BEST ON SHOW
CO O L E R
stand
143
HALL 1
Cool runnings
Ahead of its participation in the 2025 Truck Show, the Cooler team provide a low-down on the pros and cons of Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer versus Cold Room Panels for refrigerated truck bodies
M
130
aterial selection for refrigerated truck bodies can significantly impact operational efficiency, cost and longevity. Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer (FRP) and Cold Room Panel (CRP) have distinct advantages and disadvantages. This analysis aims to guide decision-making in panel material selection.
of FRP is greater than that of CRP, which can be a factor for cost-conscious clients. 2. Repair costs: Repairs are often more expensive and time-consuming, leading to higher costs and extended downtime. 3. Mass considerations: While lightweight, FRP panels may still be heavier than CRP panels, potentially impacting payload efficiency.
Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Advantages 1. Thermal efficiency: FRP panels excel in thermal performance, largely influenced by high-quality foam, making them ideal for temperature control and energy efficiency. 2. Durability and impact resistance: FRP’s resilience to minor scrapes and impacts leads to reduced repairs and a longer lifespan for the truck body. 3. Internal space: Thinner FRP panels provide increased space, accommodating wider cargo. Disadvantages 1. Higher initial investment: The upfront cost
Cold Room Panels Advantages 1. Cost-effective: CRP’s affordability makes it appealing for businesses with limited budgets. 2. Ease/cost of repairs: CRP panels are quicker and cheaper to repair, minimising operational disruptions and reducing ownership costs. 3. Lightweight: Lighter CRP panels enhance vehicle performance and fuel efficiency. 4. Speed to market: CRP panels are more readily available, allowing for quicker deployment. Disadvantages 1. Thermal insulation: CRP panels offer
2025 BRISBANE TRUCK SHOW
effective, but inferior thermal insulation compared to FRP. 2. Durability: CRP panels can be slightly more susceptible to minor damage, though this can be mitigated with protective surfaces. 3. Space efficiency: The thicker nature of CRP panels decrease internal space.
Conclusion Choosing between FRP and CRP depends on specific operational need, budget constraints and performance requirements. Generally, we recommend FRP for vehicles over six-pallet size. However, CRP panels offer effective thermal performance at a lower cost and can be manufactured quickly. Evaluating these factors will help businesses select the most suitable material for their refrigerated transport needs. Contact the team at www.cooler.au or 07 3848 6979 for guidance on your build; we have vast design and manufacturing experience to support anyone with a fit-for-purpose asset.
PREVIEW MAGAZINE