2011 NAU Volleyball Media Guide

Page 43

2010 BIG SKY REVIEW FINAL 2010 BIG SKY CONFERENCE STANDINGS Portland State*$# Northern Colorado* Idaho State* Montana* Sacramento State Eastern Washington Northern Arizona Montana State Weber State

BIG SKY MATCHES W L Pct. 14 2 .875 14 2 .875 9 7 .562 9 7 .562 8 8 .500 7 9 .438 6 10 .375 3 13 .188 2 14 .125

$Regular-season champion, Tournament Host *Conference tournament qualifier

Sets 45-18 46-19 37-30 33-26 29-36 28-36 24-36 15-33 16-44

H 8-0 6-1 6-2 6-2 7-1 6-2 4-4 2-7 1-7

A 6-2 8-1 3-5 3-5 1-7 1-7 2-6 1-6 1-7

ALL MATCHES W L 21 9 24 7 18 13 13 15 15 17 8 19 10 16 10 19 4 27

Pct. .793 .704 .600 .481 .469 .296 .385 .345 .129

Sets 69-47 78-41 69-54 52-54 54-59 39-59 42-53 38-60 28-83

H 11-2 12-2 8-2 8-4 10-3 6-3 7-4 4-6 1-10

A 7-5 8-4 4-10 3-8 3-10 1-13 2-8 3-10 1-13

N 3-2 4-1 6-1 2-3 2-4 1-3 1-4 3-3 2-4

3ST 8-4 10-2 8-2 7-6 6-7 4-8 3-10 3-11 2-14

4ST 8-2 6-2 10-5 3-5 2-6 2-5 5-3 4-6 2-9

5ST 5-5 6-3 1-6 2-3 7-5 2-5 2-3 2-1 1-3

Stk. L1 L1 L3 L1 L2 W1 L1 L9 W1

#Conference tournament champion, NCAA participant

TEAM STATISTICS (ALL MATCHES) HITTING PERCENTAGE Pct. 1. Northern Colorado ...................250 2. Portland State...........................222 3. Idaho State ...............................217 4. Montana ...................................169 5. acramento State .......................167 6. Montana State .........................164 7. Northern Arizona ...................162 8. Eastern Washington .................157 9. Weber State .............................148

ASSISTS PER SET Avg 1. Northern Colorado ................12.92 2. Portland State........................12.65 3. Idaho State ............................12.14 4. Sacramento State ..................11.09 5. Northern Arizona ................11.04 6. Eastern Washington ..............10.83 7. Montana ................................10.83 8. Montana State ......................10.67 9. Weber State ............................9.85

BLOCKS PER SET Avg 1. Montana ..................................2.67 2. Eastern Washington ................2.32 3. Sacramento State ....................2.31 4. Portland State..........................2.12 5. Northern Colorado ..................2.00 6. Idaho State ..............................1.96 7. Northern Arizona ..................1.70 8. Weber State ............................1.66 9. Montana State ........................1.61

OPPONENT HITTING PERCENT. Pct. 1. Northern Colorado ...................175 2. Portland State ..........................179 3. Eastern Washington .................186 4. Sacramento State .....................187 5. Idaho State ..............................193 6. Montana ...................................194 7. Northern Arizona....................202 8. Montana State .........................213 9. Weber State .............................258

KILLS PER SET Avg 1. Northern Colorado ................13.82 2. Portland State........................13.39 3. Idaho State ............................13.05 4. Montana ................................11.86 5. Sacramento State ..................11.76 6. Northern Arizona ................11.63 7. Eastern Washington ..............11.63 8. Montana State ......................11.48 9. Weber State ..........................10.73

SERVICE ACES PER SET Avg 1. Montana State ........................1.47 2. Sacramento State ....................1.45 3. Portland State..........................1.31 4. Northern Arizona ..................1.26 5. Idaho State ..............................1.18 6. Northern Colorado ..................1.17 7. Weber State ............................1.15 8. Eastern Washington ................0.96 9. Montana ..................................0.80

