WORKPLACE RELATIONS FEE DODGERS

Chasing telehealth payments from patients who’ve cut the phone line after a consultation can be costly to practice owners. AMA (NSW)’s Workplace Relations advisor, Melanie Fayad, investigates what you can do to protect your practice.

TELEHEALTH has found a permanent place in Australia’s healthcare system. Initially adopted by practitioners to provide patients with safe access to healthcare during the pandemic, telehealth has since become a convenient and flexible means of healthcare delivery.

While there are many positives to offering telehealth consultations to your patients, some doctors report it can leave your practice exposed to fee dodgers.

Fee dodgers (or “dine and dash” patients) are patients who have had a privately billed telehealth consultation with the doctor but hang up before being transferred to the receptionist for payment of the private fee.

Former AMA President, Dr Mukesh Haikerwal recently spoke about this issue within his own practice in Melbourne. Dr Haikerwal said that it was a difficult task to get ahold of patients that had not paid, and that follow-up calls to patients were often declined or excuses provided such as being too busy to talk. In extreme cases, Dr Haikerwal has had to use debt collectors.

The impact of non-payment is not small. Dr Haikerwal said that, at one point, the value of outstanding payments for telehealth consultations in his practice reached tens of thousands of dollars. There is also a cost to staff who are spending valuable time chasing payments from patients which should instead be applied to ensuring the smooth running of health services.

AMA (NSW) President, Dr Michael Bonning, believes this issue arises out of an assumption by many people that the value of a telehealth service is much less than a face-to-face consultation.

Dr Haikerwal agreed with this sentiment, adding that many GPs choose to bulk bill or charge low fees for telehealth consultations to appease a false perception among patients that consults over phone or video have a “low worth”. He called this a ‘slippery slope’, as it only furthered the assumption that telehealth was of low value to the point that when a GP did charge, patients would not pay.

Dr Bonning explained that private fees for telehealth services are reflective of the rising costs of running a business and that, like any other service, the training and experience that GPs bring to these consultations needs to be valued.

“The GP – like any other business owner or small business practitioner – needs to be able to pay to keep the lights on to run the Telehealth service, to pay for receptionists and staff, and all the other members of their team,” Dr Bonning said.