EoYS21_MArch_7

S A R A H BISIGNANO Z A M L E R Columbia GSAPP M.Arch Graduate Portfolio, 2021

SYSTEMS

STRATEGIES

STUDIES

Grow Culebra

Staying Power: An Anti-Eviction Toolkit

Accumulation & Spread

Nameless Theater

critic: Karla Rothstein Core II

43

52

Advanced IV

with Nelson De Jesus Ubri critic: Laura Kurgan Advanced V

with Alina Abouelenin, Shuang Bi, & Camille Brustlein

04

17 Expo 2000 Redux

Archive of Absence

Public Escape

Marktown Futures

critic: Bika Rebek

critic: Karla Rothstein

critic: Stephanie Lin

critics: Justin G. Moore

ADR I

Core II

Core III

& Alicia O. Ajayi Advanced VI

45

56

12

The Way Things May Have Gone

with Melissa Chervin

critic: Stephanie Lin

critic: Galia Solomonoff

Core I

Core III

48

61

with Aria Ling critics: Richard Plunz & Doug Woodward

STRUCTURES

31

contents

Melrose Housing

contents

SYSTEMS Grow Culebra with Aria Ling critics: Richard Plunz & Doug Woodward Advanced IV

04 Public Escape critic: Stephanie Lin Core III

12

STRATEGIES

STUDIES

STRUCTURES

Grow Culebra with Aria Ling (UP) critics: Richard Plunz & Douglas Woodward client: Dulce del Rio & Mujeres de Isla advanced IV: Caribbean Reconnections, Spring 2020 additional work: Footprint: Carbon & Design, Fall 2020 Grow Culebra is sited on a small island off the east coast of Puerto Rico’s main land. Currently, Puerto Rico imports around 85% of their food and nearly all of Culebra’s food supply must pass through the main island first, which leads to many obstacles and risks in the food supply chain.

Additionally, the island’s landfill is at capacity and without other strategies in place, it will continue to overflow and pollute the land.

Presently, food production is a small but growing interest on the island so our proposal aims to provide Culebra with an adaptable and scalable strategy for a more sustainable food system. We conducted an island-wide analysis to identify prime agricultural land that is well suited to new farming ventures. To support this industry growth, we’ve designed several modules which can combine to make market halls, composting facilities, greenhouses, tool sheds, and gathering places. These combinations are then distributed around the island to make a system of hyper local food production and organic waste recycling centers that can grow and expand as community participation does.

4

study model: 3d print, paper, cardboard

Around 85% of Puerto Rico’s food is imported

As a result, the costs of basics are inflated and access to fresh food can be limited

Puerto Rico: $6.77

Dominican Republic: $4.08

Fresh Peaches Shelf Life: 3-4 days

The Jones Act “bars foreign vessels from shipping goods between U.S. ports [which] adds shipping

Contiguous US: $3.11

Canned Peaches Shelf Life: 1.5-2 years

Additionally, the supply chain is vulnerable to extreme weather

costs to imports of basic goods like food and fuel.” (Reuters, 2017) Jacksonville, FL

2,0

Food gets to the island by the ferry, which can’t run in inclement weather.

Sometimes, the island goes without imports for days or weeks surrounding a hurricane.

76

km

91

3k

m

72

1,8

San Juan, PR

3,

km

food system research

food system research

ubernamental d

eC ul

ra

Benjamín Riv erto era pu N o er

or

A

G ro

eb

C

t en

a ieg San Isidro

us Produce Surpl

od Pr e uc

Current Producers: Seva, Rancho Culebra

Pr od uc e

Proposed Market

Farms

st po m Co

Fo od Sc ra

ps

Homes & Restaurants

ste Yard Wa g

Neighborhoods

La

Proposed Compost Center

ina Lob a un

Playa Sardinas

II

Municipal Land Prime Farmland Conditional Farmland

proposed system diagram

mapping five proposed locations for Grow Culebra centers

Laguna Lobina Grow Culebra Center & component modules

Ma M Mar arket ket St Stal all a l

Mar Ma Mar a kket keett H Ha all ll

Co Com C ompos om o mpos o t Proc ost rro occeess o ss s iin ing ng n

Rees Res R estro tro troom rro oo om m / Wash Wa ash shing sh ng n g

Compos Com postin pos ting g

Gre Gr reenh enh nhous ous ou u e

Too T To oo ool Shed heed

Sh Sha haded deed ded d e Seati Seati Se a ng g

PRIME FARMLAND: CROPS & FRUIT TREES

BAMBOO FIELD

Laguna Lobina Grow Culebra Center, site plan

TO FIELDS/ MARKET

4.) STORE FINISHED COMPOST Dry product using sunlight or blowers, then bag or take to field for use

3.) MATURING BOX: 15-20 DAYS Boxes should be subdivided to allow for a consistent input stream

2.) COMPOST BOX: 45-50 DAYS Place mixed compost into box with aeration tubes

COLLECTED BIODEGRADABLE WASTE

ALLEY CROPPING & ROOT VEGETABLES STABILIZE SOIL & WITHSTAND EXTREME WEATHER

composting center, section

1.) SORT, SCREEN, AND WEIGH WASTE Remove any non-biodegradable waste.

