Blackout at FCC Since 1949
Volume CXIII, edition 7
November 28, 2007
www.fresnocitycollegerampage.com
ACLU weighs in on Clinton issue
Rallies Possible Patterson answers to Academic Senate by Carrie Gunter and Joseph Rios Rampage Reporters
Passive Resistance
Photo by Joseph Rios
Free Speech Collective rallies to raise awareness on campus by Cynthia Moreno Rampage Reporter
The 1960s Civil Rights movements did more than instigate massive movements of individuals protesting their civil rights and liberties. Students at universities across the nation became the protectors of the rights that students today leisurely enjoy. Historically, the movement began on the University of California, Berkeley campus. At the time, it was the largest studentlead protest in the history of the nation and has remained so as the core movement for students’ right to free speech and academic freedom. The protest aimed at lifting a ban on on-campus political activities were restricted to two political parties at the time. Moreover, student activities were to be conducted outside of the university’s property. The protest, which lasted a
few months ended favorably for the students. Students were then allowed to hold political functions and all other functions pertaining to on-campus groups and organizations. As a result, the student’s success in the protest became known as the Free Speech Movement which spread throughout other college campuses in the nation in an effort to alleviate the restraints placed on free speech. Today, those same restraints on free speech are being questioned on the Fresno City College campus. To speak or not to speak? The question alone has caused a debacle among Fresno City College students, and more particularly with activist groups such as the Fresno Speech Collective. The on/off campus organization compiled of more than 50
members from Fresno City College and the surrounding community, gathered around Fresno City College’s main fountain area on Nov 8, 2007 to protest violations of their ‘freedom of speech’ and the rights associated with it. According to the organization, many of the guidelines and procedures that a student must take in order to assemble for a cause
suppress, repress, and infringe on the rights of the students. “The goal of this protest is to make people aware of free speech while celebrating its many manifestations through action, visual artistry and voice” stated Sarah Reuter, one of the press representatives for the Fresno Speech See “Collective” page 4
Inside
Unique art display - page 5
‘Altruist’ his the stage - page 6
Holiday Diversity - page 13
‘American Gangster’ - page 9
The American Civil Liberties Union issued a formal interpretation of the Education Code regarding political activity on California community college campuses to President Ned Doffoney on Nov 14. The organization’s interest stemmed from the variety of justifications offered by Fresno City College and State Center Community College District officials about their decision to halt discussions on a potential visit by Hillary Clinton. The Rampage reported that administrators cited statewide Education Code as justification for their decision to deny the Clinton campaign a forum. ACLU staff attorney, Julia Harumi Mass, stated in a letter to Dr. Doffoney, “The purpose of 7054 is to prevent school and community college districts from allowing public resources to be used to the advantage or disadvantage of one candidate over another or one side of a ballot initiative over the other.” The FCC Academic Senate invited Teresa Patterson, Executive Director for Legislative and Public Affairs for State Center Community College District, to explain the district’s role in the decision making process. Patterson said that hosting the Clinton rally on the FCC campus would have been a violation of the law. “They wanted the balloons, they wanted the signs, they wanted the cameras, and all of that,” Patterson said at the biweekly meeting. “My recommendation for this campaign… was ‘no’ we can’t have a political rally.” However, according to the ACLU, “The college can comply with the mandates…by providing equal access to candidates (and initiative opponents and proponents) and charging for the use of campus See “Senate ” page 3