Issuu

Architecture portfolio A compilation of select works from 2015 - present

Ankita Nalavade 2019937208 ankita.a.nalavade@gmail.com 1

Summary I have graduated with Masters of Sustainable Environmental Systems from Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, New York and have a background in architecture. My resume is a combination of strong design background and understanding of sustainable urban systems

Education Pratt Institute, New York Master of Science (MS), Sustainable Environmental Systems Aug 2016 – May 2018 -Climate change and Cities -Life Cycle Analysis -Green Infrastructure -Science of Sustainability

Kamla Raheja Institute of Architecture, Mumbai Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch.) Aug 2009 - Aug 2014

Waterfront Alliance New York City Waterfront Edge Design Intern June 2018 – Present Billie Cohen Landscape Design Studio, New York City Landscape Designer June 2018 – Present

Gowanus Canal Conservancy (GCC), New York City Green Infrastructure Fellow Dec 2017 – June 2018

New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, New York City Urban Ecology Intern May 2017 - July 2017

-Architectural Design and Urban Planning - Construction Drawings - HVAC, Electrical and Structural

Sanjay Puri Architects Mumbai, India Junior Architect

Skills

Jan 2015 - March 2016

3d Modeling/Rendering Sketch up, Revit, Rhino, Vray, Lumion Graphics In Design, Photoshop, Illustrator Drafting Auto Cad Mapping Arc GIS, Carto, Q - GIS 2

Work Experience

Ind + Architects Mumbai, India Junior Architect Jan 2015 - March 2016

Contents

SUSTAINABILITY COMMERCIAL

Commercial Kalpataru Complex - Pune, India CCR - Raipur, India

RESIDENTIAL

Residential Barot House - Mumbai, India Urbania - Mumbai, India Guntur Hostel - India Housing Complex - Montreal, Canada

MUSEUM

Sustainability Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines Energy analysis for Higgins Hall, Brooklyn Green Infrastructure in Brooklyn Public Library

Museum Crow Collection Museum - Dallas, Texas

WEDG Certified Project Case Study

Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines

Assessed using a previous version of WEDG

Parks Starlight Park

New York City, NY Internship Project project

June 2018 – Present

Task: Create notes for reviewers. Review submissions. Following projects were reviewed: Starlight Park, NY Bronx Point, NY Oak Point, NY North Waterfront, NC

NV5

Project Context: Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines (WEDG) is a credit based rating system for waterfront developments. WEDG guidelines establishes a process and threshold for certification to review a project’s performance relative to resilience, access, and ecology. The credits help guide the design process through six categories 1.Site Assessment & Planning 2.Responsible Siting & Coastal Risk Reduction 3.Community Access & Connections 4.Natural Resources 5. Innovation

NV5

Waterfront Alliance

Starlight Park is 25-acre park extending from Westchester Avenue toEast Tremont Avenue in the Bronx, New York.

New pathways and foot bridges will provide access to the Bronx River from Soundview on the east side of this section of the river for the first time in over 25 years, as well as increasing overall greenway continuity. Habitat restoration efforts include the replacement of hardened shorelines with restored tidal wetlands as well as 1.75 acres of wildflowers; more than 3,500 shrubs; nearly 200 trees; and 2,000 groundcover and vine plantings. In conjunction with NYC Parks’ regional restoration and invasive species removal plan for the Bronx River, the park is undertaking a rigorous two-year, parkwide invasive species management plan.

1 Site Selection & Planning 15/ 32 2 Public Access & Interaction 34/ 78 3 Edge Resiliency 52/ 102 4 Ecology & Habitat 56/ 66 5 Materials & Resources 7/ 39

Skills: Resiliency design Research Environmental Impact Statements ULURP

Starlight Park is the result of a decades-long community-driven planning effort. The creation of this 25-acre park on previously inaccessible brownfield sites closes an important gap in the 25mile Bronx River Greenway, reconnecting local communities to a restored waterfront with active and passive recreational features, including the state of the art Bronx River House. The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) created the park masterplan, and the New York City Departments of Parks and Recreation and Design and Construction completed the Bronx River House, which serves as the new headquarters for the park’s lead programming partner, the Bronx River Alliance. The park’s design and engineering consultants included NV5, WSP, Hardesty and Hanover. Kiss + Cathcart Architects and Starr Whitehouse designed the Bronx River House.