Mix waste using a 25:1 carbon nitrogen ratio

composting center, sample plan

1.) TREAT WITH BORIC ACID, SPLIT BAMBOO INTO STRIPS

2.) PLANE STRIPS INTO RECTANGLES

3.) LAMINATE HORIZONTALLY, VERTICALLY, AND STACK

LAMINATED BAMBOO A MORE STORM-RESILIENT WOOD

market hall, section

market hall, sample plans in market & gathering configurations

800 kgCO2e

DIS TR I

N TIO BU

+F

CO NS T

B ER RY

T

CU

LEBR

A

CULEBRA, PR

SAN JUAN, PR

CEIBA, PR

30 kgCO2e

carbon footprint analysis, conventional wood

LL

> 0.01 kgCO2e

E

1,678 kgCO2e

CO NS T

EI

O

VI ON KS AC J TO UCK + TR

ION CT RU

> 0.01 kgCO2e

E UP + DRIV

JACKSONVILLE, FL

OC

ION CT RU

GEORGETOWN,GA

GT

MILLPORT, AL

+ TR U C KI N

TRA NS P

2,238 kgCO2e

2,238 kgCO2e

+D RIV ED OW N TH E ROA D

ING NAT MI A L

CULEBRA, PR

+ FRE IGHT SH IPP IN G

A

GROW ING &

NG LI

N TIO TA OR

N TIO TA OR

862.5 kgCO2e

ING EST RV HA

CULEBRA, PR

MI LL PO RT

LAMINATED BAMBOO: 862.5 kgCO2e

MILL ING &

TRA NS P

RU

TO

2,058 kgCO2e

AD RO THE

CULEBRA, PR

+T

CK

MI L

GROW ING &

CONVENTIONAL WOOD: 6,860 kgCO2e

ING EST RV HA

carbon footprint analysis, local bamboo

Public Escape critic: Stephanie Lin core I: Broadway Stories, Fall 2018 “...Something fundamental has changed in the way in which we see, or fail to see, the world.”

-Jonathan Crary, 24/7, Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep Public Escape focuses on the area of Broadway around Madison Square Park and its history as a center of image production. Currently, the neighborhood is characterized by a wide range of disparate programs, spanning from high end hotels to manufacturing.

Despite their adjacency, these programs largely operate without overlap. As a response to this disconnect, the intervention fills the space behind and between existing buildings with a network of pathways and flex spaces— referencing New York City fire escapes—in order to bridge the gap both physically and socially.

In conversation with the area’s legacy of image production, the pathways are shrouded in a system of cables that create a unique visual experience. The shifting alignment of cables obscure and reveal as one moves through the space, occasionally peeling back to allow views across the void and out into the city. This intervention aims to disrupt our current mode of perception and in this disruption encourage a searching to discover new spaces, new visual experiences, and new connections.

12

balcony system model: acrylic, string, chipboard

balcony system model: acrylic, string, chipboard

balcony system, section perspective

balcony system, sectional axon

1:1 material model: metal cable, wood frame

balcony system model: acrylic, string, chipboard

SYSTEMS

STRATEGIES Staying Power: An Anti-Eviction Toolkit with Nelson De Jesus Ubri critic: Laura Kurgan Advanced V

17 Marktown Futures critics: Justin G. Moore & Alicia O. Ajayi Advanced VI

31

STUDIES

STRUCTURES

Staying Power: An Anti-Eviction Toolkit with Nelson De Jesus Ubri critic: Laura Kurgan advanced V: Networks of Care, Fall 2020 additional work: Power Tools, Spring 2021 Since the start of the pandemic, several local and state governments have put temporary moratoriums on eviction and in September the CDC declared a nationwide “halt

45 FAMILIES EVICTED

in residential evictions to prevent the further spread of COVID-19.”

Within this context, Staying Power: An Anti-Eviction Toolkit, is a body of research and set of proposals aimed at fostering a network of care to both prevent evictions and empower 3 FAMILIES EVICTED

tenants who are in the process of being evicted. The project

2 FAMILIES EVICTED

analyzes systems of eviction before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and used nationwide health data to identify areas of extreme vulnerability. Building on this research, Staying Power offers a set of interconnecting action oriented

7 FAMILIES EVICTED

proposals designed specifically for the Bronx.

2 FAMILIES EVICTED

The set of proposals, which respond to identified ‘leverage points,’ includes activating existing care networks with

2 FAMILIES EVICTED

Community Health Workers, utilizing empty storefronts for organizing and tenant-landlord resolution, deploying

4 FAMILIES EVICTED

4 FAMILIES EVICTED

an information campaign to better connect tenants and available resources, and an installing an exhibit of interviews

3 FAMILIES EVICTED

and collected data to raise awareness of the risks of eviction.

17

area of focus map, 2019 eviction data

JUDGE’S ENTRANCE

JUDGE

JURY ENTRANCE

WITNESS

PRISONER’S ENTRANCE

JURY

COURT CLERK

PLANTIFF (LANDLORD)

DEFENDANT (TENANT)

JUDGE In most eviction cases, the Judge will make the verdict

JURY

COURT

COURT PUBLIC

PUBLIC

Most cases will be decided by the Judge, unless a Jury is requested prior to the trial

WITNESS STAND

PLAINTIFF (LANDLORD) . /# ' $)/$Ȃя /# ' ) '*- # . /# burden of proof and will generally hire an attorney

PUBLIC

CONFERENCE ROOM

COURT CLERK Court Clerks maintain records and swear in jury members, witnesses and defendants

JURY’S ENTRANCE

Housing Inspectors, Super Indendants, and Neighbors are all commonly witnesses

JUDGE’S ENTRANCE

CONFERENCE ROOM

TENANT (DEFENDANT) In most instances, the Defendant is not provided a court appointed attorney

PUBLIC ENTRANCE

typical court room analysis

typical court room analysis

state by state eviction time line policy comparison

state by state eviction moratorium time line

Bronx County, New York

Shelby County, Tennessee Barnwell County, South Carolina Pima County, Arizona

Overlapping Vulnerabilities

statewide mapping of overlapping vulnerability

URBAN SUBURBAN SUBURBAN RURAL

NON-CORE / RURAL

vulnerable counties sorted by urban classification

MICROPOLITAN

SMALL METRO

MEDIUM METRO

LARGE FRINGE METRO

LARGE CENTRAL METRO

Bronx County - Census Tract 53

Bronx County, NY

Shelby County - Census Tract 220.22

Shelby County, SC

Pima County - Census Tract 26.03

Pima County, AZ

Barnwell County - Census Tract 9703 Barnwell County, SC

Hispanic

African American

White

Native American

No Data

four case study counties with census tract level demographic analysis

four case study counties with census tract level demographic analysis

Leverage Points

Proposals

Before evictions begin

Existing Network of Care with Community Health Workers

When tenants are first confronted with an eviction

Information Network

As a tenant goes through the court process

Resolution Network

Raising awareness of eviction risks

toolkit summary

Memory Network

memory network at the River Park Towers

neighborhood node & transportation analysis map

area node & transportation analysis map

#$"# /- Ȃ$ - at schools

at transit stops

/ - .*0- )/ -.

