management process to ensure the organization has a comprehensive picture of the risks we face.
External communication and consultation is targeted at informing external stakeholders of:
• The organisation’s risk management approach.
• The effectiveness of our risk management approach.
• Requesting feedback where appropriate.
Risk management is a key governance and management function, which external stakeholders, including Government and industry, are paying increased attention to. Satisfying these stakeholders that appropriate risk management practices are used will influence their perception of the organisation.
Internal communication and consultation is aimed at informing internal stakeholders of:
• The risk management process.
• Seeking feedback in relation to the process.
• Key risks and their responsibilities relating to management of these.
This involves:
A.THE EXTERNAL CONTEXT
Building an understanding of our external stakeholders and as such the extent to which this external environment will impact on the Group’s ability to achieve corporate objectives:
• Business, Social, Regulatory, Cultural, Competitive, Financial and Political Environments in which the Group operates
• Key drivers and trends
• It also involves considering strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
• Stakeholder interests and perceptions
B. THE INTERNAL CONTEXT
This is aimed at understanding organisational elements and the way they interact, such as:
• Culture, internal stakeholders, structure, capabilities (in terms of resources such as people, systems, processes and capital), goals and objectives and the strategies in place to achieve these.
• Information flows and decision-making processes
• Reports, surveys, questionnaires, business plans, audits and records, expert judgements
C. THE RISK MANAGEMENT CONTEXT
The goals, objectives, strategies, scope and parameters for the risk management process itself must also be considered.
Note: The “Establish the Context” part of the risk management process will only need to be repeated when there are significant changes to either our external environment or business operations.
Step 3 – Identify Risks
Risk identification is a key step in the risk management process to ensure a list of relevant risks is identified.
Risks can be identified using various tools and techniques including:
Part of risk identification also involves identifying risks that may arise “over the horizon”. Some examples of possible considerations could include:
• Worldwide events.
• Raising public expectations re public sector entities.
• Changing public attitudes towards Government.
Identifying major risk elements provides a better understanding of the risk and assists when considering current controls and identifying further treatment actions. It also reduces risk duplication and minimizes confusion as to risk meaning

Step 4 – Analyse Risks
Once a risk is identified, it is important to adequately describe it. The components of a comprehensive risk description are:
• Event e.g. High staff turnover;
• Cause e.g. Staff job dissatisfaction; and
• Impact i.e. Inability to achieve strategic objectives.
Risk analysis involves:
• Identifying controls currently in place (or that can be deployed) to manage the risk by either reducing the consequence or likelihood of the risk;
• Assessing the effectiveness of current controls;
• Identifying the likelihood of the risk occurring; and
• Identifying the potential consequence or impact that would result if the risk was to occur.
When evaluating the effectiveness of current controls, the factors to consider include consistency of application, understanding of control content and documentation of controls where appropriate. Controls are aimed at bringing the risk within an acceptable level. The evaluation of current controls can occur through several different processes including:
• Control self-assessment;
• Internal Audit reviewing the effectiveness of controls; and
• External Audit reviewing the effectiveness of controls.
The consequence and likelihood ratings, as identified after consideration of current controls, are combined to determine the overall risk level.
Step 5 – Evaluate Risks
Risk evaluation involves considering the overall risk level. This allows determination of whether further risk treatment actions are required to bring the risk within an acceptable level.
The output of the risk evaluation phase is a prioritised list of risks. There may be times when the action required will differ from that identified above; however where this is the case, the GCEO must approve deviation from the above action.
Risk treatment involves examining possible treatment options to determine the most appropriate action for managing a risk. Treatment actions are required where the current controls are not managing the risk within defined tolerance levels. Treatment options could involve improving existing controls and implementing additional controls.
Possible risk treatment options include:
• Avoid the risk – change business process or objective so as to avoid the risk;
• Change the likelihood – undertake actions aimed at reducing the cause of the risk;
• Change the consequence – undertake actions aimed at reducing the impact of the risk;
• Share/transfer the risk – transfer ownership and liability to a third party; and
• Accept the risk – accept the impact of the risk.
