2 0 1 3 - 1 4
UAB M E N ’ S
B A S K E T B A L L
2012-13 Conference USA Statistics SCORING OFFENSE ## Team 1. Houston 2. East Carolina 3. Memphis 4. Southern Miss 5. UAB 6. UCF 7. Tulane 8. Marshall 9. Tulsa 10. SMU 11. UTEP 12. Rice
G W-L Pts Avg/G 33 20-13 2578 78.1 35 23-12 2679 76.5 36 31-5 2681 74.5 37 27-10 2733 73.9 33 16-17 2357 71.4 31 20-11 2194 70.8 35 20-15 2436 69.6 32 13-19 2208 69.0 33 17-16 2241 67.9 32 15-17 2064 64.5 32 18-14 2042 63.8 31 5-26 1875 60.5
SCORING DEFENSE ## Team G Pts Avg/G 1. UTEP 32 1970 61.6 2. SMU 32 2007 62.7 3. Southern Miss 37 2348 63.5 4. Memphis 36 2337 64.9 5. Tulane 35 2299 65.7 6. UCF 31 2079 67.1 7. Tulsa 33 2249 68.2 8. Rice 31 2199 70.9 9. East Carolina 35 2484 71.0 10. UAB 33 2351 71.2 11. Marshall 32 2327 72.7 12. Houston 33 2420 73.3 SCORING MARGIN ## Team 1. Southern Miss 2. Memphis 3. East Carolina 4. Houston 5. Tulane 6. UCF 7. UTEP 8. SMU 9. UAB 10. Tulsa 11. Marshall 12. Rice
G OFF DEF Margin 37 73.9 63.5 +10.4 36 74.5 64.9 +9.6 35 76.5 71.0 +5.6 33 78.1 73.3 +4.8 35 69.6 65.7 +3.9 31 70.8 67.1 +3.7 32 63.8 61.6 +2.2 32 64.5 62.7 +1.8 33 71.4 71.2 +0.2 33 67.9 68.2 -0.2 32 69.0 72.7 -3.7 31 60.5 70.9 -10.5
FREE THROW PERCENTAGE ## Team G FTM FTA Pct 1. SMU 32 493 662 .745 2. Tulane 35 634 872 .727 3. Rice 31 358 493 .726 4. UAB 33 424 586 .724 5. East Carolina 35 561 784 .716 6. Houston 33 555 782 .710 7. Southern Miss 37 518 746 .694 8. UTEP 32 453 669 .677 9. Tulsa 33 514 767 .670 10. Memphis 36 509 771 .660 11. UCF 31 438 680 .644 12. Marshall 32 476 796 .598 FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE ## Team G 1. Southern Miss 37 2. Memphis 36 3. Houston 33 4. UCF 31 5. East Carolina 35 6. UTEP 32 7. SMU 32 8. Tulsa 33
FG FGA Pct 985 2058 .479 976 2071 .471 912 1965 .464 768 1695 .453 922 2039 .452 706 1571 .449 729 1624 .449 763 1760 .434
9. UAB 10. Marshall 11. Tulane 12. Rice
33 32 35 31
857 1980 .433 767 1796 .427 789 1896 .416 644 1621 .397
FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct 1. SMU 32 655 1657 .395 2. Memphis 36 825 2038 .405 3. Southern Miss 37 775 1895 .409 4. Tulsa 33 755 1839 .411 5. UTEP 32 705 1689 .417 6. UCF 31 785 1840 .427 7. East Carolina 35 922 2142 .430 8. Houston 33 871 2021 .431 9. Marshall 32 824 1871 .440 10. UAB 33 816 1848 .442 11. Tulane 35 830 1816 .457 12. Rice 31 764 1558 .490 3-POINT FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE ## Team G FG FGA Pct 1. Tulsa 31 178 463 .384 1. Southern Miss 37 245 645 .380 2. Memphis 36 220 592 .372 3. Houston 33 199 551 .361 4. UCF 31 220 616 .357 5. UTEP 32 177 504 .351 6. East Carolina 