Oilsands Review June 2016

Page 1


HARNESS THE POWER OF ADVANCED HRSG TECHNOLOGY

The industry leader in Heat Recovery Steam Generators for gas turbines up to 30 MW, RENTECH offers a full range of HRSG systems to meet your toughest project requirements. We custom engineer our crossflow two-drum and waterwall designs to perform superbly in the most demanding applications and operating conditions. We master every detail to deliver elemental power for clients worldwide. HARNESS THE POWER WITH RENTECH.

HEAT RECOVERY STEAM GENERATORS WASTE HEAT BOILERS FIRED PACKAGED WATERTUBE BOILERS SPECIALTY BOILERS

WWW.RENTECHBOILERS.COM


Become a member of the Canadian Heavy Oil Association.

Brighter days ahead.

Events & Activities

Stay connected to colleagues, the latest market developments and innovation updates at the Canadian Heavy Oil Association.

MONTHLY TECHNICAL EVENTS

Support your oil and gas community today and sign up now!

Membership is easy at choa.ab.ca Phone: (403) 269-1755 I office@choa.ab.ca

∙ Technical Lunches ∙ Technical Beer & Chats. ANNUAL CONFERENCES ∙ Slugging It Out (Apr) ∙ Canadian Heavy Oil Conference (TBD).

SOCIAL EVENTS ∙ Curling Bonspiel (Apr) ∙ Stampede Lunch (Jul) ∙ Golf Tournament (Aug) ∙ Oktoberfest (Oct). CERTIFICATES AND WORKSHOPS ∙ Heavy Oil 101 ∙ Understanding the Heavy Oil Industry ∙ Industry Acumen Certificate.


E C I O H C R U YO N E E W BET Open-End Lease

Closed-End Lease

No KM Charges

Walk-Away

After Market Accessories

Low Risk

True Lifecycle Costs

Ease of Management

Find out more: www.jimpattisonlease.com


CONTENTS VOLUME 11 | NUMBER 3 | Q2 | 2016

DEPARTMENTS

07

From the editor Insights into oilsands trends

24

WORKING THE COASTS Cenovus hires 30-year marine veteran Claus Thornberg to manoeuvre midstream and get more crude overseas

29

WHO’S THE BOSS? Why it may be a matter of when, not if, Suncor will take over as operator of Syncrude DAVE S. CLARK

R.P. STASTNY

IN REVIEW

08 14 19

News

21

Throwback

Rounding up the latest oilsands news

Project news Project status and development progress

Eyes on the oilsands What people are saying about the industry in the media and around the world

Oilsands Review’s 10th anniversary series June 2006: Syncrude UE-1

53

Statistics

56

Transition

Taking a close look at the inputs and outputs of the oilsands industry

Pembina: A more environmentally responsible oilsands will be more competitive

59

Guest Column

62

Sector Watch

Watson: Being competitive means changing the way we work

Temporarily shutting in thermal wells may not be as harmful as you think

32 BUILT SO NICE, WE DID IT TWICE SAGD producers are looking to tackle costs with standardized designs for sustaining capital projects—but is it really possible? MELANIE COLLISON

38 A TASTE FOR MEDIUM Partial upgrading could add value to Alberta bitumen at a lower cost, but commercialization still has a long way to go R.P. STASTNY

TECH_SERIES : WATER

44 46 47 50

Improving mining water and land use through integrated, innovative systems The tailings technology enhancements that are already delivering results Pushing the limits of SAGD water treatment A new combustion technology may be able to low-cost retrofit oilsands steam generators to reduce GHGs

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 0 5



EDITORIAL EDITOR

Deborah Jaremko | djaremko@jwnenergy.com

FROM EDITOR THE

INSIGHTS INTO OILSANDS TRENDS

ASSISTANT EDITOR

Joseph Caouette | jcaouette@jwnenergy.com CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

Dave S. Clark, Melanie Collison, Simon Dyer, Carter Haydu, Pat Roche, Cal Watson, R.P. Stastny EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE MANAGER

Tracey Comeau | tcomeau@jwnenergy.com EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE

Laura Blackwood, Sarah Miller

CREATIVE CREATIVE SERVICES MANAGER

Tamara Polloway-Webb | tpwebb@jwnenergy.com CREATIVE LEAD

Cathlene Ozubko PRINT COORDINATOR

Janelle Johnson

GRAPHIC DESIGNER

Jeremy Seeman

CREATIVE SERVICES

Celia Hui, Teagan Zwierink

SALES SENIOR ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE

Diana Signorile SALES

Gerry Mayer, Paul Sheane, Blair Van Camp, Patrick Yee For advertising inquiries please contact adrequests@jwnenergy.com AD TRAFFIC COORDINATOR, MAGAZINES

Lorraine Ostapovich | atc@jwnenergy.com

CIRCULATION AND DISTRIBUTION MANAGER, PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION

Jackie Dupuis | jdupuis@jwnenergy.com

DIRECTORS PRESIDENT & CEO

Bill Whitelaw | bwhitelaw@jwnenergy.com SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT, ENERGY INTELLIGENCE

Bemal Mehta | bmehta@jwnenergy.com VICE-PRESIDENT, SALES OPERATIONS

Donovan Volk | dvolk@jwnenergy.com VICE-PRESIDENT, GLACIER BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT & EVENTS

Ian MacGillivray | imacgillivray@jwnenergy.com VICE-PRESIDENT, DIGITAL STRATEGIES

Gord Lindenberg | glindenberg@jwnenergy.com DIRECTOR, THE DAILY OIL BULLETIN & EDITORIAL PRODUCTS

Stephen Marsters | smarsters@jwnenergy.com

DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT & STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS

Chaz Osburn | cosburn@jwnenergy.com DIRECTOR, PRODUCTION

Audrey Sprinkle | asprinkle@jwnenergy.com

OFFICES CALGARY 2nd Flr-816 55 Avenue NE | Calgary, Alberta T2E 6Y4 Tel: 403.209.3500 | Toll-free: 1.800.387.2446 EDMONTON 220-9303 34 Avenue NW | Edmonton, Alberta T6E 5W8 Tel: 780.944.9333 | Toll-free: 1.800.563.2946

I was going to use this space to talk about the tenth anniversary of Oilsands Review, which I am proud to say this issue marks, but as I sit listening to ongoing coverage of the third day of one of the largest evacuations in Canadian history, I find it hard to concentrate on anything else. In the worst-case scenario, officials say that the entire community could be destroyed. I could not pray any more deeply that as you read this about two weeks from now, the worst-case scenario did not come true. Our magazine’s 10 years is half a blink in the lifespan of the amazing Fort McMurray community and the wonder of human innovation and continuous progress that is the oilsands industry. I will forever be happily humbled in its presence. Watching from 750 kilometres away as families drive through hellfire to get away from the oilsands forest has been terrifying and heartbreaking. The incredibly good news is that everyone has made it out safely, with the exception of two fatalities from a multi-vehicle crash south of the city during the evacuation. This is a testament to the courageous and dedicated work of the first responders. Thankfully, this is not a tragedy of human life— it looks like the road ahead for the Fort McMurray community will be difficult beyond words, but they have their lives and their families. What they have less and less of as the hours pass is the critical infrastructure required to have a comfortable home and successful community. As it stands, over 1,600 homes and

businesses have been destroyed. A new school has been lost and structures at the old airport have burned. This is a tragedy of loss of infrastructure, and there couldn’t be a worse place in Alberta for that to happen. For more than a decade, Wood Buffalo has been playing catch-up to put in place the essentials to provide not just a place to live but a comfortable home and community. They were starting to get ahead in the last couple of years, with the twinning of the highway, new neighbourhoods, roads, bridges, a new water treatment facility, the massive new multiplex and football/ baseball stadiums, and of course the brand new international airport. Right now, it’s still unclear how much of this infrastructure, if any, will survive. I heard an analyst on the news say that as long as the oilsands production facilities themselves aren’t damaged, this ferocious wildfire will not impact their long-term viability. I think that answer is too easy—even with the damage seen so far, the industry is going to have a hard time coming back from this. Ultimately, the oilsands comes down to people—houses and roads and blankets and families. If they don’t have a place to live, you don’t have an industry. Albertans, and Fort McMurrayites in particular, are tough and because of that this industry is strong. We will rebuild, even if we have to start from one giant pile of rubble, but it is going to hurt a lot along the way. DEBORAH JAREMKO

djaremko@jwnenergy.com @oilsandseditor

MEMBERSHIPS MEMBERSHIP RATE In Canada, 1 year $25 plus GST • International pricing available Single copies & back issues, $10 plus GST & $2.50 postage & handling

NEXT ISSUE

MEMBERSHIP INQUIRIES Telephone: 1.800.387.2446 Email: circulation@jwnenergy.com Online: jwnenergy.com ISSN 1912-5305 | © 2016 JWN. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is strictly prohibited without prior consent from the publisher. Publications Mail Agreement Number 40069240. If undeliverable, return to: Circulation Department, 2nd Flr-816 55 Avenue NE, Calgary, Alberta T2E 6Y4. Made in Canada. The opinions expressed by contributors to Oilsands Review may not represent the official views of the magazine. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the publisher does not assume any responsibility or liability for errors or omissions.

PROJECT ANALYTICS Benchmarking efficiency performance project-by-project

JWNENERGY.COM Oilsands Review is now part of jwnenergy.com! Sign up for our weekly oilsands e-news for magazine content and more.

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 0 7


New CanOils study shows SAGD is improving but LTO is still on top

Q 2 2 0 1 6 / / R O U N D I N G U P T H E L AT E S T O I L S A N D S N E W S

MEG ENERGY LAUNCHES REGULATORY PROCESS FOR NEW 160,000-BBL/D SAGD PROJECT In mid-April, MEG launched the regulatory process for a new phased 160,000-bbl/d SAGD project at May River near Conklin, south of Fort McMurray, by filing its proposed terms of reference with Alberta Environment and Parks. The first two phases would be 40,000 bbls/d each, followed by a third 80,000-bbl/d phase. Expected capital costs have not been disclosed. As an intermediate oilsands producer, it could be surprising that MEG would take this step in a sub-$50 WTI market. But it is evidence of what can be achieved in the oilsands with the right resource and strategy—MEG is in the unique position of not only successfully achieving production and maintaining ownership of a SAGD facility as a junior producer, it has also been very successful in improving performance and reducing costs. In the fourth quarter of 2015, MEG achieved record production of 83,500 bbls/d at its Christina Lake SAGD project (nameplate capacity is 60,000 bbls/d), as well as record low net operating costs of $8.52/bbl. That’s compared to an industry average of about $13/bbl. “Our operating performance throughout 2015 met or exceeded our targets,” MEG president and chief executive officer Bill McCaffrey said in announcing the company’s fourth-quarter results. “Our low cost structure is enabling MEG to weather the low commodity price environment seen over the past year.” Right now that low cost structure is largely attributable to MEG’s RISER program, which incorporates debottlenecking and brownfield expansion at the plant as well as infill drilling

and non-condensable gas co-injection in the reservoir. With results like that, it’s easy to see how MEG could be confident in its future in the oilsands. MEG spokesman Brad Bellows says about May River that, “We are several years out, but when I look at what we have accomplished at Christina Lake, we have learned a lot and refined our technologies, improving our efficiencies as we go, and we expect that process is going to be ongoing and that we can bring that knowledge and expertise to any new development.” The project life of the proposed May River project is approximately 25 years. A commercial project application is planned to be submitted to the Alberta Energy Regulator for review in late 2016. Construction is expected to start in 2019, followed by first steam in 2023. MEG says the project design includes steam generation, cogeneration, water treatment and recycling, bitumen treatment, sulphur recovery, multi-well production pads, steam delivery pipelines, product recovery pipelines, water source wells, waste-water disposal, construction and operations camp, and other secondary infrastructure.

08 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

P.17

MAY RIVER PROJECT

63

CONKLIN

881

FORT McMURRAY

EDMONTON

CALGARY

PHOTO: MEG ENERGY

IN REVIEW

Supply costs: SAGD vs. the Permian Basin


IN REVIEW

4/10 60 over

Barrels of crude the U.S. imported in 2015 that were from Canada

%

Recovery now expected from most SAGD well pads

$1.7 billion

Oilsands evaluation well permitting drops to decade low

Amount Husky will receive for the sale of a 65 per cent interest in certain heavy oil midstream infrastructure

Canada needs “urgent action” amidst largest capex drop on record

According to data collected by the Daily Oil Bulletin, a total of 58 oilsands evaluation wells were licensed during the first quarter of 2016, down from 117 permits over the first three months of 2015.

Q1 2015

Q1 2016

PHOTO: BP

CAPP is projecting a 62 per cent drop in overall Canadian oil and gas capital spending in 2016 compared to 2014. New data from the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) forecasts that capital spending in 2016 will decline by $50 billion, or 62 per cent, compared to 2014. CAPP says this is the largest two-year decline since it and its predecessor organizations started tracking this data in 1947. Total capital investment in the oil and natural gas sector is forecast to decline to $31 billion in 2016, down from a record $81 billion in 2014.

“Canada needs urgent action to remain an attractive market for oil and gas investment and to be competitive relative to other oil and natural gas producing jurisdictions,” says Tim McMillan, CAPP president and chief executive officer. CAPP says that this action includes the timely expansion of Canada’s pipeline network to deliver to more markets at home and abroad, along with the development of liquefied natural gas export facilities.

“Doing so would allow Canadians to earn full value for their resources and create economic activity that would otherwise be lost.” McMillan says, “The United States, our only customer and number one competitor, is certainly not standing still.... We as a country need a common effort to have a level playing field in North America. Doing so will help ensure Canada is not at a competitive disadvantage relative to the U.S.”

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 0 9


IN REVIEW

Suncor says that it will provide enhanced disclosure around carbon risk and its lobbying activities in its upcoming 2016 Report on Sustainability, to be issued in July. The move follows an announcement by sumofus.org that a resolution would be raised at Suncor’s annual general meeting to demand greater transparency around the company’s lobbying activities. The resolution asks Suncor to disclose payments it makes to lobbyists, trade associations, and grassroots campaigns to influence public policy. The company says that “regarding lobbying practices, Suncor will expand its disclosure by publishing its policy on lobbying and political donations, and list trade associations that lobby government to which Suncor pays membership dues of greater than $50,000 and $100,000 per year. Suncor will continue to disclose its political donations as has been done in the past.” The “enhanced disclosure” will also include further information about how the company is expected to succeed in a low-carbon future. “Suncor has a demonstrated track record of transparent reporting as evidenced by the disclosure we provide in our Report on Sustainability, and our recognition by the Carbon Disclosure Project [CDP] and the Dow Jones Sustainability Index,” says Steve Williams, Suncor’s president and chief executive officer. “We believe additional disclosure about the resilience of our business strategy in a transition to a low-carbon future benefits shareholders and stakeholders.” In a statement, Tim Smith of Walden Asset Management said that, “Global institutional investors concerned about climate change are increasingly urging oil and gas companies to review and disclose their lobbying aimed at influencing public policy on climate and the environment. Companies can play a positive role calling for legislation and regulation to address climate change, but often directly or through trade associations a company may be using its voice and funds to oppose climate action.”

10 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

Scientist: It’s a mistake to blame Athabasca River pollution on the oilsands

The Athabasca River flows into Lake Athabasca, shown here from the shores of Fort Chipewyan, where residents have long been concerned about water pollution. The general public has a “skewed perspective” of the level of disturbance that the oilsands industry is causing to the Athabasca River, says Jon Fennell, vice-president of geosciences and water security at Integrated Sustainability Consultants. “Contributions of natural constituents to the Athabasca River are not well understood, and arguably are not very well quantified either. Just because you measure something does not mean it has any significance or relevance. You need to know what the flux is and its quantity,” Fennell told

Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA) water conference in April. “The Athabasca River has literally carved all the way through the oilsands deposits, down into the Devonian carbonates underneath. All of that oilsand that was once there has been removed, eroded and reported downstream and deposited in the Peace-Athabasca delta. There is no surprise that you are picking up hydrocarbons and other trace elements in the delta, because it is deposited from erosion of the oilsands, and that is still going on today.”

He says that river pollution can be explained by many sources other than oilsands development. Municipal golf courses, storm-water drainage and other municipal sources impact the river system, he added, as can other industries. “There is forestry and some of the issues around the suspended sediment flows that can potentially report to the tributaries and river, as well as aggregate mining. You can see that this is a very busy area with respect to development, and looking at only one aspect of it will lead you to a skewed perspective.”

PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

Suncor to expand lobbying and carbon disclosure following shareholder activism


PARTNER WITH AN EXPERIENCED OIL SANDS LEADER With more than 100 years of experience in Canada, CB&I knows how to execute large, complex projects in environmentally sensitive locations. We ensure that design and construction strategies fit the environmental and regulatory requirements, local resource capabilities and available infrastructure. CB&I has extensive expertise with mining extraction plants, steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and heavy oil upgrading facilities. Our complete package of infrastructure support includes detailed engineering and design, technology licensing, fabrication and construction, modularization, plant maintenance and environmental services for any phase in a project’s life cycle. For your next SAGD or heavy oil upgrading project, contact CB&I to learn how we can make it a safe, profitable and on-schedule success. FRONT END ENGINEERING DESIGN ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION MODULAR AND PIPING FABRICATION POWER GENERATION/COGENERATION GAS PROCESSING AND PDH/PP PLANTS MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL PROJECTS COMPLETE STORAGE SOLUTIONS

A World of Solutions Visit www.CBI.com

26M042016H


IN REVIEW

EXPECT MODULES, PAY LESS ENGIE Fabricom goes bargain shopping to keep costs down as it assembles modules for Fort Hills JOSEPH CAOUETTE

PHOTOS BY AARON PARKER

Anyone looking for signs of the oilsands industry’s financial woes will be disappointed when setting foot on ENGIE Fabricom’s module yard in Fort Saskatchewan, Alta. Opened last year, the 35-acre location is a hub of activity as the site works through its first contract: 80 modules for Suncor Energy’s Fort Hills oilsands mine. Still, the company is acutely aware of the need to keep costs down as the industry strives to remain competitive in a world of lower oil prices. In this

environment, no potential bargain can be missed or detail overlooked. Even the shelves in the warehouse were an occasion for cost savings: the company purchased them for bargain-basement prices at Target Canada’s closing sale. There are 65 trade workers and subcontractors on site and another 25 staffers divided between the company’s Fort Saskatchewan and Calgary locations. Chief executive officer Didier Lhuillier explains that

12 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

the company deliberately sought out a diverse crew when hiring, which is why 15 per cent of the company’s trade workers are aboriginal. More than a matter of equal opportunity, this is about encouraging diverse perspectives to help the company avoid the familiar productivity pitfalls that have plagued the Alberta market for years, he says. That’s also why there is a whiteboard in the lunchroom where workers can write their ideas. With a monthly theme posted—March was all about tools—the board is filled with a variety of comments, including a request for more garbage cans near the modules and a suggestion to use sleds to move material skids more easily on the soft spring ground. In the past two weeks, Lhuillier has received 17 ideas—and 15 of those were from the trades, he says.


IN REVIEW

LEFT: Workers at the ENGIE Fabricom site in Fort Saskatchewan, Alta., assemble a module destined for Suncor Energy’s Fort Hills project. CENTRE: Chief executive officer Didier Lhuillier shows off a whiteboard where ENGIE Fabricom workers write down ideas for potential innovations. RIGHT: Material skids from South Korea wait to be assembled into finished modules. Every individual piece of steel in the skid is bar coded and scanned upon entering the site. BOTTOM: With heat tracing completed, the pipes must now be insulated before this module can be shipped north. CUT-OUT: Mobile toolboxes, stationed around the yard, are stocked by crew foremen to make sure workers have what they need close at hand.


IN REVIEW

As more SAGD well pads start reaching what was expected to be the end of their productive lives, recovery rates are achieving unexpected levels. Rudy Strobl, geological adviser at Nexen, says that SAGD producers are benefiting from wide areas of mobilized bitumen because of pad development as well as infill drilling and conductive heating (sometimes through non-condensable gas co-injection). These mechanisms are leading to recovery factors exceeding 60 per cent and economic production continuing several years longer than originally predicted. “What we do know about SAGD and thermal recovery is that we are producing more bitumen than we are supposed to. Every time when we do the reserves calculation at the end of every

year, it is supposed to be declining and it goes steady. Every year that we’re supposed to be going to wind-down or shutting down the well pad, it keeps going, and going, and going. These are pads that refuse to die,” says Strobl, who recently co-authored the paper Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage – New Perspective on Recovery Mechanisms and Production, presented at GeoConvention 2016.

The collapse in the price of oil makes the findings all the more relevant to today’s producers, Strobl says. “Once we understand how our 1,700 well pairs actually work, the mechanism that actually produces that oil, then we can make the 1,700 well pairs more efficient, be more economic and be that competitive edge that we need.”

Many SAGD well pads are now exceeding 60 per cent recovery. Suncor’s MacKay River project is seen here.

PROJECT NEWS BRION ENERGY says the first phase of its McKay River SAGD project is “very near mechanical completion” with the goal of a fall start-up, pending a go-ahead from parent company PetroChina. “We are completing construction on it. We’re still awaiting a final decision from headquarters on actual start-up,” says Bob Shepherd, executive vice-president. McKay River construction began in early 2012. The company expects that ramp-up to design capacity of 35,000 bbls/d will take about 18–24 months once

initiated. Meanwhile, Brion says its Dover SAGD project, which received regulatory approval in 2014, has been put on hold. STRATA OIL & GAS says it has entered into an agreement to acquire the rights to 115 sections or 73,600 acres of oilsands leases in the Peace River oilsands region of Alberta, increasing the size of its oilsands holdings in the area to more than 230 sections. The lands are contiguous to Baytex Energy’s Reno project lease block in the southern portion of the Peace River oilsands region, an area with extensive primary production. Strata says the new lease area is complementary to its existing Cadotte project, adjacent to Shell’s 12,000-bbl/d Peace River thermal project, which has been in operation for 30 years. Strata says it considers that the new lands offer strong development opportunities. CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES has submitted an application to the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for a

new cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) development in the Cold Lake oilsands region. The company applied for approval to construct, drill, complete and operate up to 47 wells on six multi-well pads and one single-well pad; to construct and operate seven associated bitumen batteries and access roads; and to construct and operate associated gas pipelines for on-site fuel use and transport and sale of excess gas. Canadian Natural also applied for a temporary workspace for construction and storage and requested an extended approval term of five years to complete construction. IMPERIAL OIL has applied to the AER for approval to build a solvent-assisted SAGD (SA-SAGD) project on its Cold Lake lands. The project would produce about 50,000 bbls/d of bitumen from the Grand Rapids Formation. Construction could start as early as 2019, with production starting as early as 2022, pending regulatory and internal approvals, Imperial said.

Imperial has piloted SA-SAGD at Cold Lake since 2010. Based on research and pilot results, the company expects the technology to reduce greenhouse gas intensity by 25 per cent compared to conventional SAGD because of lower energy input per barrel of bitumen recovered. PENGROWTH ENERGY says it has entered into a sale and leaseback of the cogeneration facilities at its Lindbergh SAGD project with Frog Lake Energy Resources. The project is located in the Cold Lake oilsands region; it started commercial production in mid-2015 following a successful three-year SAGD pilot. Frog Lake, which is owned by the members of the nearby Frog Lake First Nation, has invested $35 million to purchase the cogeneration facilities and leaseback to Pengrowth. The agreement is for a period of 20 years. Pengrowth says it will provide Frog Lake with long-term returns as well as the opportunity to directly participate in the operation of a successful thermal oil project.

Oilsands Review provides timely analysis of key project developments and operational performance metrics. For a comprehensive oilsands project status listing and access to deep oilsands data sets, subscribe to DOB Intelligence Essentials. For more information, please visit dailyoilbulletin.com/about.

14 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

SAGD well pads are overachieving and “refuse to die”


JUMP ON OPPORTUNITIES FROM THE ASSET LEVEL UP The CanOils Assets Module gives you insight on all oil and gas wells in western Canada, including working interest production and land data. Learn more at canoils.com


IN REVIEW Q1

INSIDE THE MIND OF THE EPCM

PROFIT/LOSS OUTLOOK Nearly half of respondents (48.4 per cent) expect to see a loss of profits in 2016, while the other half (51.6 per cent) believe there will be flat to some growth. EPCMs with diversified services and presence in

Survey results indicate expectations for 2016 and strategies for success

What is your outlook for your organization’s profits in 2016?

PRICING CHANGES Almost half of respondents (46.3 per cent) believe there will be some pricing decreases in 2016. However, one quarter of respondents expect prices to remain flat. Considering their profit expectations, this would indicate that increasing the bottom line remains about aggressive cost control. With 44 per cent of respondents expecting to see price increases of up to 5 per cent, it signals that EPCMs are leery about getting into a price war game that could have lasting effects even if market activity picks up.

20.3%

18.8%

JWN and partner Grant Thornton recently released a detailed review of the oilfield service and supply market following a survey of service and supply company leaders. The study included over 545 survey responses, 100 workshop attendees and 38 interviews—we’ve extracted the results from the engineering, procurement and construction management (EPCM) participants.

Q2

counter-cycle sectors such as refining may believe that if any part of the industry picks up, they will be able to capitalize on that growth. This could also be indicative of synergies being realized from firms merging and consolidating to become more cost competitive.

12.5%

10.9%

10.9%

10.9%

6.3%

6.3% 3.1%

-21% and less

-11% to -20%

-6% to -10%

-1% to -5%

0%

1% to 5%

6% to 10%

11% to 20%

21% and more

What is your organization’s outlook on pricing changes for products/services in 2016 versus 2015? 25.9%

18.5%

11.1%

13.0%

13.0%

9.3%

7.4% 1.9%

-21% and less

-11% to -20%

Q3

COST CONTROL PRIORITIES As the largest contributor to overhead and one of the easiest variables to manage in an immediate way—particularly for companies focused on project/ contract work—staff reductions continue to be the top cost-cutting priority. However, EPCMs also realize the difficulty in attracting and retaining top talent during market upswings. The large percentage of respondents highlights compensation reductions for cost control signals that EPCMs are doing whatever they can to maintain their workforce for what they feel will be a rapid upswing when demand rises. The low-hanging cost reduction fruit has been picked and longer-term, potentially higher-­cost saving initiatives are being undertaken, as indicated by the fourth highest priority (12.2 per cent of respondents) of implementing new technologies.

-6% to -10%

-1% to -5%

1% to 5%

0%

6% to 10%

11% to 20%

0.0% -21% and more

Q4

NEW INDUSTRY OPPORTUNITIES With stable cash flows and ongoing oil production that needs to be processed and transported, midstream companies have the resources for capital projects, so it is no surprise that EPCMs view this as the industry vertical to focus on in the near term as oilsands projects are delayed and cancelled.

Oilsands

Midstream 13.9%

33.3%

Layoffs/staff reductions

23.0%

Conventional Gas

Reductions in compensation

13.9%

17.3%

Rationalization of services/products

15.1%

Implementing new technologies

12.2% 18.1%

Asking existing suppliers to cut their costs

9.4%

New suppliers

9.4%

Consolidating offices

9.4%

Outsourcing

4.3%

16 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

20.8%

Conventional Oil

Refining


IN REVIEW

Q5

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES BY GEOGRAPHY Respondents are hesitant to diversify out of Alberta or even Canada with 22.2 per cent indicating their focus in 2016 will remain in the province and 30.4 per cent indicating they would look elsewhere in the country for opportunities. The belief could be that as energy producers in all major non-OPEC countries are struggling, EPCMs would be better served trying to win over more of the existing market share, including through consolidation.

Other Canadian locations (outside Alberta)

30.4%

Within Alberta only

22.2%

Northern/central U.S.

9.6%

Other locations in the U.S.

8.1%

Southern U.S. Middle East

7.4% 6.7%

Asia

5.2%

Europe

5.2%

Africa South America

Oilsands SAGD versus the Permian Basin Supply cost study shows SAGD is improving but light tight oil is still on top In a new study released by CanOils, the full supply costs of SAGD production in 2014-15 are benchmarked against the 2014-15 supply costs of light tight oil production in the massive Permian Basin play in the U.S. CanOils says that in order to provide an apples-to-apples comparison of the two plays, the net diluent cost for oilsands production has been excluded. The analysts note that SAGD producers generally spend about $2–$3/bbl on diluent, while mining producers covered by the study would have minimal diluent expense due to the end product transport of upgraded oil. 2014

3.0%

1. FULL CYCLE SUPPLY COST PER BOE

2.2%

$37.52

Permian

Q6

$31.00 $34.42

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES BY ACTIVITY Despite a lack of new oilsands projects being sanctioned, those in flight before the downturn are expected to be completed, resulting in production growth through the end of the decade. This, combined with the significant installed base of production capacity, results in increased producer outlay on maintenance, operations and sustaining capital. EPCMs are shifting accordingly.

Oilsands (SAGD)

What areas do you see as having the most potential for future growth? (Select your top three)

2. OPEX PER BOE

Second

Third

Response count

Permian

Maintenance and repair

18

8

6

76

Oilsands (SAGD)

8

9

5

47

10

16

8

70

Large capital projects

9

3

11

44

Exploration and development

0

2

7

11

Turnarounds

2

8

5

27

Sustainment capital

6

5

6

34

Q7

BUSINESS DIFFERENTIATORS Service, innovation and quality rank as the top three key differentiators that EPCMs want to focus on. This is in line with the EPCM strategy to become tactical advisers to clients, offering cost savings and other efficiencies by being able to provide several integrated services. 22.1%

20.4%

19.9%

Quality

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$11.84 $9.77 $13.58 $10.36 $34.50

Oilsands (Mining)

$28.01 $0

$10

$20

$30

$40

3. TRANSPORT PER BOE $2.80

Permian

$3.63 $2.30

Oilsands (SAGD)

$5.98 $1.81

Oilsands (Mining)

$1.85 $0

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

Time/speed

$16.73

Permian 9.4%

8.8% 4.4%

Innovation

$10

4. F&D PER BOE

11.0%

Service

$51.58 $46.81 $0

First

Operations

$36.06

Oilsands (Mining)

Industry type

Small capital projects

2015

Price

Safety

3.9%

Product Environmental catalogue stewardship

$13.42 $10.37

Oilsands (SAGD)

$11.41 $13.13

Oilsands (Mining)

$14.65 $0

$3

$6

$9

$12

$15

$18

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 1 7


IN REVIEW

the Clearwater shale, by flowing through induced vertical fractures, or by flowing through natural fractures or faults. In other words, the AER investigation gave more weight to geology and steaming strategy. This has more impact on the project’s future operating strategy than if inactive wellbores were the sole cause, since the latter could be remediated, which presumably would have allowed operations to continue at high injection pressures. In 2013, after bitumen was found leaking to surface at four locations, the AER ordered steam injection suspended at 228 Primrose wells. In 2014, the regulator allowed steaming to resume after it was converted to a low-pressure steamflood from the original high-pressure cyclic steam stimulation. Canadian Natural says that with some minor adjustments, the company will be able to comply with AER requirements outlined in the new report.

Although total U.S. crude oil imports in 2015 continued to be lower than levels reached during the mid-2000s, imports from the U.S.’s top foreign oil supplier—Canada—were the highest on record, according to annual trade data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Canada provided four out of every 10 barrels of oil imported into the U.S. in 2015. Canada generally produces heavy, sour crude oil that is well matched to processing capacity in the United States, the EIA says, where many refineries have the equipment needed to process such oil. “Canada has few alternative outlets for the heavy crude produced in Alberta, where most of Canada’s proved oil reserves are located,” the EIA stated. “Canada is expected to continue to provide a large share of

U.S. oil imports for the foreseeable future, especially given the expansion of pipeline and rail shipping capacities to transport Canadian oil.” U.S. gross crude oil imports from all sources averaged 7.4 million bbls/d in 2015, down 27 per cent since the 2005 high of 10.1 million bbls/d. As gross crude oil imports decline, a growing share of remaining imports are being sourced from four top suppliers: Canada, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Mexico. Canada sent a record-high 3.2 million bbls/d per day of gross crude oil exports to the U.S. in 2015, up 10 per cent from the year before, accounting for a record 43 per cent of total U.S. crude oil imports. Canada also receives nearly all U.S. crude oil exports, making up 422,000 bbls/d per day, or 92 per cent, of the 458,000 bbls/d per day of crude oil exported from the U.S. in 2015.

Gross imports of crude oil to the U.S. by country 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1985

Canada

1990

1995

2000

2005

2015

43% 14%

11%

Rest of the world

2010

23%

Saudi Arabia

Venezuela

9%

Mexico 18 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

The AER has released its final report following the investigation of bitumen surface leaks in 2009 and 2013 at Canadian Natural Resources’ Primrose thermal project, but the regulator and the company disagree on the cause. Specifically, about the extent to which inactive wellbores contributed to the problem. The AER concluded the leaks were caused by excessive steam volumes, along with open conduits such as wellbores, natural fractures and faults and hydraul­ ically induced fractures. “This is one of the most complex investigations we’ve ever undertaken,” said Kirk Bailey, the AER’s executive vice-president of operations. Canadian Natural believes that inactive or abandoned non-thermal wellbores provided the most likely pathways for bitumen emulsion to reach the surface. The AER, in all cases but one, believes bitumen escaped either by breaching

Canada provided record-high U.S. oil imports in 2015

million bbls/d

AER finalizes report on Primrose bitumen surface leaks


IN REVIEW

// EYES on the OILSANDS “There is no climate-change-denying, science-muzzling, regressive Tory government here anymore. It is time to start thinking more charitably about Alberta and the 4.4 million fellow Canadians who live here.”

PHOTOS (CLOCK WISE FROM TOP LEF T ): ENERGY.G OV; ENERGY.G OV; O.C ANADA .COM; JOE Y PODLUBNY

— Alberta Premier RACHEL NOTLEY, speaking to the federal NDP convention in Edmonton in April following the defeat of leader Tom Mulcair and the debate over the Leap Manifesto. Post Media, April 9.

“UNLIKE THE PAST, THIS VERY STEEP, RAPID DROP IN CRUDE OIL PRICES HAS NOT BEEN FOLLOWED BY A QUICK TURNAROUND…. “WE’RE STARTING TO THINK THE ENVIRONMENT WE’RE IN TODAY IS THE NEW NORMAL. IT’S NOT A SHORT-TERM ABERRATION.” — MARK WARD, president and chief executive officer of Syncrude, speaking to a luncheon of local business leaders. Fort McMurray Today, April 18.

We are excited about the oilsands, but it doesn’t enjoy a particular strategic advantage…. It’s got to compete with the other opportunities we have. — BOB SHEPHERD, executive vice-president of PetroChina’s Brion Energy. Financial Post, April 13.