at housing

STOP STOP STOP STO EVICTION P EVICTION EVICTIO EVICTION N TENANT’S RIGHTS GUIDE

DECL COUR ARE T ING HOUSIN COVID-19 HARD GUIDE TO HOUS SHIP G ADVOCACY GUIDE

/ '$ - $ . at housing court

/ *((0)$/4 )/ -.

STOP EVICTION

STOP EVICTION

DECLARE COVID-19 HARDSHIP

HOUSING ADVOCACY GUIDE

information campaign: sample pamphlets

at cultural institutions

STOP EVICTION

STOP EVICTION

TENANT’S RIGHTS GUIDE

GUIDE TO HOUSING COURT

information campaign: NYC-wide sample posters

information campaign: sample poster

information campaign: sample deployment locations

resolution network sample plan

resolution network in empty storefront

memory network in The Bronx Museum of the Arts

memory network

Marktown Futures critics: Justin G. Moore & Alicia O. Ajayi advanced VI: Place Keeping & Mark Making, Spring 2021 Marktown is a historic community in the heart of the Indiana Harbor. It’s completely surrounded by heavy industry (oil & gas, and steel), exposing its residents to unsafe levels of pollution. Since 2013, BP has been buying and demolishing residential property in the neighborhood, exacerbating displacement in the community. If left unchecked, BP will continue to degrade the quality of life for Marktown Residents and slowly but surely, erase their neighborhood.

Marktown Futures seeks justice for a community at the intersection of environmental and economic displacement.

The project is strategy, not solution, based and aims to facilitate the power of choice in a community that is currently running out of options. The proposals activate environmentally challenged spaces, hold the community’s industrial neighbors accountable, and enable sustained community connection at a variety of timescales (today and in the future).

The tactics consider the health risks of staying and the social risks of leaving and range from explicitly spatial (utilizing vacant homes and the space between vacant homes as gathering, organizing, and community documentation space) to economic policy (adapting Indiana’s Qualified Allocation Plan for displacement funding from BP). This set of tools aims to facilitate action today that can enable a totally alternate—but possible—future. A future in which we value the health of communities over our dependency on oil and gas.

31

US Locations of the Top 60 Worst Polluters

Since 2001, BP has paid

$27,828,442,980

LyondellBasell Boeing Huntsman BASF Dow Inc. Celanese General Electric Terumo Eastman Chemical Royal Dutch Shell Ecolab National Oilwell Varco Berkshire Hathaway Mitsui Kubota TMS International Ashland Inc. Northrop Grumman Albemarle SPX FLOW Exxon Mobil Howmet Aerospace Rio Tinto Koch Industries Becton Dickinson Kennametal Daikin Occidental Petroleum Akzo Nobel Evonik Industries

Freeport-McMoRan Marathon Petroleum Valero Energy Edwards Lifesciences Linde Phillips 66 Solvay Ametek Chevron ArcelorMittal Lincoln Electric Holdings Tenneco Emerson Electric Allegheny Technologies Pentair Carpenter Technology Westlake Chemical Kingspan PLC Parker-Hannifin O’Neal Industries Middleby PBF Energy Baxter International United States Steel American Electric Power BP Carlyle Group PPG Industries TechnipFMC Deere

in environment-related offenses

US locations of top 60 polluters

MARKTOWN

TOWN OWNERSHIP, 2012

Industrial Ownership, 2020

BP Amoco (BP) Arcelormittal Isplat Inland Steel

TOWN OWNERSHIP, 2020

Privately Owned

industrial land ownership, 2020

City of East Chicago

BP

BP (demolished)

town ownership 2012-2020

47% of Marktown Parcels are owned by BP or East Chicago

Despite listing on the National Register of Historic Places

Asthma Emergency Department Visits, 2009

1 in 8 Residents Reported having Cancer MARKTOWN

59.4 - 87.1 43.5 - 59.3 30.8 - 43.4 1.2 - 30.7 unstable

BP has paid over

BP has demolished

Lake County residents have the

$1,100,000

50 HOMES

8th highest

for property in Marktown

since 2014

risk of cancer in the US

the state average

Hoosier Environmental Council

IHME & ISDH

outstanding economic conditions

Lake County Asthma Rates are

1.8 times

outstanding health conditions

Short Term Lodging

Access to Health Resources

Short Term Lodging

Historic/Community Documentation

Energy Generation

Remediation Planting Y DA TO

Displacement & Endangerment Funding

Industrial Town Alliance

Gathering/Organizing Space

Homecoming Celebration

Today Strategies

proposal summary for today

Recreation

Managed Forestry

Homecoming Celebration

Gathering/Organizing Space

Future Strategies

proposal summary for the future

ACTIVATING QUADPLEXES DOCUMENTING MARKTOWN

ACCESS TO CARE

SUPPORT FOR CELEBRATION

A PLACE TO COME HOME TO

INDIANA QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN For all Developments that will impact existing tenants, provide a displacement/relocation plan.

Required

Documentation:

A

detailed

displacement/

relocation plan that includes all of the following information must be submitted in Tab L: •

Any potential permanent, temporary or economic displacement/relocation issues;

• •

The number of current tenants to be relocated; Where the tenants will be relocated during the rehabilitation and for the length of time;

•

How displacement/relocation will be minimized and how relocation expenses will be paid for if they are incurred;

•

Displacement/relocation assistance plan (e.g. Who will get assistance? How much assistance will they receive? When and how will they receive their assistance? Who will provide advisory services to those displaced?); and

•

Anticipated relocation budget with itemized expenses.

