SOCIAL PROGRESS
A GLOBAL IMPERATIVE
"The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income" Simon Kuznets, Address to the U.S. Congress, 1934
"The Gross National Product counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and the jails for the people who break them. It counts the destruction of the redwood and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl. Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play.” Robert F. Kennedy, Speech at the University of Kansas, 1968
"In an increasingly performance-oriented society, metrics matter. What we measure affects what we do. If we have the wrong metrics, we will strive for the wrong things. In the quest to increase GDP, we may end up with a society in which citizens are worse off.” Mismeasuring Our Lives, Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi, 2010
What is social progress?
Why measure social progress?
We define social progress holistically, as the capacity of a society to meet the basic human needs of its citizens, establish the building blocks that allow citizens and communities to enhance and sustain the quality of their lives, and create the conditions for all individuals to reach their full potential. This definition is derived from a broad literature review and synthesis of ideas in a variety of fields.
If you don’t measure, it is hard to make the most rapid progress. More and more people recognize that GDP alone is not an adequate guide for national development strategies. The Social Progress Index brings a new rigor to this effort, not by changing the way GDP is measured but by creating a complementary lens on national performance.
Glob Glob
The first major effort of the Social Progress Imperative is the Social Progress Index, launched April 2013. Our goal is to measure social progress directly, Canada rigorously, and comprehensively using 3 dimensions, 12 componentsCanada and 52 social and environmental indicators. The first publication of the Social Progress Index quantifies levels of social progress for 50 countries. This sample is to be expanded to at least 100 countries in 2014. The Social Progress Index has the following five characteristics, which combine to distinguish it from previous efforts to measure wellbeing: United UnitedStates States
a) Based exclusively on non-economic indicators.
Mexico Mexico
b) Based exclusively on outcome indicators. c) Integrates a large number of indicators into an aggregate score of social progress. d) Model is structured to allow empirical investigation of relationships between dimensions,components and indicators. e) Breadth of indicators makes the model relevant for countries at all income levels.
Costa Co
GLOBAL
SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE
Social Progress and Economic Development
SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX
64.81 1 1. .Sweden 64.81 Sweden 63.41 63.41 2.2.United UnitedKingdom Kingdom Suecia 63.28 63.28 3.3.Switzerland Switzerland 62.63 4.4.Canada 62.63 Canada 62.47 62.47 5.5.Germany Germany 61.56 6.6.United UnitedStates States 61.56 61.26 7.7.Australia 61.26 Australia 61.01 8.8.Japan 61.01 Japan 60.7 9.9.France 60.7 France 60.43 10. 60.43 10.Spain Spain
1111. .So S 12. 12. C 1313. .PP 1414. .CC 15. 15.AA 16. 16.IsI 1717. .BB 18 18. . B 19. 19.UU 20. 20.TT
Etiopía
The TheSocial SocialProgress ProgressIndex Indexisisaacalculated calculate GDP/capita ($)
What does the Social Progress Index tell us about economic development? The only way to rigorously understand the relationship betweene conomic development and social progress is to exclude economic indicators from the measure of social progress. The Social Progress Index can bring more empirical rigor to the debate about ‘pro-poor’ or ‘inclusive’ growth. The Social Progress Index will help us understand how social progress is not just a result of economic growth; social progress can equally be a cause of economic growth. “There is a wide range of performance on social progress in this world, and it is not completely explained by economic success. There are very high-income countries that are not doing very well on social progress. There are relatively low-income countries that are doing remarkably well on social progress.” – Michael E. Porter. As expected, there is a broad correlation between economic development and social progress: Sweden is on top and Ethiopia at the bottom of the rankings. However there are big differences in social progress at similar income levels.
