Architectural Portfolio 2020 by Vladislav Malenko

PORTFOLIO

20 20

SELECTED WORKS VLADISLAV MALENKO

Vladislav Malenko Education

Wellesley West, Toronto, ON, M4Y 1E8 +1 437 345 0151 vlad.malenko@gmail.com Languages English С1, IELTS 7.5 Russian - native German B1 (working proficiency) French А2 (learning)

Profile

An experienced architect, skilled in a range of sectors from architectural design to interior design, and complex multidisciplinary research projects. Worked on projects from concept to delivery and with a variety of building typologies on different scales: institutional (incl. health care and educational), cultural, residential, mixed-use, and industrial. Capable of developing any idea and shaping it into a building volume in line with regulations and standards.

Work experience Senior Architect. Moscow, Russian Federation. 2015-2019 Contract jobs at multiple companies; Trio Project Company, LLC; Central Institute for Modern Design, LLC; Geometr, LLC. Intermediate Architect. 2013-2015 Moscow, Russian Federation KB-Strelka, LLC; Evrogroup, LLC. Hamburg, Germany Ministry of Development and Environment (BSU) Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation New Aviation, LLC. Intermediate Architect / Researcher / Tutor. 2013-2014 Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation. ITMO National Research University. Manager of research studio at trans disciplinary Master Program of Advanced Urbanism. Part-time. Juniour Architect. Southern Federal Okrug, Russian Federation 2008-2013 Pragma-Sochi, LLC; Konstruktor, LLC.

Achievements

2009 Diploma of Specialtist in Architecture. Institute of Architecture and Arts of Southern Federal University. Department of residential and civil buildings. 6 years, full-time. GPA 4.75 (out of 5)

•

As recognised by WES: Bachelor's Degree

•

Software

Proficiency in: Revit Architecture, Autocad 3ds max+vray SketchUp Adobe Suite: Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator MS Office Rhinoceros Basic knowledge: Dynamo Grasshopper Archicad

•

Activities

Nominee of the program of Senate of Hamburg for young professionals, 2014 I prize for the article “Trans disciplinary approach to complex projects of urban transfromations" at the conference at ITMO, Saint Petersburg, 2014. With co-authors Workshops and master classes as a part of a research at Design of Urban Ecosystems, ITMO, Saint Petersburg. 2013-2014 Research Rostov-on-Don. Atlas and Vision for Sustainable Growth, 2012-2013. Presented through lectures and workshops. Courses of German language, Inlingua Sprachschule Berlin, 2011-2012

Contents: Architectural projects Architectural and urban studies | research

Educational facility for 220 students

Section 2-2

Yakutsk. Design 2016-18. Set into operation 2020 Total area 7850 m2 Number of stories: 2-3 Building volume 31â&#x20AC;&#x2122;148 m3 Senior project architect. Responsibilities: Project coordination with a project manager, meeting deadlines, architectural design, supervision of 4 architects, coordination with an interior architect. BIM Revit. Concept, documentation for building permit, construction documents. - educational facility is in the subarctic climatic region on permafrost. The architectural concept is based on the consecutive network of internal courts and atriums with ceiling lighting. The facility includes classrooms, a conference hall, an assembly room, a planetarium, and a gymnasium with a pool.

Ground floor plan

Revit model views and sections

- Carried out under the agreement on a public-private partnership. Strict control over the construction budget.

Section 1-1

Fountain section

Revit model sections

Educational facility for 220 students

National school for 550 pupils

Completion, state as d.d. the end of 2019

Yakutsk. 2016-2018. Set into operation Total area 10324 m2 Number of stories: 3 + basement Building volume 51 190 m3 Ground floor plan

Senior Architect. BIM Revit, 3ds max+Vray Stages: concept, amendments in “Project” stage (building permit documents), development of construction documentation, amendments in interior design in compliance with the technological arrangements. Based on the approved “PPT master plan’ documents. Early school and kindergartens volumes. Insolation studies.

2nd floor plan

Facade proposals Configurations of the class rooms according to the state standards and design peculiarities - Despite being built on permafrost, the building is not elevated and has a cold basement with technical rooms. This solution could become possible by building on sand filling on the reclaimed territory of the floodplains. - The facility features an addition - the interpretation of the Urasa, the summer house of Yakuts, which houses a national theatre and a national dance hall. - Carried out under the agreement on a public-private partnership. The strict control of keeping construction costs within the amount approved by the contract.

Functional diagrams of early design studies

3rd floor plan

School for 350 pupils

Ground floor plan

Art school with library

Ground floor plan

Yakutsk. 2016-2018. Set into operation Total area 6500 m2 Number of stories: 3 Building volume 33’000 m3 Senior project architect. Responsibilities: Project coordination with a project manager, meeting deadlines, architectural design, group supervision. BIM Revit. Concept, building permit. Commissioned to make amendments in the concept in compliance with the requirements of fire safety regulations, daylight factor, insolation, and technology. Educational facility in harsh climatic conditions in a permafrost region.

2017 Total area 9533 m2 Number of stories: 2/3 + basement Amendments in construction documentation (Stage ‘R’), and ODI (accessibility mesures for disabled people)

Kindergarten for 200 pupils

Functional diagram

2017 Total area 3435 m2 Number of stories: 3 2nd floor plan

Amendments in construction documentation (Stage ‘R’). BIM Revit

Center of contemporary culture and art 2016-2018 design and construction. Occupancy permit - 2020

Site plan

Total area 5526 m2 Number of stories variable 3-4 Building volume 39 544 m3 Work under the supervision of a senior architect. BIM Revit, 3ds max+Vray Development of documentation for building permit (Stage ‘P’).

3rd floor plan

Revit model view and section

2nd floor plan

3rd floor plan

2018 Number of storeys 4+basement Total area 3837 m2 Building volume 15690 m3

Healthcare Facility Moscow. 2017-2018 Set in operation

Preparation of documentation for the reissuance of building permit - amendments, for reentering the Moscow State Expertise.

Total area 71’205 m2 Number of stories 7+ 2 underground floors Building volume 297’879 m3

Senior Architect on the project. BIM Revit. Concept. Development of the technological layout in cooperation with a chief technologist. Presentational materials for building permit. BIM Revit Model preparation for the issuance of documents for building permit. Preparation of the model and development of the design assignment for the final visualisation.