Note: Relocation expenses must also be listed in the development budget in Form A.

proposal summary for today

Marktown center (today proposal)

Marktown center (today proposal), plans

Marktown lodge (today proposal)

Marktown lodge (today proposal), plans

SUSTAINED ACTIVATION STORY SHARING

SUPPORT FOR CELEBRATION

A PLACE TO HOST VISITORS

ENERGY GENERATION / RECREATION

STRATEGIC PLANTING

proposal summary for the future

Marktown center (future proposal)

Marktown center (future proposal), plans

Marktown lodge (future proposal)

Marktown lodge (future proposal), plans

SYSTEMS

STRATEGIES

STUDIES Accumulation & Spread critic: Karla Rothstein Core II

43

Expo 2000 Redux critic: Bika Rebek ADR I

45

The Way Things May Have Gone critic: Stephanie Lin Core I

48

STRUCTURES

Accumulation & Spread critic: Karla Rothstein core II: Archive of Absence, Spring 2019 This series of material studies examines patterns of spread and accumulation utilizing filament, acrylic, metal fasteners, and liquid plastic. On the left is an operative analysis of liquid spread and accumulation.

The following iterations range from explorations of string fields to studies of liquid spreading. The results are singular moments of movement frozen in time. The following exploration is formal, spatial, and interrogates grouping and intersection as an organizational logic.

43

material models: string, acrylic, liquid plastic, metal fasteners

Expo 2000 Redux critic: Bika Rebek visual studies: ADR I, Fall 2018 Since it’s debut at the 2000 World Exposition in Hannover, the MVRDV Netherlands Pavilion has fallen into disrepair.

As the firm and a new client aim to adapt the structure for new uses, this study explores representational styles and their relationship to design. The drawing set is formatted as a call for proposals, with a combined drawing borrowing representational styles for each distinct level of the pavilion.

In translation to three dimensions, the model explores different methods of making and how each method lends itself to certain formal outcomes.

MVRDV pavilion r 45

MVRDV pavilion reimagined through famous architect’s drawing styles

imagined call for proposals for MVRDV pavilion repurposing

MVRDV pavilion model details

MVRDV pavilion levels as different methods of making

MVRDV pavilion model

The Way Things May Have Gone critic: Stephanie Lin core I: Broadway Stories, Fall 2018 This series of drawings investigates the possible realities behind the 1987 film The Way Things Go, by Peter Fischli & David Weiss.

While the film is edited to appear as seamless and independent as possible, in reality the artists complied the sequence from many takes and segments. Exploring methods of representation and translation, each drawing imagines these potential breaks in the film’s highly cultivated chain.

48

camera & frames, projected

simultaneous possibilities fragment

simultaneous possibilities

mapping camera & action

moment of imprecision

SYSTEMS

STRATEGIES

STUDIES

STRUCTURES Nameless Theater with Alina Abouelenin, Shuang Bi, & Camille Brustlein

52

Archive of Absence critic: Karla Rothstein Core II

56

Melrose Housing with Melissa Chervin critic: Galia Solomonoff Core III

61

Nameless Theater with Alina Abouelenin, Shuang Bi, & Camille Brustlein course leads: Sarrah Khan & Gabby Brainard tech II & IV: Fall 2019 The Nameless Theater is a theater and gathering space adjacent to Transmitter Park in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. The building is comprised of three main forms, the plinth, the main theater, and the intersecting black box theater volume.

Much of the design was driven by an attempt to reduce the footprint of this traditionally resource intense building type.

Strategies included reducing glazing, raising the ground floor, including a biosolar green roof, and working with low carbon footprint building materials.

52

sustainability diagram

$

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢳

$

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢳

$

$

$

6

6

$

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶 䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

%

% 䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

&

䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

& $

䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣄䣎䣃䣅䣍䢢䣄䣑䣚䢢䣖䣊䣇䣃䣖䣇䣔

䣆䣐

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣃

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢 䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

$

$

¡

䣗䣒

䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

$

䢳䢹䢻䢸䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

¡

$

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵 䣇䣎䣇䣘

䣇䣎䣇䣘

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵 䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵

$

'

$

$ )

' 䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣄

䣆䣐 䣗䣒

$ )

$

$ )

$

(

(

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢 䣃䣔䣄䣑䣔䢢䣒䣋䣖䢢䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

)

)

*

*

䣑䣨䣨䣫䣥䣧

䢳䢻䢸䢲䢢䣨䣶䤓

$ 6

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢 䣃䣗䣆䣋䣖䣑䣔䣋䣗䣏䢢䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

+

$

6

+

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑 䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

䢴 䣃䢹䢳䢲

䢴 䣃䢹䢳䢲

䣈䣔䣇䣋䣉䣊䣖䢢 䣇䣎䣇䣘

,

,

䣒䣘䢢䣒䣃䣐䣇䣎䣕䢢䣕䣈䢢䢪䢳䢷䢮䢹䢸䢸䢢䣕䣈䢫

䣅䣱䣰䣨䣧䣴䣧䣰䣥䣧 䣔䣱䣱䣯

䣑䣨䣨䣫䣥䣧䢢䣘䣫䣧䣹䣫䣰䣩䢢䣒䣮䣣䣶䣨䣱䣴䣯

䢷䢵䢷䢢䣨䣶䤓

䢴䢺䢺䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣅

$

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣆

䣗䣒

䣆䣐

䣇䣮䣧䣥䣶䣴䣫䣥䣣䣮 䣋䣰䣥䣱䣯䣫䣰䣩 䣕䣧䣴䣸䣫䣥䣧

䢳䢸䢴䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣆䣐

$

-

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢲

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢲

/HYHO ) )