Social Progress and Human Development 70 Suecia
65
SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX
Reino Unido
60 Costa Rica
Chile Argentina Bulgaria
55 Brasil
50 Vietnam Morocco
45
República Dominicana Tailandia Filipinas Paraguay China
Indonesia
Gana Bangladesh
40
Senegal Mozambique
Rwanda
35
Kenya
Botswana Sudáfrica
Turquía
Colombia
Suiza Alemania Canadá Estados Unidos Australia Francia Japón Japón República de Corea
Polonia Israel
Emiratos Árabes Unidos
México Túnez Georgia Jordania Kazajistán Rusia Sri Lanka
Egipto
India
Uganda Nigeria
Etiopía
30
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
HDI
What does the Social Progress Index tell us about other wellbeing indices? There are no other indices that measure social progress directly, independently of economic development, in a way that is both holistic and rigorous. Most wellbeing indices, such as the Human Development Index or the OECD Better Life Indicators, are still heavily reliant on GDP or other economic measures. “We are not just looking at social progress in poor countries, we want to look at social progress in some holistic sense because we want to understand the whole trajectory of development, and what we can learn from countries at all stages in that process”. – Michael E. Porter The correlation between human development and social progress is very high. However, though the HDI covers 187 countries, the limited range of indicators means that its descriptive and explanatory value is limited for upper middle and high income countries, while the granularity of SPI´s model highlights key challenges ahead for countries that score well. For example, Sweden and all rich countries, score poorly on environmental sustainability.
Global Ranking of Canada
United Kingdom
Germ
France
S
Spain
United States
Tunisia
Morocco
Mexico Dominican Republic Senegal
Niger
Costa Rica
Ghana
Colombia
Brazil Peru
Chile
Paraguay
South
Argentina
1 . Sweden 2. United Kingdom 3. Switzerland 4. Canada 5. Germany 6. United States 7. Australia 8. Japan 9. France 10. Spain
64.81 63.41 63.28 62.63 62.47 61.56 61.26 61.01 60.7 60.43
11 . South Korea 12. Costa Rica 13 . Poland 14 . Chile 15. Argentina 16. Israel 17 . Bulgaria 18 . Brazil 19. United Arab Emirates 20. Turkey
59.86 57.36 56.92 56.6 56.32 54.79 54.08 52.27 50.89 50.69
21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.
Domin Colom Thailan Peru Mexico Philippi Paragu Tunisia Georgia Viet Na
The Social Progress Index is a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the low
ff Social Social Progress Progress Russia Russia
Sweden Sweden
Poland manyanyPoland Germ
Switzerland Switzerland
ria geria
thAfrica Africa
Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Bulgaria Bulgaria Georgia Georgia
Turkey Turkey
South SouthKorea Korea
Egypt Egypt
India India United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates
Bangladesh Bangladesh
Thailand Thailand
Philippines Philippines Viet Nam Viet Nam
Ethiopia Ethiopia
Uganda Uganda
Kenya Kenya Indonesia Indonesia
Australia Australia
Mozambique Mozambique Botswana Botswana
nican nicanRepublic Republic bia mbia nd and
o co ines pines uay guay aa a gia am Nam
Japan Japan
China China
Jordan Jordan Israel Israel
50.52 50.52 50.52 50.52 50.28 50.28 50 50 49.73 49.73 49.41 49.41 49.24 49.24 48.61 48.61 48.56 48.56 47.99 47.99
3131. .Jordan Jordan 32. 32.China China 33. 33.Russia Russia 34. 34.Kazakhstan Kazakhstan 35. 35. Botswana Botswana 36. 36.Sri SriLanka Lanka 37. 37.Morocco Morocco 38. 38.Indonesia Indonesia 39. 39.South SouthAfrica Africa 40. 40.Egypt Egypt
47.97 47.97 47.92 47.92 46.89 46.89 46.85 46.85 45.61 45.61 45.47 45.47 45.27 45.27 45.24 45.24 44.67 44.67 43.94 43.94
42.69 42.69 4141. .Ghana Ghana 39.59 42. 42.Bangladesh Bangladesh 39.59 39.51 39.51 43. 43.India India 39.3 39.3 44. 44.Senegal Senegal 38.98 38.98 45. 45.Kenya Kenya 36.29 46. 36.29 46.Rwanda Rwanda 47. 36.2 47.Mozambique Mozambique 36.2 35.91 48. 35.91 48.Uganda Uganda 33.39 33.39 49. 49.Nigeria Nigeria 32.13 32.13 50. 50.Ethiopia Ethiopia
west westscore scoreatatthe thenational nationallevel levelisisEthiopia’s Ethiopia’s32.1 32.1and andthe thehighest highestisisSweden’s Sweden’swith withaa64.8 64.8
Building a Global Network for Social Progress An actionable framework to guide social investment The Social Progress Index will help improve the ability of leaders to focus their efforts and investments in the policy areas that will have the greatest contribution to sustainably improving lives. The Social Progress Imperative will measure its success by the extent to wich it can reach policy makers, business leaders, civil society, international development organizations, impact investors and philanthropists to faster more and better public policies, responsible business strategies, social entrepreneurship, development programs and philanthropy.