“THE [OILSANDS] ISSUE IS NOT SO BLACK AND WHITE. THE QUESTION IS HOW YOU EXPLOIT [IT]…. YOU CAN ACTUALLY HAVE A NEGATIVE BARREL OF OIL IN TERMS OF ITS GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IF YOU COLLECT MORE CARBON DIOXIDE FROM THE ATMOSPHERE THAN IS EMITTED BY THAT BARREL. “SUPPOSING YOU DID THAT, WOULD YOU THINK OF THE OILSANDS IN THE SAME WAY AS IF THERE WAS NO MITIGATION AND ONLY A POLLUTANT CONSEQUENCE?” — U.S. climate envoy JONATHAN PERSHING. CBC, April 15.

“There is a growing risk that, due to protracted delays, mounting opposition, escalating costs and the lack of distinct political support, essential pipeline projects may die stillborn— just like the ill-fated Mackenzie Pipeline—with severe damage to a vital sector of the economy that is already reeling from depressed prices.” — Former Canadian prime minister BRIAN MULRONEY. National Post, April 19.

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 1 9


BUILT TO DELIVER FROM PLANNING TO PROGRESSIVE TURNOVER

FABRICATION MODULARIZATION CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE

1.866.778.3130

PHOENIXINDUSTRIAL.CA

BD@PHXIND.CA

ISO 9001 14001 18001

VISIBILITY VALUE ACCOUNTABILITY

September 6 - 9, 2016 Calgary, Alberta | Stampede Park

10

CELEBRATING

years

Connecting the Industry for a Leaner, Fitter Future. In this low oil price environment, there is an urgent need for innovation and improved technologies that will lead to more cost-effective and safe heavy oil production. R&D AND NEW TECHNOLOGY

SURFACE FACILITIES

PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION

GEOSCIENCES

THERMAL & NON-THERMAL EOR

Register | Exhibit | Sponsor

worldheavyoilcongress.com


IN REVIEW

JUNE 2006 BARRELS ON THE MOVE

Syncrude Canada commissions massive UE1 upgrader expansion

// #THROWBACK

In 2006, Syncrude Canada hit a major milestone in its development with the completion of the upgrader expansion one (UE1) project. But signs of what would soon become major headaches for the industry darkened the celebratory mood. A labour shortage was on the horizon, and the project’s hefty price tag—over twice the original estimate—was part of a decade-long struggle with cost overruns in the oilsands. In an excerpt from Oilsands Review’s first issue, editor Deborah Jaremko profiles the historic project.

DEBORAH JAREMKO

PHOTO: JEREMY SEEMAN

INTRODUCING THE OILSANDS The most significant expansion in Syncrude’s history—an approximately 100,000-bbl/d capacity increase—is now complete, and the joint venture is now capable of producing 350,000 bbls/d. Officially commissioned on May 6, 2006, UE1 not only provides more barrels to the market, but also

incorporates environmental mitigation measures and results in a new, higher value crude from the entire production stream. “It’s a step change,” says Mike Glennon, executive director of the Athabasca Regional Issues Working Group. “It puts Syncrude back in front in terms of volume of production.” Glennon says that although the oilsands is now perceived globally as an important resource, still not everyone believes in the commitment of producers and the reality of its potential. “We are not necessarily as well recognized as we think. People still have a little doubt or reservation until the oil comes out the back door,” he explains. “Every time something like this comes to fruition, it adds to the stability of the industry. These companies are serious about it and we really are going to see these barrels.”

MEGATEAM FOR MEGAPROJECT It required a myriad of contractors and subcontractors to complete UE1. A joint venture of Fluor Daniel and SNC-Lavalin executed the engineering and procurement, while Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR) was in charge of construction management. Many local contractors were involved, but the magnitude of the project demanded the company look to the broader community in Canada and around the world, according to Charles Ruigrok, Syncrude chief executive officer. “Projects of this size you cannot do purely with the capacity available in the local community,” he says. In total, the construction phase of the UE1 project required the work of 31,000 people. At peak periods, up to 8,000 people were on site working on the project, in addition to permanent operational staff.

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 2 1


I N R E V I E W • T H R OW B AC K

“[Oilsands producers] are not necessarily as well recognized as we think. People still have a little doubt or reservation until the oil comes out the back door.”

Where are they now?

CHARLES RUIGROK Ruigrok’s tenure at the top of Syncrude ended in 2007. In 2011, he began a year-long stint as interim president and chief executive officer of Enmax Corporation, where he continues to sit on the board of directors today.

— MIKE GLENNON, executive director of the Athabasca Regional Issues Working Group, May 2006

LOOMING LABOUR CRUNCH Syncrude began to see the early impacts of the looming labour crunch during the project, says co-owner Canadian Oil Sands Trust. Construction of new oilsands operations and expansions of existing plants, combined with the potential development of the Mackenzie Gas Project, have forecasters pointing to the 2007-09 period for peak labour demand. From this standpoint, Canadian Oil Sands says the timing of the UE1 was somewhat lucky. “We are fortunate that our stage three expansion is expected to be completed before the major crunch and the associated risk should be largely behind us,” the company reported in a recent investor presentation. The company says future plans also fit well with the labour market situation. “Our more modest and perhaps more flexible stage three debottleneck is an ideal expansion to be conducting during the upcoming period of heated activity in the region, while our stage four major expansion is not scheduled to occur until the next decade,” reads a recent investor presentation.

DILUENT SUPPLY Canadian Oil Sands has indicated the joint venture is considering marketing some of the production stream as a light, sour diluent for transportation of bitumen and heavy oil. The company says operating costs of producing diluent would be lower than Syncrude Sweet Premium because it does not require hydrotreating, which requires natural gas. And there is a market for the product—conventional diluents such as naphtha are in tight supply, which presents a

2 2 • Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M

growing concern for industry in general as production gets heavier and heavier. “This will help alleviate that,” says Greg Stringham, vice-president of markets and fiscal policy with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. “It really does continue the value-added stream that’s going on in the province.”

CANADIAN OIL SANDS The largest shareholder in the Syncrude project was swallowed up by Suncor Energy earlier this year after months of heated back and forth between the two companies. With the acquisition of COS and the buyout of Murphy Oil’s five per cent stake, Suncor is left as the majority owner of Syncrude, at 54 per cent.

COSTLY EXPERIENCE The final tab for the UE1 came in at about $8.4 billion—more than double the original estimate of $4.1 billion. This cost overrun, and similar price escalations for recent projects at Suncor and the Athabasca Oil Sands Project, has been attributed to general industry experience with the challenges associated with building a megaproject. “There have been a lot of negative and derogatory comments about [the cost and schedule],” says KBR representative Alan Tarasuk. “When it’s all said and done, what they built was a huge, huge project, and they should be proud of themselves.” The next phase for Syncrude is the stage three debottleneck, which will be followed by stage four—a major expansion envisioned to be similar to stage three in scope, opening up Aurora South and adding about 100,000 bbls/d of upgrading capacity. Both phases still require approval by the joint venture owners. For now, if just for a moment, Syncrude can take a breath as production from its new facilities ramps up. “This is a culmination of years worth of effort on the part of many,” Ruigrok says. “I was elated.”

ATHABASCA REGIONAL ISSUES WORKING GROUP In 2013, the organization relaunched itself as the Oil Sands Community Alliance. It continues to work with stakeholders to address the socio-economic impacts of oilsands development.

GREG STRINGHAM After serving for many years as one of the highest profile voices for the oilpatch in the media, Stringham retired from the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers earlier this year.


BROUGHT TO YOU BY FLUOR

SUSTAINING CAPITAL solutions

Fluor pushes the envelope on modularization for a unique oilsands mine revamp BY DEBORAH JAREMKO While oilsands spending on new growth capital projects has effectively ground to a halt in the current low price environment, producers continue to invest in work that improves efficiency and optimizes their existing assets. As Fluor learned on a recent project, sustaining capital work can present unique challenges, but overcoming these challenges could help the oilsands industry become more competitive in a lower-cost world. “It is quite refreshing to work on a sustaining capital job because it drives you to find solutions that are very unique,” says Fluor project manager Sean Mulholland. “When we ultimately come out of the downturn and into the next major project cycle, I think that we’re going to be better positioned as an industry because we’re going to be a lot more fit for purpose and safer. We’re going to have these solutions that have been developed from this sustaining capital mentality and build them into our capital projects.” Fluor is nearing completion of a major revamp project of extraction facilities at an operating oilsands mine that demanded

innovative thinking and a change of processes from the beginning. “Basically we had to increase the temperature of the extraction water in order to help the client increase their bitumen recovery,” Mulholland explains. “In order to accomplish that we looked at various options and what we landed on was two additional boilers, expanding their water treatment capacity and being able to cool the solvent in the froth treatment area.” The hardest part: production needed to continue during the entire process. There also wasn’t much room to work in. “Our objective was to minimize site work and be in and out as quick as we could,” Mulholland says. “There was no space within the existing building that housed water treatment and we needed to add additional capacity, so we needed to wrap our facilities around the existing building in the shape of an L. We ended up having to deal with millimetres of difference between the outside of our new building with the existing building, and millimetres between our building and the access road, so we really had no room to spare.”

Fluor was able to work with the owner, as well as its vendors and construction contractors, to successfully execute the project using its 3rd Gen Modular ExecutionSM approach. “We had to amend our whole work process and the work processes and packages of our vendors in order to be able to fit into the constrained space. It forces everybody to be very open and to show every card that they have before they play them,” Mulholland says. “It’s a very different approach but it’s one that we have to take as we move into a heavily modularized design. 3rd Gen Modular Execution really pushes everything into a module including the majority of the electrical, the majority of the piping and equipment.” On the revamp project, which was comprised of 50 Fluor modules, the company was able to move about 600,000 man-hours from the field to module fabrication yards. Taking the innovative approach was a challenge, but Mulholland says it was worth it. “I believe that taking a conventional approach to project execution would’ve led to a significantly more expensive design, increase our exposure hours at site, and also would have led us to expand the outages that the client actually had.”


PROFILE

Working Coasts A crude export tanker docked at the Westridge Terminal operated by Kinder Morgan Canada, the end of its Trans Mountain Pipeline, which has been operating since 1956. Cenovus is a contract shipper on the system but is taking tighter control over what happens to its barrels once they hit the waves.

24 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW


PROFILE

Cenovus hires 30-year marine veteran Claus Thornberg to manoeuvre midstream and get more crude overseas R.P. STASTNY

P

ipeline constraints have hobbled bitu-

Cenovus also appointed a former executive of a

men market access for close to a decade

private U.S. rail logistics company. With North

now, squeezing producer margins with

American logistics in good hands, Cenovus set

wide swings in the heavy-light oil

it sights offshore and, last year, hired Thornberg

price differential. In the absence of major arteries such as Keystone XL to the U.S. Gulf Coast,

as vice-president of marine. Thornberg is tasked with opening new op-

one of two proposed pipelines to the west coast,

tions for overseas crude shipments at the Port

or Energy East to the east, a patchwork of pipes

of Vancouver, where Cenovus currently sends

and bitumen-on-rail options have sprouted to

about 11,500 bbls/d through the TransMountain

deal with growing oilsands output. The key to

Pipeline. With the repeal of the U.S. crude oil

getting the best value from this transportation

export ban that had been in place since the

network is knowing how to work it.

height of the Arab oil embargo in 1975, the U.S.

At least that’s what Cenovus Energy believes, as it continues to expand its midstream

Gulf Coast is another sandbox of opportunity. This February, his team set up a branch

resources and expertise. Its latest addition is

office in Houston to better manage Cenovus’s

marine logistics expert Claus Thornberg. The

50,000 bbls/d of available capacity on Enbridge’s

former tanker captain brings 30 years of mar-

Flanagan South Pipeline to the U.S. Gulf Coast.

ine shipping experience and some colourful

That capacity will climb to 75,000 bbls/d by

stories to boot.

2018. By then, oil prices will almost certainly be stronger and bitumen-by-rail shipments to

DIVERSIFICATION

the U.S. Gulf Coast should also be in full swing,

When oil prices are strong, producers con-

potentially bringing more volumes for export.

sider midstream and downstream operations

“With our marine and other groups, Cenovus

a low-margin drag on their business. In the

has decided to take a very active role in

current market, when there’s no money in ex-

working on the coasts as well as engaging in

traction, refining margins that leverage cheap

dialogue at various levels, including the polit-

crude prices start to look pretty good. To its

ical level, to be a visible player in defining the

credit, Cenovus has a foot in downstream with

standards of what is a world-class standard in

a 50 per cent stake in two U.S. Phillips 66 refin­

shipping,” Thornberg says.

eries with a capacity of 255,000 bbls/d as part of an upstream-downstream asset partnership.

PHOTO: KINDER MORGAN CANADA

In mid-2015, Cenovus stepped up its

PIRATES OF SOMALIA Thornberg’s career started at A.P. Moller-

midstream presence with the acquisition of a

Maersk, an iconic company for Danish men

rail­loading terminal from Canexus. The op­

with passion for the sea. But he quickly left

portune $75-million acquisition in Bruderheim,

his peers behind. By age 28, he was a tanker

Alta., added what cost Canexus $360 million to

captain. He gave up life at sea for a shore­based

build before the crude-by-rail market collapsed

career and became managing director with

along with global oil prices.

Camillo Eitzen & Co. He advanced to the buying

To achieve the highest safety standards and the best netbacks from its rail interests,

and selling of companies as a project director and attained chief executive officer of Nordic

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 2 5


PROFILE

Tankers when it was a sizable concern of

plane circled in order for him to verify the

decided on a new management team,

about 100 ships.

identities of the 12 men, then Thornberg gave

Thornberg found himself in New York being

permission to drop the money.

interviewed for a leadership position with a

But it was as vice-president of Copenhagenbased Clipper Group in 2008 that he experi-

Everything went according to plan: the ship

dry cargo shipping company. It wasn’t a good

enced his career’s most dramatic moments. The

was released; the crew, which was predomin-

fit, so his friends in the executive search firm

company had one of its ships taken hostage by

antly Russian, was met by a Russian warship;

challenged him to widen his horizons.

Somali pirates, putting into play an 80-day

and Thornberg went off to a much-needed

negotiating marathon for Thornberg that taxed

vacation with his family. Except that, instead

off the phone with Bob Pease, the president of

all of his resources and ended with a broken leg.

of sleeping for two days, he hit the ski slopes

downstream here. The opportunity sounded

and broke his leg quite badly.

interesting to me,” Thornberg says.

“I had to change from being frustrated and angry and pissed with the Somali pirates, and treat the situation as a business situation to

“I spent the next eight days in a French hospital,” he says.

“Cenovus came up. They just literally got

It took some months to finalize Thornberg’s hire because Cenovus wasn’t entirely clear

It would be a great story if Cenovus set out to hire Claus Thornberg after seeing the documentary film where he negotiated with Somali pirates and liberated his company’s ship, recognizing the parallel between it and Canada’s situation, where anti-pipeline activists are holding bitumen production hostage. But that’s not how it played out.

negotiate a ransom and figure out how to pay

The hostage-taking got a lot of internation-

what it wanted in a marine person. Was it

al attention at the time. The entire negotiation

looking for a charterer who could arrange

and liberation process was filmed, starting at

shipments on a day-to-day basis? Or was it

ransom agreement for the release of the

hour 20, and made into a documentary.

looking for someone who could bring a stra-

ship and her crew, provided that all the crew

Thornberg was later often asked to speak

tegic view to its marine strategy?

members were alive and accounted for. Before

to various groups about his experience. The

picking up the cash from a local bank in

company’s work with the FBI and other intel-

on the latter,” Thornberg says. “Today, we work

Copenhagen, he recalls having to call and ask

ligence agencies eventually led to the arrest of

extremely well together in executing the down-

how many bags he would need for $2 million.

two of the pirates on U.S. soil.

stream strategy, which is ultimately creating

that,” Thornberg recalls. He reached an approximately $2­million

“I was told it would probably fit in one big sports bag, but better bring two. So I picked up

“They are now in U.S. prisons,” Thornberg says.

the money with an armed guard and we took

“Fortunately for me, they ended up deciding

maximum value for each barrel of bitumen that Cenovus produces and ensuring that each drop of oil arrives at the customer’s location without

it to the local airport where we had a com-

FROM OCEAN TANKERS TO SAGD

pany jet,” he says. “I had an employee with a

MARKET ACCESS

background in the British SAF [Special Armed

It would be a great story if Cenovus had seen

VALUE OF EXPERTISE

Forces]. His knowledge came in handy over

the documentary film about the hostage­taking,

“When you look at [Port of Vancouver] statis-

those 80 days. He travelled with me all the way

recognized the parallel between it and Canada’s

tics, in the 60 years that the TransMountain

to Mogadishu [Somalia], where the money was

situation, where anti-pipeline activists and

[Pipeline] has been there, and in 100 years that

put into a special canister with a parachute

the U.S. President’s Office are holding bitumen

others have been transporting oil in and out

and loaded into a drop plane.”

production hostage, and said, “We need to hire

of Vancouver, there has never been a single

this man Thornberg!”

incident involving a tanker,” Thornberg says.

Then Thornberg’s right­hand man flew

incident. Safety is paramount.”

with the money to the ship, where the crew

But that’s not how it played out. After

“It’s quite astonishing, but it reflects global sta­

was lined up on deck for identification. The

the private equity owner of Nordic Tankers

tistics on safety around tanker transportation.”

