NCA 2009 President’s Award Recipient
When it comes to your to-do list,
put your future first. www.edwardjones.com
www.edwardjones.com
Decisions made in the past may no longer be what’s best for the future. To help keep everything up to date, Edward Jones offers a complimentary financial review.
When it comes to your to-do list, When it comes to your to-do list,
putyour your future future first. put first.
A financial review is a great opportunity to sit face to face with an Edward Jones financial advisor and Decisions made in the past may no longer be what’s develop strategies to help keep your finances in line best for the future. To past help keep everything date, Decisions made in the maygoals. no longer up be to what’s with your shortand long-term Edward Jones offers a complimentary financial review. best for the future. To help keep everything up to date, Edward Jones offers complimentary A financial review is aa great opportunityfinancial to sit facereview. to
To find out how to get your financial goals face with an Edward Jones financial advisor and onfinancial track, review call orisvisit today. A a great opportunity to sit face to develop strategies to help keep your finances in line face with anshortEdward financial with your andJones long-term goals.advisor and develop strategies to help keep your finances in line with and goals. Toyour find shortout how tolong-term get your financial goals
on track, call or visit today. Jason B Land, AAMS® To find out how to get your financial Financial Advisorgoals
In this Issue... Nevada Cattlemen’s Assn.............pgs. 3-4 Talking About NCBA........................pg. 5 NRRC: Budget...................................pg. 8
.
Buy Nevada: Dahl Angus Ranch.... pg. 13 Idaho Cattle Association.................. pg. 14
2213 5th Street JasonNorth B Land, AAMS® Suite A Financial Advisor Elko, NV 89801 . 775-738-8811 2213 North 5th Street
Suite A Elko, NV 89801 775-738-8811
Nevada’s Priority Weeds: Winter Annual Mustards..........pgs. 26-28 Coloring Page...................................pg. 28 NV Weed Management Assoc.: War on Invasive Species..................pg. 29
Fumes from the Farm...................... pg. 15
Elko Co. Farm Bureau...................... pg 18
Suite A Jason B Land, Elko, NV 89801AAMS® Financial Advisor 775-738-8811 .
Serviceberry.....................................pg. 25
Eye on the Outside......................... pgs. 10
Malson Bull Sale Report................. pg. 16
on track, call or visit today. 2213 North 5th Street
Range Plants for the Rancher:
Look Up: Warning-Danger Ahead..................pg. 30 HWCWMA:
Elko Co. CattleWomen Banquet....... pg.19
Control Methods.............................. pg. 33
The Organic Movement: Epilogu......................................pgs. 20-21
NVSRM: History of ARS.........pgs.34-35
Mind of a Millennial, Part III..........pg. 22
Beef Checkoff.............................pg. 36-37
Ramblings of a Ranch Wife.............pg. 23
Edward Jones...................................pg. 39
Member SIPC
ELKO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION Member SIPC
• Share Draft Accounts • Timeshare Certificates • ATM Cards/Debit Cards • IRAs • Visas
• Consumer Loans • Money Orders Member SIPC • Share Savings Accounts • Free Notary
The Progressive Rancher Owner/Editor/Publisher – Leana Stitzel progressiverancher@elko.net
Graphic Design/Layout/Production – Julie Eardley julie@jeprographics.com
Cover Photo: For Ever Calf — by Jessica Olsen Published 9 times each year, The Progressive Rancher is mailed to more than 7,000 approved addresses, and has digital and print readership reaching more than 30,000.
Summer makes us Smile
The Progressive Rancher is published monthly. The views and opinions expressed by writers of articles appearing in this publication are not necessarily those of the editor. Letters of opinion are welcomed by The Progressive Rancher. Rates for advertising are available upon request. Advertising in The Progressive Rancher does not necessarily imply editorial endorsement. Liability for any errors or omissions in advertisements shall not exceed the cost of the space occupied by the error or omission. The Progressive Rancher is free to people working and active in the livestock industry. The Progressive Rancher is donated to the agricultural industry. If you are not currently receiving this magazine on a regular basis, and would like to be a part of The Progressive Rancher family, contact us by e-mail at progressiverancher@elko.net, today, so we can include you on our mailing list. If you have moved or changed addresses, please notify us, by e-mail, so we can keep you informed. All requests for the magazine must be made by e-mail.
ELKO
2397 Mountain City Hwy. Elko Junction Shopping Center Elko, Nevada 89801-1496
Phone: (775) 738-4083 Fax: (775) 738-2582
2 May/June 2014
1188 Court St., #81, Elko, NV 89801 (208) 733-1828 • progressiverancher@elko.net
Phone: (775) 753-6272
WWW.PROGRESSIVERANCHER.COM
559 W. Spring Valley Ct., Ste. 7 Spring Creek, Nevada 898015-6811
www.elkofcu.org
Leana Stitzel, Owner/Editor
SPRING CREEK Fax: (775) 753-6280
Ads sent to or built by The Progressive Rancher become property of this magazine.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
RIDING FOR THE NCA BRAND Ron Torell, President Nevada Cattlemen’s Association
T
A 2014 Industry Snapshot
opping the list as the driest state in the nation, Nevada is mostly comprised of public owned and managed arid rangelands. The majority of our operations are spring calving cow-calf with a few cowcalf/yearlings. As a rangeland grass producing state (in comparison to an irrigation orientated row crop producing one), Nevada has access to fewer row crop by-product livestock feeds than other areas of the nation enjoy. Byproduct feeds add to both management flexibility and reduced winter feed costs. Because Nevada winters can be harsh and the growing seasons short, most producers export calves in the fall of the year selling at a negative marketing base in comparison to many other regions of the country. Is it any wonder then that when two or more beef producers get together the conversation often turns to the profit influencing centers of our industry: Weather, cost-of-production, the market, and/or politics? Nevada is currently in its third successive year of drought with 2014 being labeled as “severe.” At the time of this writing the snow pack in the Sierra Nevada Mountains is below normal with reservoirs and storage essentially nonexistent. The Humboldt drainage serviced by the snowpack in northeastern Nevada is projected to be far below normal. Rye Patch Dam has been reduced to a mere puddle with Lovelock farmers facing no allocation of water during the 2014 spring/summer growing season. White Pine County and those to the south are not much better off with winter moisture significantly below normal. Stock water ponds, creeks, springs and seeps are compromised to the point of drying up prematurely. Lack of stock water reduces our ability to distribute livestock and properly manage our grazing lands. Those holding Federal grazing permits face late turnout, and/or early off, and/or reduced stocking rates. Wildlife, feral horses and fisheries are severely compromised and face the same bleak spring and summer grazing season as do the state’s livestock. In many instances the yearly cost-of-production for the cow-calf producer in northern Nevada has escalated to well above $800/cow/year (fixed, variable and opportunity costs included). Extended drought conditions, lack of privately owned ground in Nevada to graze, reduced carrying capacity of Federal grazing permits and stock water issues have all driven the full-care “going rate” of leasing private ground to unaffordable levels. This excessively high rate is provided you can even find standing feed to lease. Hay prices for winter feeding have escalated due to several factors including corn for ethanol, dairy herd expanwww.progressiverancher.com
sion in southern Idaho, and the drought at home and in neighboring states. These factors all contributed to low supply and high demand for hay in the Great Basin, California and the Pacific Northwest this past winter. Residual aftermath, “old” standing forage, is long gone due to the extended drought. These factors coupled with reduced grazing on Federal land have increased the number of days most operations must feed hay to livestock. It was not uncommon for producers in northern Nevada to feed two tons of $200+/ton hay/per cow during the winter of 2013-2014. As a method of coping with drought most operations have reduced numbers of brood cows by twenty to thirty percent over the past three years. On the bright side of liquidation, the old, poor bags, poor disposition, dink raisers and late calver’s have gone to town. Nevada presently has the smallest but perhaps the best set of brood cows in history. As numbers are reduced, cost-of-production on a per animal basis increases due to simple economy of size. It is estimated that when numbers are permanently reduced by twenty-five percent, Federal lands grazers in northern Nevada will consider economically exiting the business. The market is the current positive note. The nation’s cow herd is the smallest it has been since the early 1950’s with domestic and export markets holding strong. Never in our wildest dreams would we expect to see fat cattle trading at $1.50/lb., yearlings north of $1.80, calves over $2.50, market ready cows at more than $1.00/lb. and bred cows and heifers trading at over $2500/head. Yes, from a marketing standpoint we have nothing to complain about. But are these prices sustainable at these levels? Will Nevada have a herd inventory to capitalize on this market due to drought-induced herd reductions? Politically little has changed and little is new. The potential endangered species listing of the bi-state and greater sage grouse continues on; the wild and free roaming horse debate which has been impending since 1971 remains constant; public land grazing issues - including wildfires and rehabilitation of our public lands - continue to be debated. These along with other wide-ranging issues (including but not limited to water and property rights, water and air quality, and urban encroachment) persist to demand the majority of NCA’s energy and resources. Through this monthly column our hope is to update those involved in the Nevada livestock industry about the issues NCA is working on. Nevada Cattlemen’s Association’s mission continues to be to promote, preserve and protect a dynamic and profitable Nevada beef industry. Should you like to visit with NCA staff or leadership feel free to contact NCA at 775-738-9214 or my NCA e-mail address ncapresident@nevadabeef.org
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 3
Nevada Cattlemen’s Association By Desiree Seal, Nevada Cattlemen’s Association Executive Director
Statement on Cattle Gather in Southern Nevada
(Elko, NV) April 16, 2014 – The Nevada Cattlemen’s Association believes that private property rights are at the foundation of our country and our liberty, and we know that the rule of law protects those property rights. Our policy supports private property interests that exist on public lands, including water rights and grazing rights. We also support the continued multiple use of public lands, as authorized by law and confirmed by the courts. It is under this framework of the rule of law that our property rights and multiple uses are protected. The multiple-use statutes allow timber, grazing, wildlife, recreation and other uses to carry on side-by-side in a way that, as the statute reads “will best meet the needs of the American people.” Increasingly, we see the federal government placing higher priority on uses other than grazing. This not only violates the multiple-use statutes, it violates the grazing and water rights that are also protected by laws such as the Taylor Grazing Act (TGA). Under the TGA, ranchers have a right to graze livestock on federal lands based on historical utilization. While this property interest is complex by nature—given that it exists on surfaces owned by the federal government—it is nonetheless a real property interest that is taxed and saleable. It must be protected. On the same token, ranchers who exercise their grazing rights are obligated to pay a grazing fee as established by law. Ranchers such as Mr. Bundy have found themselves with their backs against the wall Since 1959 - Manufactured in Scio, Oregon Main Office Powell Scales NW 39120 West Scio Rd. Scio, OR 97374 Ph 503-394-3660 Fax 503-394-3502 Toll Free: 1-800-451-0787
Spokane Office Inland Scales NW 5602 E. Desmet Ave. PO Box 11335 Spokane, WA 99211 Ph 509-535-4295 Fax 509-535-4296
Steve Orr • 503-510-3540 www.scalesnw.com • SteveOrr@ScalesNW.com • SCALES 800-451-0187
TRUCK SCALES • LIVESTOCK SCALES • WAREHOUSE SCALES • RENTAL SCALES MOBILE LIVESTOCK RENTALS AVAILABLE AT:
Bullet Rental - Klamath Falls, OR • ACW Rentals - Burns, OR • Powell Scales - Scio, OR
Rentals Available! CERTIFIABLE! AFFORDABLE! PORTABLE TRUCK SCALE S WITH STEEL RAMP OR MOBILE LIVESTOCK SCALE S AVAILABLE
SCALE SERVICE • SYSTEMS • PARTS • SALES & CONSTRUCTION
4 May/June 2014
as, increasingly, federal regulations have infringed on their public land grazing rights and the multiple use management principle. This is not only devastating to individual ranching families; it is also causing rural communities in the west to whither on the vine. In the west, one in every two acres is owned by the federal government. Therefore, the integrity of the laws protecting productive multiple use is paramount to the communities that exist there. The situation in Nevada stands as an example the federal agencies’ steady trend toward elevating environmental and wildlife issues over livestock grazing – in violation of the abovementioned laws and principles. Well-intentioned laws such as the Endangered Species Act—which are factors in Mr. Bundy’s case—are being implemented in a way that are damaging to our rights and to our western families and communities. In Bundy’s case the designation of his grazing area as a critical habitat for the endangered desert tortoise gave the BLM the rationale they needed to order a 500% decrease in his cattle numbers. There never was any scientific proof that cattle had historically harmed the desert tortoise. However, in accordance with the rule of law, we must use the system set forth in our Constitution to change those laws and regulations. Nevada Cattlemen’s Association does not condone actions that are outside the law in which citizens take the law into their own hands. Nevada Cattlemen’s Association (NCA) works hard to change regulations detrimental to the sound management of public lands in a lawful manner and supports the concept of multiple uses on federally managed lands and encourages members of the livestock industry to abide by regulations governing federal lands. Furthermore, Nevada Cattlemen’s Association supports effective range management through collaboration with resource management agencies and interested parties to achieve rangeland management goals for economically viable ranch operations and the conservation of wildlife species. With the above stated this case was reviewed by a federal judge and a decision was rendered to remove the cattle. Nevada Cattlemen’s Association does not feel it is our place to interfere in the process of adjudication in this matter. Additionally, NCA believes the matter is between Mr. Bundy and the Federal Courts. We regret that this entire situation was not avoided through more local government involvement and better implementation of federal regulations, laws, and court decisions. While we cannot advocate operating outside the law to solve problems, we also sympathize with Mr. Bundy’s dilemma. With good faith negotiations from both sides, we believe a result can be achieved which recognizes the balance that must be struck between private property rights and resource sustainability.
— NDOW Update —
As you will remember, NCA issued a press release (see The Progressive Rancher, April 2014, page 4) in response to NDOW’s anti-grazing viewpoints in the Draft EIS/ LUPA comments. The press release was issued on March 7, 2014. Members of President Ron Torell’s Executive Committee met with Director Wasley on March 31, 2014 to discuss with the Director the concerns of NCA. While both entities strongly stood behind their choices, NCA was pleased to have an open discussion with the Director. NDOW and NCA discussed the need to recognize the value of private lands to wildlife utilizing both private and public lands and specific concerns of NCA in reference to NDOW’s comments submitted for the Draft EIS/LUPA as well as any other concerns each entity may have. At the conclusion of the meeting, both entities agreed to seek opportunities for collaboration and better communication. The decision to suggest to membership to restrict cooperation with NDOW in response to NDOW’s actions was made by the Board of Directors of NCA. The Board will meet in June and will discuss any further action. Please feel free to contact myself (775-340-4486) or President Ron Torell (775-385-7665) should you have any further questions.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Talking About NCBA Joe Guild, 6th Region Vice President
I
t seems I can’t get away from talking about Washington D.C. when I write this column. I just returned from a week in our nation’s capital. NCBA and the Public Lands Council had their joint annual spring conference. Over 300 producers from all over the country descended on Washington. There were orientation meetings with the NCBA staff and individual meetings with the respective congressional delegations from each state attending. There were also reports from agency heads such as the BLM and the EPA and an opportunity to discuss relevant issues with fellow cattle ranchers from different regions of the country. I do not know how many readers have ever visited Washington D.C. but it is an experience all of us should have at least once. There are all the well-known monuments and memorials to see. Also, there are a multitude of museums and other sites such as the Capitol Building itself. Hundreds of school groups this time of year spend a week this time of year with chaperones to see the sights. Perhaps your own 7th or 8th grade students made such a tour as did our children at that age. You will also see dozens of advocacy groups visiting pleading the case for their causes to Congress as you make your own visits. However, the cattlemen stand out among all the other groups. Most of these ranchers wear their hats and boots. There is nothing more incongruous, but also compelling than 4 or 5 ranchers striding confidently across Capitol Hill in their hats and boots. Believe me these guys turn heads. I have also personally heard over the years from members of Congress that these personal visits are very important. Ironically, these representatives are somewhat isolated and they really like to see people from back home. They rely on the opinions and attitudes of their constituents more than you might imagine. I will discuss a few of the highlights and impressions I took away from what I talked about and heard during that week. I would also like to put in my monthly pitch on the importance of belonging to a national organization with such a Washington D.C. presence. One trip to DC and you would see why your involvement even with just your dollars is so important. The Public Lands Council heard a presentation from the new Director of the BLM, Neil Kornze, an Elko Nevada native. He was advocating for a program which would undertake to spay and neuter wild horses to break the cycle of births which is causing such an overpopulation of the ranges and the damage to the range especially in these current drought conditions. Kornze was sincere in his desire to institute this program but also frank in his concern there wasn’t enough extra money in the wild horse program budget to implement the program. Several members of the PLC from around the west, who have a particular problem with excess wild horses, including those of us in attendance from Nevada, were able to deliver the message of the need for more money to their respective Congressional delegations and members of their staffs. This is the kind of interaction which is able to often get real results, in my opinion. The entire group also heard from the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy at a breakfast meeting. Her purpose which she stated quite bluntly was to try and convince the audience to dig deeper into the new proposed regulation that
Nevada Water Solutions LLC C
Y
CM
Hydrologic Engineer
3 0 1 S I LV E R S T R E E T E L K O , N V 8 9 8 0 1 coverage offered through:
M
Water Rights / Resource Permitting Expertise
Thomas K. Gallagher, PE
will redefine a “Water of the United States”. The reason she asked us to do that was she is convinced the new rule will not make agriculture more subject to Clean Water Act jurisdiction than is the current case. There are a whole host of exemptions from this jurisdiction, in her opinion, which will allow agriculture to operate as it currently does without excessive EPA or Army Corps of Engineers oversight. (Please see the Eye on the Outside, page 10, in this issue for a more in depth discussion of this important topic). From my own observations and from the comments of those in the audience I talked to, I do not believe she was very successful in convincing us this new rule would not eventually become a huge burden on production agriculture by exposing us all to a great deal of federal oversight that doesn’t currently exist. NCBA has a lawyer on the Washington staff whose main job is to review environmental bills and regulations such as this. She is convinced this rule will ultimately put all of agriculture at risk of increased, unneeded federal government scrutiny. I agree with her. I have done a study of the regulation and I am unconvinced by the assurances of Administrator McCarthy too. As I said above, we met with the staffs from all of the Congressional delegation from Nevada, as did our counterparts from other states. We were also able to meet with several members of Congress personally and both of Nevada’s Senators. I know many other ranchers form all over the country were able to have similar personal meetings. We folks from Nevada concentrated on meetings with the BLM, US Forest Service and The Fish and Wildlife Service. As you might suspect, the potential endangered species listing of the greater sage grouse was a topic foremost on our minds in all of these meetings. The discussions were frank but cordial. I like to stress when talking about a potential listing the importance of private property to the existence of large numbers of sage grouse. 80% of the brood occurs on private land. Thus, it seems to me, the focus on habitat at the expense of recognition of where the largest numbers of the bird concentrate is missing a key component of a recovery strategy without the need to list the sage grouse as endangered. These are the sorts of things we discussed in depth with the various agencies we met with. Other ranchers had meetings with these agencies: USDA Marketing Service Livestock Market News Division; Farm Service Agency Livestock Disaster; United States Trade Representative; Food and Drug Administration, Animal Health; USDA APHIS, Wildlife Services Program; USDA Packers and Stockyard Administration and The EPA Office of Water/ Agricultural Counselor. These meetings were all arranged and coordinated by the relevant NCBA staff person with that expertise in the Washington office. All in all it was a very productive meeting. Every time I attend such a meeting I am reminded of what a friend of mine says many times: it may not be apparent these meetings produce successful outcomes for ranchers but it is almost guaranteed ranchers would not like the results if they did not show up and make their voices heard. The NCBA office works very hard to make sure cattle rancher’s voices are heard loud and clear every time there is an issue which could have some impact on their lives or businesses which is observed in a Federal Agency or in Congress. It is also such a privilege to have been chosen to represent your interests in this national organization. I think about what I can do to help you and I survive in this agricultural world every day. Let me know if I can help you in that regard. I’ll see you soon. Hometown Solutions_EighthPageAd_sans.pdf 1 7/21/11 2:21 PM
MY
CY
Over 31 years of experience with the Nevada State Engineer’s Office
For a complete review of your insurance needs and details on coverage and credits available, contact our Farm & Ranch specialist:
CMY
775•825•1653 / FAX 775•825•1683 675 Sierra Rose Dr., #109 / Reno, NV 89511 tomg@nevadawatersolutions.com www.progressiverancher.com
Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
Protecting families and businesses in the West since 1894.