Promoting local interpretation and dissemination The Social Progress Imperative will provide globally comparable data to a network of local partners and will serve as the hub of a strong network of prominent institutions in each country. The countries that are the best positioned to offer real and sustainable improvements in the well-being of their populations are those where goverment, the private sector and civil society work together to find solutions to social and enviromental challenges.
From identifying challenges to sharing solutions In deph diagnostics will accompany the Social Progress Index to provide more detailed information on how to approach improving social outcomes. These will be related to specific results in the areas of health, security, education and opportunity as well as countries’ capacity to support and scale up social innovation. When combined, the measures will help a country determine its priority challenges, the root causes of those challenges and the strengths and limitations of a country’s institutions for addressing those challenges. These measures will provide a structure for capturing knowledge on promising innovations as well as how successful ideas may need to be adapted for different country contexts.
REGIONAL
SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE
Diversity inin Diversity the Americas the Americas
70
70
RWA MZB UGA NGA ETH
30
Africa
30
SEN KEN
CRI CHI ARG ISR
ISR
BRAARE COL TUN DOM PERJOR MEX PRYMOR EGY
ARE TUN JOR MOR EGY
BGD IND
RWA MZB UGA NGA ETH
RegionsRegions
Middle East / NorthOceania Africa (Australia)
SEN KEN
BGD IND
BGR BRA COL TURDOM GIA PER RUSMEX PRY
AUS
Latin America Middle East / North Africa
40
GHA
TAI TUR PHL GIA VNMRUS CHN KAZ LK INS
SWE UK CHE DEU FRACRI ESPCHI POLARG
Europe Latin America
GHA
BRATAI COLPHL VNM DOM PERCHN MEXKAZ PRYLK INS
BGR
Asia Europe
BWA SDA
CANJPN KDR EEUU CRI CHI ARG
Americas Asia
40
50
BRA COL DOM PER MEX PRY BWA SDA
Africa Americas
50
60 Social Progress Index
Social Progress Index
60
CAN EEUU CRI CHI ARG
SWE UK CHE JPN DEU KDRFRA ESP POL
The Social Progress Index is a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the lowest The Social Progress Index is a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the low score at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 and the highest is Sweden’s with a 64.8 score at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 and the highest is Sweden’s with a 64.8
Basic Human Needs Needs Basic Human 45,4
43,5
43,2
PRY
COL
45,4
43,5
PRY
44,1
28,1
COL
43,2
PER
USA
PRY
CAN
60,8
USA
USA 66,2
PER
Shelter
USA 66,2
CAN 70,2
50
Basic Human Needs Basic Human Needs Nutrition and Basic Nutrition and Basic Medical Care Medical Care Air, Water, and Sanitation Air, Water, and Sanitation
63,8
CAN 61,3
60,8
COL
0
63,8
CAN 61,3
PRY
44,1
28,1
CAN
COL
CAN 70,2
100
50
Shelter
Personal Safety Personal Safety 100
oundations of Wellbeing Foundations of Wellbeing 47,5
46,7
43,0
PRY
47,5
PRY
46,7
PRY
43,0
55,7
CAN CAN
PRY
CAN
CAN
USA 65,8
COL
21,9 USA
50
0
65,0
68,7
50,7 PER
Foundations of Wellbeing Foundations of Wellbeing Access to basic Access to basic knowledge knowledge Access to information and Access to information and communications communications Health and Wellness Health and Wellness
55,7
65,0
CAN
PRY
50,7 PER
21,9 USA
CAN PRY
68,7
USA 65,8 58,9
COL
58,9
100
50
Ecosystem Sustainability Ecosystem Sustainability 100
Opportunity Opportunity 47,8
50,0
43,6
BRA
45,5
USA MEX
P COL
CAN 69,1 COL P
43,6
50,5
69,9
MEX 47,8
MEX
PER P
50,0
69,9
50,5
CRI 69,4 MEX
PER P
CAN 74,1
Opportunity Opportunity Personal Rights Personal Rights
CAN 69,1 USA 78,1
BRA
45,5
USA
USA 78,1
CRI 69,4 CAN 74,1
Access to Higher Access to Higher Education Education Personal Freedom and Personal Freedom and Choice Choice Equality and Inclusion Equality and Inclusion
50 100 0 50 100 e Social Progress Index is a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the lowest
The Social Progress Index is a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the lowest re at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 and the highest is Sweden’s with a 64.8 score at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 and the highest is Sweden’s with a 64.8
Social Progress in the Americas Social Progress 7. Colombia 1. Canada in the Americas 2. United States 3. Costa Rica 4. Chile 5. Argentina
4. Chile Chile 4. 10. Mexico Mexico 11. Paraguay10. 5. Argentina Argentina 5. 11. Paraguay Paraguay 6. Brazil Brazil 11. 6.