Department of anatomic pathology facility with funeral hall

Ground floor

2018 Total area 2’212 m2 Number of storeys: 2 + 1 underground Building volume 12’200 m3

Visualisations

issuance of documents for building permit. The facility is located at the border of the hospital territory on a narrow stripe of vacant land with steep topography. In order to comply with the hygienic regulations, the building is made more descreet by being placed below the average elevation of the premises in the excavated area. Service roads, reguired by the technological scheme and fire regulations, are provided from both sides.

Senior Architect on the project. Technological scheme with a chief technologist. Presentational materials for city officials for getting a buildng permit. Development of the design assignment for final visualisation. BIM Revit. Model preparation for the 2 floor

77600 3200

5700

9000

3300

5700

7200

4800

4500

Эвакуационный выход

2 (005)

1800

5700

8400

Эвакуационный выход

11400

Эвакуационный выход Е

1.14

Верхнее освещение

1.07

1.08 1.01

1.05

1 (006)

1.28

1 (006)

1.13

1.12

1.22

1.16

1.23

1.24

1.29

Верхнее освещение

1.06

1.02

1.25

1.11

1.30

1.26

Поступление инфекционных трупов

Поступление трупов

Въезд

Выдача тел из траурного зала

Зона погрузки-разгрузки

Выезд

Верхнее освещение

2 (005)

3200

5700

3300

5700

3300

5700

7200

4800

4500

2100

4800

1800

5700

8400

11400

77600

h a n g e Pro

k lic C

bu y

F-

k e r- s o ft

r wa

4 floor

Функциональное зонирование Административные помещения Вертикальные коммуникации Горизонтальные коммуникации

Ритуальная группа

Служебно-бытовые помещения

Б 4800

3 floor

1.19

1.10

1.09

1.27

1.21

10200

1.04

1.03

1.20

1.15

5100

1.18

Верхнее освещение

2700 2400

15000

4800

2700

2100

Вход для работников

2400

5100

-1 floor

Forensic facility

Секционная группа Технические помещения

Polyclinic for 320 visitors Total area 2253 m2 Number of storeys variable 4-5 Building volume 37’263 m3 Senior Architect. Development of the technological layout with a chief technologist, master plan, facade proposals. Preparation of presentational materials for the city officials. Development of the design assignment for final visualisation. Work in BIM Revit.

Ground floor plan

-1 floor plan

The approved facade solutions were recommended as an exemplary for using for other facilities commissioned by the client. Preparation of the BIM model for the issuance of documentation for building permit.

Section 1-1

2 floor plan

Approved proposal

Perintal centre Moscow. Design 2017-2018 Set in operation. Total area 51’700 m2 Number of stories: variable 3/5/7+ground floor+ technical floor Building volume 236’000 m3 BIM Revit. Modelling of the facades in accordance with as-built 3D scan model of the monolithic framework of the Building A. - Preparation of materials for contractors for facade glazing. - Preparation of the sets of documentation specifically for the client. Namely, schemes of facades with marks of every amendment during the construction and fire regulation requirements, BOMs and BOQs. - Preparation of assignments for interior design and assessment of the developed design on compliance with norms and the technological part of the project - Design solutions for the hospital checkpoint. Building permit. Work in a team as a second architect.

Fragment of a cortyard facade

3 floor plan

4 floor plan

As-built scan geometry superimposed on the Revit model

- Work in a team on amendments of architectural documentation for the Moscow State Expertise.

