“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
“The Institute for Development of Freedom of Information” (IDFI) Project - “Public Information Database”
Informational Bulletin #4 The research has been carried out within the framework of the project “Public Information Database- www.opendata.ge”. Financial backing has been provided by The “Open Society-Georgia Foundation”
The ideas expressed in the Bulletin do not represent the position of The Open Society Georgia Foundation. Correspondingly, the organization is not responsible for the information contained in the Bulletin.
No part of this Bulletin may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without a written permission from the IDFI.
Redactor: Levan Avalishvili, Project Director Authors: Sergi Jorbenadze, Project Coordinator Tea Tseradze, Project Analyst
Contact Information: 4, A.Machavariani (Aragvi) St. Tbilisi, Georgia, 0179 Phone: +995 32 2 996364 E-mail: info@idfi.ge
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Introduction
The second phase of the project “Public Information Database - www.opendata.ge” has started in Septeber, 2011. IDFI has submitted official requests for public information to public authorituies of Georgia and has requested information on different issues and adinistrative expenses incurred for the period of the second quarter (April-June) 2011. Questions of the second and first phases were the same, but simultaneously IDFI with the standard requests has submitted questions about the creation of official web-pages, the list of employees and public registries.1 It should be noted that, during the second phase of the project, information about salaries and supplements, bonuses, business/ official/ international visit expenses, expenses for the service of vehicles (repair, wear), fuel consumption and telecommunication expenses were requested for the complete system and the staff who implements public authority separately. Within the project “Public Information Database - www.opendata.ge”, the public information has been actively requested. Answers were analyzed in terms of content and also was carried out a detailed analyze of financial data. The total amount of sent requests is 5024. Public authorities where the requests were sent are 229 and the published document on the web-site www.opendata.ge has reached 3300 units. It is noteworthy that when public authorities had no information about different questions such kind of answers and therefore requests were abolished. For example when public authority had no implemented programs or projects and the answer was the same, the request and the answer was not recorded in statistics.
1
Sent requests you can see on the link below: http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/creating_new_requests
2
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Access to public information in Georgia – General Trends for the period of SeptemberDecember 2011 The assessment of the realesed public information for the second phase of 2011 was carried out on the basis of the following principles: a) Complete information; b) Incomplete information; c) Ignored information; d) Rejected information Received answers were distributed as follows:
Requests sent to public authorities4366 Refused - 126 3% Incomplete - 703 16% Ignored - 1569 36% Complete - 1968 45%
3
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
The Number of Answers Received from the Public Institutions - 2797 2000 1000 0 Delivered in comply with time frames - 65%
Delivered in violation of time frames - 35%
Taking about revealed trends of second phase of the project, it is necessary to explain what each principle of assessment means specifically: a) Complete Information – represents such kind of answer, when public authority’s response is comprehensive. We would like to emphasize public authorities, who have released public information completely:
Received Complete Answers Number of requests Eurasian Transport Corridor Investment Center Center of Electoral Systems Development, Reforms and Trainings Municipal Board of Dmanisi National Bank of Georgia
Satisfied requests
Rejected
Ignored
Complete
Incomplete
14
14
0
0
14
0
14
14
0
0
14
0
18
18
0
0
18
0
16
16
0
0
14
2
4
2011-2012 September January
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
National Agency for standards, Technical Regulations and Metrology Land Transport Agency Levan Samkharauli National Bureau of Forensic Medicine Public Defender of Georgia State Hydrographic Service Legal Aid Service
16
15
0
1
14
1
18
18
0
0
16
2
18
18
0
0
16
2
17
17
0
0
16
1
19
19
0
0
17
2
18
18
0
0
17
1
b) Incomplete Information – represents the case, when public authority’s response is not comprehensive. Incomplete answers were received from the following public authorities:
Received Incomplete Answers Number of requests Tbilisi City Hall
Satisfied requests
Rejected
Ignored
Complete
Incomplete
24
17
0
7
7
10
21
14
0
7
4
10
24
20
6
4
6
8
21
18
7
3
3
8
18
14
0
4
7
7
Supreme Court of Georgia
Agency of Protected Areas
Ministry of Justice of Georgia Agency of Free Trade and Competition
5
2011-2012 September January
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
Ministry of Agriculture of Georgia
21
14
1
7
6
7
19
13
0
6
6
7
20
18
6
2
5
7
20
11
0
9
4
7
21
10
0
11
3
7
Financial Monitoring Agency Ministry of Corrections and Legal Assistance The Office of the State Minister on European and Euro-Atlantic Integration Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development
C) Ignored Information – represents such kind of case, when public institution doesn’t implement its obligations and have no any reaction on the requests submitted by the IDFI.