6. Brazil
GLOBAL RANKING
8. Dominican Dominican Republic 8. Republic 1. Canada Colombia 1. Canada 7.7. Colombia 9. Peru 2. United United States 2. 9. States Peru 8. Dominican Dominican Rep. Rep. 8. 3. Costa Costa Rica 3. Rica 10. Peru 10. Mexico Mexico 9.9. Peru
GLOBAL GLOBAL COUNTRY RANKING RANKING
4
CANADA
6
UNITED STATES 66
12
COSTA RICA
14
SOCIAL PROGRESS COUNTRY COUNTRY INDEX
SOCIAL BASIC HUMAN SOCIAL PROGRESS NEEDS PROGRESS INDEX (RANKING) INDEX
FOUNDA BASIC HU H BASIC OF WELL NEED NEED (RANK (RANKI
CANADA 62,6 CANADA
63,9 62,6(3) 62,6
55,74 63,9 ( 63,9
61,6 UNITEDSTATES STATES UNITED
62,3 61,6(7) 61,6
52,49 62,3 ( 62,3
12 12
57,4 COSTARICA RICA COSTA
54,8 57,4(19) 57,4
54,9 (( 54,8 (1 54,8
CHILE
14 14
CHILE CHILE
56,6
56,6 (15) 56,6 56,6
54,89 56,6 (( 56,6
15
ARGENTINA
15 15
56,3 ARGENTINA ARGENTINA
51,8 (24) 56,3 56,3
55,7 (1 51,8 (2 (2 51,8
18
BRAZIL
18 18
BRAZIL 52,3 BRAZIL
48,2 (30) 52,3 52,3
51,6 48,2(2 ( 48,2 (3
21
COLOMBIA
21 21
50,5 COLOMBIA COLOMBIA
45,4 (38) 50,5 50,5
50,51 45,4 (3 ( 45,4
22
22 22 DOMINICANA REP.
50,5 REP. DOMINICANA REP. DOMINICANA
48,2 (31) 50,5 50,5
49,8 48,2(2 48,2 ((
24
PERU
24 24
PERU PERU
50
46,6 50(33) 50
51,89 46,6 (3 (( 46,6
25
MEXICO
25 25
MEXICO 49,7 MEXICO
49,3 (29) 49,7 49,7
50,79 49,3 (2 (( 49,3
27
PARAGUAY
27 27
49,2 PARAGUAY PARAGUAY
47 (32) 49,2 49,2
47,49 47 (3 (3( 47
44
The Social Progress isProgress a calculated score 0-100, TheIndex Social Progress Index is aabetween calculated scorewhere betwei The Social Index is calculated score betwe score at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 the highest Sweden’s score at the the national level leveland is Ethiopia’s Ethiopia’s 32.1isand and the hig hig score at national is 32.1 the
63,9 68,3
62,6
63,9 63,9 55,7
68,3 68,3
62,6 62,6
Social Progress Index Social Progress Index
55,7 55,7
Basic Human Needs CANADA
CANADA CANADA
62,3 61,6
Basic Human Needs
Foundations of Wellbeing Foundations of Wellbeing Opportunity
Opportunity
48,2
48,2 48,2
62,3 62,3 52,2
69,9 69,9
ED STATES
61,6 61,6
52,2 52,2
UNITED STATES STATES UNITED
49,3
49,3 49,3
49,7
49,7 49,7
49,1
50,8
50,8 50,8
49,1 49,1
50,5 49,8
53,6
MEXICO
MEXICO MEXICO
53,6 53,6
DOMINICANA REP.
