Ministry of the Attorney General
Ministere du Procureur general
Legal Services Branch Ministry of Government Services
Direction des services juridiques Ministere des Services gouvernementaux
Ferguson Block 77 Wellesley Street West, 6th Floor Toronto ON M7A 1N3
Edifice Ferguson 77, rue Wellesley Ouest, 6" etage Toronto ON M7A 1N3
Telephone: Fax:
416 325-9393 416 325-6383
Telephone: Telecopieur:
速 Ontario
416 325-9393 416 325-6383
By Regular Mail November 16, 2009 Donald Mark Westover
-----r-\~.R~.#4~ .------ -Kemble, ON
NOH 1SO
Dear Donald Mark Westover:
Re: Your correspondence I am a lawyer with the Ministry of Government Services. I have been asked by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor for the Province of Ontario to review certain correspondence and documents that you sent to the Honourable David Onley September 10, 2009. The correspondence that has been sent by you and regarding you to the Lieutenant Governor is incomprehensible and appears to have no basis in Canadian law. I am unaware of what personal financial or other legal obligations you may have, but the correspondence that has been sent by and about you, and the actions described in that correspondence, do not relieve you of any such obligations that you may have. Neither the Lieutenant Governor nor any agent of the Government of Ontario will be taking any further action in response to the correspondence that has been sent to the Lieutenant Governor regarding this or related matters. .
Copy to:
The Office of the Lieutenant Governor for the Province of Ontario the Honourable David C. Onley
:Donald- Mark: Westover: c/o RRl Kemble, Ontario
The Honourable David Charles Onley Office of the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario Room 131, Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, ON M7A lAl
January 15, 2010
Dear Mr. Onley, I am in receipt of the response you commissioned the Ministry of the Attorney General to send to me on November 16, 2009 with respect to my documents mailed on September 10, 2009. I have included a copy of it with this letter. I find it incomprehensible that the lawyers employed by the Ministry of the Attorney General would find my documents "incomprehensible". To further state that said documents have no basis in Canadian law makes me question if the lawyers are acquainted with Canadian law. I will remind you that as a government agent/official you are bound by the Criminal Code of Canada and the Canadian Constitution and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This, again, is covered in my Claim of Right and Notice of Understanding and Intent. The government is in the service industry and is not the ruling class. The people are the sovereigns. You are duty bound by oath to the Queen and Defender of the Faith to protect me and my interests. As such, you and your Minister's office will tend to the appropriate paperwork to give me safe and unmolested passage and will defend my rights and freedoms, inalienable or claimed. I have stated that I am under no contract and so no obligation to obey rules, statutes or laws made by defacto government. Please check the Criminal Code for verification. I have used a number of commonalities which Canada and I may share to illustrate my intentions and reasons and to show that even with your rules with which you govern yourself, I have lawful standing. If your lawyers are unaware of what "termination of contract" and "offer of contract" and "acceptance of contract" look like it is not me that is to blame. I have made every effort to be clear and concise, and at considerable cost and time. I have had my documents witnessed and read and critiqued by a number of people. They did not find my documents "incomprehensible". They did not find and agree that my documents "had no basis in Canadian law". It is time for those in the service industry to perform the tasks that they were commissioned to act upon. Canada and I have a new arrangement and not the one of old in which the disobedient servant misrepresents and abuses its constituents. If Canada has a representative government, what constitutes representation? You do not represent me. You have been served with a termination of the old contract and are in receipt of the new contract. I will represent and so govern myself. I offer violence to no man and am governed by conscience and God Almighty. You have accepted my offer as chiefly outlined in my fee schedule. I am currently satisfied with this arrangement. You hold the office of "public servant", while I, from time to time, hold the position of "the public". I am pleased to accept your services on illY terms alone. I will direct these services; they will not be assumed from my control.
