Visual Preference Survey

Page 1

Visual Preference Survey Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Design Spring 2010


Survey method  10 slides, 9 participants  5 perceptual qualities, and walkability: imageability, enclosure, human scale, transparency, complexity and walkability  Rating scale 1-7 for each quality  Purpose: assess influence of qualities on perceived walkability.


Results: Descriptive  Averages of ratings for the five qualities and walkability Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

#

#

#

#

#

Com.

Walk. All

#

 Average of all ratings Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

#


Average scores: Slide 1

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

3.86

4.86

5.14

4.57

4.57

3.86

4.48


Average scores: Slide 2

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

5.00

5.71

5.43

5.43

6.57

6.43

5.76


Average scores: Slide 3

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

3.57

5.14

4.14

4.71

4.86

3.43

4.31


Average scores: Slide 4

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

3.43

3.43

4.14

4.00

4.29

3.00

3.71


Average scores: Slide 5

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

5.00

3.43

3.57

4.29

4.14

4.29

4.12


Average scores: Slide 6

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

2.57

3.43

3.29

2.43

4

2

2.95


Average scores: Slide 7

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

4.57

5.14

4.71

4.86

5.43

5

4.95


Average scores: Slide 8

Image. Encl.

H.Sc.

Tran.

Comp. Walk.

All

4.29

4.57

3.86

3.71

4.29

4.86

4.43


Average scores: Slide 9

Imag. Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk. All

6.57

6.29

6

6.43

6.86

6.86

6.5


Average scores: Slide 10

Imag.

Encl.

H.S.

Tran.

Com.

Walk.

All

4.14

3.71

3.29

3.71

4.57

4.71

4.02


Descriptive summary Slide 9 scored the highest, at 6.5. Slide 2 scored second highest, at 5.76.


Multiple regression results  Multiple regression analysis of all perceptual qualities on walkability: R-square of .616  61.6% of the change in walkability score can be explained by ratings of the five perceptual qualities.


Individual influences  Human scale shows the strongest individual correlation at .4693.  Enclosure and complexity are close, at . 4667 and .4419.


Human scale and walkability


Enclosure and walkability


Complexity and walkability


Multiple regression results: square

R-

Std. Error of the Model 1

R

R Square .785

a

.616

Adjusted R Square

Estimate

.586

a. Predictors: (Constant), Complexity, Enclosure, Human Scale, Transparency, Imageability

.940


Multiple regression results: Coefficients  Coefficients: tell the direction (+/-) of independent variable effect on the dependent variable, and which have greater effect when controlling for all variables.  Enclosure has the greatest impact (.330)  Enclosure is significant at the .05 level,  Human scale and complexity are significant at . 10 level  .10 level: 10% confidence in the null hypothesis.


Results: Coefficients Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1

B

Std. Error

(Constant)

1.251

.413

Imageab ility

-.034

.137

Encl osure

.268

Human Sca le

Coefficients t

Beta

Sig. 3.032

.004

-.034

-.246

.807

.101

.330

2.664

.010

.227

.125

.229

1.814

.074

Tran spare ncy

.119

.132

.117

.90 2

.371

Co mple xity

.259

.142

.266

1.823

.073

a. Dep e nde nt Variab le: Wa lka bility


Key results  61.6% of change in walkability score is explainable by perceptual qualities  Enclosure, human scale, complexity were the most influential  Slide 9 highest score: 6.5  Slide 2 second highest: 5.76

Slide 9

Slide 2


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.