6 Operations & Maintenance 18/ 20 7 Innovation 15/ 20 TOTAL 197/ 357 Certification is at +130 Points

More than 60,000 square feet of rain gardens and an expansive 30,000 square foot retention basin have been planted, which will capture and filter 95% of the park’s runoff before it enters the Bronx River. The Bronx River House also provides 100% of its non-potable demand by capturing, storing, and treating stormwater runoff from its roof and hardscapes. Bronx River House’s design mitigates the urban heat island effect by reducing temperatures around the building by up to 5o F in the summer. The building envelope is clad with two layers of moss and vine-screens, which contribute to the cooler microclimate (and associated reduced load/operating costs)change colors with the season and provide habitat for birds and insects.

1867

Adelphi Academy

Energy Analysis of Higgins Hall Brooklyn, New York Graduate Project August 2017 Pratt Institute

Project Context: Higgins Hall is home for School of Architecture at Pratt institute. The build was build 135 years ago and is landmarked. The North and the South wing have different floor heights whichby is made Acquired Pratt,evident in the elevation. Even though the building is an Dept Of Architecture architectural master piece by Steven Hall, the energy systems are inefficient. The inefficient heating and cooling systems result into more energy consumption.

1965

Four alarm fire

1995 1999 2005

Task: My task involvedReopened instigating the issue, distribution of energy within the campus, underDesign standing landmark rules and for retaining the faRenovation byand constraints cade, analyzing opportunities and coming up Steven with Holl recommendations. Skills: Research Energy Analysis NYC Energy policy

Room 207 â€“ Higgins Hall

Green Infrastructure, Brooklyn Public Library Brooklyn, NY Graduate Project August 2017 Pratt Institute

Project Context: New Utrecht Library is a branch of Brooklyn Public Library. The library serves a diverse community where patrons of all ages can take part in the extensive program offerings, the most popular of which include Summer Meals, Kids Create, Chinese Brush Painting, Story Play, computer courses and ESOL classes. The libraryâ€™s large auditorium and three meeting rooms can accommodate a wide range of special programs, many geared toward older adults. Our task was to create Green Infrastructure strategy which can incur energy savings as well as reduce combined sewer outfall. Task: Conducting Site Analysis, Understanding green infrastructure systems, Designing Green/Blue roof Designing Biophillic environment Skills: Research Photoshop, InDesign

200

250

900

150 900

400

600

5513

250

150

350

150

8337

250

150

200

5100

250 350

150

900

250

600

150 900

400

900

200

6510

250

150

250

150

350

150 900

600

200

5100

250

150 900

400

600

150

600

200

4808

250

150 900

400

900

200

4808

250

150

200

3725 250

100

150

200

150

CUTOUT 275 X 325

CUTOUT 225 X 280

600X600

750X750

TERRACE BELOW

100 150

C7 750X750 750

3200

5850

200

150

0.00M)

250

NORTHREF PLANE

2550

150 150

150

250

Kalpataru Commercial Complex

600X600

750

C14

450

750X750

200

C13 750X750

131

50 150

3600

3760

360

1680

TERRACE/REFUGE AREA 11860X10200

19000

200

15250

150

2893

250

3207

2160

1290

250

450

4160

5050

250

1330

3300

500

2280

CUTOUT 700 X 250

5750

CUTOUT 225 X 280 50 250

CUTOUT 650 X 250 150

489

600X750

100 150

250

C28

W.C. 1350 X 1300

TD3

CUTOUT 450 X 250 150

4851

H.C TOI. 1500 X 2400

825

150

600

450

1039

150 900

136

CUTOUT 225 X 280

150

450

250

269

C MEN TOI. 3400 X 3950

TD3

600X900

600X750 W.C. 1350 X 1300

TD2

W.C. 1350X1900

C22

TD2 C

WOMEN TOI. 3400 X 3950

900

LW9

600

300X1500

C27

STORE ROOM

1200

C26

1550

218 217 216 215 238 237 236 235

TD3

200

250

150

250

W.C. 1350X1150

150 900

234

219

150

250

600X900 PANTRY 1900X3950

ELEC. ROOM 1800X2600

TD2

450

651

C21

750

3850

1500 550

2230

233

1700

220

D8 D8

232

5000

120

600

113

5240

200X4250

4006X200

150

4700

221

LIFT 03 1903X3050

3038

6130

231 222

SLAB SUNK BY 200 MM

200X1903

150 900

5039

200X3250 LIFT 01 1903X2230

CUTOUT 250 X 450

150

250

223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230

LW7

LW8

850

C 278

150

150 600

150 900

3 90

560 250

250

1990

1903

LW6

300X1500 DN

150

24 RISERS R=160.41 MM T=250 MM

(F.F. LIFT)