26 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW


PROFILE

Claus Thornberg is changing how Cenovus manages its tidewater shipments, both from Vancouver and the U.S. Gulf Coast.

improves your overall CO2 emission footprint.

negotiate with the ship owners on charter

for the port city as well as for the oil industry

Any spill in Vancouver would be disastrous

With the new federal and Alberta governments,

deals,” Thornberg says. “In Calgary, other than

and its prospects for future exports anywhere

carbon emissions matter more and more.”

myself, I have a project manager who sup-

along British Columbia’s coast. Until now, OPPORTUNITIES

on market access project things. It’s a small

on board (FOB) at Vancouver because it didn’t

So safety is paramount. Shipping profits are

team, but it’s a team with the right compe-

have the marine expertise to sell it delivered

nice. But the overarching purpose for Cenovus’s

tences to be able to execute a marine strategy

to final destination. Selling FOB means that

marine group is to sell into international

in a safe and efficient manner.”

the ownership of the cargo changes hands in

markets in Asia and Europe. The company’s

Vancouver and becomes the responsibility of

long-term vision is that this capability will

president of downstream that by Q1 2016

the buyer, who then arranges the ship. In this

narrow the heavy-light oil differential in

he would be ready to charter and sell cargo

way, FOB cedes control over the critical ship

North America.

delivered rather than FOB. He achieved that

selection and vetting process, which has safety

PHOTO: CENOVUS ENERGY

ports the team down there and supports me

Cenovus has been selling its production free

Its Houston office is central to this inter­

Last year, Thornberg committed to his

goal. The incremental lift in the value of a

implications for the Port of Vancouver. By sell-

national push. Thornberg’s small team of

barrel of crude can be as much as five dollars

ing through to destination, Cenovus controls

marketers, traders and logistics experts work to

when shipping to markets such as India or

the complicated and expensive vetting process

achieve the best terms for Cenovus’ crude and

China, Thornberg says.

and ensures the highest safety standards while

diluent movements and its refining require­

capturing the profits in the shipping leg.

ments, all while strengthening its presence in

might find another [favourable] market,” he

“In the vetting process, you also are able

“Over time that may level out, but then you

the important PADD III area. Houston is also a

says. “I’m not suggesting that we’ll always be

to assess things like fuel line consumption,”

hub for ship owners, brokers and everyone else

able to generate [an incremental] five dollars

Thornberg adds. “Is it a modern vessel? Does

who has a hand in international market access.

a barrel, but if we are able to generate a dollar

it get good fuel economy? Not only does this improve your overall margins, but it also

“My team is four people. Two are now in Houston. They’re the charterers, so they

per barrel just by having the ability to sell internationally, that is significant.”

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 2 7


ARE YOU CHANGING HOW YOU WORK?

Maximize Productivity & Return on Capital

Learn Faster

P310039

Create a Culture & Capability for Ongoing Improvement

Evolve is a proven partner for sustainable, results-driven change in the Alberta Energy industry. Being competitive means the Oilsands needs to move from “as good as” to “better than”. We can help.

Evolve Partners | Calgary – Houston | www.evolve.cc/albertachange

June 22 & 23, 2016

Mile One Centre | St. John’s, NL Mile One Centre, St. John’s, Newfoundland & Labrador

Held in partnership with:

Noia Conference 2016

Connecting Canada’s Offshore Oil & Gas Industry

150 leading suppliers showcasing today’s foremost technologies, products and services 2,500 visitors from 800 companies across Canada, US and Europe 97% of visitors agree this is the #1 industry event in the region 4 days of the most current information at the Noia Oil & Gas Conference, the largest offshore conference in Canada, held alongside the expo

Visit atlanticcanadapetroleumshow.com and use code OILWK for your complimentary expo pass ($50 value)


S Y N C R U D E OW N E R S H I P

Why it may be a matter of when, not if, Suncor will take over as operator of Syncrude

PHOTO: ©ISTOCK .COM/ YSBR AND COSIJN

DAVE S. CLARK

For almost four decades, the Suncor and Syncrude oilsands plants have operated across the highway from each other north of Fort McMurray in a competitive but collegial atmosphere. For 25 years, these two producers were essentially the only game on

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 2 9


S Y N C R U D E OW N E R S H I P

the go in the Athabasca oilsands. The idea

benefited from secondments from its

of Suncor now owning 54 per cent were not

of Suncor taking over Syncrude is nothing

multiple owners. Currently, it is working

answered by the company before press time.

short of pivotal, historically. But even as the

under a management services agree-

joint venture’s new majority owner, Suncor

ment signed in 2006 with Imperial Oil

of oil and gas equity research for BMO

says that’s not happening anytime soon.

(and ExxonMobil), its 25 per cent owner.

Capital Markets, says that although Suncor

That agreement gives Syncrude access

has stated there are no plans to take over

seat of the Syncrude project, following its

to certain management systems and has

operatorship, he believes it will happen in

$6.6-billion takeover of Canadian Oil Sands

brought Imperial employees into senior

the future.

and its $973-million buyout of Murphy Oil’s

management positions, but spokesman

ownership share. At 54 per cent ownership,

Will Gibson says that Syncrude itself still

with the other partners and Exxon, then

Suncor says it has already started sharing

operates independently.

give notice and take over operatorship.

its expertise with Syncrude and operator

“Syncrude has operated on behalf of

“They’ll have to have that discussion

That will take a little bit of time, but I do

Imperial Oil, but maintains it has no plans to

different owners throughout its history.

100 per cent believe Suncor plans to take

take over control of the project’s operations.

So we continue just to work at producing

over operatorship. Once they do, we expect

oil responsibly for the people that own us.

them to look to improve reliability and

do plan to do, however, is work cooperative-

That’s our commitment and that’s what

reduce costs,” he says.

ly with Imperial/Exxon and Syncrude to

we’ve done before this change of ownership

improve reliability and reduce costs,” says

and that’s what we’re going to continue to

greatly from Suncor’s involvement, and

Suncor spokeswoman Sneh Seetal. “Our

do,” says Gibson.

the management services agreement with

“That is not our present plan. What we

Ollenberger says Syncrude will benefit

According to Seetal, the management

Imperial/Exxon won’t have an impact on

reliability with the Syncrude team. We are

services agreement with Imperial is a 10-

that since Syncrude operates as a stand-

looking at working together to improve

year deal, set to expire in November 2016.

alone company.

the operational performance, and some

However, the contract will automatically

discussions on the reliability front have

roll over year-to-year unless either owner-

Exxon really only has a handful of indi-

already begun between Suncor, Syncrude

ship or the operator requests changes. She

viduals that are essentially seconded to

and Imperial.”

said there is a two­year notification period

that operating company. Over time, I would

required before any changes to the operator

expect Suncor to probably try to bring

four and as many as 10 owners at any one

could take place, and three owners making

Syncrude’s operations more and more

time in its 50-year history, Syncrude has

up 51 per cent of ownership would need to

under the umbrella of Suncor. Over time, I

operated independently but has always

agree for that to happen. The implications

suspect they will try to achieve additional

plan is to share what we’ve learned about

A joint venture that has had as few as

30 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

“When we say Exxon operates Syncrude,

PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

Suncor is now firmly in the majority

Randy Ollenberger, managing director


S Y N C R U D E OW N E R S H I P

“I think if the other owners of Syncrude embrace the opportunity that is presented with Suncor having more ownership, it can be a positive thing for everybody.” — JIM CARTER, Former Syncrude president and chief operating officer

efficiencies and reliabilities by fully inte­

investors alike, watching Syncrude kind of

develop between those two facilities over

grating the operation,” says Ollenberger.

struggle along here over the last few years,

time. Instead of operating them as two

almost since Imperial took over the man-

completely independent projects, it would

operating officer Jim Carter says the

agement services agreement in November

make sense perhaps to integrate some of

company he used to manage will directly

2006. With Suncor now nearly a 50 per cent

the infrastructure and utilities. That’s all

benefit from Suncor’s increased ownership.

owner, there’s a big incentive for them to

with the intent of lowering operating costs

“I think if the other owners of Syncrude

take a very active role in improving that

and improving reliability.”

Former Syncrude president and chief

embrace the opportunity that is presented

operation, increasing reliability and getting

with Suncor having more ownership, it can

the facility to run closer to nameplate

looking at efficiencies between the two

be a positive thing for everybody,” says Carter.

capacity, whether or not Suncor takes over

projects, but it’s too early to have any de-

the management services agreement from

tails on what future plans may be.

“I suspect that [the new ownership stake] will enable Suncor to dedicate more resources to helping the operation to move

Imperial,” says Bouchard.

Seetal says Suncor has already started

Although Suncor has the most experi-

One simply has to look back at the im-

ence in the oilsands business and is well

forward and to realize its full potential.

provements in reliability that Suncor has

suited to help Syncrude, Ollenberger says

Suncor has been in the business for a long

made to its own facilities in the past five

he doesn’t think Syncrude will ever be as

time. The strength they would have would

years to see what it could do at Syncrude,

reliable as other facilities.

be that they’ve got a lot of experienced em-

according to Bouchard. “They’ve actually

ployees who have been around for 20-plus

made some pretty dramatic changes to the

Suncor had from their process that they

years. In the last 10–12 years, Suncor has

reliability of their mining operations. If

can apply to Syncrude to help improve

done a lot to develop their people and bring

you extrapolate and take whatever they’ve

reliability there. But I don’t expect them

the best out of their folks. I think they would

done there and apply it to Syncrude, it’s

to ever achieve the same sort of reli-

certainly bring that to Syncrude as well.”

going to be better than what we’ve seen,”

ability that Suncor or Canadian Natural

he says.

Resources achieves with their delayed

Analyst Justin Bouchard, who covers both companies for Desjardins Capital Markets,

Bouchard also believes Suncor and

“I think there are lots of learnings

cokers. I think the fluidized bit cokers

says Suncor now has a big incentive to

Syncrude’s proximity to each other will lead

that Syncrude operates are inherently less

work closely with Syncrude, whether it is

to more efficiencies in the future. “Longer

reliable,” he says.

as its operator or in the advisory role it has

term, if you look at where the facilities are,

already started to take on.

Syncrude and Suncor’s mining projects

like Syncrude’s have complications and

are right beside one another, and you’re

can be tricky to run, but said they can also

probably going to see some more synergies

be operated very successfully.

“Suncor has been watching patiently from the sidelines, as everyone has,

Carter says he agrees that fluid cokers

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 3 1


S U S TA I N I N G C A P I TA L

SAGD producers are looking to tackle costs with standardized designs for sustaining capital projects—but is it really possible? MELANIE COLLISON

f nothing else, this unwelcome

Energy Studies, points out companies are

downturn is breaking down the

increasingly treating SAGD like a manufac-

oilsands sector’s complacency. The

turing operation. Beyond modularizing plant

protracted low price environment

components, producers are also standardiz-

is forcing companies to flex their

ing wells and pads to improve cost efficiencies.

creative muscles and reinvent

Yet full standardization remains beyond the

themselves.

grasp of industry—for now, at least.

“Complacency in the long run will result

“Processes that are dependent on the

in failure,” says Allan To, president of the

local geology, such as optimizing steam to oil

Supply Chain Management Association of

ratios in SAGD, are more difficult to replicate

Alberta and senior commercial manager,

at scale, and true ‘manufacturing’ SAGD

category management, at Suncor Energy.

processes remain aspirational at this point,”

“This sector has experienced signifi­

the report reads. “Survival is a compelling

cant changes, and it has shown itself to be

motivator, however, and producers do realize

extremely resilient historically,” he says.

that they need to rapidly improve operat-

“Looking out there to our supply community

ing practices or remain uncompetitive for

and the owner-producers, I see a lot of en-

investment.”

ergy around people finding ways to survive,

As SAGD moves from infancy to maturity,

finding ways to reinvent themselves and

companies are embracing the principles

finding ways to be successful. That’s what

of mass production to achieve economies

achieves greatness.”

of scale. As with cars or computers, the

Resilient people—or industries—see

technology was engineered very specifically

change as an opportunity and capitalize on

every time it was applied in the early days.

it. Case in point: the movement to reimagine

“Now that we’ve run that many, many years

SAGD design as a standardized commodity,

over, some of that engineering has already

which greatly reduces the need for detailed

been done. Let’s take some of that engin-

engineering, thus boosting capital efficiency.

eering away and standardize some of that

This is particularly important for the on-

design. That’s where things are going right

going investment needed to sustain opera-

now,” To says.

tions, including the drilling and construction of new SAGD well pads.

“The rate of adoption is a function of the imperative to change,” he continues. “Given

The Future of the Canadian Oil Sands, a

that we are in an extremely low oil [price]

report produced by the Oxford Institute for

environment and what we’re all seeing is

32 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW


S U S TA I N I N G C A P I TA L

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 3 3


S U S TA I N I N G C A P I TA L

SAGD well pad at Suncor’s Firebag SAGD project

lower and not only longer, but much longer,

incorporating lessons learned to improve

says. “In the hands of a producer that

the imperative to change is that much

efficiency and drive down capital costs.

understands its resource and has carefully

Chad Hadler, director of technical

thought through its facility requirements, a

these tough environments are in the best

services for modularized well pad provider

highly standardized well pad design should

position to ride it out and be successful.”

Integrated Thermal Solutions, says deep

require minimal engineering effort and a

industry experience has to inform a stan-

lot less time to execute.”

STANDARDS AND PRACTICES

dardized product. He notes that employees

Cost now trumps the desire of clients to

at his company have seen over eight gener-

ENGINEERING SHAKE-UP

impose their own standards and specifi­

ations of well pads, and they have learned

Simon Nottingham, general manager of

cations on each project. The term “repli-

to integrate engineering, fabrication and

Fluor Canada, says the engineering per-

cation” is also used by some to describe

field construction into a turnkey product.

centage of a project budget would typically

this approach, but it’s misleading, says Rob

Each model is designed to fit a large spec­

range in the mid-teens, depending on the

McNeill, principal of Drifter Projects, a pro-

trum of situations.

development. Reducing engineering to just

ject management consultant that shepherds SAGD projects for mid-sized producers. “Replication implies you rubber stamp

“We’re selling a solution and a prod-

adding updates to a standard design could

uct; we’re not selling a service,” he says.

drive that figure down to three or four per

“They’re two different business models—

cent, he believes.

something; you’re producing the same

the detailed engineering and separate

That might not be healthy for a pure

thing over and over, like a manufacturing

teams managing installation, and sep-

engineering company, but for an engineer-

process that would produce cars,” McNeill

arate teams managing the fabrication

ing, procurement and construction (EPC)

says. “It can never be like that when you’re

contracts. All of those jobs are typically

company like Fluor that has access to the

dealing with resource extraction, because

reimbursable cost-plus jobs, which in my

global reach of its multinational parent,

each resource is different and it requires

opinion was [the industry’s] big down-

engineers will simply be redeployed to the

you to think through what you’re trying to

fall and how Alberta’s cost per barrel for

next growth area, he says.

accomplish.”

installation went up so high.”

But he believes a high degree of stan-

In the perennial tug of war between lump

In the bigger industry picture, McNeill anticipates engineering firms will repli­

dardization is still possible. “In well pairs

sum and cost-plus contracting models,

cate the cycle of acquisitions, mergers and

and how the pads are constructed, that’s

pruning out detailed engineering could give

divestments that has long characterized

a very easy place to standardize. So then

the former an advantage.

Alberta’s oil industry.

you’re using a similar design every time out

“Logistics will be streamlined. There’ll

“We’ve gone through a cycle here where

and you save money,” he says. Other parts

be fewer billable hours, but a more efficient

the big engineering firms swallowed up a

of the SAGD process call for continually

product and outcome, for sure,” McNeill

bunch of the medium sized engineering

34 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

PHOTO: DEBOR AH JAREMKO/JWN

greater. Those companies that can adapt in


S U S TA I N I N G C A P I TA L

firms, and unfortunately, that doesn’t im­ prove efficiency,” McNeill says. In some cases, an engineering firm may actually dwarf the resource company that hires it. For a relatively nimble and

The case for a united front on project design

decisive company with a few hundred employees, it can be difficult turning over responsibility for the design, construction and commissioning of a project to an organization five or six times its size. The inherent bureaucracy of the larger company just doesn’t match well with the smaller one. “You really lose a lot of effi­ ciency trying to make the cultures mesh,” he says.

REDUCING BUREAUCRACY Chester Nagy, who founded Plains Fabrication & Supply in 1988, has dealt with that shad-

Operators at Statoil’s Leismer SAGD

owing and the bureaucratic hurdles from his side of the blueprints, too. Nagy is active in PAAD (Productivity Alignment and Delivery), the partnership of owners, EPCs and suppliers collaborating to improve industry productivity, and he’s on the Alberta board of directors of Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters. One bad apple eroded trust broadly within the industry about 15 years ago, and a handshake was no longer enough to seal a deal, Nagy says. That opened the door for EPCs to add layers of bureaucracy in the execution of a project. The industry got pushed into adding inspectors and paperwork, which he says is frustrating because fabricators used to be able to do the same job to the same standard of quality 20–25 per cent faster. The extra inspections and X-rays slow everything down. PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

“You’ll have five people looking at a dial that’s not moving for an hour,” Nagy says, “but if I don’t do [every extra inspection] one single time, I lose my licence. They created a redundancy of mistrust. It’s ingrained now; it’s hard to undo.”

