2012-13 Team Stats G W-L Pts 31 20-11 2131 33 29-4 2262 33 19-14 2168 35 22-13 2195 32 16-16 1995 30 12-18 1790 31 8-23 1772 29 8-21 1627 31 15-16 1670 31 8-23 1652 30 7-23 1517
Pct .354 .361 .368 .369 .377 .381 .401 .405 .417 .422 .437
ASSISTS ## Team 1. Appalachian State 2. Chattanooga 3. Davidson 4. Elon 5. Col. of Charleston 6. Samford 7. Furman 8. UNCG 9. Georgia Southern 10. Wofford 11. Western Carolina
G Assists Avg/G 31 478 15.42 33 493 14.94 35 522 14.91 33 446 13.52 32 408 12.75 31 380 12.26 30 361 12.03 31 308 9.94 31 277 8.94 29 256 8.83 30 214 7.13
SCORING DEFENSE ## Team 1. Samford 2. Chattanooga 3. Davidson 4. Appalachian State 5. Western Carolina 6. Wofford 7. Georgia Southern 8. Col. of Charleston 9. Elon 10. Furman 11. UNCG
G 31 33 35 31 30 29 31 32 33 30 31
Pts Avg/G 1685 54.4 1811 54.9 2005 57.3 1839 59.3 1799 60.0 1813 62.5 1951 62.9 2026 63.3 2101 63.7 2036 67.9 2124 68.5
3-POINT FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE ## Team G FG FGA Pct 1. Samford 31 217 632 .343 2. Chattanooga 33 208 662 .314 3. Elon 33 144 459 .314 4. Appalachian State 31 119 394 .302 5. Georgia Southern 31 161 537 .300 6. Davidson 35 144 485 .297 7. Col. of Charleston 32 157 534 .294 8. Furman 30 97 345 .281 9. Western Carolina 30 112 426 .263 10. UNCG 31 103 400 .258 11. Wofford 29 99 428 .231
STEALS ## Team 1. Appalachian State 2. Davidson 3. UNCG 4. Chattanooga 5. Elon 6. Col. of Charleston 7. Wofford 8. Western Carolina 9. Furman 10. Georgia Southern 11. Samford
G 31 35 31 33 33 32 29 30 30 31 31
SCORING MARGIN Margin ## Team G OFF DEF 1. Chattanooga 33 68.5 54.9 +13.7 2. Appalachian State 31 68.7 59.3 +9.4 3. Davidson 35 62.7 57.3 +5.4 4. Elon 33 65.7 63.7 +2.0 5. Samford 31 53.9 54.4 -0.5 6. Col. of Charleston 32 62.3 63.3 -1.0 7. Wofford 29 56.1 62.5 -6.4 8. Furman 30 59.7 67.9 -8.2 9. Western Carolina 30 50.6 60.0 -9.4 10. Georgia Southern 31 53.3 62.9 -9.6 11. UNCG 31 57.2 68.5 -11.4
3-POINT FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA Pct 1. Appalachian State 31 129 510 .253 2. Samford 31 118 458 .258 3. Chattanooga 33 126 475 .265 4. Davidson 35 144 524 .275 5. Georgia Southern 31 114 398 .286 6. Col. of Charleston 32 144 488 .295 7. Furman 30 111 374 .297 8. Elon 33 183 595 .308 9. UNCG 31 139 441 .315 10. Western Carolina 30 136 418 .325 11. Wofford 29 125 371 .337
TURNOVER MARGIN ## Team G Avg O-Avg +/1. Chattanooga 33 13.5 17.9 +4.45 2. Col. of Charleston 32 16.9 18.5 +1.56 3. Appalachian State 31 19.8 21.3 +1.52 4. UNCG 31 18.5 19.3 +0.81 5. Elon 33 16.9 17.4 +0.45 6. Davidson 35 17.6 17.5 -0.09 7. Wofford 29 19.6 19.4 -0.17 8. Western Carolina 30 16.4 15.4 -1.00 9. Samford 31 16.2 14.5 -1.65 10. Furman 30 19.2 16.5 -2.73 11. Georgia Southern 31 19.1 15.3 -3.84