LIFT 01 1903X2230

169

24 RISERS R=160.41 MM T=250 MM

1903

150

450

178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170

350

150

LW5 200X2230

168

180

600X750

DN LW4 200X3430 167 UP

CUTOUT 400 X 280 193

900

2050

182 183 184 160 162 163 164 165 166

C25

150 100

150

181

600X600

150

600

250

200

750 150

150

5544

2420

5300

DEVELOPER / OWNER

KALPATARU LIMITED 91, Kalpataru Synergy, Opp Grand Hyatt, Santacruz (E), Mumbai 400 055, India +91 22 3064 5000 F +91 22 3064 4704 www.kalpataru.com GENERAL NOTES:

· · · ·

TERRACE +141.85

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS. DO NOT MEASURE THE DRAWING. FOLLOW WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ONLY. IN CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCY PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN SIZES FOR ALL COLUMNS TO BE TAKEN FROM STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. ALL ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RESPECTIVE DISCIPLINES.

3850

(+0.00M)

ST D1

C20

B 1903

CABIN 01 3303X5000

C24

600X600

1050

2230

CABIN 02 3225X5000

C23

783 50

1200

LDB

CABIN 03 3225X5000

550

ST D

PDB

CABIN 04 3412X5000

650

179

SOUTHREF PLANE

D D1

150

JANITOR'S ROOM 900 X 600

PASSAGE

R.W.D F.F.D 1200X450 1050X450

3050

D D2

600

L.V.D 550X450

D D3

150 900

G.D. 650X450 C

600X600

600X600 3300

450

C16

C15

150 750

450

250

200

100

250

400

600X750

450

400

150

GD2

C17 900

150 900

OFFICE 01 18850X12350

620

3390

OFFICE 02 13690X12875

250

150

400

150

150 900

150

250

150

250

600

250

200

150

Pune, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

Project Context: Kalpataru is a commercial project in Pune (city in India) with LEED gold certification. The building was designed in a way that it maximizes the light into the work space. The structure has open floor plate with balcony space on every floor.

C12 600X600

250

C11

C10

600X600

450

200

600X600

750

250

150

8TH FLOOR

A111 5TH FLOOR PLAN

+138.00

3850

RCC COLUMN 7TH FLOOR

3850

+130.15

6TH FLOOR

230 MM BLOCK WORK

200 MM BLOCK WORK

150 MM BOCK WORK

100 MM BOCK WORK 300 SUNK FOR LANDSCAPE

3850

+130.30

REFUGE AREA

5TH FLOOR

REFUGE AREA

+126.45

DESIGN ARCHITECTS

SANJAY PURI 3850

20, Famous studio lane, opp. Star TV, Mahalaxmi (w). Mumbai - 400 011. +91 22 24 96 58 40 LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS

4TH FLOOR +122.60

LIAISON ARCHITECT

SUBHAS SHAH AND ASSOCIATES.

3RD FLOOR

CLUSTER 1/3,KUMARCITY,KALYNINAGAR, PUNE-411014.

+118.75

3850

INTERIOR DESIGNER

2ND FLOOR

LIGHTING CONSULTANT

+114.90

SERVICES CONSULTANTS

3850

Skills: Auto CAD, Site work, Sketch Up

SCOOTER PARKING

CAR PARKING RETAINING WALL

3850

Task: Site inspection and management, Co ordinating project with HVAC, Irrigation and structural consultants Incorporating their drawings into the design drawing and creating a construction set for on site implementation

DYANESH G. BHAVE

27,SAINATH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MAHAKALI CAVES ROAD,ANDHERI-EAST, MUMBAI-400093

1ST FLOOR +111.05

STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS

JW CONSULTANTS LLP

3350

SAI RADHE,OFFICE NO 201, 2ND FLOOR 100KENNEDY ROAD,BEHIND HOTEL Le MEDRIDIAN,PUNE-411001.

2ND PARKING FLOOR +107.7

3350

REV. DATE

DESCRIPTION

1ST PARKING FLOOR

+100.15

4200

GROUND FLOOR

FG5

FG6

FG7

FG12

RS1 D9 R0 06.08.15 R0 24.06.14 DRAWN BY :

EXT ROAD LVL +99.40

VFC (INITIAL ISSUE) ADV COPY CHECKED BY : RG JS

PROJECT

OFFICE BUILDING

LEGEND GLAZING FINS GROUND FLOOR CLADDING

A201 NORTH ELEVATION

NOTE : - GLAZING DIVISIONS ARE INDICATIVE AND WILL BE UPDATED WHEN FINALIZED - DISTANCE OF PROJECTION WRITTEN IS IN METERS & TAKEN FROM REFERENCE PLANES

AT WAKDEWADI, PUNE, INDIA. DRAWING TITLE

NORTH ELEVATION PROJ. NO: 0261.01_PUN DATE :11.06.2014 SHEET NO.