775.777.9771
K
Farm ■ Ranch ■ Agribusiness
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 5
A specialized industry deserves our specialized attention. From operating lines and equipment financing to livestock purchases and real estate, we have supported Nevada’s farmers and ranchers for over half a century. That knowledge and experience is personified by John Hays, our agricultural banking specialist. He’ll come to you, and will get to work finding the right financial solutions,* so you can plan, prepare, and grow. Bring your banking home. John Hays, Agricultural Banking Specialist 775.525.6744 nsbank.com I 54 years in Nevada 50 branches statewide *Loans subject to credit approval, restrictions apply.
6 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Sign-Up Begins for USDA Disaster Assistance Programs Restored by Farm Bill
More than 2,000 Farm Service Agency Offices Across the Country Stand Ready to Assist
UPCOMING VIDEO SALES
WASHINGTON, April 15, 2014 – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced that starting today, eligible farmers and ranchers can sign up for U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) disaster assistance programs restored by passage of the 2014 Farm Bill. “We implemented these programs in record time and kept our commitment to begin sign-up today,” said Agriculture Secretary Vilsack. “To ensure enrollment goes as smoothly as possible, dedicated staff in over 2,000 Farm Service Agency offices across the country are doing everything necessary to help producers that have suffered through two and a half difficult years with no assistance because these programs were awaiting Congressional action.” Depending on the size and type of farm or ranch operation, eligible producers can enroll in one of four programs administered by the Farm Service Agency. The Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP), and the Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) will provide payments to eligible producers for livestock deaths and grazing losses that have occurred since the expiration of the livestock disaster assistance programs in 2011, and including calendar years 2012, 2013, and 2014. The Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honeybees, and Farm-Raised Fish Program (ELAP) provides emergency assistance to eligible producers of livestock, honeybees and farm-raised fish that have suffered losses because of disease, severe weather, blizzards and wildfires. Enrollment also begins today for the Tree Assistance Program (TAP), which provides financial assistance to qualifying orchardists and nursery tree growers to replant or rehabilitate trees, bushes and vines damaged by natural disasters. Producers signing up for these programs are encouraged to contact their local FSA office for information on the types of records needed and to schedule an appointment. Taking these steps in advance will help producers ensure their application moves through the process as quickly as possible. Supporting documents may include livestock birth records, purchase and transportation receipts, photos and ownership records showing the number and type of livestock lost, documents listing the gallons of water transported to livestock during drought, and more. Crop records may include purchase receipts for eligible trees, bushes, or vines, seed and fertilizer purchases, planting and production records, and documentation of labor and equipment used to plant or remove eligible trees, bushes, or vines. Producers have three to nine months to apply depending on the program and year of the loss. Details are available from any local FSA office. For more information, producers may review the 2014 Farm Bill Fact Sheet, and the LIP, LFP, ELAP and TAP fact sheets online, or visit any local FSA office or USDA Service Center
FRIDAY, MAY 23RD Cottonwood, CA
FRIDAY, JUNE 13TH Cottonwood, CA
MONDAY WEDNESDAY JULY 14TH 16TH THROUGH
THROUGH
Silver Legacy • Reno, NV Catalog Deadline: Thursday, June 26th WATCH & LISTEN TO THE SALE on the Web at:
For details call (530) 347-3793 or the representative nearest you:
Gary Nolan
Mark Venturacci
Steve Lucas
Elko, NV
Fallon, NV
Paradise Valley, NV
(775) 934-5678
(775) 427-8713
(775) 761-7575
Brad Peek— — (916) 802-7335 or email us at wvm@wvmcattle.com
Garcia Bits & Spurs -gifted! The gift that won’t be re Bit #122 $475 NV. Sales tax 6.85% S&H $12
www.progressiverancher.com
Spur #273 $475 NV. Sales tax 6.85% S&H $12
Look for the catalog and pictures on our website www.wvmcattle.com 500 Commercial St. Elko, NV 89801
Market your cattle with the professionals!
Phone: (775) 738-5816 Fax: (775) 738-8980
capriolas.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 7
Nevada Rangeland Resources Commission by Rachel Buzzetti, Executive Director
Nevada Rangeland Resources Commission Sets Budget to Help Promote Public Land Grazing
Nevada Ranchers Caretakers of our
Rangelands
Cowboys and sheepherders produce food and fiber for the nation. Growing food on Open range is a natural biological process.
Grazing actually benefits the land with hoof action and natural fertilization. Plants are healthier and regenerate faster after the herds move to a new range.
Antelope and other game animals and birds take advantage of the improvements made by ranchers.
Grazing cattle and sheep coexist peacefully with native wildlife and, in fact, make a friendlier habitat for many species.
Sheep often graze on steep terrain and can control cheatgrass, a major fuel for wildfires.
E
ach year the Nevada Rangeland Resource Commission (NRRC) meets and sets their budget priorities for the upcoming year. This year the NRRC will be partnering and funding the following organization’s activities, which are consistent with the NRRC’s mission to reach out to the public and help them understand the value of public land grazing. Sustainable Grazing Coalition Formed in 2005 the Coalition is a group of livestock grazing advocates consisting of the Nevada Cattlemen’s Association, the Nevada Farm Bureau, the Nevada Central Committee, the Nevada Board of Agriculture, and the Nevada Rangeland Resources Commission. The primary purpose of the coalition has not only been to keep track of the notices in the Federal Register as announced by the land management agencies, but more importantly to provide comments on these decisions in a timely manner. Most recently the largest ongoing project has been the Greater Sage Grouse. The coalition has built an extensive library of scientific literature regarding the Grouse and its’ habitat, consequently all of this literature was shared with Nevada’s livestock industry in providing thorough comments. Range Magazine Their charter is to provide and disseminate information about the use, care and maintenance of natural resources. Range will renew 500 gift subscriptions for doctors’ and attorneys’ offices back East, which will say “Compliments of Nevada ranchers.” All four issues of Range will have a full color and full-page ad. Additionally, Range’s “Brushstrokes & Balladeers” book will be mailed to all 652 Nevada libraries for art, literature and history classes. Great Basin Water Network Founded in 2005, when the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) re-activated its groundwater applications all over Nevada. The wide-ranging Network works vigorously to oppose SNWA’s massive water exportation project. Their goal being to educate as many rural and urban people about the economic, environmental and social impacts of the proposed SNWA project as well as legally respond to court rulings. KNPB Learning Media.org Since its inception in 2012, KNPB’s LearingMedia.org site has provided over 35,000 video and audio lesson materials for the classroom. Targeting grades 7-8 KNPB will condense and edit video footage from the Stewards documentaries and make them available to the schools through on-line and downloadable lessons a Stewards educational series. The Progressive Rancher Founded in 2001 to honor agricultural traditions, while embracing modern education. The grant will promote Nevada Rangeland education materials to an audience which is affected financially by the health of Nevada Rangelands and to educate the readers both in the magazine and on the internet as to how the livestock industry continues to improve and steward the land. Town of Genoa The Genoa Cowboy Festival serves as a destination event attracting people from all over the nation. During the festival the “Endangered West” and “Rangeland Under Fire” both part of the Stewards documentary series will be presented to attendees. Showing these two documentaries will help the attendees develop a better understanding of the role Nevada’s public land ranchers play in rural issues like wildfire, wild horses, and the sage grouse issues.
Nevada Rangeland Resources Commission was created by the State of Nevada to promote responsible public land grazing. Representatives come from Nevada state grazing boards, Nevada Woolgrowers, Nevada Farm Bureau, and Nevada Cattlemen’s Association.
Nevada FFA Rangeland Assessment Career Development Event This event is an opportunity for students to learn about rangeland ecosystems, native and non-native plants, shrubs, forbs and more in the field -- skills that will help them prepare for a career in rangeland management.
4780 East Idaho Steet, Elko, NV 89801 • 775-738-4082
The NRRC is governed by a commission of nine voting members. These members are nominated through each of the grazing boards, Nevada Cattlemen’s Association, Nevada Woolgrowers and the Farm Bureau; then appointed by the Governor. The NRRC has one part-time staff person. For more information about the NRRC please visit our website at www.nevadarangelands.org.
WWW.NEVADARANGELANDS.ORG This ad is funded through the NRRC’s assessment of 10 cents an AUM paid by public land ranchers.
8 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
OFFICE: 775-423-7760 JACK PAYNE
Cell: 775-217-9273 Alt: 775-225-8889
Email: nevadalm@yahoo.com
Full-Service Cattle Sales & Marketing serving the Fallon, Nevada and Outlying Areas. Sales Results from
APRIL 16
AND 17 , 2014 REGULAR BUTCHER COW BULL SALE AND FEEDER SALE Seller
Selmi Brothers Livestock
TH
City
Carson City
TH
# Head Desc.
7
Type
Weight
Price CWT
Mix
Bred Cows 1376
$1,220.00
Selmi Brothers Livestock
Carson City 6/6
Mix
Cow Calf Pairs 1307
$1,650.00
Selmi Brothers Livestock
Carson City 7/7
BLK Cow Calf Pairs 1241
$1750/HD
Selmi Brothers Livestock
Carson City
1
Blk
Bred Cow
1180
$1,290.00
Ronald Lee Berg
Rount MT
1/1
BLK
Cow Calf Pair 1280
$1600/HD
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
4
Mix
STR
488
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
8
CHAR
STR
425
$210.00
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
4
CHAR
STR
354
$220.00
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
1
CHAR
STR
265
$225.00
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
1
RD
Bull/Calf
125
$310.00
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
BRDL
STR
550
$127.00
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
BLK
STR
540
$150.00
Golconda
1
WF
STR
1025
$115.00
Jordan Valley 2
BLK
STR
473
$218.00
Richard J Rosasco Bob Corbari
$212.00
Fredric & Betty J Stodieck
Minden
11
BLK
STR
536
$216.00
Stix Cattle Company
Fernley
1
BLK
STR
640
$125.00
Laverne Albaugh
Fallon
5 SHRT HORN
STR
596
$203.00
Laverne Albaugh
Fallon
1 SHRT HORN
STR
503
$201.00
Jock or Tammy McErquiaga
Fallon
2
Mix
Bull/Calf
445
$156.00
Dennis & Kathi Lee
Fallon
1
BRDL
STR
885
$119.00
Dennis & Kathi Lee
Fallon
1
WF
STR
860
$119.00
Dennis & Kathi Lee
Fallon
1
WF
STR
675
$143.00
Winnemucca 16
Mix
STR
473
$229.00
David C Piquet David C Piquet
Winnemucca 11
BLK
STR
445
$223.00
David C Piquet
Winnemucca 12
Mix
STR
398
$237.00
Ray & Lynn Kretschmer
Tonopah
1
BLK
STR
510
$180.00
Bruce Humphrey
Fallon
3
BLK
STR
587
$206.50
Bruce Humphrey
Fallon
5
BLK
STR
405
$230.00
Bruce Humphrey
Fallon
2
BLK
STR
295
$218.00
John Getto
Fallon
1
RBF
Bull/Calf
415
$179.00
Bobbi Jo Evans
Fallon
2
BLK
STR
503
$217.00
Alan Ansotegui
Fallon
2
BLK
STR
590
$212.00
Norris Albaugh
Fallon
18 SHRT HORN
STR
596
$203.00
Norris Albaugh
Fallon
4 SHRT HORN
STR
503
$201.00
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
4
CHAR
STR
354
$220.00
Stone Cabin Ranch LLC
Tonopah
1
Mix
HFR/Calf
110
$210.00
Nathan Pudsy
Fernley
3
BLK
HFR
242
$164.00
Nathan Pudsy
Fernley
1
RD
HFR
220
$195.00
S A LE
Sales Results from
APRIL 16TH AND 17TH, 2014 REGULAR BUTCHER COW BULL SALE AND FEEDER SALE Seller
City
Every Wednesday
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Small Barn at 10:30 AM Butcher Cows at 11:30 AM
Type
Weight
BLK
HFR
475
$170.00
2
BLK
HFR
333
$200.00
Fallon
1
WF
HFRTT
1060
$110.00
Peter J & Kathy F Marvel
Paradise Vly
1
BBF
HFRTT
1110
$115.50
Duane & Tammy Boggio
Paradise Vly
1
BLK
HFRTT
1075
$114.50
Duane & Tammy Boggio
Paradise Vly
1
BLK
HFR
910
$120.00
Duane & Tammy Boggio
Paradise Vly
6
BLK
HFR
693
$146.50
Fredric & Betty J Stodieck
Minden
9
BLK
HFR
482
$195.00
Ted Renfroe
Fallon
1
BBF
HFRTT
1405
$108.00
Ted Renfroe
Fallon
6
BLK
HFR
170
$198.00
Karmen Quintero
Schurz
1
RBF
HFR
430
$140.00
Jock or Tammy McErquiaga
Fallon
1
Mix
HFR
440
$170.00
Fallon
1
RD
HFR
420
$167.00
Winnemucca 13
BLK
HFR
435
$217.00
Jock or Tammy McErquiaga David C Piquet Ray & Lynn Kretschmer
Feeder Cattle at 1:00 PM
CafĂŠ
Open on Sale Days Stop by and have a Homestyle Burger
Look for Weekly Market Reports at www.nevadalivestock.us We have 4 cattle trains available for your cattle hauling needs. We can haul approx. 80,000# of cattle per load either to our sale or in the country. Give us a call for pricing.
