“The process of collective bargaining cannot be transplanted into the public service.” ‘Why Should the State Keep challenges of running a membership organization—unless you are a government union in Oklahoma. In that case, the state has volunteered to collect your dues for you. State government and state taxpayers subsidize the dues collection service that supports both the OEA and NEA. While supporting private organizations generally is outside of the proper role of government, supporting a political agenda is clearly improper. The NEA and OEA are free to lobby for their views and to solicit for members and contributions; the state should neither interfere with nor support those efforts. Oklahoma needs to get out of the business of collecting money from worker paychecks for any outside groups by repealing the law that granted this special privilege. Collective Bargaining President Franklin Roosevelt, an advocate for private-sector unions, nevertheless warned “the process of collective bargaining … cannot be transplanted into the public service.” Requiring “collective bargaining” forces employers to negotiate with union executives over pay, benefits, and conditions for workers. In Oklahoma, just a few government agencies, like school districts, are required to bargain this way with unions. In most of government, elected officials are able to make decisions about how to operate. In a thoughtful letter to a labor leader, President Roosevelt explained that government officials cannot bargain like a private business owner. In government, “the employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws,” he wrote. A business owner can fully represent his or her interests,
but one or a few government officials cannot really represent the entire public in negotiating contracts. Put more simply, business owners negotiate over their own future profits. Government officials negotiate over other people’s money. And while businesses have a bottom line, that line in government is fuzzy at best. Worst of all, labor unions often invest heavily in influencing who sits at the other side of the bargaining table. In the worst examples—places like Detroit or the state of Illinois—collective bargaining has become a process where union officials and their elected political allies simply divvy up the spoils. The average American private-sector worker is not represented by a union, many by their own choice. Workers at a Volkswagen plant in Tennessee voted earlier this year not to unionize. When Wisconsin and Michigan workers were given more control over whether or not to belong to a union, many got out. All workers should (and do) have the freedom to join political organizations. Yet government should not be used by special interests to artificially increase the power of those political organizations. Government employers should not be required to “bargain” with private special interests over how government workplaces will operate. Voters elect officials to make these decisions. Taking the decisions away from elected representatives and boosting the power of private special interests is not just unnecessary. As President Roosevelt pointed out, it is undemocratic.
Watch a video interview with Trent England at ocpathink.org/videos.
Propping Up the Unions?’ Introducing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker at an OCPA dinner in 2012, Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin dubbed him “a profile in courage.” She’s right. And with courageous leadership, conservative policy victories are possible. “For years, public employee unions have depended on government to provide automatic payroll deductions for dues,” The Oklahoman has noted. “So what happens when dues payment becomes voluntary? Membership plummets.” When Wisconsin ended automatic deductions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees lost over half its membership. We hope Oklahoma lawmakers take note and end automatic deductions for all public sector unions. The failure to pay dues indicates government workers don’t see much value in union membership. So why should the state keep propping up the unions? Indeed, why should lawmakers continue to use your tax dollars to prop up a declining labor union (OEA active members are down 18.5 percent in the last four years), a labor union which in 2006 sued those very lawmakers and then spent millions of dollars in the SQ 744 campaign telling their constituents how greedy and deceptive they are? And speaking of profiles in courage, another OCPA dinner speaker—former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels—has suggested that public-sector unions should be abolished altogether. —Editor
www.ocpathink.org www.ocpathink.org
55