A201

Rev.#

FILE PATH NAME:\ H:\Graduate Portfolios\untitled folder\0261.01_PUN_A200 Elevations.dwg

+104.35

Kalpataru Commercial Complex Pune, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

CCR Raipur, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

Project Context: This is a commercial complex built in Raipur, India. The owner of the building has a robust cement business in India and wanted the structure that creates diverse spaces as well as depicts strength and creativity of the cement - concrete structures. Task: Co ordinating with HVAC, Structural and lighting consultants. Modeling the surfaces in sketch up and creating working drawing set to be implemented on site. Skills: Construction Drawings, Sketch up, Auto CAD

SCO/AR/403-R6

0.239

1.454 1.175

0.750

1.45 0.15

0.75 2.30

0.60

1.80

1.49

1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178

B67

+8.85 +8.10

WF9A

1.125 1.125 1.125 1.125 1.125 1.125

W48

W47

1.133 1.133 1.133 1.133 1.133 1.133

1.045 1.045 1.045 1.045

S +3.90 M

1.175

4.20

0.60

R ±0.00 M

T' +11.40 M

B66

1.48

WF5

1.49

Q ±0.00 M

4.20

0.60 W26

WF9

1.18

B65

T ±0.00 M

1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200

0.139

0.050

1.45

0.15

BEAM PROFILE AT FACE

ROOF SLAB PROFILE 150MM WATERPROOFING 50MM SCREEDING FOR TRIANGULAR ROOFS

BOTTOM ROOF PROFILE

TOP ROOF PROFILE TOP ROOF POINTS BOTTOM ROOF POINTS

0.162

0.260

W14

W15

W16

W17

W14

W15

W16

W17

BAND LEVEL NODES

0.45

1.47 5

0.75

W12

0.235

PLINTH LVL +275.60 M PATHWAY LVL +275.30 M

A' +12.90 M

1.475

5.382

4.482

7.533

8.462

8.252

RP5+8.10

N1 +10.15 M

FLAT TERRACE

1.175

W12

BEAM B9

FIRST FLR LVL +279.80 M

0.60

0.45

A +8.10 M

N2 +10.15 M 0.15

0.370

RP5'+9.22 1.37

0.225

1.487

1.45

RP2+12.74

1.450

0.799

RP1+11.47 1.550

N' +12.90 M

A' +12.90 M

LEGEND

NOTES: 1. FOR ELEVATIONAL POINTS PATHWAY LVL (+275.30M) IS ASSUMED AS ±0.0M FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING. 2. PLEASE REFER BAND DETAILS SHEETS FOR BAND DETAILS. 3. DEPTH OF BEAM THAT HITS PERIPHERAL BEAM AT FACE WILL BE MORE. THE PERPENDICULAR DEPTH IS MAINTAINED AT 750MM. 3. PARAPET WALL THICKNESS TO BE AS PER ROOF DETAIL PLAN