Oilsands producers could overcome their existential threat if they could only come together on common specs and standards JOSEPH CAOUETTE

H

ow difficult is it to build in Alberta? Consider the following scenario: a company goes looking for a compressor skid. Like any good service provider, the vendour feverishly worked to incorporate the owner company’s in-house standards into the design. As a result, there were nearly 200 spec deviations that ultimately took two months to resolve. In some cases, the two companies were disagreeing over insulation thicknesses that could be measured in millimetres. “Was it worth spending three months of everybody’s time on a customized compressor skid that is really just worth $5 million?” asks Anirudh Kumar, a construction engineer and project manager at Swift Resources. “If we can see this on a $5-million compressor skid, just imagine what’s going to happen on a $5-billion project.” Kumar has worked on a number of major oilsands projects, including Canadian Natural

Resources’ Horizon mine, Suncor Energy’s Fort Hills mine, and Cenovus Energy’s Foster Creek and Christina Lake developments. What he found was that each organization had its own set of in-house standards and specifications, developed over the years through ingrained habits and ad hoc additions. There is the Suncor way and the Cenovus way, and never the twain shall meet. But one approach is not necessarily better than the other—it’s just different, that’s all. Speaking at Calgary’s Modular Construction and Prefabrication Summit Canada 2016 in March, Kumar made a case for standardization as the next great shift in how the oilsands approaches modular fabrication. The audience, while receptive to his message, was skeptical that such a goal could ever actually be realized. “We’ve got owner companies clustered very close to each other north of Fort McMurray, and we can’t even get them to share an airport,” one attendee asked. “How are you going to get them to share standards?” Actually, forget about the challenges of developing common standards across multiple organizations: what about simply developing unified specs within a single company? The same audience member explained that his employer couldn’t even manage a unified approach across its own business silos, which include

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 3 5


S U S TA I N I N G C A P I TA L

— Audience question at Modular Construction and Fabrication Summit Canada 2016

36 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

heavy oil, oilsands, and conventional oil and gas. Companies will need to start sorting out their own tangled web of standards before they can begin to look at industry-wide changes. Kumar acknowledges this change will be difficult, but he is seeing companies starting to look at streamlining their own internal specs and standards. In fact, he’s working on tackling that very challenge right now with a petrochemical company. Still, even with leadership buy-in, the process will likely take 12–14 months, he says. In an interview with Oilsands Review, Kumar puts much of the blame on overdesign. He recalls a project where the team had planned to add a closed hydrocarbon trench to help drain vessels during turnarounds, which opened up a wealth of new engineering issues. More valves were needed. Drains had to be placed underground, which increased construction costs. Maintenance costs would rise. The system would need to be monitored to ensure no hydrocarbons leaked. Or you could just bring in a hydrovac to clean out the vessels whenever necessary and avoid all of the extra design and construction work. “We don’t realize that when we customize too much, we’re not letting the operations crew manage the operations,” he says. “Let’s design it one way and let operations come up with their own procedures. Have faith in the ability of those guys to do it safely and efficiently, so we don’t have to incorporate these things into the design.” The company ultimately dropped the trench idea, but more because of the 2008-09 financial

SAGD well pad at Cenovus Energy’s Christina Lake project crash than any special epiphany about the dangers of overdesign. However, cost reductions are just as important today as the oilsands industry faces an “existential threat” from low prices, Kumar says. Because of the massive scale of oilsands developments, the industry has considerable bargaining power with suppliers—but only if it can start pushing more unified standards, he says. The market becomes much more attractive for vendors if it is possible to offer the same product to multiple companies, rather than having to customize and redesign right down to the level of valves and gauges for each client. Kumar believes standardization could translate into cost savings ranging between 15 and 20 per cent. The most significant hurdle may simply be encouraging the owner companies to relinquish some of the internal standards that have developed over the years. There is a wealth of expertise in the industry, but the ability to apply continuous learning from previous projects will continue to be thwarted as long as engineers, fabricators and builders are forced to adapt new solutions to the same old problems with each client. “On one of the projects I’m doing, I’m supervising our construction contractors, and they’re all good at what they do,” Kumar says. “The problem is they have to retrain themselves. We have amazing talent, but we’re not utilizing it because they’re constantly relearning.”

PHOTO: CENOVUS ENERGY

“We’ve got owner companies clustered very close to each other north of Fort McMurray, and we can’t even get them to share an airport. How are you going to get them to share standards?”


Inform. Connect. Grow. The industry is changing and so are we. For over 75 years, JWN has provided the most trusted intelligence and insight on Canada’s energy industry through products such as the Daily Oil Bulletin, Oilweek, Oilsands Review, CanOils and Evaluate Energy. We are pleased to introduce jwnenergy.com , the newest addition to our portfolio of products and your resource for the latest oil and gas news, research reports, data and event information— updated daily. Visit jwnenergy.com to sign up for your free daily energy e-news alert today.


F E AT U R E

38 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW


PA R T I A L U P G R A D I N G

PARTIAL UPGRADING COULD ADD VALUE TO ALBERTA BITUMEN AT A LOWER COST, BUT COMMERCIALIZATION STILL HAS A LONG WAY TO GO R.P. STASTNY

erald Bruce, like most people associated with the upgrading of bitumen, is encouraged by the Alberta government’s recent endorsement of partial upgrading. Against the backdrop of sub-$50 WTI and a barrel of bitumen selling at even less, partial upgrading is a compelling proposition because it has the potential to narrow the light-heavy oil differential, reduce or eliminate the cost of diluent in piping bitumen (which also effectively increases the capacity of the existing pipeline network for bitumen), reduce the overall carbon intensity of bitumen refining and provide better netbacks to oilsands producers. But oilsands producers won’t see any of these benefits through this downturn because commercial partial upgrading is still years away. Also, the government’s $300 million of incentives—the details of which are still pending—may not seem like much to an industry more accustomed to thinking in billions. Bruce, who is the president of GWB Process Consulting, makes the point that to get to a place where the industry can spend billions on commercial partial upgrading, it will need to first spend millions in the development stage. “So in this sense, [the incentives are] pretty important,” he says.

PHOTO: JOHN ASPDEN

WHAT COUNTS AS PARTIAL UPGRADING? In most discussions, the timeline for commercialization of partial upgrading technology is anywhere from 10 to 15 years.

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 3 9


PA R T I A L U P G R A D I N G

In addition to the Alberta government’s $300 million of incentives for partial upgrading, AI-EES also has a collaborative federal/provincial/industry National Partial Upgrading Program to accelerate technical and economic innovation in partial upgrading. Six unnamed oilsands producers make up the industry component.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Government funding for the program:

Muse Stancil forecasts two cases for partially upgraded bitumen market penetration: The high case:

1.26 million bbls/d by 2035

The moderate case:

$1.6 MILLION

per year for the first three years

$3.2 MILLION

as worthy projects are identified

When asked why nobody talks about Imperial Oil’s paraffinic froth

633,000 bbls/d by 2035

dle PUBs. European and Gulf Coast high-conversion and heavy-cok-

treatment at Kearl as an example of commercial partial upgrading

ing refiners, for example, could readily accept medium quality PUBs.

that’s already in use, Duke du Plessis, senior adviser, energy technol-

Slightly higher quality PUBs, however, could find considerable

ogies with Alberta Innovates – Energy and Environment Solutions

uptake in med­ium conversion and coking refineries in China as well

(AI-EES), explains that it doesn’t fully measure up to the criteria set

as in the U.S. Gulf Coast and Upper Midwest.

out by AI-EES for partial upgrading because it still requires diluent and it doesn’t increase the value of the bitumen. The objective of partial upgrading is twofold. “You aim at reducing

All this is good to know but somewhat academic until pipelines connect Alberta to tidewater. So last year, AI-EES commissioned a study of the potential of PUBs in nine Eastern Canadian and Sas-

or eliminating diluent. The second thing is you improve the quality

katchewan refineries. Those results are still pending but, as with

and market value of that crude. So if you get something like the deas-

other refining regions, PUBs could improve the economics and com-

phalted product in paraffinic de­asphalting, it still has properties that

petitiveness of Alberta’s oilsands producers.

aren’t valued by the client.”

“The gross netback of partially upgraded products is substantial,” du Plessis says. “We found that the netbacks were tied more to the

MARKETS FOR PARTIALLY UPGRADED BITUMEN

light-heavy differential and were less sensitive to the absolute value of

As the research arm of the Alberta government, AI-EES started look-

the crude oil [pricing].... The value uplift derives almost 50/50 from the

ing at full upgrading in 2004. When its research showed that more

reduction of diluent and the added value of the bitumen component.”

upgraders weren’t likely to be built in western Canada, it turned its

Achieving the best economics, according to AI-EES, will require

attention to partial upgrading and, in 2012, published a competitive-

striking the right balance between oil quality—on a spectrum that

ness study that models the potential of partially upgraded bitumen

starts with relatively low-cost solvent deasphalting and moves

crudes (PUBs) in the PADD II U.S. refining market—where most

through to hydrotreating and hydrocracking—and minimal capital

Canadian oil ends up.

investment needed for this conversion.

In 2015, AI-EES commissioned a Muse Stancil study of six global

“If you go past that peak, you’re spending money on a plant that

refining regions—Japan, India, China, Europe, Korea and the U.S. Gulf

you’re not getting value from,” du Plessis says. “How much capital

Coast—that shows these regions vary widely in their abilities to han-

a company can afford to invest to realize an increased netback will

40 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW


PA R T I A L U P G R A D I N G

be a function of a producer’s capex intensity and its internal rates of return.”

TECHNOLOGIES THAT TAKE BITUMEN TO END PRODUCTS If Imperial Oil’s deasphalting process is at one end of the spectrum that doesn’t quite reach into the “partial upgrading” category, there are also number of proponents that overshoot the category on the other end. These include Value Creation, Field Upgrading and Bayshore Petroleum. All of these are now aiming at refined end products. Bayshore has teamed up with E-T Energy to deploy Bayshore’s chemical catalytic conversion technology for in situ bitumen extraction at E-T’s Poplar Creek oilsands property. Bayshore, however, also claims its catalyst technology can convert bitumen straight to diesel—and at an astonishingly low cost of $8,000 per flowing barrel, compared to an estimated $160,000 per flowing barrel at the Sturgeon Refinery Project being built by the North West Redwater Partnership. Value Creation initially said it wanted to produce a “cleaned” sour synthetic crude that is more easily refined but has since moved up the ladder to a “clean oil refinery [model] that can produce—most cost effectively—very high quality light fuel products as well as premium medium crudes that not only fit the majority of refineries in North America, and eventually globally, but also enhance their refinery margins,” says Columba Yeung, chair and chief executive officer of Value Creation. Another company lumped in as a partial upgrader is Field Upgrading. Its technology is a step out from the usual deasphalting and thermal cracking approaches. It uses molten sodium to upgrade

“Featuring the most extensive one-stop pressure vessel component fabrication capabilities in North America.”

bitumen into bunker fuel, which is aimed squarely at an emerging

Pressure Vessel Components | Field Services | Heat Exchangers

market for low-sulphur heavy oil in ocean shipping.

Whatever your pressure vessel component requirements, Edmonton Exchanger has your solution. Our steel fabrication division builds a full range of pressure vessel component sizes and thicknesses, and is supported by one of the largest SA516-70 normalized carbon steel plate inventories in the world.

According to marine industry data, just 15 of the largest ships in the world produce more pollution than all the cars in the world. This is because ships burn high-sulphur heavy oil, and regulators are cracking down. “We can take high sulphur heavy oils, like bitumen, remove the sulphur and sell the low sulphur product into the marine fuel oil market at low sulphur diesel prices. It’s a ‘Bitumen-to-Boats’ busi-

Visit www.edmontonexchanger.com for a detailed product and service listing.

ness,” says Neil Camarta, president and chief executive officer of Field Upgrading. By year end, Field Upgrading expects to have its Fort Saskatchewan pilot proven and to have completed a design-basis memorandum for a 10,000-bbl/d commercial project.

PARTIAL UPGRADING SYSTEMS MEG Energy’s HI-Q process, Ivanhoe Energy’s HTL technology (the company is now bankrupt), ETX Systems’ IYQ process, and the

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 4 1


PA R T I A L U P G R A D I N G

“The technology that will prevail is going to be the one that is

USEFUL AT THE LOWEST ENERGY INTENSITY/CARBON FOOTPRINT.... There isn’t one answer here but multiple answers.” — GERALD BRUCE, president of GWB Process Consulting

approaches of Fractal Systems and Petrosonic Energy are some of

50 per cent by heating diluted bitumen just below thermal cracking

the partial upgrading approaches vying for commerciality

temperatures and pumping it through proprietary jet-nozzles where

in Alberta.

cavitation and mechanical shearing occurs. The company says that

ETX Systems’ technology is an example of “almost the highest quality [PUB],” says chief executive officer Gerard Monaghan. “We believe that finding the most accretive mix is full coking of

between April 2014 and April 2015, it processed over 100,000 barrels of diluted bitumen, successfully proving the base technology. Fractal director Joe Gasca says the technology is primarily

the bottom of the barrel, but without the addition of any hydrogen.

focused on diluent reduction but the process also results in some

Refiners are much better positioned in terms of infrastructure and

partial upgrading. He says Fractal is working to get in front of Alberta

proximity to end markets to provide the hydrogen piece of the up-

government representatives to better understand the partial upgrad-

grading puzzle.”

ing incentive opportunity. Meanwhile, Gasca says the company is

Interestingly, Monaghan envisions a significant role for rail in the

nearing completion of a retrofit at its Provost facility and that for the

transport of PUBs because the olefins produced in partial upgrading

remainder of this year will pilot a new configuration called Enhanced

can make it difficult to meet pipeline specifications. He says that

JetShear. Also being piloted is their Acid Reduction Process, another

rail facilities could be repurposed to serve intermediate partially up-

technology system designed to specifically address high-TAN crudes.

graded bitumen. “With rail, you are naturally segregated, so I see that as a growing

Bruce believes the best partial upgrading options target wide-spectrum crude refineries, such as those found in Eastern Can-

and enabling potential for rail…[because] partially upgraded products

ada and the U.S. Midwest. This approach has the potential to strike

like ours have no flashpoint concerns and will float on water,” he

the right balance between crude quality improvement and minimal

says, referring to the tragedy at Lac-Mégantic, Que., and the concerns

investment, while avoiding competition with Bakken light oil for

over bitumen sinking in ocean and waterway spills.

refining capacity.

Monaghan says ETX’s technology has good traction with some

“The technology that will prevail is going to be the one that is

midstream partners and plans are being made for a 14,000-bbl/d

best suited to make products that are useful at the lowest energy

demonstration project.

intensity/carbon footprint,” Bruce says. “It’s a long-term process, but

“I’m cautiously optimistic that we will be able to access the funding we need to move forward in the next couple of months,” he adds. Fractal Systems has been piloting its JetShear technology in the

it’s strategic as well. You’ve got another 800,000 or 900,000 barrels of production coming on over the next two years. How you respond to this can be through partial upgrading, which gets you in the right

field since 2009, first with a 300 bbl/d facility near Consort, Alta.,

direction, but you might want to also consider conversion to finished

followed by a 1,000 bbl/d commercial scale demonstration near

products and putting those on rail cars to get to market. So there isn’t

Provost. It is designed to reduce diluent requirements as much as

one answer here but multiple answers.”

42 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW


IN TODAY’S WORLD, SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST MEANS SURVIVAL OF THE MOST

INFORMED. FULL PAGE JWN AD 487551 WE’RE IN YOUR CORNER. Use the DOB Intelligence Essentials tools for project leads and industry insights. Identify new prospects using the DOB’s Project Opportunity database. Act on western Canadian opportunities for drilling, small projects, facilities, turnarounds, pipelines, oilsands projects and more. Get data and news alerts on producer activity, drilling activity and capital spending.

INFORMATION THAT GIVES YOU AN EDGE Start a trial now on dailyoilbulletin.com/freetrial


TECH_SERIES

THE

Throughout 2016, Oilsands Review is publishing a series of technology-centric stories. Watch for more in our September edition.

NEXT GENERATION OF OILSANDS

IMPROVING MINING WATER AND LAND USE THROUGH INTEGRATED, INNOVATIVE SYSTEMS

in oilsands tailings water treatment with the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). “We are working on [a] few treatment

CARTER HAYDU

processes I cannot disclose at this time, but basically we are looking at some combinations “Part of the reason for that is because the

of physical and chemical treatments together

mining sector of integrated water management

temperature in the reservoir with in situ is

to accelerate the treatments, and we are also

is when tailings water is disposed of through

much, much hotter. It is over 150 [degrees

looking at some biological and physical pro-

reuse as the supply for steam generation to

Celsius]; you are solubilizing some of the silica

cesses together to make the treatments more

produce bitumen at an in situ facility, says Kim

in the reservoir; it comes up through the water,

cost effective and less greenhouse­gas (GHG)

Westcott, senior surface water policy specialist

and that presents some interesting treatment

intensive.”

with Alberta Environment and Parks.

challenges when you go to make more steam.”