Public Authorities, which have ignored the requests submitted by IDFI Number of requests
Satisfied requests
Rejected
Ignored
Complete
Incomplete
Special Governmental Connections and Information Agency
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
Healthcare Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Service Agency of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs of Georgia
6
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
Notary Chamber of Georgia Treasury Service (State Treasury)
2011-2012 September January
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
Penitentiary Department
National Probation Agency Georgian National Investment Agency Georgian Chamber of Commerce and Industry Maritime Transport Agency
Social Service Agency Mikheil Shengelia Museum of Georgian Medicine National Curriculum and Assessment Center Educational and Scientific Infrastructure Development Agency National Center for Teacher Professional Development Sh. Meskhia Zugdidi State Teaching University Office of Resource of Educational Institution Information Center on NATO
7
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
Batumi City Hall
2011-2012 September January
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
18
0
0
Gudauri Development Fund Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission
Municipal Boards, which have ignored the requests submitted by IDFI
Number of requests Municipal Board of Vani Municipal Board of Samtredia Municipal Board of Khoni Municipal Board of Tianeti Municipal Board of Tsageri Municipal Board of Mestia Municipal Board of Chkhorocku Municipal Board of Aspindza Municipal Board of Borjomi Municipal Board of Ninotsminda Municipal Board of Gardabani
Satisfied requests
Rejected
Ignored
Complete
Incomplete
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
8
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
Municipal Board of Tetrickaro Municipal Board of Kaspi Municipal Board of Kareli Administration of the State Representative-Governor in the Kvemo Kartli Region
2011-2012 September January
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
22
0
0
d) Rejected Information – is the case when public authority refuses to provide information and the refusal is without the bases of the legal ground. For example Children and Youth Development Fund has provided the answer about public registry, but there is only explanation about the meaning of registry.2
General Problems The main problems revealed during the second phase of the project is conneted to the violation of public authority’s obligations under the legislation of Georgia. Denoted circumstance should be explained by two different reasons: a) Public Authority violates its obligations consciously; b) Public Authority doesn’t know how to observe Georgian legislation. For example, revealed the fact that, when request is about the expenses incurred by the public official, who implements public authority the answers received from the Ministries and other public institutions are the same, such kind of template.3 The issue would not be problematic, the answers were complete, but the explanation indicated in response is the following: “public authority does not
calculate requested data seperately.“ 2
http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_files/axalgazrdobisfondi_reestri.pdf for example the enswer received from the Ministry of sport and youth affairs on the salaries/supplements, bonuses, telecomunication expenses and others. http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2050 and the response from the Ministry of Justice of Georgia http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2248 the answers are both identical. 3
9
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
In our opinion, ebove mentioned answers is avoidance the release of public information, because it’s impossible financial department of public authority doesn’t know the amount of salaries and bonuses of the ministries, or doesn’t know the amount of fuel consumption by the deputy ministries. Also it’s unbelievably that LEPL’s financial departments4 or administrations of the state representativegovernor are be able to calculate the data and for example financial department of ministry of finance of Georgia is not able to repeat the same accounting operations. It should be noted that public authorities release the expenases incured by the complete system, they can make a differentation between the complete system and central office, but are unwilling to release public information about officials, therefore they do not want to become known actually what the money is being spent on the provision of high-ranking officials. Regrettable fact is also that, some of the public institutions has change their position with regard to accountability and transparency and if the response of the first phase of the project was comprehensive, the second one is already incomplete, because for unknown reasons they was unable to calculate financial information of high-ranking officials separately.5
4
For example Levan Samkharauli National Forensics Bureau http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2157 See the response 2010 of the Ministry of Environment Protection http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_files/tanamdebobrivi_sargoebi0001.pdf and the response 2011 of the same Ministry of Georgia http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_files/garemosdacva_xelfasipremia.pdf 5
10
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Salaries and suplements of complete system Incomplete - 13 7%
Ignored - 10 6%
Complete - 160 87%
Salaries and Suplements of Officials
Ignored - 53 32%
Complete - 83 50%
Refused - 16 10% Incomplete 14 8%
11
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Bonuses for Complete System Incomplete - 13 8%
Ignored - 21 13%
Complete - 129 79%
Bonuses of Officials
Ignored - 56 39%
Complete - 62 43%
Refused - 13 Incomplete 9% 13 9%
12
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Telecomunication expenses of Officials
Ignored - 56 34%
Complete - 79 49%
Refused - 16 10% Incomplete 12 7%
Fuel Consumption of Officials
Ignored - 54 35%
Refused - 16 11%
Complete - 62 40% Incomplete 22 14%
13