POUR STRIP EXTENT

N3 +14.22 M

0.8

RP1'+12.287

RP2'+13.55

ELEVATION 14

ELEVATION 12

0.312 0.251 0.522

TERRACE FLR LVL +284.00 M

1.454

1.450

1.175

W27

4.20

E ±0.00 M

ELEVATION 03

LVL +288.20 M

Q ±0.00 M

0.30

F ±0.00 M

D +3.90 M

PERIPHERAL BEAM PROFILE FOR REF

B64

+8.10

W26

1.475

WF2

1.475

W27

1.475

1.501 0.90 1.94

0.30

1.475

BEAM B8 FOR CROSS REFERENCE

W28

Z ±0.00 M

ELEVATION 11

S' +9.90 M

+8.85

+8.10

W41A

G +3.90 M

R' +10.80 M

+8.85 0.60 4.20 0.60

W41

W40

1.454

D' +9.90 M

B60

1.460

B61

4.20

1.450

0.150

0.750

0.600

W39

1.175

B62

0.30

50 0.7

4.20 4.20 4.20 0.60 0.60 1.49 1.45

RP15'+8.96

U ±0.00 M

+8.10

Q' +12.15 M

PERIPHERAL BEAM PROFILE FOR REF B63

RP15+8.10 W5

4.20

8.100

T ±0.00 M

+8.85

W28

1.45

0.786

G' +9.90 M

RP16+11.52

0.786

PLINTH LVL +275.60 M PATHWAY LVL +275.30 M

1.450

0.63

W24

ELEVATION 15

F' +13.00 M

RP16'+12.32

0.050

LVL +288.20 M

0.589

W25

ELEVATION 02

FIRST FLR LVL +279.80 M

+8.10

1.475

H ±0.00 M

G +3.90 M

BEAM B8 FOR CROSS REFERENCE

0.90

0.12

0.633

3.14

1.48

J ±0.00 M

0.82

1.94

0.75

2.24

1.493

0.450

0.45

0.30

WF1

RP10+8.49

+8.85

RP13 +8.10 W24

0.118

K+3.90 M

RP10'+9.28

RP13' +8.85

0.60 4.20 0.60

W25 0.750

0.30

RP14 +8.10

0.148

TERRACE FLR LVL +284.00 M

0.150

RP14A +8.85

RP10+8.49

1.475

0.15 1.37

0.779

1.454

0.82

0.750

0.450

0.75

0.450

0.779

1.450

0.150

1.450

0.45

1.175

4.20 0.60

0.600

1.45 0

1.450

4.20 0.60

1.450

RP12+8.10

Q' +12.15 M U' +10.15 M Z' +10.15 M

0.112

G' +9.90 M

RP10'+9.28

1.475

4.20

RP11+11.52

T' +11.40 M 1.412

RP12A+8.95

0.633

PLINTH LVL +275.60 M PATHWAY LVL +275.30 M

0.7

FIRST FLR LVL +279.80 M

G2 +10.15 M

0.23 W38

0.291

1.4

G3 +10.15 M

0.160

H' +13.00 M

RP11'+12.31

1.450

1.45

TERRACE FLR LVL +284.00 M

K' +11.40 M

1.450

POUR STRIP EXTENT

K1 +12.90 M

LVL +288.20 M

P ±0.00 M

N ±0.00 M

A1 +14.22 M CP3

ELEVATION 06 C' +11.45

LVL +284.15 M

1.450

0.965

0.030

RP1+11.47

RP3+12.76

B37

W10

W10A

W10

F' +13.00 M

BEAM 92 TOP OF BEAM @+284.30 M

CP20

LVL +284.15 M

TERRACE

LVL +284.15 M

CP19

Y1 +10.15 M

TERRACE

W11

T' +11.40 M

LVL +284.00 M

1.47

C ±0.00 M

R' +10.80 M

.00

L +2

7.533 W9

S' +9.90 M

U' +10.15 M

ELEVATION 05

B ±0.00 M

H' +13.00 M

G2 +10.15 M

LVL +288.20 M

Y' +12.90 M N' +12.90 M

W49

0.897 0.8970.897

1.133 1.133 1.133 1.133 1.133 1.133

project no.

1.45

1.80

0.15

1.452

0.75

1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 1.178 0.750

1.49

1.175

1.125 1.125 1.125 1.125 1.125 1.125

G3 +10.15 M

S +3.90 M

K1 +12.90

TERRACE

L' +10.15 M

ELEVATION 13 scale

drawing name

date

200@A1 11-11-14

ROOF DETAIL drawing no.

W' +11.40

WF8

1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200

area/ building name CCR ADMIN BLDG. , RAIPUR

JUNE 2013 project title

LVL +284.00 M

W1 +12.90

TERRACE

R ±0.00 M

ELEVATION 04 SHREE CEMENT LTD.

