i
n
t
h
e
i
n
t
h
e
aka: antifragility; how to live alive when/because nothing is private/secure/et al
imagining the many people who are currently: inspectors of inspectors and/or
obligers of inspectors and/or
angry/docile from all the inspecting/obliging and/or
dangerous/depressed from all the anger/docility and/or
. . .
imagining the potentially bad effects of dandelion/starfish ness..
dandelions spread fast. keeping us not only bound to the very thing we were choosing not to do, but mindless that we’re the ones perpetuating it. redefineschool.com/the-dandelion-effect/
cut off a starfish arm and it grows a new one. this is great news.. unless that starfish is seeking to do harm. redefineschool.com/starfish-ness/
and how to
perpetuating that.
perhaps the best privacy/security‌ is giving 100% of us something else to do.
perhaps then: 100% of us would be usefully preoccupied in the luxury of doing whatever we wanted or at least a considerably smaller percentage of us would be disturbed/disturbing/dangerous
and then.. perhaps a natural encryption ..
[
]
would ongoingly emerge via ensuing
imagining our idiosyncratic jargon
(the language going on in our minds.. our thumbprint-ness)
as cipher text..
ie: .. our encryption/protection/privacy would come from the too-much ness of documenting e v e r y t h i n g . begging you to connect with the actual person in order to decode. (we create our own layer of security. a good/flip side of what David paints in regard to the too much ness of bureaucracy) redefineschool.com/too-much/
not that you couldn’t decode it.. but you have no desire to (for bad) because you’re too busy b e i n g . authenticity the desire to decode it (for good) is embedded in a desire to c o n n e c t . attachment redefineschool.com/2-needs-a-cure/
imagine authorization comes simply from caring enough to decrypt. and you would have to care enough.. because decryption wouldn’t be from some time-efficient algorithm ness.. but from trusting/knowing a person ness.
ie: knowing beyond a single story as credential/connection.
how we know/decrypt. redefineschool.com/i-know-you/
with everyone (won’t work unless it’s everyone) allowed the luxury to do something else no one has the time/desire to decrypt/break-in for bad. we don’t need to spend time in meetings/trainings/interviews/wars.. locking/unlocking/securing-securities.. because we are together together enough. awake enough. to see/be/trust our one ness.
(perhaps that’s the singularity. the alive/antifragile singularity)
redefineschool.com/www/
the dance depends on us each being a vital/nonrivalrous (idiosyncratic) part of the dance.
perhaps making many of our man-made rules/technologies/ideologies irrelevant.
ie: security, privacy, property, encryption, permission, competition, ‌
how much time in our day do we currently spend.. ..trying to get people to listen-to/follow/like us
(our rules)
and/or trying to listen-to/follow/get in places (their rules). it’s like a relational bureaucracy of sorts. the thing getting in the way of us being us. and it leaves a trail of not-us ness. one that’s easily hacked/broken-into. our fraud divulged by other fraudladen people seeking some form of non-fraud/purpose. what if we all spent more time ..listeningto/following/embracing our own idiosyncracies/quirks/whimsies. and leaving a trail of that (self-talk as data). all without having to secure/defend/translate/prove every redefineschool.com/self-talk-as-data/ thought/dream/action.
imagining our ability to speak our own languages.. (idiosyncratic jargon) creating equitable access to communication. and then too – to serve as a degree of privacy we (may or may not) want. like a crypto scrambler. completely/publicly transparent – but invisible to the naked eye. (perhaps because we’re all naked)
imagining the code breaker is that you have to care enough about that particular person and/or topic.. to have 1\ already learned that particular jargon 2\ learn it really fast 3\ spend more time with the person or 4\ embrace the disconnect ..
but it would go both ways .. ..not a distraction (begging for attention) for those not inclined to connect ..as well as a translation aid for those really wanting to connect
perhaps.. idiosyncratic jargon/living (not intentionally.. but rather organically)
is one way that a person who is seeking/listening to their own heart/map daily‌ (in order to bring the best of them to the world et al)
creates their own chamber in the open. not as in silo. but as in a way to be private in public and public in private..
rather than babel izing some elitist bespeak, and then spending our time trying to fit/get-in, trying to protect/keep-out,
we create us/eudaimoniative surplus.
so.. perhaps
the state or condition of being free from being observed‌ ‌is about non-judgmental space for all of us in no place to hide Glenn writes ch 4: what made the internet so appealing was precisely that it afforded the ability to speak and act anonymously, which is so vital to individual e x p l o r a t i o n .
to know we’re basically anonymous.. ie: non-judged. [because we are all naked. i know you ness.]
because we’re in spaces of permission with nothing to prove. we’re afforded the luxury of time and space to just be. (to self-correct/shed/whatever)
we can be in a crowd/community without worrying about being watched/observed/judged.
we realize people don’t have time since they themselves are modeling/living eudaimonia. and yet they are still at our beckon call – like an unschooling mom.
so the safe ness of the space comes from all of us being: free artists. redefineschool.com/lets-do-this-first/
and.. perhaps
the state or condition of being free from being disturbed by other people‌ or in danger.. ‌is more about equity: all of us getting a go.. everyday. (so none of us are inclined to disturb/harm.. all of our needs are met)
redefineschool.com/problem-deep-enough/
imagining all people free to grok/do what matters to them. imagining all people assuming good. more offense. less defense.
(defense is a man made construct. as evidenced in research by people like Peter Gray.)
….pentagon trying to improve defense via a better weapon to win a war – rather tech that gives people something else to do, .. the generals got that.. but not clear what office in the pentagon is the office of preventive technology – Neil Gershenfeld our biggest defense – trusting that people are good ….and that most people want civilization to work
– Daniel Suarez
perhaps it’s not so much that we’re being observed.. but rather – it’s that judgmental assumption.. that control/oppression/fear/shame lurking over.. that keeps us from us. perhaps it’s not so much that we’re in danger.. but rather – it’s the danger of a single story.. that incompleteness taking over.. that keeps us from seeing each other.
imagining 100% of us not blinded/lost/angered/worn by the typical 7ish hours of supposed to’s ie: work/school/whatever
but instead were spending our days, the meat of our days, doing/being the thing we can’t not do/be. imagining we’d run out of time/concern to harm/steal/accuse/fight/hate/regulate/bicker/oppress /control…
let’s rewire\leapfrog everything else we keep trying– just keeps piling on more to defend/protect/regulate/protest‌
the state of being free.. from danger. [can that ever happen?]
how about.. the sate of being free.. to be.
leapfrogging in sync matters