Dan & Me and Gun Control

1 Dan & Me and Gun Control Public discourse about controversial subjects in the USA typically tends to split opinion. Instead of being open to developing nuanced discussions regarding issues, many people tend to cling to extreme opinions and see the other side as the enemy. However, the first article by Shane Windmeyer demonstrates that it is possible to uphold one’s values while also remaining open to how other people view the world. In this case, by interacting with someone with opposing views, the author came to understand that once an opinion is given a human face, then it becomes possible to reach a place where constructive debate can happen.

Buy this excellently written paper or order a fresh one from acemyhomework.com

2 Equally, in Brené Brown’s article about gun control, the author contests the fact that the conversation about gun control has now become about whether or not a person occupies two binary positions. In admitting that one typically uses guns, then the common perception will be that a particular person is against gun control. On the other hand, by admitting that one supports gun control, then the other side automatically concludes that every person who uses a gun is pro-violence and aggressive tendencies in society.

From both of these articles, the general idea is that people should avoid having simplistic views about complex issues. Additionally, both articles suggest that getting as much information as one can on a particular subject is the best way to combat false arguments that are not based on critical thinking. Without having the best information on a subject, one is likely to be guided by stereotypes, and not facts, when they are making decisions. Finally, with factual information, it is more likely that people will see that they have more in common with each other than they had previously believed to be the case.