Unitec Annual Report 2012

Page 1

Annual Report 2012


Unitec: A place for connection Unitec is a place where we aspire to connect highly productive talent to a world beyond learning, to jobs and careers.

The Annual Report is connected throughout the document to key video stories that we host on our website at www.unitec.ac.nz.

Initiatives like the IBM Delivery Centre are leading the way in our journey to being an institution that caters to the needs of employers and a workforce for today and the future.

You can use the QR code links, follow the URLs or get the overview within the printed document alone – but we encourage people to explore the connections that make up our whole story.


We connect to knowledge and opportunity, to industry and our community, to peers and learning.

1


Contents Chairman’s report

04

Potential 28

Performance activity and highlights

07

Cyber Security Research Centre

30

Big steps forward in sustainability

32

Creating possibilities

34

Research Symposium

36

Scholarships, awards and grants

36

Fast and furious filmmaking

37

Chief Executive’s report Performance activity and highlights

08 11

People 12 Māori Success Strategy

14

Meet Cameron – Carpentry graduate

16

Pacific Success Strategy

18

Expedition 18 Building an inclusive environment

19

Students 19

Place 20

Partnership 38 IBM partnership

40

Meet Mahsa – IT lecturer

42

India business development

44

Run Walk/adidas Auckland Marathon

46

Mt Albert campus

22

Sponsorships – Blues, Auckland Rugby, Mystics, V48 Hours and Outlook for Someday

47

Te Noho Kotahitanga Marae

24

Partnerships – Massey High School Trades Academy

47

Northern campus

26

Performance 48

Waitakere campus

26

Statement of Service Performance

50

Governance Report

66

Financial Statements

76

Appendices 132

2


12

20

28

38 3


4


Chairman’s report We can look back on 2012 with both a sense of achievement and optimism for the future. This year, an important focus for Unitec Council, along with the senior leadership group, has been to look at how we can accelerate the pace of our transformation. This has led to a range of new projects, but also substantial investment in a number of existing projects that will help us to move faster and make a greater contribution to our community. One of the most significant projects this year has been the agreement between Unitec and IBM to establish an IBM Delivery Centre at Unitec’s Mt Albert campus. This will provide hands-on, relevant professional experience for students while they are still studying, as well as a range of other benefits, including the introduction of an Earn As You Learn programme. This type of collaborative project with industry is an essential part of the contribution we can make as an institution. Not only does it provide students with the opportunity to gain valuable experience with a well-respected global company, it also provides a significant contribution to the Auckland and New Zealand economy. The establishment of our Cyber Security Research Centre, in collaboration with the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), is another example of our response to the changing education environment. Working with local businesses we have also established Tēpu, a joint venture with Rosebank Business Association. Tepū will work alongside businesses on projects that encourage innovation, build capacity and enhance competitiveness. It will also provide a range of business advisory services involving students and staff, such as business mentoring and coaching, strategic and business planning, tailored training and research.

As well as investing in these key projects designed to deliver new and innovative models, we have also continued to drive for greater participation and success of priority groups (Māori, Pacific and Under 25), and during 2012 we have seen a substantial increase in the number of Pacific students participating in our programmes. Our infrastructure investment programme has continued, with over $10 million invested in 2012. Part of this was spent on building Maanaki (the wharekai), which is a key part of the Unitec marae complex. We also invested in IT infrastructure projects, refurbishments, water reticulation improvements to enhance our disaster recovery capability and a range of other projects. We have continued to invest in our staff by engaging them in the strategic direction of Unitec and also undertook our biennial staff voice survey. This showed progress in terms of staff engagement and clarity of strategic direction while also identifying areas for future improvement. The external environment has continued to provide challenges for our students and the businesses who will be their future employers. The evolving Eurozone crisis, combined with an ongoing high New Zealand dollar, has continued to create uncertainty especially within the international environment. With the introduction of the Auckland Plan and the Auckland Economic Strategy there is now much greater clarity of the sectors and areas that will be the focus of future economic development. As a key education provider in the area, we have moved to align ourselves to those industries identified as growth areas, or those where gaps have been identified. This will become increasingly important throughout 2013 and beyond and was a substantial focus for the development of our 2013 – 2015 Investment Plan with the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC).

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

5


Another key domestic driver was the increasing pace of work on the Christchurch rebuild and the anticipated increase in demand for building work in Auckland. During the year we have done a considerable amount of work with Manukau Institute of Technology to help align our provision across Auckland. It was pleasing to see that, during 2012, despite this uncertain environment, we experienced a 1.4% growth in our overall equivalent full-time students (EFTS). This was the result of a 1.9% increase in our domestic EFTS and an 8.3% increase in EFTS funded from other sources. This increase in EFTS has coincided with an increase in the number of students choosing to study full-time. This lower-than-anticipated EFTS growth (there was a noticeable softening of student enrolments in the second half of 2012) and lower-than-anticipated income from external research, combined with higherthan-anticipated salary costs in two faculties, has led to a surplus in 2012 of $3.899 million. In spite of the surplus not meeting our expectations, Unitec has been able to continue to progress essential initiatives that position it well for the future. It was pleasing that Unitec was also able to retire its debt incurred for the construction of the Waitakere campus, and maintain good cashflow.

6

Our Northern campus in Albany, which was opened in 2011, has seen much higherthan-expected demand, with student numbers exceeding even our most optimistic expectations. In 2012, there were 481 EFTS. The growth of this new campus combined with the continuing development of our Waitakere campus in Henderson, has further focused our provision in the west, north and inner west of Auckland. This fits with our ongoing collaborative agreements with Manukau Institute of Technology and Te Whare Wananga o Awanuiarangi and the regional needs articulated in the Auckland Plan. During 2013, we are anticipating a further tightening of our financial position as a result of the reduction of government funding for level 1 and 2 programmes. As we move forward into 2013 and start reporting against our next TEC Investment Plan cycle we can see that, while the financial situation will remain tight, we are well positioned to build on our work with businesses to align our provision to their future needs.

This year has been productive, and I would like to thank my fellow Board members for their continuing contribution and commitment, and all of the staff whose dedication and drive to improve the experience of our students has helped to make this year such a success. I would also like to make a special mention of our many business and community partners without whose support we would not be able to offer the learning environment we do.

Eduard (Ted) van Arkel Unitec Council Chairman


Performance activity and highlights

1.4

%

INCREASE IN EQUIVALENT FULL-TIME STUDENTS

17

%

of SAC-funded student population identify as Pacific

74% of MÄ ori students successfully completed their course

67

%

of students see Unitec as environmentally responsible

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

7


8


Chief Executive’s report Over the course of 2012, the potential effects of a number of drivers of change in the global post-secondary education environment have become clearer in the New Zealand context. These drivers include: »» s ignificant debate about the value of higher education especially in terms of employment and employability, and for young people »» t he 'democratisation of knowledge'1 becoming tangible through, for example, the wave of massive online open courses launched over the past months »» t he ability of taxpayer funds to support public education infrastructure in light of future demand »» t he criticality of bridging the transition between compulsory and post-secondary education. During this year, Unitec’s Council and senior leadership group have been exploring how Unitec must continue to adapt and transform in this rapidly changing environment. At the same time, the past 12 months have seen substantial progress across the organisation and in our community at a time when we continue to operate in a challenging and uncertain environment. As the largest institute of technology in New Zealand, we have a significant contribution to make and at the heart of this contribution is the educational and employment success of our students. We have continued to make progress in both of these key indicators. It is particularly pleasing to see the steps being taken towards closing the achievement gap for Māori and Pacific learners, with the success rates of both of these groups improving faster than the institutional average, and the continuing high performance, in terms of participation, of these learners. Unitec’s student demographic

continues to be ahead of the long-term trend in the Auckland subregional demographic. Equity of success is a key long-term objective for Unitec as it is for most tertiary providers. We continue to focus on ensuring all programmes are engaging with, and responsive to, the needs of their learners, in other words that they engage with learners on the learners' terms. Intensive improvement actions were put in place in some environments, with a significant proportion of our programmes being redeveloped to incorporate active group learning and achieving the Living Curriculum Tick (an internal assessment of our education provision). We will continue to focus on achieving further improvement over 2013. We continue to benchmark our progress in this area through the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE) survey. The AUSSE has shown that Unitec has achieved very high ratings for active learning (well above both Australian and New Zealand benchmarks), and that our focus on increasing work-integrated learning experiences has begun to have traction, although more work is needed in this area. The biennial student satisfaction survey also showed a continuing high level of satisfaction among current students, with an overall satisfaction rating of 73%. The survey also reflected an increase in the number of students who indicated they would definitely recommend Unitec to others, up from 68% in 2010 to 75% in 2012. These findings were complemented by our graduate destination survey that showed 74% of graduates were in employment relevant to their area of study within three months of graduating. These employment outcomes have held up well in the face of a challenging employment environment, however, the Council and I view these outcomes as being nowhere near what should be achieved if we are producing consistently work-ready graduates from all employment-focused programmes. We are well into this journey but not yet at our final destination.

1. Ernst & Young, (2012). University of the Future: A thousand year old industry on the cusp of profound change. Ernst & Young, Australia.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

9


Collaboration is a cornerstone of our strategy and, as such, 2012 has been significant for the range and level of new collaborative initiatives. The biggest of these was the agreement with IBM to establish the first New Zealand-based IBM Delivery Centre at our Mt Albert campus. This will provide students from across Unitec with the opportunity to gain relevant work experience with a highly respected global brand. The relationship with IBM will also create 400 additional jobs and see the establishment of a range of additional areas of collaboration including research projects, Earn As You Learn programmes, scholarships, interns and guest lecturers. We also established the first New Zealand Cyber Security Research Centre in partnership with Japan’s NICT. This joint venture aims to conduct research and provide organisations around the country with state-of-the-art, cloud-computing-age cyber security technologies. In the area of health science, we launched the Āwhina Health Campus in partnership with the Waitemata District Health Board. This innovative joint venture creates a learning environment dedicated to student and staff inter-professional education, simulation, research collaboration and innovation. The campus was opened by the Hon Paula Bennett, Minister for Social

10

Development and Youth Affairs, and is designed to foster collaboration for health practitioners, community agencies and more than 1000 Unitec health science and social practice students in Waitakere. Following the launch in 2011 of Unitec’s Environmental Sustainability Strategy, 2012 has seen the introduction of sustainability as part of the curriculum in 19 programmes. Over the year, more than 1600 native plants have been planted as part of the restoration of the Wairaka Stream, we have replaced staff bins with desk-top mini bins, introduced composting, included green building features within the wharekai, and established a sustainable arboretum. This flood of activity from students, staff and the community has resulted in Unitec being recognised with the National Sustainable Business Trailblazer Not For Profit Award at the 2012 NZI National Sustainable Business Network Awards. All of these areas and achievements have been driven by staff, students and our wider community whose commitment and energy continue to provide inspiration. This year we have achieved a lot together, and I would like to thank all who have contributed for their passion and commitment.

We can also look forward in 2013 to new organisations joining us and adding their own value to our development, with the launch early in the new year of the IBM New Zealand Delivery Centre and the new initiatives and collaborations that it brings.

Rick Ede Chief Executive


Performance activity and highlights

75

%

of graduates would recommend Unitec

>90% of programmes now have embedded work-based learning

26

tonnes less paper was used at Unitec in 2012 compared with 2011

74% of graduates are in employment relevant to their area of study

19,014

m3

The volume that Unitec’s water consumption was lowered by in 2012 compared with 2011

82% of staff say they are satisfied with their job

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

11


74

%

of graduates are in employment relevant to their study

People are what Unitec is all about.

12


People Our students, our staff, our industry partners and our community are what make Unitec the vibrant, innovative and supportive learning environment it is. This year has been one of substantial achievements. Our students were finalists in the Microsoft Imagine Cup, we won a sustainability award, we received recognition for our equity, diversity and inclusion initiatives and our award-winning marketing campaigns. Unitec students have also won design awards, film awards and our Department of Performing and Screen Arts was voted one of the top 10 in the world. Our students We had 21,221 students (10,770 EFTs) enrolled in 152 programmes of study in 2012 with around 66% of all equivalent full-time students being enrolled in programmes at level 5 and above. The number of Māori students increased by 4% in 2012, while Pacific students made up 17% of the total government-funded students. International equivalent full-time students made up around 16% of our student body. A priority for us is ensuring students get the right support and information when they need it and in a way they can use it. At the end of 2012 we signed a new contract with USU that changed it from being Unitec’s Student Association to being a service provider for us. The changes mean that we will be able to increase our direct communication with students, have improved coordination of activities and have greater control over the look and feel of communications that go out to students. We also ran two student surveys over 2012 measuring student satisfaction and student engagement with Unitec. The AUSSE survey – a student survey undertaken by tertiary institutes across New Zealand and Australia – showed that Unitec had improved on our 2010 scores on all scales of student engagement – learning, environment, interaction with staff, experience and academic challenge.

Our graduates Our graduates go on to work in a range of fields contributing to business and the community throughout New Zealand and the world. Employment outcomes for graduates are an important indicator of the relevance of our qualifications and quality of our teachers. Through our annual graduate survey, our focus is on creating a profile of recent graduates to look at their employment situation in the months after graduation. In 2012, the response rate increased by 16 percentage points and this has helped improve the reliability of the information we use. Eighty-two percent of our graduates were studying, working or combining both, with 74% in employment relevant to their area of study. Fifty-three percent of graduates also indicated they were interested in returning to Unitec for further study. Our staff Unitec has a wide range of academic and professional staff who bring extensive knowledge, experience and expertise to the job. Many of our teaching staff are working professionals who are authorities in their fields, industry specialists with in-depth knowledge of their subjects and professional academics undertaking research in their areas of expertise. Eighty-three percent of our academic staff have a degree, with 60% having postgraduate qualifications and 15% with doctorates. In 2012, funding was awarded to 22 staff members through the Professional Development Fund for allied and non-academic staff. Overall, staff training and development was higher than in 2011, although below budgeted expenditure. The 2012 staff survey indicated an improvement since 2010, with 82% of staff saying they were satisfied with their job. Scores generally improved across the board, with key strengths being overall engagement and job satisfaction, a strong sense of teamwork and a clearer understanding of how they contribute to the success of Unitec.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

13


Māori Success Strategy The Māori Success Strategy is driving remarkable change.

The Māori Success Strategy, which aims to improve the educational outcomes of Māori students and their whānau, is now firmly embedded across Unitec and is driving change. Champions for success During 2012, a number of new positions were created with the appointment of a new Dean of Mātauranga Māori and three Kaihautū Mātauranga Māori, one within each of the faculties. As champions of the Māori Success Strategy, they play a vital role in driving the strategy’s implementation and in working with our staff to enhance Māori student engagement, success and retention – ensuring that we provide a supportive environment and positive experiences for Māori students. They also provide a mentoring role, offering advice 14

and support for staff and students around Mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) and helping to build the capability of staff to engage with te ao Māori. Through their networks we will open up new pathways and new opportunities for active engagement with Māori communities. Māori in trade and industry In August, Unitec and Māori in Tertiary Education (MITE) hosted two special events, the Māori Affairs Trade Training Dinner and the Māori Trade Event for secondary students. MITE is a joint venture between Unitec, Manukau Institute of Technology, Te Wānanga o Aotearoa and the University of Auckland to support Māori student training and employment in trade and industry. Both events align closely with our vision of “going the extra mile to help prepare work-ready students”.


90

%

of MĀori students who took part in the Whai Ake mentoring programme completed their first year of study

This page: Te Noho Kotahitangi – Unitec’s cultural heart. Opposite page: A welcome onto Unitec's marae; Hare Paniora, Unitec's Pae Arahi.

Robert Borrell Recipient of a oneyear Māori Carpentry Scholarship for Ngāti Whātua o ōrākei descendants

"My family is all involved, we’re from Ngāti Whātua. I was planning to do carpentry anyway – even without the scholarship – but in the end it was a better option. And the course was good.

The dinner – hosted by Unitec Chief Executive Dr Rick Ede and opened by the Minister of Māori Affairs, Hon Dr Pita Sharples – honoured graduates from the original Māori Affairs Trade Training Scheme, which ran from 1959 until the mid-1980s. The event also brought together a number of trade and industry organisations helping to foster valuable internship and employment opportunities for current tertiary graduates, amongst a network of supportive industry employers. At the Trade Event, Māori secondary students were given a 'taste' of careers in trade and industry, with interactive demonstrations and workshops from multiple tertiary providers. A ‘speed dating’ section at the event also gave qualified trade and industry graduates the opportunity to meet prospective employers.

Whai Ake mentoring programme The Whai Ake mentoring programme, set up to support Māori students in their first year of study, saw over 90% of participating students – or ‘mentees’ – completing their first year of study in 2012. Following the tuakana/tēina (older/younger sibling) mentoring model, mentees are paired with a senior Unitec student, who has been through the Whai Ake programme, and are provided with pastoral, cultural, financial and academic support in a kaupapa Māori environment. Students of the programme say they appreciate the opportunity to connect and share as a whānau and to receive support and encouragement from other Māori students who are doing well. It’s a way of celebrating Māori success.

"I had a job lined up and went straight from Unitec into work. My family helped me find the job, but it was set up through MITE. Riana there helped my family out a lot. She’d pick us up. Get us from A to B.

“I didn’t know what to expect when I started, now I can’t wait to get qualified.” "I’m doing commercial residential with Livefirm Construction, a sub-contractor to companies like Hawkins. At the moment I’m at a power station on the Shore and I’ve been to Sky City and Waiheke Island. “I didn’t know what to expect when I started, now I can’t wait to get qualified.”

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

15


Meet Cameron

16


“I worked on the construction of Auckland Art Gallery’s 22 ceiling panels. Each panel was constructed on a custom-made table, and some had to be built in separate pieces so they could be transported. There were 224 pieces altogether. It took 22 floor staff at the biggest part of the contract to install the panels and I was there to supervise and deal with technical issues. Every piece of New Zealand kauri used was hand picked for colour and grain, and I checked it for colour blending and finish.

Scan the code to see what our trades graduates have been working on.

Together with my team we made the Art Gallery that the world sees today. I’m proud of the responsibility I was given and I’m sure I did Papakura Joinery proud.” Cameron Wintle Joiner, Papakura Joinery

17


Pacific Success Strategy The Pacific Success Strategy has been placed in the spotlight this year, with numerous successes recorded for the team at the Pacific Centre for Teaching & Learning. At the very start of the year, a Pacific Orientation was held for all first-year students to introduce them to the Unitec environment and provide networking opportunities with their fellow students and staff. As an extension of this, for the first time all three faculties supported a Fanau Evening for first-year Pacific students and their families. The Pasifika Strategy 2010 – 2015 was evaluated across the three faculties, as well as the directorates and services, and the Pacific Centre held a Unitec-wide Pacific staff planning day. Collaboration with external stakeholders was also high on the agenda. The Police

68

%

of SAC-Funded Pacific students successfully completed their course

Recruitment Programme now has over 140 police officers in the New Zealand Police who are alumni of Unitec, and, in 2012, 30 students were enrolled into programmes within the Faculty of Technology and Built Environment, as part of the Pasifika TEC Scholarships programme. A ‘Return to Nursing’ programme was also developed in collaboration with the Department of Nursing and Languages, in partnership with the Ministry of Health, to support Pacific-trained nurses to gain nursing registration in 2012.

The Pacific Centre continued to work with various organisations in the community, such as Raise Pasifika, Ako Aotearoa, West Pacific Fono, Pacific in the Park – West Auckland as well as government agencies such as the Ministry of Education, TEC and the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA), to ensure the work we are doing is valuable and relevant. Research into the entrepreneurial activities of people in Vanuatu was presented to the Consulate General of the Republic of Vanuatu by the Pacific Centre and the Department of Management and Marketing. It was part of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) project, designed to evaluate entrepreneurial activity worldwide.

Expedition In June, Unitec held an Expedition at the Auckland Museum to present the updated strategic framework to all staff. Designed to bring staff together to establish a collective understanding of where Unitec is heading and how staff can work collaboratively and individually to help achieve this vision, Expedition was an interactive and informative day off campus.

18

With a tailored event for leaders within Unitec and a separate event for wider staff, Expedition provided Unitec staff with the opportunity to discuss elements of the strategic framework in depth and how it can be applied within different areas of the institution. Throughout the course of the event all staff participated in a clue hunt around the museum galleries, two interactive workshops,

and a question and answer session, and heard directly from the Leadership Team sponsors of the four strategic initiatives. Expedition was not a stand-alone event but the start of a dialogue about Unitec’s future; how far, how fast. Projects supporting the refreshed strategic framework presented at this event continue to be planned and delivered across the institution.


This page: Unitec's award-winning career-finding app, YouFinder, at the Coke Expo; Potential students using the YouFinder app. Opposite page: Unitec Pacific graduate; Equity and Diversity Manager Matthew Farry.

Building an inclusive environment

Ending the year on a high note, in December we received a certificate of acknowledgement from the Office of Ethnic Affairs for our success in equipping staff to communicate across social and cultural boundaries. At the ceremony, which took place at Te Noho Kotahitanga Marae, 16 front-line staff received certificates for completing the Intercultural Awareness and Communication (IAC) Programme.

Successful course completion rate for SAC-funded Māori students

Successful course completion rate for SAC-funded Pacific students

2009 74% 2010 73% 2011 76% 2012 78%

Successful course completion rate for all SACfunded students

2009 82% 2010 74% 2011 73% 2012 79%

Successful course completion rate for all students

Note: 2012 figures are preliminary estimates (based on data as at 31-01-2013) and are subject to change.

2009 73% 2010 74% 2011 76% 2012 76%

Successful course completion rates

2009 61% 2010 63% 2011 66% 2012 68%

Over 2012, we have made a number of changes to improve the experience students have at Unitec. The Student Satisfaction survey highlighted areas for us to focus on. We have made improvements to our online enrolment systems, making enrolment processes more accessible. We have streamlined communication processes to make sure students get the information they need when they need it about the services that support them to successfully complete their studies. We have started to look at how we can engage better with our alumni, and have enhanced our social media profile.

We continued to support diversity and inclusion on campus by implementing the Ally Network Programme. Ally is an initiative that aims to create a more inclusive culture by promoting greater visibility and awareness of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) staff and students and their related issues. Unitec is the first New Zealand tertiary institution to use this programme. The Ally Network is made up of staff and students who want to support the building of an inclusive working and learning

2009 68% 2010 71% 2011 73% 2012 74%

Students

environment for all. Unitec joined the Trans Tasman Ally Network in June, in association with the University of Western Australia (UWA), and supported by Queer@Unitec.

2009 77% 2010 77% 2011 79% 2012 79%

The programme is an initiative of our equity, diversity and inclusion strategy, Towards Inclusive Excellence, and was designed to promote an inclusive learning, working and campus environment for staff and students. By helping staff to build the capability to communicate effectively with people who are socially and culturally different from themselves, the programme aims to improve cultural understanding across Unitec. In

August, the EEO Trust’s Life and Work Awards acknowledged the programme as one of the top four nominees in the Ethnic Diversity award category.

2009 77% 2010 77% 2011 78% 2012 79%

In May, our Intercultural Learning and Dialogue Programme was announced as a finalist in the Institute of Public Administration New Zealand (IPANZ) Gen-i Public Sector Excellence Awards – Excellence in Ethnic Diversity category.

Successful course completion rate for SAC-funded students who are under 25

Successful course completion rate for international full fee paying students

Successful course completion rate for students with disability reported

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

19


Our place is a vibrant, innovative learning environment.

2964 number of international students at Unitec

Scan the code to take a journey across our three campuses 20


Place As well as our three campuses in Mt Albert, Henderson and Albany, our students and staff take part in a number of initiatives and projects throughout Auckland. In 2011, we developed our sustainability strategy and we have spent 2012 embedding this into our environment, learning and curriculum. Over the year, staff rubbish bins were replaced with desk-top mini bins, we introduced composting, included green building features within the wharekai and established a sustainable arboretum. The planting of native trees as part of the Wairaka Stream Restoration Project, as well as a range of waste-reducing initiatives we have put in place, mean that more staff and students see Unitec as environmentally responsible. In 2012, we started the ‘We Make the People who Make It’ campaign, focusing on Auckland City and celebrating the men and women who’ve built our amazing city – the carpenters, joiners, plumbers, civil engineers, builders, site managers and surveyors whose skills have put Auckland on the map. As part of this campaign, we created the ‘Made it Map’ encouraging people to put their name to the buildings they’ve helped create. Almost 300 people so far have tagged themselves on the map. In September, Unitec’s landscape architecture students took part in PARK(ing) Day. PARK(ing) Day is an annual international event in which participants use metered parking spaces in an effort to create a temporary 'park' installation or public space. Our students took over two parking spaces on Shortland Street in Auckland’s central business district, where they created a 3-D image of Auckland City to encourage members of the public to nominate what they wanted their city to look like by the year 2050. The map was then presented to the Auckland Council.

In September, we completed the comprehensive, library-specific Insync client survey. Again, more than 2000 students and staff participated. Insync allows us to benchmark our performance and impact against the libraries of 40 other, mainly Australasian, tertiary institutions. All but one of the 40 institutions are universities – Unitec is the only institute of technology participating. The survey rates respondents’ perceptions about the importance of a number of factors including communication, service delivery, facilities and equipment, library staff and information resources. Over 80% of respondents think library services – staff, resources and spaces – ‘support their study and research’ and ‘enhance their overall Unitec experience’. The student and staff surveys completed through the year showed improved scores across the board, with staff feeling more engaged and 75% of students saying they would definitely recommend Unitec to others. Nine out of 10 graduate survey respondents would also recommend Unitec to others. Our Northern campus in Albany has continued to flourish, with almost 1200 students (481 EFTS) undertaking courses in 2012. This is a greater than predicted expansion rate, and work is being undertaken on that campus to further improve student facilities and the environment. Our Waitakere campus in the heart of Henderson has over 3000 students attending courses, and with the opening of the Āwhina campus at Waitakere Hospital, our connection with, and commitment to, the community remains strong.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

21


Mt Albert campus The opening of the new facility enhances Unitec’s capacity and capability as host to manaaki manuhiri.

The Mt Albert campus has seen a number of exciting developments this year. Unitec’s stunning marae complex, Te Noho Kotahitanga, was completed with the opening of our new wharekai (dining room), Manaaki, in November. Manaaki links the ornately carved wharenui (meeting house) Ngākau Māhaki with our teaching and learning space, Puukenga, and enhances not only the physical marae and wider Unitec environment but more importantly our role as hosts in caring for our manuhiri (visitors). Aptly named, Manaaki meaning 'to care for, share and provide hospitality,' the opening of the new 200-seat facility enhances Unitec’s capacity and capability as host to manaaki manuhiri (care for our visitors).

22

In June, to celebrate World Environment Day, we held a planting day to kick start the Wairaka Stream Restoration Project. Students from Unitec’s Engineering Department worked with David Phillips, Head of the Civil Engineering Department, and Caleb Clarke from Morphum Environmental to examine ways to improve the hydrology of Wairaka Stream. As a result of this, a fourstage restoration plan was developed. The Planting on World Environment Day marked the start of Stage One. Unitec staff and students joined the Friends of Oakley Creek and local residents to plant over 10,000 plants and enjoy a free barbecue afterwards. Mel Galbraith from the Department of Natural Sciences is gathering key information about the Wairaka Stream to provide a baseline for measuring campus


10,000 number of plants and shrubs planted at unitec in 2012.

This page: Manaaki, Unitec’s new wharekai. Opposite page: Lynda Toki, Unitec’s Kai Awhina.

Alistair Kay Architect of the wharekai

“I see building as a very precious opportunity. More and more we are looking at the world and saying resources are not there to be wasted. Land, particularly land connected with something special, is even more precious. So this was a unique opportunity for me to build next to the wharenui. biodiversity. Lecturer Penny Cliffin and her students have been developing Unitec’s tree collection into a nationally recognised sustainable arboretum and are now starting to look at pathways and connections through campus and alongside the stream. After consultation with staff, students and other organisations located on our campuses, we have signed up to go smokefree in 2013. Our Smokefree/Auahi Kore Policy will come into effect on World Smokefree Day, Thursday 31 May in 2013, and includes all three of our campuses – Mt Albert, Waitakere and Northern. This initiative will help us ensure we are providing a healthy working and learning environment for our students, staff and communities. A number of support measures will be put in place, to help ease our staff and students’ transition. Unitec’s Health, Safety and Environment team will also train

additional staff and students to support its ‘quit smoking’ and nicotine replacement education programme, which will be rolled out from early 2013.The policy will apply to all staff, students and visitors to each of its three campuses, and cover all carparks and vehicles on Unitec grounds.

"The community around the marae made me very welcome. I was able to engage with Lyonel Grant [the master carver] and he took me through the concept he had of a manaia creature reclining on the site - with the wharenui as the head and the wharekai as the body that connects to it.

The IBM New Zealand Delivery Centre will be based on the top floor of building 172, currently housing the Departments of Communication Studies, Management and Marketing, and Accounting and Finance. Refurbishment began at the end of August and is due for completion early 2013. Staff and students' classes were rehoused in order for building work to start. Additional car parking is being developed adjacent to Building 172.

"We spent a lot of time refining what we would build before we drew it up and that was why the building succeeded, because of an engagement over time and the thoughtful process that we went through before committing to the build. "It’s not just about the materials and keeping within a budget but what everybody in the community brings to it. Everybody has to take the building on and say ‘this is ours’. For me the fulfilment is that people take the building and make it their own.” UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

23


A vision beyond its time

24


Unitec’s Te Noho Kotahitanga Marae is unique in New Zealand. It is the first marae for almost a century that has been built incorporating more traditional architectural approaches. Te Noho Kotahitanga is a hub for teaching and learning about te ao MÄ ori, a place for ceremonial and celebratory gatherings and a repository of local and historical knowledge.

25


The Northern campus is embracing innovation in teaching and support. Northern campus The newest campus in the Unitec stable turned one in 2012, with celebrations held in August. The Northern campus, based in Albany, serves the educational needs of students and the community of the North Shore and Rodney regions. With the population of Auckland north of the harbour bridge expected to grow from 329,000 in 2012 to 431,000 in 20 years’ time, the Northern campus is well placed to meet the needs of this community. Covering programmes including business, communication, information technology, health care, trades and languages, the Northern campus offers industry-relevant qualifications to equip students for future employment as well as offering preapprenticeship training. The campus has outgrown predictions, with 618 students enrolled in 2011 and almost 1200 students (481 EFTS) enrolled in 2012. Of these, 93 people identified as Māori and 67 as Pacific. The Northern campus is embracing innovation in teaching and support. Careers NZ is piloting an office at the campus, to be onsite to help students find the right roles, and to support them in their search for employment. As their only North Shore-based office they provide independent advice to students and the community.

26

Another innovation in teaching and learning is the smart sheds the building technology team use to teach students the ins and out of the building trade. Available at both Northern and Mt Albert capmus', the Northern site is based inside a massive warehousestyle environment. Students can build in all weather and use their smart phones and other technology to enhance their learning.

1195

students enrolled at Northern campus in 2012

Plans are under way to expand the breadth of industry areas covered at the campus as well as the level of programmes on offer, including applied degrees. With the redesign of Student Central (Te Pae Kōrero) and improved meeting spaces, the Northern campus is preparing for another busy year in 2013.

Waitakere campus The west is a unique area of Auckland, and in 2012 Unitec celebrated 10 years of having a campus serving the community in that region. Siobhan Marshall, who played Pascalle West in Outrageous Fortune and is a Unitec performing arts graduate, was a special guest at the themed event, aimed at thanking the key stakeholders who have supported the Waitakere campus as it has grown and flourished.

The Waitakere campus has become known for having a great choice of programmes, from certificates to master's programmes, that are well matched to the local community’s needs. Staff members who work from the Waitakere campus are proud to be part of the local community and are passionate about inspiring students to achieve. In 2012, the Āwhina campus was officially opened. The Āwhina campus is a joint venture between Unitec and the Waitemata District Health Board that opens the doors for practical collaboration, including research, innovation and learning in a productive and specialist environment. Based in the refurbished Snelgar and Health West buildings at Waitakere Hospital, the Āwhina campus is a physical and virtual hub that works alongside community organisations to encourage and promote collaboration and develop the future health workforce in west Auckland. Since Unitec opened its doors in Henderson 10 years ago, over 3000 students have graduated from social and health-related programmes. Many of these students have had the benefit of having practical training at the Waitakere Simulation Centre and in Waitakere Hospital. In 2012, there were over 3000 students (1420 EFTS) undertaking courses, with 474 of these identifying as Māori and 637 identifying as Pacific.


3113 students enrolled at waitakere campus in 2012

Top left to right: Students on Mt Albert campus; Lecturer Kamuka Pati using the smart shed; Students on the Northern campus. Below left to right: Celebrating 10 years at the Waitakere campus; Unitec graduate Siobhan Marshall.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

27


Our potential lies in our students, our staff, our graduates, our community and our industry partners.

90

%

of programmes now have embedded work-based learning

28


Potential Unitec’s potential lies in its students, staff, graduates, community and industry partners. Our four key strategic initiatives: Highly Productive Talent, Reframing our Workforce, Reconceptualising our Services and Unshackling the Property Anchor helped guide our progress through 2012 and will help drive continued transformation. Over 2012, we have seen significant developments. In 2009, Unitec committed to a new approach to learning and teaching – the Living Curriculum. This approach is in line with best practice internationally. The Living Curriculum is about students being more actively involved in their learning. Over 90% of programmes now have embedded work-based learning practices. Fifty-five percent of programmes have been redeveloped with the Living Curriculum. The Department of Foundation Education revised the programme design of the Certificate in Foundation Studies (Level 2) and the Certificate in Foundation Studies (Level 3) for delivery in 2013. The new framework, Bridgepoint, links education with employment routes or vocational pathways. The vocational pathways are guided by industries across the sector and increase the relevance of learning. They ensure we get valid learning outcomes that are supported by real-world project-based activities. As well as the redeveloped Bridgepoint programme, we will be delivering the 60-credit Certificate of University Preparation (Level 4) and the 120-credit Certificate in Foundation Studies (Level 4) in partnership with Massey University Foundation Education, from 2013. Unitec’s eLearning strategy continued apace in 2012. Although the whole-of-institution-funded initiative was completed at the end of 2011, much activity and progress continued throughout 2012. The faculties retained eLearning Development Advisors, and several departments retained funded release time for eLearning Community Coordinators, meaning the level of support for embedding and capability development was retained at a high level. During 2012, a major upgrade to Moodle 2.4 was undertaken. An iPad community

of practice, with more than 100 members, was established and remains very active, and several wireless mobile device pilots were either progressed or initiated. All this was made easier by continuous improvement to the infrastructure including expansion of the wireless network. Unitec continues to prioritise the development of capability and innovation in eLearning to stay ahead of international trends in web-based pedagogy. In 2012, we also embedded our Environmental Sustainability Strategy. We were the first New Zealand signatory of the United Nations Commitment to Sustainable Practices of Higher Education Institutions and won the 2012 Sustainable Business Network Trailblazer Not for Profit Award. With the range of waste-reducing initiatives we have put in place, the student and staff footprint is becoming smaller and shows that everyone is taking on board the sustainability message. Sustainability is now part of the curriculum in 19 programmes, and with more planning to incorporate it in 2013 and with a fully developed online Environmental Management System, we are in a position to seek ISO14001 certification in 2013. This will bring the organisation into line with best international business practices. As an institute of technology, our research is applied and practical. It has an impact on the world around us and can be used by the people in the industries we support. We give priority to research that makes a difference to our stakeholders, to our students and to the community. Students and staff have undertaken a range of research projects that have benefited the environment, the community, our business partners and local government. In 2012, our research magazine, Advance, was redesigned and the Advance research blog created. We are continuing to develop our research capability and industry recognition for applied research.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

29


Cyber Security Research Centre Another major event for Unitec has been signing a joint venture with National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Japan’s national research institution. The new Cyber Security Research Centre is staffed by Unitec researchers, with the physical space at Unitec’s Mt Albert campus, while the equipment and funding is provided by NICT. The Centre has been set up in response to the rapidly changing online environment, including a rise in cyber crime, and has provided a unique opportunity for Unitec’s Department of Computing to become world leaders in cyber security. The Cyber Security Research Centre aims to produce new results in this cutting-edge area of research and produce highly employable graduates who are in demand around New Zealand. This new agreement includes a three-year research project headed by Associate Professor Paul Pang, and will involve both staff and students, who will have the opportunity to be part of high-quality research outputs and come away with the knowledge and experience vital to providing a safe cyberspace environment in New Zealand and around the world. Cyber security is vital to protecting New Zealand’s infrastructure assets and this is one of the main reasons for this kind of

30

research, which could prevent serious future issues. The aim of the Centre is to keep New Zealanders safer. Aside from the obvious opportunities provided by the new Research Centre at Unitec, other by-products have already emerged from the collaboration. A doctoral student is currently at NICT for one year, paid for by NICT. On his return, he will have a wealth of knowledge to put back into the Centre and will continue his research with help from NICT and Unitec supervisors. Through the association with NICT, the Department of Computing is also working with another tertiary institution in Japan, the Nara Institute of Science and Technology

(NAIST). The arrangement includes a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to do research, staff exchanges and student exchanges, and has come about as a direct result of the move into the cyber security arena. Students from Unitec have already travelled to NAIST (funded by NAIST) to get information and use their facilities for projects related to work we’re doing here at Unitec. The new Research Centre offers students and staff with opportunities to become experts in an important field worldwide, and offers an essential combination of teaching and research that will produce work-ready graduates in an area of need in New Zealand.


Opposite page: Dr Kazumasa Enami and Executive Dean, Faculty of Creative Industries and Business, Leon Fourie officially open the Cyber Security Research Centre; Chief Executive, Rick Ede signs the MOU.

We’re excited by the first-rate capabilities of the researchers in Unitec's Department of Computing.

“NICT has many relationships with research institutions around the world, and we expect these partners to maintain our high standards in everything they do, not only in terms of their research outputs, but also in terms of the institution-wide policies and procedures.

Dr Kazumasa Enami

Vice President of the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology

"I am happy to say that Unitec easily meets our requirements for an outstanding research partner. I met personally with Unitec Chief Executive Rick Ede and the leadership team, and was impressed with their vision for the institution. The professionalism and organisation I saw at Unitec has given me confidence that this will be a long-standing and sustained relationship. “Our aim is to become the leader for cyber security research in New Zealand and eventually in the wider Asia-Pacific region; the new Cyber Security Research Centre is another step towards that.

Dr Hossein Sarrafzadeh Head of Department, Computing

"Many commentators are saying that if you want job security, look to cyber security as a profession. I think we’ve combined teaching and research in an environment where graduates will come out ready for work in niche areas, and areas of need in the industry. We want our students in New Zealand to be able to develop products for the international markets. It’s our aim to create a cyber security capability in New Zealand that directly translates to export dollars for our economy.

"Collaboration is the most important thing for us, and it’s why we are here. We’re excited by the first-rate capabilities of the researchers in the Unitec Computing Department and believe the relationship will only strengthen us in the fight against cyber attacks, and ensure both institutions become world leaders in this area of research. "We are hoping to extend the collaboration to other areas of mutual interest in the near future and are looking forward to working with Unitec on a wider scale.”

We’ve also been able to send students on exchange to NICT and NAIST, and this will continue in the future. This by-product of the arrangement with NICT is just as important as the general aims we have for the centre, because the most important thing for us is the students. This is out of a clear strategy that Unitec is following, centred on producing highly productive talent, innovation in teaching and learning, and an excellent student experience. If we train them well, then we’ve achieved our goal. To train them well we need a real-life environment for them to learn in; the new Cyber Security Research Centre is the best way to achieve that.”

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

31


Big steps forward in sustainability Award winning High-quality environmental sustainability practices became a reality in 2012 as Unitec won the Sustainable Business Network Trailblazer Not for Profit Award. The award is given to organisations that show leadership in sustainability, and, according to the judges, Unitec showed not only the desire to improve its performance but also “deepened its stakeholders’ understanding of sustainability − extending to investing in regenerative practices and aspiring to create shared value. Unitec has a commendable vision for their core delivery areas which together with a strong collaborative approach is delivering very impressive results. They have robust governance, strategic planning and reporting regimes, plus admirable sector leadership.” Internationally significant Unitec also became the first New Zealand signatory of the United Nations Commitment to Sustainable Practices of Higher Education Institutions. By signing the commitment and responding to the urgency of global sustainability issues, Unitec cemented its existing pledge to sustainability at an international level and took a major step towards becoming a leader in sustainability in the Australasian tertiary sector.

32

Teaching what we’re preaching Sustainability has been acknowledged as an essential part of our curriculum, and a new requirement has been added to the Living Curriculum that our programmes include sustainability content. A goal of 15% of programmes meeting this requirement in 2012 was easily met, with 19 programmes now officially recognised as having sustainability content.

68

%

The percentage of staff who consider Unitec environmentally responsible

Culture of sustainability To help create a culture of sustainability Unitec held multiple events for students and staff in 2012, showcasing sustainability across the three campuses. Staff and students both became more aware of Unitec’s commitment, with surveys showing that 68% of staff and 67% of students see Unitec as environmentally responsible. At the end-of-year staff awards, the sustainability team won the Chief Executive’s Award in recognition of their hard work.

Better practice on campus Greening our campuses is seen as a priority and a range of new initiatives were put in place in 2012. These included food scraps composting, staff mini-bins, double-sided printing, replacing leaking water mains, establishing a sustainable arboretum, a bike rack design competition, worm farms for both on-site childcare centres, green building features within the new wharekai and a new carpooling service. Environmental Management System Unitec now has a fully developed online Environmental Management System. This positions Unitec to seek ISO14001 certification in 2013, bringing the organisation into line with best international business practices and positioning it to work towards full sustainability reporting in the future. Accessible to all Unitec staff, students and key stakeholders, the Eco-Portal online platform ensures that Unitec remains fully accountable for its commitments and encourages staff and student engagement.


From left to right: Planting day at the Wairaka Stream; The award-winning sustainability team.

18.5 18% 3 tonnes

Travers Reynolds

%

Unitec’s water consumption went down by

in 2012 ,there was A reduction in unitec’s paper consumption of at unitec in 2012 there was a decrease IN waste of

Architecture student

“As an eco-rep and student representative on the Environmental Sustainability Strategy Committee I had the chance to experience what was going on at Unitec – both in policy making and advocacy at board meetings, as well as in practical measures and what was taught in the classroom.

Student footprint

"During the year I had many chances to get involved in tree plantings, lectures and conferences on sustainability, advocating for recycling. I enjoyed watching an institution becoming a more sustainable school!

Waste kgs/EFTS 2012

35.72

2011

36.53

2010

Water

39.33

"An exciting aspect is the amount of teaching we had on sustainability. As an architecture student it's a big part of our curriculum, but many teachers would willingly promote ‘sustainability’ in-depth.

m3/EFTS

2012

7.75

2011 2010

9.48 10.16

Energy KWh/EFTS 2012

1,261

2011 2010

1,250

1,265

"I also found that through my involvement with the advocacy team I had a stronger connection to the place I was studying. Thanks to the feedback and statistics, as well as the vast amounts of resource and enthusiasm provided by Carolyn Cox in her role, the giant task of making Unitec more environmentally sustainable was made plausible, achievable, and fun.” UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

33


Our campuses provide a learning environment where students can achieve their potential. Our research is applied and practical. It has impact on the world around us and can be used by the industries we support. We look for creative new ways of doing things so that whatever our students study, they leave Unitec with the skills they need.

34

Creating possibilities


35


This page: Nigel Adams, winner of the Research with Impact prize, with Dean of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Simon Peel; Two minutes 30 seconds into Saul Taylor’s talk. Opposite page left to right: Scholarship-winning student Monari Falepeau; Unitec graduate/lecturer Alan Parr in action.

Research Symposium Research is a vital component of the academic life at Unitec, and the annual Research Symposium provides an opportunity for staff and students to network and learn about the research happening at Unitec, as well as compete for the Research with Impact prize (staff) and the Three Minute Thesis Competition (students). The range of projects is vast, with topics from a variety of disciplines across the campuses. This year’s symposium included an army of topics, from judging bias in laying hens and the impact of mega events on construction planning, to Arabic-speaking students’ language needs and measuring the cardiorespiratory system efficiency in trained rowers.

“It’s important that researchers from the different disciplines at Unitec are able to connect with each other, making useful relationships for possible future research, but also to see that they are not alone, that

their work is part of a greater whole, adding up to a wide variety of important and useful research taking place across out campuses,” says Simon Peel, Dean of Research and Postgraduate Studies.

aspirations and success of the local hapū. In 2012, Unitec offered four Māori Carpentry Scholarships for Ngāti Whātua o Orakei descendants and provided five places on Unitec’s STEP UP programme, which provides senior secondary students with revision and preparation for their external NCEA exams and some Cambridge International Examinations.

is relevant to the future development of the hapū, was awarded for the first time in 2012. The inaugural recipient, Ngaire Hotu, is studying for a Bachelor of Nursing – which is an area of high priority for the hapū, which owns and runs four health clinics.

Scholarships, awards and grants Unitec offers more than 100 scholarships, awards and grants to help students get the most out of their study. These awards cover all programmes of study from foundation education study awards to postgraduate scholarships, and from book vouchers to the payment of tuition fees. Ngāti Whātua o Orakei scholarships Unitec has worked closely with Ngāti Whātua o Orakei for a number of years to develop educational initiatives that support the 36

A new Tu Ake scholarship, to assist a student enrolled in a Unitec degree programme that


Unitec offers more than 100 scholarships, awards and grants to help students get the most out of their study.

Fast and furious filmmaking In one hectic weekend in May each year, over 800 teams of filmmakers from across New Zealand participate in the V48 Hours filmmaking competition. Entrants are given a prop and must create a short film in 48 hours. As a silver sponsor, we offer one entrant a Unitec Study Award scholarship to the oneyear Graduate Diploma in Creative Practice majoring in either directing, screenwriting or art direction. Entrants are also eligible to attend three free filmmaking workshops hosted at Unitec. In 2012, the calibre of those involved was high, with the finalists being judged by international experts including Hollywood actor Elijah Wood. Director Sir Peter Jackson also picked a wild-card entry for inclusion in the grand final.

Working alongside industry organisations such as the New Zealand Film Commission, Wingnut Films, Rialto Cinemas and postproduction companies, Unitec is able to support filmmaking at a grass roots level.

800

number of teams of filmmakers competing in V48 hours

Unitec students have featured strongly in the finals, being part of the winning teams in 2010 and 2011 and National Grand Finalists in 2012. The 2010 winner, Yamin Tun, had the film she made during her year of study accepted to be shown at the 2012 Auckland International Film Festival, while 2011 winner Alan Parr, who teaches part-time at Unitec, has been selected twice by Peter Jackson as the wild-card entry.

For the past two years students and staff from the Shanghai Theatre Academy in China have taken part. Hosted by Unitec’s Performing and Screen Arts Department, the 2012 Shanghai students were placed in two teams and finished second and third respectively in the Audience Vote in heat one of the Auckland City finals. UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

37


400 Number of jobs that could be created over the next TWO years through the IBM NEW Zealand Delivery Centre

Through partnerships we find out what our community and industry need.

Scan the code to watch the IBM video 38


Partnership Partnerships with other organisations help us to achieve our strategic goals. Through partnerships we find out what our community and industry need, help build capability, create opportunities for our students, access new and innovative ways of teaching and ensure we operate in an efficient, effective and sustainable way. Over 2012, Unitec has continued to develop a wide range of industry partnerships. From our local business community to national and global organisations and overseas tertiary partners, 2012 has seen some exciting developments. The most significant partnership that has come to fruition over 2012 is the signing of a joint venture with leading business and technology solutions provider IBM. This initiative will see the opening of IBM’s only New Zealand-based Delivery Centre at our Mt Albert campus in February 2013, providing students with part-time work, access to scholarships, internships, graduate hire programmes and Earn As You Learn degrees. This collaboration provides a template for new and innovative ways tertiary organisations can work with industry. In 2010-11 we focused on effective stakeholder and community engagement initiatives across all faculties and departments. Departments have reported on how they have identified their industry and community stakeholders and what engagement strategies they have put in place. In 2012, we developed a suite of tools to support this work and built internal capability with the appointment of a Manager Partnerships and Community Engagement. We are continuing to implement the Unitec Engagement Strategy including creating a Health and Social Care Workforce Forum for west Auckland, partnering with Rotary International for Walk for Water and working alongside Manukau Institute of Technology and Te Wānanga o Aotearoa to identify emerging gaps in vocational tertiary provision in Auckland.

We have worked in partnership with USU – Unitec’s Student Association throughout 2012. USU has provided social activities for our students, student-to-student communication, student media including the student magazine, Script, and been the gateway for us as an organisation to communicate with students. While we have sponsored the Westpac Auckland West Business Awards for a number of years, this year we also became a supporter of the Westpac Auckland North Business Awards. As part of our commitment to these business regions, Unitec staff provided coaching to entrants including how to put their application together. Ten out of the 19 winners were coached by Unitec. In the west, we sponsored the workplace development category. Award winners of each category receive a $2000 study grant to go towards staff education. For the first time, in 2012, we sponsored an award at the Indian Newslink Indian Business Awards for the Best Medium-Sized Business. Over the year, we had the official launch of a joint venture with the Rosebank Business Association, Tēpu, which will provide work-based learning opportunities for students, develop potential projects and undertake research. We signed an MOU with Industrial Research Ltd (IRL) that aims to deliver more and better work-ready, high-tech workers to New Zealand manufacturing and service industries. This collaboration will give IRL access to the skills and capability existing within Unitec, but also provide Unitec students with real-word experience on industry projects and deliver work-ready graduates to industry. We have signed three MOUs with Indian training organisations, expanding our business in this region, and joined with Japan’s NICT to establish New Zealand’s first Cyber Security Research Centre.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

39


IBM partnership

This page: Chief Executive, Rick Ede, Prime Minister. John Key, IBM NZ Managing Director, Jennifer Moxon at the launch; Inside the new Delivery Centre; First batch of students recruited to work with Westpac. Opposite page: Prime Minister John Key officially opening the Delivery Centre.

In August, Unitec announced that IBM’s first New Zealand Delivery Centre would be based at its Mt Albert campus. The Delivery Centre will open in February 2013 and employ up to 400 full and part-time professionals, Unitec graduates and current students over the next two years. The Delivery Centre is based on IBM’s successful model at the Ballarat University Delivery Centre in Australia. The Delivery Centre has been formed through a new style of collaboration between industry and education in New Zealand, aligning talent, technology infrastructure and business opportunities. IBM has a long history of collaborating with the tertiary sector to develop graduates with the right skills to work in today’s services-oriented economy. This agreement with IBM will enable annual scholarship programmes, internships, graduate hire programmes and extended industry-based Earn As You Learn placements. It will also provide students studying at Unitec with relevant, paid work experience with IBM. Working with a highly respected global company such as IBM will give our students the head start they need to get a great job when they graduate. Bringing innovative businesses such as IBM into the education environment is about matching the skills of our students with the demands of business and providing students with the experience they need to make a difference in their communities and in New Zealand. 40

IBM will give our students the head start they need to get a great job when they graduate.

Unitec staff will benefit from new development opportunities through jointly developed guest lectures and mentoring with IBM staff, bringing real-time experience of current technology and business services industries to the classroom. The Delivery Centre will increase Auckland’s capacity to service local and international businesses with high-value skills by providing a range of advanced technology and business


process services. This means New Zealand organisations will now have another strategic option for outsourcing business processes to enable them to compete internationally. This initiative aligns very closely with Unitec’s aspirations, purpose and strategy, and redefines how a tertiary institution can work with industry to achieve both significant graduate employment outcomes and also make a significant contribution to economic growth and productivity. The model characterises Unitec’s work-integrated learning approach and will enhance its relevance to prospective students and their families. IBM has signed its first client. Westpac New Zealand will be the anchor client of the Delivery Centre. Unitec students will be providing Java programming, testing, integration and data management services for them.

Jennifer Moxon Managing Director, IBM New Zealand

"Generating economic growth is a collective responsibility. It requires bold thinking and new skills, unexpected partnerships and smart industry collaboration. In August 2012, IBM and Unitec Institute of Technology joined together to establish the first IBM New Zealand Delivery Centre based at Unitec’s Mt Albert campus. We see this as an example of the collaboration between business and educational institutions needed to develop graduates with the right skills to work in today’s digital services-oriented economy. "This New Zealand Delivery Centre is now one of more than 50 delivery centres that IBM runs across five continents, and represents a multimillion dollar investment in New Zealand. To be formally opened in February 2013 by the Prime Minister, the Delivery Centre will give students valuable IT industry experience as they study, and job opportunities when they graduate.

"Earn-As-You-Learn placements, guest lectures, mentoring and internship are all elements of a programme to match skills and learning with industry demand. In tandem, students and experienced IBM developers and managers will provide our clients with flexible, long-term access to specialised services in areas spanning human resources, supply chain management, finance and administration, customer relationship management, technology support and consulting. "It is this type of collaboration – a combination of established leading information technology practices and practical learning – that can deliver profound results in terms of skills development, business productivity and innovation. This partnership is also about job creation – and we fully expect to create 400 high-value jobs over the next two years, servicing IBM’s local and global client base. "IBM might be the world’s largest private research company, but no one has a monopoly on smart ideas and innovation. In partnering with Unitec, we are excited to get closer to the people shaping tomorrow’s world – thinkers and innovators who will provide the creativity so crucial to our business community and New Zealand’s future prosperity."

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

41


Unitec Computing Lecturer Mahsa Mohaghegh was the winner of the 2012 Google Anita Borg Scholarship for postgraduate students in New Zealand and Australia, the first time a New Zealand entrant has won the prestigious award. She firmly believes that getting more women into computing is about giving them an insight into what computer science and computer engineering are really about. When she arrived back in New Zealand after winning the scholarship and spending time at Google headquarters, Mahsa says she was motivated to do something more to encourage women in the field, and has since applied for funding from Google to run workshops for teachers in technology to be held at Unitec.

“There is a whole realm of creativity involved; computing is not just about sitting in front of a screen programming all day. For any women who have a passion for computer science, I really recommend they apply for the scholarship. It is a really prestigious award, and it is there for us.� Mahsa Mohaghegh Unitec Lecturer

42


Meet Mahsa

43


India business development Unitec recognised that there was an opportunity to work with organisations in India to build capability in delivering workintegrated vocational training.

Unitec has been looking at developing a number of joint ventures with educational providers in India. India’s accelerated economic growth and increasing demand for skilled manpower will require intensive efforts if they are to achieve the target of upskilling 500 million workers by 2022. Recent estimates have only 10% of the total workforce (459 million) in the country receiving some kind of skills training (2% with formal training and 8% with informal training). The unorganised sector is not supported by any structured skill development and training system to acquire or upgrade skills. Unitec recognised that there was an opportunity to work with organisations in India to build capability in delivering work-integrated vocational training. Chief Executive Dr Rick Ede made two trips to India in 2012, including one as part of a Ministerial delegation. As a result of these visits we formed a number of strategic alliances. In September we signed an MOU with Whispering Woods, Asia’s largest film school. Based in Film City, Mumbai, Whispering Woods was founded by one of India’s leading filmmakers and is Asia’s largest film, television, animation and media arts institute.

44

We also signed a two-year MOU with Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research (WeSchool) based in Mumbai.

10,000 number of employees CMC has

WeSchool is an autonomous institute that also offers distance learning programmes. With campuses in Bangalore and Mumbai, they take a ‘design thinking’ approach towards education, where the emphasis is on creativity and innovation. Students largely design their own curriculum and learning is real-world project based. They have around


500

m

number of workers India wants to upskill by 2022

From left to right: Unitec construction student; CEO of CMC Mr Ramanan and Chief Executive, Rick Ede after signing MOU witnessed by Minister Steven Joyce.

CMC Academy

Mr Ramanan, CEO and Managing Director

"CMC’s Education and Training business unit wants to bridge the skills gap between industry needs and training currently available in India. Our focus is to create specific job-enabling training programmes through CMC Academy and proactively assist students to find jobs when they finish. 2000 students with 100 permanent and 400 visiting staff, most of whom have an industry background. The MOU will look at collaborative initiatives such as reciprocal study tours, promoting student exchange programmes, opportunities for joint research studies, joint development of sustainable technologies, internships and work experience. These initiatives are about developing educational partnerships. In October, we formed an alliance with CMC Limited to offer vocational education and training from CMC Academy centres in India. CMC is a subsidiary of Tata Consultancy Services Limited, Asia’s largest software company. Operating out of 18 offices and 180 service locations in the country, CMC

employs over 10,000 people and is a wellregarded established education and training provider in India. CMC Academy currently offers Job Enablement Training in information technology, accounting and finance and several skill areas through 250-plus training locations across India. CMC Academy and Unitec will work together to provide training programmes to address the skills gap. The MOU, which was signed in Mumbai by Mr Ramanan Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of CMC and Dr Ede Chief Executive of Unitec, was witnessed by Hon Steven Joyce, Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills and Employment.

"Our alliance with Unitec will help us offer world-class vocational training courses that will accelerate vocational training and job placements in India. CMC Academy and Unitec will provide training programmes to address the skill gaps while students will get worldclass training that is adapted to the Indian market and industry needs. CMC and Unitec will launch vocational training for one ICT course and one non-ICT course in early 2013. This will then be expanded to other training centres. Partnerships will be set up with relevant industries to offer jobs to students who complete these courses. "This is a great opportunity for the partnership between CMC and Unitec to grow and we look forward to a successful pilot and the launch of co-branded vocational training courses across the whole CMC Academy network of training centres in India in 2013." UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

45


Run Walk/adidas Auckland Marathon The sponsorship of the Unitec Run Walk series and adidas Auckland Marathon has enabled Unitec to raise its profile by supporting a community activity that fosters healthy lifestyles and students contributing positively to society. By providing post-race sport recovery treatment, the Departments of Osteopathy and Sport demonstrated active marketing and student engagement. Additionally, it helps develop long-term relationships with participants and key stakeholders from the first event right through to the adidas Auckland Marathon. Significant growth and development has occurred over the two years of the partnership, increasing engagement with staff, students and community, and resulting in some key achievements in 2012. Event one of the Run Walk series was held on Unitec’s Mt Albert campus, with over 200 runners participating. Clinic 41 services were promoted by 40 osteopathy students treating approximately 350 participants at the adidas Auckland Marathon, creating 30 referrals that each had six sessions at the osteopathy clinic. The Human Performance Lab added 50 additional people to the database and provided 10 follow-up assessments.

46

Human interest stories raised awareness of the Run Walk events. Mike Mcleod (Unitec osteopathy student and Men’s Health Trust Scholar) developed a health initiative for inactive men, which included 10 inactive males who participated in training sessions and took part in some of the Run Walk events. His story attracted radio coverage. Ngaroimata Reid, who used the Human Performance Lab to help her train for the New York Marathon, was an ambassador for the Unitec Run Walk series and appeared in newspapers and on MÄ ori Television. Both the Sport and Osteopathy Departments had research articles published on the adidas Auckland Marathon website.

A social media campaign developed brand association and engagement with the adidas Auckland Marathon and promoted sport and osteopathy, with six posts over eight weeks before the marathon. An average of 2000 people were reached with each post, along with 200 views of the staff video and 2400 clicks on the marathon day photos. An internal staff pedometer challenge showcasing osteopathy and sports services/skills resulted in 80 staff participating and prompted Unitec to host a Running Masterclass Event for the community with ultra marathon runner Lisa Tamati and Ngaroimata Reid as the motivational speakers.


This page: Mystics in action; Blues fans taken by one of the ’FanCam’ photography students. Opposite page: Participants starting the Run Walk series.

Sponsorships – Blues, Auckland Rugby, Mystics, V48 Hours and Outlook for Someday Unitec was proud to be associated with a range of sponsorship properties including the Run Walk series, adidas Auckland Marathon, Blues (Super 15), Auckland Rugby (ITM Cup), Mystics (ANZ Netball Championship), V48 Film Festival and the Outlook for Someday sustainability film challenge. The association with the Blues, Auckland Rugby and Mystics not only develops brand awareness and visibility but also fosters education and research opportunities for students by creating valuable internships/ involvement with these professional sporting organisations. Five Unitec photography students from design and visual arts took part in the Unitec

‘FanCam’ initiative, capturing the excitement of the Blues’ home games to share with fans. The initiative helped the students practise their event photo-journalism skills and build a portfolio of work while they studied. The students’ photos were posted regularly on the Blues’ official Facebook page and shared online with the franchise’s loyal fan base. Fans actively tag themselves and their friends, liking, sharing or commenting on the students’ photos at a rapidly growing rate. Unitec and the Department of Performing and Screen Arts were proud to be the Tertiary Partner for the Outlook for Someday sustainability film challenge for young people in 2012.

There were 191 entries to the film challenge, involving 700 participants. Talented youngsters from the age of seven to 24 from all over New Zealand were able to use their creative ideas and technical knowledge to raise awareness about subjects ranging from climate change and recycling to the sustainability of language and culture. Unitec hosted workshops sharing values of sustainability and social responsibility as well as developing students' skills and experience during the filmmaking process. Unitec was well represented at the Outlook for Someday Awards, with alumni Liesha Ward Knox MCing the event and Kiel McNaughton giving the closing speech.

Partnerships – Massey High School Trades Academy The first year of the new West Auckland Vocational Academy (part of the Government’s Trades Academy programme) saw 88 students enrolled through Massey High School, with 14 of those students taking carpentry and 22 taking electrotechnology through Unitec. The collaboration between Unitec and the west Auckland high school allows students to learn more practical subjects with Unitec tutors while still studying for NCEA through Massey High School. According to Massey High School’s principal Bruce Ritchie, Academy students will likely be young people who are not enjoying, and

consequently not achieving in, traditional school courses. “They do, however, have the potential to engage, focus and work hard in a modified school environment,” he says. “The enthusiasm and excitement that this project has created among our students has been fabulous. We couldn’t have wished for a better start.” The carpentry students built a house at the Massey High School campus, in an experience similar to full-time carpentry students enrolled at Unitec, says Carol Ngawati, Director Māori Student and Community at Unitec. “It’s not a one-size-fits-all process.

It’s about trying to meet the needs of our community.” Offering the students an alternative to the standard school experience has kept them interested and engaged with learning. “For some of these kids, this is a second chance,” says Ngawati. “Their families love this programme because they know these kids are going somewhere, that they have a purpose.” Of those students who participated in the 2012 carpentry course through Massey High School, 12 applied to go to Unitec and two have apprenticeships. UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

47


Contents Statement of Service Performance

50

Financial Statements

76

Introduction

52

Statement of Responsibility

78

Statement of Service Performance Part A

53

Independent Auditor's report

79

Statement of Service Performance Part B

62

Statement of Comprehensive Income

81

Governance Report

66

Council functions and duties

68

Accountability and communication

68

Council structure and membership

68

Council and committee attendance

69

Appendices 132

Council and committee fees

69

Students 134

Council register of interests

69

Staff 136

Investing in our staff

72

Student services fee

73

Key staff statistics

74

Statement of Financial Position

82

Statement of Changes in Equity

83

Statement of Cash Flows

84

Notes to the Financial Statements

87


50


Statement of Service Performance for the year ended 31 December 2012


Introduction Tertiary Education Sector Performance Framework and Relationship to Unitec’s Statement of Service Performance Tertiary Education Strategy (Describes sector priorities)

Unitec Investment Plan

(Describes how Unitec will contribute to sector goals within allocated resources)

Unitec Institute of Technology Statement of Service Performance (Describes how we performed against our Investment Plan goals)

Inputs SECTOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION

Economy

What funding and resources do we have and use?

The purpose of this Statement of Service Performance is for users of the Unitec Institute of Technology Annual Report to understand how we perform against non-financial performance targets alongside performance as measured by the financial statements. Without both financial and nonfinancial performance being measured, users would struggle to get a good understanding of Unitec’s achievements and areas of improvement. Unitec measures its performance against a range of non-financial targets and measures. These are selected to reflect appropriate measures against the benefits (outputs and outcomes), resource allocations (inputs) and quality dimensions. Unitec is part of a larger tertiary education sector. As such, we work within the framework of the Tertiary Education Strategy 2010 – 2015, which sets outcome targets for the sector as a whole, including contribution to the economic and social wellbeing of New Zealand and the employment and education aspirations of New Zealanders. Unitec has a current Investment Plan that includes performance targets that have been agreed with the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) to reflect how Unitec can contribute toward the outcomes contained in the Tertiary Education Strategy. These include targets toward: »» people progressing to higher levels of education »» people progressing to employment »» values added to industry and society

52

Outputs What activities are we undertaking? Primarily Education Services

Impacts are we making?

Outcomes What does the sector achieve for New Zealanders?

»» more engaged communities and »» enhanced environmental sustainability. Performances against these targets are best measured by the mandatory Education Performance Indicators (EPIs). Unfortunately, EPIs are trailing measures, often available well after a year end, and therefore other measures have been included to provide some lead indication of this performance. They do have the advantage of comparability across the tertiary education sector. Non-financial performance targets for this report, as can be measured using Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP), are included in the Unitec Investment Plan 2011 – 2013. These reflect the outputs and education service delivery performance that are expected of Unitec, by both Unitec Council and the TEC. The measures selected attempt to provide a balanced understanding of performance around dimensions such as education service quality, quantity, timeliness, achievement, and the alignment to our communities and the aspirations and needs of those communities. Measures used in the Statement of Service Performance are often annual measures reflecting more regular measurement used by management on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.


Part A This part of the Statement of Service Performance includes all measures from the Unitec Investment Plan for 2011 to 2013.

A1: Meeting the needs of our communities A1.1: Impacts Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Actual

2012 Target

2011 Actual

People progress to employment

Graduate Survey: Response rate

Yes

51%

45%

35%

Value added to industry and society

External research and tech1 transfer income ($000)

No

$478

$1,651

$3462

Value added to industry and society

Target groups participation: student achievement component (SAC) funded equivalent full-time student (EFTS)

No

8,481

9,044

8,3053

Value added to industry and society

Target groups participation: Youth Guarantee EFTS

No

128

160

145

Value added to industry and society

Target groups participation: % of SAC EFTS who are Māori

Yes

11%

11%

11%

Value added to industry and society

Target groups participation: % of SAC EFTS who are Pacific peoples

Yes

17%

13%

15%

Value added to industry and society

Target groups participation: % of SAC EFTS who are under 25

NA

57%

NA4

57%3

Value added to industry and society

Proportion of academic portfolio >= level 4

Yes

86%

80%

84%3

More engaged communities

Carnegie Community Engagement Classification: Undertake improvement plan to enable participation in 2015 assessment

Yes

Completed

Undertake improvement plan

NA5

More engaged communities

Community relationships: Develop Auckland Vocational Sector Strategic Industry Engagement Forum with Manukau Institute of Technology (MIT) and Te Wānanga o Aotearoa (TWOA)

No

Not completed

Develop forum

NA5

More engaged communities

Community relationships: Implement Unitec engagement strategy

No

Not completed

Implement strategy

NA5

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Number of environmental sustainability events hosted

Yes

11

10

NA5

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Percentage of staff who consider Unitec environmentally responsible

Yes

68%

62%

58%

1. Unitec created income from external research and technology knowledge transfer. From 2012, the definition of this measure has been changed and it excludes the income from building projects. The 2011 figure has been adjusted based on this definition. 2. Figure differs from 2011 Annual Report due to change in definition of this measure. 3. Figure differs from 2011 Annual Report due to data corrections. 4. This measure was approved as a performance indicator outside of the 2011 to 2013 Investment Plan and hence no target was set. 5. This is a new performance indicator and figures are only available for the current year.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Statement of Service Performance

53


Unitec has carried out a survey of graduates every year since 1994. The main focus of the survey is to provide a profile of recent graduates and to explore their employment situation in the months after they received their Unitec qualification. Targets have been set for the response rate of this survey in a drive to improve the reliability of survey estimates. The 2012 Graduate Survey achieved a response rate of 51%, which was 16 percentage points higher than the 2011 survey and met the target set for 2012.

In 2012, a total of 8,481 equivalent full-time students (EFTS) at Unitec were funded by the TEC’s student achievement component (SAC) funding. This figure excludes those funded under the Youth Guarantee Scheme. The 2012 total was 176 EFTS higher than in 2011 and 563 EFTS (6%) below the investment plan EFTS target for 2012. However, in late 2011, Unitec negotiated with TEC through the Mix of Provisions (MOP) process, a revised SAC EFTS target of 8,549 for 2012. The 2012 SAC EFTS was 1% short of the revised target. The number of students receiving education has decreased in 2012, possibly reflecting an improving job market.

51% 35% 33% 21%

22%

Graduate survey response rate for the past five years

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 External research and technology knowledge transfer income has fallen short of target by 71%, however, this is due to a redefinition of items to be included in this category this year. Using the previous definition, Unitec would have achieved the target by 1% ($1,676,000). The 2012 figure represents a 38% increase on the 2011 adjusted figure. Unitec continues to develop its research capability and industry recognition for applied research. The appointment of Business Development Managers to each faculty in 2011 has assisted in ensuring there is an ongoing awareness of this role for Unitec. However, they are operating in a difficult business environment in which to achieve higher levels of external research income. Unitec continues to participate in the development of a framework for applied technology research, development and technology transfer to industry for Auckland.

54

A total of 128 EFTS were funded under the Youth Guarantee Scheme in 2012, a decrease of 1.2% on the 2011 figure. The 2012 result was 80% of target. The number of SAC-funded Māori EFTS at Unitec in 2012 was 4% higher than in 2011. At 11% of all SAC-funded EFTS, the participation rate of Māori students was the same as 2011. Over the same period, the number of SAC- funded students identifying with a Pacific ethnic group increased by 14%. This increase led to a 17% participation rate for Pacific students in 2012, exceeding the target by four percentage points. The above figures match well with the population mix for Māori (11%) and Pacific (15%) in the Auckland region. The proportion of EFTS studying formal programmes at level 4 and above rose from 84% to 86% between 2011 and 2012. This was driven primarily by a fall in the number of EFTS studying at level 2 and a significant increase in the number studying at level 4. Through its mission and via institutional and academic strategies Unitec clearly articulates the importance of effective stakeholder and community engagement. Community/stakeholder engagement is the mechanism by which external stakeholders influence and inform programme development, content and delivery. In December 2010, an Academic Board audit of stakeholder and community engagement at department and programme level was received. In 2011, the Annual Programme Reports included selfassessment on the identification of the industry/community stakeholders for each programme and the means by which stakeholders are engaged in ensuring programme relevance. These reports were provided to faculty academic committees, and received by the Unitec Academic Board, identifying strengths and opportunities for improvement. In 2012, Unitec developed a suite of tools to support collaborative work and resources capability building through the appointment of a Manager Partnerships and Community Engagement. The Unitec Academic Board received summary reports from faculty deans regarding progress on improvement plans. This will be further developed and completed in 2013.


The Auckland Vocational Sector Strategic Industry Engagement Forum with Manukau Institute of Technology and Te Wānanga o Aotearoa has not proceeded in the format originally planned. Unitec had collaborated with Manukau Institute of Techology (MIT) and Te Wānanga o Aotearoa (TWOA) to identify emerging gaps in vocational tertiary provision in the Auckland sub-regions. The product of this collaboration A Strategy for Auckland Tertiary Education Provision (2010) has since guided a cooperative approach to matching programmes and qualifications to the needs of communities at a sub-regional level. Collaborative work between the Auckland tertiary organisations is now being coordinated through the Auckland Tertiary Education Network, which includes in its membership Auckland University of Technology, Massey University, Manukau Institute of Technology, Unitec Institute of Technology and the University of Auckland. The network, supported by Auckland Council, seeks to improve the linking between industry and education provision through a range of work programmes. In 2012, Unitec Institute of Technology and Manukau Institute of Technology completed a scoping project to identify opportunities for collaboration, academic and shared services provision. A framework for assessing opportunities was approved and will be advanced in 2013. The Unitec Stakeholder Engagement Strategy and supporting Stakeholder Plan were reconfirmed in the Unitec Investment Plan 2013 – 2015. The Unitec Stakeholder Engagement Strategy continues to be implemented with the outcomes of engagement being mapped against the Craig and Courtney (2004) Potential of Partnerships Continuum. Since 2010, Unitec has used Annual Programme Reporting to assess and inform the contribution of external engagement to programme development. Work on this strategy is ongoing. Examples of more recent developments include the development of a Health and Social Care Workforce Forum for West Auckland, partnership with Rotary International for the Walk for Water event and the West Auckland Vocational Academy with Massey High School. In 2012, Unitec held multiple events for students and staff showcasing sustainability and various approaches to it across the three campuses. Staff and students both became more aware of Unitec’s commitment to sustainability, with surveys showing that 68% of staff and 67% students see Unitec as environmentally responsible. At the end of year staff awards, the sustainability team won the Chief Executive’s Award in recognition of the hard work the team has put in over the past year.

A1.2: Outputs Components

Key indicators

Achieved 2012 Actual

2012 Target

Vocational education that meets the needs of students/ employers

Employer Satisfaction: Develop and run the initial survey

No Not completed

Vocational education that meets the needs of students/ employers

Employer Satisfaction: Improvement programme and targets for 2012 and 2013 based off 2011 baseline

Undertake NA Not completed6 improvement plans and set targets for 2013

Vocational education that meets the needs of students/ employers

Relevance of qualification to graduate employment7

No 74%

2011 Actual

Undertake survey

>75%

NA5

NA5

73%

While Unitec started working with other institutes in 2011, this project did not come to fruition in 2012 and was disestablished as a work stream. This is now seen as being a broader initiative than purely an Employer Satisfaction Survey and Unitec is looking to develop the survey to have a wider scope and increased relevance to the economy and measure Unitec’s place within that economy. Unitec has commenced scoping and benchmarking work that will be built on in 2013. This is now a part of Unitec’s ‘highly productive talent’ project and this information will be gathered throughout 2013 for this strategic objective. Unitec is also participating in national measurement planning in this area. The percentage of graduates moving into jobs related to their qualification was one percentage point more than the 2011 figure, reflecting slight changes in the labour market situation.

6. As a result of not completing the employer satisfaction survey, this performance indicator has no figures available. 7. Proportion of respondents gaining employment who ranked their qualification as ‘highly’ or ‘moderately’ relevant to gaining employment.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Statement of Service Performance

55


A2: Enhancing the student experience

A1.3: Processes Components

Key indicators

Engagement with industry and communities

Redevelopment of programme external advisory bodies off 2010 baseline

Achieved

2012 Actual

2012 Target

2011 Actual

No

>90%

100%

33%

All programmes have advisory mechanisms for engaging with external stakeholders but as yet not all are acceptably robust. Strengthening of engagement within Medical Imaging, Language Studies, Automotive Engineering and Marine will be priorities in 2013. Further, the Unitec Strategic Framework has been launched with a philosophy of creating Highly Productive Talent. This refers to talent in our staff, students and industry, and requires cross-cutting actions to increase innovation, a shift from transactional to collaborative relationships. An ecosystem approach to engagement will be adopted. This will involve Unitec disciplines working with clusters of stakeholders that include professional and employer bodies, individual employers and practitioners, graduates and communities, and other providers.

A2.1: Impacts Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Estimate

2012 Target

2011 Actual

People progress to higher levels of learning

Progression: L1-3 for all SAC-funded students

No

38% – 42%8

>60%

38%9

People progress to higher levels of learning

Progression: L1-3 for SACfunded Māori students

No

52% – 53%8

>60%

52%9

People progress to higher levels of learning

Progression: L1-3 for SACfunded Pacific students

No

45% – 53%8

>60%

45%9

People progress to higher levels of learning

Progression: L1-3 for SAC-funded students who are under 25

No

52% – 53%8

>60%

52%9

Student progression and successful course completion for SAC-funded students are measured by TEC, using information supplied by Unitec and other tertiary education institutions, as two of four EPIs. The student progression relates to the student outcome across all study not just at one institution. The final indicators for 2012 will be available in mid-2013. The 2012 figures for student progression are an estimate based on the 2011 outcome and historical data, which Unitec considers the best available estimate for 2012, after considering the current environment. Preliminary information available internally to Unitec will be combined with other information available to the TEC to produce the final measure. For SAC-funded students, the rate of progression in 2011 declined significantly, due to a 50% increase in student qualification levels completed, while the number of student qualification levels progressed only increased by 8%. This increase in qualification levels completed was the result of Unitec systematically improving the business processes relating to this measure, which resulted in a step-change improvement in 2011 actual results. A similar trend is exhibited across the target groups.

8. Figures for 2012 are preliminary estimates and subject to change. 9. Figure differs from 2011 Annual Report, which reported an estimated figure for 2011.

56


Thirty-eight percent of SAC-funded Unitec students completing qualifications at levels 1 to 3 progressed to a higher level programme at a New Zealand tertiary education organisation in 2011.This rate was lower than 2010 by 10 percentage points. The progression decline was driven by a 50% increase in student qualification levels completed, while the number of student qualification levels progressed only increased by 7%. Māori and Pacific students, and students under 25 years all experienced declines in their progression rates between 2010 and 2011. Level 1 programmes at Unitec are for students with special needs and are specifically designed to help people move into the workforce.

A2.2: Outputs Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Actual

2012 Target

2011 Actual

Student achievement

Successful course completion rate for all SAC-funded students

Yes

79%8

77%

79%9

Student achievement

Successful course completion rate for SAC-funded Māori students

Yes

74%8

72%

73%9

Student achievement

Successful course completion rate for SAC-funded Pacific students

Yes

68%8

66%

66%9

Student achievement

Successful course completion rate for SAC-funded students who are under 25

NA

76%8

NA4

76%9

Graduate willingness to recommend10 Unitec to others

Yes

Vocational education that meets the needs of students/ employers

The measure for successful course completion is an estimate pending release of the final Education Performance Indicators by TEC in mid-2013. The 2012 figure for successful course completion is based on preliminary information available internally to Unitec. This will be combined with other information available to the TEC to produce the final measure, however, in this case, the internal available information is considered the best estimate available at this time. Rates of successful course completion by SAC-funded students in 2012 showed little change from the previous year for SAC-funded Māori and Pacific students. Unitec rates of successful course completion for all SAC-funded students closely matched the Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics (ITP) median rates across all programme levels. The willingness of graduates to recommend Unitec to others remained at the same high level as in 2011. At least nine out of every 10 respondents in the annual graduate survey reported that they would definitely or possibly recommend Unitec to others as a place to study.

A2.3: Processes

93%

>90%

93%

Components Key indicators

Student support

Student Satisfaction11 Survey: Overall satisfaction with student support services and facilities from the biennial student satisfaction survey

Achieved

2012 Actual

No

72%

2012 2011 Target Actual >75%

NA12

A Student Satisfaction Survey was run on behalf of Unitec in 2012 by USU, the Students’ Association at Unitec. The survey captures information on students’ satisfaction with specified services and facilities at Unitec. When asked to rate overall satisfaction with their experience at Unitec, 72% of students gave a ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ response in 2012. Satisfaction of priority learner groups (Māori and Pacific) was higher than for all students. The number of students who indicated they would recommend Unitec to others increased from 68% in 2010 to 75% in 2012.

10. Proportion of graduates who will ‘definitely’ or ‘possibly’ recommend Unitec to others. 11. Proportion of students who are ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’. 12. This survey was not run in 2011. It is run biennially.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Statement of Service Performance

57


A3: Innovation in teaching and learning A3.1: Outputs Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Actual

Enhanced environmental sustainability Enhanced environmental sustainability

2012 2011 Target Actual

Percentage of programmes with sustainability content

Yes

15%

15%

NA5

Number of sustainable research outputs

Yes

218

>=3

NA5

12

Vocational education that meets the needs of students/ employers

Student Engagement: Undertake biennial AUSSE survey

Yes Completed Undertake survey

Applied research and knowledge transfer

Quality-assured research outputs (using 2010 figure as baseline)

Yes

3858

380

NA

Out of all the quality-assured research outputs in 2012, approximately 5% were environment sustainable related. The Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE) survey was conducted in mid-August. A systematic random sample of 2,294 firstyear and 2,347 later-year on-shore students was drawn from the total population. One thousand and ten students responded in total, giving an overall response rate of 22%. The results released in December show Unitec improved on its 2010 scores on all scales of student engagement: workintegrated learning, supportive learning environment, enriching educational experiences, student and staff interactions, active learning and academic challenge. Overall student satisfaction also improved.

58

A3.2: Processes Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Actual

Deliver high quality and relevant courses

Curriculum Redevelopment: Proportion of programmes redeveloped with Living Curriculum tick

No

55%

66%

29%

Deliver high quality and relevant courses

Programmes covered by annual programme reporting process: With results as input to evaluative questioning framework

Yes

100%

100%

100%

Deliver high quality and relevant courses

Rubric for measuring course quality through evaluation

No

NA13

NA4

NA5

Work- and practice-based learning

Proportion of Unitec programmes with embedded workbased learning practices

Yes

>90%

>90%

NA14

4529

Sustainability has been recognised as an essential part of the curriculum at Unitec. With this in mind, it has been added as a requirement of the Living Curriculum, and a goal of 15% of programmes with sustainability content was easily met this year, with 19 programmes officially recognised as now having this content.

13. Figure not available when this report was prepared. 14. This performance measure was suspended in 2011 and hence no data is available for 2011.

Research outputs are collected on a continuous basis throughout the year and are subject to verification by departmental research committees and reported to the Unitec Research Committee and Academic Board. Figures reported here for 2012 should be considered preliminary as figures were not finalised when this report was being prepared. The 2011 quality-assured research outputs increased dramatically over the previous year. This reflects both the nature of the six-yearly Performance Based Research Fund cycle (where 2011 was the final year of the cycle) and the fact that considerable emphasis has been placed on improving internal systems to capture and verify as much of Unitec’s research activity as possible.

2012 2011 Target Actual


By the end of the year, 66 programmes (55%) had achieved the Living Curriculum tick. As was the case in 2011, the shortfall is in part caused by the 'New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) Targeted Review of Qualifications (TRoQs)', which is impacting on many programmes at levels 1 – 6. Electrotechnology and building technology programmes have been affected in particular. Further, a number of business programmes were given short-term extensions because of changes to strategy priorities in this area; several programmes in the foundation studies area were put on hold because of a major review, and several proposals were rejected at the end of the year and require rework. ‘Annual Programme Reporting’ has morphed into Programme Evaluation Reporting so that it is an ongoing process rather than a one-off annual event. This is still subject to close scrutiny by the Faculty Executive Dean but this might now be every three or 18 months, depending on the ability to respond to performance information and quality of engagement with stakeholders, the evaluative questioning and the action planning and execution. In 2011, we indicated that the institutional rubric for measuring course quality through evaluation will be replacing the measure related to Student Evaluation of Quality (SEQUAL). The institutional rubric is being used for the first time in 2012 for reporting course quality. Programmes will be reporting against the rubric in the process of their programme evaluation reporting, which takes place in March/April. Information at institutional level will be available following that process. The AUSSE survey includes a rating for work-integrated learning, which is based on student responses to questions on: blended academic learning with workplace experience; improved knowledge and skills that will contribute to employment; exploration of how to apply learning to the workplace; industry placement or work experience; acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills. The 2012 results show a two-point improvement over the 2010 result, that is, from 50 to 52.

A4: Being an excellent business A4.1: Impacts Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Actual

2012 Target

2011 Actual

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Resource utilisation: Energy (MWh)

No

13.478

<12.58

13.42

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Resource utilisation: Water (m3)

Yes

83,5208

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Resource utilisation: Waste (tonnes)

No

385

<371.7

388

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Resource utilisation: Paper (tonnes)

Yes

114

<134

1409

Enhanced environmental sustainability

Biodiversity: Macroinvertebrate Community Index

NA

69.8

NA4

NA5

<97,623 102,534

Over the past year more than 1,600 native plants were planted by Unitec staff and students, Waterview Primary School children and local community groups as the first stage of restoring the Wairaka Stream at Mt Albert campus. Greening our campus is seen as a priority by both Unitec students and staff. The introduction of: food scraps composting; staff mini bins; doublesided printing; replacing leaking water mains; establishing a sustainable arboretum; a bike rack design competition; worm farms at both on-site childcare centres; green building features within the wharekai and a carpooling service have all reinforced our commitment to sustainability on campus. The total waste generated by Unitec reduced by three tonnes in 2012. There was a significant reduction in waste generated by offices and classrooms, which was unfortunately offset by an increase in construction and demolition waste and the clearance of campus storage area. This will remain a key area of focus for 2013. A new system of weighing all bins at Mt Albert campus has now been introduced, which will mean much more accurate and comprehensive data on waste generation in 2013. Unitec now has a fully developed online Environmental Management System. This positions Unitec to seek ISO14001 certification in 2013, bringing Unitec into line with best international business practices and

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Statement of Service Performance

59


positioning the institution to work towards full sustainability reporting in the future. Accessible to all Unitec staff, students and our key stakeholders, the eco-portal online platform ensures that Unitec remains fully accountable for its commitments and encourages staff and student engagement.

The 2012 Unitec Staff Survey was conducted over the period 9 - 30 August 2012 and 886 staff members (79%) responded to the survey. This survey represents another stage in the continuing process of organisational development through employee feedback. The pattern of results from the 2012 survey is similar to that of the 2010 survey. However, scores have generally increased. Scores have also been compared (where possible) to the shorter Pulse Survey conducted in 2011; again scores have improved in most areas. Key strengths emerging from the 2012 survey include: overall engagement and job satisfaction; a strong sense of teamwork and staff’s clear understanding of how they contribute to the success of Unitec.

A4.2: Inputs – General Components

Key indicators

Staff engagement

Achieve second quartile versus benchmark staff engagement in Voice Project Survey

Achieved

2012 Actual

2012 2011 Target Actual

Yes Completed Undertake survey

NA5

Overall the 2012 Survey indicates that 82% of our staff were satisfied with their job, compared with 77% in the 2010 full survey. The budgeted net surplus for 2012 was not achieved mainly due to over expenditure in labour, with unbudgeted redundancies and higher-thanbudgeted levels of staff numbers the major factor. This was due to the labour costs associated with the delivery of the strategic initiatives, unbudgeted

A4.3: Inputs – Financial performance indicators Components

Key indicators

Achieved

2012 Actual

2012 Target

2011 Actual

Financial performance indicators

Net surplus/average equity (%)

No

2.3

4.1

2.4

Financial performance indicators

Gearing (%)/net debt to equity (%)

Yes

1.9

≤5.4

5.1

Financial performance indicators

Total revenue ($000)

Yes

$152,533

$148,222

$142,6583

Financial performance indicators

Total cash expenditure ($000)

No

$133,308

≤$124,486

$125,6733

Financial performance indicators

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation ($000)

No

$19,225

$23,741

$16,9853

Financial performance indicators

Depreciation ($000)

No

$13,386

≤$13,329

$12,193

Financial performance indicators

Interest ($000)

Yes

$318

≤$1,725

$161

Financial performance indicators

Net surplus ($000)

No

$5,521

$8,687

$4,6313

Financial performance indicators

Net cash (debt) ($000)

No

-$1,256

$11,767

-$6,748

Students

Total EFTS

No

10,770

10,946

10,6223

Infrastructure

CAMS 15

Not due

NA

NA

NA

Staff

EFTS: Total full-time equivalent (FTE)

No

8.9

9.7

8.7

No

0.95%

4.30%

0.86%

Staff

Professional development commitment

16

15. Capital Asset Management System. 16. Total professional development commitment (including allocation of time through contractual entitlement, targeted funds and People Capability budget) as a percentage of total labour budget.

60


restructuring costs and additional guest and part-time teaching staff. Total revenue, while higher than that predicted in the Investment Plan, was only slightly ahead of Unitec’s 2012 Budget. This was due to lower-thananticipated growth in domestic EFTS and also lower levels of income from external research.

Staff Training and Development expenditure is below budgeted levels, higher than in 2011, but still well below Investment Plan targets. Current reporting does not quantify the staff salary cost of days spent on training and development.

Cash expenditure levels have increased in line with revenue increases but these are much higher than those initially predicted in the Investment Plan. This is due to expected efficiencies from some operational activities not being realised in the planned timeframe and has led to the development of four key strategic initiatives, which will be progressively implemented over the next three years. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation is down on the target due mainly to higher expenditure levels, but shows an improvement on 2011. Depreciation is only slightly higher than target due to timing differences on major projects and also changes to the mix of major projects from that originally anticipated in the Investment Plan. Interest levels have been lower than targets due to good cash management and lower-than-anticipated borrowing requirements due to reduced levels of capital expenditure. The net surplus is lower than Unitec’s annual budget of $5.250 million due mainly to higher labour costs and this resulted in the non-achievement of the Investment Plan target. The net cash position has improved over 2011 due to reduced levels of capital expenditure, but is well short of the Investment Plan target due to the operational efficiencies not being realised as outlined above. A total of 10,770 EFTS were delivered in 2012, an increase of 1.4% on the 2011 figure. The 2012 result was 98% of target. The Investment Plan includes a target for the Capital Asset Management processes used by Unitec to be improved. This includes the need to improve the Asset Management Plan and supporting processes during the term of the Investment Plan. A base measurement was carried out by SPM (an asset management company) and the TEC and another review will be carried out in 2013. The measure 'EFTS:Total FTE' is the ratio of equivalent full-time students to total full-time equivalent staff. This is an efficiency measurement that tries to measure the efficiency of the staff and is a worldwide benchmark measurement factor. Lower domestic EFTS performance and slightly higher staffing levels in the faculties and student administration areas, and redundancies led to higher costs from that originally set in the Investment Plan, which has led to the net cash target not being achieved.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť Statement of Service Performance

61


Part B Part B of the Statement of Service Performance covers performance measures that are not included in the Unitec Investment Plan.

Five-year trend showing the employment and study combinations from the graduate survey

These measures assist management in assessing progress against the targets set out in Part A and act as ‘lead’ indicators of progress or as indicators to assist in interpretation of the formal measures.

2008

No formal targets have been set against these performance measures.

B1: Meeting the needs of our communities

11%

Key indicators

Graduates are achieving employment success

86%

2009

B1.1: Outcomes Components

62%

12% 12% 14%

2012 Actual

2011 Actual

Graduates studying, working or combining both

82%

83%

Graduates are achieving employment success

Graduates not employed and seeking work (not studying)

15%

Graduates are achieving employment success

Graduates neither employed nor looking for work (not studying)

15%

17%

77%

49%

23%

2010

2011 3%

2%

Employment outcomes for Unitec graduates are an important indicator of the relevance of our qualifications and the quality of our graduates. Eightytwo percent of respondents reported in the 2012 Graduate Survey that they were either in paid work, studying or both working and studying when surveyed. Seventeen percent were studying only, 51% employed only and 14% were both employed and studying. These figures were very similar to those in the 2011 survey except that the employed only figure dropped by six percentage points. The figure for both employed and studying was up by four percentage points.

10%

57%

16% 17%

83%

2012 17% 14% 18%

51%

Working only Studying only Neither working nor studying Both working and studying Working, studying or both working and studying

62

84%

55%

16% 13% 16%

82%


B1.2: Outcomes

B1.2: Outputs

Components

Key indicators

2012 Estimate

2011 Actual

Student achievement

EPI: Successful Qualification Completions: All SAC-funded students

57% – 59%8

57%9

EPI: Successful Qualification Completions: SACfunded Māori students

44% – 45%8

EPI: Successful Qualification Completions: SACfunded Pacific students

8

42% – 43%

EPI: Successful Qualification Completions: SACfunded students who are under 25

51% – 54%8

Student achievement

Student achievement

Student achievement

Components

Key indicators

EFTS by funding source

Government funded 17

EFTS by funding source

International

EFTS by funding source 45%9

9

42%

51%9

As noted previously, measures of educational performance for the tertiary sector are calculated by the TEC and will be released in mid-2013. Qualification completion rates for SAC-funded students are measured using an EFTS-weighted qualification completion rate. The 2012 figures for qualification completion rates are estimates based on 2011 outcomes and historical data, which Unitec considers the best available estimate for 2012, after considering the current environment. These figures are subject to change. As stated previously, the increase in qualification levels completed was the result of Unitec systematically improving the business processes relating to this measure, which resulted in an improvement in 2011 actual results. A similar trend is exhibited across the target groups. Unitec completion rates increased slightly in 2011 compared with 2010 across all monitored student groups. The rate for all SAC-funded students increased from 52% in 2010 to 57% in 2011.

Other funding

18

EFTS by funding source

Total EFTS

EFTS by programme level

Level 8 and over

2012 Actual

2011 Actual3

8,779

8,617

1,677

1,714

314

290

10,770

10,622

498

486

EFTS by programme level

Level 7

4,475

4,407

EFTS by programme level

Levels 5 and 6

2,128

2,090

EFTS by programme level

Level 4 and under

3,257

3,204

EFTS by programme level

Non-formal education 19

413

435

10,770

10,622

5,922

5,686

57%

56%

16,203

16,699

5,310

5,479

21,221

21,84820

EFTS by programme level

Total EFTS

First-year formal EFTS

EFTS in first year of formal programmes

First-year formal EFTS

EFTS in first year of formal programmes as a percentage of all EFTS in formal programmes

Student numbers

In formal programmes

Student numbers

In non-formal education

Student numbers

Total

The major service provided by Unitec is education. Education output, defined in accordance with guidance from the Office of the Auditor General on what is an output compared with an input or outcome, is measured by the number of EFTS taught during the year. Between 2011 and 2012, EFTS taught at Unitec increased by 1.4%. This small change was driven by a 1.9% rise in government-funded EFTS and an 8.3% rise in students funded from other sources.

17. Government funded include: SAC, Youth Guarantee and Adult and Community Education (ACE). 18. Other funding sources include: Ministry of Health, Industry Training Organisation (ITO), Training Opportunities Programmes (TOPS), Secondary Tertiary Alignment Resource (STAR), other contracts and self-funded students. 19. Includes STAR students. 20. Total is not the sum of above as some students take both formal and non-formal courses in the same year.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Statement of Service Performance

63


Five-year trend showing student EFTS at Unitec

Non-formal education includes Adult and Community Education (ACE) and self-funded courses that cannot be credited towards a formal qualification. EFTS taught in this category fell by 5% between 2011 and 2012. EFTS in formal programmes at level 4 and below had risen by 2% while programmes above level 4 also saw a 2% increase in EFTS between the two years. The number of EFTS in the first year of a formal programme at Unitec rose by 4% between 2011 and 2012. They made up 57% of all EFTS in formal education in 2012.

2008 183

1,461

9,003

7,360

2009 1,460

137

10,165

8,567

2010 1,547

272

10,504

8,685

2011 1,714

290

10,622

8,617

B2: Enhancing the student experience B2.1: Impacts

2012 1,677

314

Other funding

10,770

8,779

International EFTS

Govt-funded EFTS

Total EFTS

Components

Key indicators

2012 Estimate

2011 Actual

Student Retention

EPI: Successful Programme Retention21: All SAC-funded students

59% – 61%

8

59%9

Student Retention

EPI: Successful Programme Retention: SACfunded Māori students

52% – 54%8

52%9

Student Retention

EPI: Successful Programme Retention: SACfunded Pacific students

58% – 60%8

58%9

Student Retention

EPI: Successful Programme Retention: SACfunded students who are under 25

67% – 69%8

67%9

The total number of students studying at Unitec was lower in 2012 than in 2011 by 634 or 3%.

Five-year trend showing the student headcounts at Unitec

2008 6,071

22,205

16,134

2009 5,117

23,038

17,921

2010 5,613

23,841

18,228

2011 5,149

16,699

21,848

2012 5,018

Student numbers in non-formal education only

16,203

Student numbers in formal education

21,221

Total students

The retention of SAC-funded students is measured by the TEC using a student continuation or completion rate. The rate gives the proportion of SAC-funded students studying in a particular year that returned to Unitec within 12 months or completed their qualification. The 2012 figures for student retention rates are estimates based on 2011 outcomes and historical data, which Unitec considers the best available estimate for 2012, after considering the current environment and the low level of change between the two years. These figures are subject to change. Between 2010 and 2011, student retention rates at Unitec remained relatively static across

21. The EPI terminology is 'Students Retained in Study' rather than 'Successful Programme Retention'. This terminology was also used in the Investment Plan 2013 – 2015.

64


all monitored student groups. For all SAC-funded students the retention declined from 64% in 2010 to 59% in 2011. Students undertaking lower level qualifications (4 and below) saw a small decline in retention over this period, compared with the greatest increase in retention over previous years. The number of students re-enrolled from 2010 to 2011 declined by 11%, while the number of students completing qualifications declined by 10%, which led to a lower overall retention rate.

B2.2: Impacts Components

Key indicators

Students are Graduates willing willing to return to to return to Unitec Unitec for further for further study study

2012 Actual

2011 Actual

53%

53%

In the 2012 Graduate Survey, 53% percent of all respondents reported that they were either enrolled at Unitec or interested in doing further study at Unitec. This figure is unchanged from the 2011 figure.

B4: Being an excellent business B4.1: Processes Components

Key indicators

2012 Actual 2011 Actual

Academic staff are Degree qualified as a suitably qualified percentage of academic FTE

83%

79%

Academic staff are Postgraduate qualified as a suitably qualified percentage of academic FTE

60%

60%

Academic staff are Doctorate qualified as a suitably qualified percentage of academic FTE

15%

13%

This year has seen an increase in the percentage of staff holding degree qualifications and doctorates. Staff holding degree qualifications increased by four percentage points while staff holding doctorate qualifications increased by two percentage points. There is no change in the percentage of those holding postgraduate qualifications.

Five-year trend showing the qualification levels of the academic staff at Unitec

2008

B3: Innovation in teaching and learning

19%

B3.1: Inputs

81%

54%

2009

Components

Key indicators

Literacy and numeracy

Proportion of L1-3 programmes with embedded literacy and numeracy

2012 Actual

2011 Actual

85%

80%

Increasingly, in 2012, Unitec looked at a whole organisation approach to literacy and numeracy embedding. This involved: a day-long strategy meeting in June with the National Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy, the development of a multi-literacies framework and strategy to encompass courses and programmes beyond levels 1 – 3, the use of the assessment tool in programmes beyond level 3, the redevelopment of the foundation education programmes and other programmes in line with the Living Curriculum. In addition, Unitec continued delivery of the National Certificate in Adult Literacy and Numeracy Education (NCALNE) to a further 17 teachers, increased the uptake of the assessment tool and promoted Pathways Awarua.

61%

12%

72%

2010 62%

12%

74%

2011 60%

13%

79%

2012 15%

Degree qualified staff

60%

Postgraduate qualified staff

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

83%

Doctorate qualified staff

Âť Statement of Service Performance

65


66


Governance Report for the year ended 31 December 2012


1. Council functions and duties Functions The functions and responsibilities of Unitec Council, in accordance with section 180 of the Education Act 1989, are: (a) to appoint a chief executive in accordance with the State Sector Act 1988, and to monitor and evaluate his or her performance; (b) to prepare and submit a proposed plan if the institution is seeking funding under a funding mechanism that provides for funding via plans; (c) if the institution has a plan: (i) to ensure that the institution is managed in accordance with that plan; and (ii) to determine policies to implement that plan; (d) to determine, subject to the State Sector Act 1988, the policies of the institution in relation to the management of its affairs; (e) to undertake planning relating to the institution’s long-term strategic direction.

2. Accountability and communication Under the Education Act 1989, Council is accountable to the responsible Minister and provides regular reports and other informal communication. In addition, transparency of decision making and process is maintained by conducting open meetings, and by making minutes, papers and other publications available upon request.

3. Council structure and membership In accordance with the Act, Unitec Council comprises eight members. Four members are appointed by the Minister for Tertiary Education and four by the Appointments Committee in accordance with a Unitec Appointment Statute that reflects the skills required.

Members of the Unitec Council during 2012 were: Name

Date Appointed

A Blackburn

9/7/2007

Duties

D Harry

Chair, Audit & Risk Committee

5/5/2008

The duty of Unitec Council, in accordance with section 181 of the Education Act 1989, is

A Hudson

Chair, Appointments Committee

1/5/2010

(a) to strive to ensure that the institution attains the highest standards of excellence in education, training and research; (b) to acknowledge the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; (c) to encourage the greatest possible participation by the communities served by the institution so as to maximise the educational potential of all members of those communities with particular emphasis on groups in those communities that are under-represented among the students of the institution; (d) to ensure that the institution does not discriminate unfairly against any person; (e) to ensure that the institution operates in a financially responsible manner that ensures the efficient use of resources and maintains the institution's long-term viability; (f) to ensure that proper standards of integrity, conduct and concern for:

68

(i) the public interest; and

(ii) the wellbeing of students attending the institution are maintained.

C O’Connor

1/5/2005

K Turner

Deputy Chair of Council

E van Arkel

Chair of Council and Chair, Executive Committee

D Kidd M Udale

15/12/2009 28/2/2005 1/05/2011

Chair of Property Committee

1/05/2011


In accordance with section 193 of the Education Act of 1989, the Council has the authority to form committees to enable it to perform its functions efficiently and effectively. Accordingly, Unitec Council has five committees as follows:

5. Council and committee fees

»» The Property Committee

Unitec Council members are paid fees, in accordance with the Cabinet Office Circular Co (09) 5 Fees Framework for Members of Statutory and Other Bodies Appointed by the Crown. Unitec Council members’ fees were set within the maximum levels established for polytechnics by the Minister for Tertiary Education.

»» The Appointments Committee (no meetings held in 2012)

Fees paid during the year to Council members meetings are as follows:

»» The Audit and Risk Committee

»» The Executive Committee (no meetings held in 2012)

Council and committee fees

»» Fono Faufautua – Pasifika Committee. The Unitec Council is also advised by the Unitec Rūnanga on all issues affecting Māori.

4. Council and committee attendance Council meets on a monthly basis. The Council holds extra meetings when required for strategic planning or other specific issues. Attendance at Council and committee meetings during 2012 was as follows:

January – December 2012 Council

A Blackburn

Property

Audit & Risk

Held

Attended

Held

Attended

Held

Attended

11

9

5

5

6

4

A Hudson

11

9

-

-

6

4

C O’Connor

11

9

5

5

6

5

D Harry

11

10

-

-

6

6

D Kidd

11

9

5

5

6

6

K Turner

11

10

-

-

-

-

M Udale

11

11

5

5

-

-

E van Arkel

11

11

5

4

6

5

The above tables record attendance of those Council members who are members of the relevant committees and are recorded as being present. Other Council members are welcome to attend committee meetings and a number do take this opportunity to keep themselves fully informed. Members of Council also attended a full-day strategy planning meeting.

Name

Council fees

A Blackburn

16,000.00

A Hudson

16,000.00

C O’Connor

16,000.00

D Harry

16,000.00

D Kidd

16,000.00

E van Arkel (Chair)

32,000.00

K Turner (Deputy Chair)

20,000.00

M Udale

16,000.00

6. Council register of interests Council maintains an interest register and ensures members are aware of their obligation to declare conflicts of interest. The register identifies areas where a Council member has an interest that could lead to a potential conflict. In addition to the register, members are invited to declare any specific conflicts at the commencement of each meeting. The following two pages reference Council member interests were recorded in the Interest Register during 2012:

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Governance Report

69


Name

Interest

Anne Blackburn

A director of Forsyth Barr

Date of new disclosure

A director of New Zealand Venture Investment Fund A director of Auckland Council Property Ltd

27-Sept-10

Chair of Royal District Nursing Service (NZ) Ltd

27-Sept-10

Chair of Centre for Clinical Research and Effective Practice A beneficiary and/or legal shareholder of Ten Gracie Square Ltd A director of Warren and Mahoney architectural practice

01-April-11

A director of Eastland Group Limited (and subsidiaries)

26-Sept-11

A director of Fidelity Life A director of TSB Bank Aroha Hudson

A director of Auckland Primary Health Organisation

31-Oct-11 24-Sept-12 01-Nov-10

A director of Te Hononga o Tamaki me Hoturoa A director of Heart Foundation A director of Primary Options Ltd A trustee of Wellness Out West Trust An employee of Healthwest Limited A member of Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, University of Auckland A director of the National MÄ ori Primary Health Organisation Coalition Incorporated Charmian O’Connor

A trustee of The Kate Edger Educational Charitable Trust A consultant to Photonz NZ Ltd

Dinu Harry

06-Nov-10

9-Mar-09

A director of The Diamond Cutting Company Limited A director of Towai Land Holdings Limited A director of K F Cunningham Trustee Company (2008) Limited A director of K F Cunningham Trustee Company (2009) Limited A director of Bertelsen Harry Waters Limited A director of Central Park Business Services Limited A director of GM Uni Trustee Company Limited A director of Forefront Trustee Company Limited A director of BHW Trustee SHA 110 Limited

27- Sept-10

A director of BHW Trustee COW100 Limited A trustee of a number of family trusts A director of Public Trust 70

27-Sept-10 2-May-11


Name

Interest

Date of new disclosure

A director of BHW 2011 Limited

Dianne Kidd

26-Mar-12

A director of BHW 2012 Limited

26-Mar-12

A trustee of Unitec Trust

28-May-12

A director of The Co Operative Bank Limited A director of AsureQuality Limited Chairman of the Helensville District Health Trust A director of Helensville Birthing Centre Ltd A trustee of Helensville Women and Family Centre A member of Workplace Savings NZ Council

29-Aug-11

A member of Women in Super

29-Aug-11

Kaye Turner

Chair of Council Manukau Institute of Technology (MIT)

Martin Udale

A director of Waikato Innovation Park (and related entities)

8-Sept-10 10-Dec-12 (name change from Innovation Waikato Limited)

A director and chair of Tamaki Redevelopment Company Ltd

20-Dec-12

A director and stakeholder of Essentia Consulting Group A trustee of Eladu Trust A trustee of Auckland Community Housing Trust A director of Canvas Investments (and related entities)

31-Dec-11

A director and shareholder of Unifold Australasia Limited

Ted van Arkel

A director of Eden Agricapital GP Limited

26-Mar-12

A director of Cranleigh Merchant Bank

30-Apr-12

A director of Danske Mobler Ltd (private company) A director of Auckland Regional Chamber of Commerce A director of Lang Properties Ltd A director of van Arkel & Co Ltd A director of Allied Work Force Group Ltd Chairman of Restaurant Brands Ltd Chair of Council, Unitec Institute of Technology Chair of Health Benefits Ltd A director of Nestle NZ Ltd

01-Nov-10

A director of The Warehouse Group Ltd

01-July-11

A director of Abano Healthcare Group Ltd

01-July-11

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť Governance Report

71


7. Investing in our staff Unitec encourages the growth of highly productive talented staff through its recruitment practices, engagement activities, and professional development and support. In 2012, the development of 'The Unitec Way' set out the principles that guide us in the way we approach and do things at Unitec. The Unitec Way integrates our guiding principles of Kaitiakitanga (Guardianship); Mahi Kotahitanga (Cooperation); Whakaritenga (Legitimacy); Rangatiratanga (Authority and Responsibility); and Ngakau Mahaki (Respect) with how we drive success at Unitec through Being the Connector; Creating Possibilities; Making it Work; and Keeping it Fresh. This is an important set of principles, helping to engage our people to contribute to achieving our vision: To be a world-class, world-scale institute of technology contributing to a productive and socially cohesive society. Several major projects were implemented in 2012. The IT Support Centre was refocused to become an excellent business with a mandate to establish a customer-focused, professional and operational team. A Business Improvement Programme (BIP) was established to improve our services to students, especially around enrolment. The key objective was to provide more online facilities to staff and students to provide quicker turnaround of critical activities. A key achievement was the ability to view student applicant enrolment progress online. As part of the continued implementation of the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy, Towards Inclusive Excellence, we expanded our Intercultural Learning and Dialogue programme in 2012. The programme won recognition as a finalist in the Institute of Public Administration New Zealand (IPANZ) Gen-I Public Sector Excellence Awards. In addition, it was acknowledged at the 2012 EEO Trust Life and Work Awards and received a certificate of recognition from the Office of Ethnic Affairs for its success in equipping staff to communicate across social and cultural boundaries. In 2012, the programme was also expanded into the classroom with a pilot in the Department of Nursing. In addition, in conjunction with the University of Western Australia, Unitec implemented the Ally Network Programme (Ally). Now in 17 Australian universities, Ally is an initiative that aims to create an inclusive environment for diverse sexualities and genders. Unitec is the first New Zealand tertiary institution to utilise this programme. The Ally Network is made up of staff and students who want to support the building of an inclusive working and learning environment for all.

72

Unitec demonstrates a sound commitment to the professional and personal development of staff and encourages all staff to enhance their academic qualifications by enrolling in courses and programmes, particularly those offered by Unitec. The institute also provides a variety of development activities for all staff. Over the past 12 months, these have included development initiatives targeted at teaching, research, administration-related skills and leadership skills. The Professional Development Fund for allied and monthly paid staff was awarded to 22 staff members. This has provided them with the opportunity to develop skills, knowledge and attributes that complement organisational and work unit goals, as well as to support career development activities that extend and enhance individual capabilities and capacity. In 2012, a pilot Professional Development Points Programme was conducted in six departments. The purpose of this programme is to provide managers and staff with the tools to plan, implement and evaluate professional development opportunities for every staff member at Unitec. This supports Unitec’s strategy of being an excellent business through establishing and pursuing continuous organisational quality improvement and having staff who are suitably qualified, developed and engaged. This programme will be implemented throughout Unitec, commencing in March 2013. A key focus for Unitec in 2012 was on working collaboratively with faculties and directorates to develop team and individual performance, build leadership and change capability, provide a framework to enable new employees to quickly and effectively integrate into Unitec’s organisational culture, as well as the provision of an annual suite of blended learning and development opportunities aligned with organisational needs. In August 2012, a full staff engagement survey was conducted. An external consultant, the Voice Project, was appointed to manage the survey. A response rate of 79% was achieved, and the results indicate that the pattern of results is similar to that of the last full survey (2010), however, scores have generally increased. Key strengths emerging from the survey include: overall engagement and job satisfaction; a strong sense of teamwork and staff members' clear understanding of how they contribute to the success of Unitec. The focus of the Health and Safety team this year has been staff health. A health and wellbeing survey was conducted mid-year with motivating results providing extensive information for the development of a fuller future wellness programme. The Health Expo offered to staff in November was very well received and initiated the beginning of the Thrive@Unitec wellness programme. The Voice survey results indicated a growing increase in health and safety awareness, with a 12% and 8% increase respectively from the 2010 results. This year also saw a review of the Smokefree/ Auahi Kore Policy by a Unitec-wide representative team, resulting in the recommendation for Unitec to go 100% smokefree from 31 May 2013.


Unitec was recognised for the implementation of its Environmental Sustainability Strategy this year, winning the 2012 Sustainable Business Network Trailblazer Not for Profit Award, an award distributed to those organisations that show leadership in sustainability. Unitec also led the way by becoming the first New Zealand signatory of the United Nations Commitment to Sustainable Practices of Higher Education Institutions. Comprehensive plans to integrate sustainability into our curriculum, research and campus operations have been developed and are now being led by an active network of over 160 staff and student eco-reps. As a result, over two-thirds of staff and students now see Unitec as an environmentally responsible organisation. Current employment-related policies and strategies include: »» Code of conduct »» Health, Safety and Environment Strategy

8. Student services fee In response to changes in student association legislation effective from the beginning of 2012, many institutions introduced or updated the way they charged students for services. This was to ensure that students still had access to essential services even if no longer covered by a student association fee. Anticipating this approach, new rules were put in place (via the 'Ministerial Direction on Compulsory Student Services Fees for 2012'). These allowed for a Student Services Fee or Levy to be charged for some types of services. One of the requirements was to account separately for these fees and report a description of the services funded out of the compulsory student services fee and a statement of the fee income and expenditure for each type of student service in the institution’s annual report.

»» Health and Safety Policy »» Wellness and Work Policy »» Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy »» Countering Harassment Policy »» Recruitment, Selection and Appointments Policy »» Staff Induction Policy »» Performance and Development Management Policy »» Leave Management Policy »» Senior Academic Appointments and Promotions Policy »» Academic Workload Policy »» Academic Staff Salary Progression Policy »» Academic Staff Development Policy »» Performance Recognition for Allied Staff Policy »» Regrading of Allied Staff Positions Policy »» Smokefree/Auahi Kore Policy »» Appointment of Adjunct Professors and Research Fellows Policy »» Mentoring Programme Procedures »» Tuition Fees Policy »» Staff Surplus Policy »» Staff Leaving Employment Policy »» Staff Disciplinary Policy »» Privacy Policy »» Staff Hardship Fund Policy »» Outside Work Policy

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Governance Report

73


Key staff statistics 2012*

Compulsory student services fees income and expenditure for 2012 Name

Actual ($000)

Student services fees income Advocacy and Legal Advice

The ethnic mix of our staff

5.19%

Advocating on behalf of individual students and groups of students, and providing independent support to resolve problems

459

Careers Information, Advice and Guidance

Supporting students’ transition into post-study employment

360

Counselling Services and Pastoral Care

Providing non-academic counselling and pastoral care, such as chaplains

Employment Information

Providing information about employment opportunities for students while they are studying

77

Financial Support and Advice

Providing hardship assistance and advice to students on financial issues

47

Health Services

Providing health care and related welfare services

215

Media

Supporting the production and dissemination of information by students to students, including newspapers, radio, television and internet-based media

295

95

Clubs and Societies

Supporting student clubs and societies, including through the provision of administrative support and facilities for clubs and societies

470

70

Total expenditure

3,537

Net cost to Unitec

(1,185)

5.06%

8.45%

49.41%

Age band

74

British/Irish

Māori

Chinese

NZ/European/Pakeha

Fijian

Other

Indian

Pacific

All staff

Academic staff

20 – 29

62

15

30 – 39

226

87

40 – 49

328

173

50 – 59

352

202

60 – 69

203

129

70 – 79

17

13

1,188

619

Total

*The key staff statistics data excludes hourly paid staff.

6.14%

1,449

Providing affordable childcare services while parents are studying

Providing sports, recreation and cultural activities for students

16.91%

2.40%

Childcare Services

Sports, Recreation and Cultural Activities

6.44%

2,352


Our staff mix by gender

Occupational group Academic Full-time Part-time

455

164

44.19%

1,188

100%

Employees, including management, receiving salaries in excess of $100,000 (FTE) per annum are as follows:

Management

Occupational group

55.81%

525

Salaries over $100,000 (FTE) per annum

352

93

Full-time Part-time 8

663

Male Total

Allied Full-time Part-time

Female

116

Bands

Management

Academic

Other staff

2012 Total

2011 Total

100,000 – 110,000

10

13

4

27

25

110,001 – 120,000

8

13

21

18

120,001 – 130,000

8

9

17

20

4

Full-time

Part-time

Academic

455

164

130,001 – 140,000

5

9

3

Allied

352

93

140,001 – 150,000

2

2

4

Management

116

8

150,001 – 160,000

2

2

1

923

265

160,001 – 170,000

1

1

Total

Our staff mix by gender 44.19%

170,001 – 180,000

1

1

2

180,001 – 190,000

2

2

3

190,001 – 200,000

6

6

2

310,000 – 320,000 320,000 – 330,000 Totals over

1 1 46

1 39

4

89

79

$100,000

55.81% Male

Female

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» Governance Report

75


76


Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2012


Statement of responsibility For the year ended 31 December 2012 The Council and management are responsible for the preparation of the Unitec Institute of Technology and group’s financial statements and statement of service performance, and for the judgements made in them. The Council and management of the Unitec Institute of Technology have the responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting. The Council and management have the responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control for non-financial information. In the Council and management’s opinion, these financial statements and statement of service performance fairly reflect the financial position and operations of the Unitec Institute of Technology and group for the year ended 31 December 2012.

Signed by:

E van Arkel Chairman

Dr R Ede Chief Executive

P Conder Chief Financial Officer

6 March 2013

78


Independent auditor’s report

Basis of opinion

To the readers of Unitec Institute of Technology and group’s financial statements and non-financial performance information for the year ended 31 December 2012

We carried out our audit in accordance with the Auditor‑General’s Auditing Standards, which incorporate the International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and carry out our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and non-financial performance information are free from material misstatement.

The Auditor‑General is the auditor of Unitec Institute of Technology (the Institute) and group. The Auditor‑General has appointed me, David Walker, using the staff and resources of Audit New Zealand, to carry out the audit of the financial statements and non-financial performance information of the Institute and group on her behalf.

We have audited:

Material misstatements are differences or omissions of amounts and disclosures that in our judgement, are likely to influence readers' overall understanding of the financial statements and non-financial performance information. If we had found material misstatements that were not corrected, we would have referred to them in our opinion.

Opinion

An audit involves carrying out procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and non-financial performance information. The procedures selected depend on our judgement, including our assessment of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and non-financial performance information, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Institute and group’s preparation of the financial statements and non-financial performance information that fairly reflect the matters to which they relate. We consider internal control in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Institute and group’s internal control.

In our opinion:

An audit also involves evaluating:

»» the financial statements of the Institute and group on pages 81 to 130:

»» the appropriateness of accounting policies used and whether they have been consistently applied;

»» the financial statements of the Institute and group on pages 81 to 130, that comprise the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2012, the statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cashflows for the year ended on that date and the notes to the financial statements that include accounting policies and other explanatory information; and »» the non-financial performance information of the Institute and group on pages 52 to 65.

»» comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and »» fairly reflect the Institute and group’s: • financial position as at 31 December 2012; and • financial performance and cash flows for the year ended on that date; »» the non-financial performance information of the Institute and group on pages 52 to 65 fairly reflects the Institute and group’s service performance achievements and outcomes measured against the performance targets adopted in the investment plan for the year ended 31 December 2012. Our audit was completed on 8 March 2013. This is the date at which our opinion is expressed. The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Council and our responsibilities, and we explain our independence.

»» the reasonableness of the significant accounting estimates and judgements made by the Council; »» the adequacy of all disclosures in the financial statements and nonfinancial performance information; and »» the overall presentation of the financial statements and non-financial performance information. We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements and non-financial performance information. Also we did not evaluate the security and controls over the electronic publication of the financial statements and non-financial performance information. We have obtained all the information and explanations we have required and we believe we have obtained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» financial statements

79


Responsibilities of the Council The Council is responsible for preparing financial statements that: »» comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and »» fairly reflect the Institute and group’s financial position, financial performance and cashflows. The Council is also responsible for preparing non-financial performance information that fairly reflects the Institute and group’s service performance achievements and outcomes. The Council is responsible for such internal control as it determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements and nonfinancial performance information that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The Council is also responsible for the publication of the financial statements and non-financial performance information, whether in printed or electronic form. The Council’s responsibilities arise from the Education Act 1989 and the Crown Entities Act 2004.

Responsibilities of the Auditor We are responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements and non-financial performance information and reporting that opinion to you based on our audit. Our responsibility arises from section 15 of the Public Audit Act 2001 and the Crown Entities Act 2004

Independence When carrying out the audit, we followed the independence requirements of the Auditor‑General, which incorporate the independence requirements of the External Reporting Board. In addition to the annual audit we have carried out an assignment for the provision of assurance on the Performance-Based Research Fund External Research Income. This assignment is compatible with those independence requirements.

David Walker Audit New Zealand On behalf of the Auditor‑General Auckland, New Zealand

80

Matters relating to the electronic presentation of the audited financial statements and performance information. This audit report relates to the financial statements and performance information of Unitec Institute of Technology and group for the year ended 31 December 2012 included on Unitec Institute of Technology and group’s website. The Unitec Institute of Technology and group’s Council is responsible for the maintenance and integrity of Unitec Institute of Technology and group’s website. We have not been engaged to report on the integrity of Unitec Institute of Technology and group’s website. We accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements and performance information since they were initially presented on the website. The audit report refers only to the financial statements and performance information named above. It does not provide an opinion on any other information which may have been hyperlinked to or from the financial statements and performance information. If readers of this report are concerned with the inherent risks arising from electronic data communication they should refer to the published hard copy of the audited financial statements and performance information as well as the related audit report dated 8 March 2013 to confirm the information included in the audited financial statements and performance information presented on this website. Legislation in New Zealand governing the preparation and dissemination of financial information may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.


Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 December 2012 Note

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Budget

Actual

Actual

Budget

2012

2012

2011

2012

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Income Government grants

3(a)

80,982

80,707

78,849

80,982

80,707

78,849

Student tuition fees

3(b)

55,832

56,554

53,608

55,832

56,554

53,608

Student services fees

3(e)

2,352

2,479

972

2,352

2,479

972

Trading income

4(a)

4,979

2,886

4,227

3,856

1,735

3,126

Interest income

3(c)

464

305

395

458

300

391

Other income

3(d)

7,365

7,620

5,681

9,053

7,649

5,712

151,974

150,551

143,732

152,533

149,424

142,658

5(a)

92,434

89,494

86,824

91,454

88,512

85,874

4(b), 5(b), 10, 11

13,450

12,760

12,277

13,386

12,682

12,193

3,154

3,714

3,256

3,154

3,714

3,256 3,491

Total income Expenditure Personnel costs Depreciation and amortisation Class materials Trading expenditure

4(b)

4,284

2,173

3,576

4,207

2,091

Finance costs

5(c)

323

401

171

318

397

161

Administration costs and other expenses

5(d)

34,430

36,709

32,903

34,493

36,778

33,053

148,075

145,251

139,007

147,012

144,174

138,027

3,899

5,300

4,725

5,521

5,250

4,631

0

0

900

0

0

678

0

0

900

0

0

678

3,899

5,300

5,625

5,521

5,250

5,309

Total expenditure Surplus/(deficit) Other comprehensive income Item that will not be reclassified to surplus (deficit) Property revaluations

16

Total other comprehensive income/(expense) Total comprehensive income/(expense)

Explanations of major variances against budget are provided in note 25. The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť financial statements

81


Statement of Financial Position for the year ended 31 December 2012 Note

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Budget

Actual

Actual

Budget

2012

2012

2011

2012

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents

6

2,821

1,511

3,927

2,546

1,105

3,423

Trade and other receivables

7

3,155

3,575

3,857

3,053

3,477

3,757

Inventories

8

637

669

969

637

669

969

644

306

582

644

306

582

7,256

6,060

9,334

6,880

5,557

8,732

Prepayments Total current assets Non-current assets Investment Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets

9

278

0

0

278

0

0

10

215,346

226,506

213,384

215,340

225,168

211,746 10,723

11

9,343

9,342

10,723

9,343

9,342

10(a)

4,328

2,086

3,521

4,328

2,086

3,521

Total non-current assets

229,293

237,934

227,627

229,287

236,596

225,989

Total assets

236,549

243,994

236,962

236,167

242,153

234,721

Capital work in progress

Liabilities Current liabilities Trade and other payables

12

10,606

10,194

10,664

10,534

10,108

10,580

Revenue received in advance

13

7,909

7,528

6,584

7,909

7,528

6,584

Borrowings

14

1,937

10,525

8,828

1,937

10,525

8,741

Employee entitlements

15

8,062

6,882

7,225

8,010

6,832

7,171

28,514

35,129

33,301

28,391

34,993

33,077 1,430

Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Borrowings

14

1,865

1,775

1,565

1,865

1,775

Employee entitlements

15

1,042

865

865

1,042

865

865

2,907

2,640

2,430

2,907

2,640

2,295

31,421

37,768

35,731

31,298

37,633

35,372

205,128

206,225

201,230

204,870

204,520

199,349

Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity General funds

16

100,288

98,543

94,773

100,251

97,283

93,114

Property revaluation reserves

16

104,840

107,683

106,456

104,618

107,237

106,234

205,128

206,225

201,230

204,870

204,520

199,349

Total equity

Explanations of major variances against budget are provided in note 25. The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

82


Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 December 2012 Note

Balance at 1 January

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Budget

Actual

Actual

Budget

2012

2012

2011

2012

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

201,230

200,925

195,605

199,349

199,270

194,040

3,899

5,300

4,725

5,521

5,250

4,631

900

0

Comprehensive income Surplus/(deficit) Other comprehensive income

0

Total comprehensive income Balance at 31 December

16

678

3,899

5,300

5,625

5,521

5,250

5,309

205,128

206,225

201,230

204,870

204,520

199,349

Explanations of major variances against budget are provided in note 25. The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť financial statements

83


Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 31 December 2012 Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Budget

Actual

Actual

Budget

2012

2012

2011

2012

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Cash flows from operating activities Cash was provided from: Government grants

81,922

83,576

79,311

81,922

83,576

79,311

Tuition fees

65,789

59,859

61,504

65,789

59,859

61,504

Interest received Other operating receipts

456

430

394

449

425

389

13,709

21,461

12,352

12,604

20,220

11,297

161,876

165,326

153,561

160,764

164,079

152,502

Cash was applied to: Payment to employees

84,404

84,798

79,403

83,391

83,800

78,495

Goods and services tax (net)

977

77

1,675

971

53

1,674

Interest paid

317

364

161

311

364

151

56,459

60,892

56,531

56,380

60,799

56,568

142,157

146,131

137,771

141,052

145,016

136,887

19,719

19,194

15,791

19,712

19,063

15,615

Payment to suppliers

Net cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Cash was provided from: Sale of property, plant and equipment

413

0

131

413

0

131

413

0

131

413

0

131

11,353

20,000

7,694

11,339

20,000

7,694

444

447

10,552

444

447

10,552

11,797

20,447

18,247

11,783

20,447

18,247

-11,384

-20,447

-18,116

-11,370

-20,447

-18,116

Cash was applied to: Purchase of property, plant and equipment Purchase of intangible assets

Net cash flow from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Cash was provided from: Loan raised

6,000

8,500

9,500

6,000

8,500

9,500

6,000

8,500

9,500

6,000

8,500

9,500

Cash was applied to: Repayment of loan liabilities Repayment of finance lease liabilities

84

13,222

7,218

3,583

13,000

7,000

3,500

2,219

1,859

2,064

2,219

1,859

2,064

15,441

9,077

5,647

15,219

8,859

5,564


Net cash flow from financing activities

-9,441

-577

3,853

-9,219

-359

3,936

Total net cash flows

-1,106

-1,830

1,528

-878

-1,744

1,435

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January

3,927

3,341

2,399

3,423

2,848

1,988

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

2,821

1,511

3,927

2,546

1,105

3,423

2,821

1,511

2,410

2,546

1,105

1,906

0

0

1,518

0

0

1,518

2,821

1,511

3,927

2,546

1,105

3,423

Closing cash and cash equivalents Cash and bank Short-term investments Closing cash and cash equivalents at 31 December

The goods and services tax (GST) (net) component of operating activities reflects the net GST paid and received with Inland Revenue. The GST (net) component has been presented on a net basis, as the gross amounts do not provide meaningful information for financial statement purposes. The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť financial statements

85


Statement of Cash Flows (continued) for the year ended 31 December 2012 Reconciliation of net surplus/(deficit) to the net cash flows from operating activities

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Budget

Actual

Actual

Budget

2012

2012

2011

2012

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

3,899

5,300

4,725

5,521

5,250

4,631

13,457

12,764

12,283

13,393

12,686

12,198

26

51

181

18

51

178

0

0

0

-1,574

0

0

-566

0

0

-566

0

0

177

120

-14

177

120

-14

13,094

12,934

12,449

11,448

12,857

12,362

(Gain)/loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

-350

0

103

-350

0

103

Total items classified as investing and financing items

-350

0

103

-350

0

103

(Increase)/decrease in inventories

332

300

-320

332

300

-320

(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables

702

282

-416

704

279

-400 -285

Surplus/(deficit) from the statement of comprehensive income

Actual

Add/(less) non-cash items: Depreciation/amortisation Bad debts Less non-cash donation Less non-cash gain on sales Increase/(decrease) in non-current employee entitlement Total non-cash items Add/(less) items classified as investing and financing items:

Add/(less) movements in working capital items:

(Increase)/decrease in prepayments

-61

276

-285

-61

276

Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables

-58

-498

-389

-46

-504

-385

1,325

944

-1,105

1,325

944

-1,105

837

-343

1,032

839

-340

1,017

3,077

961

-1,485

3,092

956

-1,480

19,719

19,194

15,791

19,712

19,063

15,615

Increase/(decrease) in revenue received in advance Increase/(decrease) in current employee entitlements Net movements in working capital items Net cash flows from operating activities

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

86


Notes to the Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2012 1. Statement of accounting policies Reporting Entity Unitec Institute of Technology (Unitec) is a Crown entity established and governed by the Crown Entities Act 2004 and the Education Act 1989. The Institute and group consists of Unitec Institute of Technology and its subsidiaries, Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust, Unitec Recreation Trust and Unitec Trust. The Unitec Recreation Trust is to be disestablished in early 2013. Unitec has 50% interest in two joint ventures. They are Tepū Limited and film production joint venture ‘Stars In Her Eyes’ and both were established in 2012. All subsidiaries and joint ventures are incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand. The primary objective of the Institute and group is to provide tertiary education services for the benefit of the community rather than making a financial return. Accordingly, the Institute has designated itself and the group as public benefit entities for the purposes of New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS). The financial statements of the Institute and group are for the year ended 31 December 2012. The financial statements were authorised for issue by the Council on 6 March 2013.

Basis of Preparation Statement of compliance The financial statements of the Institute and group have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Crown Entities Act 2004 and the Education Act 1989, which includes the requirement to comply with New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice (NZ GAAP). These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with NZ GAAP as appropriate for public benefit entities. They comply with NZ IFRS.

Measurement base The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except where modified by the revaluation of land, buildings and certain financial instruments to fair value. Unitec does not hold derivative instruments.

Functional and presentation currency The financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($000). The functional currency of the Institute and its subsidiaries is New Zealand dollars (NZ$).

Changes in accounting policies There have been no changes in accounting policies during the financial year. The Institute has adopted the following revisions to accounting standards during the financial year, which have had only a presentational or disclosure effect: »» F RS-44 New Zealand Additional Disclosures and Amendments to NZ IFRS to harmonise with IFRS and Australian Accounting Standards (Harmonisation Amendments) – The purpose of the new standard and amendments is to harmonise Australian and New Zealand accounting standards with source IFRS and to eliminate many of the differences between the accounting standards in each jurisdiction. The main effect of the amendments on the Institute is that donations are no longer required to be separately disclosed and certain information about property valuations is no longer required to be disclosed. Notes 5(d) and 10 have been updated for these changes.

Adoption of the revised NZ IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures The revised NZ IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures (revised 2009) has been adopted since 2011. The effect of adopting the revised NZ IAS 24 is: »» m ore information is required to be disclosed about transactions between the Institute and government-related entities; and »» commitments with related parties now require disclosure.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements

87


Significant accounting policies Standards, amendments and interpretations issued that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted Standards, amendments, and interpretations issued but not yet effective that have not been early adopted, and are relevant to the Institute and group, are: NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments will eventually replace NZ IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. NZ IAS 39 is being replaced through the following three main phases: Phase 1 Classification and Measurement, Phase 2 Impairment Methodology and Phase 3 Hedge Accounting. Phase 1 has been completed and has been published in the new financial instrument standard NZ IFRS 9. NZ IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair value, replacing the many different rules in NZ IAS 39. The approach in NZ IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial assets (its business model) and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The financial liability requirements are the same as those of NZ IAS 39, except for when an entity elects to designate a financial liability at fair value through the surplus or deficit. The new standard is required to be adopted for the year ended 30 June 2016. However, as a new Accounting Standards Framework will apply before this date, there is no certainty when an equivalent standard to NZ IFRS 9 will be applied by public benefit entities. The Minister of Commerce has approved a new Accounting Standards Framework (incorporating a Tier Strategy) developed by the External Reporting Board (XRB). Under this Accounting Standards Framework, the Institute is classified as a Tier 1 reporting entity and it will be required to apply full public sector Public Benefit Entity Accounting Standards (PAS). These standards are being developed by the XRB and are mainly based on current International Public Sector Accounting Standards. The effective date for the new standards for public sector entities is expected to be for reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014. This means the Institute expects to transition to the new standards in preparing its 31 December 2015 financial statements. As the PAS are still under development, the Institute is unable to assess the implications of the new Accounting Standards Framework at this time. Due to the change in the Accounting Standards Framework for public benefit entities, it is expected that all new NZ IFRS and amendments to existing NZ IFRS will not be applicable to public benefit entities. Therefore, the XRB has effectively frozen the financial reporting requirements for public benefit entities up until the new Accounting Standard Framework is effective. Accordingly, no disclosure has been made about new or amended NZ IFRS that exclude public benefit entities from their scope. 88

Basis of consolidation The group financial statements are prepared by adding together like items of assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses, and cash flows on a lineby-line basis. All significant intragroup balances, transactions, income, and expenses are eliminated in full on consolidation.

Subsidiaries The Institute consolidates in the group financial statements all entities where the Institute has the capacity to control the financing and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from the activities of the entity. This power exists where the Institute controls the majority voting power on the governing body or where such policies have been irreversibly predetermined by the Institute or where the determination of such policies is unable to materially impact the level of potential ownership benefits that arise from the activities of the subsidiary. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases. Investments in subsidiaries are carried at cost in the Institute’s parent entity financial statements.

Joint venture A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. Unitec has a 50% interest in Tepū Limited, which is a joint venture with Rosebank Business Association and has a 50% joint venture interest in the film production of the film ‘Stars In Her Eyes’ with Stars in Her Eyes Limited, which is owned by Ample Films Limited. The Institute’s joint venture investment is accounted for in the group financial statements using the equity method.

Revenue Revenue is measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable. Government grants Government grants are recognised as revenue upon entitlement.


Student tuition fees

Consequently, all borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.

Student tuition fees are recognised as revenue on a course percentage of completion basis. The percentage of completion is measured by reference to the days of the course completed as a proportion of the total course days.

Leases

Research income

Finance leases

Funding received for research that will provide reciprocal benefits to the research funding provider is recognised as revenue on a percentage completion basis. The percentage of completion is measured by reference to the research expenditure incurred as a proportion to total expenditure expected to be incurred.

A finance lease is a lease that transfers to the lessee substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an asset, whether or not title is eventually transferred.

Funding received that provides no reciprocal benefit to the research funding provider is recognised as revenue when the funding is received. Donations Donations are recognised as income when the right to receive the fund or asset has been established. Sale of materials Sale of materials is recognised as revenue when the significant risk and rewards of ownership have passed to the buyer and can be measured reliably. Interest and dividends Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method. Dividends are recognised when the right to receive payment has been established. Other revenue Other revenue is recognised on an accrual basis. Revenue from the rendering of services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at balance date, based on the actual service provided as a percentage of the total services to be provided. Where a physical asset is acquired for nil or nominal consideration the fair value of the asset received is recognised as revenue. Assets vested in Unitec are recognised as revenue when control over the asset is obtained.

Borrowing costs The Institute and group have elected to defer the adoption of the revised NZ IAS 23 Borrowing Costs (Revised 2007) in accordance with the transitional provisions of NZ IAS 23 that are applicable to public benefit entities.

At the commencement of the lease term, finance leases are recognised as assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position at the lower of the fair value of the leased item or the present value of the minimum lease payments. The finance charge is charged to the surplus or deficit over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. The amount recognised as an asset is depreciated over its useful life. If there is no certainty as to whether the Institute and group will obtain ownership at the end of the lease term, the asset is fully depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and its useful life. Operating leases An operating lease is a lease that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an asset. Lease payments under an operating lease are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease incentives received are recognised in the surplus or deficit over the lease term as an integral part of the total lease expense.

Foreign currency translation The consolidated financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars, which is the functional and presentation currency for Unitec and its subsidiaries. Foreign currency transactions are converted to New Zealand dollars at the date of the transaction using the rate of exchange applicable on that day. Monetary assets and liabilities are denominated in functional currency only. Unitec does not hold during the year or at reporting date any assets or liabilities denominated in a foreign currency.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements

89


Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts.

Financial assets acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the shortterm or part of a portfolio classified as held for trading are classified as a current asset. After initial recognition, financial assets in this category are measured at their fair values with gains or losses on remeasurement recognised in the surplus or deficit.

Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the statement of financial position.

Loans and receivables (including cash and cash equivalents and debtors and other receivables)

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables Trade and other receivables represent student fee income and other receivables. Short-term debtors and other short-term receivables are recorded at their face value, less any provision for impairment. Receivables from related parties resulting from commercial dealings are made on commercial terms and conditions and are settled regularly.

Other financial assets Financial assets are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs unless they are carried at fair value through surplus or deficit in which case the transaction costs are recognised in the surplus or deficit. Purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on trade-date, the date on which the Institute and group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or have been transferred and the Institute and group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. Financial assets are classified into the following categories for the purposes of measurement: »» fair value through surplus or deficit; »» loans and receivables; and »» fair value through other comprehensive income. Classification of the financial asset depends on the purpose for which the instruments were acquired. Financial assets at fair value through surplus or deficit Financial assets at fair value through surplus or deficit include financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short-term or is part of a portfolio that is managed together and for which there is evidence of shortterm profit-taking.

90

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance date, which are included in non-current assets. Related party receivables that are repayable on demand are classified as a noncurrent asset because repayment of the receivable is not expected within 12 months of balance date. After initial recognition loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any provision for impairment. Gains and losses when the asset is impaired or derecognised are recognised in the surplus or deficit. Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income are those that are designated as fair value through other comprehensive income or are not classified in any of the other categories above. They are included in noncurrent assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance date. The Institute and group designates in this category: »» investments that it intends to hold long-term but which may be realised before maturity; and »» shareholdings that it holds for strategic purposes. After initial recognition these investments are measured at their fair value, with gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income except for impairment losses, which are recognised in the surplus or deficit. On derecognition the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified from equity to the surplus or deficit.

Impairment of financial assets At each balance date, the Institute and group assesses whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. Any impairment losses are recognised in the surplus or deficit.


Inventories Inventories held for distribution or consumption in the provision of services that are not supplied on a commercial basis are measured at cost (using the first-in first-out (FIFO) method), adjusted when applicable, for any loss of service potential. Where inventories are acquired at no cost or for nominal consideration, the cost is the current replacement cost at the date of acquisition. Inventories held for use in the production of goods and services on a commercial basis are valued at the lower of cost (using the FIFO method) and net realisable value. The amount of any write-down for the loss of service potential or from cost to net realisable value is recognised in the surplus or deficit in the period of the write-down.

Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment consists of the following asset classes: land, buildings, plant and equipment, furniture and fittings, motor vehicles, computer equipment, office equipment and library collection.

At the end of 2012, a desktop review of land and buildings was carried out by Telfer Young and the land and buildings values were not materially different from the 2011 full review and valuation. The full and desktop review exercises are componentised on a notional basis. Additions The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the Institute and group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The costs of day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognised in the surplus or deficit as they are incurred. Work in progress is recognised at cost less impairment and is not depreciated. In most instances, an item of property, plant and equipment is initially recognised at its cost. Where an asset is acquired at no cost, or for a nominal cost, it is recognised at fair value as at the date of acquisition. Disposals

Land is measured at fair value, and buildings and infrastructure are measured at fair value less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. All other asset classes are measured at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the disposal proceeds with the carrying amount of the asset. Gains and losses on disposals are reported net in the surplus or deficit. When revalued assets are sold amounts included in property revaluation reserves in respect of those assets are transferred to general funds.

Revaluation

Depreciation

Land, buildings and infrastructure are revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that their carrying amount does not differ materially from fair value and at least every three years.

Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis on all property, plant and equipment, other than land, at rates that will write off the cost (or valuation) of the assets to their estimated residual values over their useful lives.

The carrying values of revalued assets are assessed annually by independent valuers to ensure that they do not differ materially from fair value. If there is evidence supporting a material difference, then the off-cycle asset classes are revalued. Property, plant and equipment revaluation movements are accounted for on a class of asset basis. The net revaluation results are credited or debited to other comprehensive income and is accumulated to an asset revaluation reserve in equity for that class of asset. Where this would result in a debit balance in the asset revaluation reserve, this balance is not recognised in other comprehensive income but is recognised in the surplus or deficit. Any subsequent increase on revaluation that offsets a previous decrease in value recognised in the surplus or deficit will be recognised first in the surplus or deficit up to the amount previously expensed, and then recognised in other comprehensive income. UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements

91


The useful lives and associated depreciation rates of major classes of assets have been estimated as follows: Building Structure

10–78.13 years

1.28–10% Straight line

Fitout

4–62.89 years

1.59–25% Straight line

Services

4–54.05 years

1.85–25% Straight line

Network equipment

4–10 years

10–25% Straight line

Other computer equipment

3–10 years

10–33.33% Straight line

Plant and equipment

3–20 years

5–33.33% Straight line

10 years

10% Straight line

5 years

20% Straight line

10 years

10% Straight line

Computer equipment

Furniture and fittings Motor vehicles Office equipment Library collections – books – periodicals

8.5–10 years 10–11.76% Straight line 5 years

20% Straight line

The residual value and useful life of an asset is reviewed, and adjusted if applicable, at each financial year end.

Intangible assets Computer software acquisition and development. Acquired computer software licenses are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software at the date of acquisition. Costs that are directly associated with the development of software for internal use are recognised as an intangible asset. Direct costs include the software development employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads. Staff training costs are recognised as an expense when incurred. Costs associated with maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense when incurred. Course development costs Costs incurred on development of new courses are recognised as expenditure in the period in which they have been incurred as the level of expenditure is relatively constant from year to year.

92

Amortisation The carrying value of an intangible asset with a finite life is amortised on a straight-line basis over its useful life. Amortisation begins when the asset is available for use and ceases at the date that the asset is derecognised. The amortisation charge for each period is recognised in the surplus or deficit. The useful lives and associated amortisation rates of major classes of intangible assets have been estimated as follows: Computer software

3–10 years

10–33.33% Straight line

Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life, or not yet available for use, are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that have a finite useful life are reviewed for indicators of impairment at each balance date. When there is an indicator of impairment the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Value in use is depreciated replacement cost for an asset where the future economic benefits or service potential of the asset are not primarily dependent on the asset’s ability to generate net cash inflows and where the Institute and group would, if deprived of the asset, replace its remaining future economic benefits or service potential. The value in use for cash-generating assets is the present value of expected future cash flows. If an asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and the carrying amount is written-down to the recoverable amount. For revalued assets the impairment loss is recognised in other comprehensive income to the extent the impairment loss does not exceed the amount in the revaluation reserve in equity for that same class of asset. Where that results in a debit balance in the revaluation reserve, the balance is recognised in the surplus or deficit. For assets not carried at a revalued amount, the total impairment loss is recognised in the surplus or deficit. The reversal of an impairment loss on a revalued asset is credited to other comprehensive income and increases the asset revaluation reserve for that class of asset. However, to the extent that an impairment loss for that class of asset was previously recognised in the surplus or deficit, a reversal of the impairment loss is also recognised in the surplus or deficit.


For assets not carried at a revalued amount the reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in the surplus or deficit.

Investment property Unitec does not hold properties that could be classified as investment properties. Unitec assets are strategic and are held with the aim of being New Zealand’s leading provider of applied higher and further education.

Creditors and other payables Short-term creditors and other short-term payables are recorded at their face value.

Borrowings Borrowings are initially recognised at their fair value net of transaction costs incurred. After initial recognition, all borrowings are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Institute or group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance date.

Employee entitlements Short-term employee entitlements Employee benefits that are due to be settled within 12 months after the end of the period in which the employee renders the related service are measured at nominal values based on accrued entitlements at current rates of pay. These include salaries and wages accrued up to balance date, annual leave earned to but not yet taken at balance date, and sick leave. A liability for sick leave earned but not taken is recognised to the extent that absences in the coming year are expected to be greater than the sick leave entitlements earned in the coming year. The amount is calculated based on the unused sick leave entitlement that can be carried forward at balance date, to the extent it will be used by staff to cover those future absences. A liability and an expense is recognised for bonuses where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation.

Long-term employee entitlements Employee benefits that are due to be settled beyond 12 months after the end of period in which the employee renders the related service, such as long service leave and retirement gratuities, have been calculated on an actuarial basis. The calculations are based on: »» likely future entitlements accruing to staff, based on years of service, years to entitlement, the likelihood that staff will reach the point of entitlement and contractual entitlement information; and »» the present value of the estimated future cash flows. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields on government bonds at balance date with terms to maturity that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows for entitlements. The inflation factor is based on the expected long-term increase in remuneration for employees. Presentation of employee entitlements Sick leave, annual leave, vested long service leave and non-vested long service leave and retirement gratuities expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance date, are classified as a current liability. All other employee entitlements are classified as a non-current liability.

Superannuation schemes Employer contributions to Kiwisaver, the Government Superannuation Fund and other defined contribution superannuation schemes are accounted for as defined contribution schemes and are recognised as an expense in the surplus or deficit as incurred.

Provisions A provision is recognised for future expenditure of uncertain amount or timing when there is a present obligation (either legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that expenditures will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as an interest expense and is included in ‘finance costs’.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements

93


Equity Equity is measured as the difference between total assets and total liabilities. Equity is disaggregated on receipt and classified into the following components:

experience and other factors, including expectations or future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

»» capital contributions from Crown

The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.

»» quality reinvestment capital fund

Property revaluations

»» revaluation reserve of land

Note 10 provides information about the estimates and assumptions exercised in the measurement of revalued land and buildings.

»» revaluation reserve of building »» total comprehensive income

Goods and services tax All items in the financial statements are stated exclusive of GST, except for debtors and other receivables and creditors and other payables, which are presented on a GST-inclusive basis. Where GST is not recoverable as input tax then it is recognised as part of the related asset or expense. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, Inland Revenue is included as part of receivables or payables in the statement of financial position. The net GST paid to, or received from Inland Revenue, including the GST relating to investing and financing activities, is classified as a net operating cash flow in the statement of cash flows.

Critical judgements in applying accounting policies Management has exercised the following critical judgements in applying accounting policies for the year ended 31 December 2012. Crown-owned land and buildings Property in the legal name of the Crown that is occupied by the Institute and group is recognised as an asset in the statement of financial position. The Institute and group considers it has assumed all the normal risks and rewards of ownership of this property despite legal ownership not being transferred and, accordingly, it would be misleading to exclude these assets from the financial statements.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed exclusive of GST.

The Institute and group has secured the use of the property by means of a lease from the Ministry of Education for a period of 99 years from 1 December 1995 at nil rent.

Income tax

Government policy changes have established a process for transfer of this land and buildings to Unitec in the near future.

The Institute and group is exempt from income tax. Accordingly, no provision has been made for income tax.

Budget figures The budget figures are those approved by the Council at the start of the financial year. The budget figures have been prepared in accordance with NZ GAAP, using accounting policies that are consistent with those adopted by the Council in the preparation of the financial statements.

Critical accounting estimates and assumptions In preparing these financial statements, the Institute and group has made estimates and assumptions concerning the future. These estimates and assumptions may differ from the subsequent actual results. Estimates and assumptions are continually evaluated and are based on historical

94

Distinction between revenue and capital contributions Most Crown funding received is operational in nature and is provided by the Crown under the authority of an expense appropriation and is recognised as revenue. Where funding is received from the Crown under the authority of a capital appropriation, the Institute and group accounts for the funding as a capital contribution directly in equity. Information about capital contributions recognised in equity is disclosed in the statement of changes in equity and note 16.


2. Summary cost of services Parent Actual

Actual

2012

2011

$000

$000 48,010

Income Creative Industries and Business

52,529

Social and Health Sciences

49,654

51,143

Technology and Built Environment

39,793

37,315

141,976

136,468

Total income from services Other income

12,816

8,499

Internal sales eliminated

-2,259

-2,308

Other income

10,557

6,190

Total income

152,533

142,658

Expenditure Creative Industries and Business

25,880

24,398

Social and Health Sciences

28,274

29,039

Technology and Built Environment

19,995

17,153

Total cost of services

74,149

70,590

318

161 69,584

Finance costs Other costs

74,804

Internal purchases eliminated

-2,259

-2,308

Other costs

72,545

67,276

147,012

138,027

5,521

4,631

Total expenditure Surplus/(deficit)

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements

95


3. Income Consolidated

(a)

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

74,471

75,000

74,471

3,439

3,143

3,439

3,143

Youth Guarantee Fund

1,172

0

1,172

0

264

239

264

239

Refugee Study Grant

723

-14

723

-14

Other grants

383

1,010

383

1,010

80,982

78,849

80,982

78,849

34,089

33,309

34,089

33,309

21,743

20,299

21,743

20,299

55,832

53,608

55,832

53,608

Student tuition fees Domestic student tuition fees

Finance income Interest income

464

395

458

391

464

395

458

391

Other income Donations

11

33

1,661

3

341

288

341

288

2,072

2,097

2,072

2,097

100

115

100

115

1,597

1,273

1,597

1,273

Research

332

255

332

255

Gain on sale of property plant, and equipment

919

103

919

103

4,351

4,011

4,291

3,887

-2,358

-2,493

-2,259

-2,308

7,365

5,681

9,053

5,712

Contract education Copying Secondary Tertiary Alignment Resource Consultancy and project

Revenue from other operating activities Less internal sales

96

2012

75,000

International student tuition fees

(d)

Actual

Performance Based Research Fund (PBRF) MÄ ori and Pacifica Grant

(c)

Actual

Government grants Operational bulk grant (student achievement component funding)

(b)

Parent

Actual


(e) Student Services Fees income Consolidated

Student services fees income

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

2,352

972

2,352

972

2,352

972

2,352

972

Student services fees increased at the beginning of 2012 following changes to student union legislation, which led to a change in the provision of services to students.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements

97


4. Trading revenue and expenditure Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

1,199

640

1,199

640

720

715

720

715

1,937

1,771

1,937

1,771

(a) Revenue Building training projects Sport centre Student Village Trust income Total revenue

1,123

1,102

4,979

4,227

3,856

3,126

1,096

587

1,096

587

0

7

0

7

774

748

774

748

(b) Expenditure Trading materials Class materials Salaries and wages

8

5

8

5

1,957

1,730

1,957

1,730

General expenses

372

414

372

414

Trust expenditure

76

85

-

-

4,284

3,576

4,207

3,491

696

651

-351

-365

Depreciation Student Village

Total expenditure Surplus/(deficit) on trading activities

Student Village accommodation (change of accounting treatment) Unitec has, since the establishment of the Student Village in 2002, accounted for its Village operation as if it was acting as an agent for the individual apartment owners, however, upon review it was found that the treatment was incorrect and could lead to a misunderstanding of the contract relationships. There is a contract between Unitec and the individual apartment owners at an agreed rental (rental expense), which is a separate contract from that between Unitec and the individual apartment tenants (students) at a rental level set by Unitec, which is effectively the rental income. Any shortfall between the rentals is recognised as an additional cost to Unitec. In prior years, only the additional cost has been recorded in Unitec’s accounts. In 2012, student accommdation activities were included in the consolidated financial statements to correct the accounting treatment. The financial statements of 2011 were also corrected to provide appropriate comparable information.

98


Consolidated result (Unitec and subsidiaries) $000

Revised treatment

Original treatment

Actual 2012

Adjust 2011

Actual 2011

Trading income

4,979

4,227

2,572

Trading expenditure

4,284

3,576

1,874

Statement of Performance

This change has been made in a manner to comply with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the criteria for selecting and changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and corrections of errors. The Standard is intended to enhance the relevance and reliability of an entity’s financial statements, and the comparability of those financial statements over time and with the financial statements of other entities.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements

99


5. Expenditure Consolidated

Note (a)

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

82,789

Personnel costs 90,031

83,709

89,080

Employee benefit expenses

Salaries and wages 5(e)

684

761

684

761

Employee entitlement expenses

5(f)

1,719

2,353

1,690

2,324

92,434

86,824

91,454

85,874

Crown buildings

1,630

1,564

1,630

1,564

Institute buildings

4,918

5,018

4,918

5,018

626

584

626

584

10

0

10

0

Furniture and fittings

172

182

108

97

Motor vehicles

282

246

282

246

52

53

52

53

1,825

798

1,825

798

(b) Depreciation /amortisation

9, 11

Plant and quipment Leased plant and equipment

Office equipment Software Computer equipment Leased computer equipment Library collection Less depreciation in trading expenditure

912

869

912

869

2,414

2,349

2,414

2,349

616

621

616

621

13,457

12,283

13,393

12,198

8

5

8

5

13,450

12,277

13,386

12,193

(c) Finance cost Interest paid Finance lease interest

(d)

29

19

19

142

300

142

323

171

318

161

Administration costs and other expenses Annual report expenses Audit fees – paid to principal auditor including IFRS Audit fees – audit of external research income by the principal auditor Bad debts written off Change in provision for doubtful debts Councillors' fees Research Operating lease charges

100

24 300

5(g)

48

40

48

40

146

139

146

139

6

6

6

6

105

101

94

101

-80

80

-76

76

148

148

148

148

806

888

806

888

4,221

1,482

4,291

1,622


Consolidated

Note

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

4

0

4

0

Other administrative expenses

29,026

30,019

29,026

30,031

34,430

32,903

34,493

33,053

Superannuation contribution

192

192

192

192

Group Life Assurance

457

561

457

561

35

7

35

7

684

761

684

761

(e) Employee benefit expenses

Employee Assistance Programme

(f) Employee entitlement expenses Retirement leave

251

-234

251

-234

-180

297

-180

297

Sick leave

181

91

181

91

Holiday pay

344

902

344

902

Staff recruitment

221

487

221

487

Staff training and development

869

771

841

741

33

38

33

38

1,719

2,353

1,690

2,324

32

Long service leave

Other

(g) Councillors' fees The following fees were earned by members of Unitec Council during the year: E van Arkel ( Council Chair)

32

A Blackburn

16

16

D Harry

16

16

A Hudson

16

16

C O' Connor

16

16

R Reid

0

5

G Simpkin

0

5 20

K Turner

20

D Kidd

16

11

M Udale

16

11

148

148

Total

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements 101


6. Cash and cash equivalents Consolidated

Cash at bank and in hand Short-term deposits Bank overdraft Net cash position

parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

2,821

2,410

2,546

1,906

0

1,518

0

1,518

2,821

3,927

2,546

3,423

0

0

0

0

2,821

3,927

2,546

3,423

Bank facilities are disclosed within current liabilities in note 14. Cash at bank and in hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for varying periods of between one day and one month, depending on the immediate cash requirements of the group, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.