• Enhance the risk- increase the likelihood of achieving the opportunity
• Exploit the risk – Increase the return on monetisation of the opportunity
When determining the preferred treatment option, consideration should be given to the cost of the treatment as compared to the likely risk reduction that will result (cost benefit analysis).
On selecting the preferred treatment option, the following should occur:
• The cost of any actions should be incorporated into the relevant budget planning process;
• A responsible person should be identified for delivery of the action, with this expectation being communicated to them;
• A realistic due date should be set; and
• Performance measures should be determined.
Risk information requires regular monitoring and review to ensure it remains current. The environment in which the Group operates is constantly changing and so therefore are our risks. If risk information is inaccurate, poor decisions will be made that could otherwise have been avoided. Therefore, Risk Owners and Risk Treatment Owners have key risk and control review and update responsibilities to ensure continued update of information pertaining to their particular risks. In addition, the risk registers will be reviewed periodically, and review participation may be broader than solely Risk Owners and Risk Treatment Owners.
It is also important for effectiveness, the risk management framework be monitored and reviewed. This framework drives the extent to which risks will be adequately managed throughout the Group. Monitoring implementation of the Risk Management Strategy is one available monitoring mechanism.
In addition, the risk management framework itself will be reviewed no less frequent than annual, with results being reported to the Audit & Risk Committee and the Parent Board. As risk management developments are constantly occurring, this review mechanism will provide the Group with information on current risk management developments, facilitating making continuous risk management improvements.
Risk Exposures
Below are some key risks categories which comprise the Group’s Risk Profile COMPLIANCE RISKS - This can be defined as risks or opportunities that are in relation to laws and regulations. Any risk that is a violation to public legal guidelines should be classified as a compliance risk. Data management, environmental impact, and corrupt practices are all examples of potential compliance risks. Risks that are linked to noncompliance and legal issues can bring about immense losses for the Group
CREDIT RISKS– This is risk due to uncertainty in a counterparty's (also called an obligor's or debtor’s) ability to meet its obligations. In assessing credit risk from a single counterparty, the Group must consider the issues of default probability, credit exposure and recovery rate.
CURRENCY RISKS - This is a form of risk that arises from the change in price of one currency against another. Assets or business operations across national borders, can make the company vulnerable to currency risk if their positions are not hedged.
CYBERSECURITY RISKS – This is information systems and communications exposure that can result from a cyber-attack, intellectual property theft or data breach in the Company. It relates to any event that can impact the technical infrastructure, use of technology or social media presence of the Group
EMERGING RISKS - The Group’s risk profile can change rapidly due to crises or events, or it could change more gradually overtime. Some emerging risk issues that require monitoring in the current environment include:
• Climate Risks
• Digital Currencies
• Pandemic Risks
• Disruptive innovations and technology (Autonomous vehicles, Artificial intelligence)
• Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) reporting mandates
FINANCIAL RISKS - This encompasses risks or opportunities to the Group in relation to monetary resources and cash flow. Funds, investments, and fraud are all risks within this category. Financial risks are essential in enterprise risk management, they heavily affect every aspect of a company.
HAZARD & SAFETY RISKS – These are potential threats that may compromise the health and wellbeing of employees in the workplace. Accidental injuries, non-communicable diseases amongst staff, geopolitical tension, epidemics, pandemics and natural disasters are all safety risks to be assessed. The Group must identify hazard risks in order to put in place control measures and treatment plans.
INSURANCE RISKS- This is the financial impact of events that may occur in the customer's environment that require settlement by the Group. It may limit the ability to spread the risk of these events occurring across other insurance underwriter's in the market. It is the risk of change in value due to deviations driven by controllable and uncontrollable factors leading to an inaccurate assessment of risks.
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY RISKS - This is the potential that regulations or legislation by the government could significantly alter the business prospects of one or more of the Group’s operations.