# Head Desc.
Price CWT
Tonopah
1
BLK
HFR
395
$162.00
Round MT
1
BBF
HFR
335
$160.00
Robert & Carolyn Fowkes
Fallon
8
BLK
HFR
480
$205.50
Robert & Carolyn Fowkes
Fallon
1
BLK
HFR
315
$218.00
Bruce Humphrey
Fallon
5
BLK
HFR
351
$227.00
John Getto
Fallon
1
BRN
HFR
325
$192.00
Ted & Lois Debraga
Fallon
1
BLK
HFR/Calf
90
$200.00
Joe or David Sceirine
Chance L Kretschmer
Yerington
16
BLK
HFR
613
$170.00
Jeff Whitaker
Fallon
1
HOL
COW
1180
$104.00
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
BLK
COW
1425
$102.50
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
BBF
COW
895
$100.00
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
RD
COW
825
$101.00
Golconda
1
Mix
COW
1480
$97.00
Bob Corbari
Jordan Valley 1
BLK
COW
1225
$93.00
Bob Corbari
Jordan Valley 1
BLK
COW
935
$92.00
RBF
COW
1340
$93.75
Richard J Rosasco
Dan & Abigah J Duncan
Lovelock
1
HI-Test Products LLC
Fallon
1
HOL
COW
1950
$100.00
HI-Test Products LLC
Fallon
1
HOL
Cow
1230
$100.00
Juniper Mountain Cattle LLC
Fallon
1
WF
Bull
1675
$110.00
Peter J & Kathy F Marvel
Paradise Vly
1
BLK
Bull
2015
$110.50
Stix Cattle Company
Fernley
1
BLK
Bull
1315
$108.50
Genoa Livestock
Minden
1
WF
Bull
1925
$106.50
Hendrix Ranch
Fallon
1
WF
Bull
1735
$109.00
TO ALL OF OUR CONSIGNORS & BUYERS www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 9
By Joe Guild
W
ater: who controls it and how it is controlled determines how the land associated with that water will be managed and what uses that land can be put to. This is especially true in the west where a system of regulated water use has evolved ever since the first settlers-mostly mining prospectors- moved from the east where water was much more abundant and not as scarce. Writing from Nevada, I am reminded we also are subject in this state to some of the strongest water laws in the country. For the driest state in the nation this is as it should be with such local control. Given that we could agree local control of most things except missile defense and other national interests is the best course of action, state control of its own water law is a very good thing. The opposite of a good thing is a bad thing. So if state control of the water within its borders is a good thing, federal government control of water within a state would be a bad thing. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule on March 25th of this year. The EPA has tried for years to redefine what is a Water of the United States (WOTUS). Why would this agency want to do this? Well, it just so happens the Clean Water Act gives the EPA jurisdiction to regulate all WOTUS. So, if they can regulate more water the agency has more power. All of us know that bureaucracies such as the EPA like more rather than less power. Indeed, what agency would not want enough power to regulate almost all of the land in the entire United States? You pass the test if you said The EPA. And, you get an “A” if you answered the EPA and The Army Corps of Engineers. Both agencies have publically stated the definitional changes in this new WOTUS rule will not result in a significant expansion of federal control of land and water resources all across this nation. The stated reason to change the definition from what were traditionally “navigable waters” subject to CWA jurisdiction by the agency is the Supreme Court in two recent decisions according to the EPA confused the issue. The EPA is only clarifying a muddy situation according to its own explanation. However, if you dig deeper beyond the agency statements and analyze the proposed rule you might agree with me and disagree with the agencies. In fact, depending upon how the agencies implement this rule, the result could be an increase in permitting and regulatory requirements over water use especially if you are a rancher. If you wish to read for yourself, go to www.epa.gov/uswaters. I wrote in another column in this edition reporting about a recent trip to Washington D.C. In that column I mentioned a speech the current Administrator of the EPA, Gina McCarthy made to a breakfast meeting of the NCBA members attending the Washington Conference. The reason for her outreach was to reassure ranchers the EPA had listened to the agricultural sector’s concerns and after issuing the proposed rule had reached a Memorandum of Understanding with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). This MOU describes how the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers and USDA are to work together to implement the new rule “to protect and enhance water quality and ensure consistency and predictability for the public”. This MOU also describes the agricultural conservation practices which will be exempt as “normal farming practices” under the CWA. This attempt to satisfy the concerns of production agriculture, while somewhat heartening, still obscures the real issue. The proposed rule, no matter how sugar-coated, greatly expands the reach of the federal government into land use regulation in places and areas it has never been before. Arguably, it preempts state water laws and regulation which might conflict with the new expansion of the CWA. This should concern every state but most certainly those states which have not experienced land use regulation by the federal government such as those east of the Mississippi River. We in the west know all about such big government involvement. I will give examples of the 56 exemptions from jurisdiction the EPA has proposed below. However, think what an exemption from the reach of a rule really means. If you have an exemption by government rule from getting a permit to discharge into a WOTUS, the implication is that you are discharging into a water of the United States and therefore, at any point in the future the rules can easily be changed and you will be required to get a permit to engage in your normal farming and ranching practices. One of the listed exemptions is prescribed grazing. The only logical conclusion I can
10 May/June 2014
reach is that since it is proposed to be exempted, the EPA thinks livestock grazing is currently an unauthorized pollution causing discharge into the WOTUS. Another practice listed as an exemption is prescribed burning. This means the agency views the ash in the air from a fire which lands in a ditch to be an unauthorized discharge under the CWA. Other proposed exemptions are return flows from irrigation, maintenance of drainage ditches and construction and maintenance of farm roads. All of these practices we must assume are implied unauthorized discharge possibilities if they would need to be exempted from the rule. The reason for this increased reach by this agency is two Supreme Court cases attempted in the last ten years to clarify the definition of a Water of the United States and the EPA thinks there is less clarity now than there was before. An example of this point is the definition of the word tributary [of a WOTUS]. Tributary means all waters including wetlands, adjacent to traditional navigable water, interstate water, or the territorial seas. This definition includes lakes, ponds, ditches, ephemeral, intermittent or perennial streams. Furthermore, adjacent in this context doesn’t just mean next door. It means anything within the same floodplain or riparian area. This gets to what I meant by significant land use regulation above. Here is what Justice Scalia wrote in one of the decisions the EPA thinks it needs to help clarify what a water of the United States is for regulation under the Clean Water Act: “ In applying the definition [ of a Water of the United States] to ‘ephemeral streams’, ‘wet meadows’, storm sewers and culverts, directional sheet flow during storm events, drain tiles, manmade drainage ditches, and dry arroyos in the middle of the desert, the Corps[of Engineers] has stretched the term ‘Waters of the United States” beyond parody. The plain language of the statute [the CWA] simply does not authorize this ‘Land is Waters’ approach to federal jurisdiction.” (Writing for the plurality in Rapanos v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 2208 at 2222.) What is unclear about this language? Is Justice Scalia just taking a gratuitous pot shot at the EPA and Army Corps for the fun of it? I do not think so. He is saying in this case that the agencies have gone too far in their interpretation of what is jurisdictional for regulation under the CWA and he is saying back off. So what does the agency do in response to this clear direction form the Supreme Court? They say the law is unclear and they seek to expand their jurisdiction under that rationale. In other words, they disagree with the direction from the court and they flip the decision on its head by issuing a proposed rule that does exactly what the Supreme Court said it could not do- regulate land as water under the Clean Water Act. If this isn’t Alice in Wonderland I do not know what is. Let me expand a bit on the exemptions which are attempting to assuage the fears of production agriculture. Administrator McCarthy told us nothing will change under the proposed rule. She said normal farming and ranching practices currently exempted under section 404 of the CWA will still be in place along with the 56 listed exemptions. However, the rule will impose a new regime of compliance with the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as the inspection and enforcement compliance agency along with the Army Corps and the EPA. This is because the NRCS conservation practice standards are the guidelines to determine if a dredge and fill section 404 permit will be required. This is in spite of the fact that the practice involves a normal farming or ranching practice. Let me ask another dumb question. If nothing is really changing under the proposed rule, will adding more layers of bureaucracy help to clean up our already clean water here in the United States? After all, last time I checked the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland was no longer burning and you can fish and swim in Lake Erie without contracting an incurable disease. All around me in the room that day at breakfast the audience had the same reaction to the speech by Administrator McCarthy. The message of “I am here from the government to help you” did not resonate well in that room. The people I speak with from Washington from time to time are insulated from normal people so much they think by just continuing to do things they are really helping us. By doing less or sometimes nothing they would help us a lot more. Is it any wonder when you read the plain meaning of Justice Scalia’s words and then you see what the EPA is trying to do we do not trust these folks more? There is too much Federal Government. It is too big. It tries to do too much and it doesn’t listen as often as it should to the concerns of the citizens it purports to serve. I’ll see you soon.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Attention Readers:
Very Important Message from Nevada Legislative Committee April 3, 2014 Neil Kornze, Acting Director Bureau of Land Management United States Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW, Room No. 5665 Washington, D.C. 20240
sure that the grazing industry in Nevada is protected from unfair and inconsistent rulings. The Committee would like to invite you to an upcoming meeting to update and discuss the Drought Environmental Assessment and related grazing matters. Future Committee meetings are scheduled for the following dates and locations:
Dear Mr. Kornze: The Nevada Legislative Committee on Public Lands travels throughout Nevada during the 18 months between legislative sessions to listen to citizens’ concerns about public lands issues and to review federal and state land management policies with local elected officials, agency personnel, interest groups, and private organizations. In addition, the Committee actively maintains open communication with federal agency representatives, local government officials, and public land users. The Committee met with you in the past during a visit to Washington, D.C., and appreciated your insights and knowledge. The Committee held a meeting in Winnemucca on Monday, March 24. An agenda item included a presentation by Raul Morales, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), Deputy State Director. Mr. Morales provided an update and overview of the Drought Environmental Assessment currently being conducted in northern Nevada. As you can imagine, the Assessment and its application to grazing management is a cause of great concern among Nevada’s ranching community. During the public comment phase of the meeting, numerous members of the public voiced their concerns with regard to inconsistent and questionable decisions they believe are being made in the Battle Mountain District office. In many cases, local area ranchers believe they have been treated unfairly by Battle Mountain District staff, specifically District Manager Doug Furtado. The Committee heard multiple examples of where Mr. Furtado reneged on agreements made between ranchers and BLM specialists on the ground. In other cases, the local ranchers noted that grazing decisions are being made with insufficient data, which results in poor management practices. Instead of working with ranchers to develop alternatives to continue grazing, Mr. Furtado appears inclined to apply prohibitive restrictions on grazing because it is easier to implement than an active management plan. The Committee urges the BLM to foster a more open and collaborative partnership with Nevada’s ranching community to ensure the future of grazing on public lands. Further, the Committee suggests the BLM provide more high level and responsive oversight and a timely mechanism to review the decisions and suspensions being made in the Battle Mountain District office. Nevada’s grazing permittees deserve assurances that the BLM Battle Mountain District office is not making decisions in a vacuum and that decisions are consistent with those in the surrounding districts. Your assistance in this endeavor will en-
Nevada Centennial Ranch and Farm Awards applications due June 1, 2014
SPARKS, Nev. – The Nevada Department of Agriculture is accepting applications for the 2014 Nevada Centennial Ranch and Farm Awards until June 1, 2014. To qualify as a Centennial Ranch or Farm, an applicant’s ranch or farm must have belonged to his or her families for at least 100 years and must be a working ranch or farm with a minimum of 160 acres or if it is less than 160 acres, it must have gross yearly sales of at least $1,000. Applicants may download the application at http://agri.nv.gov/Centennial_Awards/ and submit it to: Nevada Department of Agriculture, 405 S. 21st Street, Sparks, NV 89431. The Nevada Centennial Awards Program recognizes agricultural families who have owned and operated the same land for 100 years or more. Forty-seven families have now been inducted into the program that began in 2004. The awards program is sponsored by Nevada Agriculture license plate funds, Farm Bureau, Agricultural Foundation, Nevada Department of Agriculture, Cattlemen’s Association and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Visit http://agri.nv.gov/Centennial_Awards/ to learn more about the Nevada Centennial Awards program. www.progressiverancher.com
City
Date
Location
Tonopah
April 24
Tonopah Convention Center
Elko
June 12
Elko County Commission Chambers
Ely
August 1
Bristlecone Convention Center
Carson City
August 28
Legislative Building
To make arrangements to present at a future meeting of the Legislative Committee on Public Lands, please contact the Committee’s lead staff at: Mail: Jered M. McDonald Senior Research Analyst Nevada Legislative Committee on Public Lands 401 South Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701 Telephone: (775) 684-6825 Email: jeredmcdonald@lcb.state.nv.us Thank you for your kind consideration of this letter and your interest and involvement with Nevada’s Legislative Committee on Public Lands. Of course, please feel free to contact Mr. McDonald or me if you have any questions concerning the contents of this letter or the invitation to present at a future meeting. I can be reached by telephone at 702-361-8262 or by email at paul.aizley@asm.state.nv.us. Sincerely, Assemblyman Paul Aizley Chairman, Nevada’s Legislative Committee on Public Lands cc: Amy Lueders, State Director, BLM, DOI, Raul Morales, Deputy State Director, BLM, DOI
Paula Wright Memorial Scholarship
T
ogether with the family of the late Paula Wright, the Silver State Stampede Association would like to make known the availability of two scholarships: one for $1500 and one for $1000. The scholarships will be awarded to Elko County graduates, but entries are not limited to 2014 graduates. Any past graduate of an Elko County high school who is currently pursuing higher education is eligible to apply. Past recipients are also eligible. Paula touched the lives of literally thousands of people through her work and dedication to community service; thus, the scholarship will be awarded according to applicants’ extracurricular and community service activities as well as goal-setting and plans for the future. All applicants will submit a resume and essay that will be reviewed and scored by a panel of Paula’s family and friends. Winners must provide proof of enrollment at an institution of higher learning. Interested students can call Becky Lisle at 775-934-9201 or email paulawrightmemorial@hotmail.com (email preferred) for more information and application materials. Interested individuals will be given an essay topic and the actual judging criteria to help with preparation. Deadline for resume and essay submissions will be JUNE 1, 2013. Entries can be dropped off or mailed to Paula Wright Memorial Scholarship, c/o JM Capriola’s at 500 Commercial Street, Elko, NV 89801. The scholarship will be awarded at the 2013 Silver State Stampede rodeo; monies will be paid directly to the winner’s designated institution of higher learning.
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 11
Nevada Food and Agriculture Exports Hit Record Levels Nevada’s food and agricultural exports in 2013 reached a milestone with sales surpassing 2012’s export sales by $19.5 million. Export sales in 2012 were $117.4 million while 2013 exports were $137 million making for a 17 percent increase in sales between the two years. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, for every $181,000 in export sales, one job is created and pays 17 percent better than a job not associated with exporting. In Nevada, that means 756 high end jobs were created in 2013 due to the state’s food and agriculture exports. “This is great news for Nevada’s food and agriculture industries,” said Jim Barbee, director of the Nevada Department of Agriculture. “We look forward to further growth and increased job creation throughout the sector.” Food and agriculture products are Nevada’s ninth largest export category followed by precious metals and stones. The top four markets for Nevada food and agriculture products in 2013 were Canada, China, Mexico and Japan. The majority of these exports – 94.8 percent – comprise 10 product categories that include cereals, flour and starches, beverages and spirits, grains and seed, fruits and vegetables, trees, plants and sugar-based products. State exports in 2013 for all industries totaled $8.7 billion, down from $10.26 billion in 2012. The largest decrease was seen in precious metals and stones, which could be explained by a drop in the price of gold. “Over the last decade, agriculture has been economically consistent, making it a very beneficial contributor to our state’s economy,” Barbee said. “We look forward to future agriculture export growth and its potential impact in Nevada.
Calling Cowboys & Cowgirls to compete in
Rhoads Ranch 2014 Colt Starting Competition
June 28-29, 2014 Trembath Place • Rhoads Ranch • Tuscarora, Nevada FMI: 775-934-1725 12 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
shammyr@rtci.net www.progressiverancher.com
Dahl Angus Ranch By Rachel Dahl
I
interrupted Jonathan Dahl in the middle of farming, which for a cattleman in Northern Nevada is all part of the territory. But he’s a talker, that one, and he was game to answer my questions and tell me some stories—all we were missing was a campfire, some buckaroos, and a branding iron. Or in Jonathan’s case some politicians, federal agency folks, and some regulations. A third generation Nevada rancher, his Dahl Angus Ranch is a member of the Department of Agriculture’s new Buy Nevada program. He and his wife Tami raise certified Angus cattle along with their own little herd of three children. Their cattle are a mixture of roughly 50% registered Black Angus and Simmental/Angus cows crossed with regular Black Angus bulls. He says this hearty European cow makes a good desert cow because it travels well, and drops light calves that wean heavy. Ever since Dahl was a kid, his dad ran Beefmaster/Angus cross and pure bread Beefmaster herds which they got away from about ten years ago. “It’s a typical ranch deal—you change your herd for other people,” said Dahl. “I hope we don’t change again.” He says the cows they run now do really well in a feedlot as well as on the range. Dahl is also serving as the President of the Elko County Farm Bureau and has been working for several years on a “Right to Ranch Ordinance that was recently passed by the Elko County Commission. He follows in his father’s footsteps who served as the Elko Farm Bureau President in the 1970’s. “My dad used to say he was serving because of me, he wanted me to stay in Farming and Ranching,” said Dahl. He recently bought the ranch in Starr Valley from his dad, whose father Jim Dahl had originally purchased in 1940. Jim’s brother, Harvey, my dad Joe’s father, bought the place
just north of them in Starr Valley on the day my dad was born in 1944. Back then dads didn’t hang around in the hospital waiting; they went out and bought a legacy. Jonathan Dahl appreciates those legacies left by our grandfathers and he wants to be in the same situation one day. That’s why he says participating in the Farm Bureau and talking to our government is so important. “I want to pass my ranch on to my kids, but all this regulation will prevent that.” He sees more and more regulations on a daily basis that impact his ability to run his ranch, and to farm. Dahl sites specifically the mounting environmental regulations out a myriad of choices when he talks about water, diesel fuel, equipment, and then explains just one piece of the substantial impacts by telling a story about his tractor. The 1996 version of the 145-horsepower tractor cost $60,000, while the 2008 model costs $125,000 for the exact tractor, horse-power and everything. The difference in price cannot be blamed on inflation, maintains Dahl, as he points to the differences in the construction tractors which are twelve years apart in age. “There are these exhaust valve sensors that prevent black smoke and carbon emissions. The 1996 tractor has 15 of those sensors and this 2008 tractor has 50.” What actually happens through these valves opening and closing, and controlling how the fluids and the exhaust performs to prevent too much smoke, is that the horsepower end up dropping down to about 135 HP. Everything about the building of the tractor is focused on making the engine, exhaust, fuel, and the filter systems more environmentally friendly—all to the cost of the farmer. “The funny thing about these regulations,” Dahl says, “is these, and all the new ones being attempted to put on the U.S., the truth is the U.S. is the greenest country there is.” He maintains that in this country we have the most environ-
mental regulation and the cleanest air, resulting in substantial, direct impacts to the industries that produce the most jobs and the best living. “If they want to make sure everyone lives forever, they better get the other countries on board.” According to Dahl, the work that the Farm Bureau does is important to help voice the common sense reality of what actually happens out on the farm and the ranch. “But we need younger people involved, they need to be more active, they need to go to the legislature and testify, and participate,” he said. “It’s much better when you go tell your own story.” Dahl sees the proposed legislation, what some are calling the Margin Tax, but more than likely will be referred to on the ballot as the “Education Initiative” as a “horrendous” problem. “This is going to kill producers,” he said. And again, urges those who will be affected to get involved, to participate in the process. A fan of the Buy Nevada program, Dahl sees the Department of Agriculture taking steps to support local producers and he commends the effort. The Dahl family has been raising beef in Nevada since 1940 and Dahl says “we grow the best cattle in the country and have been doing it for 74 years.” With the help of the Department of Agriculture, it’s just one more way producers like Dahl can get the word out about the quality of the industry in Nevada. “I really like this new program and I commend the Department of Ag and Jim Barbee especially, this is a great vision to do this.” If what they say in the end about Jonathan Dahl is, “he was always there for me, he always spoke for me, and he put his ass on the line for me,” Dahl says he will have lived the right kind of life. And at the end of the day, when the campfire stories are flowing, Dahl has all the passion that one man needs—and we all should have, to keep pushing for the ranching way of life.
Read The Progressive Rancher Online with your computer or mobile device! www.progressiverancher.com www.progressiverancher.com
Follow us at issuu.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 13
Idaho Cattle Association The Ranching Community
The Cattle Industry’s Goodwill Is Typified By Its Recent Generosity Shown To Owyhee Area Ranchers.
I
t is interesting to observe how adversity affects people. Nearly every day, there is news of natural or human-caused disasters from all corners of the world. In some places where hardships strike, there is blame, finger-pointing, and civil unrest. While in other areas the tragedies – though difficult to bear – create a unifying effect and bring to light a society’s innate desire to assist those in need. In our part of the world and in our culture, I think the latter of these two examples is more often the case, and adversity brings out the best in humanity. The cattle industry coming together to donate animals and financial support to the South Dakota ranchers who lost thousands of livestock this past fall in debilitating snowstorms is just one example of this. In our industry, we seek to be self-sufficient, but are the first to jump in and help when others are in trouble. Collectively, we are the backbone of our communities, be it through our service in the classroom – in the high school gym or rodeo arena – the 4-H clubs, at the county fair, in church groups, or on any one of the multitude of volunteer committees that serve our youth, our community, or our industry. The Beef Counts program, developed in part by ICA, wherein Idaho ranchers donate beef to the Idaho Food Bank, is further testament to our industry’s generosity and compassion. Fortunately, I have spent the majority of my life living in rural Idaho. However, I have also had the diversifying opportunity in the past to live in more urban settings. The differences are vast and the definition of what it means to be a neighbor is certainly relative.
RAISING EXPECTATIONS When you need to purchase livestock — or anything else for your ranch or farm — we’ll design a financing plan with terms, rates and payment options that work for you.
See what we can do for you.