Fragment of an external facade

O y bu lic k

N O

Basement

k e r- s o ft w a

y to ck

Cli

-1.01

-1.02

2.42 Уборная персонала

7.33 Душевая

-2.310

-1.03

-1.10

-1.11

2.74 Уборная персонала

4.83 Душевая

-1.16

-1.23

165.39 Инженерно- технические помещения

-3.200

48.30 Инженерно- технические помещения

-1.28

33.24 Компрессорная

-1.06

h a n g e Pro

! O W N y bu

21.49 Электрощитовая

-2.300

2790

9.35 Лестничная клетка 5

-1.27

4.86 Тамбур

-1.09

-1.30

-3.200

5.32 Помещение уборочного инвентаря

F-

29.72 Коридор

-2.720

lic k

y bu

2500

lic k C

15.99 Вакуумная

-3.200

-1.25

-2.300

re k e r - s o f t w aБ

-1.22

115.27 Глухое помещение

-1.18

-1.29

6.05 Коридор

-1.17

8.76 Инженерно- технические помещения

-1.21

45.33 Глухое помещение

6.03

! O W

3480

-1.19

23.42 Глухое помещение

-1.14

11.50 Коридор

-2.300

-1.24

-1.20

9.02 Глухое помещение

-1.13

6.10 Коридор

-1.08

84.45 Венткамера

102.08 Коридор

-2.300

25.87 Гардеробная верхней одежды

ББ

-1.26

-1.15

28.79 Гардеробная рабочей одежды

-1.12

2390

19450

hange ProВ d

16.08 Коридор

-3.200

F-

-1.07

3.42 Тамбур

6020

22.60 Гардеробная рабочей одежды

-1.04

2.09 Тамбур-шлюз

-3.200

2270

k e r- s o ft w a

-1.05

17.19 Техническое помещение СС

k e r- s o ft w a

-3.200

7300

1100

4690

9620

20580

2740

9720

1000

5900

5500

3600

71750

O N

1/2

bu y

1/1

lic k C

k e r- s o ft w a

-1.060 5%

1.07 2270 6020

1.13

1.28

1.25

1.24

1.23

1.21

1.17

1.16

1.29

1.51

1.52

+0.000

1.26

1.50

1.30

1.36

1.43

1.39

2790

1.10

+0.600

-0.030 -1.050

F-

1.41 1.46

1.45

-0.015

1.44

-0.960

1.47

+0.000

1.40

1.37

+0.000

1.35

1.34

1.33

1.32

1.31

1.11

+0.480

+0.000

2500

C om

k e r- s o ft w a

1.01

nge P ro Cha

lic

2390

19450

3480

W O N y bu to k lic

N y bu to k lic C

1.38 +0.000

! O N y

om .c

1.42

1.02 +0.000

ББ

k e r- s o ft w a

1.12

1.48

+0.000

h a n g e Pro

1.22

1.20

+0.000

1.19

1.09

-0.495 -0.480

F-

1.15

1.03

-0.480

F-

nge P ro Cha

1.14

1.49

ББ

-0.640

1.18

+0.000

-0.655

1.27

Зона ожидания пациентов

1.04

lic

-0.930

-0.480

1.06

-1.920

-0.030

1.08

+0.000

lic k

bu y

h a n g e Pro

F-

Ground floor

k e r- s o ft w a

-0.030

-3.200

-0.640

-0.655

-0.640 -1.050

-0.655 7300

1100

4690

9620

20580

2740

9720

1000

5900

5500

3600

71750

1/1

1/2

2 floor 2

2.07 2270

2.25

2.06

Зона ожидания пациентов

2.05 6020

2.16

2.17

2.12

2.13

k eБr - s o f t w a

h a n g e Pro O N y bu

2.44

2.42

2.41

2.43 8%

+3.360

2.39

2.38

2.36

2.35

2.34

2500

lic

2.33

2.32

y bu

k lic C

2.30 2.31

2790

2.11

bu to

bu to lic

F-

2.37 2.10

2.09 +3.680

2.40

+3.680

2.01

2.08

2.02

lic

ББ

1/2

2.45

O3480 W !

! O

hВange Pro

F-

2.49

2.20

+3.360

2.48

2.47 2.46

2.28

2390

19450

2.27

h a n g e Pro

k e r- s o ft w a

2.26

2.21

+3.360

F-

h a n g e Pro

2.24 +3.360

2.18

2.03

2.23

2.15

2.14

+3.680

F-

2.22

2.19

2.04

ББ

k e r- s o ft w a

+4.060

7300

1100

4690

9620

20580

2740

9720

1000

5900

5500

3600

71750

1/1

1/2

3 floor Г 2

3.07 31

37 3.15

3.20

3.21

3.27

3.33

3.34

3.36

3.46

3.48

F-

h a n g e Pro

3.50

3.29.1

+7.040

3.10

3.01

3.12

3.37

3.38

3.39

3.40

3.41

3.42

3.43

3.25

k e r- s o ft w a

+6.720

3.44 3.49

Б 8%

+7.070

a k e r-s ББo f t w

3.22

3.11

+6.720

+7.040

lic k

lic k C

+6.720

3.02

N O

3.32

PD om

3.31

3.28

k lic C

3.24

3.23

3.18

3.17

3.13

1/2

3.09

k e r- s o ft w a

+6.720

W O to

N y bu lic

3.51

3.47

+6.720

3.29

3.35

3.30 3.26

3.19

3.16

3.03

nge C h a Г Pro

F-

k e r- s o ft w a

nge P ro

Cha

X F-

3.14

3.08 3.04

nge P ro

3.05

Б Cha

+5.120

3.06

ББ

X F-

+7.470

+5.120

1/1

1/2

4 floor

Fragments of facades

4.07

2270

10.99 Лифтовый холл

4.22

+10.080

4.29 7.33 С/У

4.31

11.59 Паразиты

8.61 Центрифужная

! W N O

2790

7300

1100

4690

9620

20580

2740

9720

1000

5900

5500

3600

71750

h a n g e Pro O

lic

O N y

to lic

.c re

k e r- s o ft w a

1/2

5 floor

ББ

Е 5.03

2270

17.55 Лестничная клетка 3

Возможные зноны размещения приточных камер (обсуждалось с Вячеславом 21-09-2019

6020

5.02

245.32 Помещение

+13.360

5.05

5.04

+13.440

22.71 Лестничная клетка 4

91.76 Помещение

5.01

+13.440

24.00 Лестничная клетка 2

Г 2390

1/2

19450

3480

5.06

+14.700

96.57 Инженерно- тех ническое помещение

Возможные зноны размещения приточных камер (обсуждалось с Вячеславом 21-09-2019

2500

ББ

Б 2790

k e r- s o ft w a

F-

1/1

А Г 7300

1100

4690

9620

20580

2740

9720

1000

5900

5500

3600

71750

1/1

1/2

4.52

21.34 Зав. лабораторией

4.25

10.85 Кабинет дежу рного врача

Г nge Pr Cha

h a n g e Pro

bu 4.59

96.56 Венткамера

10.44 Прием и регистрация биоматериала

4.38

4.36

9.09 Автоклавная

11.64 Палата на 1 койку

4.53

9.15 Резервное помещение

4.39

15.58 Биох имия

4.27

7.01 Комната персонала

4.37

8.41 Моечная

4.34

15.75 Биох имия

F-

4.33

18.81 Палата на 1 койку

6.48 Санпропускник для перс онала

om .c 2500

4.01

14.36 Лифтовый холл пожаробезопасная зона

4.35

2.51 Помещение

5.17 ПУИ

4.28

22.40 Буфетная

9.43 Коридор

4.30

6.25 С/У

4.24

4.23

+10.080

W ББ

k e r- s o ft w a

4.26

4.20

8.27 Пост медсестры

2.47 Тамбур

lic

3480

4.21

25.66 Зона дневного пребывания

22.70 ЛК 4

13.62 Коридор

4.40

4.32

25.45 Резервное помещение

4.60

Not Enc losed Коридор

+10.080

4.62

4.18 Резервное помещение

48.38 Коридор

4.02

N O y bu

10.58 Лифтовый холл-пожаробезопасная зона

4.56

4.55

3.20 Ду шевая

4.41

54.87 Коридор

4.61

4.58

18.97 Комната персонала

4.51

15.37 Коридор

4.19

2390

19450

lic

4.50

5.05 Санузел

4.49

6.73 Сан. комната

+10.080

1.35 Слив

13.70 Гардеробная рабочей одежды

4.45

14.34 Общеклиника

149

1/2

4.44

15.57 Гематология

4.57

h a n g e Pro

om .c

C -X

4.43

15.57 Цитология

4.18

5.88 Санузел

k e r- s o ft w a

4.54

16.07 Гардеробная рабочей одежды

4.47

4.42

14.28 Серология

4.15

5.60 Санузел

+10.080

12.08 Палата на 1 койку

4.16

18.93 Палата на 1 койку

4.13

25.18 Палата на 2 койки

27.42 ЛК 2

6020

O N y bu to lic C

lic

k e r- s o ft w a

14.73 Палата на 1 койку

4.11

5.68 Санузел

4.03

5.22 Санузел

4.12

8.35 Санитарная комната

4.09

17.17 Коридор

2.85 Ду шевая

4.17

4.14

4.10

4.08

19.89 Коридор

4.04

3.41 С/У персонала

W !

h a n g e Pro

W !