LIQUIDITY RISKS-The risk that arises from the difficulty of selling an asset. An investment may sometimes need to be sold quickly. The Group might lose liquidity if its credit rating falls, it experiences sudden unexpected cash outflows, or some other event causes counterparties to avoid trading with or lending to the institution. The Group is also exposed to liquidity risk if markets on which it depends are subject to loss of liquidity.
MARKET RISKS- This is the risk to the Group’s financial condition resulting from adverse movements in the level or volatility of market prices of interest rate instruments, foreign exchange, equities and currencies. Market risk is usually measured as the potential gain/loss in a position/portfolio that is associated with a price movement of a given probability over a specified time horizon. Market risk is the risk that the value of an investment will decrease due to moves in market factors.
OPERATIONAL & STRATEGIC RISKS - Strategic threats are risks that are caused by external circumstances; such as shifts in consumer demand or technological changes. Operational risks (people, process, systems) refer to day-to-day internal workings that may fail; such as data breaches and human error in performance. Both internal and external risks should be recognized and analysed
PEOPLE AND KNOWLEDGE RISKS– This encompasses risks to the value of the Group’s knowledge, skills or any proprietary information. It also includes risks to the hiring, performance management and succession of employees.
REPUTATION RISKS– Events that damages the Group’s brand, goodwill or the confidence that stakeholders such as investors, customers, regulators, partners, employees have in the enterprise.
SHARED RISKS– These are risks extending beyond a single entity which require shared oversight and management. Accountability and responsibility for the management of shared risks must include any risks that extend across entities and may involve other sectors, community, industry or other jurisdictions.
SUSTAINABILITY & ESG RISKS– The impact that the preservation or deterioration of environmental, social or governance factors has on business objectives either as a result of external factors or from the business not adapting to recognise and address these risks
UNDERWRITING RISKS – This includes uncontrollable triggers that may not have been predicted resulting in an inaccurate assessment of risks when writing an insurance policy
Risk Reporting
Risk management reporting is a key element of the ‘Monitor and Review’ phase of the risk management process and needs to occur at each step of the process. This risk management reporting process supports a formalised, structured, and comprehensive approach by the Group to the monitoring and review of its risks, thereby enhancing its risk management process. This is illustrated in Table 4.
Group Responsibilities
Parent Board of Directors
• Review reports
• Communicate risk information issues back to the organisation
• Discuss new and emerging risks as identified by management
Parent Audit & Risk Committee
• Review reports
• Communicate risk information issues back to the organisation
• Communicate key risk issues to the Board
• Discuss new and emerging risks as identified by management
GCEO
• Review reports
• Closely monitor extreme risks
• Identify new and emerging risks
• Provide executive support to theHead of GIA for example, requiring timely provision of risk information from the subsidiary sectors to theHead of GIA.
Group Risk & Sustainability Management Committee (GRSC)
C-Suite / Sector Executives
• Review reports
• Communicate key risk issues to the GCEO.
• Identify new and emerging risks
• Review reports
• Communicate key risk issues to the GRSC/GCEO
• Identify new and emerging risks
Group Responsibilities
Risk Owners
• Monitor and review the risks they own
• Prepare reports for the risks they own
• Provide theHead of GIA or Group Risk Manager with information on the risks they own
• Identify new and emerging risks
Group Chief Financial Officer
• Review reports prepared by theHead of GIA or Group Risk Manager
• Provide executive support to theHead of GIA or Group Risk Manager, for example, requiring timely provision of risk information from the organisation to theHead of GIA or Group Risk Manager
• Identify new and emerging risks
CRO or Group Risk Manager
Sector Management and Staff
• Prepare reports
• Gather risk information from the relevant organisational people, for example, Risk Owners
• Identify new and emerging risks
• Provide risk information to theHead of GIA/Group Risk Manager and or Sector Head/MD
• Monitor and review risks within their areas
• Identify new and emerging risks
Tracking And Documenting Losses And Near Misses
Loss Event Database (Appendix I)
For the Group’s management to be proactive and maintain control of emerging problems, management must be aware of what problems are developing. They must be systematically examining trends and symptoms. Only then can emerging risks be anticipated and mitigated. A Loss event database should therefore be maintained capturing both actual operational losses and near misses, which are incidents that could have resulted in injury, financial loss, and litigation of property damage but did not. Within this database, both internal and external events must be captured. To maximise the value gained from this, leadership must establish a reporting culture reinforcing that every opportunity to identify, control risks or prevent harmful incidents must be acted on. Risks should always be communicated and not ignored.