I marvel at how, in small-town, middle-of-nowhere Idaho you can know the comings and goings, victories and hardships of a “neighbor” who lives miles away. Yet, as an urban dweller, you may not even know the first name of the person who lives within a few feet of you in the neighboring apartment. As I’m sure many of you have also experienced, my family has been the beneficiary of the generous nature of our society. Several years ago and right during the middle of summer hay season, my dad had an extended stay in the hospital following a heart attack. Without being asked, a neighboring rancher baled the swathed hay that lay in our field. And again on another more recent occurrence, when an outbuilding containing ranch supplies, food storage, and numerous other items of value went up in smoke, “neighbors” from as far as thirty miles away showed up on my parents’ doorstep with donated replacement items. This same attitude has manifested itself over and over again as ICA has undertaken the monumental effort to defend the rights of several Owyhee County ranching families to graze livestock on BLM lands. As we have repeatedly reported, we are in the middle of appealing over 68 BLM grazing decisions that would cut livestock numbers by up to 70%. The effect of these decisions to the locally-affected ranchers would be devastating, and if left to stand unopposed, similar decisions could take hold across the West. Since we have taken on this fight, I have been continually amazed at the generosity of our industry. We have had calls of concern from all around the state, and have received multiple voluntary cash donations from ranchers and local cattlemen’s associations across the state, miles away from Owyhee County and with no personal connection to those affected. Additionally, as of this date, three bull sales have voluntarily offered to donate and sell a bull or heifer to directly benefit the cause. Again, this is from people who have no direct stake in this fight, but have taken it upon themselves to help their neighbors in need. Because of the industry-wide support that we have received in our Owyhee litigation fight, we have, so far, been able to persist in preventing the called-for drastic reductions. That perseverance has begun to pay off. Our first victory in this case came last month when a judge ruled against the BLM on the first permit to be heard. (For more details about this recent win, see below.) A favorite quote of mine that often serves as a compass for me comes from Abraham Lincoln. Within days of the end of the Civil War, and amidst great strife, he gave his second inaugural address and said: “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in…” I do not compare the gravity of the civil war and the countless lives lost to our struggles today, but I do believe Lincoln’s words serve as a guide in persevering through challenges. I believe our industry takes this message to heart, and I am as proud as ever to be a part of it.
Judge Hands Down First Victory for Owyhee 68 Ranchers
Call 800.800.4865 today or visit AgLoan.com RENO • ELKO • FALLON A part of the Farm Credit system. Equal Opportunity Lender.
14 May/June 2014
The Idaho Cattle Association’s “Fight to Preserve the West” received its first victory Feb. 13, when the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) judge ruled in our favor on a summary judgment motion for one of the Group 1 allotments. The BLM’s grazing permit renewal decision was reversed by the court due to the agency’s refusal to consider the permittee’s application for range improvements on their allotments. The scheduled trial is now cancelled and the permit renewal decision is now remanded back to the BLM who must now issue a new decision based on the judge’s ruling. Although this ruling only applies to one of the 68 allotments, ICA and the permittees’ will now be able to advance this same argument in all of the other pending permit decisions appeals. BLM used the same rationale in those decisions on a multitude of issues so we have cause for optimism in our ability to halt the implementation of these faulty decisions.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Fumes FROM THE Farm by Hank Vogler
I
am sitting at my desk in my office in a “First Amendment Area”, which I may designate as a “Constitution Zone”, now that the federal over lords seem to pick and choose where the Constitution can apply and where it is subject to interpretation by the whims of an armed Banta rooster. This brings to mind why the second amendment was put in the constitution. I am sure of one thing, when you finally push the citizens to the brink of losing their hearth and home they will react with abandonment. When the old satellite countries of the Soviet Union had enough they faced their oppressors with little or no sophisticated weapons and prevailed. The folks in Tiananmen Square lay down in front of tanks. Government should serve the people and also protect the minority. The one lesson to be learned from the Bundy stand off is that the power of a photo device sheds the light on tyranny. Now that we have the chance to look at all the reasons for the standoff, maybe we will finally get the truth. I have never been able to run with the crowd in either direction. My Grand Parents always demanded that I do my own thinking and I am content walking alone in the right direction rather than following the Lemmings off a cliff so I can be popular. I can only hope that power is returned to the people. I am not ready to say Mr. Bundy is within his rights but it is quite apparent that the pervasive undertow of big brother is rampant. We have come to a crossroads in our society. We have compromised ourselves into insignificant serfs. I will admit that it is very expensive to hire lawyers every time the regulations are heaped upon your back and you try to figure out how to live with the new norm rather than stand your ground. One thing is for sure is that our oppressors know that, and can put you on the street by breaking you trying to live within the yolk of governance. As a young man, I watched the United States Fish and Wildlife Services change their policies of grazing on the Malheur Wildlife Refuge and take sixty two ranch families and if not completely destroy; but certainly effected their ability to feed and cloth and shelter their children was forever altered. It also destroyed thirty ranches that were on private land and were drowned out under Malheur Lake by actions of people that had a philosophy that if man did it was wrong. Many a ranch family had their hopes of a future dashed. Now the Refuge is a biological desert. Only about twenty families are allowed to graze with huge restrictions and the once crown jewel of the Pacific flyway has been reduced to weeds and predators. No one was held accountable and no one lost their government job, nor did any so called environmental group lose standing. I watched the timber industry in the Northwest with all of its good paying jobs and
middle class families destroyed in the name of the environment and the spotted owl. Now the forests are decadent and full of disease. Fires rage out of control and once again there appears to be no accountability for the destruction of these renewable natural resources. The human element has been demonized as though the feelings of an amoeba have sway over the human. No, we cannot in good conscience wreak havoc on the environment and not be held accountable but; when we find out that we are going in the wrong direction, we must change direction and get away from cutting off our noses to spite our face. My way or the highway is not the answer. Base line data, and measuring the results of our actions is the right way. We must constantly review the results of our actions. We can no longer waft philosophically about nature and pristine utopian ideals that make little or no scientific measurable results. Now, thirty years later the relentless fact-less scientists have the tool of the sage grouse, the pygmy rabbit, the lesser prairie chicken, or the one eyed one horned flying purple people eater as an excuse to take away property rights of the rural areas for their own money machines. Nevada ranches are based on water. Control the water and you were given the right to graze. The state of Nevada regulated who could and couldn’t graze. Multiple uses were to be honored and pre-existing rights recognized under the Taylor Grazing Act and NEPA and on and on. Property rights were to be preserved. Livestock ownership was regulated by the state of Nevada. Due process and the rule of law must be protected. The fiduciary duty of each county sheriff ruled supreme. For the state of Nevada to give away personal property is a circumvention of time honored state laws is wrong. You are issued a registered brand by the state not the federal government. It is the United “States” of America, not Washington D.C. and its satellite areas. Fifty-two ranchers had permits in Clark County. All but Mr. Bundy threw it in. The question remains are the desert tortoises flourishing? Is the paving of Clark County and housing developments infringing on sacred desert tortoise habitat. The number one predator on the tortoise and the sage grouse is the raven; but mans evil cows must go? The cow causes more damage than housing developments and paving machines? Or could it be, the tortoise is the tool to change the way eminent domain is interpreted? It is okay to build an eight-foot high pipeline through desert tortoise and sage grouse habitat? Solar farms, wind farms, pipelines seem to get little oversight but the evil rancher and his family must go? There is without a doubt fewer families engaged in feeding and clothing the American people than at any time in history, but the rancher must go? Ranchers are the true environmentalists and the real rare and endangered species. Hang and Rattle. Hank
Amodei Introduces Bill For Western States To Prevent Sage Grouse Endangered Species Listing
WASHINGTON, D.C. – In response to the potential Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing of the sage grouse, which looms over 11 Western states, including Nevada, Congressman Mark Amodei (NV-2) today introduced H.R. 4419, the Sage-Grouse and Endangered Species Conservation and Protection Act. The legislation would: 1) Provide states, local communities and the federal government with proactive, common sense resource management options when faced with potential ESA listings. 2) Establish a funding source for habitat management projects related to ESA listings. 3) Ensure that the federal government fulfills its ownership obligation for funding such habitat projects when habitat issues are the source of a proposed listing. The bill was drafted to address a dilemma faced by Nevada where 84 percent of the sage grouse habitat is owned by the federal government, yet federal land management agencies, which have requested almost no funding to carry out habitat preservation and restoration, attempt to pass the burden of funding on to the state and private landowners. “The number one threat to sage hen habitat in Nevada is wildland fire,” said Amodei. “Yet the federal land management agencies, who own the vast majority of the habitat, have not prioritized funding needed to undertake the necessary work to conserve the resource and prevent the ESA listing. Instead, they point fingers in an attempt to saddle state and private landowners with the responsibility for funding projects that are absolutely the responsibility of the federal government. This is nothing short of extortion and sadly adds another chapter to the war on the West story.” www.progressiverancher.com
The habitat management projects necessary to prevent ESA listings are also subject to federal regulations requiring a years-long National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. “Clearly, waiting for years for permission from yourself to do habitat preservation and restoration makes no sense,” said Amodei. The bill would require the federal government to fund its fair share of conservation work before listing a species. As a funding mechanism, the bill would utilize the federal government’s own vast inventory of lands, providing for the competitive, market-rate sale of small parcels — 160 acres or less — to pay for conservation measures. The funds would be distributed to federal/state councils in states with 33 percent federal land or more. In the event of a listing, the bill would require a more transparent review of the listed species, including cost benefit analysis and updated figures regarding habitat acres and species population. The legislation also extends protections to private land owners whose properties are designated as critical habitat. Any such designation that imposes restrictions on uses of land is deemed a regulatory taking of property for which fair-value compensation is required to be paid under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. “Federal land managers cannot continue to pretend that they have no financial responsibility to lead by example in protecting and restoring the vast majority of sage hen habitat they own in Nevada and the West,” said Amodei. “The threat to habitat is known. This bill would correct the attempt to make others pay for federal land habitat work and help to reverse the present treatment of the Western states.”
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 15
SALE REPORT
Sale Date: March 17, 2014 Despite the cold and windy day, a great crowd turned out for the “Quality Comes First” Bull sale at Malson Angus & Herefords, near Parma, Idaho. Both new and many repeat buyers were there to purchase yearling, fall, and two-year-old Angus and Hereford bulls. Cattle sold to seven states. The high-selling bull was Malsons Sure Deal 1a, the first son by Bushs Sure Deal 33 and the 2011 NWSS Champion, Malsons Savannah 27W. Spring Valley Angus, Lamoure, N.D. purchased the January 2013 son for $10,000. Another flushmate brother, Malsons Sure Deal 159a sold to Bar S Ranch in Paradise, Kan., for $7,000. Additional top sellers include the following:
Anipro & Xtraformance Feeds have created a
Value-Added Opportunity for Cow/Calf Producers The Premium Nutrition Network is… » Expanded marketing alternatives » Increased value of calf crops through enhanced health and nutrition » Assistance in building a reputable calf crop that is buyer-demanded every year
• Lot 7-Malsons Pow-Wow 225Z, born 9-13-12, sold to Tule Vista Ranch, Macdoel, Calif., for $6,500.
• Lot 60-Malsons Identity 120a, born 2-20-13, sold to Tule Vista Ranch, Macdoel, Calif., for $5,500.
• Lot 4-Malsons Cobra 229Z, born 9-20-12, sold to Wilde Ranches, Baker City, Ore., for $5,750.
• Lot 6-Malsons Rocky 239Z, born 10-1-12, sold to Wilde Ranches, Baker City, Ore., for $4,750.
• Lot 8-Malsons Consensus 245Z, born 10-10-12, sold to Kings River Ranch, Orovada, Nev., for $5,500.
Bridgeport Ran ch Rodeo Bridgeport, California
Centennial Livestock Arena
» Improved cow-herd health through improved supplementation strategies » An opportunity to gain feedyard close-out and carcass data To qualify for the Premium Nutrition Network, supplementation with an Anipro-approved mineral/vitamin supplement must begin within 75-days postpartum and must be fed until the calf is weaned.
62 Lots: Sale Gross-$196,450 Sale average-$3,169
July 4TH & 5TH
For details, or to enroll your calves, contact Jake Franke (806-683-3285) Jake@PremiumNutritionNetwork.com Great Place to Spend the Fourth of July!
PremiumNutritionNetwork.com
4 PERSON TEAMS COMPETE IN: BRONC RIDING •TEAM ROPING • STEER MUGGING • BRANDING RANCH HORSE CLASS • DOCTORING • COW STEALING LADIES JACKPOT STEER STOPPING • WSRRA SANCTIONED BOB BERG BUCKLES • CASH • PRIZES • FIREWORKS • PARADE CONTACT MARCUS BUNN FOR ENTRIES & INFORMATION: (559) 905 - 4416 or MKBUNN@QNET.COM
16 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
MARKET REPORT
Ship ’Em To
LLON A F
April 22, 2014
Head Sold this week: 395 Weight
TOP OFFERINGS Steer
300-400 222.00-242.00 400-500 214.00-235.00 500-600 209.00-224.00 600-700 186.00-211.00 700-800 146.50-172.00 800-900 144.00-153.00 Lite Holstein (under 600#) Heavy Holstein (over 600#)
Heifer
210.50-232.00 198.50-222.00 186.00-202.50 155.00-174.00 118.00-151.00 118.00-131.00 80.00-85.00 80.00-98.00
*Single, Small Framed or Plainer Cattle 15.00 to 30.00 less than top offerings
BUTCHER COWS & BULLS
Livestock Exchange, Inc. www.fallonlivestock.com
NG I C N U O N N A
2 SPECIAL SALES
NUAL N A 11 TH
Calf & Yearling Sales Tuesday, May 20th, 2014 AND
Tuesday, June 17th, 2014 t 1:00 PM a The market has been strong with lots of buyer demand. The butcher cow market is on all-time highs with feeder cows bringing premiums over slaughter prices. So if your feed is short, now may be a good time to cull some cows and save some feed. Ranchers, please have your cattle here by 10:00 a.m. on Tuesdays CALL TODAY AN CONSIGN YOUR GOOD CATTLE
Fallon Livestock Exchange, Inc. Sale Every Tuesday at 11:00 AM
Breakers (Fat Cows) Boners (Med Flesh) Cutters (Lean) Holstein Cows Butcher Bulls Shelly (Thin) Bulls Shelly Cutters (Thin) Young Feeder Cows Heiferettes Holstein Heiferettes Holstein Bulls Feeder Bulls Cutting Bulls Used Roping Steers Preg Tested Cows (3, 4, 5 yr. old solid mouth) Bred Helfers -(6 to 7 months bred) Pairs (solid mouth) 3-6 yrs Pairs (older)
90.00-100.00 101.00-116.00 70.00-85.00 79.00-105.00 95.00-119.50 75.00-85.00 20.00-40.00 90.00·108.00 95.00·120.00 77.00-105.00 90.00-116.50 75.00-85.00 95.00-120.00 72.00-80.00 NT NT NT NT
TODAY’S COWS Top Cow Top 10 Cows Top 50 Cows Top 100 Cows Top Butcher Bull Top Holstein Cows Top 10 Holstein Cows
Avg. Wt 1385 1397 1368 1246 1745 1335 1349
Avg. Cost 116.00 110.72 103.00 94.27 119.50 105.00 89.82
CALVES-SHEEP-GOATS-PIGS-HORSES
Beef Calves (HD) Dairy Calves Feeder Lambs Fat Lambs Ewes (CWT) Bucks (CWT) Small Goats (under 65 lbs.) (HD) Large Goats (over 70 lbs.) (HD) Weaner Pigs Feeder Pigs Top Hogs Butcher Sows Horses (under 1100 lbs.) Horses (over 1100 lbs.)
150.00-500.00 2.00-50.00 140.00-150.00 120.00-140.00 40.00-65.00 40.00-60.00 30.00-95.00 95.00-185.00 45.00-95.00 60.00-130.00 60.00-75.00 20.00-45.00 10.00-20.00 25.00-37.00
MARKET TREND: Feeder cattle were steady on same kind and quality depending on fill. The butcher cow and bull market is on all-time highs. Thin feeder cows are in High Demand. Fallon Livestock is a key market for the livestock industry, where buyers and sellers meet each week with a professional staff with over 50 years of experience in marketing livestock.
2055 Trento Lane • Fallon, Nevada 89406 • 775-867-2020
PLEASE call us ahead with your consignments. It helps us market your cattle. We talk to buyers all the time - they want to know what’s coming in. We are seeing good demand on weigh up cows & bulls. It sure makes a big difference on how they are sorted. Let our crew sort and class your cows. This will help you receive full market value for your cows.
For more marketing information, or to arrange trucking needs: Call Monte Bruck, Manager, at 775-426-8279
We have trucks available for your hauling needs, pasture to pasture or from your Ranch to the sale yard.
Selling All Classes of Livestock: • Cattle • Horses • Sheep • Goats • Pigs
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 17
Elko County Farm Bureau
Elko County Right-2-Ranch & Farm Ordinance Approved — Highway Sign Sponsors Welcome —
In an attempt to place a “speed bump” in the path of “nuisance lawsuits” aimed at agricultural businesses, activities and practices, work on the original Elko County Farm Bureau “Right to Ranch & Farm” proposal began with Past President Rama Paris and required the better part of almost four years, to research, write, and work with other effected interests such as Elko County Realtors due to disclosure provisions. Advice from legal minds was sought, more rewrites and materials were then presented before many Elko County Natural Resource Management Advisory Committee meetings, at least two Elko County Planning and Zoning Commission meetings, a Board of Realtors and Building Inspectors luncheon, and was finally approved to be passed on for consideration by the Elko County Board of Commissioners. Though the Elko County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved Elko County Farm Bureau’s proposal to place a Right to Ranch and Farm Ordinance in County Code in December 2012, two public readings were required before the measure could become law. Jonathan Dahl, Elko County Farm Bureau President said at that time, “The Elko County Farm Bureau has almost realized our objective,” as he was certain in 2012 there were, “Just a couple of more hurdles to cross and we can celebrate.” However, other more pressing matters like Sage Grouse and about two dozen other crises stalled the proposal on the County Commission “back burner” for an additional year. As a result of the entire process verbiage was chopped down from the original 8 page manuscript to one and one-half pages of tight, specific language worthy of an official ordinance. One glitch before final draft was an unintended omission of, “…aviaries; hatcheries;
PINENUT
LIVESTOCK SUPPLY INC. 263 Dorral Way Fallon, Nevada Reno Highway across from A&K Earth Movers
Stop by and see us, we look forward to seeing you!
