5 minute read

Opinion

SAM DUFFY

OPINION EDITOR

The Olympic Games, since their emergence from antiquity, have been a spectacle. The incredible athletes never fail to arouse the world’s attention as we look on, bewildered by their prowess. But despite this fact remaining unchanged, Olympic Games viewership is down this year in every country except the host nation, China. And while defenders of the Olympics rush to an explanation that maintains time-zones are to blame, because events are happening while much of the world sleeps, there is another reason this Olympics is receiving less attention than its previous iterations. The reason is, of course, that it has become difficult for viewers to divorce the athletic spectacle from the totalitarian backdrop. The Olympics, in their modern form, were created to encourage unity amongst nations, and allow nations who would normally not get along to build comradery outside the stodgy world of international politics. There are definitely some notable examples of Olympic Games causing more controversy than peace, but in theory unity remains the goal.

And in the case of these Olympics, it’s very hard to believe that unity is the goal because the host nation does not have that quality domestically. And no, I’m not referring to the political rivalries that characterize Canadian discourse. When the host nation segregates a portion of its population on the basis of ethnicity, as China is currently doing to Uyghur Muslims by placing up to a million of them in internment camps, it’s hard to believe that we have a common goal. The government’s of both Canada and the United States have declared the treatment of Uyghur Muslims in China a genocide. When that’s in the back of a viewer’s mind, athletic achievements seem to lose their lustre.

It’s also quite clear that in the host nation, the ideology of the CCP means much more than sport. You only need to look back to the treatment of Peng Shuai, who disappeared after she made allegations of sexual abuse against a member of the CCP. Disappearances like this are frightening enough in Orwell, never mind when they happen to someone so known to the public. Even Peng Shuai’s recent statements seem coerced, as they deny she made any allegations in the first place. If sport is not at the front of the viewer’s mind, it’s not at the front of the CCP’s mind either.

And lastly, I’ll quickly comment on the location of events. The Big Air event, that is essentially a large ski jump, made news when in the background of the events, viewers were treated to the image of an old steel mill, which has huge smokestacks that look like they could belong to a nuclear power plant. This looks to me like something out of a dystopian fiction, where the absurdities of capitalism are on full display. The skiing may have been appealing to the eye, but an old steel mill is surely not.

The athletes and the events remain as enthralling as ever, and I’m sure that the next Games to be held in a country that respects human rights will be popular. But for this time around, totalitarianism has put viewers off, prompting a much-deserved drop in ratings.

In the case of these Olympics, it’s very hard to believe that unity is the goal because the host nation does not have that quality domestically.

DARYL DONATO/LEAD PHOTOGRAPHER

CONTRIBUTED IMAGE Should Whoopi Goldberg lose her spot on The View?

SAM DUFFY

OPINION DUFFY

On a recent episode of the American talk show The View, panellist Whoopi Goldberg claimed that the Holocaust, the systematic killing of Jewish people under Nazi rule, was not related to issues of race. Critics were appalled and baffled. Goldberg was eventually suspended for two weeks. The comments made by Goldberg were wrong and historically inaccurate at best, and she should have known better. But the real issue is not the content of her remarks, because every person with a working knowledge of history has been able to point out Goldberg’s mistake. Now, a more fruitful conversation can occur where we discuss standards for forgiveness and redemption for people in the public eye. In society’s quest to dichotomize every news story, a standard has been set that requires those who engage in wrong thinking, or make mistakes, to be ousted from the spotlight. We lovingly call this “cancel culture.” But as many fans of Whoopi Goldberg and The View have become aware of this week, it is one thing to silence people with whom you disagree based on their opinion, and another thing entirely to hold to this standard even when people you love may be left out in the cold. I’m old enough to remember when Kevin Hart was given the opportunity to host the 2019 Oscars. The date and the venue were set. It was Hart’s lifelong dream. His big moment. A sign that he had finally “made it” in cutthroat Hollywood. But some weeks before the big night, some of Hart’s old tweets emerged where he used some anti-gay slurs. The tweets are by no means good or funny, which makes this situation relevant to our discussion of forgiveness.

Hart quickly emerged as the target of tweets and news stories that called for his Oscar appearance to be cancelled. He stepped down and then apologized. The critics remained as loud as ever, and the Oscars proceeded with no host.

It’s not the first and it won’t be the last of online “cancelling” campaigns. James Gunn and Gina Carano spring to mind. Keep in mind you don’t have to agree with these people, about their controversial statements or, for that matter, anything they’ve ever said. But if people feel they have made an error, and apologize sincerely, that must not go unnoticed. There must be redemption.

This standard of redemption must be applied equally. If Whoopi Goldberg can make an apology, vanish from airwaves for two weeks, and return relatively unscathed, this path must be available to people like Kevin Hart.

I don’t believe that Whoopi Goldberg should be fired from The View.

She made an uneducated comment that offended many. She apologized sincerely and was educated on the matter by the Anti-Defamation League’s CEO. Goldberg made a mistake, as we all have on numerous occasions. Perhaps we benefit from ours not happening in front of millions of people on live television. Now let’s apply this standard in the future and stop treating people as the media did Kevin Hart. We are all flawed people, and those flaws sometimes rise to the surface. But that doesn’t mean we should be doomed forever, forced to never live out our dreams. Forgiveness, not cancel culture, should be at the heart of these discussions.

Perhaps we benefit from ours not happening in front of millions of people on live television.

This article is from: