Pieces of the Puzzle- Full Report

Page 260

APPENDIX C. NAEP ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY CONT’D Pieces of the Puzzle

Table C.3 Average scale scores of grade 4 public school students in the NAEP mathematics assessment, overall and by selected characteristics, based on the full population estimates, by district, 2007 African Districts

Overall

Eligible for

English

American

Hispanic

National School

Students with

Language

Students

Students

Lunch Program

Disabilities

Learners

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Atlanta

223

1.0

216

1.1

222

4.3

215

1.1

202

4.5

Austin

238

1.2

223

1.4

230

1.1

227

1.0

216

3.1

224

1.3

Boston

231

1.3

224

1.5

228

1.8

228

1.4

208

2.9

225

2.6

Charlotte

242

1.0

229

1.1

230

2.8

229

1.1

213

3.1

225

3.6

Chicago

218

1.1

212

1.5

217

1.6

214

1.0

192

2.8

203

2.2

Cleveland

210

1.7

205

1.7

206

6.1

210

1.7

177

4.5

195

7.0

District of Columbia

212

0.9

207

0.9

213

2.2

205

0.9

183

2.5

203

2.6

Houston

232

1.2

222

1.9

232

1.3

229

1.2

202

3.3

228

1.6

Los Angeles

220

0.9

216

2.1

216

1.0

216

1.1

195

3.6

208

1.0

New York City

235

1.3

227

1.6

230

1.2

233

1.4

213

2.1

216

2.0

San Diego 232 1.5 220 3.6 221 1.5 222 1.5 193 3.5 216 1.5 SE=standard error — Too few cases for a reliable estimate. † Not applicable. Source: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2007 Mathematics Assessments: Full Population Estimates.

Table C.4 Average scale scores of grade 8 public school students in the NAEP mathematics assessment, overall and by selected characteristics, based on the full population estimates, by district, 2007 African Districts

Overall

Eligible for

English

American

Hispanic

National School

Students with

Language

Students

Students

Lunch Program

Disabilities

Learners

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Atlanta

255

1.7

252

1.6

250

1.7

217

5.6

Austin

280

1.2

262

2.4

268

1.7

264

1.5

243

3.1

242

3.2

Boston

272

1.6

259

1.9

266

2.6

266

1.7

239

5.0

236

5.7

Charlotte

281

1.1

266

1.4

261

3.1

263

1.3

252

3.3

250

4.4

Chicago

258

1.9

246

2.5

262

1.8

254

1.8

223

4.0

236

4.7

Cleveland

248

1.4

246

1.8

247

3.8

248

1.4

205

8.2

District of Columbia

243

1.4

241

1.4

246

3.8

237

1.8

204

4.8

221

6.4

Houston

270

1.4

260

1.8

267

1.2

264

1.4

228

5.0

237

3.1

Los Angeles

256

1.2

243

2.6

252

1.4

253

1.3

216

3.6

229

2.1

New York City

269

1.8

258

2.2

262

2.5

266

1.6

234

3.4

235

3.1

San Diego 270 1.5 254 2.9 257 2.1 257 2.6 224 4.4 234 2.5 — Too few cases for a reliable estimate. † Not applicable. Source: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2007 Mathematics Assessments: Full Population Estimates.

C-7 258

Council of the Great City Schools and the American Institutes for Research

PIECES OF THE PUZZLE: FACTORS IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF URBAN SCHOOL DISTRICTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.