35 274 784 .349 7. Tulane 35 224 641 .349 8. SMU 32 113 328 .345 9. Tulsa 33 201 598 .336 10. UAB 33 219 655 .334 11. Rice 31 229 697 .329 12. Marshall 32 198 646 .307 3-POINT FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct 1. UCF 31 190 605 .314 2. Houston 33 214 671 .319 3. East Carolina 35 189 577 .328 4. Memphis 36 204 619 .330 5. Southern Miss 37 288 873 .330 6. Tulane 35 209 624 .335 7. Tulsa 33 229 678 .338 8. UTEP 32 165 486 .340 9. SMU 32 242 709 .341 10. UAB 33 215 604 .356 11. Rice 31 190 515 .369 12. Marshall 32 203 549 .370 REBOUNDING MARGIN ## Team G Avg OPP Margin 1. Southern Miss 37 35.7 30.2 +5.5 2. Tulane 35 35.3 31.2 +4.1 3. Memphis 36 37.5 33.5 +4.0 4. Houston 33 38.7 35.6 +3.2 5. SMU 32 33.8 31.2 +2.6 6. UCF 31 36.6 34.2 +2.4 7. UAB 33 36.7 35.0 +1.7 8. Tulsa 33 36.5 34.9 +1.6 9. Marshall 32 37.9 36.5 +1.4 10. East Carolina 35 35.9 37.6 -1.7 11. UTEP 32 31.4 33.2 -1.8 12. Rice 31 25.8 37.7 -11.9 BLOCKED SHOTS ## Team 1. Memphis 2. UCF
7 0
|
U A B
G Blocks Avg/G 36 231 6.42 31 141 4.55
B l a z e r s
3. Marshall 4. East Carolina 5. SMU 6. Houston 7. UTEP 8. Tulsa 9. Southern Miss 10. UAB 11. Tulane 12. Rice
32 35 32 33 32 33 37 33 35 31
145 4.53 156 4.46 132 4.13 127 3.85 118 3.69 101 3.06 101 2.73 85 2.58 66 1.89 32 1.03
ASSISTS ## Team 1. East Carolina 2. Memphis 3. UAB 4. Houston 5. Southern Miss 6. Marshall 7. UCF 8. UTEP 9. SMU 10. Tulsa 11. Tulane 12. Rice
G Assists Avg/G 35 603 17.23 36 605 16.81 33 529 16.03 33 500 15.15 37 551 14.89 32 448 14.00 31 431 13.90 32 428 13.38 32 383 11.97 33 389 11.79 35 402 11.49 31 351 11.32
STEALS ## Team 1. Southern Miss 2. Memphis 3. UAB 4. East Carolina 5. UCF 6. SMU 7. Houston 8. Tulane 9. Rice 10. Marshall 11. Tulsa 12. UTEP
G Steals Avg/G 37 356 9.62 36 321 8.92 33 269 8.15 35 279 7.97 31 233 7.52 32 220 6.88 33 221 6.70 35 233 6.66 31 204 6.58 32 207 6.47 33 213 6.45 32 171 5.34
ASSIST TO TURNOVER RATIO ## Team G Avg OPP Margin 1. East Carolina 35 17.2 12.7 1.36 2. Memphis 36 16.8 14.5 1.16 3. Houston 33 15.2 13.1 1.15 4. UTEP 32 13.4 12.4 1.08 5. UAB 33 16.0 15.5 1.04 6. Rice 31 11.3 11.2 1.01 7. Southern Miss 37 14.9 14.7 1.01 8. UCF 31 13.9 13.8 1.01 9. Tulane 35 11.5 12.3 0.93 10. Marshall 32 14.0 15.8 0.89 11. SMU 32 12.0 14.4 0.83 12. Tulsa 33 11.8 14.7 0.80 3-POINT FIELD GOALS MADE ## Team 1. East Carolina 2. Rice 3. UCF 4. UAB 5. Southern Miss 6. Tulane 7. Marshall 8. Memphis 9. Tulsa 10. Houston 11. UTEP 12. SMU
G 3FG Avg/G 35 274 7.83 31 229 7.39 31 220 7.10 33 219 6.64 37 245 6.62 35 224 6.40 32 198 6.19 36 220 6.11 33 201 6.09 33 199 6.03 32 177 5.53 32 113 3.53