522)

$

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢳

6

$

$

$

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢳

$

$

6

83

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶 䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

䣖䣋䣅䣍䣇䣖䢢䣄䣑䣑䣖䣊

䢶䢲䢢䣨䣶䤓

%

䣇䣐䣖䣔䣛

䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

%

&

&

䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

$

䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 ¡

䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

$

$

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣃

䣆䣐

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣃

$

$

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢 䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

$

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵

䣇䣎䣇䣘

$ )

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵 䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵

䣇䣎䣇䣘

$

'

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣄 䣄䣑䣚䢢䣑䣈䣈䣋䣅䣇 䢪䣅䣑䣗䣐䣖䣇䣔䢫

䣗䣒

䣅䣑䣗䣐䣖䣇䣔

䣅䣊䣃䣐䣉䣇䢱 䣏䣃䣍䣇䣗䣒 䣕䣒䣃䣅䣇

$ )

$ )

( 䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢 䣃䣔䣄䣑䣔䢢䣒䣋䣖䢢䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

䣔䣑䣑䣈䢢䣕䣖䣃䣉䣇䢢䣕䣖䣑䣔䣃䣉䣇

䣕䣊䣑䣙䣇䣔

䢷䢶䢶䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣃䣔䣄䣑䣔䢢䣒䣋䣖 䣒䣇䣔䣕䣑䣐䣃䣎 䣊䣑䣕䣖䣋䣐䣉 䣕䣒䣃䣅䣇

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣄

$

$

(

䣆䣐

'

)

)

$

$ ) )

䣇䣎䣇䣘

䣆䣐

䣇䣎䣇䣘

$

¡

䣗䣒

䣃䣊䣗

䣅䣑䣗䣐䣖䣇䣔

䣕䣊䣑䣙䣇䣔

䣅䣣䣶䢢䣙䣣䣮䣭

䣏䣃䣋䣐䢢䣕䣖䣃䣉䣇

䣕䣋䣉䣊 䣖䣎䣋䣐 䣇

䢳䢼䢳䢴

*

䣕䣊䣑䣙䣇䣔

䢴䢹䢸䢲䢢䣨䣶䤓

䢾䢳䢼䢳䢴

䣅䣊䣃䣐䣉䣇䢱 䣏䣃䣍䣇䣗䣒 䣕䣒䣃䣅䣇

䣅䣑䣗䣐䣖䣇䣔

䣒䣇䣔䣕䣑䣐䣃䣎 䣊䣑䣕䣖䣋䣐䣉 䣕䣒䣃䣅䣇

*

䣆䣴䣧䣵䣵䣫䣰䣩䢢䢳 䣙䣃䣔䣆䣔䣑䣄䣇䢢䣔䣃䣅䣍䣕

䢷䢵䢲䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣙䣃䣔䣆䣔䣑䣄䣇䢢䣔䣃䣅䣍䣕

6 $

䢶䢳䢺䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢 䣃䣗䣆䣋䣖䣑䣔䣋䣗䣏䢢䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

䣇 䣖䣎䣋䣐 䣕䣋䣉䣊

6 $

+

+

䣕䣊䣑䣙䣇䣔

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢䣕䣖䣃䣉䣇 䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

䣑䣒䣇䣐䢢䣖䣑 䣄䣇䣎䣑䣙

䣅䣑䣗䣐䣖䣇䣔

䢴䢹䢶䢢䣨䣶䤓

䢴 䣃䢹䢳䢲

䣋䣐䣅䣑䣏䣋䣐䣉 䣕䣇䣔䣘䣋䣅䣇

䢴 䣃䢹䢳䢲

䣕䣧䣥䣷䣴䣫䣶䣻

䣈䣔䣇䣋䣉䣊䣖䢢 䣇䣎䣇䣘

䣈䣔䣇䣋䣉䣊䣖䢢 䣇䣎䣇䣘

䢷䢺䢢䣨䣶䤓

, 䣎䣱䣣䣦䣫䣰䣩䢢䣆䣱䣥䣭

䢴䢺䢷䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣈䣫䣴䣧䢢䣒䣷䣯䣲

83

䣙䣣䣶䣧䣴䢢䣏䣧䣶䣧䣴 䣉䣣䣵䢢䣏䣧䣶䣧䣴

䢳䢸䢸䢢䣨䣶䤓

$

䣗䣒

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣅

䣗䣒

䢳䢲䢳䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣆

䢺䢳䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣇䣮䣧䣥䣶䣴䣫䣥䣣䣮 䣋䣰䣥䣱䣯䣫䣰䣩 䣕䣧䣴䣸䣫䣥䣧

䣋䣖䢢䣋䣰䣥䣱䣯䣫䣰䣩 䣕䣧䣴䣸䣫䣥䣧

䣇䣮䣧䣥䣶䣴䣫䣥䣣䣮 䣋䣰䣥䣱䣯䣫䣰䣩 䣕䣧䣴䣸䣫䣥䣧

,

$

䢳䢲䢳䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣕䣖䣃䣋䣔䢢䣆

䢳䢸䢸䢢䣨䣶䤓

䣆䣐

䣒䣘䢢䣋䣐䣘䣇䣔䣖䣇䣔䢢䢪䣃䣅䢢䣖䣑䢢䣆䣅䢫

䢻䢻䢢䣨䣶䤓

-

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢲

/HYHO ) )

level 1 & level 2, plans

/HYHO ) )