62,4
54,8 54,8 45,4 54,9
62,4 50,5 62,4 50,5 56,6
COSTA RICA
ATIONS ATIONS TUNITY LBEING LBEING KING) KING) KING)
OPPORTUNITY OPPORTUNITY (RANKING) (RANKING)
(11) 44(8) (11)
68,3 (8) (8) 68,3
(1) 92(16) (16)
69,92 (1) (1) 69,92
3(13) (8) (13)
62,43 (8) (8) 62,43
9(13) (14) (14)
58,31 (13) (13) 58,31
(9) (12) (12)
61,41 (9) (9) 61,41
5(20) (16) 20)
56,95 (16) (16) 56,95
3(27) (17) (27)
56,63 (17) (17) 56,63
(18) (28) (28)
53,55 (18) (18) 53,55
9(22) (19) (19)
51,53 (22) (22) 51,53
(25) (23) (23)
49,08 (25) (25) 49,08
(19) (32) (32)
53,25 (19) (19) 53,25
west in practice the lowest in s with with a 64.8
49,8 49,8
DOMINICANA REP. REP. DOMINICANA
54,8 57,4
50,5 50,5
57,4 57,4
45,4 45,4 54,9 54,9 56,6 56,6
COSTA RICA RICA COSTA COLOMBIA
46,6
46,6 46,6
50
50 50
51,5
50,5 50,5
51,9
PERU PERU
56,6 56,6 58,3
54,9 51,8
CHILE
56,3 61,4
48,2
48,2 48,2
COLOMBIA COLOMBIA
52,3
52,3 52,3
51,6
57
51,6 51,6
57 57
BRAZIL
BRAZIL
51,9 51,9
51,5 51,5
PERU
50,5 50,5
47
47 47
56,6 56,6 49,2 56,6 56,6 47,5 53,3 54,9 54,9 58,3 58,3
49,2 49,2 53,3 53,3 51,8 51,8
PARAGUAY CHILE CHILE 55,7
ARGENTINA
61,4 61,4
56,3 56,3
47,5 47,5
PARAGUAY 55,7 55,7
ARGENTINA ARGENTINA
The Social Progress Index Model The Social Progress Index is an aggregate index of 52 social and environmental indicators that capture three dimensions of social progress: basic human needs, foundations of wellbeing, and opportunity. The model generates a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the lowest score at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 and the highest is Sweden’s with a 64.8.
Social Progress Index
Basic Human Needs
Foundations of Wellbeing
Opportunity
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care
Access to Basic Knowledge
Personal Rights
Air, Water and Sanitation
Access to Information and Communications
Access to Higher Education
Shelter
Health and Wellness
Personal Freedom and Choice
Personal Safety
Ecosystem Sustainablility
Equity and Inclusion
Are the building blocks in place for individuals and communities to enhance and sustain wellbeing?
Is there opportunity for all individuals to reach their full potential?
Does a country provide for its people’s most essential needs?
The Index has four key design principles: • Exclusively social and environmental indicators: our aim is to measure social progress directly, rather than through economic proxies. • Outcomes not inputs: our aim is ti measure the things that matter to the lives of real people. • Actionability: we want the index to be a practical tool that will help society’s changemakers to implement policies and programs that will drive faster social progress. • Relevance to all countries: our aim is to create a holistic measure of social progress that is useful to countries at all levels of income.
The Social Progress Index Model The Social Progress Index is an aggregate index of 52 social and environmental indicators that capture three dimensions of social progress: basic human needs, foundations of wellbeing, and opportunity. The model generates a calculated score between 0-100, where in practice the lowest score at the national level is Ethiopia’s 32.1 and the highest is Sweden’s with a 64.8.
Social Progress Index
Basic Human Needs
Foundations of Wellbeing
Opportunity
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care
Access to Basic Knowledge
Personal Rights
Air, Water and Sanitation
Access to Information and Communications
Access to Higher Education
Shelter
Health and Wellness
Personal Freedom and Choice
Personal Safety
Ecosystem Sustainablility
Equity and Inclusion
Are the building blocks in place for individuals and communities to enhance and sustain wellbeing?
Is there opportunity for all individuals to reach their full potential?
Does a country provide for its people’s most essential needs?
The Index has four key design principles: • Exclusively social and environmental indicators: our aim is to measure social progress directly, rather than through economic proxies. • Outcomes not inputs: our aim is ti measure the things that matter to the lives of real people. • Actionability: we want the index to be a practical tool that will help society’s changemakers to implement policies and programs that will drive faster social progress. • Relevance to all countries: our aim is to create a holistic measure of social progress that is useful to countries at all levels of income.
ogress
COSTA RICA
Russia
Japan
China
South Korea Bangladesh
Thailand
Philippines Viet Nam
Indonesia
Australia
SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE
historia UnaUna historia de i
El Perfil país Rica para presenta Costa Rica presenta varias oportunidades de varias mejoríaáreas. en varia El Perfil de país paradeCosta varias oportunidades de mejoría en En Acceso a tratamiento de aguas Satisfacción residuales, Satisfacción convivienda, estado de viv homicidios, homicidios, Acceso a tratamiento de aguas residuales, con estado de Muer Enlos el caso de los Fundamentos delCosta Bienestar, Costamejorar Rica debe mejorar su alimentario. alimentario. En el caso de Fundamentos del Bienestar, Rica debe su Matrícula e Suscripciones telefonía móvil,ecológica y su huelladel ecológica delEnconsumo. En el componen Suscripciones de telefoníade móvil, y su huella consumo. el componente de Oport
Necesidades Humanas Básicas Necesidades Humanas Básicas
Nutrición cuidado médico básico Nutrición y cuidado médico ybásico 58,7 (16th) Aire, agua y saneamiento Aire, agua y saneamiento 53,17 (25th) Vivienda Vivienda 52,64 (26th) Seguridad personal Seguridad personal 54,48 (20th)
57.5 Nutriciónmédicos y calidad de servicios médicos Nutrición y calidad de servicios Mortinatalidad Mortinatalidad Prevalencia de tuberculosis Prevalencia de tuberculosis Desnutrición Desnutrición Tasa de mortalidad infantil Tasa de mortalidad infantil Tasa de mortalidad materna Tasa de mortalidad materna
Fundamentos Fundamentos de Bienestar de Bie
58,7 (16th)
Accesobásico a conocimiento b Acceso a conocimiento Acceso a información y c Acceso a información y comunicación Salud y Bienestar Salud y Bienestar Sostenibilidad Sostenibilidad de ecosistemas de ecosis
53,17 (25th) 52,64 (26th) 54,48 (20th)
57.5
100
100 Salud y Bienestar
Salud y Bienestar
Muertes por enfermedades Muertes por enfermedades Esperanza de Vida Esperanza de Vida Muertes por VIH
Muertes por VIH
Acceso a cuidado médico de calidad Acceso a cuidado médico de calidad Tasa de Tasa de muertes por cáncer muertes por cáncer
Déficit alimenticio
Déficit alimenticio
Seguridad personal
Seguridad personal
Sostenibilidad de Ecosistemas Sostenibilidad de Ecosistemas
Terror Político
Terror Político
Uso de energía por $1,000/PIB Uso de energía por $1,000/PIB Emisiones de C02 per cápita Emisiones de C02 per cápita
Cantidad de crímenes violentos Cantidad de crímenes violentos Percepción de la Criminalidad Percepción de la Criminalidad Tasa de Homicidio
Tasa de Homicidio
Obesidad
Obesidad
Huella ecológica del Consumo Huella ecológica del Consumo Uso de agua per cápitaUso de agua per cápita
Aire, agua y servicios higiénicos Aire, agua y servicios higiénicos Muertes porexterior contaminación de aire exterior Muertes por contaminación de aire
a información y comunicaci Acceso a información yAcceso comunicación Índice de libertad de prensa Índice de libertad de prensa
Acceso a agua potable Acceso a agua potable a instalaciones de saneamiento de calidad Acceso a instalaciones deAcceso saneamiento de calidad
Usuarios de Internet
Muertes porconfinado contaminación de aire confinado Muertes por contaminación de aire Acceso urbano / rural a fuentes de agua de calidad Acceso urbano / rural a fuentes de agua de calidad tratamiento de aguas negras Acceso a tratamiento deAcceso aguas anegras Vivienda
Vivienda
Acceso a la electricidad Acceso a la electricidad Satisfacción con condiciones de vivienda Satisfacción con condiciones de vivienda
Usuarios de Internet
Suscripciones a banda ancha fijas Suscripciones a banda ancha fijas Suscripciones de telefonía móvil Suscripciones de telefonía móvil Acceso a EducaciónAcceso Básica a Educación Básica Tasa Tasa de alfabetismo adultade alfabetismo adulta
