NEWS DESK
Opinions run hot over hand-held rubbish Stephen Taylor steve@mpnews.com.au A RYE mother’s complaint about her daughters being made to pick up rubbish in the schoolyard has collected plenty of comment on social media. Messages posted on the Facebook page of the Mornington Peninsula News Group (publisher of The News) ran hot with comments for and against – well, mostly against –Lisa Stone. (“Mother’s call for safety first in schoolyard clean-ups”, The News 26/5/2015). In the article, Ms Stone complained about each of her three daughters being asked by teachers to
pick up litter “with their bare hands” in the grounds of Rye Primary School. She acknowledged collecting rubbish and keeping the grounds free of rubbish was an important way to teach children pride in their environment, but was “not willing to risk my daughter’s health in the process”. Out of more than 100 comments on Facebook, most were unsympathetic: “Cotton wool mothering”, “helicopter parenting”, “get a grip”, “too precious” and “Oh, what a princess”. On the plus side, Emma Prendergast said “cleaners are paid to pick up rubbish. Children are there to be taught. Period”.
Chantelle Lee Granger: “I would just tell my child not to pick the rubbish up - simple; don't pick it up there’s no problem.” Julie Ceschin had the last word: “According to opinion poll ... the ‘get over it’ wins.” A selection of what preceded that assessment: Vicki Melzer: “Build a bridge and get over it, we all did it as kids.” Maree Ryan: “Quick, call a waaaaaaambulance.” Petrina Swagemakers: “I helped cook a bbq at my kid’s primary school years ago and grabbed the bucket of tongs ... How was I to know they
were for rubbish pick up lol ... 200 sausages... 0 deaths.” Chantal Lewis: “Pretty sure that's how we had to pick it up back in the 80s lol. Toughen up princess!” Jan Dickson: “Oh for god’s sake!! What is wrong with parenting these days?? I can't believe some of the ridiculous things parents complain about. Get a grip.” Wendy Clements: “Look lady, we did it when we were kids and it didn't hurt us. Grow up and stop wrapping your kid in cotton wool. That's why they get sick.” Lynne Otter: “It never hurt us back in the day. Kids are more likely to
pick up germs from just playing in the school yard than they are by picking up rubbish with bare hands. Teach them to put rubbish in the bin in the first place and wash their hands problem solved!” Clyde Ditch Dunkley: “Oh no, the world is going to end cotton wool kids.” Megs Alyce-rose: “Yeah ... what's the problem? I'm sure if it was unsafe the teachers wouldn't allow it.” Emma Louise: “Yes, you are at school to learn, learn as much as you can and picking up rubbish is actually teaching your kid something. So wake up. Wash your hands after, no big deal.”
Portsea erosion: laws of nature ignored COMMENT By Jenny Warfe PHOTOS of recent erosion at Portsea beach show what happens when supposed experts ignore the fundamental laws of nature, and continue to throw millions of dollars of taxpayers’ funds at Bandaid “solutions” to complex issues. Sadly, these costly and useless efforts have been driven by government feeling it must respond to the shrill demands from various vested interests to “do something” to save the beach. Well, it hasn’t worked so what now? These hapless, ill-informed works to mitigate the damage have “hardened up” the coastline with sandbags and rocks, but have just moved the problem down to the next section of sandy beach and dunes, which are now collapsing. It’s pretty sad that the supposed experts in our environmental and planning departments seem oblivious to what Sir Isaac Newton worked out 350 years ago (Third Law) – that for every action, there is always an equal and opposite reaction. Energy is never destroyed it is merely transformed or moved. Until experts get their heads around that immutable, fundamental law of nature, and understand we must work with and not against nature, and not just react to calls to “do something”, they will be throwing good money after bad. We will destroy what remains of our natural coastal beauty, and the vested interests will still be demanding that governments “do something”. The millions of dollars spent have had no impact on the twofold problem for government: retaining their image
of being competent, and actually doing something to arrest the damage. It hasn’t improved their image as competent at managing our coastal assets and it certainly hasn’t improved Portsea beach. Indeed, the beach has got worse and worse. It has all but disappeared, and what’s left is ugly, unsafe and certainly not worthy of a visit from all those tourists that the state government and Mornington Peninsula Shire seem to think are the backbone of our local economy. There is no logical end point to this multimillion dollar hardening up of our coastline. If we continue with this outmoded logic, how long before we have a wall of masonry right around Port Phillip? It’s time to bite the bullet and resolve that there will be no more projects that attempt to re-arrange and push back against nature. Our efforts from now on must go towards restoring nature and the protections that it provides to us. And there will be plenty of jobs – and in my opinion more satisfying and worthwhile ones – if we turn over that new leaf. Since channel deepening ended in 2009, successive state governments have spent millions of taxpayers’ dollars trying to retain some beach at Portsea, desperately trying to come up with consultants’ reports that do not draw the increasingly obvious conclusion that it has all gone horribly wrong since the substantial deepening at Port Phillip Heads during the Channel Deepening Project (2008–09). And, it is also possible that the CDP may have not only contributed to the erosion, but also impeded subsequent recovery of the beach. One brave consultant (Water Technology, March
2013) estimated that the CDP dredging had produced “significant” local increases in significant wave height of 7-10 per cent, and wave energy density of 15-20 per cent, at Portsea’s front beach. The CSIRO (April 2013) found it was “conceivable that the CDP may have increased the height of waves impacting the beach at Portsea and therefore some degree of attribution to the CDP is possible”. It’s notable that the tender for the 12-month and latest study awarded by the government in June 2014 was not given to Water Technology, which could have built on the work it had already undertaken. Port Phillip Conservation Council is advocating that before any further dredging in Port Phillip and especially at The Heads occurs (as mooted if the “Bay West” port expansion proceeds) a study of sea levels in Port Phillip for the 20 years 1995-2015 should be undertaken to compare sea levels preceding the CDP (1995-2008) with sea levels since then (2009-2015) for Victorian tide gauge stations inside and outside Port Phillip. We recently wrote to Premier Daniel Andrews to request that such a study be undertaken. The writer is spokesperson of Blue Wedges Coalition, formed to oppose the Port Phillip Channel Deepening Project in 2008-09, and a member of Port Phillip Conservation Council.
Going, going: Erosion at Portsea front beach toward the eastern end happened in early May during storms and strong winds. Picture: Josh Clark/Dive Victoria
M. & A. EGAN ...Don’t miss securing that wanted prope property p rty Immediate access to Bond & Rent nt Move into that property now Fast prompt assistance Easy terms and conditions No upfront fees and charges Pre approval before finding a property We can assist with transfer off bonds between properties
WE CAN ASSIST YOU WITH IMMEDIATE ACCESS S TO BOND AND RENT T
1300 554 470 2-4 Chelsea Rd, Chelsea VIC 3196 Fax: 03 9776 2929 Email: info@bondassist.com.au
www.bondassist.com.au
PAGE 12
Southern Peninsula News 2 June 2015
Licensed Plumber & Gasfitter PIB No: 22042
461 Dundas St, Rye, 3941. PO Box 101, Rye, 3941.
PH: (03) 5985 2322 MOB: 0418 301 980
eganplumbing@bigpond.com