䢳 䣃䢹䢳䢲

level 3 & roof, plans

0,1

䣅䣗䣔䣖䣃䣋䣐䢢䣙䣃䣎䣎䢢䣔䣃䣋䣎䣋䣐䣉䢽䢢䣕䣇䣇䢢䣃䢹䢳䢴

䣒䣘䢢䣕䣑䣎䣃䣔䢢䣒䣃䣐䣇䣎

䣑䣗䣖䣕䣋䣆䣇

䢸䢤䢢䣇䣐䣉䣋䣐䣇䣇䣔䣇䣆䢢䣕䣑䣋䣎 䢴䣚䢴䢢䣅䣑䣐䣅䣔䣇䣖䣇䢢䣒䣃䣘䣇䣔 䣒䣃䣘䣇䣔䢢䣒䣇䣆䣇䣕䣖䣃䣎

䢶䢤䢢䣉䣔䣃䣘䣇䣎 䣈䣋䣎䣖䣇䣔䢢䣈䣃䣄䣔䣋䣅

䣕䣎䣑䣒䣇䢢䣖䣑䢢䣆䣔䣃䣋䣐

䣍䣋䣕䣕䣋䣐䣉䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐

䣒䣔䣑䣖䣇䣅䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣄䣑䣃䣔䣆 䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔

䣈䣔䣋䣖䣖䣇䣆䢢䣉䣔䣃䣆䣋䣇䣐䣖䢽䢢䣕䣇䣇䢢䣈䢳䢳䢳

䣔䣋䣉䣋䣆䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐䢽䢢䣕䣎䣑䣒䣇䢢䣖䣑䢢䣆䣔䣃䣋䣐

䢸䢤䢢䣅䣑䣐䣅䣔䣇䣖䣇䢢䣑䣐䢢䣏䣇䣖䣃䣎䢢䣆䣇䣅䣍

䣘䣇䣔䣖䣋䣅䣃䣎䢢䣃䣖䣖䣃䣅䣊䣏䣇䣐䣖䢢䣄䣔䣃䣅䣍䣇䣖 䣒䣔䣑䣖䣇䣅䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣄䣑䣃䣔䣆 䣔䢯䢵䢲䢢䣔䣋䣉䣋䣆䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔 䢴䢶䢤䣙䣃䣈䣈䣎䣇䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄

䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣖䣔䣗䣕䣕䢮䢢䣕䣇䣇䢢䣕䢵䢲䢳 䣙䢴䢳䣚䢷䢷䢢䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣉䣋䣔䣆䣇䣔 䣚䣒䣕䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

䣙䣃䣎䣎䢢䣖䣑䢢䣔䣑䣑䣈

䣕䣗䣔䣈䣃䣅䣇䢢䣏䣑䣗䣐䣖䣇䣆䢢䣅䣃䣐䢢䣎䣋䣉䣊䣖

䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣆䣗䣅䣖䢢䣊䣃䣐䣉䣇䣔

䣋䣐䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣇䣏䣄䣇䣆䣆䣇䣆䢢䣅䣑䣐䣐䣇䣅䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣒䣎䣃䣖䣇䢮䢢 䣕䣇䣇䢢䣕䢵䢲䢳

䣊䣇䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉䢢䢱䢢䣅䣑䣑䣎䣋䣐䣉䢢䣆䣗䣅䣖

䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣆䣔䣑䣒䣒䣇䣆䢢䣅䣇䣋䣎䣋䣐䣉䢢䣅䣎䣋䣒䣕 䣆䣔䣑䣒䣒䣇䣆䢢䣅䣇䣋䣎䣋䣐䣉

䣋䣐䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣑䣗䣖䣕䣋䣆䣇

䢸䢤䢢䣅䣑䣐䣅䣔䣇䣖䣇䢢䣑䣐䢢䣏䣇䣖䣃䣎䢢䣆䣇䣅䣍 䢷䢱䢺䢤䢢䣉䣙䣄 䢺䢤䢢䣅䣑䣐䣅䢰 䣆䣇䣐䣕䣉䣎䣃䣕䣕䢢䣕䣊䣇䣃䣖䣊䣋䣐䣉

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵

䣘䣇䣔䣖䣋䣅䣃䣎䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐 䣃䣖䣖䣃䣅䣊䣏䣇䣐䣖䢢䣒䣎䣃䣖䣇䢢䢨䢢䣃䣐䣅䣊䣑䣔䣕 䣘䣇䣔䣖䣋䣅䣃䣎䢢䣃䣖䣖䣃䣅䣊䣏䣇䣐䣖䢢䣄䣔䣃䣅䣍䣇䣖

䣃䣋䣔䢢䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔

䣕䣏䣑䣍䣇䢢䣕䣇䣃䣎

䣚䣒䣕䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐

䣊䣑䣔䣋䣜䣑䣐䣖䣃䣎䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐

䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣊䣃䣖䢢䣅䣊䣃䣐䣐䣇䣎 䣖䣇䣔䣔䣃䣅䣑䣖䣖䣃䢢䣕䣋䣆䣋䣐䣉 䣖䣇䣔䣔䣃䣅䣑䣖䣖䣃䢢䣕䣋䣆䣋䣐䣉䢢䣄䣇䣛䣑䣐䣆 䣙䢴䢳䣚䢷䢷䢢䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣄䣇䣃䣏 䣅䣑䣐䣐䣇䣅䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣒䣎䣃䣖䣇 䣙䢴䢳䣚䢷䢷䢢䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣉䣋䣔䣆䣇䣔

䣖䣑䣒䣒䣋䣐䣉䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄 䣔䣃䣆䣋䣃䣐䣖䢢䣊䣇䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉䢱䣅䣑䣑䣎䣋䣐䣉 䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔

䣚䣒䣕䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䣔䢯䢵䢲䢢䣔䣋䣉䣋䣆䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐

䣆䣔䣑䣒䣒䣇䣆䢢䣅䣇䣋䣎䣋䣐䣉䢢䣊䣃䣐䣉䣇䣔

䢴䢶䢤䣙䣃䣈䣈䣎䣇䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄

䣑䣗䣖䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣆䣗䣅䣖䢢䣊䣃䣐䣉䣇䣔 䣊䣇䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉䢢䢱䢢䣅䣑䣑䣎䣋䣐䣉䢢䣆䣗䣅䣖 䣆䣔䣑䣒䣒䣇䣆䢢䣅䣇䣋䣎䣋䣐䣉