Promedio de educación de las Promedio de años de educación dede lasaños mujeres
Matrícula Matrícula en eduación primariaen eduación primaria Matrícula en educación secunda Matrícula en educación secundaria
* Puntuación del país,es donde mínimo100, es 0seguido y el máximo seguido por (entre el Ranking Global (entre paréntesis) * Puntuación del país, donde el mínimo 0 y elelmáximo por el100, Ranking Global paréntesis)
inversión social ersión social
el componente de Necesidades Humanas Básicas, Costatrabajar Rica debe trabajar ente de Necesidades Humanas Básicas, Costa Rica debe en su Tasa en de su Tasa de rtes por contaminación del aire enAcceso interiores, Acceso fuentes aguayde taminación del aire en interiores, a fuentes deaagua de de calidad el calidad déficit y el déficit en educación secundaria, Matrícula en educación primaria, Obesidad, Uso de Agua per cápita, n secundaria, Matrícula en educación primaria, Obesidad, Uso de Agua per cápita, unidad, país debe el deTrato mejorar el Trato respetuoso hacia las mujeres aís debeelde mejorar respetuoso hacia las mujeres
7.5
OportunidadesOportunidades
49,87 (31st)
Derechos Individuales 63,86 (10th) Derechos Individuales Acceso a educación superior 52,02 (21st) Acceso a educación superior Libertades Individuales 69,37 (2nd) Libertades Individuales Equidad en inclusión Equidad en inclusión 64,46 (10th)
54,68 (17th) 59,8 (13th) 55,26 (20th)
57.5
100
100 Libertad Personal y de escoger Libertad Personal y de escoger Libertad de de vida sobre decisiones de vida Libertad de sobre decisiones Libertades religiosas Libertades básicas religiosas básicas Tasa de prevalencia de anticonceptivos Tasa de prevalencia de anticonceptivos Acceso a cuidado infantil Acceso a cuidado infantil Igualdad e inclusión Igualdad e inclusión Igualdad oportunidad para minorías Igualdad de oportunidad para de minorías Tolerancia hacía los homosexuales Tolerancia hacía los homosexuales de comunicación social Red de comunicaciónRed social Tolerancia hacia inmigrantes Tolerancia hacia inmigrantes Respeto hacia las mujer Respeto hacia las mujer Derechos personalesDerechos personales Libertad de expresiónLibertad de expresión Derechos políticos Derechos políticos Derecho de asociación Derecho de asociación Derechos de propiedad de las mujeres Derechos de propiedad de las mujeres Derechos de la propiedad privada Derechos de la propiedad privada Acceso a educación Acceso superiora educación superior femenina a nivel terciario Matricula femenina a Matricula nivel terciario Matricula en enseñanza terciaria Matricula en enseñanza terciaria
63,86 (10th) 52,02 (21st) 69,37 (2nd) 64,46 (10th)
57.5
57.5 100
100
39.59 39.51 39.3 38.98 36.29 e 36.2 35.91 33.39 32.13
with a 64.8
El progreso social en Costa Rica
54
(19
57.
(12.
62.4 (8.˚)
Fortalezas ■ Subnutrición
1.˚
■ Tasa de Prevalencia de Tuberculosis
11.˚
■ Expectativa de vida
12.˚
■ Libertades religiosas básicas
1.˚
■ Libertad sobre decisiones de vida
3.˚
■ Tasa de prevalencia de anticonceptivos
4.˚
■ Derechos de Propiedad de la Mujer
1.˚
■ Libertad de asamblea y asociación
1.˚
■ Libertad de expresión
1.˚
■ Equidad de oportunidades para minorías
1.˚
Datos generales
PIB/cápita ($)
Población (2011)
4,726,575 (48th)
PIB / CAPITA Expectativa de Vida
4.8
9.˚)
Índice de alfabetismo
12,157 (23ro) 78 años 95 %
* # ranking /# número de países por índice
7.4
2.˚)
54.9 (13.˚)
Índice de Progreso Social Necesidades básicas Fundaciones de bienestar Oportunidades
Debilidades ■ Tasa de homicidios ■ Acceso a tratamiento de aguas negras
37.˚ 37.˚
■ Satisfacción con estado de vivienda
33.˚
■ Muertes por aire confinado contaminado
28.˚
■ Acceso a fuentes de agua de calidad
27.˚
■ Déficit alimentario
27.˚
■ Matrícula en educación secundaria
39.˚
■ Obesidad
37.˚
■ Uso de agua per cápita ■ Suscriptores de telefonía móvil
34.˚ 34.˚
■ Matrícula en educación primaria
32.˚
■ Huella ecológica del consumo
25.˚
■ Trato respetuoso de mujeres
45.˚
Social Progress Index Indicators Índice de Progreso Social Necesidades humanas básicas
Fundamentos del Bienestar
Nutrición y cuidado médico básico
Acceso a conocimiento básico
Aire, agua y saneamiento de aguas
Acceso a información y comunicación
• • • • • •
Desnutrición Profundidad de déficit alimentario Tasa de mortalidad maternal Tasa de mortalidad prenatal Tasa de mortalidad infatil Prevalencia de tuberculosis
