condition, artists—working with AI—can do almost anything:
manual image-making appears inefficient, even futile. But art may
compose like the old masters, or generate concepts like the new.
well persist in precisely such futility. Consider the contemporary
Does this suggest a rebirth of art after its supposed end?
marathon runner: no longer a messenger carrying urgent news, but an individual testing the limits of the body. The act is no longer
Hardly. If anything, it intensifies the condition of ending. When AI
necessary, yet it acquires new meaning. Likewise, the insistence
can endlessly generate the images artists envision, the artwork
on hand painting in the age of AI is not about producing images,
risks becoming valueless. How, then, might value be restored? A
but about affirming human capability—about sustaining a mode of
possible answer lies in a return to craft. It is precisely through
poetic existence.
his commitment to technique that Kim Jun-sik transfigures the ordinary into art.
Kim Jun-sik does not, however, retreat into nostalgic subjects. He does not idealize beauties or indulge in picturesque
TRANSFIGURATION — ON THE PAINTINGS OF KIM JUN SIK
Auspicious Cranes 120×40cm(6 pannels) Oil on Korean paper, 22k gold leaves 2018
By Peng Feng
“Transfiguration” is a concept Arthur Danto borrows from religion to theorize contemporary art. To clarify it, he invokes the well-known saying of Qingyuan Weixin: “Seeing mountains as mountains; seeing mountains not as mountains; and finally, seeing mountains still as mountains.” For Danto, contemporary art is art that recognizes itself as art. Apart from this added layer of “recognition,” it is indistinguishable from ordinary objects—
Kim’s paintings enact a kind of alchemy. His subjects are
landscapes. Instead, he paints the ordinary realities of his own
mundane: tree branches, banana peels, even crushed cans
time, articulating a personal understanding of life and revealing a
reminiscent of Warhol’s soup imagery. Yet unlike Warhol’s iconic
distinct temperament. While such images could be generated by
cans, Kim depicts them flattened—cheaper, more abject, and
AI, without Kim’s prior act of painting, who would have imagined
formally unpredictable. His choice of subject underscores a crucial
them in this way? The principle that “painting reflects the person”
point: the value of painting does not reside in what is depicted,
becomes more urgent than ever in the age of AI. Just as running
but in how it is made. What transfigures the ordinary here is not
a marathon today is no longer about delivering a message but
concept, but technique.
about demonstrating one’s capacity, painting is no longer about producing images but about manifesting an inner disposition. To a
To advocate a return to craft may sound conservative, even
certain extent, what viewers respond to in Kim’s work is not only
regressive. Yet it is precisely this “untimeliness” that may sustain
the painting, but the person behind it.
painting. In an age when AI can generate any image on demand, Out of the frame 55×55cm Oil on Canvas 2024
Brillo cartons and Warhol’s fabricated replicas, such distinctions are not decisive. What matters is intention: Warhol consciously produced them as artworks, whereas factory workers did not. The alchemical transformation is not grounded in material, craft, or quality, but in consciousness—in the recognition of something as art. It is precisely this transformative awareness, Danto contends, that signals the “end of art.”
just as the final stage of “seeing mountains still as mountains” is perceptually identical to the initial stage.
When Danto passed away in 2013, artificial intelligence had not yet reached its current level of development. Image generation
In this framework, Andy Warhol and his Brillo Boxes become exemplary . Danto argu es tha t Wa rho l, t hro ugh a form of “awareness,” transfigured supermarket packaging into art. Although there are material differences between commercial
4
remained in its infancy. Had he lived longer, he might have witnessed that artists are no longer limited to transfiguring readymades through recognition; with AI, they can externalize their “awareness” into fully realized visual forms. In this expanded 5
condition, artists—working with AI—can do almost anything:
manual image-making appears inefficient, even futile. But art may
compose like the old masters, or generate concepts like the new.
well persist in precisely such futility. Consider the contemporary
Does this suggest a rebirth of art after its supposed end?
marathon runner: no longer a messenger carrying urgent news, but an individual testing the limits of the body. The act is no longer
Hardly. If anything, it intensifies the condition of ending. When AI
necessary, yet it acquires new meaning. Likewise, the insistence
can endlessly generate the images artists envision, the artwork
on hand painting in the age of AI is not about producing images,
risks becoming valueless. How, then, might value be restored? A
but about affirming human capability—about sustaining a mode of
possible answer lies in a return to craft. It is precisely through
poetic existence.
his commitment to technique that Kim Jun-sik transfigures the ordinary into art.
