Feb 11, 2016

Page 1

Should guns be this easy to buy? Page 2: In support of background checks

Volume 59, Issue 6

“Planet Earth is blue” about Bowie

Taylor Lim makes it big in Big Apple Page 5: Junior dances her way to the top

February 11, 2016

Page 6: Saying goodbye to a timeless artist

We are born to seek the truth! www.cvhsolympian.com

Fifteen students suspended after massive fight By Anastasia Le Staff Writer

Gavin Halloran / Staff Writer

Obama takes aim at illegal gun sales By Jessica Mi Opinion Editor

Newton, Connecticut. Charleston, South Carolina. Colorado Springs, Colorado. San Bernardino, California. These seemingly random places are connected by tragic event: mass shootings. According to the University of Alabama Department of Criminal Justice, 31 percent of the world’s mass shootings occur in the U.S., compared to the five percent of the world population that our country accounts for. Shootingtracker.com defined a mass shooting as, “incidents where four or more victims are shot,” and the website documented more mass shootings in 2015 than days of the year. This means that on average, one or more mass shootings occurred each day, somewhere in the US. These events have evoked a profound reaction in the emotions of the public, but Congress has done very little to tighten gun control laws in the US in light of

these events. President Barack Obama announced a new executive order on Jan. 5, 2016 concerning gun laws. In a public announcement, Obama shed tears as he called for tighter background check requirements and effectiveness as well as education and enforcement of gun control laws at a state level. Many politicians, mostly Republicans, opposed Obama’s proposals, claiming that they would infringe upon the Second Amendment. Obama insisted that his actions are “not a plot to take away everybody's guns." Obama also believes, “that we can find ways to reduce gun violence consistent with the Second Amendment." Students at CVHS have many differing perspectives and experiences surrounding this issue. Junior John Anthony uses guns recreationally and said, “The recreational use of guns is perfectly fine, but there should be limits on who can access guns.” On the other side of the spec-

trum, senior Jackson Bores is not a gun user and stated, “It’s way too easy to buy a gun in America. In addition to stronger background and psychological tests, mandatory classes on gun usage, storage, and other overall safety procedures need to be implemented.” Despite the implementation of new background checks, weapons could still be obtained illegally through places such as the black market. The accessibility of weapons is not limited to legal markets. However, 80 percent of the weapons all mass shooters from 1982-2012 possessed were obtained by legal means, a statistic that will undoubtedly continue and cause more fatalities unless something is done to limit the accessibility of firearms. Obama’s proposal support from the Democratic Party and opposition from the Republican Party. The fate of gun control, andof the nation, lies with the 2016 presidency.

an increase of about $300 per student. Brown’s state budget also proposes more spending for health care, transportation, and state infrastructure. “This budget, relative to the budgets of the last decade and a half, is in good shape,” said Brown at the state Capitol. Although this increase is a beginning in improving student education, it may not be enough. According to Assemblyman Bill Quirk, California is not spending enough on K-14 education even with Brown’s proposal. “We are not spending the

money we should on universities and even on K-14, where things have gone up,” said Quirk in an exclusive Olympian interview. “Anyone who says we have a surplus is misreading the numbers.” The budget’s goal is to improve education from preschool to college. Whether or not this budget will make a large difference, it is an improvement that may lead to further increases. The budget plan for school spending is not the only topic concerning the state on education.

A large fight broke out in front of the library on Jan. 21. Fifteen students were suspended for their actions in the after-school scuffle that caused two serious injuries and many minor ones. According to school officials, many of the students involved were of Korean, Chinese, or Filipino descent, and some were English language learners. All students physically involved were boys. Both CVHS video cameras and students’ phone videos helped the administration to determine what happened and identify the students involved. “Several threads” of conflict were present before the fight, and the fight was most likely set off when a girl involved with a member of one group felt “disrespected” by the other group. “Both sides felt victimized. Both sides had multiple opportunities to disengage,” said Assistant Principal Jesse Hansen. Onlookers captured the event on video using their cell phones. The fight happened right after school let out, and many students were still on campus to see the conflict, prompting the news of the event to spread like wildfire throughout social

media. The videos show that the fighting began outside of the gates by the library. The initial conflict began in a condensed group before more boys got involved in the chaotic scene. Boys first few punches were thrown on the concrete steps, and as the participants got up, it seemed as if the fight was a quick dispute. One video moves down the steps to the brick wall as a small group tried to push one boy into the surrounding bushes. A car on Santa Maria Avenue came to a screeching halt when the fight spread onto the street. The fighting slowed to a stop as staff members showed up to control the situation. There were no arrests. Two boys were injured seriously enough for a CVHS nurse to encourage a hospital visit, and to the administration’s knowledge, one did. CVHS suspended 13 of the students for five days. One boy was suspended for one day, and another for two days, being considered less culpable because they were “pulled into the fray,” Hansen said. The suspensions took place during finals week, but the district decided to allow the

See FIGHT: page eight

Evaluating Governor Brown’s budget plan for California Public schools hope to gain more funding By Mia Babasyan Staff Writer

Governor Jerry Brown recently passed a proposal to increase education funding. Brown is hoping to spend $10,591 per student in 2016-17,

See BUDGET: page eight

Mia Babasyan/ Staff Writer

Jacob Schoenfeld interviews Senator Kevin De León.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.