www.el-observador.com | JULY 30 - AUG 5, 2010 |3|
Opinion
Building a Green Economy
T
he phrase "building a green economy" means different things to different people, but in general it refers to encouraging economic development that prioritizes sustainability, that is working with nature and not against it in the quest to meet peoples' needs and wants instead of disregarding environmental concerns in the process of growing the economy. The primary way governments around the world are trying to "green" their own economies today is by increasing investment in, and by, extension creating jobs in industries on the cutting edge of nonpolluting renewable forms of energy, such as solar and wind power. President Obama has repeatedly invoked his vision of a green economy as a tool for helping the U.S. lift itself out of the recession and positioning itself as an economic powerhouse in a carbon-constrained future. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, the $787.2 billion stimulus package that Congress signed into law in 2009, was chock full of provisions to boost renewable energy, energy efficiency and environmental restoration initiatives. Examples include $4.5 billion to convert government buildings into highperformance green buildings, $8.4 billion for investments in public transportation, and tens of billions of dollars more for research into new technologies to amplify existing efforts. ARRA also earmarked $11 billion for the implementation of the "smart grid," a new approach to power distribution that will bring more clean energy sources into the mix and promote energy efficiency. Infusing such huge amounts of cash into sustainability-oriented projects is one way the Obama administration hopes to "green" the U.S. economy while simultaneously pulling the country out of
recession. "To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy," Obama told Congress a few months ago. Of course, Americans aren't the only ones bent on building a green economy. During the 1980s and 1990s, while the American government was largely asleep at the wheel on environmental issues, countries such as Denmark, Germany, Spain and Japan were already busy investing in wind and solar research and implementation. And while these nations' ongoing efforts are nothing to sneeze at, economists point out that what is most needed is action on the part of the world's fastest growing economies, China and India. A recent report by the consulting firm McKinsey & Company found that China, which surpassed the U.S. as the world's largest generator of greenhouse gases three years ago, has great potential for building a green economy over the coming decades. According to McKinsey, by 2030 China could reduce its oil and coal imports by up to 40 percent and its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by investing upwards of 1.5 trillion yuan ($220 billion in U.S. dollars) per year in both existing and new green technologies. China has begun to see the light with regard to reducing emissions, increasing energy efficiency and embracing renewable alternative energy, but it has yet to make significant financial commitments, which will be key to both warding off catastrophic climate change and building a truly global green economy. (Information provided by Earth Talk, The Enviromental Magazine.)
Ocurrielcias
PUBLISHERS: HILBERT & BETTY MORALES HMORALES@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM A weekly newspaper serving Latinos in the San Francisco Bay Area. P.O. Box 1990, San Jose, CA 95109 99 N. First Street, Suite 100, San Jose, California 95113
ADVERTISING/PROMOTION DIRECTOR MONICA AMADOR,COO SALES@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM
SALES DEPARTMENT JAIME LARIOS JAIME@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM ANGELICA ROSSI ANGELICA@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM WIL CHAVEZ WIL@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM
DISTRIBUTION CIRCULATION JAIME LARIOS JAIME@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM EDITORIAL: ROSARIO VITAL SPANISH.EDITOR@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM
SUBSCRIPTION INQUIRIES
REGARDING BIAS, BIGOTRY, PREJUDICE AND RACISM By Hilbert Morales
T
he reality is that bias, bigotry, prejudice and racism exist in our society and always will because each of us, as individuals, have the right to dislike, disapprove, decide not to have a relationship with, and be negative about another. The societal challenges begin when these issues are projected beyond the circle of associates into the workplace or into public policy. If each of us is really honest with our conscious self and uncouscious self, we each will admit that bias, bigotry, prejudice and racism exist within our being. These come into conflict eventually with the “Golden Rule” which states ‘do unto others as you woud have them do unto you.” Our personal projections and expectations are a product of our practices about what is right or wrong. Recently, what happened to an African American woman who had an outstanding professional record brings all of this, and more, into focus. That woman is Ms. Shirley Sherrod who resigned from her posiion in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) based on a video which grossly misrepresented statements made to an audience as the spokesperson of USDA Rural Development Program. A very conservatve video blogger had produced a video clip about Ms. Sherrod that Herman Goebel, the Nazi propaganda chief, would have been very proud of. Andrew Breithart was the blogger who first posted a misleading and highly edited video which was in turn picked up by Fox News Channel hosts Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity, and the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). This version of the news ended up in the USDA’s office and the White House, where the buck stops with our first African American President, Barrack Hussein Obama. USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack ordered Ms. Sherrod dismissal without verification of the facts and truth. Shame on all of you! Because your actions revealed your bias, bigotry, prejudice and racism. It turns out that after Ms. Sherrod resigned, a full examination occurred of the video of her consciousness raising presentation to the NAACP in Douglas, Georgia. Sherrod revealed that her father had been murdered by white men who were never indicted. In response Shirley decided to stay in the South as a social change agent. She married Rev. Charles Sherrod, a civil rights leader and cofounder of the Student NonViolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).
CONTRIBUTORS: MARIO JIMENEZ - HECTOR CURRIEL OSVALDO CASTILLO CINTHIA RODRIGUEZ
ACCOUNTING MARIA ESPINOZA-DURAN MARIA@EL-OBSERVADOR.COM (408) 938-1700 www.el-observador.com
GRAPHICS/WEB WILSON BARRIOS GRAPHICFACTORY@COMCAST.NET WWW.DSIGNSFACTORY.COM FELIX PACAS TECHNOLOGY WRITER
Later in her career, as Director of a Farmer’s Co-Op organized to assist Black farmers, she received a request for assistance from a White farmer named Roger Spooner. That request caused Shirley Sherrod to confront her own feelings about what had happened to her father. The White Spooners stepped up to her defense. Ms. Sherrod had not acted in a racist manner. On the contrary, Ms. Sherrod had done her job as a professional. The Spooners attested to the fact that Sherrod had gone out of her way to help them save their farm. If she had not helped them, they would have lost everything according to Eloise Spooner, Age 82. When the full facts of this matter became available, President Obama apologized, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack and the NAACP apologized, etc. Shirley Sherrod was even offered her job back. This story has several learning points which need to be stated clearly. First, The White House needs a staff member, who is professionally trained and is allowed to practice ‘old fashioned journalism reporting’ where the facts and truth of any matter are verified before any official action is taken. Second, many in our nation felt that the election of the first “Black President” was an indication of improved race relations in this nation. This is not true because, as a result of the current economy, many, especially those with limited resources and skills, are very anxious about their personal economic survival. This is especially true of small ethnic business owners who are systematically denied access to capital and credit needed by their businesses. The third point is that personally held bias, bigotry, prejudice and racism are elements within all of us. The challenge is to live up to the high standards of our religious beliefs, the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution as the law of the land. Each of us has inalienable rights, privileges and responsibilities. Each of us must not project the negativity of our own personal bias, bigotry, prejudice and racism upon our neighbor, especially in areas of competitive business and job relationships. Each of us is a unique individual whose humanity is established and supported by living in accordance with the Golden Rule: Do unto others what you would have them do unto you’. The challenge to live together in peace and tranquility is always before us. May God bless America.
EL OBSERVADOR was founded in 1980 to serve the informational needs of the Hispanic community in the San Francisco Bay Area, with special focus on San Jose, the capital of Silicon Valley. All Rights Reserved: No part of this publication may be transmitted or reproduced in any form or by any means, this includes photo copying recording, or by an information storage and retrieval systems, electronic or mechanical, without the express written consent of the publishers. Opinions espressed in El Observador by persons submitting articles are not necessarily the opinions of the publishers.