Frankston YOUR GUIDE TO WHAT’S ON THIS WEEKEND FOR PENINSULA FAMILIES FACEBOOK:
peninsulakids.com.au mornpenkids
An independent voice for the community
INSTAGRAM:
Your weekly community newspaper covering Frankston, Frankston South, Karingal, Langwarrin and Seaford For all advertising and editorial needs, call 03
FREE
Tuesday 5 April 2022
5974 9000 or email: team@baysidenews.com.au www.baysidenews.com.au
Wall to wall artworks A SERIES of new murals have been painted around Frankston. Artists came to town last month to take part in the Big Picture Fest. See story page 5. Picture: Supplied
Five per cent rate cut proposed Brodie Cowburn brodie@baysidenews.com.au A FRANKSTON councillor is pushing for a rate cut. Cr Steven Hughes has put forward a proposal to cut general rates for Frankston residents by five per cent in the 2022/2023 financial year. He told The Times that “total council spend is the main driver why Frankston rates are as high as they are. It’s quite simple, if council spends less than rates will go down.”
“Council must re-focus its energies on providing superior services to the community at an affordable level based on the means of our residents. That might mean forgoing a new swimming pool or fancy statues but it will bring legitimacy back to an organisation that is currently viewed, by many in the community, as out of touch with their reality,” he said. A response to the proposal put together by council’s director corporate and commercial services read that the impact of the five per cent rate cut would be “extremely significant and will impact on council’s future ability to both
provide services and deliver key community infrastructure projects.” Cr Hughes said “there is a lot of financial fear mongering about how a rate cut would impact on services but it’s all hullabaloo. I have ring-fenced key departments like community and health, and community safety to protect their funding from being impacted.” He proposes that the reduction in rate income be offset by cuts to council’s operating costs and capital works program. In response to the motion, council’s director corporate and commercial
services says “Frankston City Council rates are not higher than average in comparison to other metropolitan councils and are in fact generally lower particularly when comparing rates to other councils in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs”. The average rate collected per property assessment is roughly equivalent to nearby councils, but Frankston ratepayers pays more as a percentage of property value. Council says this is because “the average valuation in Frankston is generally lower than many of these councils and significantly lower in
comparison to inner Melbourne bayside suburbs. This means that for Frankston City Council to raise a similar amount in rates as other councils (for it to provide a similar level of local government services) it must use a rate in the dollar which is applied to the valuations.” The motion was scheduled to be put forward at council’s 4 April meeting, shortly after publication deadline. A proposal put forward by Cr Hughes in February last year to cut rates by one per cent was rejected with a 7-2 vote (“Rate cut promise not supported” The Times 24/2/21).