F-

4.05

22.15 ЛК 3

4.48

3.33 С/У персонала

h a n g e Pro

4.46

4.01 ПУИ

Б XC

+10.080

4.06

ББ

F-

lic k

y bu

6.05 Служебная лестница

h a n g e Pro W!

to ck

om .c

-3.200

F-

k e r- s o ft w a

C lic k

O W ! to

bu y

O W ! N bu y to lic k

F-

k e r- s o ft w a

Cli

h a n g e Pro

F-

k e r- s o ft w a

New construction. Floor plans

h a n g e Pro

1.05

k e r- s o ft w a

F-

этажа

-3.200 План -1 этажа

-3.2 00 План -1

+0.000

h a n g e Pro

+0.0 00 План 1 этажа

+3.360

+3.3 60 План 2 этажа

План 1 этажа

Demolishion phases

Fragment of facade cladding

F-

+6.7 20 План 3 этажа

План 2 этажа

k e r- s o ft w a

Fragment of south elevation

F-

(+ 2880)

ий этаж

План 4 этажа

+6.720

2019 Total area: 4920 m2 Number of storeys: 4+Basement+Upper technical floor Facade design for the reconstruction of typical policlinic facilities in Moscow. BIM Revit, 3ds max+Vray

+10.080

h a n g e Pro

Техническ

План 3 этажа

Тех. этаж 2 +13.440

этаж

План 4 этажа

k e r- s o ft w a

F-

Polyclinic facilities

to +14.500

Технический

BIM model of the existing structure based on the materials of structural inspection. tr

k e r- s o ft w a

h a n g e Pro

Кровля ЛК +16.740 +16.320 Парапет +15.870 Тех. этаж Кровля пристроев

+17.890

+17.890 Кровля ЛК +16.740 +16.320 Парапет +15.870 Тех. этаж Кровля (+2880) пристроев +14.500 2 Тех. этаж +13.440

Reconstruction, with addition of an annex, of the hospital’s western wing. Development of layouts with the technologist according to the medical assignment. It included: diagnostic department, surgery department, ambulatory, and administration offices. F-

WIP Revit model

Senior Architect. Coordination with a project manager. Development of a reconstruction concept with a technologist and issuance of documentation for buildng permit (Stage ‘P’). BIM Revit. Phases of demolishion, new construction. Documentation for building permit.

lic k

k e r- s o ft w a

2019-ongoing

h a n g e Pro

W !

Reconstruction of medical facility

F-

W !

h a n g e Pro

Perintal centre

F-

Meteostation of Space Port Vostochnyi 2014 Number of storeys: 1-2.

Materials testing facility Number of storeys: Concept of the building. Development of layouts with a technologist, facades.Visualisations.

ArchiCAD, 3ds max+Vray 1st place in a closed competition

Work under the supervision of a chief architect. Development of the concept with a technologist, issuance of documentation for building permit. Visualizations. AutoCAD, 3ds max+Vray

Administration building 2013-2014 Total area 8800 m2 Number of storeys 8, 10 (for different proposals). Scope of work: Amendments in the design assignment. Development of the architectural concept of the administration building and assembly facility on the premisies of a helicopter plant. Coordination and preparation of the assignment for visualization (including modeling and master plan draft). Presentation materials for the client.

Assembly facility Total area ca. 8000 m2 Number of storeys 3 Work under the supervision of a chief architect. Development of the layouts with a technologist. Issuance of documentation for building permit Ground floor

2 floor

3 floor

Transport scheme of airport UFA Concept of the terminal facility. 2013-2014 Total area ca. 24'500 m2 Number of storeys: 2/3. Development of the concept of the transport and parking scheme of the airport terminal in coordination with a chief technologist in accordance with state regulations and airport safety regulations (Russian and ICAO).

Transit hub facility 2018 Total area 7961 m2 Number of storeys: 4 above ground Senior architect, in coordination with a project manager, chief structural engineer, and a chief technologist. Development of the concept based on approved “PPT Master plan” in BIM Revit. Technological scheme, facade proposals, visualizations in 3ds max+Vray. The main feature of the structure that it is located directly above the arched ceilling of the subway station. Specific structural framework, which was proposed in order to redistribute loads which significantly influenced the floorplans and technological scheme.

Visualisation of the concept of the airport terminal for 500 passengers per hour. Collaboration on the development of documentation for building permit under the supervision of a chief architect (for the airport terminal concept with capacity of 250 passengers per hour).

Bird-eye view of the airport terminal for 500 pass./hour

Transit hub facility

Ñëóæåáíûé âúåçä

2018 Total area 8500 m2 Number of storeys: 3+1 underground Presentational CG of the approved proposal of the terminal (with capasity 250 pass./hour (by xyzproject) for which documentation for building permit where developed.

Preliminary design. Analysis of city bylaws and site limitations. Building volume concept. Transit hub with commercial function. Studies of the building volume on a site with somplex topology and development of a technological scheme in line with technological assignment.

Ãëàâíûé âõîä

Òåõí è÷ çîíà åñêàÿ

Ïÿòíî çàñòðîéêè 4400 ì2

Âúåç ä ïàðê â èíã Îõðàííàÿ çîíà òåïëîñåòè

Âõîä

Óñëîâíûå îáîçíà÷åíèÿ Ïðîåçäû Òðîòóàðû Îçåëåíåíèå

Âúåçä è âûåçä äëÿ ïîñåòèòåëåé

Low-rise residential development with kindergarten and in-built commercial premises

Mid-rise residential development with kindergarten and underground parking facility 2016 4 residential buildings, 1 office+hotel suits, 1 kindergarten for 140 pupils, 1 undeground parking (cap. 1020 cars) Site 5 ha Total area of residential buildings 108’762 m2 Total area of units 76’825 m2 Work under the supervision of a principal architect. Leading a group of 6 architects.

2015-2016 Work under the supervision of a principal architect. Leading a group of 6 architects.

Solar envelope study

Site 7 ha Total area of units 51’000 m2 Amendments in “PPT master plan”, insolation analysis, floor plans, facades. Coordination with site plan engineer. Preparation of the BIM model for the issuance of documentation for building permit.