Kim Jun-sik does not, however, retreat into nostalgic subjects. He does not idealize beauties or indulge in picturesque
TRANSFIGURATION — ON THE PAINTINGS OF KIM JUN SIK
Auspicious Cranes 120×40cm(6 pannels) Oil on Korean paper, 22k gold leaves 2018
By Peng Feng
“Transfiguration” is a concept Arthur Danto borrows from religion to theorize contemporary art. To clarify it, he invokes the well-known saying of Qingyuan Weixin: “Seeing mountains as mountains; seeing mountains not as mountains; and finally, seeing mountains still as mountains.” For Danto, contemporary art is art that recognizes itself as art. Apart from this added layer of “recognition,” it is indistinguishable from ordinary objects—
Kim’s paintings enact a kind of alchemy. His subjects are
landscapes. Instead, he paints the ordinary realities of his own
mundane: tree branches, banana peels, even crushed cans
time, articulating a personal understanding of life and revealing a
reminiscent of Warhol’s soup imagery. Yet unlike Warhol’s iconic
distinct temperament. While such images could be generated by
cans, Kim depicts them flattened—cheaper, more abject, and
AI, without Kim’s prior act of painting, who would have imagined
formally unpredictable. His choice of subject underscores a crucial
them in this way? The principle that “painting reflects the person”
point: the value of painting does not reside in what is depicted,
becomes more urgent than ever in the age of AI. Just as running
but in how it is made. What transfigures the ordinary here is not
a marathon today is no longer about delivering a message but
concept, but technique.
about demonstrating one’s capacity, painting is no longer about producing images but about manifesting an inner disposition. To a
To advocate a return to craft may sound conservative, even
certain extent, what viewers respond to in Kim’s work is not only
regressive. Yet it is precisely this “untimeliness” that may sustain
the painting, but the person behind it.
painting. In an age when AI can generate any image on demand, Out of the frame 55×55cm Oil on Canvas 2024
Brillo cartons and Warhol’s fabricated replicas, such distinctions are not decisive. What matters is intention: Warhol consciously produced them as artworks, whereas factory workers did not. The alchemical transformation is not grounded in material, craft, or quality, but in consciousness—in the recognition of something as art. It is precisely this transformative awareness, Danto contends, that signals the “end of art.”
just as the final stage of “seeing mountains still as mountains” is perceptually identical to the initial stage.
When Danto passed away in 2013, artificial intelligence had not yet reached its current level of development. Image generation
In this framework, Andy Warhol and his Brillo Boxes become exemplary . Danto argu es tha t Wa rho l, t hro ugh a form of “awareness,” transfigured supermarket packaging into art. Although there are material differences between commercial
4
remained in its infancy. Had he lived longer, he might have witnessed that artists are no longer limited to transfiguring readymades through recognition; with AI, they can externalize their “awareness” into fully realized visual forms. In this expanded 5
Red Meihua - The great selfie - Kinopio 50x99cm Oil on Korea paper 2026
54
55
Red Meihua - The great selfie - Kinopio 50x99cm Oil on Korea paper 2026
54
55
Gold Meihua - Chinese zodiac - Tiger 30x30cm Oil on Korean paper, 22k gold leaves 2026
58
Gold Meihua - Chinese zodiac - Horse 30x30cm Oil on Korean paper, 22k gold leaves 2026
59
Gold Meihua - Chinese zodiac - Tiger 30x30cm Oil on Korean paper, 22k gold leaves 2026
58
Gold Meihua - Chinese zodiac - Horse 30x30cm Oil on Korean paper, 22k gold leaves 2026
59
Red Meihua - Contemporary Art 142×80cm Oil on Korean paper 2025
68
The great selfie 125×70cm Oil on Korean paper 2025
69
Red Meihua - Contemporary Art 142×80cm Oil on Korean paper 2025
68
The great selfie 125×70cm Oil on Korean paper 2025
69
2023-2024
70
KIM JUN SIK
Out of the frame - Mona lisa 70×40cm Oil on Korean paper 2024
71
2023-2024
70
KIM JUN SIK
Out of the frame - Mona lisa 70×40cm Oil on Korean paper 2024
71
Anonymity-batman 55×55cm Oil on Canvas 2017
154
Anonymity-white mickey 55×55cm Oil on Canvas 2017
155
Anonymity-batman 55×55cm Oil on Canvas 2017
154
Anonymity-white mickey 55×55cm Oil on Canvas 2017
155
Self-verification (dark blue) 54×54cm Oil on anvas 2017
156
Self-verification (dark green) 54×54cm Oil on anvas 2017
157
Self-verification (dark blue) 54×54cm Oil on anvas 2017
156
Self-verification (dark green) 54×54cm Oil on anvas 2017
157
学无止境 50×50cm Oil on anvas 2017
158
天天向上 50×50cm Oil on anvas 2017
159
学无止境 50×50cm Oil on anvas 2017
158
天天向上 50×50cm Oil on anvas 2017
159
Campbell's Sunflowers 180×90cm Oil on Canvas, 3 Cans 2011
258
259
Campbell's Sunflowers 180×90cm Oil on Canvas, 3 Cans 2011
258
259
KIM JUN SIK
260
Campbell's Spidermans 180×90cm Oil on Canvas 2011
261
KIM JUN SIK
260
Campbell's Spidermans 180×90cm Oil on Canvas 2011
261