THE LAST
WORD
Westwick-Farrow Media A.B.N. 22 152 305 336 www.wfmedia.com.au Head Office Unit 5, 6-8 Byfield Street, North Ryde Locked Bag 2226, North Ryde BC NSW 1670 AUSTRALIA
AI-ENABLED CONFIGURATION TRANSLATION
ph: +61 2 9168 2500 Editor Glenn Johnson
I
grew up in a frustratingly monolingual household. This was in stark contrast to the primary and secondary schools I attended, both of which had large numbers of first-generation Italian, Greek and Asian students who had acquired sophisticated multilingual abilities. As someone who is fluent in only one language and loves to travel, I am not surprised that language translation is one area where AI is having such a significant impact. The speed, accuracy and breadth of software-based language translation has greatly improved with the rapid adoption of AI-based software tools. Automation has long been hampered by its own language translation problems. Configuration software prepared in one platform is not easily transferrable to another. Even systems from the same vendor, but of different generations, typically require complex translation. This problem has been recognised by many, including the Open Process Automation Forum, which defined configuration portability as a core objective. It is perfectly reasonable that end users, nominally operating the same plant in locations with different automation platforms, shouldn’t have to build and maintain unique configurations. The accurate functional translation of configuration between automation systems is a complex and laborious task. This difficulty has long hindered automation modernisations. Because of the challenges imposed by the need to translate the configuration, end users have too often persevered with platforms — or vendors — that have long ceased providing the value expected from modern automation systems. The core of the translation challenge is that it requires a high level of proficiency in both the source and target systems. The software world is facing similar challenges, such as translating legacy COBOL codebase to modern alternatives. Control system modernisation is typically a once-in-a-generation activity, rich with opportunity and risk. While the result of a system modernisation should provide a more maintainable, highly featured, expandable, easier-to-use system, there are significant risks. Among these are unplanned production losses, safety issues, equipment damage and operator disorientation. Therefore, somewhat hardened by my career of modernising automation systems, I’m excited by the possibilities that AI can bring to this challenge. An example of such an initiative is Emerson’s DeltaV Revamp tool, where AI and ML power the assessment and translation of legacy system configuration into the DeltaV platform. If tools such as this can reduce the effort and risk of accurate functional translation, then the barriers to system modernisations can be greatly reduced. This will bring forward a whole host of benefits to end users. In the same way that native languages of different cultures will always exist, it’s likely that different ‘languages’ of automation platforms will always exist. Perhaps the most efficient way of tackling this is through more effective translators. This will allow system vendors to differentiate and advance their platforms without the burden of potentially restrictive standards. Some caution will of course be required. Errors in language translation between cultures might result in some embarrassment, but errors in automation configuration may have physical-world impacts. Some level of expert human translation will likely always be necessary to reach the standards required. Therefore, organisations that invest in both AI tools and their engineers will benefit most from the accuracy and speed of this new translation paradigm. As I see it, the coming years will offer great opportunities for the application of these exciting tools.
pt@wfmedia.com.au Managing Editor Carolyn Jackson Publishing Director/MD Janice Williams Art Director/Production Manager Linda Klobusiak Art/Production Marija Tutkovska Circulation Alex Dalland circulation@wfmedia.com.au Copy Control Ashna Mehta copy@wfmedia.com.au Advertising Sales Sandra Romanin – 0414 558 464 sromanin@wfmedia.com.au Tim Thompson – 0421 623 958 tthompson@wfmedia.com.au If you have any queries regarding our privacy policy please email privacy@wfmedia.com.au
Printed and bound by Ive Print Post Approved PP100007403 ISSN No. 0819-5447
Westwick-Farrow Media is committed to using environmentally responsible print services to produce our publications. This edition is made with a mixture of materials from FSC-certified forests, recycled materials, and/or FSC-controlled wood. While controlled wood doesn't come from FSC-certified forests, it mitigates the risk of the material originating from unacceptable sources . It is delivered in a totally degradable plastic wrapper. All material published in this magazine is published in good faith and every care is taken to accurately relay information provided to us. Readers are advised by the publishers to ensure that all
PROCESS TECHNOLOGY JUN/JUL 2025
necessary safety devices and precautions are installed and safe
34
working procedures adopted before the use of any equipment found or purchased through the information we provide. Further, all performance criteria was provided by the representative company concerned and any dispute should be referred to them.
With over 25 years of experience delivering automation projects, Stephen Cowhey, Lead Engineer at Emerson, has a keen interest in the adoption of new technology to improve project execution.
Information indicating that products are made in Australia or New Zealand is supplied by the source company. Westwick Farrow P/L does not quantify the amount of local content or the accuracy of the statement made by the source.
PROCESSONLINE.COM.AU