6 minute read

Rehabilitation of an Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury In a Professional Footballer Incorporating the Use of the Empowerband Ankle Support

FEATURE / DAVID FEVRE MSC, CHRIS WILDING MSC, RHYS DALY & CHASE HOMER

Introduction

Advertisement

Lateral ankle ligament injuries are common in most sports, particularly in football. The most recent studies put the incidence of such an injury in a range of 10-17% of all injuries (1,2,3) in elite soccer. The majority of these injuries are managed conservatively with a graduated rehabilitation programme before returning to play. This often involves the use of an immobilisation boot, brace or strapping with the progressive increase in load-bearing demanded throughout the specific rehabilitation stages. Recovery time for ankle sprains varies between 7 –34 days; post-surgery in more severe cases this figure is reported as 77-105 days (4)

Case Report

The subject is a 21-year-old professional footballer who is presently contracted to a professional English soccer team in EFL 2 for the 2020-2021 season. He primarily plays as a left-sided full-back or midfielder and has represented his country at U-18, U-19 and U-21 level. His injury occurred in a pre-season friendly match when he came on as a substitute. Two minutes after entering the field of play, his left foot was trapped in a collision with an opponent and his fixed foot ‘rolled’ over into a plantarflexed/ inverted position. He tried to play on but 5 minutes after the injury he was substituted to prevent further damage.

On initial examination, he complained of moderate pain over the anterolateral aspect of the ankle, with an effusion over the anterior/ inferior lateral malleolus. He had tenderness on direct palpation of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) with mild to moderate instability on stress testing. All other ankle structures appeared normal. He was treated with ice, compression and elevation using a Cryo-cuff with ankle attachment (Picture 1) and immobilised in an immobilisation walking boot (Picture 2). His injury was re-assessed daily but no further stress testing of the ATFL was performed until day 5 to allow the acute symptoms to subside and repair tissue to start to form. Each day his symptoms subsided and after re-examination on day 5, the medical team were happy that the player had an isolated Grade2 tear of the ATFL. An MR (Magnetic Resonance) scan was considered but after daily discussion with the player/medical team, this was decided to be unnecessary as physically and psychologically the player was improving daily without this additional intervention.

Intervention and Outcome

In order to assist his rehabilitation after coming out of the immobilisation boot, the player was offered the use of a semi-rigid Empowerband ankle support (Picture 3) which is worn over the boot unlike most other ankle braces or supports and which has been designed specifically for football.

PIcture 1. Cryo-cuff PIcture 2. Immobilisation walking boot PIcture 3. Empowerband ankle support

The player himself was very keen to use this and wore it throughout the proliferation and re-modelling phase of his rehabilitation, post immobilisation boot. Exercise therapy combined with progressive weight bearing is an essential stage in the functional treatment of acute lateral ligamentous sprain [11] and the use of the Empowerband support at all stages gave a physiological and psychological assistance as well as sports specificity to his recovery. Early active range of motion exercises were subsequently followed by strengthening exercises, proprioceptive training and functional exercises. It has been shown that external ankle support does not impede speed, agility and kicking accuracy in football players (7). Sports specific activities in the final phase progressively simulated the physical demands of football, many similar to the drills accessible on the Empowerband web site (https://www.empowerband.com).

The player returned to full training 23 days post-injury and was back in the first-team squad as a substitute 9 days later after a full week of training with the first-team squad, where he continued to wear the Empowerband ankle support.

The other common option after coming out of the immobilisation boot is to tape the ankle, twice daily for rehabilitation and training sessions. Although a recent study reported no differences in outcome 6 months after treatment with tape, semi-rigid brace, or lace-up brace [9], a significant number of studies report superior results from protection with a brace [8, 10]. There is a consensus that external ankle braces can reduce the reoccurrence by approximately 70% (5) but it is unclear whether external braces are more effective than strapping as there are advantages and disadvantages for both. Taping can produce skin lesions and loses 50% of its effectiveness 15 minutes after application with intense exercise (6). However, some athletes do not like braces as they may not sit correctly in football boots and can be initially expensive. However, they are reusable, re-adjustable and need minimal expertise to apply. At present-day prices, the cost of the tape materials would be approximately £4 per strapping at a cost of more than £250 for his 32-day rehabilitation/return to training postinjury. This works out at a cost of 6 times more expensive than the Empowerband brace. It would also have necessitated application by a sports medicine professional twice a day

Conclusion

Rehabilitation of an ATFL injury is a common case for many sports’ medical professionals. For a successful return to sport, it is important that each stage of the recovery is only progressed after successful clinical outcomes have been achieved. To try and fast track the recovery process can often lead to re-occurrence of this type of injury, so any product which can assist and supplement the skills of the sports physiotherapist while helping the player both physically and mentally can only be an adjunct. In this process, the use of the Empowerband ankle support helped achieve the aforementioned goals throughout the rehabilitation programme, albeit as demonstrated in this single case study. Further similar reports using a larger number of players is necessary to assess the use of this particular ankle brace.

1. Waldén M, Hägglund M, Ekstrand J. Timetrends and circumstances surrounding ankle injuries in men’s professional football: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA champions league injury study. Br J Sports Med. (2013) 47(12):748–53 2. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports. (2011) 45(7):553–8 3. D’Hooghe P, Cruz F, Alkelahifi K Return to play after a lateral ligament sprain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2020) 13:281-288 4. Pearce CJ, Tourne Y, Zellers J, Terrier R, Toschi P, Silbernagel KG, et al Rehabilitation after ankle ligament repair or reconstruction (2016) Knee Sports Surg Traumatol Arthrosc 24 (4):11301139 5. Dizon JM, Reyes JJ A systematic review on the effectiveness of external ankle supports in the prevention of inversion ankle sprains among elite and recreational players (2010) J Sci Med Sport 13 (3):309-317 6. Frankeney JR, Jewett DL, Hanks GA, Sebastienelli WJ A comparison of ankle taping methods (1993) Clin J Sports Med 3 (1): 20-25 7. Putnam AR, Bandolin SN, Krabak BJ Impact of ankle bracing on skill performance in recreational soccer players (2012) PM R 4 (8) 574579 8. Petersen W, Rembitzki IV, Koppenburg AG, Ellermann A, Liebau C, Brüggemann GP, Best R. Treatment of acute ankle ligament injuries: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. (2013) 133(8):1129–1141. 9. Van den Bekerom MP, van Kimmenade R, Sierevelt IN, Eggink K, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN, et al. Randomized comparison of tape versus semi-rigid and versus lace-up ankle support in the treatment of acute lateral ankle ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2016)24(4):978–984. 10. Kemler E, van de Port I, Backx F, van Dijk CN. A systematic review on the treatment of acute ankle sprain: brace versus other functional treatment types. Sports Med. (2011)41(3):185–197. 11. Kerkhoffs GM, Handoll HH, de Bie R, Rowe BH, Struijs PA. Surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2007)2:CD000380.

This article is from: