The Times-Delphic

Page 1

THE STUDENT NEWSPAPER FOR DRAKE UNIVERSITY SINCE 1884

THE TIMES DELPHIC DES MOINES, IOWA | MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2012 | VOL. 131, NO. 39 | WWW.TIMESDELPHIC.COM

Privacy changes rattle cages by Abby Bedore

Staff Writer gabriella.bedore@drake.edu

For Drake University students, Google and Facebook’s recent privacy policy changes generate a range of feelings from indifference to anger. “I think it’s a convenience to get ads tailored to you, but it’s kind of a double-edged sword,” said sophomore music major Eric Ferring. “It’s a debate between convenience and constitutionality.” Google recently announced a privacy policy that would make it easier to cross-reference users’ activity data when people use more than one of its services. The new policy will become effective Thursday. The new Facebook profile, Timeline, has also created privacy concerns. Facebook’s new advertising format explains that users will not be allowed to opt out of sharing information from certain media features like music and news that are linked to the site. Although the policies upset some, Facebook and Google users do not have much choice if they want to use the websites. “Anyone who signs up for Google’s services probably signs early on, without even thinking (of) it, a terms-ofuse agreement,” said Mark Kende, a law professor and director of Drake’s Constitutional Law Center. Sophomore Nicole Westenberger is skeptical of the sites’ data collection. “If advertisers want some information, they can get it,” Westenberger said. “That just seems a little sketchy to me.” Like many students, Westernberger keeps her privacy settings under control. “All my privacy settings are pretty strict,” Westenberger said. “I don’t want my stuff all over Facebook.” Ferring keeps his Facebook profile private, too. While he enjoys the ads targeted from Facebook’s data gathering, Ferring said that he believes companies should draw a line with how much they share. “I still don’t think they should document every activity online,” Ferring said. Sophomore elementary education

major Grace Manz is outraged by Facebook’s advertising privacy policy. “I think it’s beyond insane,” Manz said. “I’ve stopped ‘liking’ things on Facebook, and half of what I do is delete the things that cause Facebook to gain weird information about me. “I know I consented to their policy terms, but I don’t think I understood the implications of that. I don’t think most people do,” Manz added. But not all students are suspicious of Google and Facebook’s intentions with user information. “I don’t think it’s anything new,” said sophomore Theodore Bartemes. “I read an article yesterday that said Target does the same thing. They track what people buy and send them relevant coupons.” Bartemes, a computer science and music major, said that collecting a user’s information helps a company without harming the user. “When it comes down to it, Facebook is a corporation,” Bartemes said. “They’ll do what they can to make it a better company and keep it free. I think that’s a good thing.” Before a person can use many of Google or Facebook’s services, he or she must consent to the terms and conditions listed by the company. “The experience for most people is that the terms and conditions are so legalistic that they don’t really read it all, they just click ‘accept,’” Kende said. “But when they do that, it’s like they waive their rights.” Few laws against individual data accumulation exist at this point because privacy issues are relatively new, having come up only in the past few years. Kende explained that general principles and judge-created common laws regarding Internet privacy exist in the United States. This includes statutes against intrusions into certain types of emails. Previously, lawyers tried applying laws that dealt with older technology like telephones or telegraph to Internet privacy issues. “They have some laws now that exist,” Kende said. “But with a lot of companies, you just have to accept their terms of use and waive certain privacies.”

SEE PRIVACY, PAGE 2

EDUARDO ZAMARRIPA | sports editor

Drake forward BEN SIMONS (LEFT) matches up against Creighton guard JAHENNS MANIGAT (RIGHT) during Saturday night’s game. Check out full coverage of the Bulldogs’ tournament run on page 6.

New Senators get to work outlining goals in first meeting by Lauren Ehrler

Staff Writer lauren.ehrler@drake.edu

Student Senate has welcomed two new faces around the table. Firstyear Krystle Thai and sophomore Ekta Haria were sworn in last Thursday to serve as Diversity Interest Senator-At Large and Diversity Interest Senator, respectively. Thai and Haria will serve the remainder of the 2011-12 session. Their appointments came after Diversity Interest Senator-At Large Tanaya Thomas and Diversity Interest Senator Ankita Dhussa both resigned earlier this semester. Treasurer Zach Keller announced that the Student Fees Allocation Committee has completed budget hearings for the upcoming school year. The preliminary budget will be released March 16 with the final

budget to be voted on at the April 12 Student Senate meeting. Sen. David Karaz reported that attendance at the J-Term information fair suggested even larger interest than expected. “I do understand that there will

be people who will not get into a JTerm,” Karaz said. “But we can ensure that the registration process will be fair.” Karaz said there would potentially be a second J-Term registration round for students who were not initially accepted into a class.

Prior notice was served on two bylaw amendments. Both the First-Year Interest Committee Amendment and the Drake Student Senate Student Affairs Handbook Amendment to Address Ad Hoc Organizations will come before a Senate vote next week. The First-Year Interest Committee Amendment will assign each member of the committee to be an intern to a senator for the year. The Student Affairs Handbook Amendment to Address Ad Hoc Organizations would essentially make it easier for temporary organizations to establish themselves on campus; for example, a student organization supporting a particular political candidate. Since last Thursday’s agenda was brief, current senators and new exec-

SEE SENATE, PAGE 2

Contraception vending machines fuel controversy by Bailey Berg

Staff Writer bailey.berg@drake.edu

Drake University students are divided about whether the university should follow in the footsteps of Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania. Shippensburg received a lot of scrutiny recently for a vending machine it had unveiled in the student health center more than two years ago. Instead of the typical power bars, Cheetos and packs of gum, the machine is stocked with condoms, pregnancy tests and, more controver-

sially, Plan B One-Step emergency contraceptives. “It makes it look like they’re promoting a society that relies on drugs and puts a candy-like image on them,” said first-year pre-pharmacy student Megan Friel. “Additionally, students could abuse the privilege of having such easily accessible drugs.” Drake is not considering adding a machine similar to the one at Shippensburg, a decision met with both praise and criticism from the Drake population. Friel isn’t alone in thinking the drug shouldn’t be as easily accessible

for students and would be better suited for a pharmacy. “It is not sold in non-pharmacy settings, so I don’t think it should be available in a vending machine,” said Jane DeWitt, associate professor of social and administrative sciences. Senior Kristina Vann agreed that the drug should not be that easily accessible. “Students should have to go to a pharmacist to get Plan B because they know more about it, and if there are any health concerns, they can be addressed,” Vann said. “Walgreens and Hy-Vee are both near by, so it’s

CARTER OSWOOD | staff photographer

Vending machines at the SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY IN PENNSYLVANIA provide students with various forms of contraception. Students can get protection the same way they buy soda or snacks in a residence hall.

inside

not out of our reach to go get it off campus.” Other students think that the drug has no business being on a college campus at all. “If a university were to install such vending machines, then it actively takes a stance on an issue, which in turn suppresses the views of people against it,” said sophomore law, politics and society major Sumit Sen. First-year BCMB major Wenel Jais-Cross also said that the school should not get involved in people’s personal lives in that way. “I think that what people decide to do in their sexual relationships should in no way be related to Drake, so Drake shouldn’t offer the pill,” Jais-Cross said. Others, however, see the machine more favorably and believe use of the medication should be left up to the discretion of the student in question. “While I can understand why some may think that such easy access might encourage irresponsible sexual behavior, I would rather that students have access to Plan B than either have unwanted pregnancies or seek abortion later,” said sophomore sociology major Jordan Payne. First-year journalism major Danielle Klocke said that she also thought having the pill accessible to students could be beneficial. “I definitely see what they’re trying to accomplish,” said Klocke. “It would make it less uncomfortable for students. There are no awkward questions involved.” Then, there are students who are split on the issue. “I think that this will help women be able to get medication they may need in unplanned circumstances,” said sophomore education major Kelly Nelson. “But I’m not sure a vend-

ing machine is the right or moral way to dispense it.” Brittany Michael, sophomore clinical and applied sciences major and certified pharmacy technician at Hy-Vee, said that she sees both sides of the argument. “I feel like if people have personal views that make it OK for them, then they should have the option because I know a lot of pharmacists won’t dispense it because of their personal views,” Michael said. “I also think it shouldn’t (be available) because it is a chemical, one that people might not know a lot about. It shouldn’t be used as a quick fix.” While it’s no secret that college students have sex, the vending machine has garnered national attention — it’s even become a punch line on shows such as “Saturday Night Live,” “The Simpsons” and “Tosh.O” — and it has people questioning how accessible the so-called “morning-after” pill should be, especially on a college campus. But how much more accessible is the medication? Sherry Sperlich, Planned Parenthood of the Heartland regional director of health services, said that anyone over the age of 17 could purchase the medication over-the-counter at any drug store. “Nearly half of all pregnancies are unplanned; many times because birth control methods fail or are not used properly,” Sperlich said. “Access to preventive services like birth control and emergency contraception is vital for women not ready to become a parent.” Taking Plan B within 72 hours of

SEE BIRTH CONTROL, PAGE 2

NEWS

OPINIONS

FEATURES

SPORTS

Security responds to a burrito fire alarm

Top 5 reasons to tune in to “Community”

Dress for success: You are what you wear

Women’s basketball earns win on Senior Day

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 5

PAGE 6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.