sphere of traditions and narratives, these are the type of amalgamated caricatures that provide the most lasting impact. The Textual Azazel Azazel. Naming angels seems to have been a relatively recent phenomenon in Second Temple Judaism, and is found only in Daniel in the canonical literature been wary of naming angels, wanting to avoid the danger of polytheistic misinterpretation, especially since systematic angelology was the child of the supwe might also note that Job’s adversary, Satan, long supposed as an antecedent to this court, and a product of this depiction of divine beings. It seems, then, that a
though the mechanics of the syncretism are a matter of scholarly debate. Asael lurgical content of the knowledge he revealed, in keeping with the pattern of Man for All Generations taking good things God has made and transforming them into instruments of Man for All Generations
According to some scholars, equating the two was not solely because of philoAzazel was thus not a mere derivative or misspelling of Asael, but rather a scapegoat be chosen by lots and sent to Azazel, perhaps suggesting a demon
be they as angels, demons, or deities in and of themselves, and certainly, the -
3