WINNER
RECENT JUDICIAL OPINIONS RELYING ON GREG JOSEPH’S WORK
Ŕ
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hill, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 352 (N.C. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2012)
Ŕ
Hammary v. Soles, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40033 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2013)
Ŕ
Cory v. Straub Int’l, 2012 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 10 (Kan. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2012)
Ŕ
Gerke v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22254 (D. Or. Feb. 19, 2013)
Ŕ
Just Film, Inc. v. Merchant Servs., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173455 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2012)
Ŕ
Martinez v. Garcia, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158220 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 5, 2012)
RECENT ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL ARTICLES CITING GREG JOSEPH’S WORK Ŕ Imwinkelried, Protecting the Attorney-Client Privilege in Business Negotiations: Would the Application of the Subject Matter Waiver Doctrine Really Drive Attorneys from the Bargaining Table?, 51 Duq. L. Rev. 167 (2013)
Ŕ
Goesel v. Boley Int’l (HK) Ltd,, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152524 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 24, 2012):
Ŕ
Dorsett v. County of Nassau, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79990 (E.D.N.Y. June 7, 2012)
Ŕ
Fox, The Return of “Voodoo Information”: A Call to Resist a Heightened Authentication Standard For Evidence Derived from Social Networking Websites, 62 Cath. U.L. Rev. 197 (2012)
Ŕ
Crooks, Fair Labor Fraud: The Peculiar Interplay of Civil RICO and the Federal Minimum Wage Act, 112 Colum. L. Rev. 2153 (2012)
Ŕ
Imwinkelried, The Validity of the 2010 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 Amendment Governing the Waiver of Work Product Protection: Is the Work Product Doctrine an Evidentiary Privilege?, 39 U. Dayton L. Rev. 3 (2012)
Ŕ
Pannozzo, Uploading Guilt: Adding a Virtual Records Exception to the Federal Rules of Evidence, 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1695 (2012)
Ŕ
Sample v. Qwest Commc’ns Co. LLC, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70927 (D. Ariz. May 22, 2012)
Ŕ
State ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62089 (S.D. Miss. May 3, 2012)
Ŕ
Rubloff Dev. Grp., Inc. v. SuperValu, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41304 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2012)
Ŕ
Dorsett v. County of Nassau, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71445 (E.D.N.Y. May 22, 2012)
Ŕ
Cameron v. Rohn, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18986 (D.V.I. Feb. 14, 2012)
Ŕ
Simmons & Ritter, Texas’s Spoliation “Presumption”, 43 St. Mary’s L. J. 691 (2012)
Ŕ
State v. Laine, 2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 935 (Wash. Ct. App. April 24, 2012)
Ŕ
Coppola & DeMarco, Civil RICO: How Ambiguity Allowed the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act to Expand Beyond its Intended Purpose, 38 N.E. J. on Crim. & Civ. Con. 241 (2012)
Ŕ
Isensee, Enforcing Against The Enforcers: Ensuring Immigration Compliance Through Civil RICO, 49 Hous. L. Rev. 101 (2012)
Ŕ
Rosenthal, 25th Anniversary of the Summary Judgment Trilogy: Reflections on Summary Judgment 43 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 471 (2012)
Ŕ
Simmons & Ritter, Texas’s Spoliation “Presumption”, 43 St. Mary’s L. J. 691 (2012)
Ŕ
Coppola & DeMarco, Civil RICO: How Ambiguity Allowed the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act to Expand Beyond its Intended Purpose, 38 N.E. J. on Crim. & Civ. Con. 241 (2012)
Ŕ
Isensee, Enforcing Against The Enforcers: Ensuring Immigration Compliance Through Civil RICO, 49 Hous. L. Rev. 101 (2012)
Ŕ
Poulin, Experience-Based Opinion Testimony: Strengthening the Lay Opinion Rule, 39 Pepp. L. Rev. 551 (2012)
ACQ GLOBAL AWARDS 2013