The Texas Education Technology Leaders (TETL) Next Digital Shift Committee elected to use a collaborative research framework as a structured approach to report on compliance with the SCOPE Act. This article aims to share practical experiences from districts across the state and provide actionable insights and recommendations. Participating districts were Corpus Christi ISD (33,387 students), Cypress-Fairbanks ISD (118,155 students), Prosper ISD (28,118 students), and Schertz-Cibolo Universal City (15,528 students). The authors shared experiences, conducted interviews, gathered survey information, and shared case studies. The SCOPE Act provides for several safety measures around social media platforms. Parents must consent to minors creating social media accounts and mandate that the social media platform verify the user's age and obtain parental consent before allowing minors to access services. The bill encourages the development of tools for parents to monitor and control their children’s online activities. Vendors must provide transparency regarding such tools and assist parents with usage. The bill also provides for stricter data privacy standards for minors, limiting the collection and sharing of personal information unless it is essential for service. It calls for stateled initiatives to educate parents, children and educators about online safety, digital citizenship and the potential risks of the internet. SCOPE also establishes a mechanism for enforcement, including possible penalties for vendor noncompliance with requirements for parental consent and age verification. Collaboration between social media platforms, law enforcement and other entities is promoted. The intent is to establish reporting mechanisms for cyberbullying, online harassment and exploitation.
the SCOPE Act, organizations need clear guidelines, strong technological systems and continuous training. Effectiveness hinges on building a compliance culture supported by leadership and proactive monitoring.”
perspective of technology leadership in Texas districts, we aim to achieve compliance by fostering a culture of shared trust between parents, students and, ultimately, the vendors who will need to handle any of our students’ data.
The authors’ findings indicated that com- Our primary goal is safeguarding our stumon difficulties faced by school districts dents' and staff 's personal information. included: This means thoroughly vetting our technology stack, ensuring data sovereignty, • developing a process for evaluating and having vendors sign our data protecdigital resources tion agreement. • identifying and vetting all relevant Several Texas school districts have implevendors and service providers for mented measures to comply with the compliance SCOPE Act. The following case study shows “real-life compliance with the • monitoring vetted applications for SCOPE Act.” privacy/security updates or changes CFISD set the following criteria for • difficulty having service providers student software and technology. This respond with completed Texas data criteria was used to develop the districtprivacy agreements approved lists for the 2024-25 school year. • navigating complex ownership structures of technology companies • discussions with digital resources companies regarding noncompliance criteria • balancing compliance with budget constraints and existing contracts • having staff resources and time for application vetting • ensuring continuity of services while transitioning to compliant providers
The goals of the SCOPE Act can be summarized in a single word: trust. School districts are expected to provide transparency regarding the tools used in the education process and the specific data elements for each student that may be Paula Ross, assistant superintendent of shared through digital resources. These technology services and information sys- disclosures of particular products will tems for CFISD states, “To comply with also enhance financial accountability and curricular understanding. From the
1. Software should include a published privacy policy, published terms of services and published age limitations. 2. Software should not include chat, published profiles, social sharing or advertisements. 3. Software applications must not conduct mental health assessments or other assessments unrelated to educational curricula without direct and informed consent. 4. Complaints or concerns regarding student use of electronic devices should be reported to campus administration or through the CFISD Tipline located on the district website.
WINTER 2025
39