Diferencias entre comites de ética públicos y privados

Page 11

PERSONA Y BIOÉTICA • JULIO - DICIEMBRE 2010

4. Potter VR. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. England: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs; 1971. 5. Lavery JV, Grady Ch, Wahl ER, Emmanuel E. Ethical issues in International Bioemdical Research. A casebook. Oxford University Press; 2007. 6. Kerlinger F, HB Lee. Investigación del Comportamiento. Métodos de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales. 4 ed. México: McGraw Hill Interamericana; 2002. pp. 541-543. 7. Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Metodología de la investigación. 2 ed. México: McGraw Hill; 1991. pp. 184.

186

8. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups. A practical Guide for applied Research. 4 ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009. pp. 219. 9. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. pp. 208. 10. Guides World Health Organization. Surveying and Evaluating Ethical Review Practices. Operational Guidelines for ethical committees that review biomedical research. Geneva: 2002. 11. OMS. Guías para Comités de ética en Investigación. Génova; 2002.

I S S N 0 1 2 3 - 3 1 2 2 • p e r s . b i o é t . • Vo l . 1 4 • N ú m e r o 2 • P á g s . 1 7 6 - 1 8 6 • 2 0 1 0


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.