FREE THROW PERCENTAGE ## Team G FTM FTA Pct 1. Appalachian State 31 426 551 .773 2. Samford 31 291 380 .766 3. Georgia Southern 31 343 466 .736 4. Furman 30 429 595 .721 5. Davidson 35 409 569 .719 6. Elon 33 370 524 .706 7. Western Carolina 30 287 431 .666 8. Chattanooga 33 376 581 .647 9. UNCG 31 335 538 .623 10. Col. of Charleston 32 352 579 .608 11. Wofford 29 312 522 .598
REBOUNDING MARGIN ## Team G Avg O-Avg +/1. Chattanooga 33 39.8 35.6 +4.2 2. Appalachian State 31 40.3 37.2 +3.1 3. Col. of Charleston 32 44.8 43.1 +1.7 4. Davidson 35 39.1 38.1 +1.1 5. Elon 33 38.8 39.1 -0.3 6. Furman 30 37.9 39.1 -1.2 7. Western Carolina 30 35.3 37.4 -2.0 8. Wofford 29 37.2 39.8 -2.6 9. UNCG 31 37.7 42.5 -4.8 10. Georgia Southern 31 35.4 40.4 -5.0 11. Samford 31 32.6 38.1 -5.5
ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO ## Team G Asst Turn Ratio 1. Chattanooga 33 14.9 13.5 1.11 2. Davidson 35 14.9 17.6 0.85 3. Elon 33 13.5 16.9 0.80 4. Appalachian State 31 15.4 19.8 0.78 5. Samford 31 12.3 16.2 0.76 6. Col. of Charleston 32 12.8 16.9 0.75 7. Furman 30 12.0 19.2 0.63 8. UNCG 31 9.9 18.5 0.54 9. Georgia Southern 31 8.9 19.1 0.47 10. Wofford 29 8.8 19.6 0.45 11. Western Carolina 30 7.1 16.4 0.44
FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE ## Team G 1. Appalachian State 31 2. Chattanooga 33 3. Elon 33 4. Davidson 35 5. Samford 31 6. Furman 30 7. Wofford 29 8. Col. of Charleston 32 9. UNCG 31 10. Georgia Southern 31 11. Western Carolina 30
BLOCKED SHOTS ## Team 1. Davidson 2. Elon 3. Appalachian State 4. Col. of Charleston 5. Western Carolina 6. Samford 7. Wofford 8. Furman 9. Chattanooga 10. UNCG 11. Georgia Southern
ATTENDANCE ## Team 1. Chattanooga 2. Davidson 3. Georgia Southern 4. Furman 5. Samford 6. Appalachian State 7. Elon 8. UNCG 9. Col. of Charleston 10. Western Carolina 11. Wofford
FG FGA 793 1861 839 1993 827 1979 821 1994 581 1532 632 1714 608 1654 743 2130 667 1923 574 1663 559 1648
Avg 68.7 68.5 65.7 62.7 62.3 59.7 57.2 56.1 53.9 53.3 50.6
Pct .426 .421 .418 .412 .379 .369 .368 .349 .347 .345 .339
FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE DEFENSE ## Team G FG FGA 1. Samford 31 600 1695 2. Appalachian State 31 651 1804 3. Davidson 35 778 2115 4. Chattanooga 33 669 1814 5. Col. of Charleston 32 739 1960 6. Elon 33 755 1982 7. Georgia Southern 31 739 1844 8. Wofford 29 665 1641 9. Western Carolina 30 671 1610 10. Furman 30 753 1785 11. UNCG 31 833 1906
G Blocks Avg/G 35 159 4.54 33 149 4.52 31 124 4.00 32 124 3.88 30 95 3.17 31 89 2.87 29 82 2.83 30 83 2.77 33 81 2.45 31 73 2.35 31 56 1.81
G 13 11 12 14 13 12 16 16 13 14 12
Steals Avg/G 368 11.87 345 9.86 303 9.77 319 9.67 312 9.45 296 9.25 268 9.24 226 7.53 215 7.17 207 6.68 191 6.16
ATTEND 33156 10373 6632 6985 6461 5714 7521 7368 5948 5111 3595
SOCONSPORTS.COM
SCORING OFFENSE ## Team 1. Appalachian State 2. Chattanooga 3. Elon 4. Davidson 5. Col. of Charleston 6. Furman 7. UNCG 8. Wofford 9. Samford 10. Georgia Southern 11. Western Carolina
Avg 2550 943 553 499 497 476 470 460 458 365 300
2013-14 WOMEN’S BASKETBALL
59