Journal of Cancer and Cancer Prevention Open Access Editorial
Volume 1 - Issue 1
What Are the Markers That Predict the Development of Having Cancer in the Future Without Laboratory or Radiological Tests? Huang Wei Ling * Medical Acupuncture and Pain Management Clinic, Franca, São Paulo, Brazil *
Corresponding author: Huang Wei Ling, Infectious Disease Specialist, General Practitioner, Nutrition Doctor, Acupuncturist, Pain
Management, Medical Acupuncture and Pain Management Clinic, Franca, São Paulo, Brazil Received date: 9 July, 2021 |
Accepted date: 26 July, 2021 |
Published date: 29 July, 2021
Citation: Huang WL (2021) What Are the Markers That Predict the Development of Having Cancer in the Future Without Laboratory or Radiological Tests? J Cancer Cancer Prev 1(1). doi https://doi.org/10.54289/JCCP2100101 Copyright: © 2021 Huang WL, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The topic that the author is writing today seems to be
improvement in all segments of the scientific methods in all
something that is not possible in the eyes of many Western
areas of medicine but they also had an economic intent to
medicine’s doctors but depending on the point of view we
control every prescription drug from every medical school
look at; our vision may widen [1].
and almost everyone [4, 5].
If we look back and evaluate everything that medical history
In the article written by Salmon and Thompson (2020),
comes to tell us, we can see that various cultures and peoples
entitled History of the Corporatization of American
have their traditions and beliefs and that we often confront the
Medicine: The Market Paradigm Reigns, they are saying that
new norms and rules that society imposes on us as right or
the interventions of these two foundations (Carnegie and
correct [2].
Rockefeller) in 1910, marked the first major phase of business
But the right or wrong is very variable and will depend on the
involvement in health care in America. This influences were
point of view of what society in each country thinks or
not a subtle way but influences the reasoning of medical
believes it can be. In the article written by Julian (2003)
doctors. They understood that all mechanism involved in the
entitled What is right and what is wrong about evidence-
human body is a mechanism way of thinking like the heart
based medicine? he is saying that practice should be based on
pumps, the kidney are filters and the lungs are bellows. The
good science. But randomized clinical trials can provide the
brain was considered the body’s computer [6].
best evidence according to him but has limitations [3].
This materialistic representation of the human body neglects
The practice of what Western medicine thought was right
the broader sense of the human being such as the mind and
was, from the point of view of Flexner, a professor who was
spirit. Many movements since 1970 extended the notion of
not a doctor and who changed the entire medical education
human healing and in other countries such as in German,
system in the Americas, Asia and Europe, leaves its
there were alternative health movements saying that “health
implantation in 1910, and with these changes he changed the
is more” than just medical care [6].
way of teaching of the medical faculties from his point of
But what they sadly saw at that time was that social media
view of what was right for medicine, thinking that what he
fueled that alternative medicine is a unregulated market place
thought was what was considered scientific, since from 1913
and many times confusing the minds of the people and also,
onwards he had the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundation as
all the doctors that works with this kinds of thinking also has
his backbone. With this implantation, there was an
this position when facing treatments by these kinds of therapy
www.acquirepublications.org/JCCP