+8.85

W2 +10.15 M

LVL +284.00 M

PATHWAY LVL +275.30 M

client

S' +9.90 M +8.10

WF8A

PERIPHERAL BEAM PROFILE FOR REF

0.60

W50

WF4

0.30

C ±0.00 M

B55A

X' +10.15M

1.48

1.475

WF3

B55

2.30

0.60

1.45

0.15

+8.10

4.20

1.470

D +3.90 M

3.90

+8.85

B54

0.75

4.20 0.60

1.454

+8.85 +8.10

W44

R'B53A+10.80 M

4.20 0.60

W43

2.300

2.300 W42

B50

1.47

0.30

W42A

B51

1.175

0.60

4.20

+8.10

FIRST FLR LVL +279.80 M 4.20

1.800

+8.85

C' +11.45 M

PERIPHERAL BEAM PROFILE FOR REF

B52

1.454

4.20

B53

D' +9.90 M

TERRACE FLR LVL +284.00 M

D' +9.90 M

PLINTH LVL +275.60 M PATHWAY LVL +275.30 M

.15

L +2

N2 +10.15 M

BEAM B9

1.47

Z' +10.15 M LV

FIRST FLR LVL +279.80 M

G' +9.90 M

04 Q' +12.15 M

N3 +14.22 M

8.252

0.750

0.75

A' +12.90 M

CP2

A +8.10 M

RP4+8.10

0.60

0.15

1.454

0.60

RP4'+8.880

0.76

TERRACE FLR LVL +284.00 M

0.0

1.45

C' +11.45 M

RP1'+12.287

1.175

LVL +288.20 M

0.050

LEVEL DIFFERENCE AS PER END OF ROOF SLOPE AS SHOWN IN KEY PLAN

0.812

0.017

RP3'+13.570 A1 +14.22 M

drawn

checked

KEY PLAN R6

ELE REVISED AS MARKED

26-11-2015

ELE REVISED AS MARKED

21-11-2015

ELE 05 REVISED, ELE 13 & 14 ADDED

09-11-2015

ROOF POINTS REVISED

ADDITIONAL LEVELS ADDED, TRIANGULAR ROOFS MODIFIED

23-10-2015

20-04-2015

notes 1. do not scale this drawing - follow only written dimensions 2. notify architect in case of any discrepancy or if additional information is required 3. all written material contained herein constitutes original and unpublished work and may not be

K' +11.40

drawing no.

SCO/AR/403- R6 drawing status

VFC

Barot House Mumbai, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

352

1165 B7B

1302

B8A

871

1327

B9A 905

1291 B9B

666

1181B6A

2758

C21

X2 C1C

3095 500

100

2095

W07

D2A

2695

350

3260

C1B

100

10435

LOBBY BELOW

3800

DINING 3710 X 4115

200X200MM CUT OUT FOR FLOOR TRAP 200X200MM CUT OUT FOR WC

C7 235

980

1145

C12 1220

TOILET 1245 X 2940

1230

4406

eq 1600

1600 DN

1500

1050

W01B

C18

C19A

Z2 Z3

Z3 C4B

4170 10555 100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT TOUCHING CHAJJA TOP

C4A

C14

C17

C3A

C19

1255

400

1220 400

V01

1255

C13

1475 1345

600

200X200MM CUT OUT FOR FLOOR TRAP

L2 L3

1255 20 RISERS T = 250 MM R = 152 MM

631

4474

1250 W02

570

D1B

(+0.00M)

C16

2750 900

3055

200

C15

C23

1500 4010

28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21

1540 808

180

REF PLANE

180

1255

31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 19 30 20 29

500

3435

D3C

3965

BEDROOM 02 3430 X 5380

2940

KITCHEN 2750 X 3965

4180

5380

3430

W03A

D1A

685

CUT OUT FOR ELECTRICAL CONDUITS

1220

C10

1400 LIFT 1.40 X 1.60

500

2045 1750

315

195 1000

215

D2A

C2B 1500

LVL + 3.20M

300

2155

1912

1150

475

3080

400

150

800

C2A

5380

LIVING 6680 X 3700

4115

3200

C21MC

W17A

REF PLANE

(+0.00M)

C20MC

X1 W04A

C1A

D2A

2230 1080

2711

B11

2831

1159

100

1200

1050 288

4785 3310

3093

Skills: Construction Drawings, Sketch up, Auto CAD

592

BEDROOM 02 3095 X 4430

700

200 1650

100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT 350MM BELOW SLAB TOP

B10

2697

135

200X125MM CUT OUT FOR FLOOR TRAP 200X200MM CUT OUT FOR FLOOR TRAP 200X200MM CUT OUT FOR WC

4430 D3C

1162

2630

1305

2680 3000 4375 W05

14370

Tasks: Site inspection and execution, Co ordinating with HVAC, Structural and lighting consultants. Modeling the surfaces in sketch up and creating working drawing set to be implemented on site.