All near misses should be investigated to identify the root cause and the weaknesses in the system that resulted in the circumstances that led to the near miss. The reports generated or lessons learnt must be used to improve risk management systems as they represent an opportunity for training, feedback on performance and a commitment to continuous improvement. Managers and Supervisors are encouraged to foster open communication through the exercise of non-punitive coaching.
Key Risk Indicators
Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) are metrics that predict potential risks that can negatively or positively impact the Group’s business objectives. They quantify and track the internal and external environment giving clues into the functioning of the Group’s internal and external controls. In this way they communicate the changing landscape of the Group’s risk exposure. It is important that once the data is captured that risk teams brainstorm and document the likely risk events, likelihood and impact that can ensue if non-conformances are not addressed. Quality of data is premium. Typical sources of information would include reports and data from operations, documentation of performance issues leading to personnel errors and event reports provided from external operating experiences. This will assist with trend analysis that supports early identification of adverse trends and correction of aggregated minor problems that can moth ball into a risk source that triggers a significant failure within the Group’s business systems. Corrective actions that address identified weaknesses should be specified and implemented through the corrective action programme. Specific KRI’s should be developed for each business unit. As things change, all current metrics must be thoroughly reviewed; frequency will depend on internal and external changes, strategic goals, and other factors, but this should be done at least annually.
Examples of issues that can be converted into numerical KRIs include statistics involving People, Processes and Systems.
People
• Staff Turnover
• Overtime
• Client Claims and Complaints
• Absenteeism
• Staff Satisfaction
Process
• Outstanding Confirms
• Budget Overruns
• Corrections
• Suspense accounts
• Unusual transfers
• Mandate deviations
• Limit excesses
• Change orders
• Backlogs
• Corrections
• Text omissions
• Money laundering cases
• Litigation
• Audit issues outstanding
Systems
• Phishing scams
• Inappropriate data sharing
• Access controls failures
• Manual override
• Insufficient data capture
• Attempted breeches
Risk Escalation
Everyone has the ability to identify risks at any time. When these risks are identified outside of the formal risk review process, escalation of the risk to the appropriate recipient needs to occur.
Risk escalation is an important tool for ensuring that risks are known and understood by the people with the authority to appropriately manage them. If a situation poses an extreme risk and requires allocation of substantial risk treatment resources, then it would not be appropriate for this to be managed at the Company level. The Board has overall accountability for managing risks and therefore, where a risk poses such a high threat, the Board should be immediately informed of it.
The table set out below indicates the appropriate escalation process. TheHead of GIA will act as the conduit between the person who has identified the risk and the relevant escalation recipient. Therefore, if you identify a risk which requires escalation, please report it directly to theHead of GIA. TheHead of GIA will assess and review the risk information provided to them and escalate the risk in line with the requirements set out in table 5.
Review And Approval
Review and Monitoring is needed to ensure that the Risk Framework is sustained in accordance with the latest risk management standards and best practice. It requires ongoing monitoring and review to ensure:
• The policy and register are reflective of the Group’s internal and external environment.
• The risk management objectives have been achieved or are progressing satisfactorily.
• Reports provide the information necessary for decision making and continuous improvement.
• Risk management contributes to the Group’s purpose.
• Risk treatments are still effective in managing the risk.
The Risk Management Framework and report templates will be reviewed by theHead of GIA and approved at least every year by the 30th December.
References
For further information on risk management, the following documents provide a comprehensive and practical overview:
• ISO 31000 – Risk management - Principles and guidelines
• COSO Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework (2017)