Amendments in the approved “PPT Master plan” in BIM Revit according to the client’s assignement. Generative design of the solar envelope - to define maximum buildable volume, Rhino+Grasshopper. Floor plans, facade proposals, underground parking concept. Master plan

13.83 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

9.82 Ǹȡȣțȭ 15.44 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

14.06 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

3.71 ȃȜșș

2.74 ǰȎțțȎȭ

5.04 ȃȜșș

1.55 ǿ ȁ 6.10 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.32 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

1.53 ǿ ȁ

1.55 ǿ ȁ

22.11 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

5.58 ȃȜșș

15.55 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

2.95 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

2.70 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

2.66 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

? ?

6.57 ȃȜșș

3.54 ǰȎțțȎȭ

16.69 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

? ?

5.12 ǸșȎȒȜȐȎȭ ȚȎȟȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ

31.41 ǽȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ ȝȓȞȟȜțȎșȎ

14.55 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

2.26 ǿȎțȡȕȓș

11.67 Ǹȡȣțȭ

10.94 Ǹȡȣțȭ

5.22 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

48.55 ǺȎȟȠȓȞȟȘȎȭ ȚȎȟșȭțȜȗ ȔȖȐȜȝȖȟȖ

5.12 ǸșȎȒȜȐȎȭ ȚȎȟȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ

23.50 ȃȜșș 23.35 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ

4.28 ȃȜșș

3.54 ǰȎțțȎȭ

14.87 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

16.37 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

10.44 Ǹȡȣțȭ

1.67 ǿ ȁ 3.15 ǰȎțțȎȭ

10.80 Ǹȡȣțȭ

4.51 ǯȎșȘȜț

7.16 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

47.55 ǺȎȟȠȓȞȟȘȎȭ ȎȘȐȎȞȓșȪțȜȗ ȔȖȐȜȝȖȟȖ Ȗ ȞȖȟȡțȘȎ

12.79 Ǹȡȣțȭ

16.95 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

9.73 ȃȜșș

3.88 ǰȎțțȎȭ

15.68 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

16.14 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

41.95 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ 13.68 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

6.77 ȃȜșș

3.44 ǰȎțțȎȭ

8.93 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ 2.93 1.23 ǰȎțțȎȭ ǿ ȁ

3.60 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ 29.61 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ

10.07 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

5.01 ȃȜșș

2.48 ǯȎșȘȜț

14.70 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

9.19 ȃȜșș

2.75 ǰȎțțȎȭ

15.27 ȃȜșș

3.69 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț 15.91 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

? ?

14.76 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

15.38 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ 1.36 ǿ ȁ

3.57 ǰȎțțȎȭ

2.72 ǰȎțțȎȭ 2.95 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

? ?

15.13 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

11.01 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.47 ǰȎțțȎȭ

8.94 Ǹȡȣțȭ 1.13 ǿ ȁ

? ?

9.00 Ǹȡȣțȭ 22.82 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

4.67 ȃȜșș 1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

? ?

3.34 ǯȎșȘȜț

3.62 ǯȎșȘȜț

4.63 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

16.52 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

3.14 ǽȡȖ

7.89 ǿȎțȡȕȓș Ǻ

? ?

4.51 ǯȎșȘȜț

? ?

19.60 ǸȎȏȖțȓȠ ȠȓȜȞȓȠȖȥȓȟȘȖȣ ȕȎțȭȠȖȗ ȘșȡȏȎ

31.08 ǸȜȞȖȒȜȞ 7.89 ǿȎțȡȕȓș Ǵ

3.69 ǰȎțțȎȭ 2.03 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

16.72 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

5.41 ȃȜșș

19.06 ǸȎȏȖțȓȠ ȠȓȜȞȓȠȖȥȓȟȘȖȣ ȕȎțȭȠȖȗ ȘșȡȏȎ

18.00 ǸȎȏȖțȓȠ ȠȓȜȞȓȠȖȥȓȟȘȖȣ ȕȎțȭȠȖȗ ȘșȡȏȎ

16.44 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

4.25 ȃȜșș

18.74 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

24.10 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ

21.79 ǸȎȏȖțȓȠ ȠȓȜȞȓȠȖȥȓȟȘȖȣ ȕȎțȭȠȖȗ ȘșȡȏȎ

10.41 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

3.44 ǰȎțțȎȭ

? ? 4.27 Ǹȡȣțȭ

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

3.40 ǰȎțțȎȭ

10.09 Ǹȡȣțȭ

15.34 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

13.35 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

11.73 Ǹȡȣțȭ

2.24 ǿ ȁ

2.67 ǰȎțțȎȭ

2.24 ǿ ȁ

11.73 Ǹȡȣțȭ

6.55 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ 1.89 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

16.63 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ 3.40 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.03 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

9.95 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.09 ǰȎțțȎȭ

5.07 Ǹȡȣțȭ 3.06 ǰȎțțȎȭ

12.77 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ

10.17 Ǹȡȣțȭ

15.34 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

4.46 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

1.36 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

10.09 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.44 ǰȎțțȎȭ

18.74 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

4.19 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ 1.43 ǿ ȁ

16.63 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ 5.25 ȃȜșș

14.20 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

8.95 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

12.39 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

3.40 ǰȎțțȎȭ

9.41 ȃȜșș

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

15.18 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

3.08 ǰȎțțȎȭ 5.25 ȃȜșș 9.41 ȃȜșș

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

27.80 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ 6.34 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

2.63 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

14.20 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

10.41 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

3.09 ǰȎțțȎȭ

3.66 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.25 ȃȜșș

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

Insolation duration by facades

5.41 ȃȜșș

4.75 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

16.44 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

2.13 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ 2.03 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

2.95 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

3.69 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.57 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

13.68 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

15.91 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

5.01 ȃȜșș

41.95 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț 2.95 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

1.24 ǯȎșȘȜț

8.94 Ǹȡȣțȭ

1.13 ǿ ȁ

4.67 ȃȜșș

16.52 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

2.92 ǯȎșȘȜț

22.11 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

8.64 Ǹȡȣțȭ

12.55 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

13.99 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

1.26 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

0.86 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

1.56 ǿ ȁ

4.32 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

6.10 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.32 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.57 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

1.17 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.57 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.49 ǿ ȁ

8.64 Ǹȡȣțȭ

13.99 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

12.55 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

0.86 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

1.56 ǿ ȁ 4.32 ǰȎțțȎȭ

11.08 ȃȜșș

14.73 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

5.78 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

11.40 Ǹȡȣțȭ

4.52 ǰȎțțȎȭ

12.18 Ǹȡȣțȭ

1.54 ǯȎșȘȜț

3.28 ǰȎțțȎȭ

14.66 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

12.85 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.50 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.57 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