“We believe that there is opportunity for

For mining, operators are really only using

GETTING READY FOR TMF Last year, the Government of Alberta released

future integration and future improvements of

water when mixing it-at around 56 degrees

water use intensity,” she told the 2016 COSIA

Celsius-with the ore, he notes. “As a result you

its Tailings Management Framework for

AI-EES Water Conference. As technologies ac-

don’t solubilize any silica, but there are a whole

Minable Athabasca Oilsands, which focuses on

celerate tailings treatment in accordance with

bunch of other challenges with mining trying to

getting tailings ponds remediated faster and

the province’s new tailings management frame-

separate the bitumen from the water and clay.”

slowing tailings pond growth. Westcott told

work (TMF), Westcott adds, government and in-

While there currently are no regulations for

the water conference the province’s frame-

dustry must explore management solutions for

oilsands tailings release in the province, re-

work recognizes future water use integration

optimizing outcomes and reducing liabilities

search at the University of Alberta will help in

may in some instances compromise environ-

associated with process-affected waters.

the eventual development of such regulations.

mental outcomes, in which cases the release

Although substantial in either case, the wat-

“Regulations are based on [the] best

of treated tailings water could be an option. “The environmental risk assessment will

er challenges that innovation must tackle differ

available technologies and also making sure

significantly depending on whether for in situ

the treated water when released is going to

be comprehensive. We will require that all pro-

or mining, says John Brogly, water director at

be safe for the environment,” says Mohamed

ponents look at the net effects associated with

Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA).

Gamal El-Din, senior industrial research chair

reusing, recycling and releasing, and in cases

44 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

Probably the best example in the oilsands


TECH_SERIES_WATER

TAILINGS TECHNOLOGIES where the net effects of reusing or recycling

plans would also report out on water manage-

the work it is doing and how to proceed with

that stream are greater than releasing, then we

ment performance and provide water demand

TMF implementation. Westcott says: “We will

will consider release to the environment.”

and water use and water supply forecasts.”

continue to work closely with the AER and

Westcott adds: “These applications will be

The second project involves developing the

Water Management Working Group for the

subjected to the existing and supplemental

regulatory process for managing new waste-

rest of this year, and our intent is to develop

requirements that we are in the process of de-

water releases, which connects directly to the

a prioritized project plan for this initiative by

veloping to essentially perform a site­specific

TMF. “This project also includes developing

the end of this year.”

environmental risk assessment to determine

those supplementary requirements that are

and minimize the impacts of this release on

intended to support existing processes.”

the aquatic environment and on human uses.”

The third project essentially reviews what

She adds: “We know that the oilsands mining sector is growing, and consequentially production is increasing. Therefore, more

CEP initiatives are already happening in

water may need to be brought on site for

mine-site water be managed as part of an

Alberta in order to determine whether those

extraction purposes. Again, it looks like the

integrated system to minimize environmental

initiatives are sufficient to meet the province’s

water footprint will increase.”

impacts, that water conservation efficiency

objectives. The fourth project concerns water

and productivity (CEP) improve throughout

release regional management, which Westcott

all phases of mining, and that excess water

says involves developing a regional waste-load

inventories are reduced and on-site water

allocation for the Athabasca River to deter-

The key to effective and affordable tailings

quality improves through all mining and rec-

mine the best substance release strategy.

treatment involves a blend of methods

Initiative outcomes include that oilsands

lamation phases. The fourth outcome relates

“Most of the core projects are currently in a

TAILORING THE RIGHT TREATMENT PROCESS

tailored for the specific, problematic oil­

to ambient water quantity and quality for the

scoping phase. We have started some work in

sands process-affected waters (OSPWs), says

regional ecosystems.

a few of the key areas. We are working closely

NSERC’s Gamal El-Din.

“We have developed several core projects to

with the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to

“You need to use a combination of differ-

support these outcomes,” Westcott says. The first

finalize the project roles and responsibilities.

ent treatment processes, because you cannot

project enhances water management planning

All of the four projects will either have an

just go for the ones that are going to be super

performance systems. “Essentially, this project

Environment and Parks lead or an [AER] lead.”

expensive—they are going to require a lot of

is about developing a process in which oilsands

In January, the ministry launched a

energy and are associated with [GHG] emis­

mining operators would develop integrated water

multi-stakeholder technical working group to

sions. Therefore, we have to look at the whole

management plans on a regular basis, and these

provide the province with technical advice on

thing from a holistic viewpoint. Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 4 5


TECH_SERIES_WATER

Up and running: Tailings technology enhancements start delivering results In the past, Suncor Energy’s solution to managing its increasing volumes of mined oilsands tailings was to just build more tailings ponds. That was before the company implemented Tailings Reduction Operations (TRO) technology, says Mark Little, Suncor’s executive vice-president, upstream. “It is really about accelerating the pace at which we can recycle the water,” he told the company’s recent annual general meeting. “The huge advantage of that is that we can shrink our footprint and not have nearly as many tailings ponds, and so we stopped building tailings ponds.” Suncor began piloting TRO in 2008 and received regulatory approval to deploy it commercially across its operations in 2010. The process involves the mixture of mature fine tailings with a polymer flocculent, which is then deposited in thin layers over shallow-slope sandbanks, resulting in a dry material suitable for reclamation purposes. Drying occurs

over a shorter time frame (weeks versus centuries, Suncor has said), allowing for faster reclamation. “Now we have started putting the sand right back into the pit, and managing the water recycling and such on a faster basis. This is all about reducing the footprint of technology.” According to Little, TRO is enabling Suncor to update its tailings plans, reducing risk and exposure, driving down water volumes used and increasing recycling. “There has been enormous progress in tailings, but now we still have to reclaim our ponds that we have had historically. We do have a number of ponds that we are working on, and we are in varying degrees of capping those off and getting them ready for reclamation.” Syncrude has also taken big steps on the tailings management front in recent years, including working with Newalta to integrate centrifuge technology. Last year, Syncrude completed construction

“Different scenarios of treatment will be

of a $1.9-billion commercial-scale tailings centrifuge plant, which includes 18 centrifuges measuring nine metres long by two metres high. These spin out the water from fluid fine tailings (FFTs). Heavy haulers then move the resulting “cake”—which is a mud-like substance—to areas in Syncrude’s north mine, where after a freeze-thaw cycle it is considered solid enough to be trafficable. “This is something that we are actually going to be using to start reclaiming. These FFTs treated by centrifuge are what we are using to fill back our north mine,” Gibson says. “After one year, it will become strong enough to support reclamation material and landscapes, whether we are putting grass or trees up in forests, or wetlands over top of them.” Canadian Natural Resources implemented non-segregating tailings (NST) production in 2015 at its Horizon project using cyclones, thickeners and CO2 addition. Management expects NST production to increase the capture of fines, resulting in a smaller tailings footprint and shorter reclamation time frame. According to public affairs adviser Julie Woo, Canadian Natural has been adding CO2 to tailings since 2009 to enhance the solids settling rate and

According to Gamal El-Din, notable

reduce the size of tailing ponds by about half, sequestering carbon in the process. To monitor NST effectiveness and to continually enhance tailings performance, the company created the Applied Process Innovation Centre (APIC) in 2015, a research facility built at Horizon. APIC facilitates collaboration on research projects with industry, academia and government, Woo notes. Currently, work at the facility is focused on tailings management, but Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance says it could be expanded to other process enhancements in the future. Shell Canada’s new tailings technology is called Atmospheric Fines Drying (AFD), which is also designed to speed tailings treatment and create a dry material that allows for faster reclamation. Shell started commercial-scale operations of an AFD plant at its Muskeg River Mine in 2010, but could not be reached to provide a status update on the technology for this story. At Kearl, the industry’s newest mining operation, tailings reclamation is in its early stages. Kearl produced its first oil in 2013, and according to its tailings management plan filed with the Alberta Energy Regulator, fines capture will start in 2018 using a thin lift drying system.

He adds: “Different absorbents have

dictated by the different requirements for

processes include advanced oxidation. While

been used, ranging from petroleum coke all

treatment, the impact on the environment,

ozone treatment is quite fast and efficient,

the way to other very highly active or very

the available footprint, the timescale people

it is costly compared to biological treatment

highly efficient absorbents. Every scen-

are looking at achieving their reclamation,

methods. Biological treatments are slower

ario is different, and every treatment is

and so forth.”

and require a larger environmental footprint.

different—cost-wise, in terms of the capital

The U of A environmental engineering

Some methods, such as using bioreactors,

cost, operationally, maintenance-wise, and

professor’s 35-person laboratory crew studies

have the potential of a smaller physical foot-

so on.”

a variety of tailings treatment process op-

print as well as reduced water impacts.

portunities, which could be scaled up to an

Other treatments use biologically active

Gamal El-Din’s research chair is funded by oilsands producers, water treatment

applied research phase using the application

filters to treat the OSPW under gravity, work­

providers, and the provincial and federal

of various processes and technologies.

ing as a physical and biological combination

governments. Prior to his current oilsands

He says: “If it proves efficient, then it is

treatment, which definitely implies a larger

tailings work, he conducted municipal

up to oilsands companies as to whether they

environmental footprint, says Gamal El-Din.

water and waste­water research. He says

will use it or not. My role is to come up with

“We have other approaches such as

as many solutions as possible for different

absorption methods, where purely phys-

potential shared research benefits between

scenarios of treatment and different types

ical absorption or treatment processes can

the two sectors.

of water that need to be treated. It then

use some absorbing material to remove the

becomes available for solutions with…future

organic matter from the OSPW. It seems to be

water we can use in other areas, such as

reclamation and treatment.”

efficient as well.”

municipal applications.”

46 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

there is a fair amount of crossover and

“Some of the work we do for the process


TECH_SERIES_WATER

OILSANDS RESEARCHERS TACKLE TECHNOLOGY TO ADDRESS THE COSTS OF MANAGING THEIR MOST VALUABLE LIFELINE

consumption in oilsands operations will also have an impact on a project’s GHG intensity. The push for better environmental practices continues through difficult economic times for the industry, he suggests, because reducing GHG

CARTER HAYDU

intensity and water use on site will positively As in situ oilsands producers aim to reduce

modern user interface to define process

emissions and improve water treatment effi­

models, provide input parameters and vis-

ciency, the issue is not so much a shortage of

ualize results. The software quickly evalu-

is that collaboration and innovation is just

technology as it is the need for an integrated

ates technologies, using a reduced amount

as—if not more—important now than it was

approach to understanding the nexus between

of simulation to identify the most promis-

in a higher price environment. But the strong,

GHG emissions, water and operating costs.

ing options.

strong caveat is that this price environment is

That’s the view of Maryam Mahmoudkhani,

the tool’s integrated, holistic approach and

tems at ConocoPhillips Canada.

methodology has been contributed for sharing

“We need to have the tools in terms of a good approach for combining analysis for both water and greenhouse gas emissions PHOTO: CENOVUS

While specifically developed for Surmont,

GHG emissions technical lead in SAGD sys­

between the members of Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA). “Because all the thinking around it and

impact the bottom line for oilsands companies. “I would say that all the evidence to date

extremely challenging for these companies.” A SAGD SOLUTION THROUGH HYBRID MEMBRANES In SAGD, water reclamation and reuse is vital to operations, with about 60–70 per

reductions—both are tightly incorporated in

developing the framework is already there, I

cent of total operation costs related to steam

operating costs,” Mahmoudkhani says.

would assume [making it a generic tool] would

generation, according to Mohtada Sadrza-

not be very much work,” she says.

deh, assistant professor in the University of

At ConocoPhillips’ Surmont SAGD project, for example, she says custom software with

For COSIA chief executive Dan Wicklum,

in-house algorithms provides a fully flexible,

almost any solution proposed to decrease water

Alberta’s (U of A’s) department of mechanical engineering. Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 4 7


TECH_SERIES_WATER

“You can see that water limits the growth of the oilsands industry, and this is indeed the lifeline…. The solution to this [cost] problem is to have continuous improvement of the water treatment process.” He adds, “We at the advanced water re­ search lab at the U of A are working on membranes to decrease the costs of the current water treatment scheme.” Under the current process, bitumen is first recovered from produced water. After separation of trace amounts of oil and gas hydrocarbons, the de-oiled produced water mixes with make-up water and recycled boiler blowdown. It is sent to the conventional water treatment scheme that includes warm-lime softener to remove silica and ion exchangers to removed divalent ions. Finally, the so-called “boiler feedwater” returns to

for water treatment. The technology, which

contemporary polymeric membranes cannot

the steam generator.

was collaboratively piloted by five oilsands

resist temperatures above 45 degrees Celsius

producers, is expected to reduce water use and

for long-term operations.

od is it does not provide any treatment for the dissolved organic matter, and the salt concen-

GHGs while improving plant reliability. Researchers at the U of A are now working

Therefore, U of A researchers are developing mixed-matrix membranes, adding

tration even increases during the process,”

to infuse the thermal stability of inorganic

nanoparticles to polymeric membranes to

Sadrzadeh says. “In addition, only 90 per cent

membranes with the separation ability, large

increase thermal tolerance while maintaining

of the dissolved silica is removed. The organic

surface area and affordable price of organic

high separation performance. The synthesis

matter and the [remaining] silica causes

ones—the best of both worlds.

of robust and defect-free hybrid membranes

fouling of the steam generator, and it increases operation costs.” Membrane technology is expected to offer step-changes in water treatment. “If you use our membrane process after conventional techniques, we can remove almost

“The main concept is to actually incorporate functional nanoparticles into the polymer membranes in order to increase the thermal

is still in the laboratory phase of development, notes Sadrzadeh. “We are hopeful that in the next stage of

stability and also improve the anti-fouling

continuing that work we are moving toward

properties,” says Sadrzadeh.

the larger scale,” he says, adding this technol-

Inorganic ceramic, metallic and zeolite

ogy should reach a piloting phase within the

all the silica, divalent ions and organic matter,”

membranes might be better at handling the

next three years. If piloting goes well, then

Sadrzadeh says. “So we are just increasing the

high temperatures at which SAGD process-

these hybrid membranes could reach commer-

lifetime of the steam generator tubes and im-

affected water arrives to the treatment stage,

cial scale within five years.

proving the plant’s operating performance.”

but they are also unable to deal with irrevers-

Membrane technology could theoretically

Heat exchangers must reduce water tem­

ible fouling and must be changed regularly,

perature prior to membrane treatment, after

go one step further and replace the conven-

he notes, and they are expensive, too. These

which the water is reheated into steam, which

tional technique altogether. However, SAGD

are important considerations for oilsands

he notes is a costly step.

produced water has high concentrations of

producers, as they are particularly sensitive to

salt. Organic matter poses a fouling risk and

operating and capital costs.

produced water’s high temperature is incom-

On the organic side, polymeric membranes

“From the viewpoint of energy saving, in order to improve heat integration in SAGD plants, it is better to operate at higher

patible with the long-term use of a typical

are cheaper than their inorganic counter-

temperatures. Because of that, we are actually

polymeric membrane, according to Sadrzadeh.

parts. Due to their high flexibility, they can

going to make high temperature–resistant

be modularized to maximize surface area. In

polymeric membranes to reduce boiler feed-

last year, it became the first SAGD project to

addition, they can provide higher contami-

water heating requirements and greenhouse

incorporate ceramic (inorganic) membranes

nant rejection. Unfortunately, Sadrzadeh says,

gas production.”

When Surmont Phase 2 started operations

48 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

PHOTO: CENOVUS

“The problem with the conventional meth-


TECH_SERIES_WATER

Important WTDC fixed equipment will include its test separator, which will work in conjunction with bringing in process streams from the emulsion header and allow for chemical testing, level interface testing and diluent optimization work. A flotation cell will bring in oily produced water for chemical optimization trials. Perdicakis notes the test produced-water cooler will enable analysis of fouling mitigation and chemical treatment strategies, cleaning protocols, and different coatings— all aimed at either extending the runtime of produced-water coolers, or minimizing produced-water cooler cleaning costs. A test OTSG will handle about 3.4 cubic metres per hour of boiler feedwater. “It is meant to look at pushing the limits COSIA PARTNERS REMAIN COMMITTED

the WTDC is similar to undergoing a turn-

of what once-through steam generators are

TO DELAYED WATER TECHNOLOGY

around every year.”

capable of, looking at 90 per cent steam qual-

Along with capital and operating costs,

ity trials, looking at proved ways of measur-

When COSIA’s Water Technology Development

project participants equally own and share all

ing steam quality and really exploring what

Centre (WTDC) reaches full swing in 2019,

WTDC results, data and intellectual property,

are the technical operating envelope limits of

companies will be able to simultaneously pilot

says Perdicakis. A combination of Suncor

the OTSG.”

test a plethora of new technologies. Until then,

staff, secondi from the other participating

industry participants continue collaborating

producers and technology suppliers will con-

water, oily produced water, boiler feedwater

on development activities and the search for

duct WTDC­related tests. He told the recent

and analyzers. Crews will be able to artifi­

new ways to lower overall project expenses.

water conference: “All the participants re-

cially increase flow rates with a recirculation

mained committed to completing the project

pump. Further, according to Perdicakis, an

operations in 2017, but it has been delayed due

and collaborating on the subsequent annual

outdoor evaporator pad area will allow for

to challenging market conditions.

test plans.”

testing oversized equipment—evaporation

DEVELOPMENT CENTRE

The project was initially expected to start

The initial construction phase will cost

Potential WTDC benefits include constant

An instrument test loop will test produced

technologies, alternative steam generation

$165 million, says Basil Perdicakis, senior

access to live, real­time process fluids, which

technologies and anything else that cannot

research engineer and WTDC lead, oilsands

proponents believe is necessary to truly test

fit in the main building.

technical and upstream services with Suncor

new technologies’ performance. The WTDC

“We have done a lot of excellent work

Energy. Located at the company’s Firebag

is designed to also provide space, resources,

over the past year in developing a rigorous

SAGD project, Suncor will own and operate the

infrastructure, utilities and associated ex-

method to rank and prioritize the technol-

facility with five COSIA partners: Canadian

pertise required to meet associated oilsands

ogies that we plan to test at the WTDC,” he

Natural Resources, Devon Canada, Husky

innovations’ pilot-testing objectives.

says. “I think people can appreciate that this

Energy, Nexen and Shell Canada. “The WTDC participants are committed

The facility will accommodate five to eight

is a challenge to accomplish within one com-

medium sized pilots at a capacity of roughly

pany. Trying to get six companies to land on

to a five­year test program, and the intent

2.3 cubic metres per hour or one large pilot

how this was done was an interesting chal-

is that every year a set of pilots—whether

with a 23-cubic-metre-per-hour capacity. The

lenge, but one that we have worked through

the five to eight medium sized pilots or one

facility will import almost any processed fluid

this past year.”

large pilot—[is] commissioned, operated and

from the beginning of the central processing

decommissioned, and then the next-year set

facility through to the outlet—everything

this area, and it will really enable us to pri-

of pilots comes into the facility, and then that

from emulsion feeding the plant to the once-

oritize the technologies that we want to test

process keeps repeating itself. Operation of

through steam generator (OTSG) blowdown.

going forward.”