Reconciliation of cash for the purpose of the cash flow statement For the purpose of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise the following as at 31 December 2012: Consolidated

parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

2,821

2,410

2,546

1,906

0

1,518

0

1,518

2,821

3,927

2,546

3,423

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

Note

$000

$000

$000

$000

Student fees receivables

7(a)

2,397

1,651

2,397

1,651

Trade receivables

7(b)

904

2,430

796

2,322

6

6

6

6

7(c)

-151

-231

-146

-222

3,155

3,857

3,053

3,757

Cash at bank and in hand Short-term deposits

Actual

7. Trade and other receivables Consolidated

Parent Actual

Trade and other receivables

Accrued Interest Less: provision for impairment Total trade and other receivables

102


Fair value Student fees are due before a course commences or are due upon enrolment if the course has already begun. For courses that span more than one trimester, domestic students can arrange for fees to be paid in instalments. Student fee receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally paid in full by course commencement date. Therefore, their carrying value approximates their fair value. Other receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally settled on 30-day terms. Therefore, the carrying value of other receivables approximates their fair value. Impairment The aging profile of student fee and trade receivables at year end are detailed below: (a)

Student fee receivables 2012

Consolidated

Impairment

Net

Gross

Impairment

Net

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

1–30 days

884

884

291

291

31–60 days

128

128

201

201

61–90 days >90 days Total student fee receivables

69

101

1,316

69 146

1,170

1,058

146

912

2,397

146

2,251

1,651

146

1,505

Gross

Impairment

Net

Gross

Impairment

Net

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

2012

Parent

101

2011

1–30 days

884

884

291

291

31–60 days

128

128

201

201

61–90 days >90 days Total student fee receivables (b)

2011

Gross

69

101

1,316

69 146

1,170

1,058

146

912

101

2,397

146

2,251

1,651

146

1,505

Gross

Impairment

Net

Gross

Impairment

Net

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Trade receivables 2012

Consolidated

1–30 days

2011

673

673

1,684

1,684

31–60 days

9

9

18

18

61–90 days

0

0

9

>90 days Total trade receivables

9

221

82

140

719

86

634

904

82

822

2,430

86

2,345

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 103


2012

Parent

1–30 days

2011

Gross

Impairment

Net

Gross

Impairment

Net

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

647

647

1,661

1,661

31–60 days

9

9

18

18

61–90 days

0

0

9

9

>90 days

140

76

63

634

76

558

Total trade receivables

796

76

720

2,322

76

2,246

All receivables greater than 30 days in age are considered to be past due. Due to the large number of student fee receivables, the impairment assessment is performed on a collective basis, based on an analysis of past collection history and debt write-offs.

(c)

Movements in the provision for impairment are as follows: Student fee receivables

At 1 January Additional provisions made during the year At 31 December Trade receivables

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

146

146

146

146

0

0

0

0

146

146

146

146

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Consolidated

Actual

Parent Actual

At 1 January

86

6

76

0

Additional provisions made during the year

-4

80

0

76

At 31 December

82

86

76

76

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

8. Inventories Consolidated

Parent

Materials and consumables

124

115

124

115

Houses built for sale

513

854

513

854

Total materials and consumables

637

969

637

969

No inventories are pledged as security for liabilities (2011:$nil). However, some inventories are subject to retention of title clauses.

104

Actual


9. Investment Consolidated

Investments carried at cost – Polytechnics International NZ LTD (PINZ)

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

42

0

42

0

Film production 'Stars In Her Eyes'

235

0

235

0

Total Investment

278

0

278

0

Tepū Limited

33

0

33

0

Total shareholder's loan

33

0

33

0

Name of joint venture

Country of incorporation

Equity/interest (%)

Investment ($000)

2012

2011

2012

2011 0

Tepū Limited (established in 2012)

New Zealand

50

0

0

Film production 'Stars In Her Eyes' (established in 2012)

New Zealand

50

0

235

0

235

0

Unitec has a 50% interest of shares in Tepū Limited, which was established in 2012. Unitec has a 50% joint interest in the production of the film ‘Stars In Her Eyes’. Stars in Her Eyes Limited, which is owned by Ample Films Limited, the other party to this production. Unitec provided a loan funding of $32,500 to Tepū Limited in 2012. There was no income generated from these two joint ventures in the year of 2012. Unitec has no liabilities on the joint ventures. The carrying value of the current portion of investments approximates their fair value. There is no impairment provision for investments. Name of the subsidiaries

Country of incorporation

Equity/interest (%)

Investment ($000)

2012

2011

2012

2011

Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust

New Zealand

100

100

0

0

Unitec Recreation Trust (disestabished in early 2013)

New Zealand

100

100

0

0

Unitec Trust

New Zealand

100

100

0

0

NZ Institute of Technology Limited (dormant) (disestablished in early 2012)

New Zealand

0

100

0

0

Open Institute of Technology Limited (dormant) (disestablished in early 2012)

New Zealand

0

100

0

0

Unitec Limited (dormant) (disestablished in early 2012)

New Zealand

0

100

0

0

0

0

Unitec’s subsidiaries include Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust, Unitec Recreation Trust and Unitec Trust. The Unitec Recreation Trust is to be disestablished in early 2013.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 105


10. Property, plant and equipment

Land (Crown)

Land (Institute)

Building (Crown)

Building (Institute)

Plant and equipment

Plant and equipment (leased)

Furniture and fittings

Motor vehicles

Computer equipment

Computer equipment (leased)

Office equipment

Library collection

Total

Parent

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

22,618

51,670

29,637

104,076

7,536

(0)

2,835

2,008

7,404

6,712

912

5,583

9,429

807

0

202

509

811

1,271

43

631

Cost or valuation Balance at 1 January 2011 Additions Revaluation increase/decrease

(1,387)

(2,810)

515

(13,433)

223

193

251 (463)

(9)

21,231 49,083

30,345

99,861

8,176

30,345

99,861 9,148

Adjustment Disposals

Balance at 1 January 2012 Additions

21,231

49,083 3,567

(158)

(105)

30

(124)

(0)

2,933

2,088

8,091

7,879

956

6,214

236,855

8,176

(0)

2,933

2,088

8,091

7,879

956

6,214

236,855

950

438

443

534

875

2,757

49

622

19,385

(460)

310 (104)

(1,035)

Revaluation increase/decrease

Reclassification

(1)

Adjustment Disposals Balance at 31 December 2012

106

13,704 (17,114)

Reclassification

Balance at 31 December 2011

240,991

– (3,641) 21,231 49,009

30,345

109,009

(438)

(440) (8,705)

1

(25)

(478)

(34)

(4,526)

2,143

8,932

5,671

9,101

438

3,376

1 1,005

6,836

247,097


Total

Library collection

Office equipment

Computer equipment (leased)

Computer equipment

Motor vehicles

Furniture and fittings

Plant and equipment

Building (Institute)

Building (Crown)

Land (Institute)

Land (Crown)

Plant and equipment (leased)

Parent

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses Balance at 1 January 2011

Depreciation expense

3,120

8,405

4,392

1,564

5,018

584

(463)

(2)

(0)

2,383

1,320

5,516

3,377

565

3,004

32,081

97

246

869

2,349

53

621

11,400

Reclassification

Eliminate on disposal Eliminate on revaluation Adjustment

(4,693)

(12,862)

8

54

(4)

(0)

151

4,970

(0)

151

1,630

4,918

(416)

(880) (17,555)

(19)

26

(1)

63

(0)

2,461

1,175

6,384

5,726

617

3,625

4,970

(0)

2,461

1,175

6,384

5,726

617

3,625

25,110

626

10

108

282

912

2,414

52

616

11,568

(399)

(34)

(4,526)

(4,984)

63

Impairment losses

Balance at 31 December 2011

Balance at 1 January 2012

Depreciation expense

25,110

Reclassification

Eliminate on disposal

(25)

Eliminate on revaluation

Adjustment

63

Impairment losses Balance at 31 December 2012

– –

1,630

5,133

5,571

10

2,569

1,058

7,262

3,614

669

4,241

31,757

208,910

Carrying amounts At 1 January 2011

22,618

51,670

26,517

95,672

3,144

452

688

1,887

3,335

348

2,579

At 31 December 2011 and 1 January 2012

21,231

49,083

30,345

99,710

3,206

0

472

912

1,707

2,152

338

2,589

211,746

28,715 103,876

3,530

428

807

1,085

1,670

2,057

336

2,595

215,340

At 31 December 2012

21,231 49,009

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 107


Land (Crown)

Land (Institute)

Building (Crown)

Building (Institute)

Plant and equipment

Plant and equipment (leased)

Furniture and fittings

Motor vehicles

Computer equipment

Computer equipment (leased)

Office equipment

Library collection

Total

Consolidated

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Cost or valuation Balance at 1 January 2011 Additions Revaluation increase/decrease

22,618

51,670

29,637

105,738

7,536

(0)

2,838

2,008

7,418

6,712

913

5,583

9,429

807

0

202

509

811

1,271

43

631

242,671 13,704

(1,387)

(2,810)

515

(13,458)

(17,140)

Reclassification

Adjustment

223

193

251

(158)

(105)

30

(124)

309

(463)

(9)

(460)

(104)

(1,035)

Balance at 31 December 2011

Disposals

21,231

49,083

30,345

101,498

8,176

(0)

2,936

2,088

8,105

7,879

957

6,214

238,509

Balance at 1 January 2012

21,231

49,083

30,345

101,498

8,176

(0)

2,936

2,088

8,105

7,879

957

6,214

238,509

Additions

3,567

7,511

957

438

443

534

875

2,757

49

622

17,755

Revaluation increase/decrease

Reclassification

(1)

(438)

(440)

Adjustment

1

(0)

1

Disposals

(3,641)

(25)

(478)

(34)

(4,526)

(8,705)

30,345 109,009

9,108

438

3,379

2,143

8,946

5,671

1,006

6,836

247,121

Balance at 31 December 2012

108

21,231 49,009


Total

Library collection

Office equipment

Computer equipment (leased)

Computer equipment

Motor vehicles

Furniture and fittings

Plant and equipment

Building (Institute)

Building (Crown)

Land (Institute)

Land (Crown)

Plant and equipment (leased)

Consolidated

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses Balance at 1 January 2011

3,120

8,566

4,392

(0)

2,384

1,320

5,529

3,377

566

3,004

32,257

Depreciation expense

1,564

5,102

584

98

246

869

2,349

53

621

11,486

Reclassification

Eliminate on disposal

(463)

(2)

(416)

(880)

Eliminate on revaluation

(4,693)

(13,107)

(17,800)

Adjustment

8

54

(4)

(19)

26

(1)

63

Impairment losses

Balance at 31 December 2011

(0)

151

4,970

(0)

2,463

1,175

6,397

5,726

619

3,625

25,126

Balance at 1 January 2012

(0)

151

4,970

(0)

2,463

1,175

6,397

5,726

619

3,625

25,126

Depreciation expense

1,630

4,918

626

11

108

282

912

2,414

52

616

11,570

Reclassification

Eliminate on disposal

(25)

(399)

(34)

(4,526)

(4,984)

Eliminate on revaluation

Adjustment

63

63

Impairment losses

Balance at 31 December 2012

1,630

5,133

5,572

11

2,571

1,058

7,275

3,614

670

4,241

31,775

At 1 January 2011

22,618

51,670

26,517

97,173

3,144

454

688

1,888

3,335

348

2,579

210,414

At 31 December 2011 and 1 January 2012

21,231

49,083

30,345

101,346

3,206

0

472

912

1,707

2,152

338

2,589

213,384

28,715 103,876

3,537

427

808

1,085

1,671

2,057

336

2,595

215,346

Carrying amounts

At 31 December 2012

21,231 49,009

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 109


Legal ownership of land and buildings Legal ownership of land and buildings is detailed as follows: Land

Institute owned Crown owned Total

Buildings

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

49,009

49,083

103,876

101,346

21,231

21,231

28,715

30,345

70,241

70,314

132,590

131,691

Valuation At the end of 2012, a desktop review of land and buildings has been carried out by Telfer Young and the land and buildings values are not materially different from the 2011 full review and valuation. Land and buildings Land and buildings are measured at fair value less accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses. All buildings, whether owned by the Ministry of Education or purchased or built out of Unitec reserves since 1991, have been valued using the Optimised Depreciated Replacement Cost (ODRC) methodology by Evan Gamby of Telfer Young according to the requirements of NZ IAS 160 (IFRS 3). Crown-owned land and buildings are included as part of Unitec’s property, plant and equipment. These were first recognised on 1 January 1995 and, although legal title has not been transferred, Unitec has assumed all the normal risks and rewards of ownership. Subsequent to initial recognition as assets, land and buildings revaluations are made to ensure that the carrying amount of these classes of assets does not differ materially from their fair value at the reporting date. Following initial recognition at cost, land and buildings are carried at a revalued amount, which is the fair value at the date of the revaluation less any subsequent accumulated depreciation on buildings and accumulated impairment losses. Land and buildings are revalued and impairment tested annually. It has been determined that all of the building assets at Mt Albert campus are specialised. The teaching block at Waitakere campus, 800/3650 residual share of the library and 197/308 share of the car park on a strata title basis are specialised. The remaining assets at Waitakere are not specialised and have been valued on an open market basis, being 10 Trading Place and the four strata floors at 7 Ratanui Street. A number of factors have been considered in determining the specialised nature of the assets at Mt Albert and Waitakere. A decision has been made that there are no minor properties to be valued on an open market basis other than those referred to above. The following factors have been taken into account in determining that the appropriate methodology is ODRC for Mt Albert and Waitakere: »» the availability of market-based evidence that enables the value of the asset to be reliably determined. »» evidence that there would be demand for the asset in its current use in the absence of the educational operations. »» the materiality of the particular asset in the context of the overall value of the assets. »» whether the property is part of a campus, or a single building, or a group of buildings with a single use, on a separate title. »» the configuration and floor layout of the building. Risks associated with earthquakes The earthquakes experienced by Christchurch since September 2010, and particularly the tragic experiences of 22 February 2011, have highlighted the potential risks from an earthquake on various types of buildings.

110


Unitec owns and operates buildings at Mt Albert, Waitakere and Albany of various ages and construction methods. All buildings met earthquake standards when constructed. Auckland Council is currently carrying out an assessment of earthquake risks for buildings across the city and will include findings from the current Christchurch earthquake enquiry. Auckland Council may also update its standards in relation to buildings owned or operated by Unitec. Until new standards, if any, are known it is not possible to assess whether additional strengthening of buildings or impairment of their value is required. Initial Auckland Council assessments indicate Building 1, 6, 48, 76 and part of Building 28 at Mt Albert may be considered “potentially earthquake prone” buildings in accordance with Auckland Council’s policy. As a result, they require additional strengthening or impairment. The valuation of these buildings is $9,440,171 as valued by Telfer Young at 31 December 2011.

Restrictions on title Under the Education Act 1989, the Institute and group is required to obtain consent from the Ministry of Education to dispose or sell of property where the value of the property exceeds an amount determined by the Minister. There are also various restrictions in the form of historic designations, reserve and endowment encumbrances attached to land. The Institute and group does not consider it practical to disclose in detail the value of land subject to these restrictions.

Land swap Land swap transactions with Ngāti Whātua o Orakei, which were initiated in 2001, have been finalised in 2012. Unitec received $241,507 for the difference in the value of the assets being swapped. In preparing transactions for the finalisation of the land swap in 2012, it has become evident that the land swap has not been correctly treated since first created in 2001. This resulted in a combination of errors. This matter has now been corrected via a prior period adjustment and correction of the revaluation transaction that occurred in 2011. Below is a brief summary of the timing and accounting transactions associated with this transaction over a number of years. The original land swap transaction was entered into in 2001 and an amount agreed between Unitec and Ngāti Whātua as to the difference in valuations for the land and buildings being swapped. No accounting entries were done at this time as the issue over transfer of titles was still to be completed. There were effectively two parts to the transaction, which are subsequently referred to as Land Swap 1 (2001) and Land Swap 2 (2012). In the period up to 2006 no accounting adjustment entries were made to land and buildings but notes were made in the annual reports that the land swap was still to be finalised. For operational purposes, the land and buildings involved in the swap were effectively transferred and Unitec was using the buildings associated with the land swap. In 2006, a full land and building revaluation was undertaken by our valuers, and included in this valuation were the buildings associated with both Land Swap 1 and Land Swap 2 and these were incorporated in the accounting records as part of the revaluation exercise. In subsequent valuations these buildings continued to be revalued. No adjustments to land areas and/or the valuations resulting from the land swap were included. Notes continued to be made in the annual reports that the land swap was still to be finalised. In 2012, settlement was finally reached on the transfer of the various land titles and Ngāti Whātua paid the sum as agreed. The realisation that these transactions had not been recorded correctly at the appropriate time was identified in the preparation of the 2012 Annual Report. To correct the situation the following entries were made as prior year adjustments: 1. reversal of Unitec Land and Buildings Revaluation Reserves prior to the disposal of land in 2012 2. corrected recording of the Revaluation Reserve for Land and Buildings for 2011 3. correctly recording the Land Swap 1 transactions including subsequent revaluations. The accounting adjustments for prior years have no impact on the 2012 financial performance.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 111


For the 2012 year the following entry was made: 1. Record the Land Swap 2 transactions A summary of impact by these entries and change of treatment is below: Consolidated result (Unitec and subsidiaries) $000

Revised treatment per 2012 Annual Report Actual 2012

Actual 2011

Actual 2010

Original treatment 2011 Annual Report Actual 2011

Actual 2010

Statement of Performance Gain on sale Surplus/(deficit)

807 3,899

Property revaluations

4,725

4,771

899

663

3,899

5,624

5,434

Opening balance

201,229

195,605

197,746

Surplus/ (deficit)

3,899

4,725

4,771

Total comprehensive income Statement Movements in Equity

Other comprehensive income Closing equity

899 205,128

663

201,229

195,605

203,180

197,746

Crown land (carrying value)

21,231

21,231

22,618

23,652

25,039

Unitec land (carrying value)

49,009

49,083

51,670

47,926

50,736

Crown buildings (carrying value)

28,715

30,345

26,517

30,345

26,517

Unitec buildings (carrying value)

103,876

101,346

97,173

101,986

97,827

General funds

100,288

94,773

90,049

95,280

90,509

Property revaluation reserves

104,840

106,456

105,556

107,900

107,237

Total equity

205,128

201,229

195,605

203,180

197,746

This change was made in a manner to comply with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the criteria for selecting and changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and corrections of errors. The Standard is intended to enhance the relevance and reliability of an entity’s financial statements, and the comparability of those financial statements over time and with the financial statements of other entities.

112


10(a). Capital work in progress The total amount of property, plant and equipment in the course of construction is $ 4,328,000 (2011 $3,521,000). Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

1,893

131

1,893

131

137

235

137

235

32

8

32

8

6

23

6

23

ESSG project labour cost

49

50

49

50

ESSG project operating

11

11

11

11

465

373

465

373

Work in progress related to land and buildings Construction contract Client items – mechanical services Client items – preliminary and general Client items-site works

Fees – architectural Fees – planning

19

57

19

57

Fees – structural engineering

35

44

35

44

Other projects Total capital work in progress

1,682

2,589

1,682

2,589

4,328

3,521

4,328

3,521

11. Intangible assets Consolidated

Parent

Computer software

Computer software

Actual

Actual

$000

$000

Cost of intangible assets Balance at 1 January 2011 Additions Disposals Balance at 31 December 2011 Balance at 1 January 2012

8,916

8,916

10,552

10,552

19,468

19,468

19,468

19,468

Additions

444

444

Disposals

(6,573)

(6,573)

Balance at 31 December 2012

13,340

13,340

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 113


Accumulated amortisation and Impairment losses Balance at 1 January 2011

7,947

7,947

798

798

Eliminate on disposal

Impairement losses

Balance at 31 December 2011

8,745

8,745

Balance at 1 January 2012

8,745

8,745

Amortisation expense

1,825

1,825

(6,573)

(6,573)

Amortisation expense

Eliminate on disposal Impairement losses Balance at 31 December 2012

3,998

3,998

Carrying amount At 1 January 2011

968

968

At 31 December 2011 and 1 January 2012

10,723

10,723

At 31 December 2012

9,343

9,343

There are no restrictions over the title of the Institute and group’s intangible assets nor are any intangible assets pledged as security for liabilities. For the year ended 31 December 2012, computer software is capitalised at cost. These intangible assets have been assessed as having finite lives and are amortised using the straight-line method. The additions to computer software represent intangible assets acquired separately. Unitec currently does not capitalise its course development costs. The amount expended towards such expenses in 2012 was $232,571 (2011: $309,952).

12. Trade and other payables Consolidated

Trade payables Other payables – accruals

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

526

646

482

592

10,080

10,018

10,053

9,989

10,606

10,664

10,534

10,580

Related party payables: Subsidiaries

Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-day terms. Interest payable on the short-term loan is paid on maturity. For terms and conditions relating to related parties refer to note 20.

114

10,606

10,664

10,534

10,580


13. Revenue received in advance Consolidated

Tuition fees and other revenue received in advance

Current portion Non-current portion

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

7,909

6,584

7,909

6,584

7,909

6,584

7,909

6,584

7,909

6,584

7,909

6,584

0

0

0

0

7,909

6,584

7,909

6,584

14. Borrowings Consolidated

Parent

Effective

Actual

Actual

Actual

interest

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

rate (%)

Maturity

Actual

Current Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts

1,937

1,741

1,937

1,741

Loan from ASB Bank

0

5,000

0

5,000

Loan from National Bank

0

2,000

0

2,000

Loan from National Bank

0

86

0

0

1,937

8,828

1,937

8,741

1,865

1,430

1,865

1,430

0

136

1,865

1,565

1,865

1,430

3,802

10,393

3,802

10,171

Non-current Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts Loan from National Bank

Total borrowings

Bank facilities Unitec has a revolving facility with ANZ National Bank at a fixed margin on the prevailing bank bill rate up to a maximum of $25 million as at 31 December 2012. Unitec had a revolving facility with the ASB Bank up to a maximum of $7 million which has expired at 31 December 2012. The Unitec Recreation Trust had a 20 year mortgage with the National Bank at an interest rate of 3.55%. The loan was secured on the Trust assets but this was repaid during 2012 as part of the planned disestablishment of the Trust.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements 115


Finance leases Finance leases have been entered into for computers and electronic equipment for teaching, research and administrative purposes. The finance leases can be renewed at the Institute and group’s option, with rents set by reference to current market rates for items of equivalent age and condition. The Institute and group does have the option to purchase the asset at the end of the lease term, but it is likely the option to purchase will not be exercised because the leased assets are usually technologically obsolete at lease expiry. The Institute and group is not permitted to pledge the leased assets as security nor can it sublease the leased equipment without the permission of the lessor. There are no other restrictions placed on the Institute and group by any of the finance leasing arrangements. Loans and finance leases Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Opening balance

10,393

5,269

10,171

4,964

Loan repayments

-13,222

-3,584

-13,000

-3,500

Finance lease repayments

-2,219

-2,064

-2,219

-2,064

Loan raised

6,000

9,500

6,000

9,500

Finance lease raised

2,850

1,271

2,850

1,271

Closing balance

3,802

10,393

3,802

10,171

1,937

1,741

1,937

1,741

0

7,086

0

7,000

1,937

8,828

1,937

8,741

1,865

1,430

1,865

1,430

0

0

0

0

0

136

0

0

Term portion 31 December

1,865

1,565

1,865

1,430

Closing balance 31 December

3,802

10,393

3,802

10,171

Analysis of loan and finance leases Current portion: Lease liabilities Other loan liabilities Current portion 31 December Term portion: Lease liabilities: two to five years Beyond five years Other term liabilities

116


Analysis of finance leases

Consolidation / Parent 2012

2011

2012

2011

Minimum payments

Minimum payments

Present value

Present value

of payments

of payments

$000

$000

$000

$000

Within one year

2,137

1,932

1,937

1,741

After one year but not more than five years

1,943

1,504

1,865

1,430

0

-277

-265

0

3,802

3,171

3,802

3,171

Later than five years Future finance charges Total minimum lease payments

15. Employee entitlements Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

8,090

7,073

8,037

7,034

1,014

1,017

1,015

1,003

At 31 December

9,104

8,090

9,052

8,037

Current portion

8,062

7,225

8,010

7,171

Non-current portion

1,042

865

1,042

865

9,104

8,090

9,052

8,037

Employee entitlements At 1 January Adjustments during the year

Comprising: Salaries and wages

1,175

722

1,175

722

Annual leave

6,517

6,174

6,465

6,120

Retirement leave

642

425

642

425

Long service leave

414

594

414

594

Sick leave

356

175

356

175

9,104

8,090

9,052

8,037

A provision is recognised for post-employment benefits payable to employees. Employees are entitled to annual leave pay, long service leave pay and retirement gratuities. Annual leave entitlements expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance sheet date are measured at the current rates of pay and classified as current liabilities. The actuarial calculations of sick leave have been classified as a current liability, as any current ailment is likely to occur from fresh accruals. Entitlements related to long service leave and retirement gratuities have been calculated at present value of future cash flows determined on an actuarial basis. The provision is affected by a number of assumptions including expected length of service, attrition rate and salary increase. There were three severance payments made in 2012: $18,000 (2011: $2,000). UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 117


16. Equity Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

94,773

90,049

93,114

88,483

General funds Balance at 1 January Property revaluation reserve transfer on disposal

1,616

Surplus/(deficit) for the year

1,616

3,899

4,725

5,521

4,631

Capital contributions from the Crown

0

0

0

0

Quality reinvestment capital fund

0

0

0

0

100,288

94,773

100,251

93,114

106,456

105,556

106,234

105,556

Balance at 31 December Property revaluation reserves Balance at 1 January Transfers to general funds on disposal of property

-1,616

-1,616

Revaluation gain/(loss) on land

0

-3,973

0

Revaluation gain/(loss) on buildings

0

4,873

0

-3,973 4,651

Balance at 31 December

104,840

106,456

104,618

106,234

Total equity at 31 December

205,128

201,230

204,870

199,349

Land

61,853

63,469

61,853

63,469

Buildings

42,987

42,987

42,765

42,765

104,840

106,456

104,618

106,234

Property revaluation reserves consist of:

Total property revaluation reserves

The asset revaluation reserve is used to record increments and decrements in the fair value of land and buildings to the extent that they offset one another. A desktop revaluation exercise of land and buildings has been carried out in 2012.