1.17 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.57 ǰȎțțȎȭ

4.27 ȃȜșș

8.35 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.28 ǰȎțțȎȭ 1.49 ǿ ȁ

8.81 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ

11.52 ȃȜșș

3.80 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.15 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.19 ȃȜșș

3.62 ǯȎșȘȜț

8.35 Ǹȡȣțȭ

9.75 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ

8.81 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ

11.52 ȃȜșș

22.82 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ 13.83 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

14.73 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

9.75 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ

8.93 Ǹȡȣțȭ țȖȦȎ

3.71 ȃȜșș

14.21 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

2.04 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ 4.94 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

2.92 ǯȎșȘȜț

3.20 ǰȎțțȎȭ

8.82 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.74 ǰȎțțȎȭ

2.93 1.23 ǰȎțțȎȭ ǿ ȁ

3.47 ǰȎțțȎȭ

4.63 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

7.16 ǹȜȒȔȖȭ

5.58 ȃȜșș

3.69 ǰȎțțȎȭ

2.74 ǰȎțțȎȭ

20.96 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

4.50 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

16.03 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ 16.72 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

11.08 ȃȜșș

14.09 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

3.80 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.15 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

13.51 Ǹȡȣțȭ

4.52 ǰȎțțȎȭ

1.80 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

20.44 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

2.35 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

4.27 ȃȜșș

4.19 ȃȜșș

13.63 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

4.98 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

6.63 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

3.91 ǰȎțțȎȭ

14.54 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

13.55 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

? ?

0.95 ǯȎșȘȜț

10.12 Ǹȡȣțȭ

9.96 Ǹȡȣțȭ

14.54 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

13.79 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

2.66 ǯȎșȘȜț

? ?

14.54 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

13.55 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

? ?

0.95 ǯȎșȘȜț

10.12 Ǹȡȣțȭ

9.96 Ǹȡȣțȭ

14.54 ǿȝȎșȪțȭ

13.79 ǴȖșȜȓ ȝȜȚȓȧȓțȖȓ

2.66 ǯȎșȘȜț

6.23 Ǹȡȣțȭ

4.72 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

1.54 ǯȎșȘȜț

6.41 Ǹȡȣțȭ ? ?

15.08 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

7.20 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

3.06 ǰȎțțȎȭ

29.03 ǺȓȔȘȐȎȞȠȖȞțȩȗ ȘȜȞȖȒȜȞ

3.15 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

15.28 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

12.77 ǹȓȟȠțȖȥțȎȭ ȘșȓȠȘȎ

4.20 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ 14.97 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

3.09 ǰȎțțȎȭ

9.97 Ǹȡȣțȭ

? ?

3.24 Ǹȡȣțȭ

3.81 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

2.19 ǿ ȁ ? ? 3.24 Ǹȡȣțȭ

2.30 ǱȎȞȒȓȞȜȏ

1.54 ǯȎșȘȜț 14.10 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

7.49 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ

16.49 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

14.34 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

4.88 ǽȞȖȣȜȔȎȭ 5.39 Ǹȡȣțȭ 3.40 ǰȎțțȎȭ 14.46 ǴȖșȎȭ ȘȜȚțȎȠȎ

2.72 ǰȎțțȎȭ

4.08 ǯȎșȘȜț

3.74 ǯȎșȘȜț

Buildable volume

High-rise residential development concept

Схема -1 этажа Граница участка 4000

1400

1200 3100

2100

700

600

2100

3200

3900

5600 3200

3200

2100

14000 1600

1400

3300 1200

3800

4000 900

3000

5300

600

4000

3200

3900.000

14000 1600

3300

3900

2900

2017 Site 10.6 ha Total selling area 264’000 m2 Number of storeys 10-25

5600

4000

3200

5300

4500

3000

3800

4000.000

4500

900

3200 3300

5000

3300

3900.000

3000

2900

3200.000 3200

2900

4500

2800

4500

4000

4000.000

3200

3000

3200.000

2900

4000.000

7700

2800

3000

4000.000

3100 1800

3300

3000

4000.000

3100

4700.000

3200

4000

3000 3300

3300

2800

4000.000

3000

1800

2200 4000.000

3000

2000

800 5400

600

5800

1400.000

2800

3700.000

2800

600

4000

5800 4100

3700

3200

4000.000

3600

1400

3600

3700.000

1400

4000

4200

2700

4200

3200

3700

4000.000

1400.000

5400

4100

2200

4000.000

3700

3000

400

3000

4700.000

3200

3000

3200

3700

800

4000

2700 2800

2800

3600

4000

3000

3300

Development of the concept of a residential superblock. Due to the appliction special zoining bylaws on the site, density parameters were set higher as by standard zoning bylaws. This required precise insolation analysis and allocation of undergroung parking garages including altitude restrictions of an air corridor of the city’s airport.

3 000

3900 3200

1000

3200

2000

3 700

2000

2800

4900

3900

3 000

3200.000

22 0 0

3300

2800

3 000

22 0 0

3200.000

3000

3200

3700.000

3600

3200

3200.000

490 0

4000

3200.000

3700.000

2700

3200

22 0 0 1 40 00

3000

3200

2700

3 000

2800

4000

2800

3 000

4000

4400

4500

3 000

4400

3 000

7 700

3700

4400

3700

3 000

4400

4000

3 000

1300

4600

3700.000

4400

3900.000

2000

3000

3900.000

3000

4400.000

3700

1400

4400.000

4400

2300

3700.000

4400

4400.000

4400

3700

3700.000

3700

3000

2600

7100.000

4400.000

6900.000

3700

7100.000

3700.000

6900.000

1 40 0 0

4200.000

3400

4200.000

3400

3400 2900.000

3100 2900.000

3100.000 3200.000 2800.000 3000.000 3000.000 3600.000

3600

600.000

3200 2800 3000

2800.000 3000.000 3000.000

3000

3100.000 3200.000

2800 3200 2800 3000

2800

1800

600

600.000

3600.000

600.000

3000.000

3000

3000.000

3600

2800.000

600

3200.000

600

3100.000

3600

600.000

600

3000

3600.000

3600

3000

3000.000

3000

2800

3000.000

3000

3200

2800.000

2800

3200.000

3200 5800

1800

3100.000

2800 1400

2900.000

1800 5600

3100

3100 600

600 600

5600

1400

5800

600

5600

1400

5800

600

Граница участка

600

5600

1400

5800

600

Граница участка

Площадь застройки ( в ГНС ) кв.м. 32747.76 Площадь -1 этажа, кв.м. 32367.10 Количество М/М на этаже 860 м/м

