Anais - Interaction South America 09

Page 300

Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), December 1-4, 2003.

11. Endsley, M, et al. Modeling and Measuring Situation Awareness in the Infantry Operational Environment. United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1999.

6. Dixon, M. Combat ID and Force Traking – Technological Challenges and Perspectives. Centre for Opeational Research and Analysis, Defence R&D Canada. IV SEDOP. Julho, 2008.

12. Bolstad, C.A., Cuevas, H.M. Team Coordination and Shared Situation Awareness in Combat Identification. SA Technologies. Marietta, GA.

7. Natter, Mandy, Ockerman Jennifer, Baumgart Leigh. Review of Cognitive Metrics for C2. 13th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, C2 for Complex Endeavors.

13. Montgomery, D. Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001. 14. The R Project for Statistical Computing version 2.6.2. 2008. http://www.r-project.org.

8. Natter, M, Ockerman, J e Baumgart, L. Review of Cognitive Metrics for C2. 13th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, C2 for Complex Endeavors. 2008.

15. Bowers, C. A., Oser, R. L., Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team performance in automated systems. In R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications. (pp. 243-263). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

9. Miller, N E., Shattuck, L. A process model of situated cognition in military command and control. San Diego, 2004. 10.Stanton N, et al. Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, 2005.

9

297


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.