ICRISAT
Happenings Newsletter
13 November 2015 No. 1701
Photo: ICRISAT
Farmers visiting a variety testing plot in Sikasso region, Mali.
Farmers learn from each other in Mali
P
eer-to-peer learning among farmers is helping spread new concepts and techniques of sorghum and millet production among farmers in Sikasso and Mopti regions of Mali. It is also facilitating farmers’ access to production systems of these commodities. To facilitate cross-learning, a series of farmer exchange visits were held during a Farmer Field School (FFS) and involved not only the targeted producers but also producers from neighboring villages outside of the project facilitating these efforts. Since 2014, four technologies have been shared and adopted in FFSs. These include: ▪▪ Integrated management of Striga and soil fertilization: The intercropping of sorghum with cowpea, or millet with cowpea provides effective management against Striga and contributes to improved soil fertility. Cowpea has three notable impacts: it fixes atmospheric nitrogen, acts as a cover crop to help retain moisture and acts as a trap crop for management of Striga.
▪▪ Apron Star test: Apron Star is a seed treatment with fungicide-insecticide mixture for controlling downy mildew, damping-off diseases as well as for protection of seeds and seedlings against early season insect pests and soil-borne diseases. It has raised the production of millet and sorghum by upto 30% in Mali. Mr Debo Sanogo, producer and trainer at Kassanso, Sikasso region, had an interesting observation: “I made two plots: one with Apron Star and the second without Apron Star. I quickly noticed the difference between the two plots: almost all sown seeds have sprouted in the plot with Apron Star unlike the plot that has not received any dose. The difference was visible also in terms of growth, the vigor of the plants and yield. I am very happy with this product that has no adverse effect on the environment. I strongly appeal to all producers to adopt Apron Star that is easy to use and at an insignificant cost.” ▪▪ Varietal testing: In 2015, hybrids and improved varieties such as Fada, Sewa, Pablo and Grinkan Yeraewolo were compared to local varieties in Sikasso and Toroniou in Mopti. After nearly two years of testing, farmers have to page 4...4
Short-duration pigeonpea a boon to farmers of Rajasthan, India
F
armers in the Indian state of Rajasthan consider short-duration pigeonpea varieties a boon as the crop requires fewer inputs, thrives well even under limited water conditions due to its deep root system, and matures in 120 days. This gives farmers the opportunity to grow postrainy season crops like wheat, chickpea and mustard. Earlier, farmers avoided pigeonpea due to its long maturity period. But introduction of short-duration varieties in the region have encouraged more farmers to grow pigeonpea. Villages of Jaipur district (Padasoli and Badwa) are known as pigeonpea villages since traditional crops like pearl millet have been replaced by pigeonpea.
Photo: ICRISAT
Farmers at the pigeonpea farmers field day at Malupada, Karauli.
Karauli district of Rajasthan was originally a traditional area for pigeonpea. But over the last two decades farmers have stopped cultivating pigeonpea due to unavailability of quality seed. A progressive farmer Mr Himmat Singh of Malupada village of Karauli was selected to demonstrate the short-duration variety, ICPL 88039, developed by ICRISAT.
At the field day at Malupada village there were 200 women farmers among the 500 farmers who participated. To encourage more farmers to adopt improved pigeonpea technology in their fields, awards for the ‘Best Pigeonpea Famer’ were awarded to: Mr Gangashyam Singh (Satwas, Bharatpur), Ms Krishna Devi (Badwa, Jaipur), Mr Mool Chand Jat (Kherli Pichnot, Alwar), and Mr Gopal Sharma and (Nangal Bela, Dausa) for achieving high yields.
for Rajasthan. Further, emphasizing the role of women farmers in agriculture, she encouraged women to take up pigeonpea cultivation in their fields, and also get involved in various activities like seed production, post-harvest processing and other value addition activities like weaving baskets out of dried stalks of pigeonpea. She urged male farmers to support their wives and daughters. Convinced by the returns earned by the farmers in Jaipur district, 150 women from four other districts have expressed their willingness to take up pigeonpea seed production on their farms.
During the 2015 cropping season, more than 1,500 ha has been covered in nine districts of Rajasthan (Jaipur, Dausa, Alwar, Karauli, Sawai Madhopur, Bharatpur, Tonk, Dhaulpur and Ajmer) by the short-duration pigeonpea variety. Under the project, the area under pigeonpea in Rajasthan has expanded to more than 5,000 ha and its performance has encouraged more farmers to adopt this variety.