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Expenses of vehicals (repear/wear) of Officials
Ignored - 56 40%
Complete - 57 41%
Refused - 16 12% Incomplete - 10 7%
The same trend is observed also in the case of the General Courts of Georgia, when they don’t release the information for the reason that such an action would lead to paralyze the work of court staff. In our opinion this is the flagrant violation of law.6 Also in the case of General Courts of Georgia, answers received from the city/district courts are identical and avoiding to release of information.7 The case belongs to the category of systematic proble, when public authorities release information about their public registries. In the most cases, the answer doesn’t contain information about the data of public registry or is indicated only requisites of public information request/releaseing.8 According to the General Administrative Code, Article 35 public registry is the formal and/or official document in which public institution is obliged to put public information in. In public registry must be indicated public information of its adoption, from the creation, processing or publication within 2 days, with the names, making, creating, processing, publication date, the natural or legal person, public official, public agency, the name of the reference from which it came and / or who sent it. Therefore, public registry must be include all public information existing in public authority and not onle the requisites of request/releasing of information. In public registry must be include financial accounting documents, administrative and legal acts issued by the officials and others. Public registry may be filled out manually (in most cases, when
6
http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/548 See the answer from the Tbilisi City Hall, and other identical responses http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/560/; 8 For example, public registry in which is indicated only requisites of request/releaseing of public information http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2166. 7
14
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
public authority doesn’t have electronic public registry, received copies of registries are filled out manually).9
Public Registry Complete - 6 3%
Ignored - 87 49%
Incomplete - 62 35% Refused - 23 13%
We consider that in any cases, public authorities have no knowledge about public registry and what kind of information shoul be filled in it. Or they may know but they don’t conduct. Therefore, public authorities violate duties assigned and the question on public registry is left unanswered. It should be noted that the number of identical answers on public registry were 22.
9
Public registry received from the municipal board of Gori: http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/4006 also municipal board of Dusheti: http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/3819.
15
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs
http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_files/sporti_sajaro.reestri.pdf
Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources
http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2226
Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia
http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/424
Ministry of Environment Protection
http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/421
Civil Registry Agency
http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2684
Speaking on the revealed problems, it should be underlined superficial approach to the consideration of the statements, in particular the situation when issued regarding to the release of public information are considered superficially. For example, IDFI has requested web-page creation expenses of public authorities and the responses were about the expenses incurred for the second quarter 2011 only.10
Web-Page Creation Expenses
Ignored - 55 38%
Complete - 51 36%
Incomplete - 36 25% Refused - 1 1%
Should be noted answers received in response to the different requests submitted during the second phase of the projet. These requests were about specific issues related to the competence of the public authority and the largest percntage of the rejections are in such cases. For example:
10
Response from the Ministry of Environment Protection http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/421; Complete answer were provided by the Ministry of Agriculture http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/text_info/id/2480.
16
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Different Requests - 182 Incomplete - 25 14%
Refused - 34 19% Ignored - 17 9%
Complete - 104 58%
Bonuses for the Chairman of the Supreme Court http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/515 of Georgia Official visit expenses in USA of the Chairman http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_files/parlamenti_mivlineb of the Parliament of Georgia is_xarjebis_shesaxeb.pdf copies of the advertising agreements about the http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_files/jandacva__magistili. expenses incurred on TV broadcasting of the pdf commercials. - Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Protection Total number of administrative cases and http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/560/ statistics of decision
Access to Public Information in Regions of Georgia In contrast to the first phase of the project, during the second phase were implemented requesting of public information from the Reions of Georgia, in particular: Self-governing cities, municipal boards, administrations of the governonrs, also from the governmnts of autonomous republic of Adjara and Abkhazia. If we compare with the information received from regions and the information received from other executive bodies we notice that approach of the regional public authorities is more serious than others
17
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
and issued information is comprehensive and complete.11 For example, answers from the administrations of governor are twice more than the responses received from the ministries and governement of Georgia. Also, it should be underlined that the number of rejected answers is no recorded.
