Higher uncertainty in the global economy means that it is prudent to prepare for catastrophic events. Recognizing the recurrent nature of economic and financial crises, the Bank Group’s Post-Crisis Directions Strategy has rightly identified managing risks and anticipating potential shocks and new crises as a key challenge for the Bank Group. Preparing for crises is particularly important, given the potentially extremely damaging consequences of a crisis in today’s globalized environment and the reduced IBRD capital headroom. The variation in development challenges across and within countries means that support needs to be finely tailored to specific country or regional needs. In turn, this points to the value of correctly diagnosing and addressing the binding constraints to development and poverty reduction, including those rooted in the political economy of the country or region in question. High-quality prior analytical work can also guide the Bank Group in mobilizing support from stakeholders, as well as in setting realistic targets for country programs and individual projects and in articulating results frameworks that embody clear steps toward meeting development objectives. The increasingly complex, interlinked nature of development solutions and the multiplicity of development actors points to the importance of looking beyond traditional boundaries. As the causes and effects of such issues as climate change and economic crises cut across national boundaries, there is a growing need for the Bank Group to support global and regional collective action. Synergies between the World Bank’s traditional public sector focus and the private sector focus of IFC and MIGA are becoming more valuable, given the growing complementarity of roles for public and private sector activity in development. And partnerships with other providers of development finance, as well as with other development actors, both international and recipient country based, are increasingly key to effective interventions. Among these challenges, the crucial link is the institutional focus on results. The common driver across these efforts is the orientation toward delivering development results. Addressing these diverse challenges requires the Bank Group to adapt flexibly to evolving needs among its clients. Results measurement and learning from experience are important means to help identify the ways to adjust the operational modalities and resource allocation to improve operational results.
Strengthening Quality at Entry, Progress Monitoring, and Work Quality Weak relevance of design, often in the form of overly ambitious objectives, frequently underlies less-than-satisfactory development outcome ratings for Bank projects. Improving realism and honing selectivity of project objectives is central to effective design. This is consistent with findings regarding country program effectiveness and the typical timeframe needed to achieve project objectives associated with recent operations that involve behavioral change.
Enhancing the Bank Group’s Effectiveness
49