• Muertes atribuidas a la contaminación del aire interior • Muertes por contaminación del aire exterior • Acceso a sistemas de agua por cañería • Acceso rural/urbano a fuentes de agua de calidad • Acceso a facilidades de sanitación de calidad • Acceso al tratamiento de aguas residuales
Vivienda
• Acceso asequible a viviendas • Acceso a la electricidad
Seguridad personal • • • •
Tasa de homicidio Nivel de crimen violento Percepción de criminalidad Terror político
• Tasa de alfabetización adulta • Tasa de matrícula primaria • Tasa de matrícula secundaria • Promedio de escolaridad femenina
Oportunidad Derechos individuales
• Derechos políticos • Libertad de expresión • Libertad de asociación • Respeto a la propiedad privada • Respeto a la propiedad de la mujer
• Suscripciones a teléfonos celulares • Usuarios de internet • Suscripciones a banda ancha • Índice de la libertad de prensa
Acceso a educación superior
Salud y bienestar
Libertades individuales
Sostenibilidad de ecosistemas
Equidad en inclusión
• • • • • •
• • • •
Expectativa de vida al nacer Obesidad Tasa de mortalidad por cáncer Muerte Tasa de mortalidad por VIH Calidad de servicios médicos
Huella ecológica de consumo Emisiones de C02 por cápita Uso de energía por $1,000/PIB Uso de agua por cápita
Why this level of disaggregation? As we wanted the Index to be a practical tool for policy and social innovation it has been structured around 12 ‘components’ and 52 indicators to give the necessary granularity of analysis, not just an aggregate score or rank. By structuring the Index in this way, we believe that it will help changemakers identify and act upon the most pressing issues their societies face.
• Tasa de matrícula terciaria • Tasa de matrícula terciaria femenina
• Libertad de culto • Tasa de uso de anticonceptivos • Acceso a cuidado infantil • Libertad de escoger estilo de vida
• Equidad de oportunidad para minorías • Trato respetuoso de la mujer • Redes de apoyo comunitario • Tolerancia de inmigrantes • Tolerancia de homosexuales
How did we choose the indicators? For each of the components of the model we conducted literature searches and then did an extensive search for suitable indicators. From a long list of possible indicators we then tested for internal validity (does the indicator capture what it purports to measure?) and geographical availability (is the indicator available and reasonably up to date for most or all of our countries?).
Social Progress Imperative THE SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE IS A NON FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION WHOSE GOAL IS TO ADVANCE GLOBAL HUMAN WELLBEING AND IMPROVE THE LIVES OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD, BY HELPING DECISION-MAKERS IN GOVERNMENT, THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND CIVIL SOCIETY TO IDENTIFY PRESSING SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND TO COLLABORATE MORE EFFECTIVELY TO EFFECT LARGE SCALE CHANGE.
Advisory Board
Board of Directors
Michael E. Porter, Chair: Bishop William Lawrence Professor at Harvard Business School.
Brizio Biondi-Morra, Chair: Chair of Avina Americas, the sister organization of Fundación Avina in the United States.
Matthew Bishop: US Business Editor and New York Bureau Chief of The Economist.
Roberto Artavia Loría, Vice-Chair: President of VIVA Trust, Fundación Latinoamérica Posible, and President of INCAE Business School .
Hernando de Soto: President of the Institute for Liberty and Democracy in Lima, Peru.
Sally Osberg: President and Executive Director of the Skoll Foundation.
Judith Rodin: President of The Rockefeller Foundation.
Álvaro Rodríguez Arregui: Co-founder of IGNIA Partners, and Chair of Compartamos Banco.
Scott Stern: Chair of the Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Group at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
Tae Yoo: Vice President of Corporate Affairs and steward of Cisco’s Corporate Social Responsibility vision.
Ngaire Woods: Dean of the new Blavatnik School of Government and Professor of Global Economic Governance at the University of Oxford.
Heather Hancock: Managing Director, Brand & Communications, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
Contact : www.socialprogressimperative.org
@socprogress #socialprogress partner@social-progress.org