Sent requests to the administrations of governors- 199 Incomplete - 20 10% Ignored - 47 24%
Complete - 132 66%
Sent requests to the ministries and government of Goergia - 461
Incomplete - 109 24%
Refused - 59 13% Ignored - 141 30%
Complete - 152 33%
11
See the answer from the Municipal board of Dusheti http://www.opendata.ge/en#!lang/en/cat/news/topic/485
18
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
For display the difference between the actions of local and central government, there is the list of issues that central executive authorities do not make public. In particular, salaries of officials:
Total quarterly amounts of salaries, supplements and bonuses given for the staff who implements public authority at Public Institution Public Institution Ministry of Justice of Georgia
Ministry of Finance of Georgia
Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia
Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection of Georgia Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs
Answer refuse http://www.opendata.ge /pdf_files/iusticia_xelfas ebi.pdf refuse http://www.opendata.ge /pdf_files/finansta_xelfa sipremia.pdf refuse http://www.opendata.ge /pdf_files/ganatleba__xe lfasi.pdf refuse http://www.opendata.ge /pdf_files/_kultura_xelf asipremia.pdf refuse http://www.opendata.ge /pdf_files/sporti_xelfase bi.premiebi.pdf
Public Institution Administration of the State Representative- Governor in Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti Region Administration of the State Representative- Governor in Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Region Administration of the State Representative- Governor in Kakheti Region
Answer complete http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_file s/samegrelo_zemosvaneti_xelfas ebi.pdf complete http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_file s/racha_lechxumi_xelfasi.pdf
Administration of the State Representative- Governor in Guria Region
complete http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_file s/kaxetisgubernatori_xelfasebi.p df complete http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_file s/guri_a_xelfasebi.pdf
Administration of the State Representative- Governor in Samtskhe-Javakheti Region
complete http://www.opendata.ge/pdf_file s/samcxejavaxeti_xelfasebi.pdf
Distribution of the responses received from the local governments and municipalities gives us the basis for make ebove mentioned conclusion.
19
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Sent requests to the public authorities - 1389 Incomplete - 109 Ignored - 320 14% 23%
Complete - 875 63%
The number of answers received from the public institution - 1069 1000 500 0 Delivered in comply with time frames - 53%
Delivered in violation of time frames - 47%
Of course, the unanswered requests are frequent or the answers are incomplete. But we can make a conclusion that, on the basis of revealed trends, access to information in the regions is at a higher level than the situation in central government is.
20
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Conclusion
In the framework of the project conducted by the IDFI, has revelaed the main problems regarging to the access to information and freedom of information. In the most cases, public authorities don’t make information public, that on the one hand indicates to the violation of law and the other hand indicates disdain to the work. This is absolutely contrary to the principles of a democratic state.12 In addition, access to information in the administrative bodies in the regions of Georgia is at a higher level and commitment is being implemented than the situation in central government is. Unfortunately, there is a category of persons in public institutions, who do not realize how important is the transparency of public sector and the openness of the budget expenditure. If we perform a parallel with the first phase of 2011,13 it is clear that the facts of the ignored and refused requests for public information are still actual problem in Georgia.
12 13
Verdict of the Supreme Court of Geogia, 2010, February 9, Nbs-1250-1194(k-09). See http://www.opendata.ge/userfiles/files/GEO%20opendata%202011.pdf
21
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
The comparative analysis of the first and second phase of the project First Phase
Second Phase 1968
2000 1569
1659
1500 1000 500
703
641 346 94
126
0 Refused
Ignored
Complete
Incomplete
Annex 1
Within the project “Public Information Database - www.opendata.ge”, the public information were analyzed in terms of content and also was carried out a detailed analyze of financial data. Data processed in the framework of the project gave us possibility to make an overview on the budget expenditure of the public authorities. On the basis of the received public information has revealed public institutions, which have spent a large amount of money for the period of second quarter 2011, but it should be underlined that, data are presented based on the received public information only,
these information are received in response to the IDFI’s requests.
22
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Unfortunately, the table cannot be complete and doesn’t reflect the actual disbursements of budget funds by all public institutions, because in most cases received answers were incomplete. Data presented in table is the perfect example how users can use, search and analyze the public information, placed on the “Public Information Database www.opendata.ge”.