He adds: “We have made great strides in

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 4 9


TECH_SERIES_WATER

A NEW COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY MAY BE ABLE TO RETROFIT OILSANDS STEAM GENERATORS TO LOW EMISSIONS AT A LOW COST DEBORAH JAREMKO

A Seattle-based combustion company says it has signed a deal with a large oilsands producer to design and engineer its technology for potential retrofit at 40 once­through steam generators (OTSGs). ClearSign Combustion Corporation chief executive officer Stephen Pirnat says the tech­ nology, called Duplex, can lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at a non­prohibitive cost. “We’ve now determined that the paradigm that you have to pay a significant economic penalty for having clean air is really not true anymore,” Pirnat tells Oilsands Review. He says that Duplex technology allows people in the enhanced oil recovery market to get sub­5 ppm NOX low CO and retrofit exist­ ing low-NOX burner technology at a fraction of the cost of, for example, selected catalytic reduction systems. “The industry themselves and this particular client in western Canada is very excited about the fact that they can meet their forward-leaning approach to environmental stewardship [and] do it at a cost that is reasonable for their shareholders.” Pirnat was not at liberty to disclose the name of the producer, but indicated that there are fewer than five companies operating OTSGs in western Canada with a fleet this sig­ is validated, the two companies will jointly release a statement. “What’s really good for us is that the operators in western Canada are significant, 50 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

PHOTO: CENOVUS

nificant. He expects that after the technology


TECH_SERIES_WATER

well-funded, sophisticated companies, and we see a relationship with one of those companies as an opportunity to convert a large number of once-through steam generators in western Canada. We think the number of additional once-through steam generators in western Canada is several hundred, and that would give us an opportunity to really impact that entire market.” In the ClearSign system, fuel and air are mixed pre-combustion and then combusted in a Duplex tile. “A Duplex tile has a series of very small channels in it that allow the combustion to take place in a very precise way,” Pirnat says. “That combustion in those small channels allows better mixing and better heat transfer, and reduces the formation of NOX and CO and CO2. It has produced results that are phenomenal….

WE MAKE YOUR WORLD A SAFE PLACE LINED-PIPE SAFELY SOLVES YOUR FLUID HANDLING CHALLENGES With corrosive fluids, you need protection that won’t fail. That’s NGC. Our design and engineering expertise coupled with our innovative products give you solutions that can handle the most challenging environments in construction and fluid handling applications. Products like plastic lined pipe that prevents corrosion, safety shields that prevent sprayout, and slide bearings that ensure your equipment is safe from thermal expansion and vibration. In your world, it isn’t enough to be safe – you need to be NGC safe.

We have units successfully working on smaller once-through steam generators in the U.S., so we have a very high level of confidence that it will work in western Canada, and we’re really optimistic that this demonstration will result in multiple units within the client being retrofitted.”

Calgary: 403.295.3114 Toll-Free: 888.770.8899 www.ngc-ps.com

Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance has an active challenge out to external stakeholders and solutions providers to create a new high­efficiency boiler for thermal operations. Pirnat says there is a “high probability of that

CANADA’S GATEWAY TO THE WEST

portofthunderbay.ca

outcome” with his company’s technology. “In the case of the OTSG that we have oper-

» Furthest inland port in Canada; proximity to the Prairies

ating in the U.S., the client had proved that he gets about a one per cent efficiency advantage due to the radiant heat transfer. This par-

» Best choice for project cargo

ticular western Canadian client has gravitated towards that same opportunity and wants to

» Liebherr LHM 320 mobile harbour crane

measure the proved economic performance— meaning efficiency and fuel savings—associated with our technology. They are going to try to

» Direct rail access by CN and CP to/from Western Canada

replicate and capture the savings [of] the more efficient heat transfer,” he says. “Even though this market is somewhat

» Minimize handling, time and cost

depressed, we’ve also had discussions with manufacturers of once-through steam generators who, in simple terms, are saying, ‘well, if we can take advantage of this unique heat transfer, we could make the radiant section

Thunder Bay Port Authority T: (807) 345-6400 E: tbport@tbaytel.net W: portofthunderbay.ca

» Extensive staging area and storage

bigger and the convective section smaller, and we could make more efficient, smaller and less costly once-through steam generators.’” Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 5 1


Need oilfield services? FULL PAGE JWN AD 487551

SEARCH

|

COMPA R E

Utilize an ever-expanding database of oilfield service and supply companies (and a powerful set of search filters) to access over 13,000 companies in over 1,200 categories.

COSSD.COM

|

CONNECT


OILSANDS DATA O P E R AT I O N S BY T H E N U M B E R S

Alberta crude bitumen and synthetic crude production Crude bitumen 50,000

Bitumen royalty valuation at Hardisty, Alta.

JANUARY TOTALS

Synthetic crude

Calculated using NetThruPut monthly WCS index

2014 2015

$60

2015 2016

45,000

$50

40,000 40,638,300 BBLS or 54.4%

35,000

$40

34,058,300 BBLS or 45.6% 74,696,600 BBLS total

30,000

US$/bbl

Thousand bbls

2015 2016

2015

25,000

$30

20,000 $20

2016

15,000 10,000

$16.37

$10 46,428,700 BBLS or 58.7%

5,000

32,704,300 BBLS or 41.3%

0

$0

79,133,000 BBLS total D

J

F

M

A

M

J

J

A

S

O

N

D

J

A

Natural Gas: Spot prices at AECO trading hub in Alberta

J

J

A

S

O

N

D

Hot rolled coil

Structural sections and beams

$900

2015 2016

$3.00

F

M

Reinforcing bar 2015 2016

$800

US$/tonne

$2.50

C$/GJ

J

North American carbon steel prices

Monthly averages to Apr. 18, 2016 $3.50

M

$2.00 $1.50

$674

$700

$600

$514

$1.00

$1.02

$500

$0.50

$497

$0

$400

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

Mined oilsands bitumen production Current 3 month avg. (October 2015-December 2015)

Previous 3 month avg. (July 2015-September 2015)

BIGGEST MOVER Syncrude Canada - Aurora North & South

Suncor Energy Inc. - Base operations Imperial Oil - Kearl

-29,965 (From 221,831 to 191,866)

Syncrude Canada - Aurora North & South Canadian Natural Resources Limited - Horizon

TOTAL MINING AVERAGE

Shell Canada - Muskeg River

Current three months

Previous three months

Syncrude Canada - Mildred Lake 1,230,872.0

Shell Canada - Jackpine 0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

1,274,373.0

350,000

Production (bbls/d)

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 5 3


Alberta synthetic crude oil production

BIGGEST MOVER

Current 3 month avg. (October 2015-December 2015)

Previous 3 month avg. (July 2015-September 2015)

Shell Albian Sands Scotford Upgrader

Suncor Energy Inc. - Base operations

-25,691 (From 286,918 to 216,227)

Shell Albian Sands - Scotford Upgrader TOTAL MINING AVERAGE

Syncrude Canada Ltd. - Mildred Lake

Current three months

Canadian Natural Resources Limited - Horizon

977,595.0

CNOOC Limited - Long Lake 0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Previous three months

1,019,530.0

350,000

Production (bbls/d)

Top 10 thermal oilsands projects bitumen production Current 2* month avg. (January 2016-February 2016)

Previous 3 month avg. (October 2015-December 2015)

BIGGEST MOVERS ConocoPhillips Canada Limited Surmont

Suncor Energy Inc. - Firebag Imperial Oil Limited - Cold Lake

Canadian Natural Resources Limited Primrose & Wolf Lake

Cenovus Energy Inc. - Christina Lake Cenovus Energy Inc. - Foster Creek Devon Canada Corporation - Jackfish

Imperial Oil Limited Cold Lake

Canadian Natural Resources Limited - Primrose & Wolf Lake MEG Energy Corporation - Christina Lake

16,133.27

from 34,869.2 to 51,002.5

-12,475.08

from 100,137.1 to 87,662.05

10,683.8

from 154,865.9 to 165,549.7

TOTAL MINING AVERAGE

ConocoPhillips Canada Limited - Surmont

Current three months

Previous three months

Suncor Energy Inc. - Mackay River 1,028,575.95

Canadian Natural Resources Limited - Kirby South 0

50,000

100,000

*Data for March 2016 not available at press time

150,000

1,017,149.20

200,000

Production (bbls/d)

Lowest 10 thermal project steam to oil ratios Current 2* month avg. (January 2016-February 2016)

Previous 3 month avg. (October 2015-December 2015)

BIGGEST MOVERS

Cenovus Energy Inc. - Christina Lake

Andora Energy Corporation Sawn Lake

Andora Energy Corporation - Sawn Lake Pengrowth Energy Corporation - Lindbergh Pilot

Cenovus Energy Inc. Foster Creek

MEG Energy Corporation - Christina Lake

Pengrowth Energy Corporation Lindbergh Pilot

Devon Canada Corporation - Jackfish Canadian Natural Resources Limited - Kirby South Suncor Energy Inc. - Firebag

-2.35

from 4.49 to 2.21

0.22

from 2.79 to 3.01

0.2

from 2.08 to 2.2.8

TOP TEN AVERAGE

BlackPearl Resources Inc. - Blackrod

Current three months

Previous three months

Suncor Energy Inc. - MacKay River 1,234,567

Cenovus Energy Inc. - Foster Creek 0

*Data for March 2016 not available at press time

54 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Steam injected:oil produced

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

1,234,567


O I L S A N D S DATA

FirstEnergy oilsands, integrated and large cap indexes Oilsands

Integrated

Large cap

CHANGE SINCE APR. 21, 2015

Recorded until Apr. 21, 2016

120

INTEGRATED

19.72 11.44 13.91

2015 2016

100

$77.24 80

LARGE CAP

60

$77.90

40

OILSANDS 20

$19.58 0 MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

Index launched Jan 1, 2007. FirstEnergy complimentary indexes are available daily on the homepage at firstenergy.com. FirstEnergy Capital Corp. is a member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund and IIROC.

Crude oil differential: WTI-WCS MONTHLY AVERAGE

$13.80 15

15

10

10

5

5

APRIL 2016 $14.36

20

20

APRIL 2015 $10.41

25

2015 2016

MARCH 2016 $12.24

25

MARCH 2015 $13.49

Differential: West Texas Intermediate to Western Canadian Select (US$/bbl)

Recorded until Apr. 21, 2016

0

0 MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

FIRSTENERGY CAPITAL OILSANDS MARKETS UPDATE Is it possible for crude oil price differentials to actually become boring? Although the topic can be dry at times, the data itself is often a source of great stress and hand-wringing, especially for heavy crude oil producers. Volatility and seemingly random moves have often characterized this particular pricing component since the early 2000s. That behaviour finally seems to be going away, which is consistent with the kind of price stability that we have been preaching since early 2015. Since September 2015, the light-heavy crude oil price spread has been well contained in a range from US$10/bbl to US$20/bbl, and recent months have seen this spread

hold even tighter between US$10/ bbl and US$15/bbl. Far from being an aberration, we think this is the new normal for the industry, and it could very well persist in the current price range with low volatility for the next several years. The reasons for this tighter price range and lower volatility are now becoming better known and, as we have stated many times before, are related to the abundance of capacity to move crude oil to market by pipeline and rail. That second part of capacity, rail, has been vitally important in helping to cap the price spread as the approximate marginal cost of moving crude oil by rail from Alberta to many destinations in the U.S. will

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAR

rarely exceed US$15/bbl. We won’t belabour this point here, but suffice to say that rail transportation costs are acting as a rough ceiling on the price spread and should remain that way until much tighter capacity conditions arise later this decade, and perhaps not even before 2020. In the here and now, there has also been a substantial amount of field maintenance occurring, which has impacted between 150,000 and 300,000 bbls/d of heavy oil and bitumen production, further preventing too much supply from reaching market and keeping price differentials tight at a time of low seasonal refinery demand. As this maintenance period comes to a close, it will coincide with the seasonal uptick in U.S. refinery demand and should prevent any

APR

negative pressures from arising on the price spread. All of this is fairly self-explanatory, but what is vital to keep in mind is that with U.S. domestic supplies declining, the gates are opening further for Canadian crude to penetrate the U.S. market. This should bode well for Canadian heavy oil prices as refiners increase activity into the summer, demand for refined products looks to be increasing further, and Canada’s two main foreign competitors, Mexico and Venezuela, are facing production decline issues of their own. More stability, and perhaps even tighter differentials, should be on order for the balance of summer 2016. MARTIN KING, vice-president, institutional research, FirstEnergy Capital.

SOURCES: A LBERTA ENERGY REG U L ATOR; ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTR ATION; FIRSTENERGY C APITA L CORP; FLINT HI LLS RESOURCES LTD; MEPS INTERNATIONA L; NATUR A L GAS E XCHANG E INC . TOP ANA LYSIS

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 5 5


TRANSITION

C L E A N E N E R G Y C O M M E N TA R Y F R O M T H E P E M B I N A I N S T I T U T E

A more environmentally responsible oilsands sector is a more competitive sector

The climate leadership plan breaks the logjam and for the first time, positions Alberta and the oilsands sector as constructive participants in this dialogue.

As the dust settles on Alberta’s game-changing climate announcement of 2015, it is worth remembering that not long ago it would have seemed unfathomable for Alberta to be getting recognition for phasing out coal, pricing carbon, limiting oilsands emissions and reducing fugitive methane emissions. Alberta was locked in an outdated way of thinking: that action on climate change was inconsistent with economic prosperity. By ignoring the climate concerns of our customers and our neighbours, Alberta was undermining the very industry it was seeking to promote. Now, through a change of political will and economic reality, we find ourselves discussing what needs to be done to ensure future prosperity and well-being. Industry leaders recognize a more prosperous economy and acting on climate change are two sides of the same coin. As high-cost producers in a low-price world that is becoming increasingly carbon constrained, the oilsands sector stands to benefit from policy signals that can drive innovation and reduce costs. The Government of Alberta’s climate leadership plan is comprehensive and covers a broad range of sectors: it will bend Alberta’s emissions curve while putting the province on a path toward a more resilient economy. It sends the right set of signals that

56 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

can help Alberta advance toward a more responsible and competitive oilsands sector, improving the sector’s social licence, and it will create highskilled jobs right here in Alberta.

ALBERTA’S CLIMATE PLAN AND THE OILSANDS The Alberta climate plan includes three key elements for the oilsands sector: reducing emissions intensity to the level of best-performing facility, putting an economy-wide price on carbon and setting a sector-wide emissions limit. In developing regulations, the government needs a transparent process with effective stakeholder consultation resulting in optimal environmental and economic outcomes. Under the Specified Gas Emitters Regulation (SGER), each oilsands facility was required to improve its emissions intensity based on its historical emissions. So, while there are better performing operators, the higher-emitting facilities undermine the average intensity of the entire sector. The new approach will require facilities to improve their emissions to the level of the best performers or pay a price on carbon for any emissions over that benchmark. This means high-emitting facilities have a greater incentive to reduce emissions. Furthermore, the government can provide longer-term regulatory certainty by outlining the schedule

of emission intensity improvements that will be required over time. This vision can drive innovation and deployment of emissions reduction technologies. The plan also includes the application of a $30/tonne economy-wide price on carbon pollution. The previous government’s approach focused on industrial emissions sources while ignoring end-use emissions. Extending the coverage and setting a more effective price on carbon pollution allows for most cost-effective emissions reduction measures to be pursued. The onus is now on the federal government to extend the coverage of carbon pricing policy across the country, with an incrementally increasing schedule that can help Canada reach its climate goals. With Alberta’s climate plan, the province is one of North America’s leading jurisdictions and stands to benefit by being ahead of the regulatory curve. Finally, the government set a 100-megatonne (Mt) oilsands emissions limit that spares Alberta and Canada from a long-standing criticism of unmanaged oilsands growth. Current oilsands projects emit around 70 Mt per year. The limit allows current under-construction projects to proceed with some additional room for growth. If oil prices rebound to sufficient levels, approved but not yet under construction projects could

PHOTO: JOE Y PODLUBNY

SIMON DYER


TRANSITION

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

(MT)

140

will reach their limit by 2025, and without further action exceed the limit by 10 Mt in 2030. To ensure there is room for the oilsands to grow over the longer term, the sector must innovate and reduce its emissions.