PHONE: 775-423-5338 john@pinenutlivestocksupply.com
18 May/June 2014
poultry and egg production…”, but once the “fowl” language was reinserted, all systems were a “go”. Commissioner Charlie Myers motion to approve the proposal as an ordinance included placing signage at all County highway entrances and was unanimously approved, as well as unanimous approval for both First and Second Readings. “Our next project is to begin to find co-sponsors for the cost of producing and installing the signs, which is never [inexpensive]!” continued, Dahl. “We welcome all sponsorship donations toward this project for those so inclined, which are tax deductible as we are a non-profit, 501 (C) 5 Agricultural Organization.” “We may even consider a design contest [for the signs] if that fits in with Commission approval and highway rules and regulations... but we will have to check that out for sure.” An additional “educational” component also begins now to make people aware of the new ordinance which will include Elko County Farm Bureau’s preparation and distribution of informational brochures and other hand-outs about the Right To Ranch and Farm ordinance that will eventually be available at places such as the Elko County Administration, County Planning & Zoning Department, Elko Board of Realtors and Realty offices, Chamber of Commerce, etc. “Though we had several obstacles to overcome we were determined to never, never, never give up as this ordinance is extremely important to the agricultural interests and economic well-being of our producers and ultimately Elko County,” Dahl said. “Patience, persistence and an attitude of cooperation between all parties was ultimately successful.”
Elko County Proposes Resolution to Have Ravens Declared a Nuisance, Health Threat The Elko County Farm Bureau Board was approached regarding approval and support of a resolution proposed by Mr. Neil E. Whitmer MSc Geology, J.D., of Spring Creek, declaring the common raven a nuisance and threat to the health, safety and welfare of the people of Elko County. The Resolution proposal was approved unanimously by the Elko County Farm Bureau Executive Board. The County Farm Bureau signed copy was forwarded to the Elko County Board of Commissioners as that body had recently taken similar action. Elko County Farm Bureau also distributed copies of the Resolution to and for the consideration by other County Farm Bureaus for the following reasons: Agriculture is one of Nevada’s principal economic drivers, with cattle and calves the number one crop in revenue, representing roughly 35% of the total statewide sales of agricultural products. The potential listing of the Greater Sage Grouse as an Endangered Species by the US Fish & Wildlife Service, supported wholeheartedly and enforced by Nevada state and federal agencies, in Elko alone would place 71% of that County land base as prime Sage Grouse habitat, in essence running cattle off the range, restricting mining and further denying oil and gas leases on federal lands. It was felt that other Counties’ agricultural and other land based businesses probably face similar restrictions and resultant economic losses. Elko County estimates listing of the Greater Sage Grouse would cost that local economy hundreds of millions of dollars The Progressive Rancher
and thousands of jobs. This listing could put many family cattle operations out of business further financially devastating Nevada, especially rural ranching economies. Studies have shown the two major threats to Greater Sage Grouse populations are predation and devastation of habitat by wildfires. Predation of eggs and chicks accounts for from 82.5% to 94% of Sage Grouse nest failures. Of that ravens account for almost half (46.7%) of nest depredation, not to mention ravens preying on eggs and the hatchlings of song and other bird species and causing irreparable harm and/or pecking newborn calves and lambs to death. As scavengers, ravens have been known to carry and spread disease including West Nile Virus, fungi, and BSE (Mad Cow) disease posing serious health threats to wildlife, livestock and humans. Elko County Farm Bureau encourages other County Farm Bureau Boards and other groups and organizations to consider preparing, approving and delivering a similar resolution to local Boards of County Commissioners who might even consider approving a similar resolution of their own. Should there be questions or the need for more information about the Resolution Declaring the Common Raven a Nuisance and threat to the health, safety and welfare of the people of your County contact the Elko County Board of Commissioners at Elko County Administration headquarters, 571 Court Street, Elko, NV 89801, telephone number (775) 738-5398. www.progressiverancher.com
Elko County CattleWomen Host Annual Awards Banquet Submitted by Rachel Buzzetti, Treasurer
Recently the Elko County CattleWomen hosted their Annual Awards Banquet, where they recognized individuals for their dedication and loyalty as businessmen and members. The first award was the 2014 “Beef Businessman of the Year” and it was presented to Scott Ygoa of the Star Hotel. This award is given annually based on the nominees support of our industry. Ygoa works tirelessly to serve a delicious steak. He and his wife Tricia are long time Elko residents have built an impressive reputation, just check out their 4,100 likes on their Facebook page. Elko CattleWomen President, Angie Heguy President Angie Heguy, acknowlpresents the Beef Businessman of the Year edged during the presentation, “that Award to Scot Ygoa of the Star Hotel Basque fine businessmen like Scott make our efforts worthwhile.” She also Restaraunt & Steak House. thanked him for not only supporting our industry but for promoting it.” The second award was presented to Janice Connelley, as “Mother of the Year”. Janice became a dedicated CattleWoman early on in the Elko County Cowbelles organization, chairing numerous committees and events and later became president of the State Cattle-
Women. She faithfully attended meetings and in the 1990’s she was elected as President of the American National Cattlewomen. This award is given annually to a mother who has been involved with the ranch family business, school, church, community, Elko Cattlewomen, affiliates and overall family activities. In 1987 the Elko Cattlewomen presented Venna Ballard from Clover Valley with the first “Mother of the Year” Award. For the first time the Elko CattleWomen held their Annual Awards Banquet in conjunction Janice Connelley (left) receives the Mother with the Elko County Farm Buof the Year Award from Karen Winchell. reau members’ annual meeting. Johnathan Dahl of Starr Valley is This award is presented yearly by the Elko the Farm Bureau President and he CattleWomen. introduced to all of the attendees their new Executive Vice President, Clay McCaulley. The joint function was well attended and commented on by many about “…how nice it was to have a joint function.”
Public Invited to Soil Health Workshop
Elko, Nev.—The Northeast Elko Conservation District and U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) are hosting a Soil Health Workshop for interested public on Wednesday, May 28, 2014, from 9 a.m.-4 p.m. (PDT) at the Cottonwood Ranch, about 70 miles north of Wells, Nev. Presenters Brien Park, NRCS Soil Scientist, and Chuck Petersen, NRCS Rangeland Management Specialist, will provide interactive/hands-on topics for agricultural producers, including: Improve Nutrient Efficiency, Increase Water Infiltration, Reduce/Minimize Compaction, Reduce Input Costs, Maximize Net Profits, Increase Sustainability and Unlocking the Secrets of the Soil. Discussions will include the agricultural business benefits of soil health and how it can affect the bottom line. For example, they will explore how leaving more residual vegetative cover now (at the cost of additional baled hay) may pay dividends later in terms of increased soil organic matter, snow capture, water infiltration, root development and micro-organisms. A number of on-site investigations and associated discussions will occur on irrigated land and rangeland, so appropriate dress is recommended. Lunch will be provided by the Northeast Elko Conservation District. Interested members of the public are asked to RSVP as soon as possible, as seating may be limited. RSVP: contact the Northeast Elko Conservation District at 775738-8431 ext. 128 or Cottonwood Ranch at 775-472-0222 or 775-472-0453. As always, rooms and meals (at state rates) will be available at Cottonwood Ranch if desired. Please ason and call ahead for room reservations. 2213 N. 5th St. , Elko, NV 89801 Directions and map to Cottonwood 775-738-8811, 800-343-0077 Ranch can be found at: http://www.cottonwww.edwardjones.com woodguestranch.com
Call or Stop By!
Congratulations
Graduates
J
www.progressiverancher.com
B. L
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 19
C I N A G : g o l i p THE OR E T N E M MOVE “The Good, the Bad & the Ugly News…” by Stephanie Licht
W
e may know a bit more than three installments ago… but, have we discovered “the Truth” about “organics” and the “Organic Movement”? Is “the Truth”, like beauty, really in the eye and the individual perceptions of each “beholder” whether “delusional”, “committed to the cause” or “realist”? For all the anti-conventional agriculture and pro-organic propaganda, “the Truth” has been revealed for those who want to acknowledge it which is this: (1) There are some “good” points in favor; (2) there are some “bad” behaviors by some for profit, and also some “bad” news in opposition; and then, (3) there are some just plain “ugly” things going on that no one likes to hear, wants to admit or deal with because the trendy movement is socially and emotionally gratifying and very, very lucrative.
The Ugly News…
Throughout history American agriculture has been recognized and trusted to provide safe, affordable and plentiful food. Prior to the “organic naturalist” media blitz today, now wildly popular for casting aspersions on “conventional” agriculture, groceries were believed to be what they said they were because people were familiar with agrarian concepts, practices, technology and realities. Today standard agricultural methods and produce are relentlessly and resoundingly criticized, regardless of a critic’s basis in “fact”, actual knowledge or just personal beliefs, opinions or motives. Products honestly or dishonestly labeled “organic” are regularly priced at 150% to 200% more than the exact same traditional “non-organic” products. Unsuspecting customers, far removed from anything remotely agricultural, willingly pay premium “organic” prices because the cute vegetable cartoon label says “organic” or “natural”. All part of clever marketing specifically designed to confuse and mislead, these steer purchasers to allegedly “$uperior organic” products versus less costly but “despicable, ginormous corporate farm” produce. Considerable profit increases for few increases in production costs fosters cheating. False confidence is bolstered by consumers’ belief that laws and regulations governing “organic” production are being faithfully adhered to through strict government oversight. Yet, inspectors do not examine closed buildings for unapproved chemicals. There is the possibility some chemical spraying takes place at odd hours and less observable times and some “organic” certification applications have been concocted by savvy ghost writers. We know the official “certified organic” government seal has been overrun by many cleverly fabricated counterfeits. And on, and on…
The Bad News…
Much of the “bad” news related to “organics” has been clearly demonstrated in that “organic” products and produce: DOES allow and use pesticides and herbicides; IS NOT necessarily more nutritious or flavorful; DOES NOT come close to producing conventional crop yields: DOES NOT have less environmental and wildlife habitat degradation; government regulations and inspections DO NOT guarantee strict
20 May/June 2014
adherence to mandated organic principles; DO NOT come from small, local, bucolic, pristine little farms but instead are dominated by gargantuan food purveyors; WILL NOT result in a “…return to simpler times …”; and, WILL NOT and CANNOT HOPE to feed the planet or meet the expected food needs of the anticipated 9 billion people of 2050, a mere 36 years away. Therefore, “organics” ARE NOT the farming of the future world. Almost every continent across the globe has at some point experienced a period of famine. Consider biblical famine accounts across centuries; the Irish potato famine of 1740-1741 trapping 1 million people in a slow and horrible death. Even today – with all the 21st Century technology – some countries, especially in sub-Sahara Africa, continue to experience extreme cases of famine. Some individuals and groups are so deeply entrenched in the “organics” and “Organic Movement” ideology, one agronomist believes it, “A substitute for organized religion.” An unnamed cynic observed, “Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business and eventually degenerates into a racket…” Where do you suppose we are today?
Mot her Nature Will NOT Be Fooled…
Our natural world is filled with unpredictable events such as tornados, earthquakes, hurricanes, droughts, floods, hailstorms, blizzards, mudslides, wildfires, locusts, gophers, dandelions, crabgrass… events and intrusions beyond the control of man, natural influences having considerable effects on the fruits of one’s labors, especially in food production. Overnight a 2013 South Dakota blizzard killed tens of thousands of cattle and calves... ultimately reducing the pounds of beef going to market Fall 2014, and for years to come, and will definitely affect consumer prices for hamburger and other beef products and by-products – as well as devastating the economies of the towns, cities, counties and that state – affecting every consumer in some way. And guess what – “conventional” and “organic” cattle are all just as dead. Many who believed food production a simplistic operation were disappointed to discover ‘taint so, learned hard work and good intentions have crop failures for thousands of reasons, and Animal Shelters and Animal Rescue organizations have been overwhelmed with abandoned chickens. Few people have any comprehension, or want to admit, that when it comes to dealing with natural laws and then producing and bringing in a harvest, today’s 21st Century American farmer/rancher on average feeds themselves and their family and amazingly also feeds about 150 other people – 24/7, 365. Ask yourself, “What of significance have I done for the betterment of my family and 150 other people today?”
The Good News…
On a comparatively smaller scale, the production of true “organic” products and the “Organic Movement” have demonstrated some remarkable results and great
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Oldest Amateur Rodeo in Nevada – Since 1898 –
agricultural products. Farmers’ Markets are springing up in ever more local community centers. This latest “locavore” phenomenon brings together consumers who love the experiences and many truly “organic” farmers, several using “heritage” varieties to produce fresh foodstuffs and other “organic” commodities. These producers are to be commended for adherence to the principles intended to govern “organics” providing some level of guarantee customers are getting that for which they dearly pay. However, consumers must still thoroughly educate themselves through diligent research and come to almost personally know the producer and their product to be sure they are getting that for which they believe they are paying. However fabulous the products and fun the experience, most of these “organic” producers, a majority of home-grown “Community Supported Agriculture” (CSA) businesses, and many other related entities are by comparison very small operations where considerable amounts of time can be devoted to actively caring for and rearing relatively small crop harvests and are limited in the numbers of families they can serve by the size and scope of their operations. The unfortunate reality is all these small producers combined together cannot meet the nutritional and bulk food needs of our nation or the world, especially with regard to the enormous, predictable future food needs.
“Proof of t he Pudding is in t he Eat ing” – saying circa 1650
After all is said and done, should devotees of “organics” and the “Organic Movement” have superior methods and production, and unswervingly believe theirs really is the answer to today’s and future world food needs, now is a terrific time to put these deeply held “organic” beliefs to a very simple test. True disciples of “organics” and the “Organic Movement” could begin by having each of their own individual families’ plant, nurture, produce, harvest and preserve all the food that one family consumes in one entire year using the “organic” methods and practices they prefer. The second year these same families and their immediate neighbors could collaborate and cooperate to provide an entire year’s supply to meet all the food needs of that neighborhood. Similarly, the third year the neighborhoods could combine to provide a one year’s food supply for their entire local community. Thus, by the fourth year organically based, food producing communities across America could be self-sustaining. The fifth year these self-sustaining, food producing communities might then provide all the food needed to sustain each of the individual families… plus the other 150 people per family now supported by conventional agriculture… it would be even greater if perhaps in the process conventional agriculture could even discover something new. All viewpoints aside, there is traditional, common sense wisdom that applies to Country and City Cousins alike. It applies to everyone in every job that ever was, young or old, male or female, no matter ethnicity, urban or rural residence, or any other division or classification someone devises to define human groups or individuals. We come at last to one, irrefutable, overriding “Truth”: “Nothing is impossible if YOU don’t have to do it.”
lund pioneer days Lund, Nevada
July 24, 25 , 26 Thursday – July 24
2014
• Ranch Rodear Style Branding & Cutting/Corraling -
9:00 am — Added Money
• NEW — Cowdog Competition Contact Kathy Neal (775) 761-4933 for entries Entries close July 19th for Ranch and Rodeo
Friday – July 25 • Gymkhana 8:00 AM, Signups at 7:30 AM • Rodeo 5:00 PM -
-
Bull Riding ($1000 added), Sr. Barrels, Jr. Barrels, Team Roping, Saddle Bronc ($1000 added) , Calf Roping, Steer Riding, Women’s Breakaway WSRRA Sanctioned: Ranch Bronc (est. purse $5000), Ladies Steer Stopping (est. purse $2000) Call Neva Horsley (775) 238-5387 for entries
• Western Dance 9:00 PM
Saturday – July 26 • 5K Run, Parade, Pioneer Program, Bar-B-Que, Children’s Games, Adult Horseshoes, Cow Pasture Golf, Vendor Booths • Rodeo 5:00 • Fireworks
July 25 & 26 — Team Roping: Lanes 318 Arena, 9:00 AM
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 21
In the Mind of a Millennial, Part III By Jill Scofield, Nevada Beef Council
I
recently had the pleasure of representing the Nevada Beef Council at the Clark County Fair in Logandale. For four days in early April, tens of thousands of residents from the Las Vegas and other areas in southern Nevada (and even a few from Utah and other states) attended the fair. For this former ranch girl, it was a fun but long few days of connecting with consumers about something I hold dear: cattle and the beef industry. You might imagine I got all sorts of questions, and overheard a lot of great one-liners, during my time at the Clark County Fair. You can read about some of the questions I answered in this month’s Nevada Beef Council’s article. However, I thought I might also share some of the best questions and comments I overheard, just to give you a chuckle.
of a few of the issues covered with attendees – all generations, not just millennials – of the Clark County Fair.
Millennial Concerns
As we’ve covered in the past couple of articles on this subject, for the Nevada Beef Council, a special emphasis on millennials (born roughly between 1980 and 2000) is important due to this generation’s size (nearly 80 million strong), purchasing power, and their unfamiliarity and uncertainty of cooking with beef. I’m pleased to say that I talked to a lot of millennial parents during my time at the fair, and am proud that for the most part, they were pleasantly surprised to find that beef packs such a nutritional punch. Many of them picked up recipe books and our guides for cooking with beef, and voiced • Me: “What’s your favorite beef their excitement for trying new recipes that product?” Little girl: “Chicken!” are easy to prepare for their families. But alas, some were more hesitant. • “Is that a cow or a bull?” The price of beef was one factor com(Asked by a gentleman as municated by a lot of fair attendees as a the red angus cow next to deterrent to cooking with it. Some voiced me was nursing her calf.) concerns about things like antibiotics and hormones in cattle (see my answers to these • “What race is this cow?” in the NBC article). And some just weren’t confident in cooking with beef. • •“Wait, you have to kill Enter Kaley Sproul and Ashley Buckthat cow to eat it??” ingham, my helpers during the Clark County Fair. Kaley and Ashley are agriculOf course, when you have people who ture students at Great Basin College, and are unfamiliar with the realities of livestock Ashley is Nevada’s newest Beef Ambasagriculture get a first-hand view of where sador. Both are well-spoken, poised, and their food comes from, there are bound to overall great representatives of Nevada’s be a few surprises. Some attendees were a agricultural community. The future is little startled to see and touch a red angus bright! cow and her calf, only to look over to my But for the purposes of this article, booth and see a “Beef. It’s what’s for dinthe most important factor may be that they ner.” sign. I suppose the “before and after” are both millennials. (Granted, they are reality is a little harsh for some. Kaley Sproul (left) and Ashley Buckingham (right) at the 2014 Clark County Fair. younger millennials, whereas yours truly This is the very reason it’s so imporis an OLD millennial.) In between rushes tant to share with consumers more about of fairgoers chatting with us about cattle where their food comes from, and reassure them of the painstaking measures ranchers and beef producers take to ensure they deliver and beef, I asked Kaley and Ashley about their tendency to cook with beef. Their answers a high-quality, safe product to their dinner table. It helps consumers to know how ranchers aren’t all that surprising. Both mentioned the cost of beef as a major factor that makes it difficult to purchase care for their animals, and ensure humane and safe conditions for their cattle. These are just it. I’m sure many college students feel the same way. And with commodity prices increasing across the board, not just for our product, this will continue to be a concern for many. Confidence in preparing beef was also an issue, and the convenience and ease of cooking with other proteins like chicken was also cited. For Kaley specifically, not having a lot of experience cooking with beef makes her hesitant to purchase it. Ashley and Kaley represent the opinions of a lot of millennials. Even though they have more awareness of the agricultural world than your average millennial, they too face the same deterrents that drive others from purchasing beef. I shared with them some of the resources the NBC tries to make available to consumers throughout the state to help increase their beef knowledge and confidence. Offering recipes, easy-to-follow cooking tips, and guidelines for purchasing and preparing all cuts of beef are just a few of the things we do to ensure consumers aren’t hesitating to add more beef to their menus. SIRES I’ve talked a lot about the nutritional aspects of beef in previous articles, and that will • Sure Shot • Connealy Confidence 0100 • Net Present Value • T C Aberdeen 759 continue to be very important in our communication efforts. But clearly, highlighting the ways in which one can easily cook with beef, as well as ways to save on buying beef, are things we must continue to focus on with the millennial audience. 4P-ANGUS — Pius Nolz For more on the Nevada Beef Council, visit www.nevadabeef.org. For additional de775-752-3257 Evenings PO Box 292, Wells, Nevada 89835 tails about consumer or other industry research, visit www.MyBeefCheckoff.org.