Information about expenses incurred for the period of first (January, February, March) quarter of 2011 Category List of Employees
Public Institution 1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
2.
The Security Police
3.
Boarder Police of Georgia
4.
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
Sum Total (GEL)
24 950 11 763 4 000
2 569
List of Contractors
5.
Georgian Technical University
1.
Tbilisi State Medical University
2.
Ilia State University
3.
National Statistics Office of Georgia “Geostat”
4.
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
2 564 2 614 1 894 1 186
953
Salaries of complete system
5.
Georgian Public Broadcaster
1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
2.
Boarder Police of Georgia
3.
Ministry of Finance of Georgia
907 88 411 810 10 043 635
9 985 848,70 4.
Special State Protection Service of Georgia 6 512 517
5.
Georgia Revenue Service 6 245 571,87
Salaries of Officials
1.
National Agency of Public Registry
689 454,15
23
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2.
2011-2012 September January
Administration of President 134 220
3.
Constitutional Court of Georgia
4.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Protection
126 550
95 550 5.
Levan Samkharauli National Forensics Bureau 67 186,89
Bonuses of complete System
1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
2.
Ministry of Finance of Georgia
3.
Georgia Revenue Service
4.
Special State Protection Service of Georgia
10 298 078 5 019 289 3 621 809
1 023 811
Bonuses of Officials
5.
Prosecutor’s Office of Georgia
1.
Georgia Revenue Service
2.
Administration of President
3.
Levan Samkharauli National Forensics Bureau
977 720 97 600 93 907
76 750 4.
5.
Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia
71 480
Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Protection 66 650
Reserve Funds
1.
2.
Office of the State Minister of Georgia on Diaspora Issues
703 000
Office of the State Minister of Georgia on European and Euro – Atlantic Integration 600 000
3.
The Office of the Business Ombudsman of Georgia 476 975
4.
Georgian Public Broadcaster
5.
Administration of President
150 000 134 220
24
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
Official visit expenses
1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
2.
Parliament of Georgia
3.
Special State Protection Service of Georgia
2011-2012 September January
1 051 026 438 079
323 984 4.
Government/ Chancellery of Government 220 600
5.
Office of the State Minister of Georgia on European and Euro – Atlantic Integration 164 500
Web-page creation expenses
Fuel Consumption of complete system
Fuel Consumption of Officials
1.
Georgia Revenue Service
2.
National Environmental Agency
3.
Rustavi City Hall
4.
Ilia State University
5.
Georgian National Film Center
1.
Border Police of Georgia
2.
Georgia Revenue Service
3.
Prosecutor’s Office of Georgia
4.
Tbilisi City Hall
5.
Administration of President
1.
Ministry of Health Labour and Social Protection
45 000 14 900 11 270 9 853 9 128,30 734 472,08 599 427,45 324 381,17 318 640 145 910
92 740,85 2.
Administration of President
3.
Georgia Revenue Service
63 218
42 192 4.
Expenses of Vehicles (repair/wear) of complete system
Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia
5.
Constitutional Court of Georgia
1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
39 001 22081,85 456 613
25
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2.
Georgia Revenue Service
3.
Border Police of Georgia
4.
Special State Protection Service of Georgia
2011-2012 September January
177 561,28 156 485,83
111 562
Expenses of Vehicles (repair/wear) of Officials
5.
Tbilisi City Hall
1.
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs of Adjara
79 094
36 266,80 2.
Constitutional Court of Georgia 26 305,40
3.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Protection 25 603
4.
Telecommunication Expenses of Officials
Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia
5.
Georgia Revenue Service
1.
Parliament of Georgia
2.
Administration of President
3.
The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia
4.
Service Agency of the Ministry of Finance
5.
Levan Samkharauli National Forensics Bureau
10 864,20 6 862 30 080 19 333 10 923,50 8 705,67
6 490 Telecommunication Expenses of complete system
1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
2.
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
571 266
123 405 3.
Border Police of Georgia
4.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia
5.
Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development
112 750 100 273
80 393,17 Procurements
1.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
51 484 247,70
26
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
2.
Georgia Revenue Service
3.
Border Police of Georgia
4.
Rustavi City Hall
5.
Levan Samkharauli National Forensics Bureau
2011-2012 September January
11 923 872 5 777 102,48 3904978,03
1 752 374,69 Implemented Projects
1.
2.
National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia
863 344
Georgian Technical University
681 800
Implemented Cultural Event
3.