A CLIMATE PLAN DESIGNED TO BUILD A MORE RESILIENT SECTOR AND ECONOMY

120

100

80

60

40

20 OPERATING

+CONSTRUCTION

+APPROVED

IN SITU SURFACE MINES

ECCC greenhouse gas emissions estimate of oilsands extraction projects by stage of development based on average oilsands project intensities (excludes upgraders) as of February 2016.

quickly raise the sector’s emissions to over 130 Mt. Adjusting for the latest economic outlook, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) forecasts suggest oilsands emissions

One change the climate plan may instigate is a focus on ensuring the very best projects proceed. This will optimize benefits to Albertans and lower environmental impacts. Governments should ensure the best resources are developed by the most efficient projects and through the most efficient processes. Past policies focused on maximizing recovery of even some of the most marginal deposits, resulting in activity with a lower priority placed on optimal environmental or economic outcomes. Exponential growth of the oilsands sector resulted in escalating labour and capital costs, while the cumulative environmental impacts either exceeded thresholds—in the case of woodland caribou—or were put on track to exceed environmental limits. This exposed the sector to growing domestic and international criticism, shrunk profit margins hedged against long-term high oil price assumptions and passed on growing liabilities to taxpayers. While the climate plan does not address other non-climate issues, it does help to put the sector on the path to becoming more resilient and competitive. A principal outcome of the three pillars of the climate plan for oilsands is innovation. Nearly 90 per cent of oilsands emissions are from stationary combustion sources, the energy the sector burns in order to extract and process bitumen. By improving efficiencies and switching to low-carbon energy sources, the energy demand, operating costs and emissions intensities improve in tandem. This is a positive outcome for the environment and it also helps the oilsands sector become more cost competitive.

The provincial climate plan creates opportunities and can set Alberta on a path toward building a cutting-edge clean economy. To reduce oilsands emissions intensity, highly skilled jobs will be required not only in ongoing technology research and development, but also in the field deployment of such technologies. Alberta’s young and highly educated population is well positioned to take part in these opportunities, which will pave the path to the jobs of the future. The evidence of market acceptance of the climate plan is abundant. At the UN climate conference in Paris, instead of being targeted for derision and positioned on the sidelines, Alberta and Canada played a role in shaping a new agreement that can have a significant impact on protecting our environment. The temperature has been lowered on discussions surrounding the approval of pipelines. While it’s fair to say the level of opposition will not dissipate overnight and local issues remain, the conversation has changed. If the federal government can now demonstrate how it will build on Alberta’s commitments to develop a national plan to meet its emissions reduction obligations, all sectors of Canada’s economy will benefit from the certainty provided. There is still a lot of hard work to do on implementation of the climate plan and the regulatory details. How will the revenue from carbon pricing be returned to Albertans? How does Alberta’s plan fit with Canada’s need for a plan to reduce emissions? How will the 100 Mt limit be enforced or new projects considered? But this is the start of that journey. The climate leadership plan breaks a logjam and for the first time, positions Alberta and the oilsands sector as constructive participants in this dialogue.

Simon Dyer is the Alberta director of the Pembina Institute and former director of the Institute’s oilsands program.

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 5 7


2016 and beyond: What’s next for service and supply?

Download the complete report at reports.jwnenergy.com.

After five years of over-investment in the global oil and gas industry, supply

HERE’S WHAT THE REPORT OFFERS:

outstripped demand in late 2014, leading to an almost 50 per cent decline

• Insight into the challenges being faced

in 2015. The service and supply sector has been hit hard as operators try to bring costs in line with current prices. JWN and partner Grant Thornton conducted a detailed review of the oilfield service and supply market and an exhaustive survey of service and supply company leaders that concluded in mid-January. The study included over 545 survey responses, 100 workshop attendees and 38 interviews, capturing the most comprehensive data on the health of the service industry, both in western Canada and on a global scale.

by the sector in today’s lower-for-longer commodity price environment and what opportunities still exist

• Information on how the industry is responding to cuts in field activity and pricing, survival plans currently in place and how the industry is preparing for an uncertain future

• Industry forecast: What 2016 and beyond has in store for the sector

Trusted energy intelligence.


GUEST COLUMN INSIGHTS FOR A BETTER INDUSTRY

CHANGING THE WAY WE WORK Being competitive means the oilsands needs to move from “as good as” to “better than” CAL WATSON

Most companies are reaching the limit of what they can cut in terms of capital and activity without significantly undermining their medium-term viability.

The oilsands industry competes on a global scale for investment capital and must sell its product into a global market. Long term, there are a number of structural challenges facing the industry as compared with other global hydrocarbon investment options, particularly U.S. tight oil. These include lower product price, higher transport costs, high operating costs, higher royalties and more stringent environmental requirements. All of these long-term capital investment challenges exacerbate the current challenges of the low oil price. It’s not enough for our industry to become “as good as” producers in other jurisdictions. We must become “better than” to overcome structural challenges and compete

for investment capital against other global opportunities. The challenge for Alberta producers is to find a “no regrets” path that delivers real cash benefits to ride out the near-term price-induced threat while also changing the way companies work to enable product and investment competitiveness in the medium and long term, when dollars become available for future exploration and production (E&P) investment. So far, to deal with the near-term challenges, the focus of Alberta producers, as with the global E&P community, has been to drastically cut opex and capex by reducing staffing and activity levels. With a lower-for-longer industry outlook in 2016, many companies are now focusing on two challenges, one near term and one longer term. The nearterm challenge is cash flow. Producers are seeking improvements that can yield a near-term cash position to maintain dividends and the integrity of the balance sheet. The longer-term challenge is changing how they work. There has been a great deal of reduction in activity and cost-cutting, but there has been little significant effort to transform work to be sustainably leaner with increased efficiency and productivity into the future. How do you work on both of these challenges together? This is the “no regrets” path that Alberta producers must chart. Most companies are reaching the limit of what they can cut in terms of

capital and activity without significantly undermining their medium-term viability. To avoid a significant rundown scenario, reserves have to be replaced and critical maintenance must be done. Many companies may be contemplating further layoffs, but the immediate cash flow benefits of that are limited, and it might actually take more cash in the short term. There are real limits to cost-cutting without transforming the underlying approach to work. You can’t simply cut your way to more efficient work execution or surveillance—you actually have to change the workflow processes, use data and key performance indicators (KPIs) to create business efficiencies, and enhance staff effectiveness. Productivity is key. Options to overcome these challenges include reliability, asset management, project cycle time, and leadership and culture.

RELIABILITY The biggest lever many companies have to pull from a cash perspective may be on the revenue side: improving reliability and uptime, decreasing production declines and increasing throughput. Even at historic low oil prices, the cash benefits of organic production growth may dwarf cost-cutting. You may be able to cut costs by another $1–$2/bbl, but even with current netbacks, each marginal barrel of production is worth potentially $4–$6/bbl. There are many things that go into reliability, including

clear process parameters, shift-toshift consistency, clarity of workflow and decision making, rigorous loss reporting and root cause analysis. In my experience the right focus on reliability—one that treats it as a human system, not just a technical system—can get plants to achieve consistent performance well beyond nameplate or best demonstrated. That is a strong argument for real cash today and a strong return on capital into the future. Higher reliability and more barrels of production also have a direct impact on driving down fixed and variable costs. At my previous producer, on the first thermal SAGD project, the operational excellence program we created working with Evolve Partners helped establish most of these reliability systems, which allowed our teams to reach 42,000 bbls/d (versus nameplate capacity of 35,000 bbls/d). These same systems were maintained and implemented at both the second and the third thermal projects, which accelerated their ramp-up and achieved world-class uptime and availability of 97.9 per cent and 98.5 per cent. Figure 1 illustrates the high degree of production variability, reduced uptime and subpar reliability in the initial years. Implementation of an operations excellence program created a learning environment with our field and technical staff which led to consistently high performance and yielded tens of millions in incremental value.

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 5 9


G U E S T C O LU M N

Reduced variability through operations excellence (figure 1) 40,000

1. Ramping up production

2. Learning the system

3. Troubleshooting to steady state

4. Stabilizing production

5. Shift to operations excellence

2011

2012

35,000

30,000

bbls/d

25,000

20,000

15,000

TURNAROUNDS

10,000

5,000

0

-5,000 2008

ASSET MANAGEMENT Reliability and asset management are obviously intertwined: the steadier you run, the fewer unplanned events and the less wear and tear you create. Effective, proactive asset management is a central pillar for reliability, including preventive maintenance, less break-in work, failure mode and effects analysis, and higher efficiency, consisting of robust planning and scheduling, plan loading and materials management. There are likely some significant near-term cash benefits to be found in the more judicious use of contract labour, effective material and resource loading, and wrench time enhancements. Again, a thorough, proactive asset management program can yield significant incremental cost savings and reliability benefits while making the plant a safer workplace. All this is made possible through better planning and scheduling, culminating in fewer scope changes. For the thermal SAGD projects I worked on, improved asset management resulted in annual turnarounds

2009

moving to a two-year and eventually a three-year cycle. Millions of dollars were saved with fewer and shorter turnarounds, but more importantly, tens of millions of additional revenue and annualized production was realized.

PROJECT EXECUTION Another opportunity for changing the way you work resides in project execution. Despite reductions in capital budgets, there is still a need for sustaining capital programs for wells and pad facilities. Leaning out the execution process to reduce cycle time and increase standardization of design can yield a double benefit of production and cost savings. A more rigorous, value-based approach to project selection can also help companies choose the right projects—and avoid the wrong ones. Even small plant projects primarily focused on safety, improved operability and higher reliability cross many internal disciplines (field operations, process engineering, facilities engin­ eering, procurement) that report to different leadership with different

60 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

2010

processes. As much as they work in teams, these different disciplines are siloed, which negatively impacts communication, planning, scope changes and collaboration. These issues create engineering rework between 20 per cent and 40 per cent, scope creep, schedule loss, quality assurance/quality control and incremental cost.

LEADERSHIP AND CULTURE You will need to motivate the people who have stayed on and are potentially doing the job of more than one person. Remember that the company has taken many people out of the organization but hasn’t actually changed “how” they work. In this constrained environment, fear will cause your people to be less innovative, with many just keeping their heads down and trying not to stand out or create any ripples in the organization. However, this is a time when you need to really maximize innovation and new ideas. To enable real change, you will need to find ways to take the fear out of the organization and create the right environment for real innovation.

This also creates longer-term benefits by getting your people to figure out how to do more with less, grow their skills and create an approach for ongoing productivity and continuous improvement. They will change the way they work by increasing collaboration, reducing cycle time, changing spans of control and creating improved efficiencies. In the early days of my first thermal project, as we were growing rapidly, we experienced too many levels of our organization focused on the day-to-day activities. Although these individuals were engaged and had a high level of ownership, most thought they needed to be connected to all daily happenings or needed information in case a superior asked. However, we found that implementation of a good production loss reporting system and exception reporting allowed senior field and sen­ior technical staff to turn their focus to longer-term, strategic issues while still having confidence that significant performance exceptions would be elevated appropriately.


G U E S T C O LU M N

Reduced variability through operations excellence (figure 2) 40,000

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

35,000

30,000

bbls/d

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0 0

12

24

36

48

Normalized months

Responsibility for daily and near-term activities was driven down to the right level in the organization to those who were closest and best able to maximize results. It is paramount that our industry adopts a culture of increased collaboration, both internal and external, to increase productivity, efficiency and net asset value. In 2009, as thermal SAGD production increased and a greater load was placed on the electrical power system, we incurred 17 power outages. This negatively impacted well health and plant stability and resulted in a production loss of tens of millions of dollars. Working together with two utility companies on joint reliability, system backup and new design planning, our outage time went from 3,600 minutes in 2009 to 600 minutes in 2010 and 3.5 minutes in 2011. Figure 2 shows all three SAGD projects normalized to the date of initial start-up, which allows us to compare production ramp-ups.

While reservoir heterogeneity limited Project 2’s peak production capability and differences in pad capital timing for the number of wells available per project at initial startup, the differences in project ramp-ups are undeniable. Creation of a learning organization was sustained across several years of multiple project timelines. Clear roles and responsibilities, accurate KPIs and production loss reporting to drive accountability, high reliability and maximizing value was achieved. It is possible that we could have achieved close to the same results eventually but I have to ask, can our industry afford to undertake a slow transformation and miss millions of revenue dollars? In my opinion, “changing the way we work” starts with leadership and culture.

Cal Watson is the retired vice-president of production with Devon Energy. He is currently an adviser to Evolve Partners, LLC.

SAGD asset planning and enhanced well pad development

TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2016 THE CALGARY PETROLEUM CLUB

SAGD projects operate for decades, requiring ongoing investment in well pad drilling and construction in order to sustain production rates. This panel discussion will examine producer strategies to optimize project development planning, including the effectiveness of their efforts to drive down costs.

REGISTRATION & BREAKFAST 7:30 a.m.–8:00 a.m. PROGRAM 8:00 a.m.–9:15 a.m.

Register online at: jwnenergy.com/events For inquiries: regsupport@jwnenergy.com or call 1.866.671.2778

TICKET PRICES: $40 PER SINGLE TICKET $300 FOR A TABLE OF EIGHT

EXCLUSIVE EVENT SPONSOR:

Q 2 2 0 1 6 • J W N E N E R G Y. C O M • 6 1


SECTOR WATCH Q U I C K- H I T I N S P E C T I O N O F O I L S A N D S I S S U E S

LL WE LL R E WE UC R D O O PR NJECT I

Temporarily shutting in thermal wells might not be as harmful as you think

ERS

ED VER O C E UNR Y OIL V A HE

CAPRO

CK

STEAM

STEAM

RISES A

AM

STE

MB CHA

ND HEA TS BITU

MEN

OIL & W ATER

PAT ROCHE

can say is there is not a lot of wells that have been shut in and reactivated—and certainly not enough to make a statistically meaningful study,” Carey told the CHOA conference. “But that isn’t the intent. The intent here for me was to examine trends and behaviour to see if they’re consistent with what you would expect from engineering judgment, and to see if anything big stands out.” He also noted the metrics can easily differ from project to project, depending on factors such as reservoir characteristics, why a well went down, whether the steam chambers are connected and whether the operator did anything to the well while it was down. Carey cited two specific SAGD examples: a well from Devon Canada’s Jackfish project and three wells from Suncor Energy’s MacKay River project. In the case of Jackfish, a well pair was shut in for 18 months after sand abrasion at the wellhead caused an oil spill in 2010. Adjacent well pairs were shut down for three months, then reactivated. Comparing oil production and steam to oil ratio (SOR) before and

62 • Q2 2016 • OILSANDS REVIEW

after the 18-month shut-in, Carey found “no impact whatsoever. In fact, this well pair went on to be an excellent performer with good [oil production] rates and a low SOR.” However, it wasn’t entirely clear whether this well might have been getting thermal support from the neighbouring wells that were reactivated after three months. At MacKay River, three SAGD wells were taken down for repairs and ended up being shut in for extended periods. “[The] wells came back on pretty well the way that they left off in terms of rates and SORs,” Carey said. “The first two wells continued to show operational and inflow issues in the longer term. But the fact remains that they came back on with little change, and the subsequent problems were not a result of the shut-ins.” Not all of the wells in Carey’s study had the same drop-off in oil production rates, but “all ended up doing not too badly” two years after reactivation. Also, while the initial SORs were much higher immediately after reactivation, the SOR two years later “was not unreasonably higher than” before the wells were shut in.

“The [shut-in] wells came back on pretty well the way that they left off in terms of rates and SORs.” — BRUCE CAREY, engineering adviser, Peters & Co.

BA SE I LLUSTR ATION: CENOVUS ENERGY

Investors have been asking Peters & Co. about the potential risks and rewards of shutting in thermal wells during the oil price downturn, so engineering adviser Bruce Carey did the research. While he stresses that the data he came back with is not sufficient to be “statistically meaningful,” it does indicate a surprisingly positive trend. He presented his findings at the Canadian Heavy Oil Association’s Slugging It Out conference in April. Carey began with a geoSCOUT search of thermal well shut-ins, using three screening criteria. First, the wells had to be produced for about two years to provide a good base for assessing any performance changes. Second, the wells had to be shut in for at least six months to increase the likelihood of seeing a response. And third, the well had to be put back on production for at least six months to provide a reasonably stable baseline to compare with previous performance. More than 1,700 well pairs survived the first screening criterion, but only 44 satisfied all three criteria. “With only 44 wells, the most statistically quantitative thing that I


What’s Next in SAGD Water Treatment?

We Are. WATER TECHNOLOGIES

We have listened to you... In 2016, Veolia will reveal the next step in the design of the produced water treatment plant. We’ve paid attention when you told us about the needs for your success on future projects and acting now. Our new intelligent plant design focuses on reducing project costs, installation time, and facility integration. Stay tuned. Canada USA Tel.: +1 403-261-0873 Tel.: +1 815-609-2000 www.veoliawaterstna.com water.info@veolia.com


Delivering Innovative Solutions

3rd Gen Modular ExecutionSM Fluor is a global leader in delivering integrated Engineering, Procurement, Fabrication and Construction (EPFC) solutions. Our innovative approach to modularization delivers cost and execution certainty for Clients in Alberta and around the globe. Our proprietary 3rd Gen Modular Execution drives the layout of facilities, resulting in significant plot size reduction and relocation of field hours to a modular yard – which integrates seamlessly as part of the EPFC solution. Customized to each project, Fluor’s innovative solutions are the benchmark for capital efficiency and predictability.

www.fluor.com ©2016 Fluor Corporation 3rd Gen Modular Execution is a service mark of Fluor. ADCA132816


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.