118


17. Capital commitments and operating leases Operating leases as lessee The group has entered into commercial leases on land and buildings as well as certain items of small machinery and office equipment where it is not in the best interest of the group to purchase these assets. There are no restrictions placed upon the lessee by entering into these leases. Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases of commercial land and buildings as at 31 December 2012 are as follows: Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Non-cancellable operating lease commitments Land and buildings Within one year

2,311

2,026

2,311

2,026

Later than one year and not later than two years

1,784

2,082

1,784

2,082

Later than two years and not later than five years

4,595

6,053

4,595

6,053

8,691

10,161

8,691

10,161

Operating leases as lessor The Institute has entered into commercial leases with tenants on land and buildings. These leases have a non-cancellable term of two to 20 years. The future aggregate minimum lease payments to be collected under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows: Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Non-cancellable operating lease commitments Land and buildings Not later than one year

750

529

750

529

Later than one year and not later than two years

491

243

491

243

Later than two years and not later than five years

481

387

481

387

Later than five years

696

493

696

493

2,418

1,652

2,418

1,652

No contingent rents have been recognised in the statement of financial performance during the year.

Operating lease commitment – Student Village accommodation The Student Village accommodation at 1510 Great North Road and Building Complex 310 were developed by Townscape Drummond Limited. The non-cancellable 10 year operating lease commitment of Student Village of Building Complex 310 is expiring on 13 February 2013. The lease commitment for 1510 Great North Road expired on 14 February 2012.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Âť NOTES TO THE financial statements 119


Unitec does not have a formal lease agreement with owners of Student Village at 1510 Great North Road but continues to rent the units on the basis of a monthly tenancy terminable on a month’s notice. The rents are paid under this contract at 85% of the rent for 42 weeks per annum of the mutually agreed upon fair market value. A new replacement lease for Building Complex 310 has not yet been agreed. The reported commitment of Student Village at 1510 Great North Road is $0 pending a new rental agreement. The lease commitment for Building Complex 310 reflects the remaining two months of the 10-year lease. Unitec is currently negotiating with the owners of student village at 1510 Great North Road and the 310 Building Complex for a new two year contract. The liability is calculated on the basis of current rental rates paid to the owners and the maximum exposure to rentals payable as at 31 December 2012 are as follows: Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Non-cancellable operating lease commitments Student Village Within one year

140

964

140

964

Later than one year and not later than two years

0

136

0

136

Later than two years and not later than five years

0

0

0

0

140

1,100

140

1,100

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Not later than one year

962

1,139

962

1,139

Later than one year and not later than two years

428

617

428

617

0

0

0

0

1,390

1,756

1,390

1,756

Other non-cancellable contracts

Consolidated

Parent Actual

Other non-cancellable contracts Details of commitments under these contracts are as follows:

Later than two years and not later than five years

Capital commitments Capital commitments represent capital expenditure contracted for at balance date but not yet incurred. At 31 December 2012, the group had capital commitments of $7,933,000 (2011: $9,333,000) principally relating to various building projects and capital projects. Capital commitments include projects that have contractual commitments.

120


Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Council approved contractual capital commitments

3,618

3,154

3,618

3,154

Total capital commitments

3,618

3,154

3,618

3,154

Of the Unitec Council approved capital commitments, the contractual commitments amount is $3,618,000 as at 31 December 2012 (2011: $3,154,000).

18. Contingent liability Personal grievances There were three open personal grievance claims from the 2012 financial year. The estimated costs could be up to $150,000 (2011: $30,000).

19. Contingent assets The Institute and group has no contingent assets.

20. Related party transactions The Institute is the parent of the group and controls three entities, being Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust, Unitec Recreation Trust and Unitec Trust as at 31 December 2012.

Crown and government Significant transactions with government-related entities The Government influences the roles of the Institute as well as being a major source of revenue. The Institute has received funding and grants from the Tertiary Education Commission totalling $81.919 million (2011: $79.309 million) to provide education and research services for the year ended 31 December 2012. The Institute also leases, at a nil rental amount, land and buildings legally owned by the Crown. Further information on the accounting for Crown-owned land and buildings is disclosed in note 1 under the heading ‘critical judgements in applying accounting polices’. Collectively, but not individually, significant transactions with government-related entities In conducting its activities, the Institute is required to pay various taxes and levies (such as GST, pay as you earn (PAYE), and Accident Compensation Cooperation (ACC) levies) to the Crown and entities related to the Crown. The payment of these taxes and levies is based on the standard terms and conditions that apply to all tax and levy payers. The Institute is exempt from paying income tax and fringe benefit tax (FBT). The Institute purchases goods and services from entities related to the Crown and it also provides services to entities related to the Crown. The purchase and provision of goods and services to government-related entities for the year ended 31 December 2012 were $4.259 million (2011: $3.869 million) and were all conducted on an arm’s length basis. The purchase of goods and services included the purchase of electricity from Meridian Energy Ltd, clincial placement for students at district health boards, research services from universities and other institutes, air travel from Air New Zealand and postal services from New Zealand Post. The provision of services to government-related entities mainly related to the provision of educational courses.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 121


Related party transactions with subsidiaries

All members of the group are considered to be related parties of Unitec. In 2012, Unitec paid the Unitec Recreation Trust rental of $70,000 (2011: $140,000) for the use of the Unitec Recreation Centre. The Unitec Recreation Trust will be disestablished in early 2013. The Unitec Recreation Trust gifted its ownership of the Recreation Centre Building at book value of $1,574,095 to its parent Unitec Institute of Technology in 2012. In 2012, Unitec invoiced Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust a total of $29,248 (2011: $32,358) for training and administrative services.

Ancillary services provided Purchases to related from related parties parties Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust Unitec Recreation Trust (to be disestabished in early 2013) Unitec Trust

Donation to related parties

Amounts owed to related parties

Amounts owed by related parties $000

$000

$000

$000

$000

2012

29

0

2011

32

13

2012

70

1,660

2011

140

2012

2011

Ancillary services to and purchases from related parties are made in arm’s length transactions at both normal market prices and normal commerical terms. Outstanding balances at 31 December 2012 and 2011 are unsecured and settlement occurs in cash. There have been no guarantees provided or received for any related party receivables. For the year ended 31 December 2012, the group did not raise any provision for doubtful debts relating to amounts owed by related parties as the payment history has been excellent (2011: $nil). This assessment is undertaken each financial year through examining the financial position of the related party and the market in which the related party operates. When assessed as required the group raises such a provision. Unitec paid audit fees for the following subsidiaries: »» Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust »» Unitec Recreation Trust (to be disestabished in early 2013) »» Unitec Trust.

Members of Council and key management Mr E K van Arkel is a Council member and a trustee of Unitec Trust and the Unitec Recreation Trust. Mr R Reid was a Council member and was a trustee of the Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust and Unitec Trust and is a member of the Unitec Recreation Trust. Dr R Ede is the Chief Executive and a trustee of the Unitec Trust, the Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust and the Unitec Recreation Trust. Mr P Conder is the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director Finance and Infrastructure and a trustee of the Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust. Mr G Hodge is the Executive Dean of the Faculty of Technology and Built Environment and is a trustee of the Unitec Apprenticeship Training Trust. Mr D Harry is a Council member and a trustee of the Unitec Trust.

122


Tansactions with key management personnel

Consolidated

Key management personnel compensation

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Salaries and other short-term employee benefits

Actual

2,526

2,492

2,526

2,492

Post-employee benefits

0

0

0

0

Other long-term benefits

0

0

0

0

Termination benefits

0

0

0

0

2,526

2,492

2,526

2,492

Key management personnel includes 12 senior executives of the parent and all members of Council. Councillors’ fees are included in the above and separately disclosed in note 5g. Related party transactions with Council members

During the year, the following Council members were members of organisations that have entered into transactions with Unitec Institute of Technology as part of the normal operations. Council fees are included in the following table only when the payments were made to their companies. Name of Council member

Company name

Director/shareholder

Types of transactions

Ten Gracie Square Ltd

Beneficiary and/or legal shareholder

Council fees

2012

2011

Transaction amount

Transaction amount

16,000

16,000

Payments: Anne Blackburn Aroha Hudson

Heart Foundation

Director

Renewal of affiliation fee

Dinu Harry

Bertelsen Harry Waters Ltd

Director

Council fees

Kaye Turner

Waikato Institute of Technology

Consultant

Conference (2011: Conference and staff training)

Kaye Turner

Manukau Institute of Technology

Chair of Council

Delivery of courses and misc (2011: Transfer of Income)

E van Arkel

Auckland Chamber of Commerce

Director

Membership fee and courses

E van Arkel

The Warehouse

Director

Minor equipment (2011: Catering and minor equipment)

30

35

16,000

16,000

195

5,766

117,712

92,287

1,780

1,630

78

1,659

Receipts: Charmian O’Connor

The Kate Edger Edu Charitable Trust

Consultant

Graduation

Kaye Turner

Waikato Institute of Technology

Consultant

Catering (2011: Legal costs and press and broadcast)

70,898

11,121

265

25,072 31,950

Kaye Turner

Manukau Institute of Technology

Chair of Council

Rental charges

40,250

Kaye Turner

Manukau Institute of Technology

Chair of Council

Tuition fees

30,060

Kaye Turner

Manukau Institute of Technology

Chair of Council

Maintenance fee

1,289

Kaye Turner

Manukau Institute of Technology

Chair of Council

Purchase e-books (2011: Purchase e-books and workshops)

8,500

9,862

All transactions with Council members occur within a normal supplier or client relationship on terms and conditions and are at arm’s length. No provision has been required nor any expense recognised for impairment of receivables, for any loans or other receivables to related parties (2011: $nil).

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 123


Related party transactions with staff members Name of staff member

Company name

Director/shareholder

Types of transactions

Ample Film Limited

Director

Capital investment for joint venture film production ‘Stars In Her Eyes’

2012

2011

Transaction amount

Transaction amount

235,400

Payments: Athina Tsoulis

All transactions with staff members occur within a normal supplier or client relationship on terms and conditions and are at arm’s length. No provision has been required, nor any expense recognised for impairment of receivables, for any loans or other receivables to related parties (2011: $nil).

21. Events after the balance sheet date There were no post-balance date events that would materially affect Unitec financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2012 (2011: nil).

22. Financial risk management objectives and policies Unitec has a series of policies providing risk management for interest rate, foreign currency and credit. Unitec is party to instrument arrangements as part of its everyday operation. The group’s financial instruments comprise bank loans, bank deposits, cash and short-term deposits. The group has various other financial instruments such as trade receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its operations. It is, and has been throughout the period under review, the group’s policy that no trading in financial instruments shall be undertaken. The main risks arising from the group’s financial instruments are interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. The Audit Committee reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below. The group also monitors the market price risk arising from all financial instruments. The magnitude of this risk that has arisen over the year is discussed in note 24. Interest rate risk Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates. The group has a mix of fixed and variable rate debt. Unitec manages its interest rate risk with a majority of its exposure through utilisation of fixed interest rates. Foreign currency risk The group has transactional currency exposures. The group’s exposure to such risk is minimal. Credit risk Credit risk is the risk that a third party will default on its obligation to the Institute and group, causing it to incur a loss. Due to the timing of its cash inflows and outflows, surplus cash is invested into term deposits which give rise to credit risk. The Institute and group limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution for term deposits to no more than 50% of total investments held. The group invests funds only with registered banks that have a Standard and Poor’s credit rating of at least A2 for short-term and A – for long-term investments. The Institute and group holds no collateral or other credit enhancements for financial instruments that give rise to credit risk. Liquidity risk The group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of bank overdrafts, bank loans, finance leases.

124


Concentration of credit risk Financial instruments that potentially subject Unitec to concentrations of risk consist primarily of cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable and a loan. Unitec places its cash and short-term investments with high-credit quality financial institutions and sovereign bodies and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the low level of revenue generated by customers other than the New Zealand Government. Short-term investments Unitec invests in call and short-term bank deposits. Such investment funds are apportioned amongst such banking institutions to ensure that this does not exceed 50% of the total available investments at that point of time.

23. Financial instruments Fair values Short-term investments The carrying amounts of all short-term investments are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Accounts receivable The carrying value of all accounts receivable as at 31 December 2012 is after making allowance for doubtful debts of $151,401 (2011: $231,143). The estimated fair value of Unitec’s financial instruments as at 31 December 2012 is not significantly different from the carrying value.

Financial instrument categories Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of all the group’s financial instruments that are carried in the financial statements at other than fair values. Consolidated

Carrying amount

Fair value

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Financial assets Cash

2,821

3,927

2,821

3,927

Trade and other receivables

3,155

3,857

3,155

3,857

5,976

7,784

5,976

7,784

7,226

8,471

7,226

8,471

3,802

3,171

3,802

3,171

0

7,000

0

7,000

Financial liabilities Trade and other payables Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts Floating rate borrowings Fixed rate borrowings

0

222

0

222

11,028

18,865

11,028

18,865

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 125


Parent

Carrying amount

Fair value

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2011

2012

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Cash

2,546

3,423

2,546

3,423

Trade and other Receivables

3,053

3,757

3,053

3,757

5,599

7,180

5,599

7,180

7,183

8,417

7,183

8,417

3,802

3,171

3,802

3,171

0

7,000

0

7,000

Financial assets

Financial liabilities Trade and other payables Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts Floating rate borrowings Fixed rate borrowings

0

0

0

0

10,985

18,588

10,985

18,588

Liquidity risk Management of liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Institute and group will encounter difficulty raising liquid funds to meet commitments as they fall due. Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. Flexibility in funding is maintained by keeping committed credit lines available. The Institute and group manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flow requirements and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.

Contractual maturity analysis of financial assets The table below analyses financial assets into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance date to the contractual maturity date. Year ended 31 December 2012

Carrying Contractual

<1

>1 – <2

>2 – <3

>3 – <4

>4– <5

>5

amount

cashflows

year

years

years

years

years

years

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Total

Cash

2,821

2,821

2,821

2,821

Trade and other receivables

3,155

3,155

3,155

5,976

5,976

5,976

5,976

Cash

2,546

2,546

2,546

2,546

Trade and other receivables

3,053

3,053

3,053

5,599

5,599

5,599

5,599

Consolidated 3,155

Parent

126

3,053


Year ended 31 December 2011

Carrying Contractual

<1

>1 – <2

>2 – <3

>3 – <4

>4 – <5

>5

amount

cashflows

year

years

years

years

years

years

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Total

Consolidated Financial assets

3,927

3,927

3,927

Cash

3,857

3,857

3,857

3,927

7,784

7,784

7,784

7,784

Liquidity risk

3,423

3,423

3,423

3,423

Management of liquidity risk

3,757

3,757

3,757

7,180

7,180

7,180

7,180

3,857

Parent 3,757

Contractual maturity analysis of financial liabilities The table below analyses financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance date to the contractual maturity date. Future interest payments on floating rate debt are based on the floating rate on the instrument at the balance date. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. Year ended 31 December 2012

Carrying

Contractual

<1

>1 – <2

>2 – <3

>3 – <4

>4 – <5

>5

amount

cashflows

year

years

years

years

years

years

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Total

7,226

7,226

7,226

7,226

Consolidated Trade and other payables

Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts

3,802

3,802

1,937

1,865

Floating rate borrowings

3,802 –

Fixed rate borrowings

11,028

11,028

9,163

1,865

11,028

7,183

7,183

7,183

7,183

3,802

Parent Trade and other payables Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts

3,802

3,802

1,937

1,865

Floating rate borrowings

Fixed rate borrowings

10,985

10,985

9,120

1,865

10,985

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 127


Year ended 31 December 2011

Carrying

Contractual

<1

>1 - <2

>2 - <3

>3 - <4

>4 - <5

>5

amount

cashflows

year

years

years

years

years

years

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

$000

Total

8,471

8,471

8,471

8,471

Consolidated Trade and other payables Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts Floating rate borrowings Fixed rate borrowings

3,171

3,436

1,932

1,504

3,436

7,000

7,019

7,019

7,019

222

242

94

94

53

242

18,865

19,168

17,517

1,598

53

19,168

8,417

8,417

8,417

8,417

Parent Trade and other payables Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts Floating rate borrowings Fixed rate borrowings

3,171

3,436

1,932

1,504

3,436

7,000

7,019

7,019

7,019

18,588

18,872

17,368

1,504

18,872

Sensitivity analysis The tables below illustrate the potential surplus or deficit and equity (excluding general funds) impact for reasonably possible market movements, with all other variables held constant, based on financial instrument exposures at the balance date.

Interest rate risk 2012 Consolidated

Cash and cash equivalents

Parent

+/- 1%

+/- 1%

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2012

2012

2012

2012

$000

$000

$000

$000

2,821

2,546

28

25

0

0

0

0

2,821

2,546

28

25

Bank loan

2011 Consolidated

Parent

Actual

+/- 1%

+/- 1%

Consolidated

Parent

Actual

Actual

Actual

2011

2011

2011

Actual 2011

$000

$000

$000

$000

Cash and cash equivalents

3,927

3,423

39

34

Bank loan

7,222

7,000

-72

-70

11,149

10,423

-33

-36

128


Explanation of interest rate risk sensitivity The interest rate sensitivity is based on a reasonable possible movement in interest rates, with all other variables held constant, measured as a basis points (bps) movement. For example, a decrease in 100 bps is equivalent to a decrease in interest rates of 1.0%. The other financial instruments of the group and parent that are not included in the above tables are non-interest bearing.

24. Capital management The Institute and group’s capital is its equity, which comprises general funds, and property valuation and fair value through comprehensive income reserves. Equity is represented by net assets. The Institute is subject to the financial management and accountability provisions of the Education Act 1989, which includes restrictions in relation to: disposing of assets or interests in assets, ability to mortgage or otherwise charge assets or interests in assets, granting leases of land or buildings or parts of buildings and borrowing. The Institute manages its revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, investments and general financial dealings prudently and in a manner that promotes the current and future interests of the community. The Institute’s equity is largely managed as a by-product of managing revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, investments, and general financial dealings. The objective of managing the Institute’s equity is to ensure that it effectively and efficiently achieves the goals and objectives for which it has been established, while remaining a going concern.

25. Major budget variances Explanations for major variations against the budget are as follows:

Statement of comprehensive income Government grants SAC-funded EFTS fell short of the Investment Plan target but above the 97% threshold but the main shortfall in this area relates to under achievement of Youth Guarantee EFTS. Student tuition fees Overall, EFTS levels were slightly below target, with the shortfall in domestic student fees and increased levels of subcontracted EFTS where no fees are charged by Unitec not offset by increased international student fees,

which resulted in an overall shortfall from budget. A further factor was an adjustment to the treatment of recognition of student fee income of courses starting mid-year. Interest income The carry over cash position from 2011 and reduced levels of capital expenditure enabled the cash position to be relatively strong throughout the year and enabled surplus funds to be invested. Other income Lower levels of external research income and lower than anticipated sales of house projects were major factors in the shortfall against budget. Employee benefit expenses Labour costs were 3.33% over budget, with staff levels higher than budget due to factors such as labour costs estimated with the delivery of the strategic initatives, and unbudgeted redundancy costs. Overall, staffing levels were over budget due to backfilling to meet the need for extended coverage for staff on sick leave, increased levels of staffing from that budgeted in the Student Administration area and increased levels of academic staffing from additional guest and part-time staff associated with operating the new Northern campus. Administration costs and other expenses Overall, costs were lower than budget but this was due mainly to continued tight management control of costs especially in the class materials area, the reduced levels of capital expenditure, which reduced borrowing levels reflecting a gain of $178,000 in reduced interest charges and the lower level of research activity expenditure.

Statement of financial position Current assets The overall cash position at the year end was higher than budget due to timing differences. Inventories are lower than budget due to a reduced number of unsold house projects at year end and the increase in prepayments is due to the significant increase in insurance costs at the time of renewal. Non-current assets Lower than budget due to a reduced capital expenditure programme from that originally envisaged. Capital Work in Progress has increased due to the IBM building refurbishment project due for completion in February 2013. Current liabilities Strong demand for places in 2013 has resulted in a slightly higher level of fees

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 129


in advance than budgeted. Employee entitlements have again increased and this again will be an area for management focus in 2013 especially in the academic leave area.

Statement of movements in equity The factors impacting on financial performance as outlined above account for the levels of equity, which are slightly below budgeted levels.

Statement of cash flows Operating activities Related to comments made above under statement of comprehensive income. Investing activities Some of the major commitments identified in the initial budget were deferred due to a reassessment of priorities. Financing activities As a result of the reduced level of capital spending the requirement for loan funding was significantly down on that originally budgeted.

130


UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» NOTES TO THE financial statements 131


132


Appendices for the year ended 31 December 2012


Students Unitec fosters an institutional culture in which innovation and enterprise are expected and rewarded. We are committed to providing students with the knowledge and skills to face the challenges of the future and to live in a multi-cultural world. We recognise and celebrate the diverse backgrounds of our students and are committed to offering them a socially, culturally and spiritually responsive environment. In particular, we aim to provide excellent academic and pastoral support for students, and to interact with them in whatever ways best suit their own styles of learning and personal development. The tables below show that our students come from a diverse range of backgrounds, and this is addressed by Unitec’s Diversity Strategy and policy that fosters equal educational opportunities.

Study load – all students 2012 Total students

2012 Total EFTS

2012 Percentage EFTS

2011 Total students

2011 Total EFTS1

2011 Percentage EFTS1

10,631

8,732

81%

10,735

8,358

79%

Part-time formal

5,572

1,625

15%

5,964

1,829

17%

Non-formal only

5,018

413

4%

5,149

435

4%

4

10,622

100%

2011 Total students1

2011 Total EFTS1

2011 Percentage EFTS1 38%

Full-time formal2

3

10,770

100%

2012 Total students

2012 Total EFTS

2012 Percentage EFTS

Female full-time

4,808

3,948

38%

5,017

3,879

Female part-time

2,724

817

8%

2,984

913

9%

Total female

7,532

4,765

46%

8,001

4,792

47%

Male full-time

5,823

4,784

46%

5,718

4,479

44%

Male part-time

2,848

808

8%

2,980

916

9%

Total students

21,221

21,848

Gender and study load – formal students

Gender and study load

Total male Total formal students

8,671

5,592

54%

8,698

5,395

53%

16,203

10,357

100%

16,699

10,187

100%

1. Figure differs from the 2011 Annual Report due to data corrections. 2. Formal students are enrolled in courses towards New Zealand Qualification Authority-approved qualifications. 3. In 2012, 292 students were enrolled in both formal and non-formal courses. 4. In 2011, 330 students were enrolled in both formal and non-formal courses.

134


Age breakdown

Age group Less than or equal to 19

2012 Total students

2012 Total EFTS

2012 Percentage EFTS

2011 Total students1

2011 Total EFTS1

2011 Percentage EFTS1

4,556

2,044

19%

4,648

2,022

19%

20 – 24

6,178

4,116

38%

6,208

3,999

38%

25 – 29

2,629

1,560

14%

2,746

1,547

15%

30 – 34

1,832

918

9%

1,882

894

8%

35 – 39

1,448

635

6%

1,485

631

6%

40 – 44

1,352

539

5%

1,432

548

5%

45 – 49

1,144

410

4%

1,190

388

4%

50 – 54

879

280

3%

945

283

3%

Greater than or equal to 55

1,203

268

2%

1,312

310

3%

21,221

10,770

100%

21,848

10,622

100%

2012 Total students

2012 Percentage6 enrolments

2011 Total students1

2011 Percentage6 enrolments1

New Zealand European

8,513

40%

8,788

40%

Māori

2,100

10%

2,178

10%

Pacific

2,836

13%

2,679

12%

Chinese

2,914

14%

3,164

14%

Indian

1,518

7%

1,521

7%

Other Asian

1,810

9%

1,867

9%

3,384

16%

3,228

15%

Total students

Ethnic breakdown

Ethnicity5

Other ethnic group Total students

21,221

21,848

5. Multiple responses used for ethnic groups. 6.The sum of percentages exceeds 100% because some students identify with more than one ethnic group.

UNITEC ANNUAL REPORT 2012

» APPENDICES 135


Staff Unitec is committed to equal employment opportunity principles, fostering excellence in staff performance and helping staff members reach their potential through targeted professional development opportunities. In doing so, Unitec complies with the spirit and intent of all relevant employment legislation, including the Human Rights Act 1977, the Race Relations Act 1971, the State Sector Act 1988 and the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987.

Equal employment opportunities statistical profile7

Staff totals (FTE)8

2012 Full-time

2012 Part-time

2012 Casual

2012 Total

2012 Percentage

2011 Total

2011 Percentage

451

120

43

614

100%

608

100%

With disability reported

37

15

2

54

9%

59

10%

New Zealand Māori10

34

8

1

43

7%

37

6%

Academic staff 9

10

Pacific

35

5

1

41

7%

37

6%

Female

181

83

23

286

47%

288

47%

Male

270

38

20

328

53%

319

52%

Allied staff

442

78

51

571

100%

573

100%

With disability reported9

44

6

1

51

9%

59

10%

New Zealand Māori10

28

5

3

36

6%

28

5%

Pacific10

30

8

5

43

8%

38

7%

Female

271

60

35

366

64%

369

64%

Male

171

18

16

205

36%

203

35%

7. The FTE figures presented above are the figures from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012. 8. The figures in this table exclude the ‘Paid on Invoice’ FTE figures. 9. Disability includes the following: asthmatic, arthritis, allergy, diabetes, epilepsy, high blood pressure, heart condition, hearing impaired, physical disability and sight impaired. 10. From 2012, the ethnicity data does not use prioritised ethnic groups.

136


CONTACT US Phone 0800 10 95 10 Fax +64 9 815 2905 Private Bag 92025 Victoria Street West Auckland 1142 New Zealand www.unitec.ac.nz Mt Albert Campus 139 Carrington Road Mt Albert Auckland 1025 New Zealand Northern Campus 10 Rothwell Avenue Albany Auckland 0632 New Zealand Waitakere Campus 5-7 Ratanui Street Henderson Auckland 0612 New Zealand


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.