Perhaps this example will illustrate to VK Silver the nature of my documents and illuminate with understanding the "incomprehensible": Coca Cola is a corporation with rules and regulations. All people who are employed by Coca Cola are bound to its rules and codes by contract. Yet the rules are only binding to those in contract with Coca Cola. Anyone outside of contract is free to govern themselves as they see fit. Even other corporations are free to do as they decide. Pepsi, for example, is not bound by Coke's codes. Coke has no right to impose its rules on any other party who does not wish to enter into contract with it. Coca Cola is like the Corporation of Canada, Ontario, all incorporated towns and cities and organizations. I am not a member of the bar, nor do I belong to any organization that would exert force or power over its constituents or members. I am a Man and not a beast to be controlled and farmed by those who would fashion themselves as self-appointed global caretakers. Ones such as these suppose they know best how to handle my affairs: they do not. They are FIRED of any position of governance over me. The function of law in a free society is to protect each other's rights, freedoms, liberties and properties from those who would not love their brothers as themselves. Government agencies, corporations, officials and other bloodless entities have left their proper station of protecting the people for abuse, power and plunder. This is far from what our forefathers people have the power; not the government.
had intended for us. Under the self-governing system the Government derives its power from the people to serve
the people and not to their detriment. This differs from the old system in that Man was not designed to serve an earthly king by nature; corporations and law were by nature, however, designed to serve Man. If we are not free men, we are slaves. If we are slaves and you or your organization are our masters, say as much and show how this came to be so that I may serve in peace. If you do not respond with information confirming this power then you are agreeing that we are free men. If we are free men, then your ministry must derive its power from the people. This power is borrowed by agreement and so free men yield some of their liberties so that your government may operate. In this fashion, free men subordinate themselves by contract to legal fictions. Thus, all law is contract law. Even in the Old Testament when the Almighty became a God to Israel, it was under contract. Israel agreed to God's terms. The Constitution Acts (Schedule B, Part 1) of your government declares that it recognizes the Supremacy of God and the rule of law and that Canada was founded on this. As God created Man first and Law secondly it follows that the order of authority 1. God 2. Man 3. 4.
Family Rule of Law
5. 6.
Community Corporations
The corporation
is as such:
of Canada and all its subsidiaries are pulling up the rear. You will need to show me how
if God created all men equal that another man (or more stunning still, a fiction like a corporation) gained jurisdiction and power over me. As I refuse to contract with any party which would remove my liberty from my power I must assume that your office has received some form of written permission from the Almighty Himself. I should like to see that. Please. Until then, any Act of Parliament which violates my freedoms and liberties is of no effect and void. The Constitution Acts Section 32 (1)(a-b) limits the Acts to Parliament and government of Canada. Govern yourself accordingly. The rights of the individual are protected from majority rule. The rights of the collective can never be greater than the rights of the individual, however else we may be commonly taught. I am sure the banks will stand behind me on that. Even you would cringe at the idea of having your assets, wealth or life voted from your possession.
This self-governing hierarchy makes me the monarch and your ministry the servant. Rogue, obstructive corporations who have left their estate must return to their designed function or have their power revoked. I am doing such a thing and will not reinstate power until a time in which I have regained faith in its intentions
and purpose.
It is easy for you to respond with remarks like {{this ministry does not recognize your documents" or other such things. I don't know if this means anything to me. You have an obligation to me under our new arrangement of September 10, 2009; this much is sure. Fear not. I will not abuse your office and our new relationship. I will send you documents from time to time for deregistration
or other such concerns as I do not wish
to confuse your system or your agents. I will expect you to care for these tasks at your end as I have at mine. I look forward to a peaceful, rewarding
relationship
for us both in which I live according to conscience
and God Almighty and the love of my fellow man, while you protect my rights and freedoms as per your office's design and your oath to the Queen. Our correspondence will be posted in the public at www.issuu.com[golden.don for your convenience. I will be taking no further action in response to your correspondence as I have had my terms accepted by all involved. Please review my documents for your complete awareness and understanding.