BEDROOM 01 3180 X 4430

DETAIL 03 GB/AR/404

285 558 B8A B3A

W06

400 1550 100 50 TOILET 1550 X 2580

4430

V01

500

REF PLANE

(+0.00M)

1125

1080

1530 2190

Y3 DETAIL 02 GB/AR/403

1750

(+0.00M)

930

475 512

680

285 4035

2624

600

225

B1A

REF PLANE

944 625

B2A

Y5 DETAIL 01 GB/AR/402

100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT 350MM BELOW SLAB TOP

3180

100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT 250MM BELOW SLAB TOP

Y1 100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT 250MM BELOW SLAB TOP

1233

100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT 250MM BELOW SLAB TOP

180

Project Context: This is a luxury house built on a waterfront plot in Mumbai, India. The design comprised of concrete tessellations with window openings that have wood finished aluminum mullions. The execution of the form required regular site inspection, as the tessellations were not prefabricated but built on site. Special co ordination was required with structural engineers and HVAC consultants as conventional ducts and bars in the structural members had to be modified according to the design. The aluminum mullions had to be treated specially as the bungalow was located on the beach and the salinity in the air could corrode the aluminum rapidly.

D5 368

100 MM DIA PIPE INVERT AT TOUCHING CHAJJA TOP

APPROVED FINS

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

D5A

4706

REF PLANE

(+0.00M)

REF PLANE

(+0.00M)

Urbania Mumbai, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

Project Context: Urbania is a redevelopment apartment building project in Mumbai, India. Due to increase in FSI - Floor Space Index (equivalent to FAR) the redeveloped structure can have 37 floors. The lower level apartments are given to existing tenants whereas Task: Designing the built spaces and calculating the floor space. Creating presentation drawings for discussions. Skills: Architectural Design, Auto Cad, Photoshop, in Design

Urbania Mumbai, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

Hostel Guntur, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

Project Context: It is a hostel project in India. The design proposal was made for hostel project in Andhra Pradesh (AP) in India. The site has tropical climate with high summer temperature and heavy rainfall. The design reciprocates to the climate through orientation of the building and culture through design of spaces and use of vibrant colors. Task: Designing spaces by understanding massing, Architectural Planning and Creating presentation drawings Skills: Architectural Design, Auto Cad, Photoshop, in Design

Hostel Guntur, India Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

+25

7.15

M LV L

A TOTAL OF 36 HOUSES ARE LOCATED ON THE EXISTING CONTOURS WITH EACH ONE OPENING INTO TERRACES AND SITED IN A MANNER THAT ALLOWS EACH HOUSE TO ENJOY UNRESTRICTED VIEWS ON THE SOUTH AND THE SOUTHWEST.

Housing Complex

6M DRIVEWAY

+249.2M LVL

6M DRIVEWAY +246.15M LVL

3 BHK (G + 1)

ENTRY BELOW +257.15M

6M D 249 RIVEWA .5M LVL Y

+246.15M LVL

EN TR + Y BE 26 L 1M OW

EN TR + YB 26 EL 1M OW

250.45M LVL

2 BHK (G + 1)

W ELO YB ENTR 7.15M 5 +2

2 BHK (G + 1)

+257.15M LVL

ENTRY BELOW +257.15M

+253.80M LVL

ENTRY BELOW +249.2M

+249.2M LVL

6M D

RIVEW

ENTRY BELOW +249.2M

ENTRY BELOW +246.15M

AY EN T 26 RY B 4.3 EL 5M OW

2 BHK (G + 1)

EN T 26 RY B 4.3 EL 5M OW

2 BHK (G+ 2)

2 BHK (G + 2) W ELO YB ENTR 7.15M 5 +2

3 BHK (G+ 1)

3 BHK (G + 1)

ENTRY BELOW +246.15M

2 BHK (G+ 3)

+260.5M LVL

ENTRY BELOW +249.2M

+253.80M

+250.45M

+249.2M LVL

+246.15M LVL

247.5

248.0

248.5

249.0

2 BHK (G + 2)

+264.35M LVL

2 BHK (G + 1)

249.5

250.0

250.5

251.0

251.5

252.0

254.5

252.5 253.0 253.5

+264.35M LVL

255.0

254.0 247.0

255.5

256.5

256.0

257.0

257.5

258.0 258.5 259.0

UP +263.5M LVL

259.5

Task: Designing spaces by understanding massing Creating presentation drawings

+264.35M LVL EN + TRY 26 4.3 BEL 5M OW

2 BHK (G+ 3)

+261M LVL

+257.15M

+26 4.35 M LV L

6M DRIVEWAY

+261M LVL

2 BHK (G + 1)

ENTRY BELOW +246.15M

Project Context: The housing complex is designed in such a way that the natural elevation of the site is maintained by aligning the design to the existing contour levels.

VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND PARKING SPACES ARE ALL LOCATED ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE SITE WITH ONE CAR PARKING PER HOUSE AND A FEW ADDITIONAL PARKINGS.