F O R SA L E
8 LONG YEARLING ANGUS BULLS
22 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
J. B. Wh i te l e y OF A RANCH WIFE
Mountain City Brandings
W
e spent the weekend branding calves in Mountain City. TR and QT were pretty excited to go see Grandma and Grandpa. Mom and Dad were just happy to get to do something horseback and maybe rope something!
Branding in Mountain City is more about enjoying family and friends than it is about hard work. It’s about teaching the younger generation about traditions and their heritage. The neighbors still come and help, everyone takes a turn roping, and they still heel and drag calves to the fire. Dad’s teach their sons how to wrassle calves. The littlest guys who want to help pack the buckets, and when all the calves are branded, there is a huge meal for everyone to enjoy. Lots of stories are told (some harder to believe than others), and everyone enjoys themselves. I look forward to going home to brand every year.
Aunt Cara and I took turns ponying QT and PJ while we were gathering pairs. There is something to say about a good broke horse that is content to be led along while packing 2 four year olds that would both like to be steering and going different directions. A couple of arguments broke out, but no fists were thrown. Before we know it, both QT and PJ will be riding by themselves and roping calves.
While QT was very happy to have PJ to play with, TR couldn’t be bothered with “kid’s stuff.” He packed the buckets all day. TR didn’t want to be horseback this time around. He made it his job to pack the buckets for Uncle Casey who was cutting calves. I’m not sure who learned more, Uncle Casey or TR about anatomy!
Everyone has a specific job. Larry keeps the fire going. Gary brands all of the calves. Lee ear marks. Jim implants the steers, and the dogs watch.
We are so thankful that we live in a place where we can take our boys to work (or play) with us, doing the same things we did when we were kids, and that we have siblings, friends, and neighbors who are willing to teach them.
Attention Photographers! Eureka Nevada’s Fair is having a photography contest during their August Events. Look for all details & information in the July/August issue of The Progressive Rancher and be ready to enter your western-style digital shots! See you at the Fair. Eureka Fair Board www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 23
c 4-H Show
c Cutest Cowgirl/ Cowboy Contest
c Hearts of Gold Quilters
c Photo, Flower, Craft, Vegetable Shows
c Civil War Re-enactment
c Carnival
c Dutch Oven Cookoff
c Wine & Beer Tasting
c Magician
c Kids Activity Center
c Tractor & Farm Show Exhibit
c Barrel Race 4-H Show and Exhibits
c Discover Science Exhibit
c Plus Numerous Vendors
Fallon Ranch Rodeo Team Branding Team Doctoring Team Sorting Team Tying Working Ranch Horse Women’s Steer Stopping $500 Ranch Team
August 1st through 3,rd 2014 Churchill County Fairgrounds l Free Genera Admission
Fallon, Nevada
Live Music Daily
STEER STOPPING z BARREL RACE RANCH HAND RODEO www.churchillcountryfair.com
$30 Womens SS Jackpot
Fallon Ranch Rodeo
Stockdog Trial Go-Rounds: August 1st Finals August 3rd Three Classes
Open, Intermediate, & Nursery
Estimated Purse–$4500
First two places paid in go-round. All finalists paid.
Kids Goat Branding August 1st
Two age groups (6 and under) and (7 thru 12) Three man teams Limited to the first 20 PAID teams
Contact: Richard Allegre: (775) 423-5358
For More Information contact Billy Lewis (916)517-2232 or on fb Billy Lee Lewis or Gayle Hybarger (775)426-8123
24 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Range Plants for the Rancher By Paul T. Tueller, Ph.D., CRMC
F
Serviceberry
or this issue I discuss another important shrub, namely Serviceberry, Amelanchier alnifolia (Nutt.) Nutt. ex M. Roem. This plant is sometimes called Saskatoon serviceberry, western serviceberry, Utah service berry or June berry. Amelanchier shrubs are found in many areas of the United States. “Serviceberry”, originated with early Eastern settlers who used these very early spring flowers for burial services when the ground finally thawed enough to allow them to bury loved ones who had died in the winter. In some parts of its range, serviceberry grows to be a shrub some 15 to 20 feet tall. However, on the dry rocky slopes and sunny canyons in the Great Basin, it is usually only a few feet high and resembles a creeping bush more than an upright shrub although they often have an erect to spreading form growing to a height of 12’ with an equal width. This is certainly one of the major browse species across the northern half of the vast Western Range Region. Precipitation is low, with mean annual totals from 10 to 20 inches spread throughout the year. Plants grows best on coarse to medium well-drained soils, with a pH of 6.5 to 7.5. They require excellent drainage and moderate summer precipitation. This shrub is in the rose family (Rosaceae): the same family as apples, plums, and cherries. The origin of Amelanchier is uncertain although this is what the French call the plant, and alnifolia means alder-leafed. Serviceberry is a highly variable shrub, with smooth dark gray to reddish bark. It often propagates through underground stems and forms dense thickets. In autumn, the leaves turn yellowish- orange to reddish-brown. The flowers are white, showy and fragrant with linear petals that narrow toward the base. The flowers occur in leafy clusters at the tips of the branches. When the serviceberry is in bloom, it is indeed a beautiful shrub. Five narrow white petals are usually twisted to give a somewhat ragged appearance to each individual flower. White fragrant flowers, arranged in racemes (3-20 per cluster), appear from April through July. The fruits are purple to nearly black, berry-like pomes (applelike), with a white bloom (white powdery coating). The “berries” are sweet and edible but sometimes quite seedy. These ½” bluish-purple, juicy edible berries ripen in early summer. The versatile fruit may be used fresh or dried, cooked or raw. It was a common food source among Native Americans, who used the berries as a component of mincemeat. If you haven’t tasted service berry syrup on pancakes you haven’t experienced one of life’s great delicacies. Utah serviceberry reproduces from seeds or by sprouting from the root crown. In some years, Utah serviceberry is a prolific seed producer. The berries persist on tree unless removed by animals. Although many modern tastebuds consider the fruits too mealy and bittersweet, explorers and miners found them a welcome addition to their otherwise bland and limited food supplies. Early settlers learned to make fine jellies, jams, pies, and wines from the serviceberry. Many Indians of western North America held the plant in high esteem and the berries were a staple in their diet. Dried berries were pressed into small cakes, which were later added to stews and soups for extra flavoring. The dried berries were also pounded into dried meat for carrying on long trips. Leaves are arranged in an alternate fashion. They are simple, 1”-3” in length and have an oval to oblong shape with toothed edges, mostly on the upper half. During the summer the leaves are green www.progressiverancher.com
while in the fall they can turn a very pleasing red to yellow color. The berries provide food for mammals and birds, and the dense growth provides shelter. The shrub has good nutrient levels throughout the year. It is browsed mostly in spring when it provides good to excellent forage for cattle, goats, sheep, and wild ungulates. The berries are popular with wildlife. Serviceberry blossoms are attractive to bees and butterflies. Serviceberry is a very important species for mule deer in the Great Basin. The plant provides good browse for domestic sheep, domestic goats, mule deer, big horn sheep and elk. In the spring, serviceberry provides fair forage for cattle and good to excellent browse for domestic sheep. Serviceberry provides good forage late in winter and in early spring, because it leafs out and blooms earlier than many associated species. The fruit is preferred by many birds and can be an important winter food for birds since berries stay on the shrub throughout the winter. In Nevada, sage grouse eat the fruit. Serviceberry is an outstanding feed plant for wildlife furnishing both browse (leaves, buds, bark) and mast (the fruits). The small fruits are now eaten mainly by wild animals --pheasants, grouse, coyotes, porcupines and rabbits all feast on them. Such a wonderful shrub should be of interest to all of us.
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 25
Nevada’s Priority Agricultural Weeds:
Winter Annual Mustards Brad Schultz, Extension Educator, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, Winnemucca, Nevada.
W
inter annual mustards include many species. Some of the more common ones are: tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimum), flixweed (Descurainia sophia), pinnate tansymustard (Descurainia pinnata), wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis), and blue or purple mustard (Chorispora tenella). These plants typically occur on disturbed ground; including, roadsides and railways, utility line corridors, abandoned fields, ditch banks, and ephemeral streams. Winter annual mustards can also grow on range and pasture land, especially where improper grazing or vegetation management has reduced cover from desired perennial herbaceous species. Agronomic fields can also host dense infestations where cover from the crop is low by choice (e.g. orchards and vineyards); a management action (e.g., new seeding); harvest (e.g., small grain fields); or an infestation from disease, insects, or small mammals. Many mustard species contain chemicals toxic to cattle when they are ingested in large quantities. Blue mustard, while not toxic, can taint the taste of milk. Sheep and goats, however, can generally consume more forage from mustard species than can cattle.
Plant Biology
The winter annual mustards are cool season plants that complete their lifecycle in one growing season. Each plant originates from seed produced the previous growing season, but which germinates and grows in the current growing period. There are no buds on the roots which can facilitate regrowth if the above-ground portion of the plant is removed, or the roots are cut into small pieces. Some spe-
cies may regrow from buds on the root crown after removal of flowering stems and most of the leaves, if sufficient soil moisture is present. Seed germination may occur in the fall but most often happens in the late winter through mid to late spring (particularly tumble mustard) when temperatures are cool and soil moisture his high. Irrigation early in the growing season can promote high germination rates and establishment of many mustard plants before a crop becomes well established, which can dramatically reduce crop yield. As mustard seedlings grow the plant typically forms a basal rosette of leaves, with one or more erect flowering stems developing as the plant enters its’ reproductive phase. Depending upon the specific mustard species, plants may reach heights of 1.5 to 4 or more feet. The small seed size indicates that germination is best with very shallow to shallow burial. Tumble mustard seeds develop mucilage on the seed coat which facilitates germination of seed located on the surface of the soil. Plant growth is often rapid and most species have a short period between flowering and development of viable seed. For example, many mustard species can develop flowers within 30 days of seed germination, and blue mustard can develop viable seed ten days after the flowers open. Seed production has seldom been measured, but is reported as “high” for all species. Tumble mustard has produced as many as 1.5 million seeds per plant. The seed of most mustard species can remain viable for 10 years or longer. Flixweed is an exception, with few if any seeds surviving in the soil longer than three years. For most mustards, the seed falls near the parent plant.
Long range dispersal often occurs via overland water flow; contaminated soil that becomes attached to animals, vehicles, farm equipment, or even one’s shoes and clothing; movement of soil for construction purposes; and the movement of contaminated crops off-site. Tumble mustard also has adaptations for wind dispersal. The plant’s flowering stems typically break near the soil surface and can roll across the landscape, often for miles, dropping some of those 1.5 million seeds with each bounce along the entire distance.
Control Approaches Non-chemical There are no biological controls for any of the winter annual mustards. Most of the annual mustards were introduced from areas in Europe and Asia (pinnate tansymustard is an exception) and their control agents are likely to attack one or more of the many mustard species grown as crops throughout the United States. Mechanical removal of plants, whether done manually by hand or through cultivation with equipment, can be effective when it occurs before seed production. It is very effective at the seedling growth stage, unless soils are wet. Under wet conditions, the roots of seedlings that are not physically destroyed by the cultivation technique may continue to have good contact with the soil and extract moisture and nutrients, facilitating their survival of the treatment. Once an annual mustard plant has gone to seed, all treatments designed to prevent seed production will have to be applied for at least three years (flixweed) and often for about 10 years or longer
Bareground
Smll Grains
Corn
Alfalfa
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Bentazon
Bromoxynil-Octanoic acid ester
Basagran BashAzon
x
Broclean Buctril
Carfentrazone-ethyl
AimEW
x
Chlorsulfuron
Telar XP
x
Dicamba
Banvel Clarity
26 May/June 2014
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Potatoes
Fallow
Many
2,4-D
Mint
Representative Products
NonCrop
Active Ingredient
Range & Pasture
Table 1. Table 1. The list below identifies many (but not all) of the active ingredients and representative products known to control winter annual mustards, and the general sites or crops for which the active ingredient is labeled. Not all representative products, crops, or sites are listed. The information in this table should be used to determine potential products for use based upon a land owners specific circumstances. Product selection should occur only after the applicator has read all current product labels and identified the appropriate products for their specific situation. For some crops the application may be limited to pre-planting of the crop or spot treatments only. Many of the active ingredients listed in Table 1 are available in pre-mixed formulations with other products. These pre-mixed packages (products) are not listed in the table. A complete list of all active ingredients and products labeled to control annual mustards can be searched for at the CDMS (http://www.cdms.net/LabelsMsds/LMDefault.aspx?pd=7607&t=) and Greenbook (http:// www.greenbook.net/) websites. The order of chemicals below does not reflect any preference or efficacy. Check each potential product against the specific mustard species that compose your infestation. Across the spectrum of available materials, some species are controlled and others only suppressed (generally means no seed production). Also, whether the mustard plants are suppressed or controlled may depend upon whether the specific herbicide is applied pre- or post-emergence.
Selective
Soil Residual
x
Yes
No
x
x
Post-emergent: young plants Post-emergent to small actively growing plants. Greater rates can effectively treat plants to 8 inches tall
x
Yes
Little to none
x
Yes
No
Post-emergent: actively growing plants to 10 inches tall and 8 leaves
Yes, for labeled crops
No
Post-emergent to actively growing plants up to 4 inches tall
Yes
For sensitive crops
x
x
x
Growth Stage
x
The Progressive Rancher
Yes
Highly variable
Germinating seed or actively growing young plants Pre-emergent, or Post-emergent to rapidly growing young plants in 2-3 leaf stage or rosettes less than 2 inches wide www.progressiverancher.com
Flumioxazin
Chateau
x
Fluroxypyr
Starane Ultra Vista XRT
x
Glyphosate
Roundup and many others
Hexazinone
Velossa Velpar
Imazapic
Imazapic 2SL Plateau
Imazamox
Beyond Raptor
Imazapyr
Arsenal, Habitat
x
x
MCP Amine MCP Ester Shredder
x
x
MCPA
Metribuzin
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Picloram
Tordon 22K
x
x
x
x
Edict 2SC Vida
x
x
Matrix Resolve Solida
x
x
x
Thifensulfuron
Harmony SG Amber
x x
x
x
Rate dependent
Yes
Generally pre-emergent
Rate dependent
Yes
Pre-emergent, or Post-emergent to actively growing plants less than 4 inches tall
Yes
Short
No
No
Post-emergent: seedlings to early growth
Yes
Yes
Pre-emergent or post-emergent to actively growing weeds less than 2 inches tall or wide
Yes
Yes
Pre- or post-emergent
Yes
Yes
Post-emergent: actively growing plant up to 3 inches tall
No
Yes
Pre- or post-emergent
Yes
Days to 6 months
Post-emergent during active growth before bud stage
Post emergent to small actively growing plants
Yes
Yes
Post-emergent to actively growing young plants
Yes
Yes
Pre-emergent
No
No
Post-emergent to actively growing plants less than 6 inches tall
Yes
Yes
Pre-emergent before winter or post-emergent to actively growing weeds less than 3 inches tall
x
Yes
Generally less than 1 year
x
x
Yes
Yes
x
x
Yes
Short
Post-emergent, actively growing plants to 4 inches tall, or rosettes less than 3 inches diameter
At lower rates
Yes
Post-emergent to young actively growing plants, and residual pre-emergence activity
x
Yes
Yes
Pre-emergent or post-emergent if tank-mixed with herbicides with post-emergent activity
x
Yes
Yes
Post-emergent to actively growing plants less than 6 inches tall. Some residual activity
Yes
Yes
Pre-emergent to early post-emergent on actively growing plants
Yes
None to days
Yes
Yes
x
x x
x
x
x
Growth Stage
Yes
x
x x
Soil Residual
Yes
Princep Simazine
Maverick Outrider
x
x
Peak
Sulfosulfuron
x
Selective
Pre-emergent or post-emergent when mustard is less than 2 inches tall or wide. Pre or post application is crop specific
Beacon
Sharpen
x
x
x
x
x
x
Potatoes
Alfalfa
x
Mint
Corn
x
x
Metribuzin Tricor
Gramoxone Parazone
Triasulfturon
x
x
x
Paraquat
Saflufenacil
x
x
x
Simazine
x
x
Solicam DF
Rimsulfuron
x
x
Norflurazon
Pyraflufen-ethyl
x
x
Ally XP, Escort, Patriot
Prosulfuron
x x
x
Metsulfuron- methyl
Primisulfuron-methyl
Bareground
Fallow
Diuron, Karmex DF
Smll Grains
Diuron
Representative Products
NonCrop
Active Ingredient
Range & Pasture
Table 1. Continued
x
x
x
x
x
x x
x
x
x
x
Post-emergent to actively growing plants 1-4 inches tall Post-emergent to actively growing plants 1-12 inches tall. Higher rates for taller plants
Post-emergent to small actively growing plants Post-emergent to weeds 4 inches tall or shorter. Soil residual will provide pre-emergent control
Listing a commercial herbicide does not imply an endorsement by the authors, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension or its personnel. Product names were used only for ease of reading, not endorsement. Herbicides should be selected for use based upon the active ingredient and the specific bio-environmental situation to which it will be applied. Product labels change often; therefore, applicators should always consult the current label prior to applying any herbicide. www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 27
to completely exhaust the seedbank. Because these plants reproduce from seed a dramatic reduction or elimination of the seedbank is essential for control of the weed. Mowing can be very effective if implemented after the plant has elevated the flowering stalks and the plants are at the bud to bloom stage. However, it must occur before seed production starts. For many species this can be a very short window of opportunity. Mowing should occur as close to the ground as possible and when the soil throughout the root zone is dry or drying and will remain dry after treatment. This dramatically reduces the potential for regrowth from any buds on the basal rosette. Plowing may bury the seed too deep for large scale germination to occur. Likewise, it may bring long-lived mustard seeds which were previously buried too deep to germinate back to the soil surface where they can germinate and continue the infestation. The ability to graze annual mustards is variable at best. Some species like pinnate tansy mustard are toxic and can cause death if consumed in large quantities. Others, such as the Sinapis species are palatable, but their consumption can result in gastric distress when large quantities are consumed. Blue mustard and tumble mustard can taint the milk or meat when they provide a large portion of the forage. Where grazing is being considered as a control method, sheep are a better suited animal than cattle. This occurs because sheep can consume more of the plant closer to the ground, and they suffer fewer adverse effects than cattle. Fire generally is not an effective control technique. First, some mustard species remain green and very succulent through the seed production stage, which makes carrying a fire difficult. Second, plant communities dominated by mus-
tards generally have light fuel loads which make carrying a fire difficult. Third, light and/or succulent fuels usually result in low intensity fires that do not kill most of the seed located on the plant, the soil surface, or especially seed buried at shallow depths. Fourth, if fire is the only control technique tool used, it often creates an optimal germination condition for seed that survives the fire. Mustard seed typically germinates best on moist bare-ground, with full sunlight. Targeted flaming, however, is useful to kill plants in the flowering or vegetative growth stages and prevent seed production. Mustards are an annual plant that reproduces only from seed, and seed from most species can survive 10 or more years; therefore, long-term control of seed production is essential to control the infestation. Like all weeds, long-term control and management of annual mustards will require the establishment of desired competitive vegetation. On harvested cropland, this entails a dense stand of the crop species capable of capturing most of the soil’s moisture and nutrients, but also the sunlight needed for plant growth. Fields left fallow or barren for long periods after the crop is harvested and which develop a large infestation of annual mustards, should be disked, tilled, flamed or treated with a burndown herbicide before the mustard plants produce seed to prevent establishment of a long-term seedbank. For rangeland and pasture, the key to preventing a mustard infestation is to maintain a dense and vigorous stand of desired perennial bunchgrasses and forbs, with deep and widespread root systems that out-compete annual mustards for soil resources. For a mustard infestation that has never produced seed, almost any control method that prevents all of the weed plants from going to seed will be successful. Just make sure
the treatment does not harm the non-target, desired plants that are needed on the site to reduce the risk of weeds becoming reestablished. Established infestations (i.e., those that have gone to seed one or more times) will be successfully managed most often with an integrated management program that uses a combination of mechanical, cultural, and chemical approaches. No single treatment will be successful long-term on a plant species which can reappear for a decade or more due to an established long-term seedbank. Chemical Control There are at least 29 active ingredients that control or suppress winter annual mustards (Table 1). These ingredients are packaged in many more formulations, both as a single active ingredient and prepackaged mixes with other active ingredients. Collectively, these products are labeled for just about any landscape setting or crop found in Nevada, and include various levels of selectivity for non-target species, different degrees and duration of soil activity, and preand post-emergent applications. For most post-emergent applications the general rule of thumb is that small actively growing plants are easier to control than large well established plants, or plants growing slowly due to cold weather, dry soil, and/or other stresses that slow growth. Herbicides that lack residual soil activity are unlikely to control new seedlings that emerge after an initial treatment. The seed of many annual mustard species can respond rapidly to environmental cues that promote germination; thus, multiple germination events are possible and each must be treated accordingly (mechanical, chemical or other method) if the soil does not contain an active ingredient capable of killing the new plant.