HITTING PERCENTAGE Pct. 1. LICHTENBERG, Ashley, NC .......399 2. ZIELKE, Lana, PSU .....................337 3. CARSON,Sarah, ISU...................308 4. ARNOLD, Kelley, NC .................296 5. QUICK, Brittany, UM .................272 6. THIBEAULT, Jaimie, UM.............268 7. NOBLE, Carissa, WSU ...............267 8. HAMILTON, Christie, PSU .........263 9. COVIARE, Chenoa, EWU ...........261 10. SMALL, Niki, NAU .................257

ASSISTS PER SET Avg 1. HUGHES, Marissa, NC............10.99 2. DALLMANN, Kelli, NAU ........10.00 3. JAMES, Kortney, UM................9.54 4. CHLATTER, Garyn, PSU ............8.86 5. LISSINNA, Kim, WSU ................7.47 6. CAMPBELL, Mackenzi, MSU ....6.42 7. NIEMEIER, Lindsay, EWU ........6.08 8. BROWN, Laney, EWU ..............5.40 9. APRILE, Katie, SAC ..................5.18

BLOCKS PER SET Avg 1. THIBEAULT, Jaimie, UM............1.47 2. COVIARE, Chenoa, EWU ..........1.23 3. QUICK, Brittany, UM ................1.07 4. ELSTON, Kelsey, SAC ................1.06 5. ZIELKE, Lana, PSU ....................0.99 6. CRENSHAW, Brittany, NC ........0.92 7. MOSS, Olivia, SAC....................0.91 8. LICHTENBERG, Ashley, NC ......0.90 9. CHEELEY, Chelsea, NAU ..........0.86 10. CARSON,Sarah, ISU................0.85

KILLS PER SET Avg 1. PHILLIPS, Whitney, PSU ..........4.75 2. ARNOLD, Kelley, NC ................3.76 3. THOMPSON-BROCK, H., ISU ....3.46 4. LICHTENBERG, Ashley, NC ......3.41 5. CURREY, Janelle, SAC ..............3.24 6. WRAY, Bethany, WSU ..............3.23 7. KIRBY, Eryn, SAC ......................3.18 8. SULLIVAN, Lexi, NAU..............3.13 9. THIBEAULT, Jaimie, UM............2.94 10. ALLEN, Rachelle, MSU ..........2.92

SERVICE ACES PER SET Avg 1. WRAY, Bethany, WSU ..............0.36 2. BAKER, Nicole, MSU ................0.35 3. MENEES, Breanne, SAC............0.33 PHILLIPS, Whitney, PSU ..........0.33 5. KORDIC, Sydney, SAC ..............0.30 6. GOTT, Anna, NAU ..................0.28 7. CURREY, Janelle, SAC ..............0.28 8. ELSTON, Kelsey, SAC ................0.25 9. NIEMEIER, Lindsay, EWU ........0.25 10. HUGHES, Marissa, NC............0.24

DIGS PER SET Avg 1. MENEES, Breanne, SAC............5.20 2. ARTERBURN, Amanda, NC ......4.94 3. BROWN, Brittney, UM ............4.79 4. GOTT, Anna, NAU ..................4.39 5. ALBISTON, Meghan, MSU........4.01 6. PETRONI, Lindsey, EWU ..........3.94 7. PROOST,Jenna, ISU ..................3.81 8. VILLALPANDO, Diana, PSU ......3.75 9. BLAKE, Nina, WSU ..................3.48 10. CURREY, Janelle, SAC ............3.47

DIGS PER SET Avg 1. Montana ................................16.67 2. Sacramento State ..................16.65 3. Portland State........................15.92 4. Eastern Washington ..............15.29 5. Northern Colorado ................15.26 6. Idaho State ............................14.89 7. Northern Arizona ................13.80 8. Montana State ......................13.78 9. Weber State ..........................11.62

INDIVIDUAL LEADERS (ALL MATCHES) POINTS Avg 1. PHILLIPS, Whitney, PSU ..........5.32 2. ARNOLD, Kelley, NC ................4.37 3. LICHTENBERG, Ashley, NC ......4.01 4. THIBEAULT, Jaimie, UM............3.94 5. THOMPSON-BROCK, H., ISU ....3.90 6. WRAY, Bethany, WSU ..............3.81 7. CURREY, Janelle, SAC ..............3.76 8. KIRBY, Eryn, SAC ......................3.52 9. SULLIVAN, Lexi, NAU..............3.42 10. ALLEN, Rachelle, MSU ..........3.32

42 2


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.