2 BHK (G+ 2) ENTRY BELOW +249.2M

ENTRY BELOW +246.15M

3 BHK (G + 1)

RIVEW

Montreal, Canade Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

6M D

260.0

+26

3.5M

260.5

LVL

261.0 261.5

CLUSTER 04

CLUSTER 03

SITE PLAN

CLUSTER

Skills: Architectural Design, Auto Cad, Photoshop, in Design

01 01

03/04 03/04

TERRACED G +2 LEVEL BUILDING ORIENTED TOWARDS THE SOUTHWEST SITUATED ON THE STEEP CONTOURS FROM +250.45 TO +260.80M.

CARPET AREA (SQM)

UNIT TYPE

STOREY

FLOOR

2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2

BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK

G+1

GROUND FLOOR

2 2 1 3

BHK BHK BHK BHK

G+2

FIRST FLOOR

G+2

GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR

G+3

GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR

G+1 G+1

2 BHK TOTAL

CLUSTER 01

CLUSTER 02

G +1 UNITS AT +249.20M LVL.

G+1 UNITS AT +246.15M LVL.

GROUND FLOOR & FIRST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR & FIRST FLOOR

ENTR Y /E TO S XIT ITE

262.0

BLDGS. WITH VARYING HEIGHTS FROM G+1 TO G+3 ORIENTATED TOWARDS THE VIEWS ON THE SOUTHWEST SITUATED ON +261M TO +264.35M LVL.

262.5

263.0

NUMBER

116.26 113.73 107.26 105.23 103.21 84.88 105.23 103.21

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

101.06 106.05 106.05 78.39 138.26 111.20

2 4 4 4 2 6 36

TOTAL NO. OF CAR PARKS FOR 36 UNITS

CLUSTER 01 01

03/04 03/04

UNIT TYPE

STOREY

FLOOR

2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2

BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK BHK

G+1

GROUND FLOOR

2 2 1 3

BHK BHK BHK BHK

2 BHK TOTAL

FIRST FLOOR

G+2

GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR

G+3

GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR

G+2

GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR

G+1 G+1

GROUND FLOOR & FIRST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR & FIRST FLOOR

CARPET AREA (SQM)

NUMBER

116.26 113.73 107.26 105.23 103.21 84.88 105.23 103.21

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

101.06 106.05 106.05 78.39 138.26 111.20

2 4 4 4 2 6 36

TOTAL NO. OF CAR PARKS FOR 36 UNITS

LEVEL 4

+278.05 M LVL LEVEL 4

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 1

+274.70 M LVL +271.35 M LVL +268.00M LVL

LEVEL 2 +260.8M LVL TERRACE

+264.65M LVL

+261M LVL

LEVEL 1

+257.45M LVL

PARKING

+254.1M LVL

LEVEL 3

+249.20M LVL +246.45M LVL +246.15M LVL

LEVEL 2

WALKWAY

CLUSTER 02 DRIVEWAY

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 1

PARKING

+264.65M LVL

+264.35M LVL

+263.5M LVL

+261.30M LVL

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 2

+254.1M LVL

LEVEL 1

6M WIDE DRIVEWAY

+249.5M LVL 6M WIDE DRIVEWAY +246.15M LVL

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2

EXISTING CONTOUR

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 3

+257.45M LVL - PARKING

LEVEL 1 +250.45 +250.75M LVL

+263.5M LVL

LEVEL 2

+257.45M LVL

+250.45M LVL M LVL

+264.35M LVL

+261M LVL

+260.8M LVL TERRACE

+254.10M LVL

+249.2M LVL +249.50M LVL

+264.65M LVL

LEVEL 1

+261.30M LVL

+257.45M LVL - PARKING

+261.00M LVL +260.80M LVL

LEVEL 4

+249.2M LVL

+250.45 +250.75M LVL M LVL

LEVEL 1 +246.45M LVL

CLUSTER 04

PARKING STAIRWAY

DRIVEWAY

PARKING

CLUSTER 03CLUSTER 01

WALKWAY

CLUSTER 02

CLUSTER 01

PARKING

WALKWAY

DRIVEWAY

CLUSTER 01

WALKWAY

DRIVEWAY

Crow Collection of Asian Art Dallas, Texas Architectural Project Completed Sanjay Puri Architects

Project Context: Project Description: This concept proposal was made for Trammell & Margaret Crow Collection of Asian Art museum located in Dallas, Texas. The building exterior was designed to have a striking appeal and worked as a piece of art with a fluid form. Task: Designing spaces by understanding massing Creating presentation drawings Skills: Architectural Design, Auto Cad, Photoshop, in Design