6 Thursday, June 21, 2012 | The Rocky Mountain Collegian
Chancellor |
Neither Martin nor Hickenlooper can fix budget “You can bring somebody new in as Chancellor, and they may be Superman, but there’s a limit to what they can do just as there’s a limit to what the Governor can do.” John Straayer | CSU political science professor
Martin’s job, though, might not be any easier than his time at LSU. According to John Straayer, a political science professor at CSU, Colorado State’s budgetary future may be more precarious than LSU’s. That’s because, due to the Colorado Constitution, neither Hickenlooper nor Martin have the authority to fix the state’s higher education budget woes. “You can bring somebody new in as Chancellor, and they may be Superman, but there’s a limit to what they can do just as there’s a limit to what the Governor can do,” Straayer said. “The solution, if there’s ever going to be one in Colorado, is that there’s going to have to be some complete collapse of the State’s programs to the point that the public wakes up, or there’s going to have to be some extraordinary central leadership resting on a broad base of support from the education, business and professional communities to make some significant modifications to our Constitution.” Martin acknowledges these and other stresses that come with his job, but during his 40 year career in higher education he’s had to learn how to cope with them.
“I try to live by simple rules, and I have a rule about the jobs I’ve taken and the occupations I’ve pursued. It’s this; it needs to be interesting, rewarding and fun. It doesn’t need to be that every day, but over time it needs to meet those three criteria,” Martin said. “I believe that’s what it will be in Colorado.” Producer Nic Turiciano can be reached at entertainment@collegian.com
Michael Martin by the numbers
Unofficial CSU contract: $375,000 per year $50,000 in incentive payments $75,000 in deferred payments Budget cuts: $39 million at CSU since 2008 $120 million at LSU since 2008
RAMOS CHIROPRACTIC Live Happy, Live Healthy $25 Spinal Adjustments Ronn Ramos D.C.
Doctor of Chiropractic drronn@hotmail.com
$5 OenFtFI.D.
with Stud
Walk-ins Welcome, Monday-Friday 9-6 Saturdays 10-2
970-391-3358 | 373 West Drake Road Suite 5B, Fort Collins, CO
Photo Illustration by Nic Turiciano
How five CSU faculty helped map the great red fruit BY NIC TURICIANO The Rocky Mountain Collegian
A Big Mouth Billy Bass hangs high on the wall inside lab E341 in the Anatomy and Zoology building at CSU. He rests on a faux wooden board, ready to ask that you take him to the river in song. Billy’s an oddity, a fish in a science lab, surrounded by instruments— large and small alike— that appear highly specialized and very, very expensive. Billy’s contribution is to lighten the mood in a space that’s responsible for contributing to one of the most important science stories of the year: the mapping of the tomato genome. It’s a project that joins a small group of genome mappings known as gold standards, and the five scientists who work in lab E341 had a large part in making it a reality. Professor Stephen Stack, Lindsay Shearer, Lorinda Anderson, SongBin Chang and Suzanne Royer are among more than 300 individuals in 12 different countries who contributed to the project. Professor Stack, who has been studying tomatoes at CSU since 1978, was part of the initial group that proposed mapping the tomato genome to the National Science Foundation in 2003. Ac-
cording to Stack, the NSF immediately saw the importance of the proposed research, but also knew that it would need to be a multinational, collaborative effort. “Within a month or so we had a meeting in Washington D.C. and all these representatives from, at that time I think it was about 10 different countries, came,” Stack said. “There was great enthusiasm, oh yes. One country would say they’d do a chromosome, another would say they’d do a chromosome and that’s how it came that all these countries got involved.” Stack speculates that upward of $100 million was spent on the project. The reason the cost was worth it, he said, is because the tomato belongs to the genus solanum, which includes important plants such as pepper, potatoes, eggplants and tobacco, among others. “The point is, once you get a real sequence on one of these very high quality sequences, you already know a whole lot about the other organisms that are very closely related,” Stack said. The project has seen attention from well known news sources such as Reuters, www.msnbc.com, The Washington Post, TIME, Popular Science
and was featured as the cover story on the science journal Nature. And that, the fact that the project has entered into the general public’s conversation, is surprising to Lindsay Shearer. “It seems so interesting [to] those of us who work on it, but it is always satisfying when others pay attention and are interested too,” Shearer, who worked as a lab member on the project, wrote in an email. “Our team’s role in the entire project is more supportive than anything. We didn't do any of the actual sequencing, but helped to relate the sequence to the
chromosome.” Work for the team in E341, however, isn’t finished. “There will continue to be work to more fully complete and to verify the sequence for a while— maybe a year or so,” Lorinda Anderson, a lab member of the project, wrote in an email. “The genome sequence is already available to researchers, and they will use it in their own research to address important biological questions about fruit ripening and so forth.” Producer Nic Turiciano can be reached entertainment@collegian.com
NIC TURICIaNO | COLLEGIAN
From left to right, Lindsay Shearer, Lorinda Anderson, Suzanne Royer and Stephen Stack stand with a copy of Nature. The four are part of a multinational, nine year project that sequenced the tomato genome.