DECISIONAL TRAPS IN FOURTH AMENDMENT PRIVACY CASES TANWEER KALEEMULLAH, JD, LLM, MHA/MBA† I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 479 A. Pre-Katz .................................................................................. 480 B. Katz & Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Era ..................... 482 II. JUDICIAL DECISIONS ANALYSIS ..................................................... 483 A. United States v. White–Pro-Security ...................................... 484 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 484 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 484 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 486 B. United States v. Miller–Pro-Security ...................................... 487 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 487 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 487 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 489 C. California v. Ciraolo–Pro-Security ......................................... 489 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 490 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 490 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 492 D. Rakas v. Illinois–Pro-Security ................................................ 492 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 492 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 492 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 494 E. United States v. Place–Pro-Security ....................................... 495 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 495 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 495 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 496 F. Kyllo v. United States–Pro-Privacy ....................................... 496 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 496 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 497 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 498 G. Florida v. Jardines–Pro-Privacy ............................................. 499 1. Factual Background .......................................................... 499 2. Judicial Effect on Privacy ................................................ 499 3. Summary of DT Issues....................................................... 500 †
NEED AUTHOR’S NOTE
477