The Progressive Rancher Coloring Page
28 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Nevada Weed Management Association T
Advancing Nevada in the War on Invasive Species
he Nevada Weed Management Association (NWMA) was established in 1995 to help raise awareness about the expanding issue of invasive plant infestations in Nevada. Nineteen years after its inception, very few people even know this organization exists. During the 2013 Biennial NWMA Conference a new slate of officers was elected to the NWMA Board of Directors to carry the organization forward for the next two years. This group of individuals has decided to try to overhaul the organization and advance Nevada in the battle against invasive species. Nevada is the only remaining Western state without any form of invasive species control program coordinated or financed at the state level. Instead, any and all funding spent on invasive species control over the past 19 years has come from grant funding and private donations. While there are statutes in place addressing invasive species, there is only a single individual with the Nevada Department of Agriculture working on this issue. Our hodgepodge system has limped along and seen some successes across the state, but the negative impact of poor statewide coordination is becoming more apparent with each passing year. The NWMA Board has decided to take this concern to the Nevada Legislature and is going to spend the next year gearing up for the fight. Numerous ideas are being discussed about how to fund a statewide program and the Board welcomes any and all suggestions during this brainstorming process. Some thoughts to consider as we move forward are: • Nevada is 87 percent federally managed, but federal budgets are ever-shrinking and invasive species are not always a priority for the agencies.
www.progressiverancher.com
• Our vast public lands are a heavily-used playground for people coming from all over with OHVs, boats, and other recreational equipment. We also have two major north-south snowbird migration corridors, which bring thousands of RVs from Canada, Washington, Oregon, Montana and Idaho through our state on their way to Arizona and New Mexico in the fall and again on their way back home in the spring. These vehicles offer opportunities for invasive species from other states to hitchhike to Nevada. • Many invasives contribute to changes in the fire cycle resulting in ever-growing wild fire size and frequencies. • Lastly we are the driest state in the United States and invasive species consume precious water that could be better used keeping our native vegetation healthy and diverse.
Las Vegas and Clark County will be critical in this fight. Clark County is in the process of resurrecting their cooperative weed management area. NWMA is supporting this effort and helping the organizers in any way possible. Currently the NWMA Board is meeting every other month. If you would like to talk to NWMA about this issue please feel free to contact NWMA President Betsy Macfarlan at 775-289-7974 extension 1#. The other Board members are Vice President Nate Weber, Treasurer Paula Day, Secretary Joy Paterson, Trustee Daryl Riersgard, Trustee Michelle Langsdorf, and ad hoc members Robert Little, Jamie Greer, and Jake Tibbitts.
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 29
LookUP
Warning – Danger Ahead
by Pastor Diana Gonzalez
Ezekiel 33:1-6 — Again the word of the Lord came to me, saying, “Son of man, speak to the children of your people, and say to them: ‘When I bring the sword upon a land, and the people of the land take a man from their territory and make him their watchman, when he sees the sword coming upon the land, if he blows the trumpet and warns the people, then whoever hears the sound of the trumpet and does not take warning, if the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be on his own head. He heard the sound of the trumpet, but did not take warning; his blood shall be upon himself. But he who takes warning will save his life. But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.’ NKJV I’ll never forget a sermon I heard in cowboy church at a high school rodeo back in the 1990’s. I don’t remember the preacher’s name, but I sure remember his message. He was at a high school rodeo, behind the bucking chutes. There was a young bull rider warming up, slapping himself and spinning around on an imaginary bull. The Lord impressed upon the preacher’s heart to go and pray with the young man. The preacher resisted the Lord’s leading, and only prayed off by himself without going to the young man. The young man got on his bull and was killed. Though that had been some years back, the preacher’s heart was still breaking, as he told his story through his tears, of not sharing the Good News of the saving power of Jesus Christ with this young man, before it was too late. Hosea 4:6 – My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. NKJV God said that! People, let’s wake up and heed God’s Word. We are here for such a very short time, and then we’re going to spend eternity in either one place or the other, heaven or hell, our choice. The knowledge of God’s Word, applied to our lives with Godly wisdom, can help us avoid unnecessary tragedies in our lives. And in our families and friends lives also. Proverbs 2:10-11 — When wisdom enters your heart, and knowledge is pleasant to your soul, discretion will preserve you; understanding will keep you. NKJV Proverbs 3:1-8 — My son, do not forget my law, but let your heart keep my commands; for length of days and long life and peace they will add to you. Let not mercy and truth forsake you; bind them around your neck, write them on the tablet of your heart, and so find favor and high esteem in the sight of God and man. Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your
You are invited to COWBOY CHURCH!
You are invited to COWBOY CHURCH!
1st Saturday of every month Standish, CA @ 6:00 p.m. Hwy. 395 /A3 — Standish 4-H Hall
3rd Saturday of every month Lovelock, NV @ 7:00 p.m. 1035 Cornell Ave. — Old Variety Store
Are you having a Rodeo or Livestock event? GIVE US A CALL. We would love to come to your event or ranch and host Cowboy Church for you.
Harmony Ranch Ministry 3767 Keyes Way Fallon, NV 89406
Tom J. Gonzalez | Diana J. Gonzalez, Pastor
30 May/June 2014
threecrossls@cccomm.net
(775) 867-3100 Cell (775) 426-1107
paths. Do not be wise in your own eyes; fear the Lord and depart from evil. It will be health to your flesh, and strength to your bones. NKJV Folks, evil and dangerous times are staring us right in the face, but we don’t need to be fearful if we’re faithful. Faithful to God and His Word, faithful to share the saving power of Jesus with our family and friends. Faithful to the urging of the Holy Spirit to pray with someone, and share the Godly knowledge you have. Even if all you know is John 3:16, that’s Good News for someone. Know the Word; share the Word. Proverbs 3:23-26 — Then you will walk safely in your way, and your foot will not stumble. When you lie down, you will not be afraid; yes, you will lie down and your sleep will be sweet. Do not be afraid of sudden terror, nor of trouble from the wicked when it comes; for the Lord will be your confidence, and will keep your foot from being caught. NKJV So where do you stand with the Lord? If you were to die today, where would you spend eternity? Are you sure? John 14:6 — Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” NKJV No other way! Romans 10:9, 13 — …if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” NKJV Simple. Easy. Humble yourself before the Lord, give Him your life and He will guide and keep you in all your ways. Now, be strong, be bold, go share the Gospel message with your loved ones who are lost and dying – before it’s too late. Acts 4:29-31 — Now, Lord, look on their threats, and grant to Your servants that with all boldness they may speak Your word, by stretching out Your hand to heal, and that signs and wonders may be done through the name of Your holy Servant Jesus.” And when they had prayed, the place where they were assembled together was shaken; and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and they spoke the word of God with boldness. NKJV Happy trails. May God richly bless you. We love you and would love to hear from you. If you would like someone to pray with, or just have a question, please give us a call at (775) 867-3100. ‘Til next time…. Scripture reading: Ezekiel 3:16-21 Ezekiel 33:1-20 Isaiah 57:15-19
Proverbs 4:20-27 Mark 16:15-18 Philippians 2:8-11
NORTE TRAILERS Call Mitch, to get your Norte Horse Trailer! Mitch Goicoechea
775-224-0905 hounddogs2010@hotmail
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 31
“Where Reserve Champions become Champions” Mud Volleyball
★ Dog Races
★ Parade
★ Rifle/Trap Shoot
July 1 – 5 st
★ Teen Dances
th
8 perfs. and FINALS
Winnemucca Events Complex Winnemucca, Nevada
Contact: Kathy Gonzalez: 775-217-2810 Jaime Dellera: 775-423-3739 Fax: 775-867-4400
★
Horse Trailers for All-Arounds
★
Website: ssir.us Funded in part by the : Winnemucca Convention & Visitors Authority
32 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Control M ethods
H
ello from the Humboldt Watershed CWMA! The HWCWMA was developed to address the invasive weed problem and subsequent decline in water quality within the entire 16,843 square mile watershed, which covers most of Northern Nevada. The primary function of HWCWMA has been to provide land managers, owners and weed control groups assistance in the areas of funding, agency and weed group coordination and cooperation. This month we would like to discuss control methods and how they may be used to target noxious weeds species that you might be trying to control on your property, but first we would like to explain what noxious weeds are and why they are a detriment to our Watershed. What Are Noxious Weeds? Generally, the term “noxious” weed is used to describe any plant that is non-native, unwanted and grows or spreads aggressively. Some are poisonous to humans and livestock and most will crowd out desirable and native vegetation. They can reduce crop yields, damage and destroy recreational opportunities, clog waterways and diminish land values. Early European settlers inadvertently brought weed seeds with them, perhaps in the hay they brought for their animals or in the dirt they used as ballast for their ships or even in their clothes or bedding. Some activities, such as clearing the land, opened up niches that created places for weeds to grow. Settlers also purposely brought plants from their “home country” to reseed areas, make dyes for clothing and use as ornamental plants. These plants have spread at an alarming rate because, unlike native species, there are few native insects, fungi or diseases to control their growth and spread in this country. What began as a handful of plants introduced in the 19th century now number in the hundreds of millions. Noxious weeds destroy wildlife habitat and forage, increase erosion and prevent recreational activities. Weeds have invaded approximately 17 million acres of public rangelands in the West – more than quadrupling their range from 1985 to 1995. Non-native invasive weeds across the US cost an estimated $26.4 billion per year in agricultural losses. Approximately 420,000 acres of grassland and national forests in the Pacific Northwest are reported to have been degraded by invasive weeds. Noxious weeds are a leading contributing cause of native species endangerment. Methods for controlling weeds range from pulling them by hand (making sure you pull up the roots), use of herbicides, proper watering and using fertilizers, (you can use a 2-inch layer of mulch in flower and shrub beds to help control weeds) and also biocontrol. Herbicides are important tools for controlling noxious weeds. It is important to understand the effects and limitations of those used for control of noxious weeds. Herbicides are categorized as selective or non-selective. Selective herbicides kill a specific type of plant, for example, 2,4-D kills only broadleaf plants. Herbicides are also selective based on the rate of which they are used. Non-selective herbicides such as Roundup will kill all plants that come into contact with it. See herbicide labels for complete information on herbicide use. Remember: the label is the law. Certain herbicides require licensing and training, and it is very important to follow all label and site restrictions when using these products. An herbicide is a tool that will create a weed-free window of opportunity. The success of a weed control regimen is
determined by the management strategies which are used following the application. A successful approach to eradicate a noxious weed infestation might include proper grazing practices, re-seeding, hand pulling, and other integrated control methods over the course of at least three years depending on the infestation size. For those who are concerned about the dangers of herbicide use, it is important to remember that these chemicals undergo stringent testing by the EPA, and they are designed to affect plant systems, not mammals. Most broadleaf herbicides are growth regulator products, meaning they accelerate cellular activity and respiration in broadleaf plants. When used according to label instructions, herbicides are very low in toxicity to fish, animals, and humans as well as the environment. Biological control involves the use of living organisms, such as animals or insects, to control a weed infestation, and attempts to recreate a balance of plant species with predators. Since many noxious weeds of most serious concern in rangeland are exotic species, they have few established natural predators. Bio-control research focuses on introduction of natural predators from the weed’s area of origin onto local plant populations. Bio-control methods generally suppress host weed populations, but will not contain or eradicate them; therefore containment with another method is a critical component of this type of management. It is most effective on dense weed infestations over large areas. These animals and insects are not adaptable to all sites; therefore evaluation must be used to find where they will be most effective. Please contact the Nevada Department of Agriculture, Jamie Greer or Robert Little at (775) 353-3601, for help with this type of management. As always, please notify the HWCWMA if you see any noxious weeds growing within the Humboldt River Watershed. We have an opportunity to stop invasive species from spreading if we act quickly and our staff can provide the property owner or appropriate public agency with site-specific treatment options for these plants. The HWCWMA also maps and monitors heavily infested sites in the watershed which allows the HWCWMA the ability to provide educational and financial assistance to land owners and groups in their management efforts, ultimately improving all of the qualities of the land and water in our watershed. The HWCWMA has also developed a website to serve as a clearinghouse for information on invasive weeds in the Humboldt Watershed. Our website (http://www.humboldtweedfree.org) contains fact sheets for state listed noxious weeds in Nevada, Board of Director’s information, funding partner’s links, and many more features including a detailed project proposal packet that you can print, fill out and mail back to us at your convenience. We are looking to expand our project area outside of the Humboldt River and always welcome new funding opportunities. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Andi Porreca, HWCWMA Coordinator at (775) 762-2636 or email her at aporreca@humboldtweedfree.org. You may also speak with Rhonda Heguy, HWCWMA Administrator at (775) 738-3085, email: hwcwma@gmail.com.
Photos Top to Bottom: Tamarisk Leaf Beetle, Digging Thistles; Goats Grazing; Digging Noxious Weed.