“SAMTREST” – State Department of Vine and Wine
4.
National Statistics Office of Georgia “Geostat”
5.
Ministry of Agriculture of the Autonomous Republic of Adjara
1.
413 341,30 342 463,30
198 580
Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development 3 638 938,42
2.
Georgian National Tourism Agency
3.
State Fund for Protection and Assistance of Victims of Human Trafficking
729 050
234 161 4.
Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs
5.
National Bureau of Enforcement
192 054 144 662,02
In the framework of the project was carried out the detailed analyze of financial data, received from the regional public authorities. In contrast to the other public institutions, from the municipal board and administrations of the governonrs were requested information about expenses incurred for the period of first and second quarters of 2011.
27
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
2011-2012 September January
Information about expenses incurred for the period of first (January, February, March) and second (April, May, June) quarters of 2011 Category Salaries/Supplements of complete system
Salaries/Supplements of officials
Bonuses of complete system
Bonuses of officials
Reserve Funds
Official visit expenses
Web-page creation expenses
Public Authority
Sum Total (GEL)
1.
Municipal Board of Telavi
2.
Municipal Board of Mtskheta
3.
Municipal Board of Chiatura
1.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Kakheti Region
2.
Municipal Board of Guria
3.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Mtskheta Mtianeti Region
1.
Municipal Board of Mtskheta
2.
Municipal Board of Marneuli
3.
Municipal Board of Keda
1.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Kakheti Region
34 785,24
2.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samtskhe Javakheti Region
34 100
3.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo Svaneti Region
28 875
1.
Municipal Board of Akhaltsikhe
2.
Municipal Board of Marneuli
3.
Municipal Board of Khashuri
1.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo Svaneti Region
2.
Municipal Board of Marneuli
3.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Kakheti Region
1.
Municipal Board of Martvili
2.
Municipal Board of Tsalenjikha
583 821 557 318,33 477 549 59 560 58 860 47 040 164 926,62 163 240 124 088
5 728 984 2 994 278,80 2 875 313 28 451 15 931,74 8 580,38 5 150 4 700
28
“Public Information Database� www.opendata.ge
Fuel Consumptions of complete system
Fuel Consumption of Officials
Expenses of Vehicles (repair/wear) of complete system
Expenses of Vehicles (repair/wear) of Officials
Telecommunication expenses of Officials
Telecommunication expenses of complete system
Procurements
Implemented Projects
3.
Municipal Board of Zugdidi
1.
Municipal Board of Zugdidi
2.
Municipal Board of Khelvachauri
3.
Municipal Board of Lagodekhi
1.
Municipal Board of Akhalkalaki
2.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo-Svaneti
2011-2012 September January
4 500 75 762 70 958,40 55 911,50 33 495,60 31 392
3.
Municipal Board of Kharagauli
1.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo-Svaneti
2.
Municipal Board of Mtskheta
3.
Municipal Board of Senaki
1.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Kakheti Region
2.
Municipal Board of Kharagauli
3.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo Svaneti
9 155
1.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo Svaneti
10 540
2.
Municipal Board of Akhalkalaki
3.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Kakheti Region
1.
Municipal Board of Marneuli
2.
Municipal Board of Lanchkhuti
3.
Municipal Board of Zugdidi
1.
Municipal Board of Shuakhevi
2.
Municipal Board of Zugdidi
3.
Municipal Board of Akhalkalaki
1.
Municipal Board of Zugdidi
2.
Municipal Board of Ambrolauri
29 353 17 857 12 870 11 971 12 450 10 122
4 091,58 3 900 31 993,21 30 089 25 911 2 883 318 2 021 379,44 2 020 531 2 124 153,20 304 169
29
“Public Information Database” www.opendata.ge
Implemented Cultura Events
List of Employees
List of Contractors
3.
Municipal Board of Martvili
1.
Municipal Board of Akhmeta
2.
Municipal Board of Zugdidi
3.
Administration of the State RepresentativeGovernor in Samegrelo Zemo Svaneti Region
1.
Municipal Board of Mtskheta
2.
Municipal Board of Ozurgeti
3.
Municipal Board of Gori
1.
Municipal Board of Gurjaani
2.
Municipal Board of Chiatura
3.
Municipal Board of Lanchkhuti
2011-2012 September January
264 307 2 704 485 1 455 514 187 333 231 229 208 94 35 31
30