FAIR GAME
THE FINEST ARTISAN JEWELRY
WEDDING BANDS INDIVIDUAL WORKS OF ART
A
Smokin’ Mirrors
mong the few new taxes to win the Vermont House’s seal of approval last month was a pair targeting popular tobacco products. One would raise roughly $700,000 by taxing snuff and smokeless tobacco at a rate comparable to cigarettes. Another would raise $500,000 by creating a new, 92 percent tax on electronic cigarettes, a nicotine-based product used to simulate smoking. Gov. PETER SHUMLIN doesn’t think much of the proposals — and he’s hoping the Senate will, in its infinite wisdom, plot a different course as it finalizes its own tax bill in the coming weeks. The gov’s stance isn’t surprising, because he has consistently opposed most new sales and excise taxes. What is surprising is that, in explaining his position, Shumlin argues that there are potential health benefits to e-cigarettes — a claim not widely accepted by the public health community. “My own view on e-cigarettes is that we 102 Harbor Rd, Shelburne | 985-3190 should be cautious about taxing a product matthewtaylordesigns.net that we think might be gettin’ some folks off of tobacco,” he said at a recent press conference. “So, you know, I’m willing to Wedding Band Ads listen, but my own nonscientific research 8v-matttaylor042614.indd 1 4/18/14 11:26 AM Seven Days | 1/8th Page | 2.3" x 5.56" has found folks who are able to finally get 04.03.14 off tobacco products because they’re using e-cigarettes. I think the verdict’s still out on them.” The verdict may still be out, but plenty of jurors seem to think e-cigarettes are guilty. The World Health Organization, for one, said last year that “consumers should be strongly advised not to use” e-cigarettes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, meanwhile, found that e-cig use by middle and high school students doubled from 2011 to 2012, and calls to poison control centers — often involving young children — have skyrocketed. Closer to home, Shumlin’s own Vermont Department of Health appears to disagree with the conclusions of the governor’s “nonscientific research.” “The health department supports using proven [smoking] cessation methods, which e-cigarettes are not,” says RHONDA WILLIAMS, acting director of the department’s Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. According to Williams, the state believes e-cigarettes contribute to youths taking up tobacco, and she says higher excise taxes have been shown to reduce traditional cigarette use among adults and young people. “While it’s still early to say whether levying taxes on e-cigarettes will decrease state street, montpelier their use, there is acknowledgment that it will likely discourage use, especially 802 223 7800 14 FAIR GAME
SEVEN DAYS
04.23.14-04.30.14
SEVENDAYSVT.COM
PERSONALITY LOVE & BEAUTY
wine beer cafe
OPEN SEASON ON VERMONT POLITICS BY PAUL HEINTZ
among price-sensitive youth,” she says. But asked about the body of research contradicting his opinion, Shumlin said at the presser, “All I can tell you is that, anecdotally, I’ve spoken to folks who don’t feel that way. This is a new product, a relatively new product. I’m not sure that the first thing we should do is tax it out of existence.” “Even though it comes in flavors that appeal to children, like strawberry?” VTDigger’s ANNE GALLOWAY asked. “So does candy,” Shumlin responded. Which, um, was an interesting thing to say. Asked if he’d discussed the matter with any lobbyists, the gov said, “No. Not that I can recall.” Then he stopped himself and clarified: “I have not met with any lobbyists
MY OWN VIEW ON E-CIGARETTES IS THAT
WE SHOULD BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT TAXING A PRODUCT THAT WE THINK MIGHT BE GETTIN’ SOME FOLKS OFF OF TOBACCO. GOV. P E TE R SH UMLIN
in Vermont on this subject. We did have an education presentation on e-cigarettes at something I was at about how they’re made, what’s in ’em, who sells ’em. But I have not met with any lobbyists on this tax question in Vermont.” Pressed on the nature of the “education presentation,” Shumlin said he believed it took place at a meeting of the National Governors Association or the Democratic Governors Association. “I’ll get back to you on who it was,” he said. “I just don’t remember it that well. It was the last couple of years. I’ll find out. It’s the only education I’ve got about who’s making them, what they do, what’s in them.” Sure enough, Shumlin’s staff got back to us. Turns out the presentation went down just six weeks earlier, during a Washington, D.C., breakfast meeting hosted by the DGA. Shumlin, you might recall, serves as chairman of the organization. And who presented all that e-cigarette educatin’? Reynolds American, Inc., the second-largest tobacco company in the U.S. — and a major player in the $2 billionand-growing industry. How did Reynolds get an audience with the nation’s Democratic governors? A DGA spokesman didn’t respond to a
request for comment, but here’s one possibility: cash money. According to the DGA’s latest tax filing, Reynolds ponied up $15,000 to the organization just two days after that February “education presentation.” In total, Reynolds gave the DGA nearly $116,000 in the first quarter of the year. Rival e-cig purveyor Altria Client Services — the company formerly known as Philip Morris — dropped $25,000. Last year, during Shumlin’s first term as chairman, Reynolds and Altria gave the DGA $125,000 apiece. The industry has also given generously to Vermont politicians directly — and to political action committees run by Democratic and Republican legislative leaders. Last election cycle, Philip Morris gave $5,850 to 11 Vermont candidates, according to VTDigger’s campaign finance database, including a $3,000 donation to Shumlin. RAI gave the gov $2,000. It’s not exactly breaking news that the DGA relies upon unlimited contributions from its corporate and union members to support Democratic candidates for governor. Nor is it news that many of the DGA’s donors have plenty of business before the State of Vermont. In the past three months, for instance, the state’s prison contractor, CCA of Tennessee, gave $50,000 to the DGA. CGI Technologies and Solutions, which designed Vermont’s much-maligned health insurance exchange, gave $5,000 in March. (Last year, it gave $110,000.) The American Chemistry Council, which is currently fighting new toxic chemical regulations approved by the Vermont Senate, gave $25,000 late last month. When asked about his frequent trips to the DGA’s far-flung conferences, Shumlin typically argues that the connections he makes and the policy he discusses there benefit Vermonters. But if he’s really just hob-knobbing with tobacco company execs and digesting junk science at industry-sponsored “education presentations,” that doesn’t quite seem like a win. Will Shumlin end up signing a tax bill upping the price of e-cigarettes? $116,000 in tobacco cash says he won’t.
A Scheuer Thing?
Should a new survey conducted by the Castleton Polling Institute give Shumlin’s political advisers pause — or ease their anxieties? Commissioned by VTDigger, the poll found that 49 percent of the 682 people queried “approve of the job Peter Shumlin is doing as governor of Vermont,” while 40 percent disapprove. The remaining 11 percent said they weren’t sure or wouldn’t say. (The poll’s margin of error was plus or minus 4 percent.)