Экспликация помещений Тип группы помещений Закрытая автостоянка Инженерные, технические, подсобные Коридоры, тамбуры, холлы, ЛК Рампы Общая площадь помещений на этаже

Площадь, кв.м. 28253.06 2101.03 1123.75 476.72 31954.56

Ratio of units by type

Reconstruction of a stadium tribune

Mid-rise residential development 2016-2017 Total area 174’000 m2 Number of storeys of block-size сomplex: 6-15 Number of storeys of tower: 23-25 Work under the supervision of a principal architect. Leading a group of 5 architects 1

Design based on “PPT master plan”. Insolation analysis, task assignments for the group, design of floor plans for the residential buildings of the first phase of development. BIM Revit

Корпус 1

Total area 1224.8 m2 Construction volume 4550 m2 Work under the supervision of a principal architect. Measurments and on-site inspection, development of documents for building permit, construction documents. Passing the expertise. Reconstruction of the northern tribune of a stadium, adding training facilities, a bike storage and a repaire workshop.

3 4 6

Корпус 2

Тип

Корпус 3

К. 4/2

К. 4/1 Корпус 4

Apartment hotel

Parking garage

3.78 Ванная

1.08 Гардероб

3500 18.72 Жилая комната

2.43 Гардероб

1к

So.=39.93 Sк.=38.37 Sж.=15.96

15.96 Жилая комната

So.=78.83

5000

3450

300

3400

7.99 Холл

8.75 Холл

1.80 Гардероб

So.=41.87

4.77 Холл

Д 13.22 Жилая комната

Sж.=16.95

16.95 Жилая комната

2.76 Лоджия

3100

3400

3.82 Ванная

1.31 3.51 Гардероб Ванная

2.75 Гардероб 1.51 С/У

1к Sк.=40.49

9.30 Кухня

3100

0.65

11.16 Кухня

1.20

3.91 Холл

11.30 Кухня

So.=55.33 Sж.=30.49

3.78 Ванная

16.61 Жилая комната

3.11 Гардероб

2к Sк.=53.29 15.84 Жилая комната

Sж.=31.14

31.41 Межквартирный коридор

2.58 Тамбур 1.73 Гардероб

2700

14.65 Жилая комната

So.=66.00

2к Sк.=62.85

16.50 Лифтовый холл

4.65 Холл 1.26 Гардероб

3.78 Ванная

3200

371.24

Sж.=47.50

2.52 Гардероб

6200

484.06

Продоваемая площадь:

3.18 Лоджия

14.00 Лестничная клетка

4.08 Лоджия

Площадь этажа:

3к Sк.=78.83

10.74 Кухня

25800

3100

5.90 Холл

3.24 Ванная 3.12 Лоджия

А 3300

5.39 Холл

3.12 Лоджия

3к Помещение общественного назначения

12.23 Кухня

0.92 Гардероб

3500

Б 15.96 Жилая комната

2к

3.24 Лоджия

2.12 С/У

3.33 Ванная

11.04 Кухня

3100

3300

1к

So.=40.79 Sк.=39.23 Sж.=15.96

Условные обозначения 1к

14.35 Жилая комната

3.14 Холл

4000

3200

300

Секция 5. 3.24 Гардероб 14.43 Жилая комната

3.14 Кухня-ниша

So.=42.79

2к Sк.=41.35

Sж.=27.11

2.88 Лоджия

3200

2.16 С/У

0.86

13.89 Жилая комната

3400

14.53 Жилая комната 3.12 Лоджия

3400

300

26300

Total area 7459.4 m2 Number of storeys 10+1 underground parking Construction volume 26324.6 m2 Work under the supervision of a principal architect. Collaboration on the development of documents for building permit, construction documents, facade proposals. Passing the expertise. Visualization in 3ds max+Vray

Number of storeys: Work under the supervision of a principal architect. Collaboration on the development of documents for building permit. Passing the expertise.

Recreational and educational facility Concept of low-rise residential district ‘PPT master plan’ Site area: 3.9 ha (I stage) and 8.5 ha (II stage) Leading a group of 3 architects. Development of stages, calculation of the capacity of a school and gindergartens (including allocation of land), calculation of the ratio of the types of apartments in every development stage, insolation analysis. Coordination and issuance of the assingment for visualization, modeling.

Work under the supervision of the company's principal. Concept of a recreational facility with an educational centre, boathouse and repair shop, and a parking deck above the railroad tracks in the Greater Sochi area. The project was included in the studio's exposition at 'Zodchestvo' exhibition in 2006, Moscow.

Architectural and urban studies | research

Solar envelope study and developement analysis

Urban study of Izmailovo disrtict, Moscow Preparation of design assignment for Topotek1

Work was performed during the internship at the Department of City Development and Environment (BSU, Hamburg, 2014) Shading and insolation study and building a solar envelope for the project of the former harbor development. Analysis was based on hygienic standards of two-hour insolation period for residential units and three-hour period for recreational areas in courtyards. Scripting in Grasshopper. Insolation simulations in LSS Chronolux

Urban analysis of a residential district Izmailovo in Moscow. Work in a multidisciplinary team. Preparation of the design assignment for the urban renovation concept. Coordination with a subcontractor, architectural firm Topotek1, Berlin.

2015

Examples of the proposed urban transformations of the target areas by Topotek1.

Analysis of the projects of street reconstruction in Moscow 2015 Audit of the realized projects of urban transformaion in Moscow as a part of the work on the city-wide program of the urban renovation 'My Street'. This research covered the analysis of major pedestrian artheries in the city centre as well as the Krymskaya

Rating of the Urban Environment of Residential Development in Saint Petersburg 2014-2016 Work on the project was performed during the employment at ITMO National University, Saint Petersburg in cooperation with the firm Urbanica Spatial Planning Institute.

Preparation of the assignment for a competition. Architectural analysis of a building volume Planning analysis and preparation of design objectives for the competition for an office building proposal with a memorial centre with an underground parking. On the pictures are shown layout options study for a memorial centre on the ground floor.

Development of the method of the evaluation of residential complexes and the application of a grade system. As result of work, an online interactive map was presented with data on each project including rating and commentaries.