䣙䣃䣎䣎䢢䣖䣑䢢䣈䣎䣑䣑䣔䢢䣂䢢䣎䣇䣘䣇䣎䢢䢴 䣅䣑䣐䣅䣔䣇䣖䣇䢢䣅䣑䣎䣗䣏䣐䢢䣄䣇䣛䣑䣐䣆

䢷䢤䢢䣅䣑䣐䣅䣔䣇䣖䣇䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄䢢䣑䣐䢢䣉䣔䣃䣆䣇 䢷䢱䢺䢤䢢䣉䣙䣄 䢺䢤䣅䣑䣐䣅䢰 䣆䣇䣐䣕䣉䣎䣃䣕䣕䢢䣕䣊䣇䣃䣖䣊䣋䣐䣉 䣃䣋䣔䢢䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔 䣚䣒䣕䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣊䣃䣖䢢䣅䣊䣃䣐䣐䣇䣎

䣒䣎䣃䣜䣃䢢䣃䣕䣕䣇䣏䣄䣎䣛 䣒䣑䣔䣑䣗䣕䢢䣒䣃䣘䣇䣔䣕 䣉䣔䣃䣘䣇䣎䢢䣄䣇䣆䣆䣋䣐䣉䢢䣎䣃䣛䣇䣔 䣕䣖䣔䣗䣅䣖䣗䣔䣃䣎䢢䣎䣃䣛䣇䣔䢼䢢䣐䣑䢰䢢䢷䢹䢢䣕䣖䣑䣐䣇 䣗䣐䣆䣇䣔䣆䣔䣃䣋䣐

䣈䣑䣗䣐䣆䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣖䣑䢢䣈䣎䣑䣑䣔

typical wall section at terracotta

overhang wall sections at waffle slab

䣔䣑䣑䣈䢢䣆䣇䣅䣍䢢䣙䣋䣖䣊䢢䣒䣃䣘䣇䣔䣕

䣑䣗䣖䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣅䣑䣐䣖䣋䣐䣗䣑䣗䣕䢢䣅䣗䣔䣖䣃䣋䣐䢢䣙䣃䣎䣎䢢 䣔䣃䣋䣎䣋䣐䣉䢽䢢䣏䣋䣐䢢䢶䢴䢤䢢䣕䣇䣇䢢䣃䢹䢳䢴

䣔䣃䣆䣋䣃䣐䣖䢢䣊䣇䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉䢱䣅䣑䣑䣎䣋䣐䣉

䣒䣃䣘䣇䣔䢢䣒䣇䣆䣇䣕䣖䣃䣎䣕

䢶䢤䢢䣖䣑䣒䣒䣋䣐䣉䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄

䣋䣐䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣅䣑䣐䣖䢰䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐

䣃䣋䣔䢱䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔

䣅䣎䣑䣕䣗䣔䣇䢢䣒䣎䣃䣖䣇

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

䣃䣴䣥䣪䣫䣶䣧䣥䣶

䣔䢯䢵䢲䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䣍䣋䣕䣕䣋䣐䣉䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐

䣋䣉䣗䢢䣙䣋䣖䣊䢢䣉䣔䣃䣆䣋䣇䣐䣖䢢䣈䣔䣋䣖

䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣕䣶䣴䣷䣥䣶䣷䣴䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣕䣎䣑䣒䣇䢢䣖䣑䢢䣆䣔䣃䣋䣐

䣘䣇䣔䣖䣋䣅䣃䣎䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐 䢴䢶䢤䢢䣙䣃䣈䣈䣎䣇䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄

䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣏䣧䣥䣪䣣䣰䣫䣥䣣䣮䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣈䣃䣄䣔䣇䣇䣍䣃䢯䣖䣋䣏䢢䣙䣃䣕䣊䣇䣔

䣒䣔䣇䣖䣇䣐䣕䣋䣑䣐䣇䣆䢢䣄䣑䣎䣖

䣈䣔䣋䣖䣖䣇䣆䢢䣒䣃䣐䣇䣎

䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶 䣇䣰䣥䣮䣱䣵䣷䣴䣧䢢䣅䣱䣰䣵䣷䣮䣶䣣䣰䣶

䣈䣃䣄䣔䣇䣇䣍䣃䢯䣖䣋䣏䢢䣕䣖䣔䣗䣅䣖䣗䣔䣃䣎䢢䣖䣊䣇䣔䣏䣃䣎䢢䣄䣔䣇䣃䣍䢼䢢䢳䢤䢢䣒䣃䣆 䣄䣔䣇䣃䣍䢼䢢䢳䢤䢢䣒䣃䣆

䣘䣇䣔䣖䣋䣅䣃䣎䢢䣃䣖䣖䣃䣅䣊䣏䣇䣐䣖䢢䣄䣔䣃䣅䣍䣇䣖

䣑䣗䣖䣆䣑䣑䣔䢢䣒䣎䣃䣜䣃䢢䣙䣋䣖䣊䢢 䣒䣑䣔䣑䣗䣕䢢䣒䣃䣘䣇䣔䣕

䣒䣔䣑䣖䣇䣅䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣄䣑䣃䣔䣆 䣃䣋䣔䢱䣘䣃䣒䣑䣔䢢䣄䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔 䣔䢯䢵䢲䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䢴䢶䢤䣙䣃䣈䣈䣎䣇䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵

䣆䣧䣵䣫䣩䣰䣧䣴䣵

䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐

䣑䣗䣖䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣊䣑䣔䣋䣜䣑䣐䣖䣃䣎䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐

䣋䣐䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣇䣎䣃䣕䣖䣑䣏䣇䣔䣋䣅䢢䣅䣑䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉 䣕䣏䣑䣍䣇䢢䣕䣇䣃䣎 䣅䣎䣑䣕䣗䣔䣇䢢䣒䣋䣇䣅䣇

:$))/( 6/$% &2/801 7+(50$/ %5($.