www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
Background Photo: Treated Hoary Cress
May/June 2014 33
SOCIETY FOR RANGE MANAGEMENT The History of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service in Nevada Charlie D. Clements, James A. Young and Robert R. Blank Range Scientist, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512, charlie.clements@ars.usda.gov Range Scientist US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (retired) Soil Scientist US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Until the mid-19th century, agriculture which reduced blood levels of calcium such in the western United States was largely that tetany occurred. extensive production of cattle, sheep, horses This plant species changed range reand mules. This was certainly true for Nesearch in the Intermountain Area for the vada where crop production was restricted next 50 years. Large death tallies of doto areas that could be irrigated. The severe mestic sheep bands caused by Halogeton winter of 1889-1890 nearly wiped out the became headline news in newspapers across range livestock industry in Nevada and the country, even featured in Life Magazine. livestock operators recognized they needed During World War II the herbicide irrigated hay production to carry their stock 2,4-D was developed with the idea of dethrough the winter months. foresting tropical islands where American During the late 1800’s, the farming inmarines were having a hard time dislodgdustry in the far western United States tried ing Japanese soldiers. It was never used to convince the Federal Government that it for that purpose, but 2,4-D became the was their responsibility to design, engineer, first modern herbicide to be widely used in and provide construction dollars for irrigacrop and pasture management in the United tion projects on arid lands. This was a radi- ARS has held numerous field tours for their stakeholders in an effort to build increased States. If properly applied, 2,4-D would kill cal view at the time and took decades before cooperation to better apply technology transfer efforts. Here Dr. Young addresses the Halogeton. Congress finally passed such legislation. The U. S. Department of Interior, Bustakeholders in a field tour in northern Nevada in 1994 concerning the suppression of Among the first of these projects was cheatgrass using long-lived perennial grasses. reau of Land Management (BLM), as well the Newlands Project on the Truckee and as State agencies treated thousands of acres Carson Rivers in western Nevada. The of Halogeton infested rangelands with 2,4project was named after Senator Newlands, from Nevada, who fought hard to fund these D applications. Halogeton, an annual, was easily killed, but the next year another crop of irrigation projects. Initial attempts to grow crops largely failed due to high soil salinity and Halogeton sprouted from seeds in the soil. To make things even worse, the herbicide also the presence of phytotoxic elements, such as boron, that are detrimental to crops. killed native shrubs. The “motto” of range weed control became, “Do not kill the weed unIn 1913, the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) established a laboratory in Fal- less you can replace it with something better.” Congress responded by funding the USDA, lon, Nevada to develop a management system for the newly irrigated soils. Drainage to Agricultural Research Service (ARS) to establish studies on the control of Halogeton and dispose of the salts leached from the soil was just as necessary as the ditches that brought the establishment of perennial forage plants on affected rangelands. water for irrigation. The USDA laboratory continued to do research until the 1930’s, when Dr. W. C. Robocker was assigned by ARS to work in Nevada by the late 1940’s. His it became under the control of the College of Agriculture, University of Nevada Reno. The research involved establishment of a long-lived perennial grass, crested wheatgrass, and Newlands Irrigation District became famous for the production of very high quality alfalfa successful suppression of Halogeton. Crested wheatgrass cultivars, however, at the time hay. Most of the hay was too expensive for range cattle operations and therefore was mar- were not adapted to salt affected soils in salt desert shrub environments. keted to the dairy industry in California. In the late 1950’s Dr. Robocker was replaced by Dr. R. A. Evans and Dr. R. E. Eckert In the 20th century, the Nevada range sheep industry was often referred to as “the poor and in 1965, range scientist, Dr. J. A. Young joined the team. Together these range scientists man’s road to success”. Domestic sheep wintered on lower elevation salt desert rangelands worked on a variety of Great Basin rangeland issues; but their biggest challenge was dealing browsing shrubs, such as winterfat (white sage), and obtained their water by licking snow with the highly invasive annual grass cheatgrass. and frost from the plants. Sheep were able to use vast areas of rangelands where cattle were Cheatgrass truncated secondary succession by outcompeting native perennials for restricted to the few natural springs and wells for stock water. limited moisture. The fine-textured, early maturing fuel also increased the chance, rate, The ability of domestic sheep to get their water source from licking snow and frost spread, and season of wildfires, which has has plagued Great Basin environments for more from plants set the stage for a major disaster in the range sheep industry throughout the than a half century. Dr. R. A. Evans reported that as little as four cheatgrass plants/ft² can Intermountain West. In November of 1942, there were numerous reports of death among out compete most competitive perennial grasses. domestic sheep bands in Nevada. Dr. C. H. Kennedy, Nevada State Veterinarian, found Dr. R. E. Eckert reported on the technologies of chemical and mechanical treatments 160 dead ewes on the Weeks Ranch in Clover Valley. He reported that a “weed was found” to decrease the cheatgrass seed banks. He additionally studied competition of emerging in the stomachs of the dead sheep, and sent the plant samples to Dr. C. E. Fleming, Range cheatgrass seedlings to allow perennial grass seedlings their opportunity to become estabScientist, College of Agriculture, University of Nevada Reno. lished, and suppress cheatgrass. After a great deal of research, Dr. Fleming identified the weed as Halogeton (HaloDr. J. A. Young reported on the greater ability of cheatgrass seed to acquire a dormangeton glomeratus) which was later determined to be native to the deserts of Central Asia cy, build persistent seed banks, and germinate at a wider range of constant and alternating where it is a relatively rare plant. The toxic compound was determined to be an oxalate, temperatures more than other desirable plant materials. Dr. J. A. Young also developed the The Society for Range Management (SRM) is “the professional society dedicated to supporting persons who work with rangelands and have a commitment to their sustainable use.” SRM’s members are ranchers, land managers, scientists, educators, students, conservationists – a diverse membership guided by a professional code of ethics and unified by a strong land ethic. This series of articles is dedicated to connecting the science of range management with the art, by applied science on the ground in Nevada. Articles are the opinion of the author and may not be an official position of SRM. Further information and a link to submit suggestions or questions are available at the Nevada Section website at http://www.ag.unr.edu/nsrm/. SRM’s main webpage is www. rangelands.org. We welcome your comments.
34 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Early research of ARS scientist’s helped control the toxic weed Halogeton and replace with more desirable vegetation. Here, is an ARS plot in eastern Nevada were winterfat is being experimented with following Halogeton control.
Another example of ARS field tour in which technology transfer is critical. Here, Dr. R. R. Blank addresses the stakeholders on the soil changes caused by tall whitetop invasions.
concept of the “Stand Renewal Process”, which describes that the present plant community is the result of past disturbances or lack of disturbances and that these communities are continually changing. These ARS scientists collectively discovered and reported on competition among species at the seedling stage, and experimented with a number of herbicides to aid in the control of cheatgrass and the establishment of perennial species. A Wildland Seed Laboratory was developed to test the germination potential of hundreds of native and exotic species exposed to typical seedbed temperatures of Great Basin seed bank environments. These researchers contributed so extensively to the management of Great Basin rangelands they became one of the leading range research units in the western United States. Dr. R. A. Evans and Dr. R. E. Eckert retired in 1986, and were replaced by Dr. R. R. Blank, soil scientist, to research the many soil questions limiting Great Basin environments including the effect of wildfire on soil properties. Dr. W. S. Longland, animal ecologist,
was hired to research the influence of granivorous rodents on seed and seedbed ecology in Great Basin environments. C. D. Clements was hired shortly thereafter and worked closely with Dr. J. A. Young on the rehabilitation of degraded Great Basin communities, continuing after Dr. Young’s retirement in 2007. The current USDA/ARS/Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit additionally employed Dr. K. A. Snyder, Eco-hydrologist, Dr. M. A. Weltz, Rangeland Management Specialist, and Dr. B. G. Rector, Entomologist. The Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit has produced more than 1,200 publications addressing a variety of ecological issues throughout the Great Basin. The Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit is directed to conduct research and provide applicable solutions to challenging issues confronting Great Basin rangeland ecosystems. The unit scientists provide management guidelines; develop new technologies, and practices for conserving and rehabilitating Great Basin rangelands, coupled with evaluating the effectiveness of these management actions.
4a
4b
The Great Basin Rangeland Research Unit conducts a lot of research on the rehabilitation of degraded Great Basin rangelands. This site burned in 1991, we seeded the site in 1992 to perennial grasses and antelope bitterbrush. The rehabilitation was slow to start, 1995 (4a) and became another success just years later, 2004 (4b). www.progressiverancher.com
The Progressive Rancher
May/June 2014 35
CHECKOFF NEWS: Representing Nevada’s Beef Community at the Clark County Fair
T
he Nevada Beef Council (NBC) recently joined over 70,000 others at the 2014 Clark County Fair in Logandale. The NBC’s manager of producer communications (and product of a northern Nevada ranching family) Jill Scofield was on hand to provide nutrition information, share recipes and tips for cooking with beef, answer questions about ranching and raising cattle, and educate consumers about many aspects of our industry. Throughout the weekend, thousands of fairgoers visited the NBC booth, learning more about America’s favorite protein. Even the biggest beef enthusiasts in the crowd (not to mention the skeptics) were surprised about a number of things we shared with them. Here are a few that topped the list.
Nevada Beef Council’s Jill Scofield with Ashley Buckingham, 2014 Nevada Beef Ambassador
Many of our favorite beef cuts are considered lean. Sure, most of us can name a few cuts of beef that we know are leaner than others, but many fairgoers were surprised to learn there are so many that meet government guidelines for lean, meaning they have less than 10 grams of total fat, 4.5 grams or less of saturated fat, and less than 95 milligrams of cholesterol per 3-ounce serving. What’s more, many were surprised to learn that the lean cuts represent some of our favorites: top sirloin, lean ground beef, flank steak, Tri-Tip roast and steak, tenderloin, among others. Knowing there are more lean options than ever before helps some consumers who are concerned about their fat intake feel even better about reaching for beef at the meat case.
GRILLED T-BONE STEAKS WITH BBQ RUB
W
ith spring in the air and summer on its heels, grilling season is about to swing into full gear! Enjoy this delicious recipe on a warm evening. And don’t forget to visit www.beefitswhatsfordinner.com for all sorts of other delicious beef recipes. Total Recipe Time: 25 minutes
Makes 4 servings
INGREDIENTS 1. 2 to 4 beef T-Bone or Porterhouse Steaks, cut 1 inch thick (about 2 to 4 pounds) 2. Salt BBQ RUB 1. 2 tablespoons chili powder 2. 2 tablespoons packed brown sugar 3. 1 tablespoon ground cumin 4. 2 teaspoons minced garlic 5. 2 teaspoons cider vinegar 6. 1 teaspoon Worcestershire sauce 7. 1/4 teaspoon ground red pepper INSTRUCTIONS 1. Combine BBQ Rub ingredients; press evenly onto beef steaks. 2. Place steaks on grid over medium, ash-covered coals. Grill, covered, 11 to 16 minutes (over medium heat on preheated gas grill, 15 to 19 minutes) for medium rare (145°F) to medium (160°F) doneness, turning occasionally. Remove bones and carve steaks into slices, if desired. Season with salt, as desired.
Nutritional Information Per Serving
To broil, place steaks on rack in broiler pan so surface of beef is 3 to 4 inches from heat. Broil 15 to 20 minutes for medium rare to medium doneness, turning once.
This recipe is an excellent source of niacin, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, iron and zinc; and a good source of selenium.
36 May/June 2014
275 calories; 11 g fat (4 g saturated fat; 5 g monounsaturated fat); 61 mg cholesterol; 189 mg sodium; 11 g carbohydrate; 1.3 g fiber; 3 g protein; 5.5 mg niacin; 0.4 mg vitamin B6; 2.4 mcg vitamin B12; 5.2 mg iron; 10.8 mcg selenium; 5.5 mg zinc.
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
NEVADA STALLION STAKES
News From the Nevada Beef Council One 3-ounce serving of beef offers 10 important nutrients. Most people know that beef is a good source of protein and iron, but there are many other important nutrients found in beef. What’s more, you get a good amount of your daily value of each nutrient from just three ounces of beef. • Protein – 48 percent daily value • B12 – 44 percent daily value • Selenium – 40 percent daily value • Zinc – 36 percent daily value
& Elko County NRCHA
August 23-24 ★ Elko, Nevada
Elko County NRCHA
SPECTACULAR “All classes have herd work”
• Niacin – 26 percent daily value
Judge: Darren Miller, AQHA • NRCHA AAA
• B6 – 22 percent daily value • Phosphorus – 19 percent daily value • Choline – 16 percent daily value • Iron – 12 percent daily value
Stallion Nomination Deadline: July 1st Nomination fee: $200.00 Late Nominations will be accepted until August 1st with an additional $100 late fee.
Nevada Beef Council Booth at the Clark County • Riboflavin – 10 Fair
percent daily value
When it comes to highquality protein, a growing body of evidence indicates that it plays an increasingly important role in muscle maintenance, weight management, and the prevention of chronic diseases such as sarcopenia, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Plus, research shows the iron, zinc and B vitamins found in beef play an essential role in developing and maintaining cognitive ability in children. All of this great information doesn’t even account for one factor, which was so eloquently stated by one fairgoer: “Most importantly, it’s delicious!” All beef is grass fed. Numerous attendees asked about the difference between grass-fed and grain-fed beef – and were surprised to learn that all beef is grass-fed for at least a certain duration. Explaining that the term “grass-fed beef” indicates whether cattle are finished on grass or hay, and that grain-finished beef is actually raised on grass up to a certain point, was eye-opening to many. Most consumers don’t realize that before they go to a feedlot for finishing, all cattle start their lives grazing, either in pasture or on open range. Cattle aren’t pumped full of antibiotics and hormones. One gentleman who came by the NBC booth looked at a graphic showing the many nutrients found in a serving of beef and quipped, “you forgot to add antibiotics and hormones.” Wasn’t it Mark Twain who said a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes? Well, that seems to be the case with the issue of antibiotic and hormone use in cattle. Many consumers are concerned about drugs that are administered to cattle. Having face-to-face conversations with people who express these concerns allows us to share that antibiotics are used with great care and only when absolutely needed. Ranchers have a vested interest in the health of their animals, as well as the safety of their product. They have no reason to overuse antibiotics but rather every reason to use them as selectively as possible. We also remind people that we live in a country that has some of the most stringent food safety guidelines on the planet. All drugs used to raise livestock are extensively tested and monitored, and each new product must go through dozens of studies before being approved. We had a great time sharing the story of Nevada’s beef community, answering questions, and helping people feel more confident than ever about buying and cooking with beef. For more on what the Nevada Beef Council is doing on your behalf, visit www.NevadaBeef.org, find us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter! www.progressiverancher.com
NEVADA STALLION STAKES
AGED EVENTS Futurity ★ Derby ★ Hackamore Two Reined / Green Bridle and Bridle Divisions NRCHA Rules Nevada Stallion Stakes Show Entry deadline: August 1 with late entries accepted to Aug 15th. ECNRCHA Show Entry Deadline Aug 22nd, Noon Late entries accepted up to show start time with penalties.
Entries forms available at www.elkocountyfair.com E-mail entries to elkocountyfair@hotmail.com Mail entries and payments to: Elko County Fair Board, PO Box 2067, Elko, NV 89803 For More Information contact: JJ Roemmich 775-397-2769 or elkocountyfair@hotmail.com
The Progressive Rancher
August 23 through September 1
www.elkocountyfair.com May/June 2014 37
38 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com
Financial Focus Pr esented by Ja son L a n d , Fin a n c ia l A d v is o r, E d wa rd J o n e s in E lk o , Ne v a da 2213 North 5 th S t re e t , S u it e A | 7 7 5 -7 3 8 -8 8 11
Take Steps To Protect Your Family Business T
here’s nothing more important in the world to you than your family. However, your family-owned business probably helps support your family. So, when it comes to protecting both your family and your business, you need to carefully consider your moves. As you know, you face plenty of challenges to keep your business running smoothly — but it can be even more difficult to pass the family business on to your children or other relatives. In fact, according to the Small Business Administration, only 33% of family owned businesses survive the transition from first generation ownership to the next generation. Why is it so hard to keep a family business intact? Sometimes, it’s because no one in the family is interested in running the business — but family businesses frequently disintegrate because of the lack of a succession plan. To create a succession plan, your first step — and possibly the most important one — is to collect the thoughts and preferences of family members on their future involvement with your business. It’s essential that you know who wants to really do the day-today work and who is capable. During these conversations, you’ll also want to discuss other key business-succession issues, such as the retirement goals and cash flow needs of retiring family owners, and the personal and financial goals of the next generation of management. In developing a plan for the future of your business, you will need to determine who will control and manage the business, and who will eventually own it. These decisions will depend on a variety of factors, such as the time horizon, goals and financial needs of the family members involved. Your succession plan could be based on a family limited partnership. Under this arrangement, you, as general partner, would maintain control over the day-to-day operation of your business, but, over time, you could gift or sell limited partnership shares to your family members. Eventually, you would also relinquish control of the business to whoever is going to run it. Another component of your succeswww.progressiverancher.com
sion plan might be a “buy-sell” agreement, which allows you to name the buyer for your business — such as one of your children — and establish methods to determine the sale price. Your child could then purchase a life insurance policy on your life and eventually use the proceeds to buy the business, according to the terms established in the buy-sell agreement. We’ve just skimmed the surface of techniques that might be used alone or in combination to carry out your business succession. The transfer can be complex, so you will certainly need to consult with your legal and financial professionals. It’s important that you fully understand the business and tax implications of any succession plan
as well as the financial impacts of a plan on all your family members. In any case, once you’ve created your succession plan, you’ll need to work with your legal advisor to put it in writing and communicate it clearly to all family members. Surprises are welcome in many parts of life — but not when it comes to transferring a family business. You want to leave your family a legacy. And if that legacy is the family business, do whatever it takes to pass it on in a manner that benefits everyone involved. This will take time and planning — but it can be well worth the effort. This article was written by Edward Jones for use by your local Edward Jones Financial Advisor.
Clover Valley Ranch: 2,489 Deeded Acres with over 500 acres water righted and irrigated with a gravity flow system from Stream flow and from several underground irrigation wells. Access on paved road and just 7 miles South of Wells, Nevada. One 3 bedroom 2 bath home. Price: $1,800,000. Ruby Valley: 1136 deeded acres of which approx. 129 acres have water rights. On paved State Rt.229. Only 45 minutes from Elko. Good summer range. Price: $700,000. Elko Co. 10,706 deeded with BLM grazing permit: These private sections are in the checkerboard area and are intermingled with public lands. The ranch has historically been a Spring Sheep range. The BLM permit is only 29% public lands. Price includes 50% of the mineral rights on all but 320 acres. Oil & Gas Lease might pay a big portion of the purchase! Price:$130/acre. Or $1,392,000. Considering adding the property below to it to make a year around unit. Elko Co. Humboldt River Property: 650 acres located between the Ryndon and Osino Exits on I-80. This property has over 300 acres of surface water rights out of the Humboldt River. The BLM permit for the 10,706 acres above is a short distance from this property with a stock driveway on this property. Price:$1.2 million. TENT MOUNTAIN RANCH: PENDING
INDIAN CREEK RANCH: SOLD
CLOVER VALLEY FARM: SOLD
KRENKA RANCH: SOLD
WE NEED MORE FARMS AND RANCHES TO SELL! For additional information on these properties go to: BOTTARIREALTY.COM
Paul D. Bottari, Broker
Work: 775-752-3040
paul@bottarirealty.com
1222 6th St., P.O. Box 368 Wells, NV 89835
Home: 775-752-3809 • Fax: 775-752-3021
•
www.bottarirealty.com
The Progressive Rancher
Allie Bear
Real Estate
Spec ializing in hunting, ranching, and horse properties Starr Valley Pasture Unique fenced 1,104 acres on Boulder Creek bordering U.S. Forest Service in Starr Valley, Nevada. Water-righted with nice meadows. $1,400,000
Recanzone Ranch Neat ranch in Paradise Valley. 900+ acres, 300 AUMs, right by town. Original Sandstone House. Easy access to Hinkey Summit & surrounding mountains. Includes Barn, Outbuildings and Corrals. $1,500,000
Davis Ranch Great little ranch north of Elko about 14 miles out. 157.19 acres. Fenced, cross fenced, large barn, stalls, tack room, corrals, round pen, arena. 3 Bedroom / 2 bath home with covered deck, 4-car garage.
Flying M Ranch Great ranch! Just minutes from I-80 (Imlay, NV) & not far from Winnemucca. Approx. 23,000 acres of deeded ground with more than 23 miles on the river. Winter outsideno feeding. One of the oldest water rights along the river. $15,000,000
J and M Farm Very nice farm just minutes from Battle Mountain, Nevada. 169 acres of which 130 are in production. Feedlot, corrals, new shop & equipment shed. New 3 bed, 2 bath mobile with mature landscape.
J M Farm (Winnemucca) 58 acre well maintained farm just 3 miles from downtown Winnemucca. Approx. 43 acres planted in alfalfa/ grass mix. Water rights included in sale. Includes two homes, mature landscaping, several outbuildings, barn and horse corrals. Farm equipment will be negotiated with sale. $780,000
Sherman Hills Ranch 1,259.51 acre Private Ranch in Osino, close to Elko, Nevada with year round creek through the property. Great views! Three large pastures, fenced and cross fenced. Garage, shop, corrals. Permanent manuf. home. Open floor plan with 2 bed / 2 bath. $1,500,000
View comple listings at:
www.ARanchBroker.com
775-738-8535 Allie Bear, Broker/Realtor 775-777-6416
May/June 2014 39
PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit # 3280 Salt Lake City, UT 40 May/June 2014
The Progressive Rancher
www.progressiverancher.com