Embankment and the Park in the name of Gorkiy. Development of a grade system and evaluation of the selected projects according to the developed method.

Rostov-on-Don. Atlas and Vision for Sustainable Growth 2012-2013 With a coauthor. Urban research of the city of Rostovon-Don was based on the principles of sustainable growth. This work included multifaceted analysis of the natural and urban environment, economic and social activities, their distribution in the city, and city and regional policies towards the exten-

sion of the territory and formation of an agglomeration. As a result of the study, the following were proposed: a transit-based model of densification based on the utilization of existing infrastructure and right-of-way of the existing network with the solutions to increasing connectivity of the urban tissue, revitalization of existing green areas and connection them in a proposed

Atlas Kronstadt Vision 2040

green belt with the creation of hiking and bike paths. Significant attention was brought to the city core - safety, socio-economic activity, and network of open areas and unbuilt spaces were analyzed. Were proposed: pedestrianization of certain central areas, revitalization of transit hubs and tranformation into public areas, and additions to the greenbelt framework.

2013-2014 Supervision of the atlas production group, and a research section 'Economy'. Urban research of Kronstadt, a satellite city in the Saint Petersburg agglomeration. Work within the framework of Master's program of Advanced Urbanism at ITMO National Institute, Saint Petersburg. Curator of the program Marcus Appenzeller MLA+. The results were presented to the city officials and published as a book. Points of growth

Space syntax analysis

Built environment Above: high density development zones based on proposed public transit networks and hubs. Left: Centres of socio-economic activities and radii of coverage. Right: some points of attraction of the city core: objects of heritage, theatres. Below: schemes of the analysis of topography and major problems. Areas in question

Recreational resources. Network of ravines and green areas.

Sprawling risk

Economic activity

Malenko Vladislav Portfolio - Competition - 2014

Mixed-use development master plan concept Site area 12 ha A project of redevelopment of the premises of an exhibition centre in Saint Petersburg. Work included a comprehensive analysis of the existing urban environment: architectural, social, economic; city general plan, and zoning bylaws.

The resulting product was a concept based on the principles of a traditional, or a Europian city: in scale, in spatial variety of building volumes and their relations to each other. As a premise of the project, urban planning national code was ignored by intent to create coherent and liva-

Master plan of city district. Analysis.

ble urban fabric, and not a traditional modernist residential district, endemic to Post-Soviet countries. Resolutions. 1. As a gesture of respect to the historiс and cultural heritage, the traditional approach to the city planning was implemented - baroque axes

and visual perspectives. 2. A respectful approach to the places of historic or natural value. Preservation and inclusion. 3. Better integration and connection. Walking scenario.

Height limits and zones

City scale objectives and prerequisites

Planning aspects and design methods

Building volumes for the proposed blocks

Masses

Block specs

Yellow areas are the zones of a special status or under preservation. Existing greenery was aimed to be preserved as much as possible and to be integrated into the system of streets and paths. As traditional for the city on the Neva river, visual axes and possible perspective corridors were analyzed. Besides the Skipper channel and the Galley Harbor, as natural visual corridors, a connection between the spire of an existing building on the site and the Church of Our Lady the Merciful was recovered and used in defining the framework of streets. This proposed corridor is a symbolic baroque technic which is characteristic of the urban structure of Saint Petersburg.

Left lower picture. According to the development plans of subway two station exits are to be built at the Skipper bridge and the corner of Skipper Canal street and Nalichnaya. Thу station is integrated into the shopping mall. The “spirit of the place” and a walking scenario of the fair center could be preserved and restored in the new city. district

Influence of existing urban centers and the addition of new functions that are in high demand in this part of an island to the development. The problem of the Vasiljevsky island is an interrupted connection of Bolshoy Prospect to the Strelka (the spit of Vasilyevsky Island). Space syntax analysis showed that the Strelka is relatively isolated from the rest of the island. It was considered very important to avoid the same planning mistake at the opposite end of the island and to design a permeable street network connected to the existing streets.

The analysis and facilitation of adverse climate conditions of the city were considered crucial for the design. The close vicinity of the site to the open water of the bay, high humidity and strong South-West winds unbearable in the cold period of the year pose a problem. In order to provide shelter and avoid the channeling effect and break the wind speed, a shift of the grid of residential streets was implemented and additional tree planting was considered at the wind entry points

Master-plan of the district

Analysis diagram

Functional zoning

Diploma project

Professor's house

Industrial hotel facility on the campus of Southern Federal University Number of storeys 4.5 Total area 134 m2 Conceptual design of a house growing on the building. Commute-free residence for a university professor attached to the wall of a faculty building The lack of available plots and strict zoning guidelines leave to option for a traditional one family house in a busy city centre. This concept utilizes the idea of using the so-called 'unused space' of the urban fabric: firewalls, setbacks, voids, etc. In this case, a brandmauer, a firewall, served as a base for the structure. The house provides separate access, parking space, private access to the building on the floor where the professor works. All the floors are connected by an elevator.

Design objectives. Single family house, any scenario at a choice Location. Rostov-on-Don, attached to the firewall of a university building.

Spatial diagram of the facility

The final thesis project is the research-and-production facility of South Federal University. The facility is located on the proposed site of the university campus. Design is based on guidelines of a proposed master plan by the architectural studio Oliva, submitted in 2008. The master-plan followed the formal unification of separate universities of the cities of Rostov-on-Don and Taganrog. The concept of South Federal University included not only the physical relocation of departments but also the development of research and production facilities which would boost the technological potency of a new campus.

Phases of growth of startup companies

The research-and-production facility is designed to facilitate the demands of all phases of the lifecycle of high tech companies: "seeds", "start-ups", and "matured businesses". The research-and-production facility is divided into 3 blocks: A, B, and C. Each block serves best for a specific customer. Block A with the adjacent two-storey workshop is for the companies which use heavy machine tools. Block B is 10 storeys tall and provides a variety of spaces that serves well both office and small production needs. Block ะก works as a common space including building management, a canteen, conference, and meeting rooms. The facility is designed to provide its tenants with special gases and liquids, freight elevator (in Block A), broadband connection, and back-up power supply. The diagram on the left shows three stages of development of research-and-production companies as by the studies of Tom Broadhurst. He divided them into three main stages: young, average, and adult. The duration of each period is 3-5 years during which the company

Contact details: Vladislav Malenko vlad.malenko@gmai.com +1 437 345 0151