&857$,1 :$// $7 522)

0(7$/ 678'

0(7$/ 678'

+$7 &+$11(/

7<3( ; *:%

0(7$/ 678'

7<3( ; *:%

+$7 &+$11(/

7<3( ; *:%

7<3( ; *:%

䣘䣇䣔䣖䣋䣅䣃䣎䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐

7<3( ; *:%

7<3( ; *:%

䣉䣈䣔䣅䢢䣅䣃䣒

&08

䣅䣑䣐䣖䢰䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䣍䣋䣕䣕䣋䣐䣉䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐

䣋䣐䣕䣋䣆䣇

䣅䣎䣑䣕䣗䣔䣇䢢䣒䣋䣇䣅䣇 䣕䣏䣑䣍䣇䢢䣕䣇䣃䣎 䣇䣎䣃䣕䣖䣑䣏䣇䣔䣋䣅䢢䣅䣑䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉

䣙䢳䢶䣚䢳䢲䢲䢢䣕䣖䣇䣇䣎䢢䣅䣑䣎䣗䣏䣐 䢳䢱䢴䢤䢢䣉䣛䣒䢢䣄䣑䣃䣔䣆 䢶䢲䣏䣏䢢䣖䣊䣋䣅䣍䢢䣐䣄䣍䢢 䣖䣇䣔䣔䣃䣅䣑䣖䣖䣃䢢䣖䣋䣎䣇 䣕䣉䣃䢯䣃䣎䣗䣏䢰䣇䣚䣖䣔䣗䣆䣇䣆䢢 䣅䣃䣔䣔䣋䣇䣔䢢䣖䣔䣃䣅䣍

䣉䣔䣃䣆䣋䣇䣐䣖䢢䣈䣔䣋䣖

䢵䢤䢢䣔䣋䣉䣋䣆䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䣊䣑䣔䣋䣜䣑䣐䣖䣃䣎䢢䣏䣗䣎䣎䣋䣑䣐 䣅䣎䣑䣕䣗䣔䣇䢢䣒䣋䣇䣅䣇

䣃䣎䣋䣉䣐

䣈䣋䣐䣋䣕䣊䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄 䣔䣃䣆䣋䣃䣐䣖䢢䣊䣇䣃䣖䣋䣐䣉䢱䢢䣅䣑䣑䣎䣋䣐䣉䢢䣅䣑䣋䣎䣕 䣔䢯䢵䢲䢢䣋䣐䣕䣗䣎䣃䣖䣋䣑䣐 䢴䢶䢤䣙䣃䣈䣈䣎䣇䢢䣕䣎䣃䣄

䣅䣑䣔䣇䢢䣙䣃䣎䣎䢢䢯 䢴䣊䣔

䣒䣃䣔䣖䣋䣖䣋䣑䣐䢢䣙䣃䣎䣎䢢䢯 䢴䣊䣔

䣑䣗䣖䣕䣋䣆䣇

5$7(' :$//6

architectural details

&857$,1 :$// $7 :$))/( 6/$% )/225

wall axon details

Archive of Absence critic: Karla Rothstein core II: Archive of Absence, Spring 2019 The Archive of Absence is comprised of a series of compressive and expansive interconnecting spaces that accommodate collective and individual remembrance, challenging the conception that sites of interment must be singular or static. The archive serves as a testing ground for sustainably returning our bodies to the earth. The interior houses ceremony spaces of varying scale, halls which hold vessels for anaerobic decomposition, niches for individual contemplation, and a laboratory to monitor the health of this potentially limitless system. The exterior, arranged as connected and semi-enclosed courtyards and roofscapes, features landscaped areas which receive the organic remains. The result is a network of space and landscape that creates intersecting frameworks of movement and repose, spreading and accumulating over time.

56

study models: PLA, chipboard, paint

building plan

carve

offset

enclose

smooth

Wall with Perforation

wall detail study

wall detail model: resin, PLA, chipboard, paint

building interiors, decomposition hall, remembrance walls

roof plan, building section

courtyard, winter

courtyard, spring

Melrose Housing with Melissa Chervin critic: Galia Solomonoff core III: Housing the Commons, Fall 2020 The interlacing, necklace like form of the Melrose Apartments began with the idea of providing a network of shared amenities and services to better foster connections between residents. 5 circular joints located at the site’s corners house the various shared amenities and the main stairs and elevators. These shared spaces vary from laundry, maintenance, and daycare services to more luxurious amenities such as gyms, libraries, and offices. The 9 story apartment building consists of 270 units making up the shifting bars that connect the joints. The building encourages sharing on a smaller scale providing each bar of units with a ten foot wide outdoor corridor with the aim of doubling as a front lawn space for each cluster of units. On the unit scale, sharing can be found in the various ‘dorm style’ apartment types containing anywhere from 5 to 6 bedrooms allowing for the Melrose Apartments to sleep a projected number of 720 residents.

61

building axonometric

units & front lawns, section perspective

units & communal space detail model

ground floor plan

level 1 floor plan

level 4 floor plan

level 5 floor plan

front lawn & shared amenity

units & front lawn detail model

TYPE C: 1-level / 1 bed

Level 3

Level 7

Level 9 TYPE A: 2-level / 6 bed

TYPE H: 2-level / 3 bed

Level 2

floor plans

Level 6

TYPE F: 1-level / 1 bed

TYPE B: 1-level / 1 bed

TYPE I: 2-level / 2 bed

TYPE d: 2-level / 3 bed

TYPE E: 1-level / 1 bed

TYPE G: 2-level / 5 bed

TYPE J: 1-level / 2 bed

TYPE K: 2-level / 2 bed

TYPE L: 2-level / 2 bed

Level 8

unit type plans

operation of detail model

courtyard from front lawn

SYSTEMS

STRATEGIES

STUDIES

STRUCTURES

Sarah Bisignano Zamler Columbia GSAPP 2021