The gatekeepers
407
familiar with it." What passes for science is a sick joke. Most of its efforts are not aimed at answering the big questions of existence because there is little money or sponsorship in that. Science is geared to finding a new drug or industrial technique that will generate a fortune for its funders. It's a money-making machine and not inspired by an open-minded spirit of discovery. As a Congressional Committee established as far back as the 1950s, those funders of "scientific" research in US universities, the tax-exempt foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation, were dictating what the outcome of that research would be before it had even started!! Without such an agreement, the funding was not handed over (see ...And The Truth Shall Set You Free). This policy is to suppress an undesired outcome because, in Carl Sagan's words: "All inquiries carry with them some element of risk. There is no guarantee that the universe will conform to our predispositions." The whole "scientific" system is structured to suppress knowledge, not advance it, because the Illuminati is desperate for us to remain in ignorance of who we are and the nature of life. If enough people knew the truth, their game would be up. Scientists, and their offshoot, the medical profession, are some of the most concrete-minded of the gatekeepers. They are also some of the most important because they suppress the nature of multi-dimensional existence and that is guaranteed to keep us in the Matrix. They are feted as experts and yet they are, like so many teachers, journalists, and politicians, astonishingly uninformed. Their whole structure is designed to keep them compartmentalised in their "speciality" so they are partial masters of one trade and jack of none. Only when we connect the dots can we begin to see the picture, but most scientists spend their entire careers specialising on one dot. In the UK, one of the most infamous gatekeepers in my experience is one Dr Susan Blackmore, who is constantly wheeled out by the media to dismiss any claims of the "paranormal". The more that people experience such phenomena, the more ludicrous Dr Blackmore's "explanations" become. But, of course, because she is an "academic" with a title she is seen as more credible than the people actually having the experience. In the New Scientist magazine of November 4th 2000, she was again given the freedom to rubbish all other scientists who say the mind and brain are not the same thing. The arrogance with which her padlocked mind dismisses anything outside the official "scientific" norm is a wonder to behold. We, the people, are the only ones who can break this stranglehold on true science. We need to stop being impressed by titles and letters after someone's name and focus purely on the evidence. We are encouraged to believe that a scientist must know better than a "layman" by definition. He's a scientist, isn't he? The track record of scientists talking complete cobblers is simply enormous and goes back to the very start of the "scientific method". While I was writing this book, an official report in the UK exposed how government "scientists" and "experts" had misled the British public for years about the so-called mad cow disease being transmitted to humans through eating beef. The scientists said it could not be passed to humans and so safety measures were not taken when any idiot could see that the chances were high that it could. I remember saying so on a