Mr Vijay Kumar, Senior Manager, ICRISAT, explained the advantages of early pigeonpea and dual cropping system. On this occasion, farmers shared their experiences in pigeonpea cultivation. Officers from Department of Agriculture, Odisha, were also invited to the field day. Mr Gangadhar Das, Joint Secretary, Agriculture, Mr NC Swain, Consultant and Mr BK Dey, Agronomist from Odisha, visited pigeonpea fields and saw the performance of the pigeonpea varieties. They requested ICRISAT to demonstrate this improved pigeonpea technology in the state of Odisha as well.
Chief Guest Dr SJ Singh, Local Coordinator and Director, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute (RARI), Durgapura, Jaipur, encouraged farmers to take advantage of improved pigeonpea technology developed by ICRISAT.
Visits to the pigeonpea fields were organized by Mr Uttam Chand, Scientific Officer, ICRISAT, and team, giving farmers an opportunity to see on-farm performance and also interact with scientists.
Dr CV Sameer Kumar, Coordinator and Senior Scientist, ICRISAT, elaborated on the package of practices in pigeonpea cultivation, selection of suitable variety for dryland conditions of Rajasthan. He explained the ‘one village one variety’ concept for seed production and also about farmers’ participatory seed production program, which can help farmers get quality seed at village level.
The field day was organized on 15 October by ICRISAT in collaboration with RARI, Durgapura. g
Dr Anupama J Hingane, Principal Investigator and Special Project Scientist, ICRISAT, briefed farmers about project activities and improved pigeonpea cultivation technology along with short-duration varieties and hybrids developed 2 ICRISAT HAPPENINGS 13 NOVEMBER 2015 1701
Project: Enhancing the livelihoods of resource-poor farmers of Rajasthan through the introduction of eco-friendly pigeonpea varieties Investor: Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY), Department of Agriculture, Government of Rajasthan Partners: Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute (RARI), Durgapura, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, and ICRISAT CGIAR Research Program: Grain Legumes
Fortnightly column
Village Dynamics Insights
Lack of formal credit constraining rural transformation
The situation is particularly acute in the eastern and semi-arid tropic (SAT) regions of India where noninstitutional financial agencies accounted for as much as 44% of the outstanding credit in 2012-2013. Access to financial services has been shown to be critical for smallholder farmers in these regions. “Farming is not remunerative for smallholder farmers as they are not getting sufficient income surplus from farming to meet their day-to-day expenses for the whole year. In such case, there is nothing left for purchasing inputs and making investments in farming the following year. In the absence of any assured credit from banks, they go to private moneylenders, who readily provide money, but at very high interest rates,” according to Dr Ranjit Kumar, Principal Scientist, Economics and VDSA Eastern India Coordinator.
VDSA data profile Data for the study was collected from 1,194 households under the VDSA program. In eastern India, the states of Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha were selected and in the SAT region, the states of Karnataka, Maharashtra and the then undivided Andhra Pradesh were selected across the years Distribution and access of rural households to agricultural credit in the regions.
Region
Share of households Households (% of agri-credit) availing any Survey agri-credit* Formal Informal year (% of total) sources sources
Not availing any agri-credit
2010
35.2
62.7
46.7
64.8
Eastern 2011 region 2012
38.3
57.3
53.0
61.7
32.7
67.3
45.9
67.3
2013
28.5
70.0
35.7
71.5
2010
72.2
73.9
67.0
27.8
2011
73.7
70.6
68.0
26.3
2012
73.7
75.2
71.5
26.3
2013
73.9
69.9
68.2
26.1
SAT region
Source: VDSA Survey data *Agri-credit includes loans taken for crop cultivation, purchase of tractor & farm implements, purchase of livestock, drilling borewells or digging wells.
Project: Village Dynamics in South Asia
This work is now incorporated as part of the
RESEARCH PROGRAM ON
Policies, Institutions and Markets
60 No of Households
recent study of credit opportunities for rural farmers in India has shown that financial institutions are failing to extend credit at subsidised interest rates to smallholder farmers, as emphasised by the government. Poor access to formal credit (due to inappropriate land records, cumbersome formalities and long delays) force households to take loans from informal sources such as private moneylenders who often charge interest rates ranging from 60-120% per annum. This is seriously hampering household income growth in these areas.
SAT
50
Eastern India
40 30 20 10 0
6-12
3-6
12-24 Rate of Interest
24-36
36
Households availing credit from formal sources. 120 No of Households
A
SAT
100
Eastern India
80 60 40 20 0
3-6
6-12
12-24
24-36 36 Rate of Interest
48
60
120
Households availing credit from informal sources.
2010 to 2014. In each state, 160-180 households across two districts were surveyed regularly. The study also highlights the precarious situation of formal agricultural credit in the eastern states when compared to the SAT states. The proportion of households in eastern states availing any agri-credit was half that of the SAT states. Many of the households in the eastern states avail no credit from any source and therefore, use low inputs in production relying on their own resources. Access to credit would have dramatically impacted the ability of these households to achieve a significant improvement in their household income during this period.
Conclusion “Governments have been emphasising that rural credit should grow - and a lot of money has been pushed in this direction. However, this institutional credit is not reaching smallholder farmers,” says Dr Kumar. Aside from the low number of bank branches in the region, financial institutions still require lenders to have some collateral – which often smallholders cannot provide. There is an urgent need for government to develop a strategy whereby these farmers who can only lease land are also able to avail institutional credit. Reference: Truncated Access to Institutional Agricultural Credit as a Major Constraint for Rural Transformation: Insights from Longitudinal Village Studies by Ranjit Kumar, V Surjit, Cynthia Bantilan, MA Lagesh and Umesh S Yadav, Research ProgramMarkets, Institutions and Policies, ICRISAT. This paper is to be presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of Agricultural Economics Research Association in Mumbai, 2-4 Dec 2015. g
Investor: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Partners: IRRI & Socio-Consult, Bangladesh, ICAR-RCER, IIWM, NIAP and ICRISAT, India ICRISAT HAPPENINGS 13 NOVEMBER 2015 1701 3
Farmers learn from each other... from page 1 accepted the improved varieties in view of the advantages linked to the use of hybrid seeds and improved production techniques. ▪▪ Microdosing: This is a practice that encourages smallholder farmers to use small amounts of fertilizer at critical stages of crop growth to maximize yields. The overall input requirements are reduced thus helping resource poor farmers. “Traditionally, for a hectare of millet/sorghum, a farmer uses three fertilizer bags (two bags of Di-Ammonium Photo: ICRISAT Phosphate [DAP] and one Farmers in Sikasso region, in front of plots with Apron Star test and without Apron Star during bag of urea) ie 150 kg in total. an exchange visit. With microdosing, 35 kg of fertilizer are sufficient to cover one hectare. This (ToT and secondary plot) are season-long – from land preparation to harvest. greatly increases the economic value of production,” said Mr Daniel Kamate, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) “If your crop just feeds you for a season, it’s time for you to supervisor, Koutiala. Microdosing is now leading to large change jobs,” said Mr Makono Kone, sub-sector chief of the benefits in yields and incomes. However, this technique National Directorate of Agriculture, Sikasso, to farmers in has high labor requirements. the municipality of Fama (Sikasso). FFS - a group-based learning process: FFS brings together concepts and methods from agroecology, experimental education and community development. During FFSs, farmers carry out experimental learning activities that help them understand new technologies and the ecology of their field.
The knowledge gained from FFS main plots, through ToT (Training of Trainers) will be replicated by participants (FFS Facilitators) in their own villages. A ToT is organized around 5 villages, each village providing 10 participants. These people organize in groups of five each, with each group forming a replication plot having technology similar to the main plot. Each group will reach out to between 25 and 30 participants who meet every two weeks for sharing information about different topics related to the production of millet/sorghum. The training on both levels
The exchange visits were held from 27 September to 4 October and were organized as part of the Africa RISING large-scale Diffusion of Technologies for Sorghum and Millet Systems in Mali (ARDT_SMS). The field days were organized by CRS (a project partner). g Project: Africa RISING’s large-scale Diffusion of Technologies for Sorghum and Millet Systems (ARDT_SMS) Investor: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Partners: Catholic Relief Services (CRS), Compagnie malienne de développement des textiles (CMDT), Aga Khan Foundation (AKF), Institut d’Economie Rurale (IER), Association Des Organisations Professionnelles Paysannes (AOPP), European Cooperative For Rural Development (EUCORD), Office De Radiodiffusion Television du Mali (ORTM), Mali Agricultural Market Trust (MALIMARK) and ICRISAT
ICRISAT is a member of the CGIAR Consortium About ICRISAT: www.icrisat.org ICRISAT’s scientific information: EXPLOREit.icrisat.org DG’s Journal: dgblog.icrisat.org